Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease Review The Drugs of Sleeping Sickness: Their Mechanisms of Action and Resistance, and a Brief History Harry P. De Koning Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK;
[email protected]; Tel.: +44-141-3303753 Received: 19 December 2019; Accepted: 16 January 2020; Published: 19 January 2020 Abstract: With the incidence of sleeping sickness in decline and genuine progress being made towards the WHO goal of eliminating sleeping sickness as a major public health concern, this is a good moment to evaluate the drugs that ‘got the job done’: their development, their limitations and the resistance that the parasites developed against them. This retrospective looks back on the remarkable story of chemotherapy against trypanosomiasis, a story that goes back to the very origins and conception of chemotherapy in the first years of the 20 century and is still not finished today. Keywords: sleeping sickness; human African trypanosomiasis; trypanosoma brucei; drugs; drug resistance; history 1. Introduction The first clue towards understanding drug sensitivity and, conversely, resistance, in human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) is that most drugs are very old and quite simply toxic to any cell—if they can enter it. That places the mechanisms of uptake at the centre of selectivity, toxicity and resistance issues for all the older trypanocides such as diamidines (e.g., pentamidine, pafuramidine, diminazene), suramin and the melaminophenyl arsenicals. Significantly, none of these drug classes, dating from the 1910s to the 1940s, were designed for a specific intracellular target and even today identification of their targets has defied all attempts with advanced postgenomic, proteomic and metabolomic techniques—in short, they are examples of polypharmacology, where the active agent acts on multiple cellular targets.