DOCSLIB.ORG

Ramshaw, Adam (2016) the Role of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights in Public and Private Sector Possession Proceedings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ramshaw, Adam (2016) the Role of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights in Public and Private Sector Possession Proceedings Citation: Ramshaw, Adam (2016) The role of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights in public and private sector possession proceedings. Doctoral thesis, Northumbria University. This version was downloaded from Northumbria Research Link: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/36013/ Northumbria University has developed Northumbria Research Link (NRL) to enable users to access the University’s research output. Copyright © and moral rights for items on NRL are retained by the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. Single copies of full items can be reproduced, displayed or performed, and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided the authors, title and full bibliographic details are given, as well as a hyperlink and/or URL to the original metadata page. The content must not be changed in any way. Full items must not be sold commercially in any format or medium without formal permission of the copyright holder. The full policy is available online: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/policies.html THE ROLE OF ARTICLE 8 OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR POSSESSION PROCEEDINGS A J Ramshaw PhD 2016 THE ROLE OF ARTICLE 8 OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR POSSESSION PROCEEDINGS ADAM JOHN RAMSHAW A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Northumbria at Newcastle for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Research undertaken in the Faculty of Business and Law September 2016 Abstract This thesis is concerned with the legal shortcomings flowing from Manchester City Council v Pinnock.1 Following Pinnock tenants of local authorities may have the proportionality of a possession order considered by the court in light of art.8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Human Rights Act 1998. However, there are questions outstanding from Pinnock. Firstly, there has been a failure within the courts to appreciate the importance of the home to the individual, their family, and society in general. Secondly, domestic courts have not provided adequate reasons for limiting art.8 to proceedings involving a local authority. Thirdly, the nature of proportionality within possession proceedings has been poorly conceived thereby marginalising art.8’s effects. This thesis draws support from philosophical and sociological literature to illustrate the deep connection a person feels towards their home. These connections exist irrespective of ownership yet it is these non-legal interests which are often overlooked by the courts. It is argued here that art.8 may protect these non-legal interests. Further, this thesis questions why art.8’s protection ought to be limited to proceedings involving a public sector landlord. The thesis provides an overview of the competing theories concerning horizontal effect and their related shortcomings. The work of Alexy is used to argue that horizontal effect is a singular phenomenon thereby making art.8 applicable in private proceedings. The public/private divide is then critiqued to demonstrate the theoretical viability of horizontal effect where a person’s home is at risk. The final strand of this thesis is concerned with how the competing interests of landlords and tenants may be adjudged. To this end a structured proportionality model is developed to replace the general proportionality exercise utilised by the courts following Pinnock. This proportionality model is then applied to existing case law to demonstrate its viability and context sensitivity. 1 Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45, [2011] 2 AC 104. Table of Contents Table of Cases .............................................................................................................. vi Table of Legislation .................................................................................................. xvii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................. xviii Declaration ................................................................................................................ xix 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 The Need for Increased Security of Tenure in Rented Accommodation ...... 1 1.2 The Objectives and Structure of this Thesis .................................................. 8 1.3 Methodology ................................................................................................. 11 2 The Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the English Court in Relation to Article 8 ..................................................................................... 15 2.1 Housing Law and Human Rights ................................................................ 17 2.2 The Shortcomings of Article 8 Jurisprudence ............................................20 2.2.1 What is the Underlying Importance of the Home as Conceived by Article 8(1) and How Should this Inform Article 8’s Application? ....................20 2.2.2 What is the Theoretical and Legal Basis for Arbitrarily Limiting Article 8’s Application to Local Authority Tenants? ...................................................... 25 2.2.3 What is Required by Proportionality in Possession Proceedings? ...... 32 2.3 Conclusions on Article 8 Jurisprudence ..................................................... 37 3 The Underlying Importance of the Home as Independent From Private Property ...................................................................................................................... 39 3.1 The Nature of Private Property ................................................................... 39 3.1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 39 3.1.2 What is Property? ................................................................................ 40 3.1.3 Justifications for Property and Ownership .......................................... 41 3.1.4 The Rights Attached to Property .......................................................... 53 ii 3.2 The Inherent Non-Legal Importance of the Home to the Individual and Society .................................................................................................................... 58 3.2.1 Introduction ......................................................................................... 58 3.2.2 More than Simply Ownership .............................................................. 59 3.2.3 The X Factors of the Home .................................................................. 70 3.3 Conclusions ................................................................................................ 80 4 The Argument for Horizontal Effect of Article 8 ................................................ 83 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 83 4.2 Defining Horizontal Effect .......................................................................... 85 4.3 Forms of Horizontal Effect .......................................................................... 85 4.3.1 Direct Horizontal Effect ....................................................................... 85 4.3.2 Horizontal Applicability .......................................................................86 4.3.3 Beyleveld and Pattinson’s Substantive Argument for Full Horizontal Effect ………………………………………………………………………………………………….87 4.3.4 Section 3(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998 ........................................ 88 4.3.5 Full Horizontal Effect .......................................................................... 90 4.3.6 Remedial Horizontality ........................................................................ 93 4.3.7 Indirect Horizontal Effect .................................................................... 95 4.4 Missing the Point? ..................................................................................... 101 4.4.1 The Level of State Duties ................................................................... 102 4.4.2 The Level of Rights Against the State ................................................ 103 4.4.3 The Level of Legal Relations Between Private Individuals ................ 104 4.5 Further Support for Horizontal Effect ...................................................... 105 4.6 Article 14 Jurisprudence ........................................................................... 106 4.6.1 The Ambit of Article 14 ...................................................................... 108 iii 4.6.2 The Statuses of Article 14 ................................................................... 109 4.6.3 Justifications for Interference with Article 14 .................................... 113 4.7 Conclusion .................................................................................................. 119 5 The Public/Private Divide and its Effects in the Application of Article 8 to Housing Law ............................................................................................................. 121 5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 121 5.2 Emergence of the Public/Private Divide ................................................... 123 5.2.1 Historical Roots ................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Crime AACCMP.Book
    Crime and Courts Bill [HL] [AS AMENDED IN PUBLIC BILL COMMITTEE] The Bill is divided into two volumes. Volume I contains the Clauses. Volume II contains the Schedules to the Bill. Bill 137 55/2 ii Crime and Courts Bill [HL] CONTENTS PART 1 THE NATIONAL CRIME AGENCY The NCA and its officers 1 The National Crime Agency 2 Strategic priorities 3 Operations Other functions etc. 4 Relationships between NCA and other agencies: tasking etc 5 Duty to publish information 6 Information gateways 7 Other functions etc 8 Director General: customs powers of Commissioners & operational powers 9 Operational powers of other NCA officers General 10 Inspections and complaints 11 Information: restrictions on disclosure etc 12 NCA officers with operational powers: labour relations 13 NCA officers with operational powers: pay and allowances 14 Abolition of SOCA and NPIA 15 Interpretation of Part 1 PART 2 COURTS AND JUSTICE Administration of justice 16 Civil and family proceedings in England and Wales 17 Youth courts to have jurisdiction to grant gang-related injunctions 18 Judicial appointments 19 Deployment of the judiciary 20 Transfer of immigration or nationality judicial review applications 21 Permission to appeal from Upper Tribunal to Court of Session 22 Appeals relating to regulation of the Bar 23 Enforcement by taking control of goods 24 Payment of fines and other sums 25 Disclosure of information to facilitate collection of fines and other sums 26 Disclosure of information for calculating fees of courts, tribunals etc 27 Enforcement services 28 Supreme
    [Show full text]
  • Interpreting the European Convention on Human Rights in the United Kingdom Courts: the Impact for Religious Organisations
    Interpreting the European Convention on Human Rights in the United Kingdom Courts: The Impact for Religious Organisations PROFESSOR MARK HILL Centre for Law and Religion, Cardiff University1 EUROPEAN CONSORTIUM FOR CHURCH AND STATE RESEARCH Cyprus, November 2007 Introduction The traditional approach of English law The impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 Statutory interpretation Regulation of public authorities The horizontal effect of the Act The decisions of the House of Lords A Shakespearean church The chastisement of children The Muslim veil in schools General trends in the lower courts Religious dress Sacred symbols Religious discrimination Sexual orientation discrimination Differential treatment in the right to marry Conclusions INTRODUCTION When considering, in a comparative context, the manner in which an international instrument such as the European Convention on Human Rights is implemented in domestic courts of individual states, an understanding of the particular constitutional conditions is first necessary. The United Kingdom has no written constitution, nor does it have a bill of rights or charter of fundamental freedoms. It is a liberal democracy in which Parliament is sovereign. It does not have a constitutional court in which legislation is scrutinised for its compliance or otherwise with any free-standing constitutional precepts or principles. Put simply, Parliament makes the law and the judges apply it. However, a significant shift has taken place following Tony Blair’s Labour government coming into power in 1997. This can best be appreciated following a description of the traditional approach of English law. THE TRADITIONAL APPROACH OF ENGLISH LAW The legal approach to religion and religious liberty has differed over time and across societies.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission and Pastoral Measure 2011 Code of Recommended Practice – Volume 2 – Dealing with Consecrated Church Buildings
    Mission and Pastoral Measure 2011 Code of Recommended Practice – Volume 2 – Dealing with Consecrated Church Buildings Mission and Pastoral Measure 2011 Code of Recommended Practice Volume 2: Dealing with Consecrated Church Buildings 1st Edition – July 2012 Mission and Pastoral Measure 2011 Code of Recommended Practice – Volume 2 – Dealing with Consecrated Church Buildings Mission and Pastoral Measure 2011 Code of Recommended Practice – Dealing with Consecrated Church Buildings From time to time amendments and supplements will be notified by email. In order to receive notification you are invited to email your request to [email protected]. The Code can also be downloaded from the Church Commissioners’ website (http://www.ccpastoral.org/mpm2011code). Mission and Pastoral Measure 2011 Code of Recommended Practice – Volume 2 – Dealing with Consecrated Church Buildings Contents List of Common Acronyms Chapter 12 - Introduction 12.1 – 12.7 Introduction 12.8 Background to the Code 12.9 What the Code sets out to do 12.10 - 12.12 Presentation 12.13 Updating the Code 12.14 - 12.21 Key statutory bodies 12.22 - 12.24 General duty Chapter 13 - The role of the Diocesan Mission and Pastoral Committee 13.1 - 13.2 Appointment and membership 13.3 - 13.6 Annual and interim reports 13.7 - 3.8 Considerations, functions and duties 13.9 - 13.11 Ascertainment of views of interested parties: statutory requirements 13.12 - 13.15 Ascertainment of views: arrangements in practice 13.16 - 13.19 Submission of proposals to the Commissioners 13.20 - 13.21 Draft
    [Show full text]
  • Opinions of the Lords of Appeal for Judgment in The
    HOUSE OF LORDS SESSION 2002-03 [2003] UKHL 37 on appeal from:[2001] EWCA Civ 713 OPINIONS OF THE LORDS OF APPEAL FOR JUDGMENT IN THE CAUSE Parochial Church Council of the Parish of Aston Cantlow and Wilmcote with Billesley, Warwickshire (Appellants) v. Wallbank and another (Respondents) ON THURSDAY 26 JUNE 2003 The Appellate Committee comprised: Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead Lord Hope of Craighead Lord Hobhouse of Woodborough Lord Scott of Foscote Lord Rodger of Earlsferry LORD NICHOLLS OF BIRKENHEAD My Lords, 1. I have had the advantage of reading in draft the speeches of all your Lordships. I too would allow this appeal. On some of the issues your Lordships have expressed different views. I shall state my own views without repeating the facts. 2. This case concerns one of the more arcane and unsatisfactory areas of property law: the liability of a lay rector, or lay impropriator, for the repair of the chancel of a church. The very language is redolent of a society long disappeared. The anachronistic, even capricious, nature of this ancient liability was recognised some years ago by the Law Commission: Property Law: Liability for Chancel Repairs (1985) Law Com No 152. The commission said 'this relic of the past' is 'no longer acceptable'. The commission recommended its phased abolition. 3. In these proceedings Mr and Mrs Wallbank admitted that, apart from the Human Rights Act 1998, they have no defence to the claim made against them by the Parochial Church Council of the parish of Aston Cantlow and Wilmcote with Billesley, Warwickshire. The House was not asked to consider whether the case of Wickhambrook Parochial Church Council v Croxford [1935] 2 KB 417 was correctly decided.
    [Show full text]
  • Btcaak P.A. Diaper, Law and Religion in England Between 1532-1994
    Paul Antony Diaper, Law and Religion in England between 1532-1994 PONTIFICIA UNIVERSITAS SANCTAE CRUCIS FACULTAS IURIS CANONICI Paul Antony Diaper LAW AND RELIGION IN ENGLAND BETWEEN 1532-1994 the legal development of the Established Church, Religious Toleration and Conscientious Objection. Thesis ad Doctoratum in Iure Canonico totaliter edita Romae 2000 Coram Commissione docentium, 22 novembris 1999, doctoralem dissertationem Candidatus palam defendit. btcaak pag.1/447 Paul Antony Diaper, Law and Religion in England between 1532-1994 II Ad normam Statutorum Pontificiae Universitatis Sanctae Crucis hanc dissertationem perlegimus ac typis totaliter edendam adprovabimus: Prof. Dr. Ioseph Thomas Martín de Agar Prof. Dr. Vincentius Prieto IMPRIMI POTEST Prof. Dr. Eduardus Baura, Decanus Facultatis Iuris Canonici Romae, 28 februarii 2000 Secretarius Generalis Dr. Alfonsus Monroy Prot. nº 123/2000 Imprimatur: Mons. Cesare Nosiglia, Vices Gerens, Vicariatus Urbis Romae, die 14 mense martii anno 2000 btcaak pag.2/447 Paul Antony Diaper, Law and Religion in England between 1532-1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction....................................................... XIII Acknowledgements ............................................. XIX Works used often throughout the text: ............XXIII Chapter 1 The Position of the English Church prior to 1532: the relationship between its canon law and English law; Principles of Modern English law. 1.1 Introduction. .......................................................4 1.2. The Catholic Church in England prior to 1066. .........6 1.2.1 The arrival of Christianity in Britannia. 8 1.2.2. The separation of the Church in Britannia from the rest of the Church. 10 1.2.3. The arrival of St Augustine in 547 and the ecclesial government given to the English Church by Pope Gregory the Great.
    [Show full text]
  • Aston Cantlow and Wilmcote with Billesley Parochial Church Council V Wallbank and Another
    546 Aston Cantlow PCC v Wallbank (HL(E))[2004] 1 AC House of Lords A Aston Cantlow and Wilmcote with Billesley Parochial Church Council v Wallbank and another [2003] UKHL 37 2003 March 3, 4, 5; Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead, Lord Hope of Craighead, B June 26 Lord Hobhouse of Woodborough, Lord Scott of Foscote and Lord Rodger of Earlsferry Ecclesiastical law Ñ Lay rector Ñ Repairs to chancel Ñ Obligation at common law to repair chancel Ñ Parochial church councilÕs statutory power to recover cost of repairs from lay rector Ñ Whether infringing lay rectorÕs Convention right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions Ñ Whether unlawful discrimination in C enjoyment of Convention right Ñ Whether parochial church council ÔÔpublic authorityÕÕ Ñ Whether entitled to enforce liability against lay rector Ñ Chancel Repairs Act 1932 (22 Geo 5,c20), ss 1, 2 Ñ Human Rights Act 1998 (c 42), s 6, Sch 1, Pt I, art 14, Pt II, art 1 The defendants were the freehold owners of former rectorial land and consequently, as lay rectors or lay impropriators, they were liable at common law to D repair the chancel of their parish church. In September 1994 the plainti­, the parochial church council, served the Þrst defendant with a notice under section 2(1) of the Chancel Repairs Act 19321 calling upon her to repair the chancel. She disputed the liability, and the plainti­ subsequently brought proceedings against the defendants, pursuant to section 2(2) of the 1932 Act, to recover the cost of chancel repairs. On a preliminary issue the judge held that the defendants were liable for the cost of the repairs.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Lords Official Report
    Vol. 758 Thursday No. 85 15 January 2015 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) HOUSE OF LORDS OFFICIAL REPORT ORDER OF BUSINESS Questions HIV..................................................................................................................................................891 Personal Independence Payments ..................................................................................................893 United States: Haggis Ban............................................................................................................896 Milk Production..............................................................................................................................897 Business of the House Timing of Debates..........................................................................................................................900 Natural Environment Motion to Take Note.....................................................................................................................901 NHS: Accident and Emergency Services Question for Short Debate.............................................................................................................934 Mental Health Motion to Take Note.....................................................................................................................948 Insurance Bill [HL] Third Reading..................................................................................................................................980 Developing World: Maternal and Neonatal
    [Show full text]
  • England and Wales by Professor Peter Sparkes, Professor of Property Law, Uni- Versity of Southampton, Subject Sections Secretary of the Society of Legal Scholars
    Real Property Law and Procedure in the European Union Annotated Draft Questionnaire Report from England and Wales by Professor Peter Sparkes, Professor of Property Law, Uni- versity of Southampton, Subject Sections Secretary of the Society of Legal Scholars. 1. Real Property Law – Introduction 1.1 General Features and Short History When were the main rules of your national real property law introduced? What have been the main reforms up to the present date? What are the relevant sources of the law as it stands now (civil code, special statutes, case law)? Terminology “Real property” is commonly used as a translation for the civilian concept of immoveable property, and this is the term that has become entrenched in the USA for example, but in England modern property lawyers generally consider that the correct concept is “land”. “Real property” has a technical meaning derived from the old law of succession, which became obsolete in England (as opposed to Ireland) in 1925. Real property included free- hold land but excluded leasehold land so that the two forms of ownership were formerly treated differently on death but, since 1925, all property (moveable and immoveable) has been subject to a single assimilated law of succession. It is almost never correct to analy- se modern law in terms of real and personal property, so “land” is the closest concept to immoveable property. The United Kingdom The United Kingdom has a wide diversity of property laws. When this report refers to “English” law it means the law in force in England and Wales, the land law in force in Wales being more or less identical to that in England – apart from the possibility of using the Welsh language for forms and documents – since the competence of the Welsh As- sembly has not been exercised except in peripheral areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime and Courts Bill [HL]
    Crime and Courts Bill [HL] [AS AMENDED IN COMMITTEE] CONTENTS PART 1 THE NATIONAL CRIME AGENCY The NCA and its officers 1 The National Crime Agency 2 Modification of NCA functions 3 Strategic priorities 4 Operations Other functions etc. 5 Relationships between NCA and other agencies: tasking etc 6 Duty to publish information 7 Information gateways 8 Other functions etc 9 Director General: customs powers of Commissioners & operational powers 10 Operational powers of other NCA officers General 11 Inspections and complaints 12 Information: restrictions on disclosure etc 13 NCA officers with operational powers: labour relations 14 NCA officers with operational powers: pay and allowances 15 Abolition of SOCA and NPIA 16 Interpretation of Part 1 PART 2 COURTS AND JUSTICE Administration of justice 17 Civil and family proceedings in England and Wales 18 Judicial appointments 19 Deployment of the judiciary HL Bill 49 55/2 ii Crime and Courts Bill [HL] 20 Transfer of immigration or nationality judicial review applications 21 Payment of fines and other sums 22 Disclosure of information for calculating fees of courts, tribunals etc 23 Enabling the making, and use, of films and other recordings of proceedings Community and other non-custodial sentencing 24 Dealing non-custodially with offenders Deferred prosecution agreements 25 Deferred prosecution agreements PART 3 MISCELLANEOUS AND GENERAL Border control 26 Appeals against refusal of entry clearance to visit the UK 27 Restriction on right of appeal from within the United Kingdom 28 Powers of immigration
    [Show full text]
  • The County Court Rules 1981
    The County Court Rules 1981 1981 No. 1687 (L.20) Made 16th November 1981 Coming into Operation 1st September 1982 ORDER 1CITATION, APPLICATION AND INTERPRETATION Citation 1. These rules may be cited as the County Court Rules 1981. Application of rules 2.—(1) Subject to paragraph (2), these rules shall apply to all proceedings authorised by or under any existing or future Act to be commenced or taken in a county court. (2) In relation to proceedings of a particular kind in a county court, these rules shall have effect subject to any rules made by an authority other than the rule committee mentioned in section 102 of the Act which apply to proceedings of that kind. Definitions 3. In these rules, unless the context otherwise requires– “the Act” means the County Courts Act 1959; “address for service” means the address of a place at or to which any document may be delivered or sent for the party giving the address, being— (a) in the case of a party in person, his place of residence or business or, if he has no such place within England or Wales, the address of a place within England or Wales at or to which documents for him may be delivered or sent, (b) where the party is represented by a solicitor, the business address of the solicitor; “defendant” includes respondent; “filed” has the meaning assigned to it by Order 2, rule 4; “foreign court” means the court to which process is sent by another court; “hire-purchase agreement” has the same meaning as in the Hire-Purchase Act 1965; “home court” means the court from which process is originally
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Land Law and Human Rights
    1 LAND LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS Kevin Gray [ in Louise Tee (ed), Land Law: Issues, Debates, Policy (Willan Publishing 2002), 211 – 245 ] A. Introduction Land law and human rights have never seemed particularly natural bedfellows. Perhaps it is because the popular notions of property and humanity appear somehow antithetical, a jarring juxtaposition of the self- regarding impulse towards personal appropriation and an other-regarding vision of the intrinsic merits of strangers. Again, land law and human rights law may have tended to look like polar extremes of jurisprudential concern precisely because, across the distance of the supposed public-private divide, the rather different resonances of their unshared terminology -- the intellectual tenor of divergent legal traditions -- intensified the impression that these areas were culturally and substantively quite distinct. Their lack of congruence may have appeared all the more understandable in those jurisdictions where the allocation of the primary goods of life was already largely settled and where disputes over land seldom raised fundamental issues of raw human entitlement. On this view human rights considerations were apt to penetrate the sphere of the land lawyer only in the context of aboriginal land claims or systematic ethnic displacement or gross colonial exploitation in far-flung parts of the globe. In England, by contrast, the interface between human rights discourse and the law of real property came to seem somewhat limited amidst the relative affluence of a post- war welfare state in which the oppressed and the dispossessed -- Frantz Fanon's 'wretched of the earth' -- were conspicuous mainly by their absence. For these, and many other, reasons the intricate machinery of the Law of Property Act 1925 and its satellite legislation contains little which could be confused with the positive protection or reinforcement of basic concepts of human freedom, dignity and equality.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission and Pastoral Measure 2011 Code of Recommended Practice – Volume 1 – Pastoral Reorganisation
    Mission and Pastoral Measure 2011 Code of Recommended Practice – Volume 1 – Pastoral Reorganisation Mission and Pastoral Measure 2011 Code of Recommended Practice Volume 1: Pastoral Reorganisation st 1 Edition – July 2012 Mission and Pastoral Measure 2011 Code of Recommended Practice – Volume 1 – Pastoral Reorganisation Mission and Pastoral Measure 2011 Code of Recommended Practice – Volume 1: Pastoral Reorganisation From time to time amendments and supplements will be notified by email. In order to receive notification you are invited to email your request to [email protected]. The Code can also be downloaded from the Church Commissioners’ website (http://www.ccpastoral.org/mpm2011code). Mission and Pastoral Measure 2011 Code of Recommended Practice – Volume 1 – Pastoral Reorganisation Contents List of Common Acronyms Chapter 1 - Introduction 1 - 1.8 Introduction 1.9 Background to the Code 1.10 What the Code sets out to do 1.11 - 1.13 Presentation 1.14 Updating the Code 1.15 - 1.22 Key statutory bodies under the 2011 Measure 1.23 - 1.25 General duty Chapter 2 - The role of the Diocesan Mission and Pastoral Committee 2.1 - 2-2 Appointment and constitution 2.3 – 2.5 Membership of the committee and any sub-committees 2.6 – 2.8 Personal interests of members of the committee 2.9 Committee’s annual report 2.10 – 2.13 Liaison with other diocesan boards and committees 2.14 – 2.15 Considerations, functions and duties 2.16 – 2.19 Application of the consideration in s.3 of the Measure 2.20 Application of diocesan policy 2.21 Closure of
    [Show full text]