DOCSLIB.ORG

Moving Cities: the Future of Urban Travel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

a Moving Cities: The future of urban travel Edited by: Glaister & Box December 2014 b The Royal Automobile Club Foundation for Motoring Ltd is a transport policy and research organisation which explores the economic, mobility, safety and environmental issues relating to roads and their users. The Foundation publishes independent and authoritative research with which it promotes informed debate and advocates policy in the interest of the responsible motorist. RAC Foundation 89–91 Pall Mall London SW1Y 5HS Tel no: 020 7747 3445 www.racfoundation.org Registered Charity No. 1002705 December 2014 © Copyright Royal Automobile Club Foundation for Motoring Ltd c Moving Cities: The future of urban travel Edited by: Glaister & Box December 2014 i About the authors David Bayliss David Bayliss is a chartered engineer and town planner. He started his career with Manchester Corporation and then moved to the Greater London Council where he became Chief Transport Planner. Subsequently, as Director of Planning for London Transport, he was involved in planning the Docklands Light Railway, the Jubilee Line Extension and Croydon Tramlink. On retirement from London Transport in 1999 he was a director of Halcrow Consulting for the following ten years. During his career he been involved in almost all aspects of domestic transport and has been an advisor to a number of international organisations and overseas governments. He has written and lectured widely and is currently a trustee of the Rees Jeffreys Road Fund and of the RAC Foundation. John Dales, Urban Movement John is Director of Urban Movement, a consultancy specialising in transport planning and the design of urban streets and spaces. With an MSc in Transport from Imperial College/University College London, he began life as a transport professional in 1984, working first as a traffic engineer for JMP Consultants, and next for the London Borough of Newham. He joined urban design consultancy Urban Initiatives in 1996, and established Urban Movement at the start of 2010. His work over the past decade has focused on two related fields of endeavour: the access and movement aspects of complex urban development projects; and the detailed design of multi-functional, accessible and safe streets and spaces in urban centres and around stations. John is a streets design advisor to several UK local authorities, a trustee of Living Streets, and author of the monthly ‘Street Talk’ column in Local Transport Today. Garrett Emmerson, Transport for London Garrett Emmerson is Chief Operating Officer for Surface Transport, at Transport for London. He is responsible for the operation of the capital’s major road network; traffic signals across London; congestion charging and traffic enforcement and the operation of the Surface Transport and Traffic Control Centre. Garrett is also responsible for surface transport infrastructure asset management and implementation of TfL’s £4bn road investment programme, as well as modal service operations including: Barclays Cycle Hire; taxi and private hire regulation; river and coach services and London Dial-a-Ride. ii Garrett was previously TfL’s Director of Strategy and, before that, a director of transport consultancy Steer Davies Gleave. He is a former Head of Buckinghamshire County Council’s Transportation Service and a former Member of the Government Commission for Integrated Transport. He is currently member of the Government’s Motorists’ Forum advisory body on national roads policy. Ford Ford Motor Company, a global automotive industry leader based in Dearborn, Michigan in the United States, manufactures and distributes automobiles across six continents. With around 166,000 employees and 77 office and plant locations around the world, Ford Motor Company is focused on creating a strong business that builds great products that contribute to a better world. The company also provides financial services through Ford Motor Credit Company. Dale Harrow, Royal College of Art Professor Dale Harrow is dean of the School of Design and head of its Vehicle Design programme, a global centre of excellence in automotive design education. With a near 100 per cent record in student transition to professional practice, Vehicle Design was shortlisted for the Queen’s Award for Excellence in Education. Harrow is an international opinion former, commentator and media persona on design and the automotive industry. He is an award-winning designer, academic leader and researcher. Always keen to raise the intellectual debate about vehicle design, Harrow has lectured internationally on the subject. John Miles, Cambridge University John Miles is a fellow of Emmanuel College, Cambridge and is Chair of the Automotive Council’s Working Group on Intelligent Mobility. Formerly a Main Board Director at Arup Group, he took up his role at Cambridge University in January 2012 with the intention of exploring affordable, low carbon, energy technologies and business models. Since his appointment at Cambridge, John has been particularly active in the field of low carbon transport. He has been a prime contributor to the Mitsui- Arup electric bus fleet demonstration programme in Milton Keynes, in which the UK’s first demonstration of a bus service using wireless charging has been launched. He is also Programme Architect for LUTZ (low carbon urban transport zone), an industry / local authority collaboration programme which has been set-up to explore the potential for using Low-Speed Autonomous iii Transport Systems (L-SATS) for city-centre public transport. In his wider role as Chair of the Automotive Council’s Intelligent Mobility Working Group, John has been active in working with BIS and DfT over the past few years to secure recognition for the UK as a world leader in the design and development of intelligent systems for transport. Philip Pank Philip Pank is an award-winning writer, journalist and commentator in the fields of transport, international affairs and business. He was Transport Correspondent and Assistant Foreign Editor for The Times newspaper and previously worked for The Guardian and Agence France-Presse news agency. He received the ‘best media campaign of the year’ award at the National Transport Awards 2012 for his work on the Cities fit for cycling newspaper campaign. Timothy Papandreou, San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Timothy is a recognized expert, change agent and leader with over 18 years of experience in transportation and land-use planning, design, project management and operations in the U.S. and Australia. He is currently the Director of Strategic Planning & Policy for the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency. The SFMTA manages and coordinates all the modes of transportation (including parking and street enforcement) in the City. Timothy has an undergraduate degree in applied science (urban and regional economic planning) from the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology and California Polytechnic University and a master of arts (Transportation Planning) from the University of California, Los Angeles. John Polak, Imperial College London Professor John Polak is the Chairman of the Centre for Transport Studies and the Director of Research in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, both at Imperial College London. He is a past President of the International Association for Travel Behaviour Research and a past Council Member of the Association for European Transport, and serves on the editorial advisory boards of a number of leading international scientific journals. iv Shashi Verma, Transport for London Shashi Verma is Director of Customer Experience at Transport for London. Shashi has responsibility for the operation of TfL’s revenue collection system including the Oyster card, the largest smartcard based ticketing system in the world, and advising the Mayor of London on fares and ticketing policy. Since his previous role of Director of Fares & Ticketing Shashi has focused on improving the performance of ticketing systems, which are now at a record high; on reducing the cost of ticketing services, achieved through an early termination of the Prestige Ticketing Services Contract; on extending the reach of Oyster on London’s national rail and river services; and on developing the next generation of fare collection solutions for London. Scott Le Vine, Imperial College London Dr Scott Le Vine is dually-appointed as an Assistant Professor (Urban Planning) at SUNY New Paltz (NY, USA) and a Research Associate in the Centre for Transport Studies, Imperial College London. He serves on three standing committees of the USA’s National Academy of Sciences’ Transportation Research Board. He is a trustee of the charity Carplus. Christian Wolmar Christian Wolmar is a writer and broadcaster specialising in transport and has written a series of books on railways including ‘On the Wrong Line, how ideology and incompetence wrecked Britain’s railways’, ‘Fire & Steam, a new history of Britain’s railways’, and most recently ‘To the edge of the world, the history of the Transsiberian railway’. He has also co-edited a book on financing urban transport, Urban Access for the 21st Century published by Routledge. He has written a column for Rail magazine since 1995 and frequently contributes to national newspapers such as The Guardian and The Times. Christian was a board member of Cycling England until its abolition in the spring of 2011 and was a founding trustee of the Railway Children charity. v Acknowledgements The RAC Foundation would like to thank the authors for contributing their views to this collection of essays. This report has been collated, edited and reviewed by Professor Stephen Glaister, Director and Elizabeth Box, Head of Research at the RAC Foundation. Both editors would like to thank RAC Foundation colleagues for their assistance in producing this document. Particular thanks go to Philip Gomm, Head of External Communications and Ivo Wengraf, Research & Data Manager at the RAC Foundation. Disclaimer This collection of essays has been prepared for the RAC Foundation by the authors and organisations listed. The report content reflects the views of the authors and not necessarily those of the RAC Foundation.
Recommended publications
  • Thames Estuary Airport: AEF Position Paper

    Thames Estuary Airport: AEF Position Paper

    Thames estuary airport: AEF position paper 3rd December 2009 Summary The London Mayor has suggested that the development of an estuary airport may provide an alternative to Heathrow expansion and commissioned Doug Oakervee, the engineer who masterminded Hong Kong’s island airport, to conduct a feasibility study. This briefing takes a historical look at estuary airport proposals and the issues that have arisen, assesses the recent report from Douglas Oakervee, and sets out AEF’s view on the proposal to construct a new airport in the Thames Estuary. AEF considers that all UK aviation expansion plans should be put on hold pending a review of the fundamental evidence underpinning Government policy on airports. We are concerned about the environmental impacts of a new airport in the Thames Estuary in terms of biodiversity loss and likely increases in greenhouse gas emissions as a result of increased aviation activity. Purported environmental benefits of in terms of noise, air pollution and risk, meanwhile, remain uncertain. We are therefore opposed to the building of a new airport in the Thames Estuary, and consider that rather than investing further public money into consideration of new airports, investment should instead focus on provision and promotion of low-carbon alternatives to aviation. Why estuary airport proposals have never got off the ground: some historical examples Maplin Sands A proposal to build a new airport at Maplin Sands was considered as part of the Airports inquiries 1981-83. TCPA – the Town and Country Planning Association – supported it on the grounds that, in terms of both agricultural and noise impacts, it was preferable to the expansion of Stansted.
  • Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945

    Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945

    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--History History 2016 Minding the Gap: Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945 Danielle K. Dodson University of Kentucky, [email protected] Digital Object Identifier: http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/ETD.2016.339 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Dodson, Danielle K., "Minding the Gap: Uncovering the Underground's Role in the Formation of Modern London, 1855-1945" (2016). Theses and Dissertations--History. 40. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/history_etds/40 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the History at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--History by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
  • Inner Thames Estuary Airport: Review of the Evidence on Socio- Economic Impacts a Report for the Airports Commission

    Inner Thames Estuary Airport: Review of the Evidence on Socio- Economic Impacts a Report for the Airports Commission

    www.pwc.co.uk Inner Thames Estuary Airport: Review of the evidence on socio- economic impacts A report for the Airports Commission Airports Commission June 2014 Final report www.pwc.co.uk Important notice This final document has been prepared for the Airports Commission in accordance with the terms of the Provision of Consultancy for Commercial, Financial and Economic Option Appraisal and Analysis (DfT) framework and the Contract Reference RM 2750 (650) dated 12th February 2014 and solely for the purpose and on the terms agreed with the Airports Commission. We accept no liability (including for negligence) to anyone else in connection with this document. This document contains information obtained or derived from a variety of third party sources as indicated within the document. PwC has not sought to establish the reliability of those sources or verified the information so provided. Should any person other than the Airports Commission obtain access to and read this document, such persons accepts and agrees to the following terms: 1. The reader of this document understands that the work performed by PwC was performed in accordance with instructions provided by our client, the Airports Commission, and was performed exclusively for their benefit and use. The document may therefore not include all matters relevant to the reader. 2. The reader agrees that PwC accepts no liability (including for negligence) to them in connection with this document. Inner Thames Estuary Airport: Review of the evidence on socio-economic impacts Contents Executive summary 2 1. Introduction 6 2. Rationale for airport closure and commercial considerations 8 3.
  • Economic & Business History

    Economic & Business History

    This article was published online on April 26, 2019 Final version June 30, 2019 Essays in ECONOMIC & BUSINESS HISTORY The Journal of the Economic &Business History Society Editors Mark Billings, University of Exeter Daniel Giedeman, Grand Valley State University Copyright © 2019, The Economic and Business History Society. This is an open access journal. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ISSN 0896-226X LCC 79-91616 HC12.E2 Statistics and London Underground Railways STATISTICS: SPUR TO PRODUCTIVITY OR PUBLICITY STUNT? LONDON UNDERGROUND RAILWAYS 1913-32 James Fowler The York Management School University of York [email protected] A rapid deterioration in British railways’ financial results around 1900 sparked an intense debate about how productivity might be improved. As a comparison it was noted that US railways were much more productive and employed far more detailed statistical accounting methods, though the connection between the two was disputed and the distinction between the managerial and regulatory role of US statistical collection was unexplored. Nevertheless, The Railway Companies (Accounts and Returns) Act was passed in 1911 and from 1913 a continuous, detailed and standardized set of data was produced by all rail companies including the London underground. However, this did not prevent their eventual amalgamation into the London Passenger Transport Board in 1933 on grounds of efficiency. This article finds that despite the hopes of the protagonists, collecting more detailed statistics did not improve productivity and suggests that their primary use was in generating publicity to influence shareholders’, passengers’ and workers’ perceptions.
  • Flying Into the Future Infrastructure for Business 2012 #4 Flying Into the Future

    Flying Into the Future Infrastructure for Business 2012 #4 Flying Into the Future

    Infrastructure for Business Flying into the Future Infrastructure for Business 2012 #4 Flying into the Future Flying into the Future têáííÉå=Äó=`çêáå=q~óäçêI=pÉåáçê=bÅçåçãáÅ=^ÇîáëÉê=~í=íÜÉ=fça aÉÅÉãÄÉê=OMNO P Infrastructure for Business 2012 #4 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ________________________________________ 5 1. GRowInG AVIATIon SUSTAInABlY ______________________ 27 2. ThE FoUR CRUnChES ______________________________ 35 3. ThE BUSInESS VIEw oF AIRpoRT CApACITY ______________ 55 4. A lonG-TERM plAn FoR GRowTh ____________________ 69 Q Flying into the Future Executive summary l Aviation provides significant benefits to the economy, and as the high growth markets continue to power ahead, flying will become even more important. “A holistic plan is nearly two thirds of IoD members think that direct flights to the high growth countries will be important to their own business over the next decade. needed to improve l Aviation is bad for the global and local environment, but quieter and cleaner aviation in the UK. ” aircraft and improved operational and ground procedures can allow aviation to grow in a sustainable way. l The UK faces four related crunches – hub capacity now; overall capacity in the South East by 2030; excessive taxation; and an unwelcoming visa and border set-up – reducing the UK’s connectivity and making it more difficult and more expensive to get here. l This report sets out a holistic aviation plan, with 25 recommendations to address six key areas: − Making the best use of existing capacity in the short term; − Making decisions about where new runways should be built as soon as possible, so they can open in the medium term; − Ensuring good surface access and integration with the wider transport network, in particular planning rail services together with airport capacity, not separately; − Dealing with noise and other local environment impacts; − Not raising taxes any further; − Improving the visa regime and operations at the UK border.
  • A Monte-Carlo Approach to Estimating the Effects of Selected Airport Capacity Options in London

    A Monte-Carlo Approach to Estimating the Effects of Selected Airport Capacity Options in London

    A Monte-Carlo approach to estimating the effects of selected airport capacity options in London. Daniel Irvine, Lucy C.S. Budd and David E. Pitfield. Transport Studies Group, School of Civil & Building Engineering Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU U.K. [email protected] Abstract The issue of future airport capacity in London is currently the subject of much political debate in the UK. Through the use of Monte Carlo simulation, the paper quantifies and compares the relative capacity enhancements that may be afforded by the construction of a new hub airport, additional runways at Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted and changes to operating practices at Heathrow. The simulations indicate that a new hub airport would be the most effective way to increase capacity, although the reported financial and environmental costs of such a development suggest a comparatively poor rate of return. Proposed new runways at Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted and the removal of runway alternation at Heathrow provide more modest increases in capacity. Keywords: airport capacity, Monte Carlo simulation, London, UK. 1. Introduction Debates surrounding the provision of future airport capacity in London and the South East have had a long and controversial pedigree with the issue polarised between those who claim connectivity is vital for economic growth and those who believe that 1 airport expansion creates an unjustifiable social and environmental burden. At the time of writing, a UK Government-appointed Airports Commission, chaired by Sir Howard Davies, is evaluating a number of possible options to enhance airport capacity in London and the south east. This paper employs Monte Carlo simulation to provide estimations of the relative effect on airport capacity that five proposals, which are all reportedly under consideration, afford.
  • Development & Policy Forecast for Global and Chinese NEV Markets

    Development & Policy Forecast for Global and Chinese NEV Markets

    Development & Policy Forecast for Global and Chinese NEV Markets in 2021 Invited by China EV 100, officials and experts from domestic and foreign government agencies, industry associations, research institutions and businesses attended the 7th China EV 100 Forum in January 15-17, 2021. The summary below captures the observations and insight of the speakers at the forum on the industry trend and policy forecast in the world and China in 2021. Ⅰ. 2021 Global & China Auto Market Trend 1. In 2021, the global auto market may resume growth, and the NEV boom is set to continue. 2020 saw a prevalent downturn of the auto sector in major countries due to the onslaught of COVID-19, yet the sales of NEVs witnessed a spike despite the odds, with much greater penetration in various countries. The monthly penetration of electric vehicles in Germany jumped from 7% to 20% in half a year and is expected to hit 12% in 2020, up 220% year on year; Norway reported an 80% market share of EVs in November, which is projected to exceed 70% for the whole year, topping the global ranking. Multiple consultancy firms foresee a comeback of global sales growth and a continuance of NEV boom in 2021 as coronavirus eases. 2. China's auto market as a whole is expected to remain stable in 2021, 1 with a strong boost in NEV sales. In 2020, China spearheaded global NEV market growth with record sales of 1.367 million units. The Development Research Center of the State Council expects overall auto sales to grow slightly in 2021, which ranges 0-2%.
  • Squatting – the Real Story

    Squatting – the Real Story

    Squatters are usually portrayed as worthless scroungers hell-bent on disrupting society. Here at last is the inside story of the 250,000 people from all walks of life who have squatted in Britain over the past 12 years. The country is riddled with empty houses and there are thousands of homeless people. When squatters logically put the two together the result can be electrifying, amazing and occasionally disastrous. SQUATTING the real story is a unique and diverse account the real story of squatting. Written and produced by squatters, it covers all aspects of the subject: • The history of squatting • Famous squats • The politics of squatting • Squatting as a cultural challenge • The facts behind the myths • Squatting around the world and much, much more. Contains over 500 photographs plus illustrations, cartoons, poems, songs and 4 pages of posters and murals in colour. Squatting: a revolutionary force or just a bunch of hooligans doing their own thing? Read this book for the real story. Paperback £4.90 ISBN 0 9507259 1 9 Hardback £11.50 ISBN 0 9507259 0 0 i Electronic version (not revised or updated) of original 1980 edition in portable document format (pdf), 2005 Produced and distributed by Nick Wates Associates Community planning specialists 7 Tackleway Hastings TN34 3DE United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)1424 447888 Fax: +44 (0)1424 441514 Email: [email protected] Web: www.nickwates.co.uk Digital layout by Mae Wates and Graphic Ideas the real story First published in December 1980 written by Nick Anning by Bay Leaf Books, PO Box 107, London E14 7HW Celia Brown Set in Century by Pat Sampson Piers Corbyn Andrew Friend Cover photo by Union Place Collective Mark Gimson Printed by Blackrose Press, 30 Clerkenwell Close, London EC1R 0AT (tel: 01 251 3043) Andrew Ingham Pat Moan Cover & colour printing by Morning Litho Printers Ltd.
  • Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Revitalization of the AM Radio Service ) MB Docket No. 13-249 REPLY COMMENTS OF THE AM RADIO PRESERVATION ALLIANCE ON FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE MAKING The AM Radio Preservation Alliance Members: Alpha Media LLC Bonneville International Corporation CBS Radio Inc. Cox Media Group, LLC Cumulus Media Inc. Entercom Communications Corp. Family Stations, Inc. Grand Ole Opry, LLC Greater Media, Inc. Hearst Stations Inc. Hubbard Radio, LLC iHeartMedia + Entertainment, Inc. NRG License Sub, LLC Scripps Media, Inc. Townsquare Media, Inc. Tyler Media, L.L.C. Tribune Broadcasting Company, LLC April 18, 2016 SUMMARY These Reply Comments are submitted by the AM Radio Preservation Alliance (the “Alliance”) addressing those proposals in the Commission’s Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, FCC 15-142, MB Docket No. 13-249 (the “FNPRM”) to alter interference protections for Class A AM stations and to reduce the protected daytime contours for Class B, C and D AM stations. These FNPRM proposals, and the variations thereof suggested by certain commenters, would do more harm than good, and if adopted, would undermine the efforts to revitalize the AM radio service undertaken in the Commission’s First Report and Order in this proceeding. The Alliance Comments filed in this docket submitted evidence, grounded in audience data, listener responses and engineering studies, establishing that the FNPRM proposals to protect Class A AM stations only to their 0.1 mV/m groundwave
  • ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS (ADAS) JUNE 2019 a Guide to Advanced Driver Assistance Systems

    ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS (ADAS) JUNE 2019 a Guide to Advanced Driver Assistance Systems

    ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS (ADAS) JUNE 2019 A Guide to Advanced Driver Assistance Systems As technology becomes more advanced, a growing number of vehicles are being built with intelligent systems to help motorists. Advanced Driver Assistance Systems, or ADAS, is a term used to describe these smart features. ADAS includes relatively simple features like rear view cameras to help with parking through to more complicated systems like Lane Departure Warning (LDW) that can detect a vehicle’s surroundings. These advanced systems can actually take some control of the vehicle, such as Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB). In this guide, we describe the ADAS technology available and their benefits, which could be useful when you and your drivers are selecting your next vehicle. What is ADAS? Whether your car has adaptive high beams, a collision detection system or autonomous night vision, these are all classed as Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS). If you and your drivers understand what these smart features are and what they do, you can get the most benefit from them, improving your driving experience and making other road users safer. Please be aware that the information in this guide is correct as at June 2019 but things move fast in this area. 1 A guide to advanced driver assistance systems Light Assisted Technology AFLS - Adaptive Front Lighting System System that automatically turns the headlight beam to the right or left dependent on the vehicle’s direction. AHBC – Adaptive High Beam Control ALC - Adaptive Light Control Detects oncoming traffic and vehicles in front, automatically adjusting the headlamp beam high and low.
  • Human Centred Design of First and Last Mile Mobility Vehicles

    Human Centred Design of First and Last Mile Mobility Vehicles

    Coventry University DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Human centred design of first and last mile mobility vehicles Wasser, Joscha Award date: 2020 Awarding institution: Coventry University Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of this thesis for personal non-commercial research or study • This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission from the copyright holder(s) • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 11. Oct. 2021 Human Centred Design of First and Last Mile Mobility Vehicles by 1,2,4 Joscha Wasser A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the University’s requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Supervisors: Andrew Parkes1, Cyriel Diels3, Michael Tovey1 and Anthony Baxendale2 1 The National Transport Design Centre, Swift Road, Coventry CV1 2TT, UK 2 HORIBA MIRA Ltd, Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, UK 3 Royal College of Art, Kensington Gore, Kensington, London SW7 2EU, UK 4 Fraunhofer FKIE, Fraunhoferstraße 20, 53343 Wachtberg, Germany Content removed on data protection grounds 2 3 4 5 6 Content removed on data protection grounds 7 Content removed on data protection grounds 8 Content removed on data protection grounds 9 10 Acknowledgements I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Dr.
  • Paving the Way to Self-Driving Cars with ADAS (Rev. A)

    Paving the Way to Self-Driving Cars with ADAS (Rev. A)

    Paving the way to self-driving cars with advanced driver assistance systems Hannes Estl Worldwide Systems Marketing for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), Texas Instruments Recent publicity has attracted the public eye to the development of automated vehicles, especially Google’s experimental cars that have logged thousands of self-driven miles with minimal help from human drivers. These events are truly impressive, and in the long term will help revolutionize vehicle operation and our experience of driving. But the excitement about self-driving cars can make it easy to overlook numerous short-term developments by automotive manufacturers that are equally important in transforming the act of driving. Collectively known as Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), these developments are designed to make cars safer, and their gradual introduction is already improving road safety. In addition, ADAS features represent an evolution in vehicle sensing, intelligence and control that will ultimately lead to self-driving cars. ADAS technologies exist at different levels of active Volume production of automobiles with fully assistance and are being introduced in overlapping autonomous control is probably a decade away stages. Driver information systems, such as simple at this time, although as today’s experiments rear-view cameras, surround-view displays, and demonstrate, the essential technology for self- blind spot and lane departure warnings, provide driving cars already exists. However, advanced information but leave the driver in full control at all electronic systems take up much of the space in times. Partially autonomous systems, such as lane- automated test vehicles and are far more expensive keep assistance and active cruise control, enable than the cars themselves.