AND THEIR HOST PLANTS by Robert Ashby Flock a Thesis Submitted To

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AND THEIR HOST PLANTS by Robert Ashby Flock a Thesis Submitted To The distribution of Arizona leafhoppers and their host plants Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Flock, Robert A., 1914- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 01/10/2021 00:21:57 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/552049 THE DISTRIBUTION .OF ARIZONA LEAFH0PP2R3 AND THEIR HOST PLANTS by Robert Ashby Flock A Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Department of Entomology and Economic Zoology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Graduate College University of Arizona 1940 Approved: Major Professor c;i ; £ 9 y ? / A CKE' O’. .’LSDGE.ISNT I would like to express my appreciation to Dr. E. D Ball, Dr. 0. T. VorhjLGs, and Dr. L. P. V/ehrle, who have made it possible for me to work on this group of insects V CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Distribution and Host Plants of Arizona Species Family ClCADELLIDAE 9 Subfamily PAROPINAE Koebelia o tD Subfamily AGALLINAE 10 Agalliopsis 10 Agallla 12 Certagallia 13 Aceratagallia 15 Subfamily MACROPSIDAE 18 Bythosoopus 18 Macropsis 18 Subfamily IDIOCERINAE 19 Idiocerus 19 Subfamily CICADELLININAE 23 Oncometopia 23 Homalodisca 24 Neokolla 24 Ciboyia 25 Cicadella 25 Siminius 25 Helochara 26 Graphocephala 26 Draeculacephala 26 Cameocephala 27 Subfamily GYPONINAE Dragonana 27 Gyponana 27 Gypona 29 Prairiana 29 Ponana 30 Xerophloea 32 Subfamily JASSINAE 32 Memnonia 32 Xestocephalus 33 Nionia 33 Dorycephalus 34 -i- Heoalus 34 Spangbergiella 34 Parabolocratus 35 Dicyphonia 36 Aligia 36 Mesaaia 37 Bandara 38 Twinlngia 38 Soaphoideus..... 39 Osbornellus - 39 Prescottla 40 Soaphytbpeus 41 Flexamia 44 Latulus . 46 Pains 46 Polynamia 46 Hebecephalus 47 Laevacephalus 48 Ampllcephalus 49 Deltocephalus - 49 Lonatura 50 Klnonla 50 Gillettielia 50 Athysanella 51 Drlotura 51 Uhoka 51 Athysanus 52 Bxitlanus 52 Limnlotettlz 52 Ophiola 53 Coramulus 53 Stlrelus 53 Penestirellus 54 Eutettix 54 Atanus 55 Opsins 55 Horvellina Ollarianus ■ : II Horvellina 57 Menosoma' 59 Phlepsins 59 Phlepsius 60 Texananus 61 Acinopterus 63 Idiodonns 65 Colladonus 66 Conodonus 67 Doleranus 67 Friscananus 68 Ballana 68 Gyperana 69 Elymana 70 Chlorotettix 70 — 11 Jassus 71 Neoeoelidia 71 Paracoelidia 73 Balclutha 74 Nesosteles 74 Baldulus 75 Macrosteles 75 Sonronlus 76 Subfamily TYPHLOCYBINAE 76 Protalebra 76 Dlkraneura 76 Alconeura 79 Empoasca 81 Idona 88 Typhlocyba 88 Eupteryz 89 Hymetta 89 Erythroneura 89 Family MEMBRA.CIDAE 94 Subfamily SMILIINAE 94 Ceresa 94 Stictocephala 96 Stictolobus 97 Micrutalis 98 Parantonae 98 Glossonotus 98 Hiliria 99 Palonica 99 Telamona 99 Tropldarnis 100 Antianthe 100 Telamonanthe 100 Cyrtolobus 100 Ophiderma 101 Vanduzea 101 Bajulata 102 Amastris 102 Polyglypta 103 Bryantla 103 Publilia 103 Entylia 104 Subfamily DARNINAE 104 Stlctopelta 104 Aconophora 105 Subfamily H0PL0PH0RINAE 105 Platycotis 105 ill- Subfamily MEMBRACINAE 105 Bnchenopa 105 Hypsoprora 106 Campyienehia 106 Tylopelta 106 Philya 107 Leiosc^.ta 107 . Subfamily OMTROTINAE 107 Miorooentrus 107 Platyoentrus 108 Tylooentrus 108 Tuberculooentrus 108 Centrodontus 108 Multareis 108 Subfamily AETHALIOHIHAE 109 Aethalion 109 Family CERCOPIDAE 110 Tomaapis 110 Aphrophora 110 Clastoptera 111 Philaronia 115 Family FULGORIDAE 117 Subfamily FULGORINAS 117 Soolopsella 117 Rhabdooephala 117 Amyole 117 Calyptoprootus 118 Cyrpoptus 118 Poblioia 119 Subfamily DICTYOFHORINAE 119 Seolops 119 Yucanaa 128 Or game ra 123 Deserta 123 Orgerius 183 Acinaca 124 Ticidia 124 Timonidia 125 Subfamily ACHILHAE 125 Elidiptera 125 Catonia 125 Subfamily CIXIIHAE 127 Oliarus 127 — iv— Oliaronus 130 Cixius 130 Oeolidlus 131 Plntalia 132 Mlcroledrida 132 Oecleus 133 Myndus 136 Subfamily L3SBJAE 138 Fitohlella 138 Bruohomorpha 139 Aphelonema 141 Papagona 142 Hysteropterum 143 Ulixes 144 Tylana 144 Thlonia 145 Picumna 145 Buthiscia 145 Naettteus 145 Misodeaa 146 Dietyssonla 146 Osbornia 146 / Subfamily ACAMLONIIHAE 147 Acanalonia 147 Subfamily FIATHAE 148 Ormenis 148 Misthamophantia 149 Flatoides 150 Subfamily DERBHAE 150 Cedusa 150 Cenchrea 150 Amalopota 151 Anotia 151 Otiooerus 152 Bothiooerus 152 Subfamily DELPHAOHJAE . 152 Copicerus 152 Sacoharodyne 152 Stenocranus 153 Bostaera 153 Stobaera 153 Liburnia • 153 Pissonotus 153 Factors Influencing the Distribution 154 Bibliography 159 THE DISTRIBUTION OF ARIZONA LEAFHOPPBRS . AND THEIR HOST PLANTS Introduction For the past twelve years the leafhopper collection and library o f Dr. E. D. Ball has been located at the University of - .Arizona, This collection and the associated field notes contained the data from a very complete study of the species found in Arizona, The writer made a sur­ vey of the biological data pertaining to Arizona leaf- hoppers which.was finished just before the collection was shipped to the National Museum. A. survey of the literature was also made in order to have a complete list of the species found in the state and additional biological data. Considerable time was spent in determining unidentified material with which valuable biological data was associated more information will be available when the unmounted and unidentified material in the collection is worked up at the National Museum. The writer has worked with Dr. Ball for several years and is familiar with the collection and notes. He has collected leafhoppers and other insects in many parts of the state, often with Dr. Ball, and is familiar with the places which are discussed in the notes. This paper con­ sists largely of records made by Dr. Ball and interpreted -1- —2w by the writer. The.term leafhopper is used in this paper in the general sense meaning not only the Clcadellidae or true leafhoppers, but also the Membracidae or treehoppers, the Cercopidae or spittlebugs, and the Fulgoridae or waxhoppers. These four families are quite similar in habits and are closely related to;each other. They are usually studied together because the methods of collecting and preparing specimens for study are much the same for each of the groups. These four families and the family Cicadidae consti­ tute the suborder Auchenorrhyncha of the order Homoptera. The order Homoptera is a very large group of diversified insects which is difficult to characterize collectively. All species are plant feeders and have mouth parts of the piercing-sucking type, without palpi. The wings when present are of a nearly, uniform texture. The Cicadidae are distinguished from the leafhoppers by having hind legs which are not fitted'for jumping. They are large species with entirely membranous wings. The nymphs are sub­ terranean. The suborder Sterrnorrhyncha contains the scales, aphids, white flies and jumping plant lice. The Auchenorrhyncha are distinguished from the Sterrnorrhyncha by having the beak plainly arising from the base of the — 3— head, and the tarsi, at least of the middle and hind legs, three jointed. They are always free living insects. The leafhopper fauna of Arizona is extremely rich. For example, of the 1,725 picadellidae which have been found in the United States, nearly 600 species have been found in Arizona. There are 94 Membracidae included in the present paper in comparison with 35 in a recent list of the Membracidae of Utah (Jorgenson), or 201 kinds re­ corded in the Van Duzee catalogue of North America. There are 182 species of Fulgoridae recorded from the state while Dozier lists 132 from Mississippi and Van Duzee lists 362 from the United States. This great variety of species is partially a result of the large number of different cli­ matic and floristic areas in the state. Also the state is so situated that we not only have a large percentage of the North American forms but we also have many forms whose affinities are with the fauna of Mexico and South America. • Our large number of recorded species is a result of the thorough work done in the state by Dr. Ball and other workers. He has built up one of the most important collec­ tions in the country. In 1932 it contained 2,800 species, 510 types, and paratypes of 600 species, totalling in all over 60,000 specimens. Since that time he has added a large amount of Arizona material. - 4 - In this state there is. an unusually good opportunity to study the ecological relationships of the leafhoppers. Plants and plant associations are often distinctly segre­ gated and the specific relationships can often be accu­ rately determined. These specific plant relationships are very important and will be listed wherever possible. When no specific relationship is known for a species, the distribution will be recorded by means of the life zone or geographic area. Specific localities have not been transferred from the notes in most cases. In the case of polyphagous species the type of plant upon which it is •found is usually given. Some species, for instance, are found on many types, of trees, and others on many types of herbaceous plants. " The most distinctive leafhopper fauna is found in the Lower Sonoran Zone. This zone includes those portions of the western and southern part of the state which are below about 4,000 to 4,500 feet in elevation. Typical plants are the creosote bush (Larrea tridentata), palo verde (Parkinsonia miorophylla), mesquite (Prosopis velutina), and the desert grassland. The Upper Sonoran Zone is the richest zone in regard to the number of kinds of leafhoppers. This zone occurs from 4,500 feet to 6,500 feet in the mountains. J,ive oaks pinon pine (Pinus edulis) , .juniper, sage brush (Artemisia tridentata), are typical plants, and the chaparral and northern short grassland are important plant associations in this zone. The Transition Zone occupies a considerable portion of the state. Its characteristic plants are yellow pine (Finns ponderosa). Chihuahua pine (Finns leiophylla). and Gambel oak (Q,uercus gambelii). This zone usually occurs between 6,500 to 8,000 feet elevation.
Recommended publications
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Coronado National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Coronado National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Gypsy Moth Management in the - Vegetation management Completed Actual: 11/28/2012 01/2013 Susan Ellsworth United States: A Cooperative (other than forest products) 775-355-5313 Approach [email protected]. EIS us *UPDATED* Description: The USDA Forest Service and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service are analyzing a range of strategies for controlling gypsy moth damage to forests and trees in the United States. Web Link: http://www.na.fs.fed.us/wv/eis/ Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Nationwide. Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2021 12/2021 Sarah Shoemaker 228, subpart A. Orders NOI in Federal Register 907-586-7886 EIS 09/13/2018 [email protected] d.us *UPDATED* Est. DEIS NOA in Federal Register 03/2021 Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. These regulations apply to all NFS lands open to mineral entry under the US mining laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesozoic Stratigraphy of the Patagonia Mountains and Adjoining Areas, Santa Cruz County, Arizona
    Mesozoic Stratigraphy of the Patagonia Mountains and Adjoining Areas, Santa Cruz County, Arizona GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 658-E Mesozoic Stratigraphy of the Patagonia Mountains and Adjoining Areas, Santa Cruz County, Arizona By FRANK S. SIMONS MESOZOIC STRATIGRAPHY IN SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 658-E Descriptive stratigraphy of Triassic, Jurassic, and Cretaceous rocks that are mainly rhyolites but that include some sedimentary rocks and intermediate volcanic rocks UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1972 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS G. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. A. Radlinski, Acting Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 40 cents (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-1205 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract El Cretaceous rocks . E13 Introduction 1 Bisbee Formation . .. 13 Triassic and Jurassic rocks... ... ... ... 2 Fossils and age. _....... 16 Canelo Hills Volcanics. ... ... 2 Volcanic rocks of lower Alum Gulch 16 Triassic or Jurassic rocks ._- . 3 Volcanic rocks of Dove Canyon.. 17 Volcanic rocks in the southern Patagonia Trachyandesite of Meadow Valley 18 Mountains ... __ __ . .... 3 Tuff and shale.... ... ..... 18 UX Ranch block . 3 Thin lava flows 19 Duquesne block.........._ ..... .. ...... 3 Thick lava flows 20 Corral Canyon block..... _ . .. 6 Chemical composition 20 Volcaniclastic sequence . .._ . 6 Alteration of trachyandesitic lavas. ... 20 Volcanic sequence.. .._. 7 Age .. - - 21 American Mine block. .._ 8 Cretaceous or Tertiary rocks ... ......... 21 Thunder Mine block _ 9 Volcanic rocks of the Humboldt Chemical composition... ....... ....... 9 mine-Trench Camp area ... ... 21 Age and correlation.. 10 Volcanic rocks of Red Mountain 22 Volcanic and sedimentary rocks References cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Granite Peak Stock Area, Whetstone Mountains, Cochise County, Arizona
    Geology of the Granite Peak stock area, Whetstone Mountains, Cochise County, Arizona Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic); maps Authors DeRuyter, Vernon Donald Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 07/10/2021 05:09:43 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/555132 GEOLOGY OF THE GRANITE PEAK STOCK AREA, WHETSTONE MOUNTAINS, COCHISE COUNTY, ARIZONA by Vernon Donald DeRuyter A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 7 9 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of require­ ments for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Re­ quests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major de­ partment or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the pro­ posed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Geologic Structures Between Lordsburg, New Mexico, and Tucson, Arizona Harald D
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/29 Major geologic structures between Lordsburg, New Mexico, and Tucson, Arizona Harald D. Drewes and C. H. Thorman, 1978, pp. 291-295 in: Land of Cochise (Southeastern Arizona), Callender, J. F.; Wilt, J.; Clemons, R. E.; James, H. L.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 29th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 348 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1978 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Stories of the Sky Islands: Exhibit Development Resource Guide for Biology and Geology at Chiricahua National Monument and Coronado National Memorial
    Stories of the Sky Islands: Exhibit Development Resource Guide for Biology and Geology at Chiricahua National Monument and Coronado National Memorial Prepared for the National Park Service under terms of Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit Agreement H1200-05-0003 Task Agreement J8680090020 Prepared by Adam M. Hudson,1 J. Jesse Minor,2,3 Erin E. Posthumus4 In cooperation with the Arizona State Museum The University of Arizona Tucson, AZ Beth Grindell, Principal Investigator May 17, 2013 1: Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona ([email protected]) 2: School of Geography and Development, University of Arizona ([email protected]) 3: Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, University of Arizona 4: School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona ([email protected]) Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................3 Beth Grindell, Ph.D. Ch. 1: Current research and information for exhibit development on the geology of Chiricahua National Monument and Coronado National Memorial, Southeast Arizona, USA..................................................................................................................................... 5 Adam M. Hudson, M.S. Section 1: Geologic Time and the Geologic Time Scale ..................................................5 Section 2: Plate Tectonic Evolution and Geologic History of Southeast Arizona .........11 Section 3: Park-specific Geologic History – Chiricahua
    [Show full text]
  • Beitrag Zur Kenntnis Der Neotropischen Membraciden Gattung Tylopelta Fowler, 1894 531-540 ©Zoologisches Museum Hamburg, 531
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Entomologische Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum Hamburg Jahr/Year: 1969 Band/Volume: 4 Autor(en)/Author(s): Strümpel Hans Artikel/Article: Beitrag zur Kenntnis der neotropischen Membraciden Gattung Tylopelta Fowler, 1894 531-540 ©Zoologisches Museum Hamburg, www.zobodat.at 531 Ent. Mitt. Zool. Mus. Hamburg Bd. 4 (1974), S. 531—540 Beitrag zur Kenntnis der neotropischen Membraciden Gattung Tylopelta F ow ler, 1894 Von H ans S trümpel x) (Mit 13 Abbildungen im Text)2) In der vorliegenden Arbeit werden einige Anmerkungen zu Arten der Gattung Tylopelta (Homoptera, Membracidae) hinsichtlich der Wertigkeit diagnostischer Merkmale gemacht. Das zur Untersuchung herangezogene Material stammt aus den Sammlungen des Zoologischen Instituts und Zoologischen Museums Hamburg, der California Academy of Science, San Francisco, The American Museum of Natural History, New York, und dem Moravske Museum Brno. Als F owler 1894 die Gattung Tylopelta aufstellte, charakterisierte er sie wie folgt: „Genus Tropidoscytae (Tropidoscyta S tal , 1869, ist jetzt Sy­ nonym für Erechtia W alker , 1858 — Anmk. d. Verf.) affine, sed pronoto maxime inaequali et gibbero areisque tegminum (discoidalibus tribus, api- calibus quique) minus oblongis“, und er fügte hinzu: „Allied to Tropi­ doscyta, but distinguished by the extremly uneven outline of the prono- tum, which is level or almost level in the last-mentioned genus, but in the present genus is deeply and broadly excised in the middle and again before the apex; besides the central and two side carinae there is only one short and broad carina above the eyes; the tegmina have the areas less oblong.“ Diese Charakterisierung bezog sich auf eine einzige Art und zwar auf Tropidoscyta gibbera S tal (Generotypus).
    [Show full text]
  • Uranium Mineralization in the Guindani Canyon Area of the Northern Whetstone Mountains, Cochise County, Arizona
    Uranium mineralization in the Guindani Canyon area of the northern Whetstone Mountains, Cochise County, Arizona by Russell M. Corn, Richard Ahern, and Jon Spencer Arizona Geological Survey Contributed Report CR-08-B version 1.0 June 2008 21 page text Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress St., #100, Tucson, Arizona 85701 The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the Arizona Geological Survey. 1 Arizona Geological Survey Contributed Report CR-08-B Proposed Mineral Withdrawal, Guindani Basin Area Northern Whetstone Mts., Cochise County, AZ Russell M. Corn (Registered Geologist) ______________________________________ The Coronado National Forest proposed a mineral withdrawal of approximately 2,600 acres covering all of the Guindani Basin drainage as shown on the attached copy of a topographic map. The proposed withdrawal includes virtually all of the Northern Whetstone Mining District, an area with numerous old small mines, prospects, known occurrences and past production of uranium, tungsten, fluorite and silica. It also includes the entire surface exposures of unusual alaskitic altered granite that contains disseminated fluorite and uranium minerals. Attached are copies of gamma logs and uranium assay logs fro three drill holes in the alaskite and a copy of a summary of Rocky Mountain Energy’s drilling results for uranium in shear and fracture zones on claims north of the alaskite exposures. The uranium exploration effort was carried out between 1973 and 1976 and the effort was terminated when the bottom dropped out of the uranium market.
    [Show full text]
  • Geodatabase of Post-Wildfire Study
    Geodatabase of Post-Wildfire Study Basins Assessing the predictive strengths of post-wildfire debris-flow models in Arizona and defining rainfall intensity-duration thresholds for initiation of post-fire debris flow Ann Youberg DIGITAL INFORMATION DI-44 July 2015 Arizona Geological Survey www.azgs.az.gov | repository.azgs.az.gov Arizona Geological Survey M. Lee Allison, State Geologist and Director Manuscript approved for publication in July 2015 Printed by the Arizona Geological Survey All rights reserved For an electronic copy of this publication: www.repository.azgs.az.gov Printed copies are on sale at the Arizona Experience Store 416 W. Congress, Tucson, AZ 85701 (520.770.3500) For information on the mission, objectives or geologic products of the Arizona Geological Survey visit www.azgs.az.gov. This publication was prepared by an agency of the State of Arizona. The State of Arizona, or any agency thereof, or any of their employees, makes no warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report. Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the State of Arizona. ___________________________ Suggested Citation: Youberg A., 2015, Geodatabase of Post-Wildfire Study Basins: Assessing the predictive strengths of post-wildfire debris-flow models inArizona, and defining rainfall intensity-duration thresholds for
    [Show full text]
  • Social Behaviour and Life History of Membracine Treehoppers
    Journal of Natural History, 2006; 40(32–34): 1887–1907 Social behaviour and life history of membracine treehoppers CHUNG-PING LIN Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA and Department of Life Science, Center for Tropical Ecology and Biodiversity, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan (Accepted 28 September 2006) Abstract Social behaviour in the form of parental care is widespread among insects but the evolutionary histories of these traits are poorly known due to the lack of detailed life history data and reliable phylogenies. Treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae) provide some of the best studied examples of parental care in insects in which maternal care involving egg guarding occurs frequently. The Membracinae exhibit the entire range of social behaviour found in the treehoppers, ranging from asocial solitary individuals, nymphal or adult aggregations, to highly developed maternal care with parent–offspring communication. Within the subfamily, subsocial behaviour occurs in at least four of the five tribes. The Aconophorini and Hoplophorionini are uniformly subsocial, but the Membracini is a mixture of subsocial and gregarious species. The Hypsoprorini contains both solitary and gregarious species. Accessory secretions are used by many treehoppers to cover egg masses inserted into plant tissue while oviposition on plant surfaces is restricted to a few species. Presumed aposematic colouration of nymphs and teneral adults appears to be restricted to gregarious and subsocial taxa. Ant mutualism is widespread among membracine treehoppers and may play an important role in the evolutionary development of subsocial behaviour. The life history information provides a basis for comparative analyses of maternal care evolution and its correlation with ant mutualism in membracine treehoppers.
    [Show full text]
  • Correlation of Volcanic Rocks in Santa Cruz County, Arizona
    87 CORRELATION OF VOLCANIC ROCKS IN SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, ARIZONA By Otner J. Taylor A study of the volcanic rocks in Santa Cruz County, Arizona, has been tnade through cotnpilation of previous work together with new investigations. These cotnpilations indicate that there are tnany sitnilarities of sequence and structure in the volcanic rocks of the Atascosa Mountains, Tutnacacori Mountains, Santa Rita Mountains, Patagonia Mountains, and Mustang Mountains of Santa Cruz County. The volcanic rocks of the Tucson Mountains to the north of Pitna County also show sitnilarities to the volcanic rocks in the ranges of Santa Cruz County. Previous studies were tnade in the Atascosa and Tutnacacori Mountains by Webb and Coryell (1954). The regional geology of the Santa Rita and Patagonia Mountains was tnapped by Schraeder (1915) although tnany localized studies have since been tnade by various authors. The geology of the Mustang Mountains was tnapped by Bryant (1951). The Tucson Mountains have been studied principally by Brown (1939) and Kinnison (1958). A stratigraphic colutnn of the volcanic rocks of each range has been construc­ ted. These colutnns are shown on Plate 1. The generalized sequence in each case is: Cretaceous (?) andesite and rhyolite; Tertiary andesite, rhyolite, tuff, rhyolite-latite, and andesite; and Quaternary (?) basalt. The rocks were dated by using the principle of superposition as well as the following hypotheses: the rocks thought to be Cretaceous also are badly faulted and tilted and a pre-Laratnide age is suggested; the rocks thought to be Tertiary are thick and only gently tilted so that a post-Laratnide age is suggested; the upper andesites of this Tertiary sequence are not tilted, and they are probably post-Lower Miocene since they have structural and sequential sitnilarities with the andesites associated with the Lower Miocene Minetta beds and their probable equivalent, the Pantano fortnation; the rocks thought to be Quaternary are rela­ tively undisturbed and they overlie gravels and lake beds thought to be late Pliocene and Pleistocene.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science
    236 Proceedings of Indiana Academy of Science AN ANNOTATED LIST OF THE MEMBRACIDAE OF INDIANA (HOMOPTERA) Howard 0. Deay and George E. Gould, Purdue University 1 The members of the family Membracidae are commonly called tree- hoppers. One of their number, the buffalo treehopper (Ceresa bubalus), is widely known as a pest of apples. However, this species has doubtless been confused in the past with Ceresa borealis and C. taurina. C. basalis and Stictocephala inermis also injure apple trees by ovipositing in the one and two year old twigs. E?ichenopa binotata has been observed to injure butternut in the same manner. C. bubalus is suspected of being a mechanical carrier of the causative organism of the Dutch elm disease. No formal list of the species of Membracidae occurring in Indiana exists. In fact there are but few references in the literature to their occurrence in the state and none that deal with local distribution. Baldwin (l) 2 in 1914 recorded the buffalo treehopper in Indiana. Van Duzee (4) records two additional species from the state in his well known catalogue of the Hemiptera. Funkhouser (3), in his catalogue of the Membracidae of the world, records 23 species from the state in addition to the three mentioned above. Ball (2), in 1932, records four species from Indiana, two of which had been previously reported by Funkhouser, Thus a total of 28 species of Membracidae have been re- ported in the literature as occurring in Indiana. The writers in the present paper add 29 species to the list making a total of 57 species, representing four subfamilies and 21 genera which are known to occur in the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis and Dissertation Index of Arizona Geology to December 1979
    Arizona Geological Society Digest, Volume XII, 1980 261 Thesis and Dissertation Index of Arizona Geology to December 1979 From The University of Arizona, Arizona State University, and Northern Arizona University compiled by 1 Gregory R. Wessel Introduction This list is a compilation of all graduate theses and dissertations completed at The University of Arizona, Arizona State University, and Northern Arizona University concerning the geology of Arizona. The list is complete through December 1979. To facilitate the use of this list as a reference, papers are arranged alphabetically into five sec­ tions on the basis of study area. Four sections cover the four quadrants of the state of Arizona us­ ing the Gila and Salt River Meridian and Base Line (Fig. 1), and the fifth section contains theses that pertain to the entire state. A thesis or dissertation that includes work in two quadrants is listed under both sections. Those covering subjects or areas outside of the geology of Arizona are omitted. This list was compiled from tabulations of geology theses graciously supplied by each university. Although care was taken to include all theses, some may have been inadvertently overlooked. It is hoped that readers will report any omissions so they may be included in Digest XIII. Digest XIII will contain an update of work 114 113 112 III 110 I 9 completed at Arizona universities, as well as a 37 list of theses and dissertations on Arizona geol­ ogy completed at universities outside of the state. Grateful acknowledgment is made of the assist­ 36 ance of Tom L. Heidrick, who inspired the pro- N£ ject and who, with Joe Wilkins, Jr.
    [Show full text]