DOCSLIB.ORG

A10a Binnenwerk

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A10a Binnenwerk Hotspots Definition Study Reportnumber: KvR 010/2010 Hotspots Definition Study Reportnumber: KvR 010/2010 Authors: Climate changes Spatial Planning: Florrie de Pater Brinkman Climate Change: Sander Brinkman Arcadis: Drs. Eric Schellekens ISBN 978-90-8815-005-0 This project (A10a: Hotspots Definition Study) was carried out (March – June 2006) in the framework of the Dutch National Research Programme Climate changes Spatial Planning. Copyright © 2010 National Research Programme Climate changes Spatial Planning / Nationaal Onderzoekprogramma Klimaat voor Ruimte (KvR) All rights reserved. Nothing in this publication may be copied, stored in automated databases or published without prior written consent of the National Research Programme Climate changes Spatial Planning / Nationaal Onderzoekprogramma Klimaat voor Ruimte. In agreement with Article 15a of the Dutch Law on authorship is allowed to quote sections of this publication using a clear reference to this publication. Liability The National Research Programme Climate changes Spatial Planning and the authors of this publication have exercised due caution in preparing this publication. However, it can not be expelled that this publication includes mistakes or is incomplete. Any use of the content of this publication is for the own responsibility of the user. The Foundation Climate changes Spatial Planning (Stichting Klimaat voor Ruimte), its organisation members, the authors of this publication and their organisations can not be held liable for any damages resulting from the use of this publication. Contents Summary .......................................................................................................... iv Samenvatting ................................................................................................... v 1. Introduction .............................................................................................. 1 2. Goal ......................................................................................................... 3 3. Method ..................................................................................................... 5 4. Results ..................................................................................................... 7 4.1 Work shops .............................................................................................. 7 4.2 Interviews ................................................................................................ 7 5. Analysis ................................................................................................. 11 5.1 First selection of hotspots ...................................................................... 11 5.2 Prioritising hotspots ............................................................................... 15 5.2.1 Matrix ..................................................................................................... 15 5.2.2 Regional distribution ....................................................................... 17 5.2.3 Thematic coverage ......................................................................... 18 5.2.4 Target groups ........................................................................................ 19 5.2.5 Conclusion ............................................................................................. 19 6. Draft ToRs of the selected hotspots ...................................................... 21 6.1 Draft ToR Biesbosch–Haringvliet .......................................................... 21 6.1.1 Problem definition ........................................................................... 21 6.1.2 Time horizon and planning ............................................................. 21 6.1.3 Stakeholders ................................................................................... 22 6.1.4 Matching funding ............................................................................ 22 6.1.5 Research questions ........................................................................ 22 6.1.6 Linkage with current CcSP research .............................................. 23 6.2 Draft ToR Kampen Region .................................................................... 23 6.2.1 Problem definition ........................................................................... 23 6.2.2 Time horizon and planning ............................................................. 23 6.2.3 Stakeholders ................................................................................... 24 6.2.4 Matching funding ............................................................................ 25 6.2.5 Research questions ........................................................................ 25 6.2.6 Linkage with current CcSP research .............................................. 25 6.3 Draft ToR Zuidplaspolder ...................................................................... 25 6.3.1 Problem definition ........................................................................... 25 6.3.2 Time horizon and planning ............................................................. 26 6.3.3 Stakeholders ................................................................................... 26 6.3.4 Matching funding ............................................................................ 26 6.3.5 Research questions ........................................................................ 26 6.3.6 Linkage with current CcSP research .............................................. 27 6.4 Draft ToR Delta Waters ......................................................................... 27 6.4.1 Problem definition ........................................................................... 27 6.4.2 Time horizon and planning ............................................................. 28 6.4.3 Stakeholders ................................................................................... 28 6.4.4 Matching funding ............................................................................ 28 6.4.5 Research questions ........................................................................ 28 6.4.6 Linkage with current CcSP research .............................................. 29 KvR report 010/2008 6.5 Draft ToR Tilburg ................................................................................... 29 6.5.1 Problem definition ........................................................................... 29 6.5.2 Time horizon and planning ............................................................. 30 6.5.3 Stakeholders ................................................................................... 30 6.5.4 Matching funding ............................................................................ 31 6.5.5 Research questions ........................................................................ 31 6.5.6 Linkage with current CcSP research .............................................. 31 6.6 Draft ToR Grounds for Change ............................................................. 32 6.6.1 Problem definition ........................................................................... 32 6.6.2 Time horizon and planning ............................................................. 33 6.6.3 Stakeholders ................................................................................... 33 6.6.4 Matching funding ............................................................................ 33 6.6.5 Research questions ........................................................................ 33 6.7 Draft ToR Noordoostpolder ................................................................... 34 6.7.1 Problem definition ........................................................................... 35 6.7.2 Time horizon and planning ............................................................. 36 6.7.3 Stakeholders ................................................................................... 36 6.7.4 Matching funding ............................................................................ 36 6.7.5 Research questions ........................................................................ 36 6.7.6 Linkage with current CcSP research .............................................. 36 6.8 Draft ToR Oude Vaart Valley ................................................................. 37 6.8.1 Problem definition ........................................................................... 37 6.8.2 Time horizon and planning ............................................................. 37 6.8.3 Stakeholders ................................................................................... 38 6.8.4 Matching funding ............................................................................ 38 6.8.5 Research questions ........................................................................ 38 6.8.6 Linkage with current CcSP research .............................................. 38 6.9 Draft ToR Arnhem-Nijmegen city region (KAN) .................................... 38 6.9.1 Problem definition ........................................................................... 39 6.9.2 Time horizon and planning ............................................................. 39 6.9.3 Stakeholders ................................................................................... 39 6.9.4 Matching funding ............................................................................ 39 6.9.5 Research questions .......................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inside This Issue: Portive of the Idea of a Merger Into Sea Completely
    DutchovenArt Newsletter “Down memory lane the culinary way.” Volume 1– Issue 23 - October, 2014 Flevoland is a province of the Neth- der (Northeast polder). polders revealed many wrecks of Almere is a planned city and municipality in erlands. Located in the centre of the This new land included aircraft that had crashed into the the province of Flevoland, the Netherlands, country, at the location of the former the former islands of IJsselmeer bordering Lelystad and Zeewolde. The mu- Zuiderzee, the province was estab- Urk and Schokland and it was includ- during World nicipality of Almere comprises the districts lished on 1 January 1986; the twelfth ed in the province of Overijssel. After War II, and also Almere Stad, Almere Buiten, Almere Ooster- province of the country, with Lelystad this, other parts were reclaimed: the fossils of Pleis- wold (design phase) and Almere Pampus as its capital. The province has ap- South-eastern part in 1957 and the tocene mammals. (planned for future). and the boroughs of proximately 394,758 inhabitants South-western part in 1968. There Almere Haven, Almere Hout and Almere In February 2011, Flevoland, together Poort. (2011) and consists of 6 municipali- was an important change in these with the provinces of Utrecht and ties. post-war projects from the earlier Almere is the newest city in the Netherlands: North Holland, showed a desire to Noordoostpolder reclamation: a the first house was finished in 1976, and History investigate the feasibility of a merger narrow body of water was preserved Almere became a municipality in 1984. It is between the three provinces.
    [Show full text]
  • Storms in a Lagoon: Flooding History During the Last 1200 Years Derived from Geological and Historical Archives of Schokland (Noordoostpolder, the Netherlands)
    Netherlands Journal of Geosciences —– Geologie en Mijnbouw | 93 – 4 | 175-196 | 2014 doi: 10.1017/njg.2014.14 Storms in a lagoon: Flooding history during the last 1200 years derived from geological and historical archives of Schokland (Noordoostpolder, the Netherlands) D.F.A.M. van den Biggelaar1,*, S.J. Kluiving1,2,R.T.vanBalen3,4,C.Kasse3,S.R.Troelstra3 & M.A. Prins3 1 Institute for Geo- and Bioarchaeology, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands 2 Faculty of Arts, Department of Archaeology, Ancient History of Mediterranean Studies and Near Eastern Studies, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands 3 Cluster of Climate Change and Landscape Dynamics, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands 4TNO– Geological Survey of the Netherlands, Princetonlaan 6, 3584 CB Utrecht, the Netherlands * Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Manuscript received: 26 November 2013, accepted: 14 May 2014 Abstract Flevoland (central Netherlands) is an area of long-term discontinuous deposition that has been reclaimed from the Zuiderzee in the 20th century. Before the reclamation, the Zuiderzee had been in a phase of enlargement, threatening inhabitants on the islands and the shores, since the Medieval Period. During this phase, a surficial clay cover was deposited on the island of Schokland (World Heritage Site: Noordoostpolder, northern Flevoland). We have studied the clay sequence in order to reconstruct the island’s flooding history during the last 1200 years. The depositional history of the youn- gest clay deposit on Schokland is inferred from a literature study, analyses of a digital elevation model, six coring transects, three new 14C accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) dates and laboratory analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Centenary of the Zuiderzee Act: a Masterpiece of Engineering
    NEWS Centenary of the Zuiderzee Act: a Masterpiece of Engineering The Dutch Zuiderzee Act came into force exactly 100 years ago today, on 14 June 1918. The Zuiderzee Act signalled the beginning of the works that continue to protect the heart of The Netherlands from the dangers and vagaries of the Zuiderzee, an inlet of the North Sea, to this day. This amazing feat of engineering and spatial planning was a key milestone in The Netherlands’ world-leading reputation for reclaiming land from the sea. Wim van Wegen, content manager at ‘GIM International’, was born, raised and still lives in the Noordoostpolder, one of the various polders that were constructed. He has written an article about the uniqueness of this area of reclaimed land. I was born at the bottom of the sea. Want to fact-check this? Just compare a pre-1940s map of the Netherlands to a more contemporary one. The old map shows an inlet of the North Sea, the Zuiderzee. The new one reveals large parts of the Zuiderzee having been turned into land, actually no longer part of the North Sea. In 1932, a 32km-long dam (the Afsluitdijk) was completed, separating the former Zuiderzee and the North Sea. This part of the sea was turned into a lake, the IJsselmeer (also known as Lake IJssel or Lake Yssel in English). Why 'polder' is a Dutch word The idea behind the construction of the Afsluitdijk was to defend areas against flooding, caused by the force of the open sea. The dam is part of the Zuiderzee Works, a man-made system of dams and dikes, land reclamation and water drainage works.
    [Show full text]
  • Oosteliijk Flevoland En Kampen
    Oostelijk Flevoland en Kampen. Ontsta~n aan de mond van de Ijssel, in de grijze oudheid, waarschijnlijk als vissersplaats, dankt Kampen zijn grote op• bloei in de 13e en 14e eeuw vooral aan zijn handel, aan de scheepvaartverbindingen van deze oude Hanzestad over de Zuiderzee met de opkomende steden in de Hollanden en door het Vlie met het Noorden en Westen, de landen aan de Oost• zee en later geheel 'West-Europa. En toen .de IJ sse1monden verzandden, het Hanzeverbond taande, en scheepvaart en handel achteruit gingen, ook als qe• volg van de opkomst van het jongere Amsterdam als handels• stad, verschafte de Zuiderzee aan Kampen welvaart door het eeuwenlang aanslibben van de vruchtbare gronden van het Kampereiland, die werden ingepolderd en daarna eigendom van de stad bleven. Kampen bleef.. ondanks de nabijheid van de provinciale hoofdstad Zwolle en ondanks tijdelijke inzinkingen, een wel• varend culturee1 en economisch centrum met vele scholen, winkels, verzorgende bedrijven, stuwende industrieen en tal van culturele instellingen. Thans is een nieuw stadium in het contact tussen Kampen en de Zuiderzee aangebroken, een stadium met nieuwe ont• wikkclinqs- en welvaartsmoge1ijkheden. De Zuiderzeepolders. in de volgorde van totstandkoming genummerd aangegeven op kaart I, vormen voor Kampen een nieuw en groot achterland. Wat de Noordoostpolder betreft, is dit reeds gebleken: er hebben zich in Kampen nieuwe industrieen gevestigd, de Kamper winkels hebben de Noordoostpolderbevolkinq van allerlei artikelen moeten voorzien, de bevolking is toegenomen met tal van bewoners, die bij het werk in de polder betrokken zijn. Dit alles is geschied, niettegenstaande de polder een min of meer in zich zelf besloten geheel vormt en Emmeloord tot een groter polderstadje uitgroeide dan aanvankelijk was ver- wacht.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Favourable Circumstances. First of All, Like in Many Other Dutch Polders
    AN OUTLINE OF LATE SWIFTERBANT POTTERY IN THE NOORDOOSTPOLDER (PROVINCE OF FLEVOLAND, THE NETHERLANDS) AND THE CHRONOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE POTTERY OF THE SWIFTERBANT CULTURE D.C.M. RAEMAEKERS Groningen Institute of Archaeology, Groningen, the Netherlands ABSTRACT: The centuries after the levee occupation at Swifterbant (4300–4000 BC) and before the start of the TRB West group in the Netherlands around 3400/3300 BC are relatively sparse in terms of archaeological re- mains. This article presents the available ceramic evidence from the major assemblages. On the basis of this Late Swifterbant material schemes are presented on the chronological development and regional variation of the pottery of the Swifterbant culture. KEYWORDS: the Netherlands, Noordoostpolder, Middle Neolithic, Swifterbant, ceramics, 14C analysis. 1. INTRODUCTION In this article Late Swifterbant ceramics are presented. First of all, this is done to complete the overview of the Swifterbant culture I presented earlier (Raemaekers, 1999) and in which the late phase was inevitably un- derrepresented. The newly available data for the first time allow an overview of Late Swifterbant ceramics. The restricted information on other aspects of mate- rial culture, e.g. flint artefacts, hinders a synthesis on a more encompassing level. Second, the publica- tions of the sites presented here were internationally hardly (Schokkerhaven) or not at all available (Urk, Emmeloord). This publication aims to bring these sites to the fore. Third, on the basis of the ceramics from the three sites, there is a possibility to present new material to the debate on the transition to TRB. In more general terms, this concerns the positioning of the Late Swifterbant material in relation to other ceramic groups: the middle phase of the Swifterbant culture, earliest TRB and the Hazendonk 3 group.
    [Show full text]
  • Ex Post Evaluation Objective 1 1994-1999 Member State Report
    Ex post evaluation Objective 1 1994-1999 Member state report Netherlands Final report Client: European Commission, DG Regio ECORYS-NEI Regional & Urban Development Luc Boot Sacha Koppert Rotterdam, 24 June 2003 B/ib7212 ECORYS-NEI P.O. Box 4175 3006 AD Rotterdam K.P. van der Mandelelaan 11 3062 MB Rotterdam The Netherlands T +31 10 453 88 00 F +31 10 453 07 68 E [email protected] W www.ecorys.com Table of contents Executive Summary 7 1 Introduction 12 2 Methodology 13 3 Appropriateness of the strategy adopted 14 3.1 Introduction 14 3.2 Key issues in 1994 and their Evolution to 1999 14 3.3 Description of the SPD 18 3.4 Planned expenditure versus actual expenditure 22 3.5 Conclusions on appropriateness of the strategy 31 4 Effectiveness 36 4.1 Introduction 36 4.2 Programme outputs and results 36 4.3 Programme effects 40 4.4 Assessment of Community Added Value 55 4.5 Changes to policy and practice 59 5 Impact 60 5.1 Introduction 60 5.2 Achievement of the programme objectives 60 5.3 Impact assessment 65 6 Management and implementation systems 69 6.1 Institutional arrangements 69 6.2 Project selection process 74 6.3 Financial systems 76 6.4 Monitoring structures 77 6.5 Programme evaluations 78 6.6 Synergy effects 80 6.7 Equal opportunities and the environment 81 6.8 Conclusion 84 7 Strengths and weaknesses 86 7.1 Process issues 86 7.2 Achievements 87 7.3 Overall efficiency 88 8 Conclusions and recommendations 90 Executive Summary In the Netherlands there is only one Objective 1 region, Flevoland.
    [Show full text]
  • Pioneering Spatial Planning in the 1930S
    BLOG Pioneering Spatial Planning in the 1930s I was born at the bottom of the sea. Want to fact-check this? Just compare a pre-1940s map of the Netherlands to a more contemporary one. The old map shows an inlet of the North Sea, the Zuiderzee. The new one reveals large parts of the Zuiderzee having been turned into land, actually no longer part of the North Sea. In 1932, a 32km-long dam (the Afsluitdijk) was completed, separating the former Zuiderzee and the North Sea. This part of the sea was turned into a lake, the IJsselmeer (also known as Lake IJssel or Lake Yssel in English). The idea behind the construction of the Afsluitdijk was to defend areas against flooding, caused by the force of the open sea. The dam is part of the Zuiderzee Works, a man-made system of dams and dikes, land reclamation and water drainage works. But it was not only about protecting the Dutch against the threats of the sea; creating new agricultural land was another driving force behind this masterpiece. A third goal was to improve water management by creating a freshwater lake. 'Polder' is a Dutch word and this is no coincidence. There is an English saying: "God created the world but the Dutch created Holland". In 1930, the Wieringermeer was the first polder of the Zuiderzee Works that was drained, even before the construction of the Afsluitdijk was completed. The Noordoostpolder (North-East Polder) followed in 1942 and then in 1957 Eastern Flevoland and in 1968 Southern Flevoland. I was born in Emmeloord, the administrative centre of the Noordoostpolder, and grew up near a small village named Bant.
    [Show full text]
  • Luttelgeest 11,34 Km Emmeloord
    Etappeuitslag 12-dorpenloop AV NOP 14 april 2018 Uitslag van deze etappe. De tijd is de brutotijd Uitslag t/m deze etappe. De tijd is de som van de nettotijden. Emmeloord - Luttelgeest 11,34 km Emmeloord - Luttelgeest nr team Naam loper Tijd km/h nr team Teamnaam Tijd ∆ 1 1 Bas Hollegien 0:38:44 17,6 1 1 hardloopbegeleidingopmaat/klif18 0:38:44 0:00:00 2 8 Izak Hanse 0:41:09 16,5 2 7 KLIF18 0:40:22 0:01:38 3 5 Fred Reitsma 0:41:32 16,4 3 2 De Corner 0:40:24 0:01:40 4 3 Cees Snoek 0:43:09 15,8 4 8 ASV – Rutten 0:41:09 0:02:25 5 49 Bas Stevens 0:43:57 15,5 5 5 Van der Valk Runners 0:41:32 0:02:49 6 7 Jacolien Ruizendaal 0:44:51 v 15,2 6 3 The Quick Jewels 0:43:09 0:04:25 7 2 Dinie Ras 0:44:54 v 15,2 7 49 JCI Groot Schokland 0:43:57 0:05:13 8 15 Jeroen Woltinge 0:44:58 15,1 8 32 De Houthakker 0:44:18 0:05:34 9 17 Wietze van Wegen 0:45:20 15,0 9 20 Creil 0:44:37 0:05:53 10 36 Gerwin Struijs 0:45:28 15,0 10 11 KLIF18 ladies 0:44:40 0:05:56 11 18 Wilbert Ras 0:46:15 14,7 11 15 SoulsUnited 0:44:58 0:06:15 12 43 Teun Hunneman 0:46:21 14,7 12 17 Hardloopteam Bant 0:45:20 0:06:36 13 29 Rick Hellendoorn 0:46:27 14,6 13 36 BLUE RUNNERS 0:45:28 0:06:44 14 14 Bas Krens 0:46:34 14,6 14 18 West Wereld Wijd 0:46:15 0:07:31 15 19 Jacob Hoekstra 0:46:40 14,6 15 43 NAK 0:46:21 0:07:37 16 28 Marcel Dijk 0:47:34 14,3 16 29 t Voorhuys 0:46:27 0:07:43 17 21 Erwin Raggers 0:47:42 14,3 17 14 Team Gall&Gall Emmeloord 0:46:34 0:07:50 18 13 Bart Blok 0:47:55 14,2 18 19 VakNed Uitzendbureau 0:46:40 0:07:56 19 38 Arjan Vroegop 0:48:07 14,1 19 28 Zuyderzee Lyceum 0:47:34
    [Show full text]
  • Manifest Noordoostelijk Flevoland
    Manifest Noordoostelijk Flevoland Burgemeester en Wethouders van Dronten, Urk en Noordoostpolder Overwegende dat: • op 20 maart 2019 verkiezingen zijn gehouden voor de Provinciale Staten van Flevoland; • een nieuw College van Gedeputeerde Staten van Flevoland aantreedt; • een Collegeprogramma wordt ontwikkeld voor de periode 2019-2023; • de Provincie Flevoland een belangrijke rol heeft in het faciliteren van de in Flevoland gelegen gemeenten; • onze gemeenten samen 100.000+ inwoners huisvesten • onze gemeenten een voorname rol spelen als het gaat om agrofood, de maakindustrie en de maritieme sector • onze gemeenten actief deelnemen in de economische regio Zwolle, en derhalve een verbindende schakel zijn met dit netwerk besluiten samen op te trekken voor het behartigen van de gezamenlijke belangen en ambities en roepen het Provinciaal bestuur van Flevoland op, zich actief in te zetten en/of middelen beschikbaar te stellen voor: • de ruimtelijke en economische ontwikkeling van Noordoostelijk Flevoland in zijn algemeenheid o versterken recreatie en toerisme o versterken agrofood cluster o het behoud van vitale kernen • de bereikbaarheid over de weg van het gebied Noordoostelijk Flevoland, in casu: o De verbreding van de N50 (Overijssels deel) o De verbreding van de N307 en de aansluiting op de N50 o Een nieuwe rondweg om Urk vanaf de A6 • een hoogwaardiger rechtstreeks openbaar vervoersverbinding vanuit het landelijk gebied richting de belangrijke OV-knooppunten in de regio; • het realiseren van hoogwaardig openbaar vervoer naar het Noorden via Noord Flevoland met een station nabij Emmeloord. • het realiseren van een extra verbinding tussen Noord Flevoland en Oost-Flevoland naast de Ketelbrug • een verdieping en verbreding van de vaarverbinding tussen de Ketelbrug en de sluizen bij Kornwerderzand • het behoud van goede basiszorg en de snelle bereikbaarheid van acute zorg in de directe omgeving van onze gemeenten • een structurele (financiële) samenwerking met de Regio Zwolle, ter ondersteuning van onze gemeenten en gaan vervolgens over tot de orde van de dag.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Oriented Development: a Study Into the Relation Between Spatial Developments and Public Transport Use Case Study: Stedenbaanplus
    Transit Oriented Development: a study into the relation between spatial developments and public transport use Case study: StedenbaanPlus Final report MSc. Thesis project June 11, 2014 M.C.J. Schouwenaars, BSc Delft University of Technology Section of transport and planning Student Thesis professor Daily supervisor External supervisor 1 External supervisor 2 Thesis coordinator M.C.J. Schouwenaars, Prof. dr. ir. Dr.Ir. R. van Nes Dr. ir. J.H. Baggen Ir. M.W.J. Bus Ir. P.B.L. Wiggenraad BSc B. van Arem (Panteia) Transit Oriented Development: a study into the relation between spatial developments and public transport use Case study: StedenbaanPlus Final report MSc. thesis project M.C.J. Schouwenaars, BSc 1304208 marc.schouwenaars.1988 –at– gmail.com Delft University of Technology Civil Engineering, master track Transport and Planning Committee: Prof. dr. ir. Bart van Arem Chairman Delft University of Technology Faculty of Civil Engineering Section of transport and planning Dr. ir. Rob van Nes Daily supervisor Delft University of Technology Faculty of Civil Engineering Section of transport and planning Dr. ir. John Baggen External member TU Delft Delft University of Technology Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management Section of Engineering Systems and Services Ir. Marcel Bus External member Panteia Panteia Zoetermeer (NEA) Ir. Paul Wiggenraad Graduation coordinator Delft University of Technology Faculty of Civil Engineering Section of transport and planning Delft, 11th of June 2014 Final report MSc. thesis M.C.J. Schouwenaars, BSc PREFACE This thesis is presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MSc. in Civil Engineering, track Transport & Planning, and has been completed at the Delft University of Technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Op De Kuierlatten
    Landschapsbeheer Flevoland op de kuierlatten Rondje Tollebeek 4,8 km Bij het struinen rondom Tollebeek, het jongste dorp van de Noordoostpolder, maakt u kennis met de in- teressante poldergeschiedenis, die in en om het dorp en in de omgeving zijn te zien. Rondje Tollebeek biedt veel landschappelijke afwis- seling: zicht op het dorp, geschiedenis, landbouw, onderbemalingsgebied met de Urkervaart en de tochten, natuurvriendelijke oevers, veel flora en fauna, vergezichten met begroeide akkers en andere landschappelijke elementen. 1 Rondje Tollebeek Op de parkeerplaats in Tollebeek, op de muur van de ‘Goede Aanloop’ hangt het informatiebord over het pad. Ter plaatse kunt u de route met alle informatie nog downloaden via opdekuierlatten.nl Het startpunt is ook te bereiken met Connexion Urk-Zwolle v.v, halte 141. Op de parkeerplaats is een supermarkt en een cafetaria. GPS 52°40’38.0”N 5°40’45.9”E Werkt via google maps op Android; Iphone gebruikers moeten apart google maps installeren via de app store. Landschapsbeheer Flevoland Botter 1403, 8232 JP Lelystad Telefoon 0320 294939 www.landschapsbeheerflevoland.nl 2 Kaart 7 9 8 6 5 4 3 1 2 3 Rondje Tollebeek Start GPS 52°40’38.0”N 5°40’45.9”E Bij het startpunt is ruime parkeergelegenheid. De route wordt aangegeven met de bordjes met de voetstappen. Vanaf de start loop je richting de Urkervaart/loswal, waar je rechtsaf Rondje Tollebeek volgt. kaart Rondje Tollebeek Rondje Tollebeek is een afwisselende wandelroute rondom Tollebeek, 8 het laagste en jongste dorp van de Noordoostpolder. De wandeling Legenda wandelroute 9 akker voert door verschillende landschappen en biedt allerlei interessante 7 bebouwing bos informatie over dit deel van de NOP, zoals de geschiedenis, de land- water bouw, flora en fauna en het onderbemalingsgebied met de Urkervaart lay-out ruitervorm.nl 10 en de tochten.
    [Show full text]
  • Visie Connexxion Op Het Busnet Bij Realisatie Van De Rijngouwelijn
    Visie Connexxion op het busnet bij realisatie van de RijnGouwelijn 5 1 4 4 5 2 1 3 1 39 15 4 1 15 2 3 4 1 1 4 4 4 1 1 4 3 1 4 2 3 4 Hilversum, januari 2007 - 2 - I N H O U D Pagina 1 Inleiding...............................................................................................5 2 Uitgangspunt en visie op hoofdlijnen....................................................6 3 Fase 0 bouwfase....................................................................................7 4 Fase 1 RijnGouwelijn oost gereed........................................................15 5 Fase 2 RijnGouwelijn west gereed.......................................................22 Kaarten 4.1 Aangepast busnet fase 1 streek .........................................................17 4.2 Aangepast busnet fase 1 Leidse agglomeratie....................................20 5.1 Aangepast busnet fase 2 Leiden – Katwijk – Noordwijk ...................23 - 3 - - 4 - 1 Inleiding In ontwikkeling is de planvoorbereiding voor de RijnGouwelijn, een light-rail verbinding (sneltram) Gouda – Alphen aan den Rijn – Leiden – Katwijk/Noordwijk. De 1e fase van dit project betreft het deel Gouda – Leiden transferium ’t Schouw/A44 (RijnGouwelijn Oost) en de 2e fase betreft het deel Leiden transferium – Katwijk/Noordwijk (RijnGouwelijn West). Connexxion is concessiehouder van de concessie van het stads- en streekvervoer in de Duin- en Bollenstreek, Leidse regio, Rijnstreek en Midden-Holland. Deze concessie heeft een looptijd tot 1 januari 2011, met een mogelijke verlenging tot 1 januari
    [Show full text]