DOCSLIB.ORG

Allergan Pharmaceuticals Ireland Biologics Capacity Expansion Project Environmental Impact Statement (Volume 2)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Allergan Pharmaceuticals Ireland Biologics Capacity Expansion Project Environmental Impact Statement (Volume 2) Allergan Pharmaceuticals Ireland Biologics Capacity Expansion Project Environmental Impact Statement (Volume 2) For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. July 2012 EPA Export 16-12-2013:23:16:13 Environmental Impact Statement Allergan Pharmaceuticals Ireland Biologics Capacity Expansion Project DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Client Allergan Pharmaceuticals Ireland Project Title Biologics Capacity Expansion Project For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. Document Title Environmental Impact Statement (Volume 2) Document No. MDE1096Rp0001B List of No. of DCS TOC Text List of Tables This Document Figures Appendices Comprises 1 1 233 1 1 - Rev. Status Author(s) Reviewed By Approved By Office of Origin Issue Date F01 Final Various E. Oliviera P. Chadwick West Pier 31 July 2012 EPA Export 16-12-2013:23:16:13 Allergan Pharmaceuticals Ireland Biologics Capacity Expansion Project Environmental Impact Statement PREFACE The structure of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed Allergan Biologics Capacity Expansion Project is laid out in the preface of each volume for clarity. The EIS consists of three volumes as follows: Volume 1 – Non-Technical Summary A non-technical summary of information contained in Volume 2. Volume 2 – Environmental Impact Statement This is the main volume of the EIS. It provides information on the location and scale of the proposed development, details on design and impacts on the environment (both positive and negative) as a result of the proposed development. Volume 3 – Technical Appendices Specialist technical reports on which information in Volume 2 is based. For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. MDE1096Rp0001B i Rev F01 EPA Export 16-12-2013:23:16:14 Allergan Pharmaceuticals Ireland Biologics Capacity Expansion Project Environmental Impact Statement ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This EIS has been prepared by RPS Group and their specialist environmental sub-consultants. Project Team Planning RPS Group Traffic RPS Group Human Beings RPS Group Air Quality and Climate RPS Group Noise RPS Group Landscape and Visual Impact RPS Group Terrestrial Ecology RPS Group Aquatic Ecology RPS Group Drainage RPS Group Soils Geology and Hydrogeology RPS Group Property RPS Group Material Assets RPS Group Archaeology, Architecture and Cultural Heritage Courtney Deery Heritage Consultancy For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. MDE1096Rp0001B ii Rev F01 EPA Export 16-12-2013:23:16:14 Allergan Pharmaceuticals Ireland Biologics Capacity Expansion Project Environmental Impact Statement TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE................................................................................................................................................. I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS....................................................................................................................... II 1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 THE APPLICANT ............................................................................................................... 3 1.2 NEED FOR THE SCHEME ................................................................................................... 3 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ........................................................................... 5 2.1 LEGISLATIVE PROVISIONS ................................................................................................ 5 2.2 INFORMATION TO BE CONTAINED IN AN EIS ....................................................................... 6 2.3 EIS GUIDANCE ................................................................................................................ 7 2.4 EIA PROCESS ................................................................................................................. 7 2.5 IDENTIFICATION OF LIKELY SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS .............................................................. 8 2.6 CONSULTATION................................................................................................................ 9 2.6.1 Planning Authority Pre Discussions ................................................................. 9 2.6.2 EIS Scoping Consultation................................................................................. 9 2.6.3 Statutory Consultation .................................................................................... 10 2.7 EIS SCOPE ................................................................................................................... 11 2.8 EIS STRUCTURE AND STUDY TEAM ................................................................................ 11 2.9 DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED ......................................................................................... 12 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT......................................................................................... 13 3.1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 13 3.2 LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ................................................................. 13 For inspection purposes only. 3.3 BACKGROUND ...................................................Consent of copyright owner required for any................................................... other use. ......... 16 3.4 EXISTING ALLERGAN FACILITY ........................................................................................ 17 3.5 PROPOSED BIOLOGICS II BUILDING................................................................................. 17 3.6 PROPOSED UTILITIES ..................................................................................................... 18 3.6.1 Electrical Services .......................................................................................... 18 3.6.2 Mechanical Services ...................................................................................... 19 3.6.3 Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) ......................................... 19 3.6.4 Water Supply.................................................................................................. 19 3.6.5 Surface Water................................................................................................. 20 3.6.6 Foul Sewer ..................................................................................................... 20 3.6.7 Process Water................................................................................................ 20 3.6.8 Lighting ........................................................................................................... 21 3.6.9 Fire Services................................................................................................... 21 3.7 SERVICES YARD ............................................................................................................ 21 3.8 TRUCK LOADING DOCK .................................................................................................. 22 3.9 SITE ACCESS, INTERNAL ROADS AND CAR PARKING........................................................ 22 MDE1096Rp0001B iii Rev F01 EPA Export 16-12-2013:23:16:14 Allergan Pharmaceuticals Ireland Biologics Capacity Expansion Project Environmental Impact Statement 3.10 LANDSCAPING................................................................................................................ 23 3.11 PORTWEST SITE ACCESS............................................................................................... 23 3.12 CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPSED DEVELOPMENT........................................................... 23 4 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED............................................................................................. 25 4.1 RATIONALE FOR SITE LOCATION ..................................................................................... 25 4.2 RATIONALE FOR SITE LAYOUT ........................................................................................ 25 5 PLANNING CONTEXT............................................................................................................. 29 5.1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 29 5.2 STRATEGIC PLANNING CONTEXT .................................................................................... 29 5.2.1 National Spatial Strategy 2002-2020 ............................................................. 29 5.2.2 Regional Planning Guidelines for the West Region 2010-2022..................... 32 5.2.3 Mayo County Development Plan 2008-2014 ................................................. 35 5.3 STATUTORY PLANNING CONTEXT ................................................................................... 39 5.3.1 Westport Town & Environs Development Plan 2010-2016............................ 39 5.3.2 Variation No 3 of the Westport Town & Environs Development Plan 2010- 2016................................................................................................................ 45 5.4 PLANNING HISTORY ....................................................................................................... 47 5.4.1 IDA Business and Technology Park and Related Applications...................... 47 5.4.2 Allergan Planning Applications......................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • N5 Longford Bypass Stage 1 Test Trenching
    N5 Longford Bypass Stage 1 Test Trenching An Archaeological Assessment Report for Longford County Council 08E0861 Graham Hull TVAS Ireland Ltd J08/33 28th January 2009 N5 Longford Bypass Stage 1 Test Trenching An Archaeological Assessment Report for Longford County Council Licence No: 08E0861 Graham Hull TVAS Ireland Ltd Job J08/33 28th January 2009 N5 Longford Bypass. Stage 1 Archaeological Test Excavations. Licence No: 08E0861 Summary Site name: N5 Longford Bypass. Stage 1 Test Trenching Townlands: Ballyminion, Aghareagh, Mullagh, Cartrons, Moneylagan, Aghadegnan Parishes: Ballymacormick, Templemichael, Clongesh Barony: Ardagh, Longford County: Longford NGR: Between 211600 274991 and 212790 277258 OS 6” Sheet No: Co. Longford, Sheet 13 Client: Longford County Council, Great Water Street, Longford, Co. Longford Naturally occurring geology: Glacial tills with occasional limestone bedrock outcrops. Peats and riverine silts. TVAS Ireland Job No: J08/33 Licence No: 08E0861 Licence holder: Graham Hull Report author: Graham Hull Site activity: Test trenching Date of fieldwork: 21st October to 7th November 2008 Date of report: 28th January 2009 Summary of results: Centreline with offset test trenching examined 13016.08 linear metres at 2.0m wide (equivalent to 26032.16m²). The total area of the road CPO is 211,320m². The total examined sample percentage was therefore 12.3%. Four archaeological sites were discovered. These sites are:, an iron smelting furnace and associated pit, a medieval/post-medieval inhumation cemetery, a feature with in situ burning and a cluster of three burnt stone deposits. A modern brick-making kiln and a modern pit were also found. In addition, a piece of struck and fire heated flint and a dump of post-medieval pottery were recovered.
    [Show full text]
  • CH3/RCH3163.Pdf, PDF Format 422Kb
    An Bord Pleanála Inspector’s Report Board Reference: 16.CH3163 & 16.JP0001 Re: Mayo County Council Compulsory Purchase Order 2011 (No. 1) – N59 Westport to Mulranny Road Improvement Scheme. Approval under Section 177AE(4) of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended). Location: Townlands of Murrevagh, Bunnahowna, Rosturk, Rosgalliv, Newfield, Knockmanus, Meennacloughfinny, Roskeen North, Knockloughra, Knockbreaga, Carrowbeg (Fergus), Carrowsallagh, Derrycooldrim, Gortfahy, Keeloges (E.D. Newport East), Derrada, Knockalegan, Corraunboy, Carrowkeel (E.D. Newport East), Kiltarnaght, Cahergal, Drumbrastle East, Derryloughan More, Knocknageeha, Corragaun, Gortawarla, Rossow, Rosdooaun, Knocknaboley, Clooneen, Knockysprickaun, Knockychottaun, Cross, Drumard, Conrea, Shanvallybeg, Derrylea, Cranareen, Derrynanaff, Creggaunnahorna, Westport Demesne and Deerpark East; in the D.E.D.s of Newport West, Newport East, Derryloughan, Kilmeena, and Westport Urban, Co. Mayo. Objectors to CPO: - Kathleen Ensko - Eircom Ltd. - Anthony Doyle - Ron & Maite Morrison - Patrick McGreal & Jacqueline McGreal - Michael Patrick Moran & Lilian Ann Moran - Triona Walsh - C. Cusack - Michael & Teresa Staunton - John Ryan - Niall O’Boyle 16.CH3163 & 16.JP0001 An Bord Pleanála Page 1 of 72 - Eugene Owens - Eithne Chambers - George O’Malley - Helena O’Malley - Michael Doyle & James Doyle - Deirdre Leahy - Martin Nevin - Burrishoole Residents Association - Patrick Cusack (Patrick J. Cusack, Solicitors) - Luke Breach (The Planning Partnership) - Gerard Muldowney
    [Show full text]
  • Inspector's Report ABP 300490-17 ABP 300493-17
    Inspector’s Report ABP 300490-17 ABP 300493-17 Development N5 Ballaghaderreen to Scramoge Road Project and Compulsory Purchase Order 2017 Applicant Roscommon County Council Dates of Site Inspection 18th, 19th & 20th September & 8th October, 2018 Dates of Oral Hearing 9th and 10th October, 2018 Inspector Pauline Fitzpatrick ABP 300490-17/ABP 300493-17 Inspector’s Report Page 1 of 146 Contents 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 5 2.0 Proposed Development ....................................................................................... 5 2.1. The Scheme .................................................................................................. 6 2.2. The Routing of the Scheme .......................................................................... 8 2.3. The Need for the Development ..................................................................... 9 2.4. Route Selection ........................................................................................... 11 2.5. Predicted Outcome ..................................................................................... 12 3.0 Submissions from Prescribed Bodies on Proposed Road Development ........... 14 3.1. Inland Fisheries Ireland ............................................................................... 14 3.2. Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht .................................... 15 3.3. Northern and Western Regional Assembly ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Population & Human Health 4.1
    River Deel (Crossmolina) Drainage Scheme in association with 4. POPULATION & HUMAN HEALTH 4.1 INTRODUCTION This section of the Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIAR) describes the potential impacts of the proposed Crossmolina Drainage Scheme on population and human health and has been completed in accordance with the guidance set out by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in ‘Guidelines on Information to be contained in Environmental Impact Statements’ (EPA, 2017) and the European Commission in relation to Environmental Impact Assessment of Projects (Directive 2011/92/EU as amended by 2014/52/EU) including ‘Guidance on Screening’, ‘Guidance on Scoping’ and ‘Guidance on the preparation of the Environmental Impact Assessment Report’. One of the principle considerations in the development process is that people, as individuals or communities, should experience no significant diminution in their quality of life from the direct or indirect impacts arising from the construction and operation of a development. Ultimately, all the impacts of a development impinge on human beings, directly and indirectly, positively and negatively. The key issues examined in this section of the EIAR include population & human health, employment and economic activity, land-use, residential amenity, community facilities and services, tourism, and health and safety. Reference is also made, in this chapter, to nuisance impacts on human beings that are dealt with in other sections of this EIAR such as flooding from Chapter 7 - Hydrology and Hydrogeology;
    [Show full text]
  • Appropriate Assessment Screening Report Derrycashel Bog, Co
    Derrycashel Bog, Co Roscommon Decommissioning and Rehabilitation 2021 Article 6(3) Appropriate Assessment Screening Report Article 6(3) Appropriate Assessment Screening Report Derrycashel Bog, Co Roscommon Decommissioning and Rehabilitation 2021 DOCUMENT DETAILS Client: Bord na Móna Project Title: Derrycashel Bog, Co Roscommon Decommissioning and Rehabilitation 2021 Project Number: 201008 Document Title: Article 6(3) Appropriate Assessment Screening Report Document File AASR F – 2021.04.28- 201008 Name: Prepared By: MKO Tuam Road Galway Ireland H91 VW84 Rev Status Date Author(s) Approved By 01 Draft 24/03/2021 IR PR 01 Final 28/04/2021 IR PR Derrycashel Bog, Co Roscommon Decommissioning and Rehabilitation 2021 Article 6(3) Appropriate Assessment Screening Report Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................ 1 1.1 Background ...................................................... 1 1.2 Appropriate Assessment .......................................... 1 1.2.1 Screening for Appropriate Assessment ...................... 1 1.2.2 Appropriate Assessment (Natura Impact Statement) .......... 2 1.2.3 Statement of authority .................................... 2 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT AND BASELINE ENVIRONMENT ................3 2.1 Site details .................................................... 3 2.1.1 Site location ............................................. 3 2.1.2 Site description .......................................... 3 2.2 Characteristics of the Peatland Climate Action Scheme ..........
    [Show full text]
  • (BMW) Regional Operational Programme 2007-2013
    Public Consultation on Border, Midland and Western (BMW) Regional Operational Programme 2007-2013 Submission from the Western Development Commission April 2006 Western Development Commission Dillon House Ballaghaderreen Co. Roscommon Tel: 094 986 1441 Fax: 094 986 1443 Web: www.wdc.ie 1 Submission from the Western Development Commission (WDC) to the Public Consultation on the Border, Midland and Western (BMW) Regional Operational Programme 2007-2013 1. Introduction The Western Development Commission (WDC) welcomes this opportunity to make a submission to the preparation of the Border, Midland and Western (BMW) Regional Operational Programme 2007-2013. The WDC is a statutory body, under the aegis of DCRAGA, 1 whose remit is to promote, foster and encourage economic and social development in the Western Region. 2 The WDC works in co-operation with national, regional and local bodies involved in western development to: • review and monitor development policy and make appropriate proposals to government departments and agencies; • identify and implement development initiatives, or facilitate their implementation by other relevant organisations; and • assist businesses, social enterprises and projects by managing the WDC Investment Fund amounting to €34 million of exchequer funding.3 The WDC has built up considerable expertise in regional development based on research, analysis, and practice from its initiatives in tourism, organic agri-food and renewable energy. 4 Through this work, the WDC seeks to ensure that government policy responds to the needs of the Western Region as regards infrastructure investment, exploitation of natural resources, enterprise and rural development. In this context, the WDC has made detailed submissions to the Department of Finance outlining our proposals for the National Development Plan 2007-2013, and to the Department of Agriculture and Food, and DCRAGA outlining our proposals for the Rural Development Programme 2007-2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Dealing with Bearing Capacity Problems on Low Volume Roads Constructed on Peat
    Ron Munro DEALING WITH BEARING CAPACITY PROBLEMS ON LOW VOLUME ROADS CONSTRUCTED ON PEAT Including case histories from roads projects within the ROADEX Partner Districts THIS PROJECT IS BEING PART- FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION European Regional Development Fund DEALING WITH BEARING CAPACITY PROBLEMS ON LOW VOLUME ROADS CONSTRUCTED ON PEAT INCLUDING CASE HISTORIES FROM ROADS PROJECTS WITHIN THE ROADEX PARTNER DISTRICTS December 2004 Ron Munro The Highland Council PREFACE This Report is a final report of the Phase 2 ‘Understanding and Analysis’ section of the EU ROADEX II Project and aims to give an insight into the state of the art of road construction and road maintenance for roads constructed across peat in the Northern Periphery of Europe. It will concentrate particularly on the current practices for road construction over peatlands in the four specific Partner Areas of the EU Roadex Project i.e. Troms County in Norway, the Districts of Keski-Suomi and Lapland in Finland, the Region Norr of Sweden and the Highland Area of Scotland. In addition, where appropriate, the report will also refer to relevant peat related experiences being carried out elsewhere in the world where these are considered apposite to the report. The report was written following discussions and meetings with engineers across the Partner areas. The author would like to thank Aarno Valkeisenmäki, Hannu Keralampi, Timo Saarenketo, Jorma Immonen and Martti Eerola from Finland, Karl Melby, Stein Stokkebø, Tor Erik Frydenlund, Roald Aabøe, Kjetil Vollan, Even Øiseth and Inge Hoff from Norway, Peter Carlsten, Johan Ullberg and Gunnar Zweifel from Sweden and Alistair Gilchrist, Frank MacCulloch, Hugh Mackay, Ken Wiseman, Richard Evans, Douglas Bremner and Willie Watt from Scotland for their help and input into the report.
    [Show full text]
  • HA0/DHA0042.Pdf, PDF Format 62Kb
    An Bord Pleanála ROADS ACTS 1993 to 2007 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACTS 2000 to 2014 Mayo County Council An Bord Pleanála Reference Number: 16.HA0042 APPLICATION by Mayo County Council for approval under section 51 of the Roads Act, 1993, as amended, in accordance with documentation, including an environmental impact statement and Natura impact statement, lodged with An Bord Pleanála on the 29 th day of August, 2013. PROPOSED ROAD DEVELOPMENT: A new N5 road development which includes a northern by-pass of Westport and an eastern bypass of Castlebar, an upgrade to the existing N5 east of Castlebar, a bridge crossing of Lough Lannagh and an upgrade to an existing bridge crossing of the Castlebar River, to be located in the townlands of Westport Demesne (ED Westport Urban), Creggaunnahorna, Deerpark East, Attireesh, Westport Demesne (ED Kilmeena), Gortaroe, Carrowbeg, Knockranny, Monamore, Sheeroe, Drummindoo, Carrownaclea, Sheean, Cogaula, Doon, Knockbrack, Bullaunmeneen, Kilbree Lower, Drumneen, Cloonan, Dooleague, Claggarnagh West, Claggarnagh East, Annagh, Cloonkeen, Pheasanthill, Derrylea, Derrycoosh (ED Cloonkeen), Derrynashask, Derrinlevaun, Cloondeash, Aghadrinagh, Lisnageeha or Antigua, Lisnakirka or Milebush, Balloor, Hawthornlodge, Shanvally, Cottage, Drumaleheen, Kilkenny, Doogary (ED Breaghwy), Carheens, Liscromwell, Aghalusky, Ballynew, Ballyneggin, Breandrum or Windsor, Clogher (ED Turlough) Gortnafolla, Knockanour, Turlough, Drumdaff and Capparanny, County Mayo. The proposed road development comprises: • 23.7 kilometres of Type 2 Dual Carriageway. • 2.1 kilometres of Type 2 Single Carriageway. • 0.6 kilometres taper from Type 2 Dual to existing Single Carriageway. ______________________________________________________________ 16.HA0042 An Bord Pleanála Page 1 of 9 • Three compact grade separated junctions including overbridges. • Six roundabouts. • Two at grade left-in left-out junctions and one all movements at grade junction.
    [Show full text]
  • Step 4B Development Options and Evaluation Report North Connacht 110 Kv Project March 2021
    Step 4B Development Options and Evaluation Report North Connacht 110 kV Project March 2021 Mott MacDonald 5 Eastgate Avenue Eastgate Little Island Co Cork T45 EE72 Ireland T +353 (0)21 480 9800 mottmac.com EirGrid plc, The Oval, 160 Shelbourne Road, Step 4B Development Options Ballsbridge, Dublin, and Evaluation Report D04 E7K5. North Connacht 110 kV Project March 2021 Directors: J T Murphy BE HDipMM CEng FIEI FConsEI FIAE (Managing), D Herlihy BE MSc CEng, R Jefferson BSC MSCS MRICS MCIArb DipConLaw, J Shinkwin BE DipMechEng CEng MIEI, M D Haigh BSc CEng FICE MCIWEM (British) Innealtoirí Comhairleach (Consulting Engineers) Company Secretary: Michael Cremin CPA Registered in Ireland no. 53280. Mott MacDonald Ireland Limited is a member of the Mott MacDonald Group Mott MacDonald | Step 4B Development Options and Evaluation Report North Connacht 110 kV Project Issue and Revision Record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description A 1 Feb Caroline Lew Donna Tom Keane Draft for Comment 2021 Paul Foley Hassett B 23 Feb Caroline Lew Donna Tom Keane Draft for Comment 2021 Hassett C 05 March Caroline Lew Donna Tom Keane Final Draft 2021 / Paul Foley Hassett D 15 March Paul Foley Caroline Lew Tom Keane Final Issue 2021 Document reference: 229100591 | 402 | D Information class: Standard This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above- captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Need for the Proposed Road Development
    Roughan & O’Donovan – AECOM Alliance N5 Ballaghaderreen to Scramoge Road Project Consulting Engineers Environmental Impact Assessment Report Chapter 2 Need for the Proposed Road Development 2.1 Introduction This chapter of the EIAR details the need for the proposed N5 Ballaghaderreen to Scramoge Road Development based on planning policy, the deficiencies in the existing road network and identified future needs of the N5 corridor. This introductory section provides an overview of the key issues, which are then set out in detail in the following sections. Objectives are then set out for the project and the anticipated outcomes for the proposed development are considered against these objectives. 2.1.1 Policy Background The need for the N5 to be upgraded to be a high quality road is clearly set out in European, National, Regional and Local Policy. Under Regulation (EU) 1315/2013 the N5 forms part of the EU TEN-T Comprehensive Network, connecting County Mayo and the Western Region to the European Core Network and onward to Dublin and the rest of Europe, and must meet the defined criteria for a High Quality Road. 2.1.2 Existing Road Network The N5 national primary route is 134km in length, connecting Westport in County Mayo to Longford Town, where it joins the N4 which continues to Dublin. The N5 serves a large geographical area and provides a strategic function in terms of connecting the Western Region of Ireland to the Midlands and the East of the country, and providing access to Ireland West Airport Knock. Previous and ongoing investment has enabled 72% of the length of the N5 to be brought up to modern standards appropriate for a high quality road, with the outstanding section between the eastern end of the Ballaghaderreen Bypass and Scramoge remaining unimproved.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Human Beings, Population & Human Health 4.1
    River Deel (Crossmolina) Drainage Scheme in association with 4. HUMAN BEINGS, POPULATION & HUMAN HEALTH 4.1 INTRODUCTION This section of the Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIAR) describes the potential impacts of the proposed Crossmolina Flood Relief Scheme (FRS) on human beings and has been completed in accordance with the guidance set out by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in ‘Guidelines on Information to be contained in Environmental Impact Statements’ (EPA, 2017). One of the principle concerns in the development process is that people, as individuals or communities, should experience no diminution in their quality of life from the direct or indirect impacts arising from the construction and operation of a development. Ultimately, all the impacts of a development impinge on human beings, directly and indirectly, positively and negatively. The key issues examined in this section of the EIAR include population, employment and economic activity, land-use, residential amenity, community facilities and services, tourism, and health and safety. Reference is also made, in this chapter, to nuisance impacts on human beings that are dealt with in other sections of this EIAR such as flooding from Chapter 7 - Hydrology and Hydrogeology; dust and noise from Chapter 8 - Air and Climate; and traffic from Chapter 11 - Material Assets. 4.2 RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT 4.2.1 Methodology The following sources of information and literature pertinent to the area were used in the preparation of this section: . Census of Ireland, . Regional Planning Guidelines for the West Region 2010-2022, . Mayo County Development Plan, 2014-2020, . Mayo County Council Website, . Fáilte Ireland, . Local Community Websites www.crossmolina.ie Information regarding human beings and general socio-economic data were sourced from the Central Statistics Office (CSO), the County Mayo Development Plan 2009 – 2015, Fáilte Ireland and any other literature pertinent to the area.
    [Show full text]
  • 31St March 2018 Ann Clarke
    1 Facility Information Summary AER Reporting Year 2017 Licence Register Number W0163-01 Name of site Bruscar Bhearna Teoranta Site Location Ballaghaderreen, County Roscommon NACE Code 3821 Class/Classes of Activity 50.1 National Grid Reference (6E, 6 N) 161255E, 295035N Bruscar Bhearna Teoranta operators a Waste Transfer Facility at Ballaghaderreen Industrial Estate, A description of the activities/processes Ballaghaderreen, County Roscommon. The facility currently operators in accordance with a Waste Licence at the site for the reporting year. This W0163-01, under this licence Bruscar Bhearna Teoranta is licensed to accept non-hazardous waste consisting of should include information such as household, commercial, and construction and demolition waste. The maximum annual quantity of waste to be production increases or decreases on site, accepted at the facility is 19,700 tpa, the total quantity accepted at the premises in the reporting period was any infrastructural changes, 19,268 tonnes. The primary functions of the facility are to segregate waste, recycle waste and to bulk waste prior environmental performance which was to transportation to recovery facilities or licensed landfills/incinerator. No Infrastructure work carried out in 2017. measured during the reporting year and All licence monitoring in 2017 namely Water, Dust and Noise were in compliance with our EPA Licence. an overview of compliance with your We achieved a recycling rate of 48% in 2017 we did not achieve our target rate of 55%. licence listing all exceedances of licence limits (where applicable) and what they relate to e.g. air, water, noise. Declaration: All the data and information presented in this report has been checked and certified as being accurate.
    [Show full text]