MEN WHO MATCHED the MOUNTAINS: the Forest Service In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MEN WHO MATCHED the MOUNTAINS: the Forest Service In MEN WHO MATCHED THE MOUNTAINS: The Forest Service in the Southwest By Edwin A. Tucker and George Fitzpatrick 1972 United States Department of Agriculture U.S. Forest Service Southwestern Region TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface Chapter I. The Pioneers Chapter II. Men on Horseback Chapter III. Cattle, Sheep and People Chapter IV. New Rangers Chapter V. Fire! Chapter VI. Wild Times and Wild Horses Chapter VII. What the Well Dressed Ranger Should Wear Chapter VIII. Six-Guns and Sons o' Guns Chapter IX. Grazing Problems Chapter X. Reconnaissance Chapter XI. Timbe-r-r-r! Chapter XII. No Lady Rangers—But Lots of Paper Work Chapter XIII. From Horses to Horseless Carriages Chapter XIV. CCC Days Chapter XV. Ranger Humor Chapter XVI. Grasslands Chapter XVII. The National Forests of Arizona Chapter XVIII. The National Forests in New Mexico Chapter XIV. Lost Mines and Buried Treasure Chapter XX. Ah Wilderness! Chapter XXI. Recreation Chapter XXII. Multiple Use Chapter XXIII. Land Exchanges Chapter XXIV. Management Chapter XXV. Public Relations Chapter XXVI. The Modern Ranger Chapter XXVII. Land Grant Country PREFACE It would be presumptuous to call this a history of the Forest Service in the Southwest, for no single volume can tell the whole story. Better to call it a chronicle "of and by a few of the men who quite literally blazed the trail, and of the fulfillment, frustration, and fun they found along the way," as Edwin A. Tucker phrased it. Several years ago Fred H. Kennedy, then Regional Forester, authorized Tucker to undertake twin historical projects: a history of Region 3 and the establishment of the Forest Service Museum at the Continental Divide Training Center. Both assignments were accomplished. For nearly a year, Tucker tape recorded interviews with early-day Rangers and other officials, some retired, some still in harness. And from newspapers and official sources he gleaned news items, letters and reports concerning early activities and people. When the material was typed, it covered more than 1500 typewritten pages—four big volumes—far too bulky a manuscript for publication as a trade book. This book then is a distillation of that material, plus such other material and chapters that were needed to clarify and bring up to date the story of some of the people of the Forest Service in the Southwest. Tucker has spent his adult life in the Forest Service, beginning during the period when many pioneer conditions still prevailed in the Southwest, and he knew and worked with many of the old timers and of course with the new breed of professionals who now guide the destiny of the Service. "However spectacular the changes in the Service," Tucker wrote in a foreword to his interviews, "they were nevertheless possible only because of the kind of men involved, men who responded to the challenge of their particular environment and time. In the earliest days, for example, the men for the times were necessarily tough; they had to be to survive. At that stage, ruggedness and resourcefulness, not technology, were the requisites. Despite public apathy and users' antagonism to regulations (sometimes violent), in the face of political pressures, in the absence of guidelines and for the most part with little formal education, the earliest Rangers and Supervisors did the job that was needful at the time. They performed their work with exceptional devotion and loyalty, and with a surprising awareness of the problem of that era and their relation to the future." Regrettably, all of the interesting experiences and histories of the early-day Rangers could not be included. Insofar as possible, the material chosen for inclusion is representative of various Ranger Districts, happenings and people. Tucker compiled material that reflected not only the spirit of the times, but also the special "flavor" that was a quality of the individual involved. Every effort has been made to retain that special flavor in the historical chapters. The current operations of the Forest Service are explained briefly so that the general reader may have an overall picture of the Forest Service, not only of its beginnings and growth but its complex management operations today. Much of the material deals with Rangers as the focal point of the narrative—but in a sense all of the employees of the Forest Service are "Rangers." A remarkable circumstance of research for this volume was the discovery of the high degree of dedication of Forest Service people— whether the title is Ranger, fire guard, clerk, Supervisor, or Chief of a Division. They are wedded to their jobs and dedicated to the philosophies of the Forest Service even when they differ personally as to the best ways to carry out the policies of the agency. The Forest Service is a complex organization of many kinds of specialists, but the Ranger District is the principal component, and as one Supervisor put it, "the Ranger is the key to success of the Forest Service." Today's Ranger differs from his counterpart of forty, fifty, and sixty years ago in that he is better educated in the technology of his job, and he is more of a business executive, with trained specialists to help him accomplish the job. But he is still an outdoorsman. Though he has less opportunity to do so, he can still ride a horse—and in the Ranger Districts of the Southwestern Region, horses are still plentiful. But the Ranger also calls on modern technology when needed, whether it be planes, helicopters, electronics, or computers, or all of them. And like his predecessor who rode tall in the saddle, today's Ranger is still a man who matches the mountains. —George Fitzpatrick Gifford Pinchot was the first Chief of the Forest Service which was organized in 1905. Pinchot and President Theodore Roosevelt worked together in setting up the National Forest System as it exists today. The Pioneers "A ranger of any grade must be thoroughly sound and able-bodied, capable of enduring hardships and of performing severe labor under trying conditions. He must be able to take care of himself and his horses in regions remote from settlement and supplies." Forest Service Use Book, 1908. The man who sat at the roll top desk bulked large above the chair back. The black coat stretched tight in accordion pleats between his shoulders as he hunched over the desk. His shaggy black hair almost covered his stand-up white collar that peeked above the coat. And when he swung his chair around and stood up at the sound of a knock on his opened door, his over-developed paunch pushed a slight spread between his vest and trousers. "I'm headin' back for Pecos, Mr. McClure," the man at the door said. McClure took a half-smoked cigar from his mouth that was almost hidden by a heavy mustache. "Good," he said. "Good. And remember Fletcher, keep those reports concise . concise. Good- bye." McClure gave the tails of his Prince Albert a swish, sat down and swung back to his desk to resume his writing. This was the office of the Pecos River Forest Reserve in Santa Fe in 1900 and McClure was the new Forest Supervisor, in charge of three Rangers and an area that originally covered 300,000 acres of mountain forests, and including some of the highest peaks in New Mexico. R. C. McClure was hardly the physical type that anyone would picture—even in 1900—as a Forest Ranger. But in those early days of the Service, when it was still part of the General Land Office of the U. S. Department of the Interior, and before Civil Service covered the appointment of Rangers, McClure was one of many political appointees who launched the infant agency. The Pecos River Forest Reserve had been set aside by proclamation of President Benjamin Harrision in January, 1892, the very first one in the Southwest and the fourth Forest Reserve in the United States. Subsequent Presidential Proclamations established Forest Reserves that later were organized into District 3—now known as Region 3 of the United States Forest Service.* *Originally included National Forests in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Florida, and Puerto Rico. These were transferred in 1911 and 1913, and Region 3 now comprises only the National Forests in Arizona and New Mexico and National Grasslands in New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas. Gifford Pinchot, the idealistic conservationist who became the Chief Forester of the Department of Agriculture in 1898, had the right idea in his crusade to get "forestry from the books in to the woods." But it took awhile before there were trained Foresters to tackle the tasks—and in the meantime job-seekers who were sponsored by senators or other potent political allies moved into supervisory positions in the General Land Office's Forest Reserves Division. McClure's employment as Forest Supervisor had been made possible by Congressional appropriation in 1898, which provided for appointment of Forest Superintendents, Forest Supervisors, and Rangers for the Forest Reserves. A resident of Kentucky, he had obtained appointment through political channels, even as had his boss, I. B. Hanna, Superintendent of Forest Reserves in the Southwest, who was from Illinois and a close friend of "Uncle Joe" Cannon, then chairman of the powerful House Appropriations Committee. There had been two previous Superintendents for the Southwestern Region, (John D. Benedict, 1897-1899 and William B. Buntain, 1899-1900) but the new program of forest protection was slow in getting under way. McClure's earliest reports and letters reveal that despite his lack of technical training, he was an enthusiastic and industrious supervisor, who was much concerned with seeing that the several Rangers of the Pecos Reserve put in a full day of work every day.
Recommended publications
  • The AILING GILA WILDERNESS
    The AILING GILA WILDERNESS­ A PICTORIAL REVIEW The AILING GILA WILDERNESS A PICTORIAL REVIEW ~ Gila Wilderness by RONALD J. WHITE Division Director M.S. Wildlife Science, B.S. Range Science Certified Wildlife Biologist Division of Agricultural Programs and Resources New Mexico Department of Agriculture December 1995 ACknoWledgments Many people who live in the vicinity of the Gila National Forest are concerned about the degraded condition of its resources. This document resulted from my discussions with some of them, and the conclusion that something must be started to address the complex situation. Appreciation is extended to the participants in this project, who chose to get involved, and whose assistance and knowledge contributed significantly to the project. Their knowledge ofthe country, keen observations, and perceptive interpretations of the situation are unsurpassed. As a bonus, they are a pleasure to be around. Kit Laney - President, Gila Permittee's Association, and lifetime area rancher, Diamond Bar Cattle Co. Matt Schneberger - Vice President, Gila Permittee's Association, and lifetime area rancher, Rafter Spear Ranch. Becky Campbell Snow and David Snow - Gila Hot Springs Ranch. Becky is a lifetime area guide and outfitter. The Snows provided the livestock and equipment for both trips to review and photograph the Glenn Allotment in the Gila Wilderness. Wray Schildknecht - ArrowSun Associates, B.S. Wildlife Science, Reserve, NM. D. A. "Doc" and Ida Campbell, Gila Hot Springs Ranch, provided the precipitation data. They have served as volunteer weather reporters for the National Weather Service Forecast Office since 1957, and they are longtime area ranchers, guides, and outfitters. Their gracious hospitality at headquarters was appreciated by everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiricahua Leopard Frog (Rana Chiricahuensis)
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Chiricahua Leopard Frog (Rana chiricahuensis) Final Recovery Plan April 2007 CHIRICAHUA LEOPARD FROG (Rana chiricahuensis) RECOVERY PLAN Southwest Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, New Mexico DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and are sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, state agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director, or Director, as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature citation of this document should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007. Chiricahua Leopard Frog (Rana chiricahuensis) Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southwest Region, Albuquerque, NM. 149 pp. + Appendices A-M. Additional copies may be obtained from: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Arizona Ecological Services Field Office Southwest Region 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 500 Gold Avenue, S.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Fires in Ohio 1923 to 1935
    BULLETIN 598 DECEMBER, 1938 Forest Fires in Ohio 1923 to 1935 Bernard E. Leete OHIO AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Wooster, Ohio CONTENTS Introduction . 3 Area, Population, and Topographical Features of the Forest Fire District . 5 Organization of the Ohio Fire District . 8 Number of Fires . 12 Area Burned . 17 Damage .............................................................. 20 Cost of Suppression . 25 Statistics by Ten-Day Periods ........................................• 30 Causes of Fires . 88 Classification of Fires by Size . 53 (1) The first forest fire lookout tower in Ohio was built on Copperhead Hill, Shawnee State Forest, in 1924 FOREST FIRES IN OHIO 1923 TO 1935 BERNARD E. LEETE INTRODUCTION Fires in the hardwood forests of southern Ohio are similar in a general way as to behavior and effect to those of Pennsylvania, Maryland, West Virginia, Kentucky, and other eastern hardwood states. Ohio fires practically .neve:t< "crown"; they creep or run along the ground; they are seldom spectacu­ lar; they have to date taken no toll in human life; they do not wipe out villages and towns in their path; and they may be controlled, if taken in time, with relative ease. Because of the enormous sprouting capacity of most of the native hardwood species and the luxuriant growth of sprouts, shrubs, and vines following a fire, the damage that has been done by an Ohio fire is frequently Qbscured from untrained eyes. The fires naturally vary greatly in intensity according to the weather conditions, the quantity and kinds of fuel present, the IJoint of origin with reference to the surrounding topography, and other such factors. The damage runs all the way from none at all to a total killing of the stand.
    [Show full text]
  • Gila National Forest Fact Sheet
    CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Because life is good. GILA NATIONAL FOREST The Gila National Forest occupies 3.3 million acres in southwestern New Mexico and is home to the Mexican spotted owl, Mexican gray wolf, Gila chub, southwestern willow flycatcher, loach minnow, and spikedace. The forest also encompasses the San Francisco, Gila, and Mimbres Rivers, and the scenic Burros Mountains. In the 1920s, conservation pioneer Aldo Leopold persuaded the Forest Service to set aside more than half a million acres of the Gila River’s headwaters as wilderness. This wild land became the nation’s first designated wilderness Photo © Robin Silver — the Gila Wilderness Area — in 1924. The Gila National Forest is home to threatened Mexican spotted owls and many other imperiled species. n establishing the Gila Wilderness Area, the Gila The Gila National Forest’s plan by the numbers: National Forest set a precedent for protection Iof our public lands. Sadly, it appears that • 114,000: number of acres of land open to safeguarding the Gila for the enjoyment of future continued destruction; generations is no longer management’s top priority. • 4,764: number of miles of proposed motorized On September 11, 2009, the Gila National Forest roads and trails in the Gila National Forest, equal to released its travel-management plan, one of the worst the distance from Hawaii to the North Pole; plans developed for southwestern forests. Pressure • $7 million: road maintenance backlog accumulated from vocal off-road vehicle users has overwhelmed the by the Gila National Forest; Forest Service, which has lost sight of its duty to protect • less than 3 percent: proportion of forest visitors this land for future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • LIGHTNING FIRES in SOUTHWESTERN FORESTS T
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. LIGHTNING FIRES IN SOUTHWESTERN FORESTS t . I I LIGHT~ING FIRES IN SOUTHWESTERN FORESTS (l) by Jack S. Barrows Department of Forest and Wood Sciences College of Forestry and Natural Resources Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 (1) Research performed for Northern Forest Fire Laboratory, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station under cooperative agreement 16-568 CA with Rocky Mountain For­ est and Range Experiment Station. Final Report May 1978 n LIB RARY COPY. ROCKY MT. FO i-< t:S'f :.. R.l.N~ EX?f.lt!M SN T ST.A.1101'1 . - ... Acknowledgementd r This research of lightning fires in Sop thwestern forests has been ? erformed with the assistan~e and cooperation of many individuals and agencies. The idea for the research was suggested by Dr. Donald M. Fuquay and Robert G. Baughman of the Northern Forest Fire Laboratory. The Fire Management Staff of U. S. Forest Service Region Three provided fire data, maps, rep~rts and briefings on fire p~enomena. Special thanks are expressed to James F. Mann for his continuing assistance in these a ctivities. Several members of national forest staffs assisted in correcting fire report errors. At CSU Joel Hart was the principal graduate 'research assistant in organizing the data, writing computer programs and handling the extensive computer operations. The initial checking of fire data tapes and com­ puter programming was performed by research technician Russell Lewis. Graduate Research Assistant Rick Yancik and Research Associate Lee Bal- ::.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 3 City of Palo Alto
    Santa Clara County Community Wildfire Protection Plan Annex 3 – City of Palo Alto ANNEX 3 CITY OF PALO ALTO Palo Alto is located in the northwest corner of Santa Clara County and shares it border with East Palo Alto, Mountain View, Los Altos Hills, Stanford, Portola Valley and Menlo Park (Figure 3.1). As of the 2010 Census, the city total resident population was 64,403 with a population density of 2,497.5 people per square mile. ORGANIZATION AND JURISDICTION Fire management for the City of Palo Alto is provided by the Palo Alto Fire Department. The City of Palo Alto developed a Foothills Fire Management Plan (FFMP) in 1982 that provides the planning framework for fire control activities for the City and the Palo Alto Foothills Area which comprises the predominant wildland urban interface (WUI) area for the community. The FFMP goal is “to reduce government costs and citizen losses from wildland fire by increasing initial attack success and/or protecting assets at risk through focused pre-fire management activities.” The 2009 update addresses changes to the fire hazard assessment, review regional evacuation routes, review municipal ordinances, staffing of Station 8 (Foothills Fire Station), provide wildland fire management recommendations and mitigations, incorporate updates to open space plans, implement CEQA documentation, and create an implementation plan. In 2012 the city entered into a multi-year agreement with the Santa Clara FireSafe Council to facilitate the implementation of the FFMP and to provide additional community education and outreach to the residents of the WUI area within the city. Another update is being prepared; the areas recommended for treatment are incorporated into this Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) and will appear on the City website.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Ecology of Mexican Spotted Owls in the Upper Gila Mountains Recovery Unit, Arizona and New Mexico
    Status and Ecology of Mexican Spotted Owls in the Upper Gila Mountains Recovery Unit, Arizona and New Mexico Joseph L. Ganey James P. Ward, Jr. David W. Willey United States Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Report Department Service Research Station RMRS-GTR-256WWW of Agriculture May 2011 Ganey, Joseph L.; Ward, James P. Jr.; Willey, David W. 2011. Status and ecology of Mexican spotted owls in the Upper Gila Mountains recovery unit, Arizona and New Mexico. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-256WWW. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 94 p. Abstract This report summarizes current knowledge on the status and ecology of the Mexican spot- ted owl within the Upper Gila Mountains Recovery Unit (UGM RU). It was written at the request of U.S. Forest Service personnel involved in the Four Forests Restoration Initia- tive (4FRI), a collaborative, landscape-scale restoration effort covering approximately 2.4 million ac (1 million ha) across all or part of four National Forests (Apache-Sitgreaves, Coconino, Kaibab, and Tonto National Forests) located within the UGM RU. The UGM RU supports >50% of the known population of Mexican spotted owls, and the central location of the UGM RU within the overall range of the owl appears to facilitate gene flow throughout that range. Consequently, the UGM population is viewed as important to stability within the overall range of the owl, and management that impacts owls within the UGM RU could affect owl populations beyond that RU. Keywords: abundance, demography, habitat selection, diet composition, movements Authors Joseph L.
    [Show full text]
  • LOOKOUT NETWORK (ISSN 2154-4417), Is Published Quarterly by the Forest Fire Lookout Association, Inc., Keith Argow, Publisher, 374 Maple Nielsen
    VOL. 26 NO. 4 WINTER 2015-2016 LLOOKOOKOUTOUT NETWNETWORKORK THE QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF THE FOREST FIRE LOOKOUT ASSOCIATION, INC. · 2016 Western Conference - June 10-12, John Day, Oregon · FFLA Loses Founding Member - Henry Isenberg · Northeast Conference - September 17-18, New York www.firelookout.org ON THE LOOKOUT From the National Chairman Keith A. Argow Vienna, Virginia Winter 2015-2016 FIRE TOWERS IN THE HEART OF DIXIE On Saturday, January 16 we convened the 26th annual member of the Alabama Forestry Commission who had meeting of the Forest Fire Lookout Association at the Talladega purchased and moved a fire tower to his woodlands; the project Ranger Station, on the Talladega National Forest in Talladega, leader of the Smith Mountain fire tower restoration; the publisher Alabama (guess that is somewhere near Talladega!). Our host, of a travel magazine that promoted the restoration; a retired District Ranger Gloria Nielsen, and Alabama National Forests district forester with the Alabama Forestry Commission; a U.S. Assistant Archaeologist Marcus Ridley presented a fine Forest Service District Ranger (our host), and a zone program including a review of the multi-year Horn Mountain archaeologist for the Forest Service. Add just two more Lookout restoration. A request by the radio communications members and we will have the makings of a potentially very people to construct a new effective chapter in Alabama. communications tower next to The rest of afternoon was spent with an inspection of the the lookout occasioned a continuing Horn Mountain Lookout restoration project, plus visits review on its impact on the 100-foot Horn Mountain Fire Tower, an historic landmark visible for many miles.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln National Forest
    Chapter 1: Introduction In Ecological and Biological Diversity of National Forests in Region 3 Bruce Vander Lee, Ruth Smith, and Joanna Bate The Nature Conservancy EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We summarized existing regional-scale biological and ecological assessment information from Arizona and New Mexico for use in the development of Forest Plans for the eleven National Forests in USDA Forest Service Region 3 (Region 3). Under the current Planning Rule, Forest Plans are to be strategic documents focusing on ecological, economic, and social sustainability. In addition, Region 3 has identified restoration of the functionality of fire-adapted systems as a central priority to address forest health issues. Assessments were selected for inclusion in this report based on (1) relevance to Forest Planning needs with emphasis on the need to address ecosystem diversity and ecological sustainability, (2) suitability to address restoration of Region 3’s major vegetation systems, and (3) suitability to address ecological conditions at regional scales. We identified five assessments that addressed the distribution and current condition of ecological and biological diversity within Region 3. We summarized each of these assessments to highlight important ecological resources that exist on National Forests in Arizona and New Mexico: • Extent and distribution of potential natural vegetation types in Arizona and New Mexico • Distribution and condition of low-elevation grasslands in Arizona • Distribution of stream reaches with native fish occurrences in Arizona • Species richness and conservation status attributes for all species on National Forests in Arizona and New Mexico • Identification of priority areas for biodiversity conservation from Ecoregional Assessments from Arizona and New Mexico Analyses of available assessments were completed across all management jurisdictions for Arizona and New Mexico, providing a regional context to illustrate the biological and ecological importance of National Forests in Region 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded and Reviewed on the State Parks’ Webpage Or Those Interested Could Request a Hard Copy
    Governor of Arizona Janet Napolitano Arizona State Parks Board William Cordasco, Chair ting 50 ting 50 ra Y Arlan Colton ra Y b e b e a William C. Porter a le le r r e e s s William C. Scalzo C C Tracey Westerhausen Mark Winkleman 1957 - 2007 Reese Woodling 1957 - 2007 Elizabeth Stewart (2006) Arizona Outdoor Recreation Coordinating Commission Jeffrey Bell, Chair Mary Ellen Bittorf Garry Hays Rafael Payan William Schwind Duane Shroufe Kenneth E. Travous This publication was prepared under the authority of the Arizona State Parks Board. Prepared by the Statewide Planning Unit Resources Management Section Arizona State Parks 1300 West Washington Street Phoenix, Arizona 85007 (602) 542-4174 Fax: (602) 542-4180 www.azstateparks.com The preparation of this report was under the guidance from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, under the provisions of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (Public Law 88-578, as amended). The Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, religion, national origin, age or disability. For additional information or to file a discrimination complaint, contact Director, Office of Equal Opportunity, Department of the Interior, Washington D.C. 20240. September 2007 ARIZONA 2008 SCORP ARIZONA 2008 Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) Arizona State Parks September 2007 iii ARIZONA 2008 SCORP ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The 2008 Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) for Arizona was prepared by the Planning Unit, Resources Management
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Terms Used in Forest Fire Control
    / /7f^/)-L ^'c\ /û/ Glossary of Terms used in Forest Fire Control Agriculture Hanähcx^ "Hß. 104 Forest Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREWORD Standard definitions are needed for special terms peculiar to any profession, art, or science. Uniform terminology is essential for comprehensive interchange of ideas between workers either by word of mouth or by writing. New terms and concepts have been introduced in fire control in the United States since 1939, when the second edition of "Glossary of Terms Used in Fire Control" was published. More concise meanings have furthermore developed for some old and accepted terms, whereas other terms have become obsolete. About 100 new definitions have been added and about 200 former definitions have been revised in wording or meaning. This third edition of the glossary is intended primarily for those engaged in fire control and for the forest school student. Only those special terms and definitions likely to be needed by forest school students and fire control workers have been included. Teims related to special fields of fire control and related sciences that concern relatively few students or workers have been excluded if definitions are available in glossaries or handbooks pertaining to those fields. Fire-weather forecast terms, omitted here, are given in "Fire Weather Forecast Terminology'' published by the U. S. Weather Bureau. Some additional aerial transportation, cargo, and reconnaissance terms are given in "Air Operations Handbook'' published by the U. S. Forest Service. Terms used in only one region have usually been omitted. Since by défini' tion, a glossary explains terms that have a technical meaning not clearly implied by the usual sense of the words, words used in the dictionary sense and terms that are self-explanatory have been largely excluded.
    [Show full text]
  • Crowning the Queen of the Sonoran Desert: Tucson and Saguaro National Park
    Crowning the Queen of the Sonoran Desert: Tucson and Saguaro National Park An Administrative History Marcus Burtner University of Arizona 2011 Figure 1. Copper Pamphlet produced by Tucson Chamber of Commerce, SAGU257, Box 1, Folder 11, WACC. “In a canon near the deserted mission of Cocospera, Cereus giganteus was first met with. The first specimen brought the whole party to a halt. Standing alone upon a rocky projection, it rose in a single unbranched column to the height of some thirty feet, and formed a sight which seemed almost worth the journey to behold. Advancing into the canon, specimens became more numerous, until at length the whole vegetation was, in places, made up of this and other Cacaceae. Description can convey no adequate idea of this singular vegetation, at once so grand and dreary. The Opuntia arborescens and Cereus Thurberi, which had before been regarded with wonder, now seemed insignificant in comparison with the giant Cactus which towered far above.” George Thurber, 1855, Boundary Commission Report.1 Table of Contents 1 Asa Gray, ―Plantae Novae Thurberianae: The Characters of Some New Genera and Species of Plants in a Collection Made by George Thurber, Esq., of the Late Mexican Boundary ii List of Illustrations v List of Maps ix Introduction Crowning the Queen of the Desert 1 The Question of Social Value and Intrinsically Valuable Landscapes Two Districts with a Shared History Chapter 1 Uncertain Pathways to a Saguaro National Monument, 1912-1933 9 Saguaros and the Sonoran Desert A Forest of Saguaros Discovering
    [Show full text]