Posted on Authorea 3 Jun 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.158716290.04813939/v2 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. norcretsinickolde n seto utrladtcnlgcleouini h dao the of idea the based is rejected evolution technological be and cannot cultural scale of Kardashev aspect the One could forces on knowledge. natural scientific envisaged that technological current as hypothesis and and our the in entities cultural on Thus, adaptations elsewhere that intelligent doubt universe. effective advanced create the to be very in reason to would elsewhere no create evolution selection effective seems be natural there of Similarly, also that would power 2019). believe evolution al. the to et reason of (Levin than every universe evidence is the rather provides there forces and humans scientific life, natural of intelligent by existence emerged further, very seem have ideas such The would could be consider it God to may being. is that us extraterrestrials essay supernatural interstellar idea to this a that the of but be suggest purpose develop omniscient, The to and and extended 2019 ). discuss (Richey omnipotent was and descriptors idea be their This on not based 2002). need any or God (Shermer entity humans reworded God this indistinguish- to was be is Perhaps that This intelligence to extraterrestrial is God. advanced 1973). adage sufficiently to from (Clarke any well-known and able that magic A 2015), suggestion from Cirkovic the 1999). in indistinguishable 2003 ; paraphrased (Zubrin (Galantai is universes energy technology powerful new advanced than civilizations create advanced sufficiently develop- other to and to criteria refinements extensions or involving Many upward universes respectively. scales including multiple galaxy, considered own control consumptions its been energy to and have to enough star, scale correspond own the III its civi- and of Earth, of II, ments as development I, such technological Points planet the a consumption. describes for energy special, which their a to scale occupy according ). 1996 three-point humans lizations (Rowan-Robinson a that exam- universe introduced assuming (for the for (1964) cosmology of universe. justification Kardashev observers in the clear investigated as in no widely position is alone principle, privileged there not Copernican or that are 2008), the unique we al. with that et accord belief Clarkson in the ple, the to also in obstacle is scientific common belief little This be however Webb may example, is (for life There civilizations intelligent unresolved. extraterrestrial that of evidence expectation scientific the firm 2015; little between being conflict there with the universe is paradox Fermi Universe The the in Elsewhere Civilizations clear Advanced not is it practice, religious of this viewpoint in religions. the God major from viewing to However, of be advantage acceptable to possible with. be greatness A would dispensed sufficient God discussed. of be is a be might scale such God perhaps supernatural the of whether could universes, idea the entity of multiple this advanced that extensions of of an is feasibility existence Postulated Such way theological eternal inevitable. and an scale. scientific be In The may galactic universes. entity God. a new an create such to to of up enough emergence powerful energy the are consume envisages that and scale entities Kardashev advanced control The consider may civilizations. extraterrestrial that advanced civilizations of existence advanced possible the concerns paradox Fermi The Abstract 2020 3, June 1 Skibinski F. O. David Theology the to to Relation Extensions in and Scale Paradox Kardashev Fermi the on Thoughts Some wne University Swansea .Teei ocerspotfrayepaaino h aao n hsi remains it thus and paradox the of explanation any for support clear no is There Cirkovi´c2018). ´ 1 1 Posted on Authorea 3 Jun 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.158716290.04813939/v2 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. da a niaeacetro u nvreo ol,i sntgnrlyevsgdta hscreator this that envisaged generally not is it these world, all or Although universe galaxy. own our its of of scale creator the a on created energy is envisage simulation possessing simulation may the civilization are a that For Kardashev ideas in who considers living III extraterrestrials hypothesis are Type by latter it. we a This created that see by reserve proposes 2000 ). we or hypothesis (Baxter planetarium extraterrestrials zoo as The by Fermi a world created the is 1973). our of (Ball Earth us manufacturing solutions that observing Some proposes for was secretly hypothesis 1). universe responsible zoo Appendix own are the in stories our example, extraterrestrials examples fiction created science that (see Many universe properties envisage 2015). godlike another paradox Vidal with from 2010; entities Gribbin civilization portray 1995; also or Harrison example, entity (for advanced previously an proposed that idea Multiverse The a in God of Emergence a of be existence advanced thus generating eternal universe could an given It in any of time probability 2019). single some low. the at Kragh genuine if is a even no somewhere entities 1976; universes, that evolve in of Kane principle will number an than plenitude entity 1976; infinite the advanced in (Lovejoypotentially greater to an unfulfilled arising made be such be remain universes that also should can inevitable new can universe) appeal being controlling context, large of this and In potentiality infinitely creating size. an of finite of (including capable universe entity multiverse advanced large or existence an infinitely nature the of of the proofs of likelihood in discussion and The discussed in 2010) been used (Kraay Kraay worlds 2019). 2011; been has possible (Spitzer (Megill also multiverse and evil God have the realism of of ideas modal problem created Multiverse involving the have God to ). of multiverse as not 2020 existence the well may Rogers of as relevance or ; 2019 philosophy the Ignatova may and has 2013; as theology God 2015), in that 2003). Chan analysis Vaas2008; possibility and (Page2004; is The investigation Smolin idea for and 1997; Another physics. area universes, (Smolin substantial in pocket universes 2008). of a offspring of Page is spawn consisting number ; 2003 multiverse every may Tegmark infinite multiverse universes The with (see an within a infinite mechanics with holes quantum is in inflation black of universe eternal that entities interpretation our it, advanced worlds that of many of idea part the the some emergence include in the realised theories to possibility Multiverse advanced an extended universes. of of individual universe. orders be emergence many small many can of a very than likelihood reasoning to are large the This universe 2011) a equal, observable al. in being the et greater things to (Vardanyan be Other relative greater should advanced universe entity times 1997). of observable entire 251 (Guth evolution the the greater around just the of than magnitude from of size rather ranging the likelihood universe uncertain entire of The communica- the the Estimates also whether if considered. to included. higher and are apply is be light civilizations, should estimates universe of future entities Frank the speed or and 2009 ; whether civilizations the Forgan past Kardashev include as 2001; include Considerations made, such Wilson universe, constraints 1992; assumptions observable 2018). tion Sobel many the al. and the or suchDrake et Way to example, approaches Milky Sandberg according (for using 2016 ; considerably zero civilizations Sullivan vary to extraterrestrial and estimates millions of from These number range the equation. and Drake of the made as been have estimates Multiverses Many and see we Universes as in everything and Civilizations universe Advanced the create to consistent past less distant thus the the is in It of acted universe. concept who the use the and God main now. humanity its a Although of it 2019), of fate Costa notion future (da 2007). the the evolution (Grumett human with with final past concerned Point future in and that events Omega a prospective is to towards is the applied idea universe be related the called may and a singularity unification humans context technological leading spiritual theological evolution a of envisaged In who point surpassing Chardin far 2005). de superintelligence Kurzweil Teilhard a 1993; of to (Vinge leading capabilities process human runaway current a envisages which singularity technological 2 Posted on Authorea 3 Jun 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.158716290.04813939/v2 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. ol ecasfida uentrl ie htw antpeittesinickoldeo h future the of knowledge scientific the predict include cannot now could which we forces phenomena that be for These Given instead explanation theories. scientific would supernatural. a scientific as God provide would in classified could there explanation. out which be entity and natural set would science, natural beyond forces to advanced and natural was unknown immortal yet maximally the supernatural and Supernatural those of a be gods consequence were to as inevitable being. God God such an for phenomena If supernatural requirement religious a no ). 2012 of scientific is range be Svedholm violates that wide and God something a (Lindeman to that includes refers souls and now is and knowledge nature, belief and beyond principles religious meaning concept much religious a of originally part Supernatural important the An and God Emerging Naturally similar A some in undisturbed restricted “galactic were ours evidence. God a scientific like emerging for that planets naturally search considers a life-bearing the by leave frustrate hypothesis, revelations could to interdict the this If decided way, the advanced have 2015). by paradox, Webb revelation might on Fermi 1987; of civilizations focus (Fogg evidence the to advanced direct does be of detect multiverse of would to explanation now the club” try testing to One of and and evidence out paradox to Fermi emerging entities. approach the God best 2003). of Tegmark the natural analysis Perhaps 2006; scientific position a (Pagethe present. advanced for predictions at maximally multiple predictions feasible testable required look both give testable the not do of of at theories evidence generation Multiverse such be require the that scale. these may However, type evidence within could God Kardashev direct entities emerging But extraterrestrial a advanced no naturally also on of any is a but hypothesis that there of The and if reason, hypothesis even universes naturally. and scientifically? The knowledge tested revelation emerged scientific exist. be current through has civilizations God with only God consistent emerging not is this naturally civilizations God a that of this given hypothesis of investigation the conception this scientific that a through is at potentially universes arrive between could universes communication between for Religions laws 2016). interaction speculation physical (Blonde of One whatever wormholes feasibility by via the contain. constrained be to they might relation be gods in Another to the God multiverse need between gods. single the would and of a collaboration within multitude involve processes generate operational might this Such to be Another within way could gods. merging gods. one between between of Perhaps selection agreement process natural gods. and a and many imagine competition have involve to might which be way religions would advancement. greatness with of maximal line stages various of in at universes the gods and be multiverse of being. have the multitude could supernatural of would a This laws imply a however scientific God may and be other emerging possibilities properties not physical Unlimited or naturally the would involved. by own The but set our be God, may God. in be greatness Maximal is arising truly the thus believing entity towards and into advanced advanced tends God God deceived highly example, emerging of be a For naturally properties the towards may the have we that than God. not is that would rather is essay they universe greatness this which but in maximal entity us, focus capable of deceive great The may scale entity maximally hypotheses Kardashev God. planetarium of a a and greatness on and zoo maximal entity universes the advanced in an or as of worlds extraterrestrials, emergence extended the an between creating as drawn such of be being scale can a a infinite distinction on potentially as A greatness inevitable. omnipotence a God maximal be in as this considers also evolution such principle, could for qualities Anselm plenitude scale possibilities in St the Karadashev unlimited be and of the can universes perfect Many to proof greatness of or again the where number great appealing principle. thought”, maximally example, So, plenitude or be For omniscience. supremely can the and a greater 2018). to be nothing technological Oppy to also which and God example, entity“than natural appeal consider for of this with God power that (see of and the and existence being given universes, multiverse, the happening of a of this proofs in infinity of ontological as inevitability naturally potential a emerged universes, the the as has on of greatness evolution, is God number sufficient Emphasis infinite of to entity God. potentially alternative advanced is a an an that from representing is inevitably entity essay and this advanced in an considered idea as The more depicted is creator creator. The God. 3 Posted on Authorea 3 Jun 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.158716290.04813939/v2 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. eif fmjrrlgosrte hno h ieecs uha eifo o ntesupernatural. the the in and not belief or in this belief as between belief such similarities rationalize differences, the to the to on perspective, than attached this rather be by From religions evidenced could major impartial, 1987). emphasis of is (Smith God, beliefs revelation religions in emerging God great naturally that one unity the a the underlying emerging to of the that naturally necessary emphasizes a survival and Perennialism strictly in disclose, long-term belief it religions belief? could Is religious between religions, of major similarities of tolerated? totality to the and diversity the be great acceptable naturally into the belief emerged subsumed or Given has be this with God that God? Could consistent God supernatural be practice? a a could in in or universes believe faith perspectives multiple and religious of belief or the existence religions whether eternal ask an to in is inevitably essay scientific this unknown for yet motive as to One appeal naturally to (Appendix need render attributes the the without perhaps of God Some could emerging forces. naturally knowledge the a matter. organized with this of of compatible creation create of seem extension universes or to 2) transformation Exploitation an then other through involves and miracles, in called particles, 1998). scale are elementary or (Barrowwhat Kardashev to Universe them the down entities our cannot of from smaller now in version complexity and we One elsewhere smaller that control civilisations knowledge. way to ability Other such a of possess stream in how future. our already disembodied scientifically the perhaps science. may preserved understand example, of current to For be knowledge humans through scientific could processes. of the natural imagine memories descendants by predict associated the realised to with for appeal be possible could consciousness possible God, not features emerging be is and might naturally it attributes it a that these future to idea and the features the souls in heaven, and to Thus, as attributes made such these be features associate again demand to could also theological including attempting religions of 2), In Many subject Appendix the millennia. miracles. been (see over have attributes importance debate twenty-eight their philosophical lists and and attributes Christianity These Wikipedia in the omniscience. God example, and For of omnipotence demanding. attributes and the substantial and evil extremely on emerging are of article theism naturally explicable in problem a God potentially the between of requirements is force example The which in for differ removed process God, not is a do argument of by God. revelations, This existence inconsistent naturally supernatural supernatural. the from emerged the argument against God in the arguments of believe and that God other to assumed the rational Perhaps that asks is not believe perhaps scientifically. it is who deism atheists this it if not those and that weakened but of is miracles, argument theism or exist One or In not naturally. revelations emerged made does 2010). supernatural that theism Kraay deliberately God through 2002; who a universe of (Holder goodness the more life and much envisages in In sustaining knowledge Theism notion intervene of power theism. the will capability unsurpassable 2011). include than God the (Gomes of can deism universe with creator and in our universe and religion of acceptable our designer of running more the a aspects be in as rational little may and God intervened God foundational God emerging creation most after naturally the that on a is of emphasis idea deism the Belief sight Religious first At and God Emerging Naturally entail necessarily A God. not emerging might multiverse naturally eternity a the If from to God 1999). prior of is Barbour emergence or 1994; and natural precedes (Rogers time the multiverse of context then existence the scientific very future, explanations havethat and The or causal to theological 2018). all past then a (Adams that no control and both thesis God’s has multiverse, sovereignty in under the the is debated with exists to is accord naturally that prior in all eternity a and a and for be need God outside on would to no This insist be back satisfying see may trace to they things. be believers and all God may God religious and want a many it may God such However, created they in supernatural have science. Instead they a of faith God. to ambit strong emerging alternative the the of within an because God as God brings supernatural God it emerging as has naturally some or to a have supernatural would is of God God existence whether reasons The differ or not motives need The perhaps be. us might naturally. consequently forces emerged and these universe what our yet making know for cannot we 1961) (Popper 4 Posted on Authorea 3 Jun 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.158716290.04813939/v2 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 3 2)Rbr .Ryod e ytmtcTelg fteCrsinFih(n d,Nashville: ed., (2nd Faith Christian 1949), the Truth, of of Theology Banner Inquiry Systematic The An (London: New Exploring The Theology Morey, A God: Carson, Systematic A. of Reymond, A. Berkhof, Robert Nature L. D. Louis (23) The Robert (21) (24) Wierenga, (25) 203. 55. 65. R. God, p. 43. Edward p. of 1989), (22) God, Love Nelson, Press, Of the 68. University Thomas Attributes of (Cornell God, Nashville: Attributes Doctrine of ed., Divine Love Difficult (2nd Into The the Faith Carson, of Robert Thomas Christian (19) A. Eerd- Doctrine and the D. 27. Difficult Rapids: Keating of Today, (20) Church Grand F. Theology the James 179. Systematic for (17) 1998), New Confession Suffering. Westminster A Human 63. The Ward, of Reymond, God, 279. S. Mystery Theology, L. of Rowland the Christian Love (18) Erickson, and the 2009. Impassibility Millard of mans, Divine (15) Doctrine (eds.), Difficult 146. Theology, White The God, Systematic Joseph Carson, Grudem, of Wayne A. Doctrine b of D. to:a The Holiness up (16) Bavinck, The Jump Herman Sproul, Systematic (13) C. (14) Berkhof, R. 38. Louis 267. (12) 1986), Foundation, (10) Encyclopedia. Press Jewish 197. (Scripture Theology, God Shelosh-’Esreh”. Systematic Middot, (11) Grudem, Wayne 70-72. Theology, (9) 168. Theology, tematic Simplicity (43); (52). Righteousness Wrath (51); (41,42); Veracity Providence Om- (49,50); Trinity (37); (40); (48); Omnipotence Transcendence Oneness (33-36); (45-47); Mystery Sovereignty (39); (31,32); (25); (44); Omniscience Mission Incorporeality (29,30); (38); (24); Love (28); Incomprehensibility nipresence Jealousy (22,23); 27); Impeccability (26, Infinity (17-21); Impassibility (14-16); ity other cosmic and 2 a universe, form Appendix narrator’s to the planets including other Universes of of inhabitants creator of heaven. a and those Maker hell with Star like merges universes the narrator meets human which the mind of omniscient not mind by but The decides Stapledon omnipotent and Olaf laws. is lives rational by g he from Maker” Mr whom humans “Star with humanity. exempt Deva intelligent to and rival with a Penelope universe by uncle a challenged and create is aunt and to his error by Lightman and disturbed Alan trial is by g) Creation” planet (Mr single the material God a About the Novel into of A merge disappearance children g: human the “Mr super- of and to minds Overmind begin The the and spacecraft joining affairs. in for human Earth. arrive preparation in Overmind intervene in the to consciousness called sometimes intelligence and cosmic vise vast a Clarke serving C. a Aliens Arthur light. with was out parallel by there dies universe And End” in the LIGHT!” “Childhood’s universe, As BE THERE the humanity. “LET throughout with pronounces fuse Multivac spread eventually ultimate is which the Multivac AC that called descendent computers of godlike succession a produces Asimov Humanity Isaac by Question” Last “The godlike or superintelligences include that stories fiction entities science of Examples 1 Appendix siy() triy() odes(,0;Gaiuns 1) oies(2;Imnne(3;Immutabil- (13); Immanence (12); Holiness (11); Graciousness (9,10); Goodness (8); Eternity (7); Aseity ubr bv r xcl hs nteWkpdarfrnels eo.bgniga ubr7. number at beginning below. list reference Wikipedia the in those exactly are above Numbers 7 .A asn h agn fGd(rn ais odra) 96 8 an rdm Sys- Grudem, Wayne (8) 1996. Zondervan), Rapids: (Grand God of Gagging The Carson, A. D. (7) Atiue fGdi hitaiy,tknfo iiei Arl2020) (April Wikipedia from taken Christianity”, in God of “Attributes 5 Posted on Authorea 3 Jun 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.158716290.04813939/v2 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. ...d ot.RveigteCneto ehooia iglrte:HwCnI xli Human Explain It Can How Singularities: Principle. Technological of Copernican Concept the the of Reviewing test general Costa. A da D.P.G. Lu. T.H. and Bassett, B. Clarkson, C. Clarke. A.C. Improvement. for Room M.M. with Vehicle Fine A 50+: at Classification Kardashev’s Cirkovic. Multiverse? M.M. through intelligence? Universe for our Create fine-tuning God minimal Would the Chan. from M.H. start life eternal paradox. an Fermi Can the of Blonde. Resolution W. a Hypothesis: Planetarium The Baxter. S. Barrow. J. Barbour. J. Hypothesis. Zoo Nature. Ball. of J.A. Laws the of Account An Essentialism: Dispositional and God Adams. D. Autographa”. the of Inerrancy “The References Bahnsen, Greg (51) Painter John. John 3 205. (50) Theology, publishers, and 120. Truth Systematic 2, Family. Grudem, p. of Trinity, 1, Wayne the Banner the (52) Harrington, on Understanding Transcendent. Focus J. McGrath, God Daniel Alister Plan”. Machen, Sovereign (49) and Gresham Gateway. (44) Archived God’s 0-85151-355-7. J. Faith in ISBN God (48) 9780745937977. Praying?”. Place 1998. Of ISBN Keep 2019. Its Sovereignty “Why January and 102. The Robert. 22 “Prayer Morris, p. Retrieved Pink, (47) (46) W. Said. January2019. Machine. Wayback 21 Really A. of World the Retrieved Paul University (45) at of St 2013, Dictionary What 177-178. Providence”. 12, Oxford March Theology, (1997). Concise Attributes: Systematic The T. “Divine in N. Grudem, Providence Wright, J. Wayne Women’s (42) (43) 61. Alfred IVP 2013. The 1949), Freddoso, February (40) Truth, Religions. (41) 17 of 68. Retrieved 1949), Banner Truth, 96. Dame. Pain of (London: Notre of Banner Problem Theology p. (London: The Systematic Commentary, Lewis, Theology Berkhof, S. Bible Systematic C. Berkhof, Louis (37) Louis 61. (38) Mystery, (Berdiaev), (39) accessed and Berdyaev Berdyaev.com, Models In- 16. A. Janos, Ramsey, Theological S. 1966), N. T. (Fontana, Ian (35) Fr. in (36) translator Theology” 100,102. #321), 2009. in Stacy 11, - 12, November William Methodology (1927 vol. Theodicy” (33) on 1991), (Westminster Concerning “Reflections Theology Ltd., Consideration 36. Todd of Rahner, “A Foundations & p. Karl Postmodern Longman Narrative, (34) the (Darton, Grand and vestigations, 5. Bible’s Barth Christopher 1997), p. the Karl (32) Knox, Unlocking 2013), Engaging God: John 390. Press, of (eds), God: 1991), (Evangelical Mystery Schweitzer of Books, The evangelical Orbis M. Mission Johnson, influential William The (Maryknoll: Wright, an Mission and Transforming H. of Campbell Bosch, ISBN J. dance’ theology J. D. ‘divine David 10. the Iain the (31) The through p. in is 106. Thinking [2000]. Dance: Press. Trinity?” (2010) Inter-Varsity the the Keller: Arthur “Losing London: of Donald Bidwell, with J. Carson, explanation ed.). Kevin (29) revised good Francis, (reprint, 154. a (30) & (Taylor God p. 978-1-844-74427-5. of God God, ISBN on Love of Knowing Perspectives 1-84474427-2. the Packer, Existence Infinity” of I. The Mathematical J. Nagasawa, Doctrine Yujin (28) and Difficult (27) “God 111. (1998). Kneale, p. 50 2011), Brendan Faith (26) Christian and 167. Science 1998), Nelson, Thomas Evolution? Letters 2018. Journal Astronomical 2015. Cosmology Society Interplanetary Quarterly Cirkovi´c. ´ 0:131 2008. 101:011301, , mosblt:Lmt fSineadteSineo Limits of Science the and Science of Limits Impossibility: 92336 2018. 99:293–316, , h n fTime of End The 72–8 2016. 17:26–38, , rfie fteFtr:A nur noteLmt ftePossible the of Limits the into Inquiry An Future: the of Profiles Nanoethics h ra iec:sineadpiooh fFrisparadox Fermi’s of philosophy and science silence: great The 9:–5 2015. 191:1–15, , 42026 2000. 54:210–216, , 31910 2019. 13:119–130, , Icarus xodUiest rs,1999. Press, University Oxford . 93739 1973. 19:347–349, , 6 hooyadScience and Theology xodUiest rs,1998. Press, University Oxford . xodUiest Press, University Oxford . oua irr,1973. Library, Popular . ora fteBritish the of Journal aicPhilosophical Pacific hsclReview Physical hlspyand Philosophy 13:395–408, , Serbian Posted on Authorea 3 Jun 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.158716290.04813939/v2 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. .Guet eladd hri’ vltoayntrltheology. Guth. natural A.H. evolutionary Chardin’s de Teilhard Grumett. D. 2003. September author, Gribbin. of J. website on pdf Deism. Civilizations. Gomes. IV A.W. Type and Futures Long Galantai. Z. ..Rce.Gda h nwrt em’ aao.pfi adtn aaie pi 2019. Philosophy. April Medieval Magazine, + Sandstone Duration in no pdf has Paradox. Eternity Fermi’s Rogers. to K.A. Answer the as God Richey. R.R. arXiv:0801.0246. 2008. Multiverse. Popper. the love K.R. so arXiv:hep-th/0610101v1. God 2006. Does theories. Page. multiverse D.N. of tests and Predictions Page. D.N. Oppy. G. response. universes many the and Evil Megill. J. Su- and Magical Superstitious, Paranormal, Lovejoy. A.O. Term? a in What’s Svedholm. M. A. and Lindeman aliens. M. Darwin’s West. S.A. and Cooper, H.S. Scott, T.W. Levin, S.R. Kurzweil. Elements. R. Chemical and Philosophy Plenitude Kragh. H. meta-argument. multiverse Megill’s multiverse. Kraay. the K.J. and worlds, possible Theism, Kraay. Civilizations. K.J. Extraterrestrial by Information of Transmission Theism. Kardashev. Skeptical Reason. N.S. in Sufficient and Worlds) Plenitude (Multiple Nature, Kane. Multiverse R.H. a of Concept The Ignatova. theism. N.Y. and universes multiple life. Fine-tuning, intelligent Holder. containing R.D. universes of selection natural The Harrison. E.R. in Species Technological of Prevalence the on Constraint Empirical New A Sullivan. intelligence. W.T. and and life Frank A. extraterrestrial of Interdict hypotheses The for - testbed Civilizations numerical Galactic A 1st Forgan. the D.H. Among Interaction the of Aspects Temporal Fogg. M.J. Sobel. D. and Drake F. o h rnir fReality of Frontiers the for 2–3,2011. 127–138, 1976. Press, Same. the Mean Would Name Other 2012. Any 241–255, by Beliefs pernatural ology 2013. 235–241, 1964. 217–221, Journal University Society Astronomical Royal Universe. the Astrobiology of Journal Hypothesis. 1992. Delta, 819 2019. 18:1–9, , nooia ruet eie yOp,G.) Oppy, by (edited Arguments Ontological nSac fteMlies:Prle ols idnDmnin,adteUtmt Quest Ultimate the and Dimensions, Hidden Worlds, Parallel Multiverse: the of Search In h nainr nvre h us o e hoyo omcorigins cosmic of theory new a for quest the universe: inflationary The h iglrt sNear is Singularity The h oet fHistoricism of Poverty The h ra hi fBig td fteHsoyo nIe [1936] Idea an of History the of Study A Being: of Chain Great The Icarus Astrobiology 49:512 2019. (439):95–102, , 93034 1987. 69:370–384, , h nylpdao hita Civilization Christian of Encyclopedia The sAyn u hr?TeSinicSac o xrtretilIntelligence Extraterrestrial for Search Scientific The There? Out Anyone Is :2–3,2009. 8:121–131, , 63932 2016. 16:359–362, , ie,2010. Wiley, . 61323 1995. 36:193–203, , egi,2005. Penguin, . oteg,1961. Routledge, . nentoa ora o hlspyo Religion of Philosophy for Journal International nentoa ora o hlspyo Religion of Philosophy for Journal International 7 mrcnPioohclQuarterly Philosophical American oteg,2018. Routledge, . hlspia Studies Philosophical Hyle Nous 512,2019. 25:1–20, , 62532 2002. 36:295–312, , eiiu Studies Religious 2011. , Zygon eiwo eea Psychology General of Review nentoa ora fAstrobi- of Journal International 25954 2007. 42:519–534, , urel ora fthe of Journal Quarterly 4:5–6,2010. 147:355–368, , 011,1994. 30:1–16, , oitAstronomy Soviet avr University Harvard . ai ok,1997. Books, Basic . 32–1 1976. 13:23–31, , International os State Tomsk 16: , 73: , 70: , 8: , . Posted on Authorea 3 Jun 2020 — The copyright holder is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse without permission. — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.158716290.04813939/v2 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. .Zubrin. intelligence. R. extraterrestrial for search The Wilson. T.L. .Vne h oigTcnlgclSnuaiy o oSriei h otHmnEa nG.A. In Era. Post-Human the Webb. S. in Survive to How Singularity: Technological Coming editor, Dick, The S.J. In Vinge. life. V. extraterrestrial of discovery and the curvature for the model to impact averaging multidimensional A model Bayesian Vidal. C. of Applications Silk. P.A. J. In and Trotta, universes. R. habitable Vardanyan, M. of origin the and selection darwinian cosmological of J.D. Problems In Vaas. Era. R. Post-Human the in Survive to How Singularity: Technological Coming The Tegmark. God. M. of Existence the for Proof Metaphysical Contemporary A universe. Spitzer. the R.J. of complexity the for explanation the as selection natural Cosmological Smolin. Lee Smolin. Lee Philosophy. Perennial a there indistinguish- Is is Smith. intelligence H. extraterrestrial advanced arXiv:1806.02404v1. sufficiently Any 2018. - Paradox. law Fermi last the Shermer’s Dissolving Shermer. Ord. M. T. and Drexler, E. Sandberg, A. Rowan-Robinson. M. multiverse. the and theism Classical Rogers. K.A. em aao n h rbe fEtaersra Life Extraterrestrial of Problem the and Paradox Fermi 1993. CP-10129, Publication editor, Landis, Earth Beyond Life Discovering of Impact The Universe. the of size editors, 2003. Giminez, Springer, A.) 485–486. and DiLella, L. (Shaver, birthday 90th Wheeler’s editors, John Harper, honoring C.L. Cosmos, and Davies, P.C.W. Barrow, Quarterly Applications its and Mechanics Statistical A: 1987. god. from able 2020. fteUies sTeigwt les. hr sEeyoy eet-ieSltost the to Solutions Seventy-Five Everybody? is Where Aliens... with Teeming is Universe the If h ra iec:sineadpiooh fFrisparadox Fermi’s of philosophy and science silence: great The 94746 2019. 59:427–466, , h ieo h Cosmos the of Life The iin2:ItricpiaySineadEgneigi h r fCyberspace of Era the in Engineering and Science Interdisciplinary Vision-21: cetfi American Scientific Cosmology otl oie fteRylAtooia Society Astronomical Royal the of Notices Monthly xodUiest rs,1996. Press, University Oxford . xodUiest rs,1997. Press, University Oxford . 8:33,2002. 286:33–33, , ora fteAeia cdm fReligion of Academy American the of Journal 4:0 73 2004. –713, 340:705 , abig nvriyPes 2015. Press, University Cambridge . srnm,csooyadfnaetlphysics fundamental and cosmology Astronomy, abig nvriyPes 2003. Press, University Cambridge . 8 nentoa ora o hlspyo Religion of Philosophy for Journal International cec n liaeRaiy rmQatmto Quantum From Reality: Ultimate and Science Nature pigr 2015. Springer, . 0:1011,2001. 409:1110–1114, , xodUiest rs,1999. Press, University Oxford . 1:9–9,2011. 413:L91–L95, , nentoa Philosophical International 55:553–566, , NASA . Physica pages , ,