The Functional Roles of Passive Electroreception in Non-Electric Fishes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Functional Roles of Passive Electroreception in Non-Electric Fishes AnimalBiology ,Vol.54, No. 1, pp. 1-25 (2004) Ó KoninklijkeBrill NV ,Leiden,2004. Alsoavailable online - www.brill.nl Thefunctional rolesof passive electroreception innon-electric shes SHAUNP .COLLIN 1 andDARR YLWHITEHEAD 2; 1 Departmentof Anatomyand Developmental Biology, School of Biomedical Sciences 2 Centrefor Marine Studies, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Queensland, Australia Abstract—Passiveelectroreception is a complexand specialised sense found in a largerange of aquaticvertebrates primarily designed for the detection of weak bioelectric elds.Particular attention hastraditionally focused on cartilaginous shes,but a rangeof teleost and non-teleost shesfrom adiversityof habitats have also been examined. As more species are investigated, it has become apparentthat the role of electroreception in shesis not restricted to locatingprey, but is utilised in othercomplex behaviours. This paper presents the variousfunctional roles of passive electroreception innon-electric shes,by reviewing much of the recent research on the detection of prey in thecontext ofdifferencesin species’habitat (shallow water, deep-sea, freshwater and saltwater). A specialcase studyon the distribution and neural groupings of ampullary organs in the omnihaline bull shark, Carcharhinusleucas ,isalsopresented and reveals that prey-capture, rather than navigation, may be animportant determinant of pore distribution. The discrimination between potential predators and conspecics and the role of bioelectric stimuli in social behaviour is discussed, as is the ability tomigrate over short or long distances in order to locate environmentally favourable conditions. Thevarious theories proposed regarding the importance and mediation of geomagnetic orientation byeither an electroreceptive and/ ora magnetite-basedsensory system receives particular attention. Theimportance of electroreception to manyspecies is emphasisedby highlighting what still remains tobe investigated, especially with respect to the physical, biochemical and neural properties of the ampullaryorgans and the signals that give rise to the large range of observedbehaviours. Keywords:ampullaeof Lorenzini; electric elds;migration; orientation; passive electroreception; predation. 1.INTRODUCTION Electroreceptionis anancient sensorymodality ,havingevolved more than 500 million years ago,and has beenlost andsubsequently ‘ re-evolved’a numberof Correspondingauthor; e-mail: [email protected]. au 2 S.P.Collin& D.Whitehead Figure 1. Schematicdistribution of electroreceptionin groupsof living sheswith only some of the majorgroups shown. Example species of somegroups are noted. Groups possessing electroreception arenoted by a check( );non-electroreceptivegroups with a ( ).Modied from von der Emde, 1998. times in variousvertebrate classes (g. 1) (New, 1997; von der Emde, 1998; Alves-Gomez,2001). The multiple andindependent evolution of electroreception emphasises the importanceof this sense in avariety ofaquatic environments. Electroreceptive sensoryorgans can be broadly categorised intotwo distinct classes, ampullaryand tuberous, based primarily uponthe cellular morphologyof Functionalroles of electroreception 3 the receptororgans and secondarily on their respective frequencytuning character- istics (Szabo,1974; Zakon, 1986; New and Tricas, 1997).Ampullary receptors are broadlytuned to lowfrequency elds ( <0.1-25Hz), while tuberousreceptors are tunedto higherfrequency elds from50 Hz to over2 kHz(New, 1997). Thought to bea primitive vertebrate character,the ability to detect weakelectric elds in shes has thus far beenfound in agnathans(lampreys butnot hag shes, Bullocket al., 1983),chondrichthyans (sharks, skates, rays andchimeras, Bullocket al., 1983; Bodznickand Boord, 1986; Fields et al., 1993;New and Tricas, 1997),cladistians (bichirs, Jørgensen, 1982), chondrosteans (sturgeons and paddle sh, Teeter et al., 1980;Northcutt, 1986) and a small numberof species within the osteoglossomorph (knife shes, Braford,1982; Bullock and Northcutt, 1982; Carr andMaler, 1986; Zakon,1988) and three ordersof teleosts; mormyrids(African electric shes, Liss- mann,1958; Bell andSzabo, 1986), gymnotids (South American electric shes, Lissmann,1958; Carr andMaler, 1986;Zakon, 1988), and siluriform (catsh, Parker andvan Heusen, 1917; Roth, 1968; Finger, 1986; Whitehead et al., 1999,2003) groupsof shes (g. 1).Electroreception has also beenfound within the sister group ofthe actinopterygian shes, the Sarcopterygii,which comprises the dipnoanlung- shes (Northcutt,1986; Watt et al., 1999)and the actinistian coelacanth(Bemis and Hetherington,1982). Inmost ofthese groups,the ampullaryelectroreceptors are usedto detect animate andinanimate electric elds, bymeasuring minute changesin potential between the water at the skin surface andthe basal surface ofthe receptorcells. Inelasmo- branchs,ampullae ofLorenzini (Lorenzini, 1678) typically consist ofan elongated epithelial canal terminating in anumberof alveoli eachcontaining hundreds of re- ceptorcells andlocated belowthe surface ofthe epidermis, communicatingwith the surroundingwater via acanal (g. 2). The canal walls are formedby squamous epithelial cells joinedby tight junctions,which create ahighresistance (Waltman, 1966).The canals are lled with amucopolysaccharidejelly andmay radiate in all directions fromthe ampullaryclusters, providinga methodof directionally sam- plingthe electric eld surroundingthe animal (Kalmijn, 1974;Murray ,1974).In some marine elasmobranchs,up to 400ampullary tubes radiate froma single clus- ter (Chuand W en,1979). The clusters are restricted to the headin sharks,but are also distributed overthe pectoral ns in skates andrays. The typical ampullae in teleosts are similar butare characterised byshorter canals (e.g.50-200 ¹m in Plo- tosus tandanus and Ameiurusnebulosus ,in contrast to upto 20cm longin some species ofrays,Murray, 1974; Whitehead et al., 2003)and typically fewerreceptor cells perampulla (eight to 20in the catsh, Kryptopterus bicirrhus ,in contrast to hundredsper sensory organ in the elasmobranchs; Zakon,1986). In both groups, the structure ofelectroreceptors varies with habitat. Freshwater species haveshort canals andlow numbers of receptorcells (g. 2),in comparisonwith longcanals andnumerous receptor cells in marine species (Zakon,1986, 1988). One afferent bretypically innervates eachorgan or cluster oforgansin teleosts (see reviewin Zakon,1986, 1988) in contrast to the situation in elasmobranchs,where up to thou- 4 S.P.Collin& D.Whitehead Figure 2. Schematicdiagram of sensory organs utilised in electroreception in shes.A: Representa- tiveform of anampulla common to freshwater teleosts; B: Genericexample of an ampullaof Lorenzini froma freshwaterstingray; C, canal;E, epidermis;N, nerve;RC, receptorcells; SC, supportivecells. sands ofreceptor cells within asingle alveolus are contactedby upto 15afferent bres (Szabo,1974). Thearrangement of electroreceptors distributed overthe headof elasmobranchs are groupedinto discrete subdermalclusters innervatedprimarily bydifferent branchesof the anterior lateral line nerve(Norris, 1929; Northcutt, 1978). Epider- mal poresand the jelly-lled canals comprisingeach electroreceptive organensure that the potential within the ampullarylumen remains close to that at the skin sur- face.The hair cells ofeach receptor act as voltagedetectors andrelease neuro- transmitter ontothe primaryafferent neuronsaccording to the differencebetween the basal andapical potentials (Tricas, 2001).The primary afferent neuronsen- codestimulus amplitude andfrequency data that is sent to the brain(Montgomery, 1984;Tricas andNew, 1998), where a sophisticated set of lter mechanisms are usedfor extracting the weakelectrosensory signals froma muchstronger back- groundnoise, predominantly created bythe animal’s ownmovements (see review byBodznicket al., 2003).Therefore, the distribution ofthe ampullaryorgans may provideinformation about the electric eld’s intensity,its spatial conguration and possibly the direction ofits source(Tricas, 2001).However, only a fewworkers haveinterpreted the spatial arrangementof the electroreceptors in the contextof the natural ecologyof the animal (Rashi, 1986;Raschi andAdams, 1988; Fishelson and Baranes,1998; Kajiura, 2001; Raschi et al., 2001;Tricas, 2001). Althoughthe tuberouselectroreceptors foundin the mormyridand gymnotiform groupsof shes are usedin highfrequency electroreception, they are largely Functionalroles of electroreception 5 tunedto the dominantspectral frequenciesof the individual’s ownelectric organ discharges rather thanthe weakelectric elds producedby other organisms or environmentally-inducedelectric elds (see reviews byBullock, 1982; Bullock and Heiligenberg,1986; Turner et al., 1999).This reviewwill concentratesolely onthe roles ofpassive electroreception in non-electric shes and,for the sake ofbrevity, active electroreception andelectrocommunication will notbe examined. 2.LOCALISING PREY INDIFFERENT HABITATS Behaviouralstudies haverevealed that electroreception has evolvedto detect prey, wherelow frequency bioelectric elds emanatingfrom prey are detected using ampullaryorgans. These ampullae respondto DCorlow frequency electric elds, e.g.,1-8 Hz in elasmobranchs(Montgomery ,1984)and 6-12 Hz in silurid teleosts (Peters andBewalda, 1972). Elasmobranchs are able to respondphysiologically and behaviourallyto weak,low frequency electric elds of10 nV/ cm and5 nV/cm, respectively (Dijkgraafand Kalmijn, 1962,1966; Kalmijn, 1982).The behavioural relevanceof
Recommended publications
  • A New Stingray from South Africa
    Nature Vol. 289 22 January 1981 221 A new stingray from South Africa from Alwyne Wheeler ICHTHYOLOGISTS are accustomed to the regular description of previously un­ recognized species of fishes, which if not a daily event at least happens so frequently as not to cause great comment. Previously undescribed genera are like­ wise not infrequently published, but higher categories are increasingly less common. The discovery of a new stingray, which is so different from all known rays as to require both a new family and a new suborder to accommodate its distinctive characters, is therefore a remarkable event. A recent paper by P.e. Heemstra and M.M. Smith (Ichthyological Bulletin oj the J. L.B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology 43, I; 1980) describes this most striking ray as Hexatrygon bickelli and discusses its differences from other batoid fishes. Surprisingly, this remarkable fish was not the result of some organized deep-sea fishing programme, but was found lying on the beach at Port Elizabeth. It was fresh but had suffered some loss of skin by sand abrasion on the beach, and the margins of its fins appeared desiccated in places. The way it was discovered leaves a tantalising question as to its normal habitat, but Heemstra and Smith suggest that it may live in moderately deep water of 400-1,000m. This suggestion is Ventral view of Hexatrygon bickelli supported by its general appearance (small eyes, thin black dorsal skin, f1acid an acellular jelly, while the underside is chimaeroids Rhinochimaera and snout) and the chemistry of its liver-oil. richly supplied with well developed Harriota, and there can be little doubt The classification of Hexatrygon ampullae of Lorenzini.
    [Show full text]
  • AUV Adaptive Sampling Methods: a Review
    applied sciences Review AUV Adaptive Sampling Methods: A Review Jimin Hwang 1 , Neil Bose 2 and Shuangshuang Fan 3,* 1 Australian Maritime College, University of Tasmania, Launceston 7250, TAS, Australia; [email protected] 2 Department of Ocean and Naval Architectural Engineering, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1C 5S7, Canada; [email protected] 3 School of Marine Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519082, Guangdong, China * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 16 July 2019; Accepted: 29 July 2019; Published: 2 August 2019 Abstract: Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) are unmanned marine robots that have been used for a broad range of oceanographic missions. They are programmed to perform at various levels of autonomy, including autonomous behaviours and intelligent behaviours. Adaptive sampling is one class of intelligent behaviour that allows the vehicle to autonomously make decisions during a mission in response to environment changes and vehicle state changes. Having a closed-loop control architecture, an AUV can perceive the environment, interpret the data and take follow-up measures. Thus, the mission plan can be modified, sampling criteria can be adjusted, and target features can be traced. This paper presents an overview of existing adaptive sampling techniques. Included are adaptive mission uses and underlying methods for perception, interpretation and reaction to underwater phenomena in AUV operations. The potential for future research in adaptive missions is discussed. Keywords: autonomous underwater vehicle(s); maritime robotics; adaptive sampling; underwater feature tracking; in-situ sensors; sensor fusion 1. Introduction Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) are unmanned marine robots. Owing to their mobility and increased ability to accommodate sensors, they have been used for a broad range of oceanographic missions, such as surveying underwater plumes and other phenomena, collecting bathymetric data and tracking oceanographic dynamic features.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrosensory Pore Distribution and Feeding in the Basking Shark Cetorhinus Maximus (Lamniformes: Cetorhinidae)
    Vol. 12: 33–36, 2011 AQUATIC BIOLOGY Published online March 3 doi: 10.3354/ab00328 Aquat Biol NOTE Electrosensory pore distribution and feeding in the basking shark Cetorhinus maximus (Lamniformes: Cetorhinidae) Ryan M. Kempster*, Shaun P. Collin The UWA Oceans Institute and the School of Animal Biology, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia ABSTRACT: The basking shark Cetorhinus maximus is the second largest fish in the world, attaining lengths of up to 10 m. Very little is known of its sensory biology, particularly in relation to its feeding behaviour. We describe the abundance and distribution of ampullary pores over the head and pro- pose that both the spacing and orientation of electrosensory pores enables C. maximus to use passive electroreception to track the diel vertical migrations of zooplankton that enable the shark to meet the energetic costs of ram filter feeding. KEY WORDS: Ampullae of Lorenzini · Electroreception · Filter feeding · Basking shark Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher INTRODUCTION shark Rhincodon typus and the megamouth shark Megachasma pelagios, which can attain lengths of up Electroreception is an ancient sensory modality that to 14 and 6 m, respectively (Compagno 1984). These 3 has evolved independently across the animal kingdom filter-feeding sharks are among the largest living in multiple groups (Scheich et al. 1986, Collin & White- marine vertebrates (Compagno 1984) and yet they are head 2004). Repeated independent evolution of elec- all able to meet their energetic costs through the con- troreception emphasises the importance of this sense sumption of tiny zooplankton.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sensory World of Bees
    June 2015 in Australia ccThehh senseeory mmiissttrryy world of bees chemaust.raci.org.au ALSO IN THIS ISSUE: • One X-ray technique better than two • Haber’s rule and toxicity • Madeira wines worth the wait The tale in the Working and sensory lives DAVE SAMMUT g sBY tin of bees 18 | Chemistry in Australia June 2015 Bees have a well-earned reputation for pollination and honey-making, but their lesser known skills in electrocommunication are just as impressive. ccording to the United Nations, ‘of Once the worker bee’s honey stomach is the 100 crop species that provide full, it returns to the hive and regurgitates the 90 per cent of the world’s food, partially modified nectar for a hive bee. The A over 70 are pollinated by bees’ hive bee ingests this material to continue the (bit.ly/1DpiRYF). It’s little wonder, then, that conversion process, then again regurgitates it bees continue to be a subject of study around into a cell of the honeycomb. During these the world. More surprising, perhaps, is that so processes, the bees also absorb water, which much remains to be learned. dehydrates the mixture. Bee-keeping (apiculture) is believed to Hive bees then beat their wings to fan the have started as far back as about 4500 years regurgitated material. As the water evaporates ago; sculptures in ancient Egypt show workers (to as little as around 10% moisture), the blowing smoke into hives as they remove sugars thicken into honey – a supersaturated honeycomb. In ancient Greece, Aristotle either hygroscopic solution of carbohydrates (plus kept and studied bees in his own hives or oils, minerals and other impurities).
    [Show full text]
  • Waveform Sensors: the Next Challenge in Biomimetic Electroreception
    International Journal of Biosensors & Bioelectronics Mini Review Open Access Waveform sensors: the next challenge in biomimetic electroreception Abstract Volume 2 Issue 6 - 2017 The interest in developing bioinspired electric sensors increased after the rising use Alejo Rodríguez Cattaneo, Angel Caputi and of electric fields as image carriers in underwater robots and medical devices using artificial electroreception (electrotomography and electric catheterism). Electric Ana Carolina Pereira Dept Neurociencias Integrativas y Computacionales, Instituto images of objects have been most often conceived as the amplitude modulation of the de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Uruguay local electric field on a sensory mosaic, but recent research in electric fish indicates that the evaluation of time waveform of local stimulus can increase the electrosensory Correspondence: Ana Carolina Pereira, Department of channels capacities and therefore improve discrimination and recognition of target Neurociencias Integrativas y Computacionales, Instituto de objects. This minireview deals with the present importance of developing electric Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Av Italia 3318 sensors specifically tuned to the expected carrier waveforms to improve design of Montevideo, Uruguay, CP11600, Tel 59824871616, artificial bioinspired agents and diagnosis devices. Email [email protected] Keywords: Electroreception, Waveforms sensors Received: June 25, 2017 | Published: July 13, 2017 Introduction signal vanish when
    [Show full text]
  • Real-Time Monitoring for Toxicity Caused by Harmful Algal Blooms and Other Water Quality Perturbations EPA/600/R-01/103 November 2001
    United States Office of Research and EPA/600/R-01/103 Environmental Protection Development November 2001 Agency Washington, DC 20460 Real-Time Monitoring for Toxicity Caused By Harmful Algal Blooms and Other Water Quality Perturbations EPA/600/R-01/103 November 2001 Real-Time Monitoring for Toxicity Caused By Harmful Algal Blooms and Other Water Quality Perturbations National Center for Environmental Assessment-Washington Office Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC DISCLAIMER This document has been reviewed in accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency policy and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. ABSTRACT This project, sponsored by EPA’s Environmental Monitoring for Public Access and Community Tracking (EMPACT) program, evaluated the ability of an automated biological monitoring system that measures fish ventilatory responses (ventilatory rate, ventilatory depth, and cough rate) to detect developing toxic conditions in water. In laboratory tests, acutely toxic levels of both brevetoxin (PbTx-2) and toxic Pfiesteria piscicida cultures caused fish responses primarily through large increases in cough rate. In the field, the automated biomonitoring system operated continuously for 3 months on the Chicamacomico River, a tributary to the Chesapeake Bay that has had a history of intermittent toxic algal blooms. Data gathered through this effort complemented chemical monitoring data collected by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR) as part of their pfiesteria monitoring program. After evaluation by DNR personnel, the public could access the data at a DNR Internet website, (www.dnr.state.md.us/bay/pfiesteria/00results.html), or receive more detailed information at aquaticpath.umd.edu/empact.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroethlogy NROC34 Course Goals How? Evaluation
    Course Goals Neuroethlogy NROC34 • What is neuroethology? • Prof. A. Mason – Role of basic biology – Model systems (mainly invertebrate) • e-mail: – Highly specialized organisms – [email protected] – Biomimetics – [email protected] • Primary literature and the scientific process – No textbook – subject = NROC34 – But if you really want one, there are a couple of suggestion on the • Office Hours: Friday, 1 – 4:00 pm, SW566 syllabus • Basic principles of integrative neural function • Weekly Readings: download from course webpage – More on this a bit later www.utsc.utoronto.ca/amason/courses/coursepage/syllabus2012.html NROC34 2012:1 1 NROC34 2012:1 2 How? Evaluation • Case studies of several model systems – Different kinds of questions – Different kinds of research (techniques) • Weekly readings 5% – Sensory, motor, decision-making… • Mid-term 35-45% • Selected papers each week • Final Exam 45-60% – Read before, discuss during: usually readings are challenging and “discussion” means me explaining (so • Presentation (optional) 10% don’t be discouraged) • Most topics include current work • Weekly reading marks: each week several – Take you to the leading edge of research in selected people will be selected at random to areas contribute 3 questions about the papers. NROC34 2012:1 3 NROC34 2012:1 4 1 Information Neuroethology • Who are you people? • The study of the neural mechanisms • What do you expect to learn in this course? underlying behaviour that is biologically • What previous course have you taken in: relevant to the animal performing it. – neuroscience • This encompasses many basic mechanisms – Behaviour of the nervous system. • Is this a req’d course for you? • Combines behavioural analysis and neurophysiology NROC34 2012:1 5 NROC34 2012:1 6 Neurobiology Behavioural Science • What do I mean by “integrative neural function”? • What does the nervous system do? • Ethology • Psychology – detect information in the environment – biological behaviour – abstract concepts (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Resisting Flow – Laboratory Study of Rheotaxis of the Estuarine Copepod Pseudodiaptomus Annandalei Xu Shanga,B, Guizhong Wanga* and Shaojing Lia
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Xiamen University Institutional Repository Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology Vol. 41, No. 2, June 2008, 109–124 Resisting flow – laboratory study of rheotaxis of the estuarine copepod Pseudodiaptomus annandalei Xu Shanga,b, Guizhong Wanga* and Shaojing Lia aDepartment of Oceanography, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, PR China; bSchool of Environmental and Public Health, Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou, PR China (Received 1 May 2007; final version received 7 January 2008) Rheotaxis is a ubiquitous phenomenon among aquatic animals and thought to be an adaptation to maintain populations in flowing waters. While many estuarine copepods can retain their populations in estuaries with net seaward flow, rheotaxis of individual copepods has not been reported before. In this study, the behavior of a calanoid copepod Pseudodiaptomus annandalei in flow was examined in a recirculating laboratory flume. This estuarine copepod displayed different responses to ambient flow fields while swimming in the water column or attaching to the flume bed (walls). Copepods in the water column showed vigorous countercurrent swimming by occasional bounding when flow velocity was increased up to 2.1 cm sÀ1, but none of the individuals in the water column were retained in the flume when flow speeds were higher than 4 cm sÀ1. This indicates P. annandalei profits little from rheotaxis to withstand flow when they were swimming in the water column. Instead, more individuals attempted sinking downwards to the slow flow region near the flume bed (walls) and showed active substrate attachment to avoid being flushed out by the high-velocity channel flow.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals
    Jelle Atema Richard R. Fay Arthur N. Popper William N. Tavolga Editors Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals Springer-Verlag New York Berlin Heidelberg London Paris Tokyo JELLE ATEMA, Boston University Marine Program, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA Richard R. Fay, Parmly Hearing Institute, Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois 60626, USA ARTHUR N. POPPER, Department of Zoology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA WILLIAM N. TAVOLGA, Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, Florida 33577, USA The cover Illustration is a reproduction of Figure 13.3, p. 343 of this volume Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Sensory biology of aquatic animals. Papers based on presentations given at an International Conference on the Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals held, June 24-28, 1985, at the Mote Marine Laboratory in Sarasota, Fla. Bibliography: p. Includes indexes. 1. Aquatic animals—Physiology—Congresses. 2. Senses and Sensation—Congresses. I. Atema, Jelle. II. International Conference on the Sensory Biology - . of Aquatic Animals (1985 : Sarasota, Fla.) QL120.S46 1987 591.92 87-9632 © 1988 by Springer-Verlag New York Inc. x —• All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer-Verlag, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York 10010, U.S.A.), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of Information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, Computer Software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontogeny of Orientation During the Early Life History of the Pelagic Teleost Mahi-Mahi, Coryphaena Hippurus Linnaeus, 1758
    Article Ontogeny of Orientation during the Early Life History of the Pelagic Teleost Mahi-Mahi, Coryphaena hippurus Linnaeus, 1758 Robin Faillettaz 1,2,* , Eve Johnson 1, Patrick Dahlmann 1, Alexandra Syunkova 1, John Stieglitz 3, Daniel Benetti 3, Martin Grosell 1 and Claire B. Paris 1,* 1 Department of Marine Biology and Ecology, University of Miami, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, FL 33149, USA; [email protected] (E.J.); [email protected] (P.D.); [email protected] (A.S.); [email protected] (M.G.) 2 Ifremer, STH, Station de Lorient, 8 rue François Toullec, F-56100 Lorient, France 3 Department of Marine Ecosystems and Society, University of Miami, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, FL 33149, USA; [email protected] (J.S.); [email protected] (D.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (R.F.); [email protected] (C.B.P.) Received: 6 July 2020; Accepted: 29 September 2020; Published: 8 October 2020 Abstract: Understanding the orientation behavior and capabilities in early life history (ELH) of fishes is critical for studying their dispersal but has, surprisingly, never been tested in any pelagic species. We here investigate the ontogeny of orientation and swimming abilities of the pelagic Coryphaena hippurus Linnaeus, 1758 larvae, hereafter mahi-mahi, through their ELH stages using the Drifting In Situ Chamber (DISC) in a laboratory setup. The DISC was deployed in a large (3 m3) circular aquarium in order to control the stimulus perceived by the fish and to identify behavioral response at the individual, developmental stage, and population levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Color and Learn: Sharks of Massachusetts!
    COLOR AND LEARN: SHARKS OF MASSACHUSETTS! This book belongs to: WHAT IS A SHARK? Sharks are fish that have vertebrae (skeletons) made ofcartilage instead of bones. Sharks come in all different shapes, sizes, and colors. Sharks have different kinds of teeth, feeding patterns, swimming styles, and behaviors that help them to survive in all different kinds of aquatic habitats! Can you label the different parts of a shark? second dorsal fin caudal (tail) fin pelvic fin gills anal fin pectoral fin nostril mouth eye Dorsal fin There are around 500 species of sharks in the world. Massachusetts coastal waters provide ideal habitat for several kinds of Atlantic Ocean sharks that visit our waters each season! Massachusetts HOW LONG HAVE SHARKS BEEN ON EARTH? Sharks have been on Earth since before the dinosaurs! Scientists learn about early sharks by studying fossils. Shark fossils can tell us a lot about what food the shark ate, what their habitat looked like, and how they are related to other sharks. The ancient sharks on this page are extinct. Acanthodes (ah-can-tho-deez), or “spiny shark,” was the first fish to have a cartilage skeleton! Cladoselache (clay-do-sel-ah-kee) had a body and tail shaped for swimming fast. It did not have the same kind of skin that we see in modern sharks today. Stethacanthus (stef-ah-can-thus), or “anvil shark”, had a dorsal fin shaped like an ironing board! 450 370 360 200 145 60 6.5 MILLIONS OF YEARS AGO DINOSAURS EVOLVE WHAT ARE “MODERN” SHARKS? “Modern” sharks are species that have body parts (both inside and out!) that can be found on sharks living today.
    [Show full text]
  • Rheotaxis of Guppies Above Waterfalls
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Asymmetric Isolation and the Evolution of Behaviors Influencing Dispersal: Rheotaxis of Guppies above Waterfalls Léa Blondel 1,* , Sandra Klemet-N’Guessan 2, Marilyn E. Scott 3 and Andrew P. Hendry 1 1 Redpath Museum and Department of Biology, McGill University, 859 Sherbrooke St. W., Montréal, QC H3A 0C4, Canada; [email protected] 2 Department of Biology, Trent University, 2140 East Bank Drive, Peterborough, ON K9L 1Z8, Canada; [email protected] 3 Institute of Parasitology, McGill University (Macdonald Campus), 21,111 Lakeshore Drive, Ste. Anne-de-Bellevue, QC H9X 3V9, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 15 January 2020; Accepted: 5 February 2020; Published: 9 February 2020 Abstract: Populations that are asymmetrically isolated, such as above waterfalls, can sometimes export emigrants in a direction from which they do not receive immigrants, and thus provide an excellent opportunity to study the evolution of dispersal traits. We investigated the rheotaxis of guppies above barrier waterfalls in the Aripo and Turure rivers in Trinidad—the later having been introduced in 1957 from a below-waterfall population in another drainage. We predicted that, as a result of strong selection against downstream emigration, both of these above-waterfall populations should show strong positive rheotaxis. Matching these expectations, both populations expressed high levels of positive rheotaxis, possibly reflecting contemporary (rapid) evolution in the introduced Turure population. However, the two populations used different behaviors to achieve the same performance of strong positive rheotaxis, as has been predicted in the case of multiple potential evolutionary solutions to the same functional challenge (i.e., “many-to-one mapping”).
    [Show full text]