DOCSLIB.ORG

BITCOIN and BEYOND Royal No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

16.5 mm Edited by Malcolm Campbell- BITCOIN AND BEYOND Royal No. 25 V erduyn RIPE Series in Global Political Economy BITCOIN AND BEYOND CRYPTOCURRENCIES, BLOCKCHAINS, AND GLOBAL GOVERNANCE Edited by Malcolm Campbell- Verduyn A PDF version of this book is available for free in Open Access at www.taylorfrancis.com. It has been made available under a Creative Commons Atrribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license. an informa business ISBN 978-0-415-79214-1 Routledge www.routledge.com 9 780415 792141 Routledge titles are available as eBook editions in a range of digital formats 16.5 mm Bitcoin and Beyond Since the launch of Bitcoin in 2009, several hundred different ‘cryptocurrencies’ have been developed and become accepted for a wide variety of transactions in leading online commercial marketplaces and the ‘sharing economy’, as well as by more traditional retailers, manufacturers, and even by charities and political parties. Bitcoin and its competitors have also garnered attention for their wildly fluc- tuating values as well as implication in international money laundering, Ponzi schemes and online trade in illicit goods and services across borders. These and other controversies surrounding cryptocurrencies have induced varying govern- ance responses by central banks, government ministries, international organiza- tions, and industry regulators worldwide. Besides formal attempts to ban Bitcoin, there have been multifaceted efforts to incorporate elements of blockchains, the peer- to-peer technology underlying cryptocurrencies, in the wider exchange, recording, and broadcasting of digital transactions. Blockchains are being mobil- ized to support and extend an array of governance activities. The novelty and breadth of growing blockchain-based activities have fuelled both utopian prom- ises and dystopian fears regarding applications of the emergent technology to Bitcoin and beyond. This volume brings scholars of anthropology, economics, science and techno- logy studies, and sociology together with global political economy (GPE) scholars in assessing the actual implications posed by Bitcoin and blockchains for contemporary global governance. Its interdisciplinary contributions provide academics, policymakers, industry practitioners, and the general public with more nuanced understandings of technological change in the changing character of governance within and across the borders of nation-states. Malcolm Campbell- Verduyn is an SSHRC Postdoctoral Fellow at the Balsillie School of International Affairs, Canada. RIPE Series in Global Political Economy Series Editors: James Brassett (University of Warwick, UK), Eleni Tsingou (Copenhagen Business School, Denmark) and Susanne Soederberg (Queen’s University, Canada) The RIPE Series published by Routledge is an essential forum for cutting-edge scholarship in international political economy. The series brings together new and established scholars working in critical, cultural, and constructivist political economy. Books in the RIPE Series typically combine an innovative contribu- tion to theoretical debates with rigorous empirical analysis. The RIPE Series seeks to cultivate: • field- defining theoretical advances in international political economy • novel treatments of key issue areas, both historical and contemporary, such as global finance, trade, and production • analyses that explore the political economic dimensions of relatively neg- lected topics, such as the environment, gender relations, and migration • accessible work that will inspire advanced undergraduates and graduate stu- dents in international political economy. The RIPE Series in Global Political Economy aims to address the needs of stu- dents and teachers. For a full list of titles in this series, please visit www.routledge.com/RIPE- Series-in- Global-Political- Economy/book-series/RIPE Beyond Defeat and Austerity Disrupting (the Critical Political Economy of ) Neoliberal Europe David Bailey, Monica Clua- Losada, Nikolai Huke and Olatz Ribera-Almandoz Civil Society and Financial Regulation Consumer Finance Protection and Taxation after the Financial Crisis Lisa Kastner Bitcoin and Beyond Cryptocurrencies, Blockchains, and Global Governance Edited by Malcolm Campbell- Verduyn Bitcoin and Beyond Cryptocurrencies, Blockchains, and Global Governance Edited by Malcolm Campbell- Verduyn First published 2018 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN and by Routledge 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2018 selection and editorial matter, Malcolm Campbell-Verduyn; individual chapters, the contributors The right of Malcolm Campbell-Verduyn to be identified as the author of the editorial matter, and of the authors for their individual chapters, has been asserted in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. The Open Access version of this book, available at www.taylorfrancis.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license. Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data A catalog record for this book has been requested ISBN: 978-0-415-79214-1 (hbk) ISBN: 978-1-315-21190-9 (ebk) Typeset in Times New Roman by Wearset Ltd, Boldon, Tyne and Wear Contents List of figures vii List of tables viii Notes on contributors ix Acknowledgements xiii 1 Introduction: what are blockchains and how are they relevant to governance in the contemporary global political economy? 1 MALCOLM CAMPBELL- VERDUYN 2 Moneys at the margins: from political experiment to cashless societies 25 MORITZ HÜTTEN AND MATTHIAS THIEMANN 3 The internal and external governance of blockchain-based organizations: evidence from cryptocurrencies 48 YING- YING HSIEH, JEAN- PHILIPPE (JP) VERGNE, AND SHA WANG 4 The mutual constitution of technology and global governance: Bitcoin, blockchains, and the international anti- money-laundering regime 69 MALCOLM CAMPBELL- VERDUYN AND MARCEL GOGUEN 5 Between liberalization and prohibition: prudent enthusiasm and the governance of Bitcoin/blockchain technology 88 KAI JIA AND FALIN ZHANG 6 Cryptocurrencies and digital payment rails in networked global governance: perspectives on inclusion and innovation 109 DAIVI RODIMA- TAYLOR AND WILLIAM W. GRIMES vi Contents 7 Governing what wasn’t meant to be governed: a controversy- based approach to the study of Bitcoin governance 133 FRANCESCA MUSIANI, ALEXANDRE MALLARD, AND CÉCILE MÉADEL 8 Experiments in algorithmic governance: a history and ethnography of “The DAO,” a failed decentralized autonomous organization 157 QUINN DUPONT 9 Conclusion: towards a block age or blockages of global governance? 178 MALCOLM CAMPBELL- VERDUYN Index 198 Figures 3.1 Variation of the five cryptocurrencies in our sample along the decentralization spectrum 58 4.1 The mutually constitutive relationship between technologies and international regimes 71 5.1 Spectrum of Bitcoin/blockchain governance 91 5.2 Bitcoin price fluctuations, 2009–17 (US dollars) 94 9.1 Interrelationships between governance by, with, and of blockchains 186 Tables 2.1 Evolution of the Bitcoin money game 41 3.1 List of variables 62 3.2 Regression results 63 5.1 Key events and policies in China 102 Contributors Malcolm Campbell- Verduyn is an SSHRC postdoctoral fellow at the Balsillie School of International Affairs. His research combines a general focus on lan- guage and ideas in the global political economy, with a specific interest in the roles of private actors, technologies, and technical artefacts in contemporary global governance. His research has appeared in the journals Business and Politics, Competition and Change, Global Society, Journal of European Public Policy, New Political Economy, and New Political Science. He is the author of Professional Authority after the Global Financial Crisis, published in 2017 by Palgrave Macmillan. Quinn DuPont is a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Washington. He studies human and social dimensions of cybersecurity, cryptography, and code. He has a PhD in information science (Toronto), and is an ALA- accredited librarian (Western), with a decade of industry experience as a senior information specialist at IBM, an IT consultant, and a usability and experience designer. He is currently writing a book on cryptocurrencies and blockchains (Polity). Marcel Goguen is a PhD candidate in political science at McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. He studied political science at l’Université de Moncton and the University of Ottawa. His research focuses on the interstice between international relations theory, political theory, and global finance. Under the supervision of Tony Porter, he is participating in research funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) on ‘Numbers in the changing fabric of global governance’. William W. Grimes is Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of International Relations and Political Science at the Frederick S. Pardee School of Global Studies at Boston University. He is the author of Unmak- ing the Japanese Miracle: Macroeconomic Politics, 1985–2000 (Cornell University Press, 2001) and Currency and Contest in East Asia: The Great Power
Recommended publications
  • Enforcement Trends in Cryptocurrency

    Enforcement Trends in Cryptocurrency

    Latham & Watkins Financial Institutions Group & White Collar December 9, 2015 | Number 1904 Defense & Investigations Practice Enforcement Trends in Cryptocurrency Cryptocurrency is on the rise...and so are enforcement actions. In less than a decade, cyptocurrencies have grown from a novelty reserved for those dealing in the illicit into a robust platform embraced by financial institutions and businesses alike. Wall Street and strategic investors have increasingly taken note, working to adapt their technology, streamline market trading and integrate cryptocurrency into everyday financial transactions. The rapid adoption of cryptocurrencies has also led to increased government enforcement activity. These actions evidence US regulators’ appetite to investigate fraud and other violations linked to cryptocurrency — often using traditional laws and regulations. Given this increased government scrutiny, financial institutions and traders should understand how regulators have policed the virtual world in the past in order to be prepared for the future. Government Enforcement Actions in the Cryptocurrency Space Unsurprisingly, government regulators, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), have become increasingly active in policing the cryptocurrency space. The below enforcement actions provide a bird’s-eye view of how the enforcement framework for cryptocurrencies
  • Motion Record of the Trustee (Returnable

    Motion Record of the Trustee (Returnable

    - 32 - cryptocurrency business. In its investigation and review of text and email communications, the Monitor noted that certain TPPs were instructed by Mr. Cotten to provide limited information to the financial institutions in relation to the intended use of the account and its association with the cryptocurrency industry to limit scrutiny by the financial institutions. 80. The Monitor identified a number of accounts that were frozen or closed subsequent to the financial institution becoming aware of the nature of the underlying transactions. The Monitor’s investigation indicates that frequently, Quadriga’s approach to addressing financial institution queries into the nature of the account usage was often to simply move on to another financial institution to avoid further questioning. 81. The Monitor’s investigation also identified many “cash” transactions where certain Users repeatedly funded their Accounts with large cash deposits. The Monitor has been advised that this involved the User physically handing cash in the form of legal tender to a representative of Quadriga. As an example, the Platform recorded $12.1 million of “In person Payments” received from one User through a series of nineteen (19) cash transactions over a 5-month period. The Monitor has been unable to verify how or if these cash deposits were appropriately deposited into the Quadriga treasury system through TPP accounts or other accounts. The Monitor has also reviewed communications which appear to indicate that Mr. Cotten sometimes credited a User’s account with a deposit with the understanding that the User would deliver cash at some point in the future. The deposits, once credited to the User’s Account, were subsequently used by the User to trade and remove Cryptocurrency off Platform.
  • A Model of Bimetallism

    A Model of Bimetallism

    Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Research Department A Model of Bimetallism François R. Velde and Warren E. Weber Working Paper 588 August 1998 ABSTRACT Bimetallism has been the subject of considerable debate: Was it a viable monetary system? Was it a de- sirable system? In our model, the (exogenous and stochastic) amount of each metal can be split between monetary uses to satisfy a cash-in-advance constraint, and nonmonetary uses in which the stock of un- coined metal yields utility. The ratio of the monies in the cash-in-advance constraint is endogenous. Bi- metallism is feasible: we find a continuum of steady states (in the certainty case) indexed by the constant exchange rate of the monies; we also prove existence for a range of fixed exchange rates in the stochastic version. Bimetallism does not appear desirable on a welfare basis: among steady states, we prove that welfare under monometallism is higher than under any bimetallic equilibrium. We compute welfare and the variance of the price level under a variety of regimes (bimetallism, monometallism with and without trade money) and find that bimetallism can significantly stabilize the price level, depending on the covari- ance between the shocks to the supplies of metals. Keywords: bimetallism, monometallism, double standard, commodity money *Velde, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago; Weber, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis and University of Minne- sota. We thank without implicating Marc Flandreau, Ed Green, Angela Redish, and Tom Sargent. The views ex- pressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, the Fed- eral Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, or the Federal Reserve System.
  • Beauty Is Not in the Eye of the Beholder

    Beauty Is Not in the Eye of the Beholder

    Insight Consumer and Wealth Management Digital Assets: Beauty Is Not in the Eye of the Beholder Parsing the Beauty from the Beast. Investment Strategy Group | June 2021 Sharmin Mossavar-Rahmani Chief Investment Officer Investment Strategy Group Goldman Sachs The co-authors give special thanks to: Farshid Asl Managing Director Matheus Dibo Shahz Khatri Vice President Vice President Brett Nelson Managing Director Michael Murdoch Vice President Jakub Duda Shep Moore-Berg Harm Zebregs Vice President Vice President Vice President Shivani Gupta Analyst Oussama Fatri Yousra Zerouali Vice President Analyst ISG material represents the views of ISG in Consumer and Wealth Management (“CWM”) of GS. It is not financial research or a product of GS Global Investment Research (“GIR”) and may vary significantly from those expressed by individual portfolio management teams within CWM, or other groups at Goldman Sachs. 2021 INSIGHT Dear Clients, There has been enormous change in the world of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology since we first wrote about it in 2017. The number of cryptocurrencies has increased from about 2,000, with a market capitalization of over $200 billion in late 2017, to over 8,000, with a market capitalization of about $1.6 trillion. For context, the market capitalization of global equities is about $110 trillion, that of the S&P 500 stocks is $35 trillion and that of US Treasuries is $22 trillion. Reported trading volume in cryptocurrencies, as represented by the two largest cryptocurrencies by market capitalization, has increased sixfold, from an estimated $6.8 billion per day in late 2017 to $48.6 billion per day in May 2021.1 This data is based on what is called “clean data” from Coin Metrics; the total reported trading volume is significantly higher, but much of it is artificially inflated.2,3 For context, trading volume on US equity exchanges doubled over the same period.
  • [ 543 ] V.—The Case for Bimetallism. by Joseph John Murphy. THE

    [ 543 ] V.—The Case for Bimetallism. by Joseph John Murphy. THE

    1891.] [ 543 ] V.—The Case for Bimetallism. By Joseph John Murphy. [Read Tuesday, 14th April, 1891.] THE question which this essay is an attempt to answer, may be thus expressed :—What would be the effect on prices, and on the financial and industrial interests of the world in general, if the leading nations of the world were to agree to make both gold and silver unlimited legal tender at the ratio of value between the two that prevailed during the seventy years which closed with 1873 >— namely, 15-5- ozs. silver as in France, or 16 ozs. as in the United States, equal to one oz. of gold ;—at the same time opening their mints to the unlimited and gratuitous coinage of both metals 1 The statistical data used in the present attempt to answer this question, are taken from the " Final Report of the Royal Com- mission, appointed to enquire into the recent changes in the relative values of the precious metals, 1888." The reply to such a question must of necessity be somewhat in- definite. The laws of political economy are laws of tendency only, though they are mathematical in their certainty, and almost mathe- matical in their nature; yet, as in many branches of physical science, we can predict the general character and the direction of the effects of given causes, but not their magnitude. In a word, their cer- tainty does not ensure precision. Before endeavouring to reply to this question, much preliminary exposition will be required. We do not, however, propose to begin at the very beginning of the theory of money.
  • Cryptocurrencies Exploring the Application of Bitcoin As a New Payment Instrument

    Cryptocurrencies Exploring the Application of Bitcoin As a New Payment Instrument

    Cryptocurrencies Exploring the Application of Bitcoin as a New Payment Instrument By Shinnecock Partners in association with Sophia Bak, Jimmy Yang, Peter Shea, and Neil Liu About the Authors Shinnecock Partners undertook this study of cryptocurrencies with the authors to understand this revolutionary payment system and related technology, explore its disruptive potential, and assess the merits of investing in it. Shinnecock Partners is a 25 year old investment boutique with an especial focus on niche investments offering higher returns with less risk than more traditional investments in long equities and bonds. Sophia Bak is an analyst intern at Shinnecock Partners. She is an MBA candidate at UCLA Anderson School of Management with a focus on Finance. Prior to Anderson, she spent five years at Mirae Asset Global Investments, working in equity research, global business strategy, and investment development. She holds a B.S. in Business Administration from Carnegie Mellon University with concentration in Computing and Information Technology. Jimmy Yang is a third-year undergraduate student at UCLA studying Business Economics and Accounting. Peter Shea is a third-year undergraduate student at UCLA studying Mathematics, Economics and Statistics. Neil Liu is a third-year undergraduate student at UCLA studying Applied Mathematics and Business Economics. Acknowledgements We are grateful to the individuals who shared their time and expertise with us. We want to thank John Villasenor, UCLA professor of Electrical Engineering and Public Policy, Brett Stapper and Brian Lowrance from Falcon Global Capital, and Tiffany Wan and Max Hoblitzell from Deloitte Consulting LLP. We also want to recognize Tracy Williams and Steven Kroll for their thoughtful feedback and support.
  • Into the Reverie: Exploration of the Dream Market

    Into the Reverie: Exploration of the Dream Market

    Into the Reverie: Exploration of the Dream Market Theo Carr1, Jun Zhuang2, Dwight Sablan3, Emma LaRue4, Yubao Wu5, Mohammad Al Hasan2, and George Mohler2 1Department of Mathematics, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 2Department of Computer & Information Science, Indiana University - Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN 3Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Guam, Guam 4Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, AK 5Department of Computer Science, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract—Since the emergence of the Silk Road market in Onymous" in 2014, a worldwide action taken by law enforce- the early 2010s, dark web ‘cryptomarkets’ have proliferated and ment and judicial agencies aimed to put a kibosh on these offered people an online platform to buy and sell illicit drugs, illicit behaviors [5]. Law enforcement interventions such as relying on cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin for anonymous trans- actions. However, recent studies have highlighted the potential for Onymous, along with exit scams and hacks, have successfully de-anonymization of bitcoin transactions, bringing into question shut down numerous cryptomarkets, including AlphaBay, Silk the level of anonymity afforded by cryptomarkets. We examine a Road, Dream, and more recently, Wall Street [6]. Despite these set of over 100,000 product reviews from several cryptomarkets interruptions, new markets have continued to proliferate. The collected in 2018 and 2019 and conduct a comprehensive analysis authors of [7] note that there appears to be a consistent daily of the markets, including an examination of the distribution of drug sales and revenue among vendors, and a comparison demand of about $500,000 for illicit products on the dark web, of incidences of opioid sales to overdose deaths in a US city.
  • Prism: Scaling Bitcoin by 10000

    Prism: Scaling Bitcoin by 10000

    Prism: Scaling Bitcoin by 10,000× Lei Yang∗ Vivek Bagaria† Gerui Wang‡ Mohammad Alizadeh∗ David Tse† Giulia Fanti§ Pramod Viswanath‡ ABSTRACT and throughput in the blockchain (§4). A recent theoretical paper Bitcoin is the first fully-decentralized permissionless blockchain described the core protocol and analyzed its security properties [6]. protocol to achieve a high level of security: the ledger it maintains While these theoretical results are promising, it is not clear has guaranteed liveness and consistency properties as long as the ad- how well they can translate into real-world performance. First, the versary has less compute power than the honest nodes. However, its Prism consensus protocol is much more complex than the longest throughput is only 7 transactions per second and the confirmation chain protocol: clients must maintain over 1000 distinct blockchains, latency can be up to hours. Prism is a new blockchain protocol that is which refer to each other to create an intricate directed acyclic graph designed to achieve a natural scaling of Bitcoin’s performance while (DAG) structure, and they must process blocks at very high rates maintaining its full security guarantees. We present an implementa- (e.g., 100-1000s of blocks per second at 100s of Mbps) to update these tion of Prism that achieves a throughput of over 70;000 transactions blockchains and confirm transactions. Second, Prism’s theoretical per second and confirmation latency of tens of seconds on networks analysis relies on several simplifying assumptions (e.g., round-based of up to 1000 EC2 Virtual Machines. The code can be found at [5].
  • Bitcoin: Technology, Economics and Business Ethics

    Bitcoin: Technology, Economics and Business Ethics

    Bitcoin: Technology, Economics and Business Ethics By Azizah Aljohani A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in partial fulfilment of the degree requirements of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN SYSTEM SCIENCE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ontario, Canada August 2017 © Azizah Aljohani, Ottawa, Canada, 2017 KEYWORDS: Virtual currencies, cryptocurrencies, blockchain, Bitcoin, GARCH model ABSTRACT The rapid advancement in encryption and network computing gave birth to new tools and products that have influenced the local and global economy alike. One recent and notable example is the emergence of virtual currencies, also known as cryptocurrencies or digital currencies. Virtual currencies, such as Bitcoin, introduced a fundamental transformation that affected the way goods, services, and assets are exchanged. As a result of its distributed ledgers based on blockchain, cryptocurrencies not only offer some unique advantages to the economy, investors, and consumers, but also pose considerable risks to users and challenges for regulators when fitting the new technology into the old legal framework. This paper attempts to model the volatility of bitcoin using 5 variants of the GARCH model namely: GARCH(1,1), EGARCH(1,1) IGARCH(1,1) TGARCH(1,1) and GJR-GARCH(1,1). Once the best model is selected, an OLS regression was ran on the volatility series to measure the day of the week the effect. The results indicate that the TGARCH (1,1) model best fits the volatility price for the data. Moreover, Sunday appears as the most significant day in the week. A nontechnical discussion of several aspects and features of virtual currencies and a glimpse at what the future may hold for these decentralized currencies is also presented.
  • Executive Summary Background Information What Is Bitcoin? What Is

    Executive Summary Background Information What Is Bitcoin? What Is

    Executive Summary Details surrounding the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto and the origins of Bitcoin have emerged from a Florida court case, Kleiman v Wright. The plaintiff, Ira Kleiman, is suing the defendant, Craig Steven Wright (CSW) for the rights to Bitcoin tokens and Bitcoin related intellectual property. Ira alleges that his deceased brother Dave Kleiman was CSW’s partner in the development of Bitcoin and Bitcoin related IP. Implicit in this allegation is that CSW created Bitcoin and has access to Satoshi’s Bitcoins currently valued ~$10B. CSW has made it clear that his intention is to sell his BTC in favor of his preferred version of Bitcoin, BSV, which is more aligned with the original design. If this occurs it will have massive market ramifications on the order of hundreds of billions of dollars. Court case details support CSW’s claim to be Satoshi. This contrasts the opinion of many industry leaders who don’t believe that CSW is Satoshi or that he can follow through on his threat to sell BTC for BSV. The conflict around the Satoshi identity ties into a larger conflict about the purpose of Bitcoin and the role of law in Bitcoin. Background Information What is Bitcoin? What is BTC? Bitcoin is a revolutionary peer-to-peer network and electronic cash system. Over its 10 year ​ history, Bitcoin tokens have appreciated from being effectively worthless to having a market cap of over $315 billion. BTC is the predominant ticker symbol of the Bitcoin token. Others, like BSV and BCH exist through a process called forking.
  • Cryptocurrency: the Economics of Money and Selected Policy Issues

    Cryptocurrency: the Economics of Money and Selected Policy Issues

    Cryptocurrency: The Economics of Money and Selected Policy Issues Updated April 9, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45427 SUMMARY R45427 Cryptocurrency: The Economics of Money and April 9, 2020 Selected Policy Issues David W. Perkins Cryptocurrencies are digital money in electronic payment systems that generally do not require Specialist in government backing or the involvement of an intermediary, such as a bank. Instead, users of the Macroeconomic Policy system validate payments using certain protocols. Since the 2008 invention of the first cryptocurrency, Bitcoin, cryptocurrencies have proliferated. In recent years, they experienced a rapid increase and subsequent decrease in value. One estimate found that, as of March 2020, there were more than 5,100 different cryptocurrencies worth about $231 billion. Given this rapid growth and volatility, cryptocurrencies have drawn the attention of the public and policymakers. A particularly notable feature of cryptocurrencies is their potential to act as an alternative form of money. Historically, money has either had intrinsic value or derived value from government decree. Using money electronically generally has involved using the private ledgers and systems of at least one trusted intermediary. Cryptocurrencies, by contrast, generally employ user agreement, a network of users, and cryptographic protocols to achieve valid transfers of value. Cryptocurrency users typically use a pseudonymous address to identify each other and a passcode or private key to make changes to a public ledger in order to transfer value between accounts. Other computers in the network validate these transfers. Through this use of blockchain technology, cryptocurrency systems protect their public ledgers of accounts against manipulation, so that users can only send cryptocurrency to which they have access, thus allowing users to make valid transfers without a centralized, trusted intermediary.
  • Crypto Garage Developed and Executed the Contract of a P2P

    Crypto Garage Developed and Executed the Contract of a P2P

    April 19, 2019 Crypto Garage, Inc. NEWS RELEASE Crypto Garage Developed and Executed the Contract of a P2P Protocol Based Crypto Asset Derivative Settled in Bitcoin 〜Executed First Derivative Contract with Blockstream〜 Crypto Garage, Inc. (HQ: Tokyo; Representative Director: Masahito Okuma; Crypto Garage), a Fintech company developing blockchain financial services and also a subsidiary of Digital Garage, Inc. (TSE first section: 4819; HQ: Tokyo; Representative Director, President Executive Officer and Group CEO: Kaoru Hayashi; DG) developed a peer-to- peer crypto asset derivative contract protocol and executed a contract based on this protocol on the Bitcoin Blockchain. Blockstream Corporation (HQ: Victoria Canada; CEO: Adam Back; Blockstream), the global leader in blockchain technology and financial cryptography, and Crypto Garage entered into a derivative contract that locks the future Bitcoin price [on a collared basis] in order to hedge the Bitcoin price fluctuation risk against the US dollar. Crypto Garage developed a P2P derivative technology based on the Discreet Log Contracts (https://dci.mit.edu/smart-contracts) that Thaddeus Dryja from MIT Digital Currency Initiatives proposed. This contract is a smart contract applied on the Bitcoin Blockchain and requires the agreement and posting of collateral by both parties. The agreed terms and collateral are defined on the Bitcoin Blockchain. Since settlement is cryptographically secured, this contract minimizes counterparty risk, such as breach of contract and other contract termination events. Contact: Hiroshi Ikemoto, Leo Shiraishi, Corporate Communication Dept., Digital Garage, Inc. Email: [email protected], TEL: +81-3-6367-1101 April 19, 2019 Crypto Garage, Inc. NEWS RELEASE The bitcoin price for the maturity date is determined by the ICE Cryptocurrency Data Feed, as agreed upon by both parties in advance.