Myr 2006 Liberia.Pdf (English)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
IRIN/Liberia/2004 Consolidated Appeals Process (CAP) The CAP is much more than an appeal for money. It is an inclusive and coordinated programme cycle of: • strategic planning leading to a Common Humanitarian Action Plan (CHAP); • resource mobilisation (leading to a Consolidated Appeal or a Flash Appeal); • coordinated programme implementation; • joint monitoring and evaluation; • revision, if necessary; and • reporting on results. The CHAP is a strategic plan for humanitarian response in a given country or region and includes the following elements: • a common analysis of the context in which humanitarian action takes place; • an assessment of needs; • best, worst, and most likely scenarios; • stakeholder analysis, i.e. who does what and where; • a clear statement of longer-term objectives and goals; • prioritised response plans; and • a framework for monitoring the strategy and revising it if necessary. The CHAP is the foundation for developing a Consolidated Appeal or, when crises break or natural disasters strike, a Flash Appeal. Under the leadership of the Humanitarian Coordinator, the CHAP is developed at the field level by the Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) Country Team. This team mirrors the IASC structure at headquarters and includes UN agencies and standing invitees, i.e. the International Organization for Migration, the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, and NGOs that belong to ICVA, Interaction, or SCHR. Non-IASC members, such as national NGOs, can be included, and other key stakeholders in humanitarian action, in particular host governments and donors, should be consulted. The Humanitarian Coordinator is responsible for the annual preparation of the consolidated appeal document. The document is launched globally each November to enhance advocacy and resource mobilisation. An update, known as the Mid-Year Review, is to be presented to donors in July 2006. Donors provide resources to appealing agencies directly in response to project proposals. The Financial Tracking Service (FTS), managed by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), is a database of donor contributions and can be found on www.reliefweb.int/fts In sum, the CAP works to provide people in need the best available protection and assistance, on time. ORGANISATIONS PARTICIPATING IN CONSOLIDATED APPEALS DURING 2006: AARREC CESVI GSLG OCHA UNAIDS AASAA CHFI HDO OCPH UNDP ABS CINS HI ODAG UNDSS Abt Associates CIRID HISAN - WEPA OHCHR UNESCO ACF/ACH/AAH CISV Horn Relief PARACOM UNFPA ACTED CL INTERSOS PARC UN-HABITAT ADRA CONCERN IOM PHG UNHCR Africare COOPI IRC PMRS UNICEF AGROSPHERE CORD IRD PRCS UNIFEM AHA CPAR IRIN PSI UNMAS ANERA CRS JVSF PU UNODC ARCI CUAMM MALAO RFEP UNRWA ARM CW MCI SADO UPHB AVSI DCA MDA SC-UK VETAID CADI DRC MDM SECADEV VIA CAM EMSF MENTOR SFCG VT CARE ERM MERLIN SNNC WFP CARITAS EQUIP NA SOCADIDO WHO CCF FAO NNA Solidarités WVI CCIJD GAA (DWH) NRC SP WR CEMIR Int’l GH OA STF ZOARC CENAP TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................1 2. CHANGES IN THE CONTEXT AND HUMANITARIAN CONSEQUENCES .................................2 3. REVIEW OF THE COMMON HUMANITARIAN ACTION PLAN ...................................................4 3.1 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................4 3.1.1 Impact of funding levels on the Common Humanitarian Action Plan (CHAP) implementation................................................................................................................................4 3.2 SCENARIO ................................................................................................................................5 3.3 STRATEGIC PRIORITIES .............................................................................................................5 3.4 RESPONSE PLANS.....................................................................................................................6 4. MONEY AND PROJECTS............................................................................................................15 5. CONCLUSION ..............................................................................................................................20 NEW PROJECTS ..............................................................................................................................21 REVISED PROJECTS.......................................................................................................................62 ANNEX I. TABLE I. SUMMARY OF REQUIREMENTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS BY APPEALING ORGANISATION AND BY SECTOR ..............................................................................................................................................88 ANNEX II. TABLES FOR THE 2006 CAP MYR.......................................................................................................91 ANNEX III. STATUS OF ROADS IN LIBERIA ..............................................................................................................92 ANNEX IV. IDP AND REFUGEE RETURNS AS OF APRIL 2006...................................................................................93 ANNEX V. CSA BRIEFING ....................................................................................................................................94 ANNEX VI. RETURN AREAS COUNTIES OF PREFERRED RESETTLEMENT OF EX-COMBATANS ....................................95 ANNEX VII. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ..........................................................................................................96 ii i iv v LIBERIA 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Liberia’s humanitarian situation and political climate has witnessed significant improvements since the launch of the 2006 Consolidated Appeal (CAP) in November 2005. A new Government has been installed following free and fair elections, former President Charles Taylor has been taken into custody and transferred to the Hague to face charges of war crimes committed during the conflict in Sierra Leone, over 100,000 ex-combatants have been demobilised, former armed factions disbanded, parliamentary elections completed, and well over a quarter of a million internally displaced people (IDPs) have been given assistance to return home in safety and dignity. Despite these positive developments, Liberia still requires urgent humanitarian assistance and support. The majority of the population remains without access to adequate basic services including healthcare, drinking water, shelter and education. The situation has been compounded by an inadequate physical infrastructure, with many of the roads being rendered impassable during the rainy season. The new Government of Liberia (GoL) has been working hard to find the necessary resources to further develop its capacity to sufficiently address gaps in essential service delivery, and assume governmental functions. To further support these efforts, and in line with the Humanitarian Response Agenda, humanitarian actors in Liberia have come together under the Cluster Leadership Approach. Through the identification of designated lead agencies, the process aims to ensure greater accountability, predictability and partnership for a more effective humanitarian response. With the introduction of the Cluster Leadership Approach in Liberia and the creation of the Inter- Agency Standing Committee Country Team (IASC-CT), stronger partnerships have been forged between the Government, the UN, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and the Red Cross Movement which has resulted in improved humanitarian coordination and service delivery. A working group comprising of representatives from the Government, the UN and NGOs formally agreed upon strategic priorities for the CAP 2006. Having re-assessed these priorities as part of the Mid-Year Review (MYR), these same priorities remain valid and are reaffirmed – namely, to: 1. Provide basic social services to vulnerable populations; 2. Revitalise communities to become sustainable, secure and productive; 3. Strengthen the capacity of civil society and local authorities to support the recovery process. By the end of April 2006, all of the 35 IDP camps had been closed, and more than 314,000 IDPs had received their return assistance packages. Lofa, Bong and Bomi counties have witnessed the vast majority of the returning IDPs, as well as most of the returning refugees. More than 69,000 refugees have been repatriated from neighbouring countries by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) from November 2004. Despite having returned home, the longer-term reintegration and rehabilitation of the returnees is still in progress, as many of their basic needs (as well as those of the wider community) remain unmet. Due to an overall lack of capacity, the health and education sectors remain the most problematic. The prevalence of sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) also remains a key issue of concern. As of mid-June 2006, 28% of the 2006 Liberia CAP had been funded and a total of US$1 40,593,747 had been contributed. The MYR entailed relatively minor revision of some projects’ budgets, as well as including additional high-priority projects, bringing the total amount requested for the remainder of 2006 to $144,719,299. In addition, the World Food Programme (WFP) requested $171 million for Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea through the West Africa Regional Appeal 2006 and 67%