DOCSLIB.ORG

Tillage Systems for Soil and Water Conservation. FAO Soils Bulletin No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tillage Systems for Soil and Water Conservation. FAO Soils Bulletin No Tillage systems i for soil and water conservation F000 ANO AOMCULTuNt ONGANUADON OF TNE watt()NATIONS FOREWORD The Food and Agriculture Organiaation of the United Nations (FAO) has been concerned with the need for soil and water conservation since its establishment in 1945. Since that time, FAO has supported numerous projects, sponsored or participated in various con- ferences and seminars, and published various bulletins, reports, proceedings, etc. to focus attention on the nature of this worldwide problem and to provide information regarding remedial action to be taken to alleviate the problem. However, the problem remains, and the increasing world population is resulting in intensified cropping of the limited areas of arable land to provide the necessary food in some countries. Unless effective conservation practices are used, such intensive cropping tends to increase the loss of soil and water resources. This trend must be reversed. The objectives of this Soils Bulletin are to present the principles and practices of tillage systems for sustained food production and to create an awareness of the need to conserve the world’s soil water and energy resources for future generations. Although energy is an integral part of tillage systems, the emphasis is on soil and water conservation. However, effects of the systems on energy are discussed where appropriate. This Bulletin emphasizes tillage systems for developing countries, but relies heavily on principles that have been developed throughout the world. It is intended mainly for the training of and use by extension workers for improving crop production through use of improved tillage systems for conserving the soil and water resources in developing countries. Since not all the solutions to particular soil conditions are yet known, the need for more research on conservation tillage in developing countries is stressed. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations is greatly indebted to the Agricultural Research Service of the US Department of Agriculture and in particular to its Conservation and Production Research Laboratory at Bushland for permitting Dr. Paul W. Unger to research and write this bulletin over a period of time. FAO is most grateful for his assistance. The author is a noted Soil Scientist with years of experience in conservation tillage research under a range of conditions. He has published about a hundred papers, many dealing with conservation tillage, and is one of the most renowned experts in this field. Though material for this publication has been drawn in large part from the USA where most of the experience on conservation tillage exists, results from developing countries have been taken into due consideration and cited. The author has used illustrations from many sources and acknowledges with thanks permission to use copyright material. In all cases credits are given under the appropriate illustration or with the table. The author wishes to express his sincere gratitude to FAO for the invitation to prepare this bulletin, to the USDA Agricultural Research Station for permitting him to accept the invitation, and to the many people who helped in numerous ways to make this bulletin possible. Special thanks go to Drs. M.D. HIeilman and B.A. Stewart of the USDA Agricultural Research Service and to Dr. D.M. Van Doren Jr., of the Ohio Research and Development Center for reviewing and offering suggestions for improvement, and to Mrs. Lynette Lott for typing the original and several Revised versions of the manuscript for the bulletin. CONTENTS Page Foreword iii 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Opening Statements 1 1.2 Objective 9 1.3 Intended Audience 9 1.4 Summary and Conclusions 9 2. LAND DEGRADATION 13 2.1 Types 13 2.1.1 Erosion 13 2.1.2 Silt deposition 25 2.1.3 Desertification and dune creep 27 2.1.4 Salinization and alkalization 28 2.2 Potentials for Controlling Land Degradation 29 2.2.1 Introduction of appropriate land use measures 29 2.2.2 Tillage 30 2.2.3 Practices related to tillage 31 2.2.4 Alternate practices 31 3. TILLAGE SYSTEMS 33 3.1 Selection of Tillage System 33 3.1.1 Climatic zone 33 3.1.2 Crop to be grown 36 3.1.3 Soil factors 37 3.1.4 Economic level of the farmer 45 3.1.5 Preference of the farmer 47 3.1.6 Social influences 47 3.1.7 Government policies 48 3.2 Cultivation Systems 50 3.2.1 Traditional shifting cultivation 50 3.2.2 Labour intensive continuous cultivation 63 3.2.3 Animal-draught and small tractor cultivation 80 3.2.4 Modern high-technology cultivation 3.2.5 Dust mulches 168 3.3 Cost Comparisons of Different Tillage Systems 170 4. CROP MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS IN RELATION TO TILLAGE 179 4.1 Continuous Cropping 179 4.2 Crop Rotations 182 4.3 Multiple Cropping 186 5. SUPPORTING PRACTICES 193 5.1 Land Smoothing 193 5.2 Contour Tillage 193 5.3 Strip Cropping 195 5.4 Graded Furrows 196 5.5 Basin Listing 196 5.6 Terracing 5.7 Diversion Terraces, Waterways and Gully Control 204 5.8 Land Levelling 206 5.9 Water Harvesting, Runoff Farming and Water Spreading 206 5.10 Microwatersheds and Vertical Mulches 209 5.11 Mulching 210 5.12 Cover Crops and Catch Crops 211 5.13 Land Imprinting 211 5.14 Irrigation 212 5.15 Drainage 215 5.16 Control of Drifting Sand and Sand Dunes 216 6. TYPES AND USES OF CROP PRODUCTION EQUIPMENT 219 6.1 Equipment for Clean Tillage Systems 219 6.1.1 Hand powered system 219 6.1.2 Animal powered system 221 6.1.3 Tractor powered system 222 6.2 Equipment for Conservation Tillage Systems 229 6.2.1 Stubble mulch tillage 229 6.2.2 Minimum or reduced tillage 232 6.2.3 No-tillage 233 REFERENCES 241 APPENDIX 1 Glossary 271 APPENDIX 2 Common names and scientific names of crops mentioned in the report 273 APPENDIX 3 Common and chemical names of herbicides mentioned in the report 275 APPENDIX 4 Classification of soil series mentioned in the report (US Classification System) 276 APPENDIX 5 Pest organisms other than weeds mentioned in the report 277 APPENDIX 6 Common and scientific names of weeds mentioned in the report 278 LIST OF FIGURES Page l. A farmer in Ethiopia digging potatoes with a primitive tool 2 2. “Ploughing” by hand in Upper Volta 2 3. Workers preparing land for planting in Jordan 3 4. Hand tillage equipment in Bangladesh 3 5. Primitive plough (goose-foot cultivator) in Chile 4 6. Preparing a seedbed for millet in Nigeria 4 7. Disk plough in Libya 5 8. Chisel plough 5 9. Shifting cultivation in Indonesia 6 10. Intensive grazing by sheep contributes to soil erosion 7 11. Women of Togo carrying crop products from the fields 7 12. Soil erosion and silt deposition in clean-tilled maize field with rows up and down the slope in Illinois 8 13. Slope steepness and length affect soil erosion 8 14. Sand dunes in Pakistan 15 15. Sand dunes of the Namib desert, Namibia 15 16. Disk ploughs or harrows which often result in a relatively smooth soil surface usually are less effective for soil and water conservation than some other implements 16 17. A heavy-duty cultivator leaves a residue-covered, cloddy surface which reduces soil and water losses 16 18. Falling drop of water impacts soil surface 18 19. Intense rain loosens and lifts soil particles 18 20. Intense rainfall on bare soil causes aggregate dispersion, surface sealing, and high runoff and low infiltration of water 19 21. Rill erosion on wheatland in the Palouse region of Washington, USA 19 22. Gully erosion in the Oued Lallouf hills of Tunisia 20 23. Maximum potential annual soil loss due to sheet and rill erosion in Morocco 22 24. Extensive erosion caused by deforestation in Colombia 22 25. Food distribution in Bangladesh in 1977 24 26. Women and children awaiting emergency feeding in Ethiopia 24 27. Silt deposited in low area of maize field in the USA 26 28. Workers removing silt from Solo River in Java, Indonesia 26 29. Complex pattern of saline (dark) and non-saline (light) areas in Iraq 28 30. Farmer in Brazil amid plants that are badly in need of water 34 31. Straw left on the surface by non-inversion tillage increases water absorption and helps control wind and water erosion 34 32. Terraced rice field, Luzon 37 33. Terraced land north of Taipei, Taiwan 38 34. Relatively smooth surface (left) resulted from disk tillage and rough surface (right) from chisel tillage 38 35. Clean tillage on the contour with a lister plough in Israel 40 36. Lister ploughing a field after wheat harvest 40 37. Basin lister in Uganda 41 38. Water from precipitation in basin-listed furrows on the contour 41 39. Stubble mulch tillage with sweep equipment 42 40. One-way disk plough 42 41. Effect of soil random roughness and pore space on cumulative infiltration 43 42. Burning crop residues releases plant nutrients and minimizes tillage problems, but destroys residues that effectively conserve soil and water 49 43. Homes of the Ovambos in Namibia 53 44. Plants intercept raindrops, thus protecting the soil surface against erosion 57 45. Erosion removed soil from unprotected areas, leaving behind soil pedestals capped by rocks 58 46. Equipment used for jungle clearing in the Gal Oya valley of Sri Lanka 60 47. Shifting cultivation in Indonesia: land cleared by felling trees and burning 60 48. Small fields of Sherpa villagers in Nepal 68 49. Land fragmentation in Ghana 68 50. Land fragmentation in Uganda 70 51.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conservation Tillage and Organic Farming Reduce Soil Erosion
    Conservation tillage and organic farming reduce soil erosion Steffen Seitz, Philipp Goebes, Viviana Loaiza Puerta, Engil Isadora Pujol Pereira, Raphaël Wittwer, Johan Six, Marcel G. A. van der Heijden, Thomas Scholten To cite this version: Steffen Seitz, Philipp Goebes, Viviana Loaiza Puerta, Engil Isadora Pujol Pereira, Raphaël Wittwer, et al.. Conservation tillage and organic farming reduce soil erosion. Agronomy for Sustainable De- velopment, Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA, 2019, 39 (1), pp.4. 10.1007/s13593-018-0545-z. hal-02422719 HAL Id: hal-02422719 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02422719 Submitted on 23 Dec 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Agronomy for Sustainable Development (2019) 39: 4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0545-z RESEARCH ARTICLE Conservation tillage and organic farming reduce soil erosion Steffen Seitz1 & Philipp Goebes1 & Viviana Loaiza Puerta2 & Engil Isadora Pujol Pereira3 & Raphaël Wittwer4 & Johan Six2 & Marcel G. A. van der Heijden4,5 & Thomas Scholten1 Accepted: 12 November 2018 /Published online: 18 December 2018 # INRA and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract The impact of different arable farming practices on soil erosion is only partly resolved, and the effect of conservation tillage practices in organic agriculture on sediment loss has rarely been tested in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • SB661 a Glossary of Agriculture, Environment, and Sustainable
    This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu. A Glossary of Agriculture, Environment, and Sustainable Development Bulletin 661 Agricultural Experiment Station, Kansas State University Marc Johnson, Director This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu. A GLOSSARY OF AGRICULTURE, ENVIRONMENT, AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT1 R. Scott Frey2 ABSTRACT This glossary contains general definitions of over 500 terms related to agricultural production, the environment, and sustainable develop- ment. Terms were chosen to increase awareness of major issues for the nonspecialist and were drawn from various social and natural science disciplines, including ecology, biology, epidemiology, chemistry, sociol- ogy, economics, anthropology, philosophy, and public health. 1 Contribution 96-262-B from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station. 2 Professor of Sociology, Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-4003. 1 This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu. PREFACE Agricultural production has increased dramatically in the United States and elsewhere in the past 50 years as agricultural practices have evolved. But this success has been costly: water pollution, soil depletion, and a host of human (and nonhuman) health and safety problems have emerged as impor- tant side effects associated with modern agricultural practices. Because of increased concern with these costs, an alternative view of agricultural production has arisen that has come to be known as sustain- able agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Tillage Implements Are Broadly Categorized Into Several Groups Depending on the Purpose for Which They Are Use: Primary Tillage Implements
    Tillage implements are broadly categorized into several groups depending on the purpose for which they are use: Primary Tillage implements Implements used for opening and loosening of the soil are known as ploughs. Ploughs are used for primary tillage. Ploughs are of three types: wooden ploughs, iron or inversion ploughs and special purpose ploughs. Wooden plough or Indigenous plough Indigenous plough is an implement which is made of wood with an iron share point. It consists of body, shaft pole, share and handle. It is drawn with bullocks. It cuts a V shaped furrow and opens the soil but there is no inversion. Ploughing operation is also not perfect because some unploughed strip is always left between furrows. This is reduced by cross ploughing, but even then small squares remain unploughed. Soil Turning Ploughs Soil turning ploughs are made of iron and drawn by a pair of bullocks or two depending on the type of soil. These are also drawn by tractors. Mouldboard Plough The parts of mouldboard plough are frog or body, mouldboard or wing, share, landside, connecting, rod, bracket and handle. This type of plough leaves no unploughed land as the furrow slices are cut clean and inverted to one side resulting in better pulverisation. The animal drawn mouldboard plough is small, ploughs to a depth of 15 cm, while two mouldboard ploughs which are bigger in size are attached to the tractor and ploughed to a depth of 25 to 30 cm. Mouldboard ploughs are used where soil inversion is necessary. Victory plough is an animal drawn mouldboard plough with a short shaft.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Soil Properties and No-Tillage Agriculture" (1991)
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Soil Science News and Views Plant and Soil Sciences 1991 The Relationship Between Soil Properties and No- Tillage Agriculture Robert L. Blevins University of Kentucky Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits oy u. Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/pss_views Part of the Soil Science Commons Repository Citation Blevins, Robert L., "The Relationship Between Soil Properties and No-Tillage Agriculture" (1991). Soil Science News and Views. 38. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/pss_views/38 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Plant and Soil Sciences at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Soil Science News and Views by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE Lexington, Kentucky 40546 Department of Agronomy ii i s Vol. 12, No. 2, 1991 The Relationship Between Soil Properties and No-Tillage Agricultural by Robert L. Blevins I am highly honored to be invited to present the 3rd annual S.H. Phillips Distinguished Lecture on No-Tillage Agriculture. My interest and subsequent research efforts in the area of no­ tillage agriculture began in 1969. Shirley Phillips encouraged my efforts through his interest and enthusiasm for this rather radical and new approach to farming without the use of tillage equipment. At that time, Harry Young, a western Kentucky farmer and pioneer of no-tillage agriculture along with Shirley, Jim Herron, Charlie Slack and other co-workers were excited about the potential of this new, innovative farming system and what it could do for the farmers of Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • Seedbed and Planter Preparation
    SoybeaniGrow BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Chapter 11: Seedbed and Planter Preparation C. Gregg Carlson ([email protected]) Kurt Reitsma Obtaining a excellent soybean stand is a necessary step to successful soybean production. Preparing your land and planter for seeding is one of first steps required to optimize soybean yields (Fig. 11.1). Prior to seeding the field, planter maintenance should be completed and during planting the planter and seed placement should be routinely checked. We recommend that soybeans be planted at a depth of from 1 to 1.5 inches. In South Dakota soybean production, the soil temperature is critical and in South Dakota in the early spring, deeper is colder. Soybeans require a warmer soil (54°F) to germinate than corn (50°F). Colder means slower growth and less nutrient uptake. Soybeans are more sensitive to seeding depth than is corn. Studies in Northern climates have consistently shown that seeding soybeans below 2 to 2.5 inches typically results in a seedling population reduction of 20% or more from the number of seeds planted. The goal of this chapter is to provide guidance on seedbed and planter preparation. Seedbed and planter preparation requires planning and should be conducted at various times during the year. Figure 11.1. A John Deere DB120 Crop Planter. (Source: http://photo.machinestogo.net/main.php/v/user/equipment/john-deere-db120-crop-planter.jpg.html) 11-89 extension.sdstate.edu | © 2019, South Dakota Board of Regents Chilling injury Germination of soybean and corn seeds can be reduced by chilling injury. Chilling injury results from the seed uptaking cold water during germination.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface and Subsurface Tillage Effects on Mine Soil Properties and Vegetative Response
    Stephen F. Austin State University SFA ScholarWorks Faculty Publications Forestry 2018 Surface and Subsurface Tillage Effects on Mine Soil Properties and Vegetative Response H. Z. Angel Arthur Temple College of Forestry and Agriculture, Stephen F Austin State University Jeremy Stovall Arthur Temple College of Forestry and Agriculture, Stephen F Austin State University, [email protected] Hans Michael Williams Arthur Temple College of Forestry and Agriculture Division of Stephen F. Austin State University, [email protected] Kenneth W. Farrish Arthur Temple College of Forestry and Agriculture, Stephen F. Austin State University, [email protected] Brian P. Oswald Arthur Temple College of Forestry and Agriculture, Stephen F. Austin State University, [email protected] SeeFollow next this page and for additional additional works authors at: https:/ /scholarworks.sfasu.edu/forestry Part of the Agronomy and Crop Sciences Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Forest Sciences Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Repository Citation Angel, H. Z.; Stovall, Jeremy; Williams, Hans Michael; Farrish, Kenneth W.; Oswald, Brian P.; and Young, J. L., "Surface and Subsurface Tillage Effects on Mine Soil Properties and Vegetative Response" (2018). Faculty Publications. 499. https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/forestry/499 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Forestry at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors H. Z. Angel, Jeremy Stovall, Hans Michael Williams, Kenneth W. Farrish, Brian P. Oswald, and J. L. Young This article is available at SFA ScholarWorks: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/forestry/499 Published March 8, 2018 Forest, Range & Wildland Soils Surface and Subsurface Tillage Effects on Mine Soil Properties and Vegetative Response Soil compaction is an important concern for surface mine operations that H.
    [Show full text]
  • Building the Perfect Seedbed
    Unverferth® Unverferth® Seedbed Tillage Perfecta® Field Cultivator Specifications Specifications Folding Perfecta Models 10, 12 and 14 Perfecta sizes for Bedded Crops Cat. 2 Std. and Quick, Cat. 3 Std. and Quick, Cat. 3 Narrow Quick 10'–28' Cat. 2 Std. and Quick, Cat. 3 Std. and Quick, Cat. 3 Narrow Quick; 7' accepts Cat. 1 Std. and Opt. Quick Hitch (optional adapter pins required) 18' Base with Folding Wings — Single Basket S-Tines Shovels BUILDING THE Bed Rolling Approx. Weight Number of Description Overall Working Transport Transport Number of Rollers, Width Number Approx. Width Baskets (lbs.) Leveling Bar Qty. Size Qty. Size Width S-Tine Width Width Height* S-Tines Weight (lbs.) 4' 5' 6' Teeth 6 30" Adj. 6 10" 40' 39'6" 18'4" 12'2" 79 — 2 5 81 7,060 66" 28' for 5 - 66" Beds — Folding 20 19.5" 20 2.75" 5 - 4 ft. 2,745 PERFECT SEEDBED 39' 37'6" 18'4" 11'4" 75 — 4 3 78 6,615 40 16" 40 1" 37' 35'6" 18'4" 10'7" 71 2 2 3 73 6,250 6 30" Adj. 6 10" 60" 25' for 5 - 60" Beds — Folding 20 19.5" 20 2.75" 5 - 4 ft. 3,365 15' Base with Folding Wings — Single Basket 40 16" 40 1" 34' 33'6" 15'7" 11'3" 67 1 6 — 68 6,250 4 30" Adj. 4 10" 84" 22' for 3 - 84" Beds — Folding 6 19.5" 6 2.75" 3 - 6 ft. 2,720 32' 31'6" 15'7" 10'5" 63 3 4 — 64 5,960 30 16" 30 1" 30' 29'6" 15'7" 9'8" 59 5 2 — 60 5,570 4 30" Adj.
    [Show full text]
  • No-Till: the Quiet Revolution
    AGRICULTURE No-Till: the Quiet Revolution The age-old practice of turning the soil before planting a new crop is a leading cause of farmland degradation. Many farmers are thus looking to make plowing a thing of the past By David R. Huggins and John P. Reganold © 2008 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC. 70 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN July 2008 ohn Aeschliman turns over a shovelful of topsoil on his 4,000-acre farm in the Palouse Jregion of eastern Washington State. The black earth crumbles easily, revealing a porous structure and an abundance of organic matter that facilitate root growth. Loads of earthworms are visible, too—another healthy sign. Thirty-four years ago only a few earthworms, if any, could be found in a spadeful of his soil. Back then, Aeschliman would plow the fields before each planting, burying the residues from the previous crop and readying the ground for the next one. The hilly Palouse region had been farmed that way for decades. But the tillage was taking a toll on the Palouse, and its famously fertile soil was eroding at an alarming rate. Convinced that there had to be a better way to work the land, Aeschliman decided to experi- ment in 1974 with an emerging method known as no-till farming. Most farmers worldwide plow their land in preparation for sowing crops. The practice of turning the soil before planting buries crop resi- dues, animal manure and troublesome weeds and also aerates and warms the soil. But clear- ing and disturbing the soil in this way can also leave it vulnerable to erosion by wind and water.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Tillage Cultivators for No-Till and Ridge-Till
    Conservation Tillage Cultivators for No-till and Ridge-till Although no-till implies “no tillage,” many producers Ridge-till Equipment using high residue cropping systems allow themselves the In addition to handling high amounts of residue, the fl exibility of row crop cultivation. The protective surface ridge cultivator must be capable of throwing soil up into residue is disturbed only when the plant canopy is rapidly a ridge. Adjustable ridging wings or disk hillers often are beginning to protect the area between rows. Weed escapes used for this purpose. can be controlled with timely cultivation. The amount of soil being thrown as well as its speed and When changing equipment, producers with highly erod- angular direction from the line of travel affect ridge height. ible land should strongly consider a cultivator capable of Deeper, faster cultivation with ridging wings or disk hillers handling high amounts of residue. Ridge-till producers angled outward from the line of travel all contribute to usually cultivate twice, once early and once to reform more soil being thrown into the ridge area. Maximum ridges. Many no-till producers cultivate only as needed fi nal ridge height is limited by the maximum angle at but appreciate having the option for additional cultivation. which the soil will rest (angle of repose) and row width. Ridge-till systems require mechanical cultivation. Banding Shields (such as sheet metal, disks, or spider wheels) pesticides limits chemical costs and helps environmental are used during the fi rst cultivation. Deeper cultivation quality, but makes timely, effective cultivation more critical. during the fi rst pass helps supply loose soil for later ridge building.
    [Show full text]
  • Garden and Field Tillage and Cultivation
    1.2 Garden and Field Tillage and Cultivation Introduction 33 Lecture 1: Overview of Tillage and Cultivation 35 Lecture 2: French Intensive Method of Soil Cultivation 41 Lecture 3: Mechanical Field-Scale Tillage and Cultivation 43 Demonstration 1: Preparing the Garden Site for French-Intensive Soil Cultivation Instructor’s Demonstration Outline 45 Students’ Step-by-Step Instructions 49 Demonstration 2: French-Intensive Soil Cultivation Instructor’s Demonstration Outline 53 Students’ Step-by-Step Instructions 57 Hands-on Exercise 61 Demonstration 3: Mechanical Tillage and Cultivation 63 Assessment Questions and Key 65 Resources 68 Supplements 1. Goals of Soil Cultivation 69 2. Origins of the French-Intensive Method 72 3. Tillage and Bed Formation Sequences for 74 the Small Farm 4. Field-Scale Row Spacing 76 Glossary 79 Appendices 1. Estimating Soil Moisture by Feel 80 2. Garden-Scale Tillage and Planting Implements 82 3. French Intensive/Double-Digging Sequence 83 4. Side Forking or Deep Digging Sequence 86 5. Field-Scale Tillage and Planting Implements 89 6. Tractors and Implements for Mixed Vegetable 93 Farming Operations Based on Acreage 7. Tillage Pattern for Offset Wheel Disc 94 Part 1 – 32 | Unit 1.2 Tillage & Cultivation Introduction: Soil Tillage & Cultivation UNIT OVERVIEW MODES OF INSTRUCTION Cultivation is a purposefully broader > LECTURES (3 LECTURES, 1–1.5 HOURS EACH) concept than simply digging or tilling Lecture 1 covers the definition of cultivation and tillage, the the soil—cultivation involves an general aims of soil cultivation, the factors influencing culti- vation approaches, and the potential impacts of excessive or array of tools, materials and methods ill-timed tillage.
    [Show full text]
  • Pursuing Conservation Tillage Systems for Organic Crop Production
    ATTRA's ORGANIC MATTERS SERIES PURSUING CONSERVATION TILLAGE SYSTEMS FOR ORGANIC CROP PRODUCTION By George Kuepper, NCAT Agriculture Specialist, June 2001 Contents: Introduction ............................................................................................................................2 Organic Farming & the Tillage Dilemma .........................................................................3 Mulch Tillage .........................................................................................................................5 Ridge Tillage ..........................................................................................................................5 Killed Mulch Systems ..........................................................................................................6 Mowing ..................................................................................................................6 Undercutting .........................................................................................................7 Rolling & Roll-Chopping ..................................................................................8 Weather-Kill .........................................................................................................8 Cover Crops for Killed Mulch Systems ..........................................................9 The Challenges of Killed Mulches ...................................................................9 Resources & Research on Killed Mulches ......................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Wildland Shrub and Arid Land Restoration Symposium
    United States Department of Agriculture Proceedings: Forest Service Intermountain Wildland Shrub and Research Station General Technical Report INT-GTR-315 Arid Land Restoration April 1995 Symposium SHRUB RESEARCH CONSORTIUM USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Shrub Sciences Laboratory*, Provo, Utah, E. Durant McArthur (Chairman); Brigham Young University*, Provo, Utah, Daniel J. Fairbanks; USDA Agricultural Research Service, Renewable Resource Center*, Reno, Nevada, James A. Young; Utah State University*, Logan, Frederick D. Provenza; State of Utah, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife Resources*, Salt Lake City, David K. Mann; University of California, Los Angeles, Philip W. Rundel; Colorado State University, Fort Collins, William K. Lauenroth; University of Idaho, Moscow, Steven J. Brunsfeld; University of Montana, Missoula, Don Bedunah; Montana State University, Bozeman, Carl L. Wambolt; University of Nevada-Reno, Paul T. Tueller; University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Stanley D. Smith; Oregon State University, Corvallis, Lee E. Eddleman; New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, Kelly W. Allred; Texas A & M System, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, San Angelo, Darrell N. Ueckert; Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Ronald E. Sosebee; USDA Agricultural Research Service, High Plains Grassland Research Station, Cheyenne, D. Terrance Booth; USDA Agricultural Research Service, Jornada Experimental Range, Las Cruces, New Mexico, Jerry R. Barrow; USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Renewable Resource Center, Reno, Nevada, Robin J. Tausch; University of Utah, Salt Lake City, James R. Ehleringer; Weber State University, Ogden, Utah, Cyrus M. McKell; Washington State University, Pullman, Benjamin A. Zanora; University of Wyoming, Laramie, Rollin H. Abernethy; Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories, Richland, Washington, Steven O. Link; E G & G Energy Measurements, Inc., Las Vegas, Nevada, W.
    [Show full text]