Blockchain for Recordkeeping: Help Or Hype?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Blockchain for Recordkeeping: Help Or Hype? See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309414363 Blockchain for Recordkeeping: Help or Hype? Technical Report · October 2016 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21736.67842 CITATIONS READS 0 1,928 1 author: Victoria Lemieux University of British Columbia - Vancouver 47 PUBLICATIONS 151 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Blockchain technology for record keeping: Help or Hype? View project Records in the Cloud View project All content following this page was uploaded by Victoria Lemieux on 25 October 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Blockchain Technology for Recordkeeping Help or Hype? A Background Paper “Blockchain Technology for Recordkeeping – Help or Hype?” a SSHRC Knowledge Synthesis Grant Study on “How can emerging technologies be leveraged to benefit Canadians?” Investigator Dr. Victoria L. Lemieux [email protected] Volume 2: Appendices This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Blockchain Technology for 33 Recordkeeping Table of Contents Report………………………………………………………………………..Volume 1 Appendix A – Background Paper..................................................................34 Appendix B - Terminology Report …………………………………………….103 Appendix C – Blockchain Companies ……………………………………….142 Appendix D – Blockchain Research Initiatives ………………………………155 Appendix E – Consultation Collaborators……………………………………..160 Appendix F – Dissemination Coverage ………………………………………..161 Appendix G - A Primer on Records and Recordkeeping…………………..162 Appendix H - A Primer on the Blockchain and how it operates…………..165 33 Blockchain Technology for 34 Recordkeeping Appendix A – Background Papers The papers in this appendix should be viewed as works in progress and not as polished reports representing the final views of the project team. 34 Blockchain Technology for 35 Recordkeeping The Law Beyond Trust: Legal Implications of Blockchain Technology for Records Management A Background Paper “Blockchain Technology for Recordkeeping – Help or Hype?” a SSHRC Knowledge Synthesis Grant Study on “How can emerging technologies be leveraged to benefit Canadians?” Prepared by: Dara Hofman, Doctoral Student, Archival science for Principal Investigator Dr. Victoria L. Lemieux The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1 Phone: 604 822 2404 E-Mail: [email protected] 35 Blockchain Technology for 36 Recordkeeping Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 36 FINANCIAL REGULATION ................................................................................................................................. 37 PROPERTY RIGHTS ............................................................................................................................................. 38 REAL PROPERTY ................................................................................................................................................. 39 PERSONAL PROPERTY ....................................................................................................................................... 40 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY .................................................................................................................................. 41 "SMART CONTRACTS" AND CONTRACT LAW .................................................................................................. 41 DRAFTING, SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE AND EQUITABLE PRINCIPLES .............................................................. 42 “SMART PROBATE”: TRUSTS AND ESTATES ........................................................................................................ 42 EVIDENCE ......................................................................................................................................................... 43 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................................... 44 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................................................... 44 Introduction The relationship between law and archival science is an ancient one, based upon society’s need for trust. Law exists largely to administer and mediate rights, providing citizens a trusted framework for asserting their rights vis à vis one another and resolving disputes when those rights come into conflict. The existence of a legal framework also serves to encourage trust between citizens. “By giving legal assurances of remedies for breaches of trust, the law makes parties more likely to be both trusting (thanks to the hedging effect of the legal remedy) and trustworthy (to avoid sanctions). The broad category of institutional-based trust “is dependent on legal or other actions to enforce trusting behavior’.”1 The law, in turn, must have trustworthy records in order to provide remedies that provide a sense of justice; without a trustworthy copy of a contract, for example, a court cannot say if a breach has occurred, and if it has, which parties are owed what remedy. Archival science has developed to meet the need for trustworthy records. However, advancing information and communication technologies (ICTs) have required us to continually update our paradigm for assessing the trustworthiness of records, especially as records are increasingly born-digital. Now, some scholars assert that, thanks to blockchain technology, we’re moving beyond trust, to an era of “trustless transfer” leading to an extralegal system of rights management (Baker, 2015). Blockchain technology, also known as distributed ledger technology (DLT), is not yet a concept with an agreed upon definition. For the purposes of this paper, we will define blockchain as a technology that records transactions in a distributed ledger, using cryptographic hashes to record and verify each transaction (Lemieux, 2015). The most famous blockchain, the Bitcoin blockchain, uses as anonymized public ledger, which authenticates blocks using “proof of work,” where users “earn” the ability to verify blocks on the chain by using their computer processing power to solve equations. However, the Bitcoin blockchain is not the only possible configuration. Private blockchains – such as the one being experimented with by the consortium R3CEV, which includes a number of major banks – are also possible. Authentication by “proof of stake,” in which users buy their right to authenticate blocks by spending resources is also a possibility. Each of these configurations has different operational risks, discussed more fully in Walch, 2016, that in turn, alter the liabilities and legal risks that attach to the blockchain as recordkeeping system. 1 Cross, 2003, p.1484). 36 Blockchain Technology for 37 Recordkeeping Because blockchain is a “trustless” system, it brings records – including legal records – into a new paradigm, whereby rights are administered and mediated, not by a trusted institution or third party, but by the technology. However, this “trustless” system does not actually move us beyond the need for trusted third parties, nor does it remove the enormity of the law in preserving rights and ensuring public trust. As Victoria Lemieux explains, at least with regards to systems where the records themselves are created and maintained outside of the blockchain: “Does using the Bitcoin Blockchain ensure the trustworthiness of the records? No. Trustworthiness is only guaranteed if the records are both reliable and authentic.2 Blockchain solutions do not address the reliability of records, and there are many features of the Bitcoin Blockchain that may negatively affect the authenticity of information as well.” (2016). The issue or reliability is different with regards to cases such as smart contracts or smart probate, where the record itself is hashed to the blockchain. In such a case, reliability is inherently bound up in the blockchain.3 Blockchain technology has largely been associated with cryptocurrencies heretofore, and much of the legislation and regulation that directly addresses blockchain thus far comes from financial and securities law. However, blockchain technology has potential recordkeeping uses far beyond cryptocurrency, and those uses have significant and wide-ranging legal ramifications. Financial uses being explored include payment systems, corporate share issuance, and same day Treasury and security settlement. Potential uses outside of finance include smart contracts and wills, blockchain protection of personally identifiable information in data lakes, and automating back office procedures. Because of the breadth of potential uses for blockchain technology, a substantial number of legal issues are raised by its implementation, including financial regulation, property rights, contract drafting and enforcement, trusts and estates, information security and privacy law, and the law of evidence and rules of civil and criminal procedure. Each of these areas encompasses an extremely large body of law; to address each area and its interrelationship with the blockchain in depth could generate papers, if not books. This paper explores the broad, common legal issues raised by the use blockchain for recordkeeping. Furthermore, while these issues are
Recommended publications
  • Beauty Is Not in the Eye of the Beholder
    Insight Consumer and Wealth Management Digital Assets: Beauty Is Not in the Eye of the Beholder Parsing the Beauty from the Beast. Investment Strategy Group | June 2021 Sharmin Mossavar-Rahmani Chief Investment Officer Investment Strategy Group Goldman Sachs The co-authors give special thanks to: Farshid Asl Managing Director Matheus Dibo Shahz Khatri Vice President Vice President Brett Nelson Managing Director Michael Murdoch Vice President Jakub Duda Shep Moore-Berg Harm Zebregs Vice President Vice President Vice President Shivani Gupta Analyst Oussama Fatri Yousra Zerouali Vice President Analyst ISG material represents the views of ISG in Consumer and Wealth Management (“CWM”) of GS. It is not financial research or a product of GS Global Investment Research (“GIR”) and may vary significantly from those expressed by individual portfolio management teams within CWM, or other groups at Goldman Sachs. 2021 INSIGHT Dear Clients, There has been enormous change in the world of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology since we first wrote about it in 2017. The number of cryptocurrencies has increased from about 2,000, with a market capitalization of over $200 billion in late 2017, to over 8,000, with a market capitalization of about $1.6 trillion. For context, the market capitalization of global equities is about $110 trillion, that of the S&P 500 stocks is $35 trillion and that of US Treasuries is $22 trillion. Reported trading volume in cryptocurrencies, as represented by the two largest cryptocurrencies by market capitalization, has increased sixfold, from an estimated $6.8 billion per day in late 2017 to $48.6 billion per day in May 2021.1 This data is based on what is called “clean data” from Coin Metrics; the total reported trading volume is significantly higher, but much of it is artificially inflated.2,3 For context, trading volume on US equity exchanges doubled over the same period.
    [Show full text]
  • Cryptocurrency and Bitcoin: a Possible Foundation of Future Currency Why It Has Value, What Is Its History and Its Future Outlook
    B.Sc. Essay in Business Cryptocurrency and Bitcoin: A possible foundation of future currency why it has value, what is its history and its future outlook. Sindri Leó Árnason Leiðbeinandi: Guðrún Johnsen Faculty of Business Administration June 2015 Cryptocurrency and Bitcoin: A possible foundation of future currency Why it has value, what is its history and its future outlook. This is a bachelor’s of science essay that counts for 6 ECT credits in the School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Business Administration, at the University of Iceland © 2015 Sindri Leó Árnason Printing: Verslunarfélag Reykjavíkur Reykjavík, 2015 2 | P a g e Preface This is a bachelor’s of science essay that counts for 6 ECT credits in the School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Business Administration, at the University of Iceland. I chose this topic because I had become interested in Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies in 2013-2014 when their media coverage boomed. I had already done some research on this topic beforehand and as I am studying finance at the University of Iceland I wanted to research what Bitcoin’s future impact on the business world could possibly be. I would like to thank Guðrún Johnsen who is a lecturer at the School of Social Sciences, who helped guide me through writing this essay and my father, Árni Leósson, who helped read over my essay, fixing spelling and grammar mistakes as well as helping me develop essential arguments. 3 | P a g e Summary The goal of this project was to find out what exactly cryptocurrency, such as Bitcoin, is and why it has value, what its future outlook is and if it could become the mainstream currency of the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Trading and Arbitrage in Cryptocurrency Markets
    Trading and Arbitrage in Cryptocurrency Markets Igor Makarov1 and Antoinette Schoar∗2 1London School of Economics 2MIT Sloan, NBER, CEPR December 15, 2018 ABSTRACT We study the efficiency, price formation and segmentation of cryptocurrency markets. We document large, recurrent arbitrage opportunities in cryptocurrency prices relative to fiat currencies across exchanges, which often persist for weeks. Price deviations are much larger across than within countries, and smaller between cryptocurrencies. Price deviations across countries co-move and open up in times of large appreciations of the Bitcoin. Countries that on average have a higher premium over the US Bitcoin price also see a bigger widening of arbitrage deviations in times of large appreciations of the Bitcoin. Finally, we decompose signed volume on each exchange into a common and an idiosyncratic component. We show that the common component explains up to 85% of Bitcoin returns and that the idiosyncratic components play an important role in explaining the size of the arbitrage spreads between exchanges. ∗Igor Makarov: Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK. Email: [email protected]. An- toinette Schoar: 62-638, 100 Main Street, Cambridge MA 02138, USA. Email: [email protected]. We thank Yupeng Wang and Yuting Wang for outstanding research assistance. We thank seminar participants at the Brevan Howard Center at Imperial College, EPFL Lausanne, European Sum- mer Symposium in Financial Markets 2018 Gerzensee, HSE Moscow, LSE, and Nova Lisbon, as well as Anastassia Fedyk, Adam Guren, Simon Gervais, Dong Lou, Peter Kondor, Gita Rao, Norman Sch¨urhoff,and Adrien Verdelhan for helpful comments. Andreas Caravella, Robert Edstr¨omand Am- bre Soubiran provided us with very useful information about the data.
    [Show full text]
  • CRYPTO CURRENCY Technical Competence & Rules of Professional Responsibility
    CRYPTO CURRENCY Technical Competence & Rules of Professional Responsibility Marc J. Randazza Rule 1.1 Comment 8 To maintain the requisite knowledge and skill, a lawyer should keep abreast of changes in the law and its practice, including the benefits and risks associated with relevant technology, engage in continuing study and education and comply with all continuing legal education requirements to which the lawyer is subject. Crypto Currency 1. What is Crypto Currency? 2. How does it work? 3. How could you screw this up? Blockchain •Decentralized •Transparent •Immutable Blockchain Blockchain • Time-stamped series of immutable records of data • Managed by a cluster of de-centralized computers • Each block is secured and bound to another, cryptographically • Shared • Immutable • Open for all to see – how you keep it honest Blockchain Blockchain • Transparent but also pseudonymous • If you look on the ledger, you will not see “Darren sent 1 BTC to Trixie” • Instead you will see “1MF1bhsFLkBzzz9vpFYEmvwT2TbyCt7NZJ sent 1 BTC” • But, if you know someone’s wallet ID, you could trace their transactions Crypto Roller Coaster – 5 years Crypto Roller Coaster – 1 day How can you screw this up? Quadriga You can lose it & Bankruptcy Your mind • C$190 million turned to digital dust • Thrown away with no back up • Death of CEO turned death of • $127 million in the trash – gone business • 7,500 BTC – Fluctuates WILDLY Ethical Considerations You might be surprised at what violates Rule 1.8 Which Rules? Rule 1.2 (d) – Criminal or Fraudulent Activity Rule 1.5 (a) – Reasonable Fee Rule 1.6 – Confidentiality Rule 1.8 (a) – Business Dealings With Clients Rule 1.8(f) – Compensation From Other Than Your Client Rule 1.15 (a) – Safekeeping Property Rule 1.15 (c) – Trust Accounts Rule 1.2(d) – Criminal or Fraudulent Activity • Crypto *can* be used for criminal activity • Tends to be difficult, but not A lawyer shall not ..
    [Show full text]
  • How Bitcoin Functions As Property Law Eric D
    College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty and Deans 2019 How Bitcoin Functions As Property Law Eric D. Chason William & Mary Law School, [email protected] Repository Citation Chason, Eric D., "How Bitcoin Functions As Property Law" (2019). Faculty Publications. 1896. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/1896 Copyright c 2019 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs How Bitcoin Functions As Property Law Eric D. Chason* Bitcoin replicates many of the formal aspects of real estate transactions. Bitcoin transactions have features that closely resemble grantor names, grantee names, legal descriptions, and signatures found in real property deeds. While these “Bitcoin deeds” may be interesting, they are not profound. Bitcoin goes beyond creating simple digital deeds, however, and replicates important institutional aspects of real estate transactions, in particular recordation and title assurance. Deeds to real property are recorded in a central repository (e.g., the public records office), which the parties (and the public) can search to determine title. When one grantor executes more than one deed covering the same property, recordation acts (race, notice, and race-notice) determine which grantee wins. The Bitcoin blockchain replicates the public records office, giving anyone with a computer the ability to see any Bitcoin transaction. Bitcoin mining replicates the recording of deeds, a process by which formally valid transactions between two parties become essentially a public record. When one grantor executes more than one transaction covering the same Bitcoin, a miner determines which grantee wins simply by moving one transaction to the blockchain before the others.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mathematics of Bitcoin Cyril Grunspan, Ricardo Pérez-Marco
    The mathematics of Bitcoin Cyril Grunspan, Ricardo Pérez-Marco To cite this version: Cyril Grunspan, Ricardo Pérez-Marco. The mathematics of Bitcoin. European Mathematical Society Newsletter, 2020. hal-02486029 HAL Id: hal-02486029 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02486029 Submitted on 20 Feb 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Newsletter of the EMS – Manuscript Page 1 The mathematics of Bitcoin Cyril Grunspan (De Vinci Research Center, Paris, France) Ricardo Pérez-Marco (CNRS, IMJ-PRG, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France) 1 Introduction to Bitcoin. Bitcoin is a new decentralized payment network that started operating in January 2009. This new technology was created by a pseudonymous author, or group of authors, called Satoshi Nakamoto in an article that was publically released [1] in the cypherpunk mailing list. The cypherpunks are anarchists and cryptographers that who have been concerned with personal privacy in the Internet since the 90’s. This article follows on a general presentation of Bitcoin by the second author [2]. We refer to this previous article for general background. Here we focuss on mathematics being a feature of the security and effectiveness of Bitcoin protocol.
    [Show full text]
  • Blockchain Technology for Recordkeeping
    Blockchain Technology for Recordkeeping Help or Hype? A Background Paper “Blockchain Technology for Recordkeeping – Help or Hype?” a SSHRC Knowledge Synthesis Grant Study on “How can emerging technologies be leveraged to benefit Canadians?” Investigator Dr. Victoria L. Lemieux [email protected] Volume 2: Appendices This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Blockchain Technology for 33 Recordkeeping Table of Contents Report………………………………………………………………………..Volume 1 Appendix A – Background Paper..................................................................34 Appendix B - Terminology Report …………………………………………….103 Appendix C – Blockchain Companies ……………………………………….142 Appendix D – Blockchain Research Initiatives ………………………………155 Appendix E – Consultation Collaborators……………………………………..160 Appendix F – Dissemination Coverage ………………………………………..161 Appendix G - A Primer on Records and Recordkeeping…………………..162 Appendix H - A Primer on the Blockchain and how it operates…………..165 33 Blockchain Technology for 34 Recordkeeping Appendix A – Background Papers The papers in this appendix should be viewed as works in progress and not as polished reports representing the final views of the project team. 34 Blockchain Technology for 35 Recordkeeping The Law Beyond Trust: Legal Implications of Blockchain Technology for Records Management A Background Paper “Blockchain Technology for Recordkeeping – Help or Hype?” a SSHRC Knowledge Synthesis Grant Study on “How can emerging technologies be leveraged to benefit
    [Show full text]
  • The History and the Future of Bitcoin
    Bankovní institut vysoká škola Praha Katedra financí a ekonomie The history and the future of Bitcoin Bachelor thesis Author: Vladimir Malik Supervisor: Ing. Petr Musil, Ph.D. Praha April 2016 Page 1 of 43 Declaration: I declare that I processed the final work on my own and I added all used literature in the list. I confirm that the submission of the electronic form of the work is identical to the printed version, and I am aware of the fact that the work will be archived in the Library BIVŠ and will be made available to third parties through an internal database to electronic works. Prague, date …………… name and surname of the author……………………….. Page 2 of 43 Acknowledgements The author gratefully thanks Ing. Petr Musil, Ph.D. for supervision and active participation in the thesis project consisting of the present study project. Moreover, the author kindly thanks to his family and friends for support while developing and writing the thesis report. The author wishes to acknowledge all the other specialists involved for active advice and support in the entire process. Page 3 of 43 Key words Blockchain BTC Crypto Fiat currencies MMORPG Steam platform Volatility Annotation The thesis submitted aims to map and evaluate development of cryptocurrency Bitcoin. Firstly, the thesis describes basics and general money theory. Next part has a deeper overview of Bitcoin and topics directly connected to it. And to summarize, the last topic includes theories connected to the topic together with future predictions. Page 4 of 43 Table of contents Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... 3 Key words and definitions .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cryptocurrency: a Primer for Policy-Makers
    August 2019 Cryptocurrency: A Primer for Policy-Makers Zack Gold and Megan McBride Approved for public release. Unlimited distribution. CRM-2019-U-020185-Final Abstract This primer is an effort to address a gap in knowledge about cryptocurrencies and the cryptocurrency ecosystem among the policymaking community and advance the understanding of cryptocurrencies and consideration of their national security implications. Cryptocurrencies are strictly digital currencies, are typically overseen by a decentralized peer-to-peer community, and are secured through cryptography. We use clear, non-technical language to describe complex concepts and demystify overly technical terms in order to explain the technical and economic aspects of cryptocurrency, why they are used, and the benefits and drawbacks to cryptocurrencies compared to conventional currencies—like the US dollar. We conclude by considering some cryptocurrency-related issues of which greater exploration would benefit US national security. This document contains the best opinion of CNA at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the sponsor or client. Distribution Approved for public release. Unlimited distribution. Cover image credit: “Photo of a mobile phone with a Bitcoin Cash wallet, Bitcoin whitepaper by Satoshi Nakamoto and Bitcoin.com pen.” BitcoinXio, Apr. 15, 2018. Approved by: August 2019 Jonathan Schroden, Research Program Director Special Operations Program Center for Stability & Development Strategy, Policy, Plans, and Programs Division (SP3) Request additional copies of this document through [email protected]. Copyright © 2019 CNA. All rights reserved Executive Summary In 2017, the value of one Bitcoin skyrocketed to more than $20,000. Media coverage increased, and even people who did not join the investment frenzy became aware of so-called “cryptocurrencies.” Despite this familiarity, few actually understand cryptocurrencies and the implications they may have on US interests, from global finance to national security to good governance.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Bitcoin Cryptocurrency and Its Mining Techniques
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones May 2019 Analysis of Bitcoin Cryptocurrency and Its Mining Techniques Suman Ghimire Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Computer Engineering Commons, Computer Sciences Commons, and the Electrical and Computer Engineering Commons Repository Citation Ghimire, Suman, "Analysis of Bitcoin Cryptocurrency and Its Mining Techniques" (2019). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 3603. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/15778438 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ANALYSIS OF BITCOIN CRYPTOCURRENCY AND ITS MINING TECHNIQUES By Suman Ghimire Bachelor of Electronics and Communication Engineering Tribhuvan University, Nepal 2016 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Master of Science in Engineering-Electrical
    [Show full text]
  • Bitcoin Infographic
    A Brief History of Bitcoin OCTOBER Bitcoin Debuts Satoshi Nakamoto, whose identity 31 remains unknown, releases white 2008 paper: “Bitcoin: A Peer to Peer Electronic Cash System,” establishing Bitcoin and solving the “double-spending” problem. ------------- Satoshi Nakamoto Mines First Bitcoins Using a Central Processing Unit (CPU) JANUARY First block is called the "Genesis Block," in it Nakamoto included the 3 day's headline from the London 2009 Times that reads: "The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of ---se-con-d b-ailo-ut f-or b-ank-s."- -- JANUARY 12 First Bitcoin Transaction 2009 Takes Place Satoshi Nakamoto sends 50 bitcoins -to H-al -Finn-ey- in b-loc-k 17-0. ----- Code for Mining Bitcoin with OCTOBER Graphics Processing Units 2010 (GPUs) Released to the Public As mining becomes more difficult, GPU mining overtakes CPU mining ---as- the- fa-ster- op-tion-. ---- Bitcoin Pizza Day: Laszlo MAY Hanyecz Buys Two Pizzas in the First Known Purchase 22 Made with Bitcoin 2010 Hanyecz posts on a forum, "I'll pay 10,000 bitcoins for a couple of -piz-zas-..lik-e m-ayb-e 2- larg-e o-nes-..."--- FEBRUARY Bitcoin Market Prices 2011 Across Major Exchanges Crosses Parity Threshold with the U.S. Dollar ----Feb-. 9t-h: 1- BT-C =- 1.1-0 U-SD-- gbbcouncil.org Field-Programmable Gate Array MAY (FPGA) Bitcoin Miner Released 20 FPGAs programmed to compute the SHA-256 algorithm to mine bitcoin. 2011 FPGAs are more efficient than GPUs as their hardware is specifically developed f-or m-in-ing -bitc-oin-.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Bitcoin As an Asset Class
    EXPLORING BITCOIN AS AN ASSET CLASS A THESIS Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Economics and Business The Colorado College In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Bachelor of Arts By Martin Gaspar March, 2018 EXPLORING BITCOIN AS AN ASSET CLASS Martin Gaspar February, 2018 Economics Abstract Bitcoin, a digital currency created in 2009, has garnered significant attention over the last couple years for its outsized returns and its significant volatility. However, since it is such a relatively new and controversial asset, many investors remain tepid to invest in it for they do not know how to approach Bitcoin as an investment. I believe this is because investors are unfamiliar with Bitcoin’s unique characteristics and do not realize the extent that Bitcoin, and its markets, have matured since its inception. Consequently, I hypothesize that Bitcoin holds enough features to be considered a legitimate asset class. In this paper, I explore Bitcoin’s potential as an asset class through several established criteria for something to be considered an asset class. I examine how well Bitcoin’s characteristics fulfill those criteria by comparing it to other established asset classes and analyzing their correlations, volatility, and risk-adjusted returns, among other statistics. I find that Bitcoin fulfills most of the criteria for an asset class, but must further develop in some areas before it is appropriate for every kind of investor to invest in it. KEYWORDS: (Bitcoin, Asset Class, Investing) JEL CODES: (Code, Code, Code) ON MY HONOR, I HAVE NEITHER GIVEN NOR RECEIVED UNAUTHORIZED AID ON THIS THESIS Signature TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ii 1 INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………… 1 2 AN OVERVIEW OF BITCOIN 2.1 History of Bitcoin ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]