Frankenstein's Monster in the 21St Century
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
REFLECTING ON MONSTERS (AFTER FRANKENSTEIN) ACTATE CONFERENCE 10 MAY 2019 DR RUSSELL SMITH: [email protected] REFLECTING ON MONSTERS (AFTER FRANKENSTEIN) • ENGL3008: Introduction to Literary Theory • Frankenstein 2018: Two hundred years of monsters (NFSA/ANU) • Secondary Students Workshop: Frankenstein’s Monster Reinvented • Nineteenth Century Contexts 41.3 (2019) and Continuum • Frankenstein in the Automatic Factory ENGL3008: INTRODUCTION TO LITERARY THEORY http://knarf.english.upenn.edu/ Week Lecture Beginning Theory On Frankenstein Theoretical texts 1 23 Jul Mary Shelley, Frankenstein (1818) Frankenstein and the Limits of the Human 2 30 Jul Liberal Humanism and Chapter 1: Theory before George Levine, Liberal Humanist ‘theory’ ‘Frankenstein and the Tradition Feminism of Realism’ (Norton/UPenn) Ellen Moers, ‘Female Gothic: The Monster’s Mother’ (Norton/UPenn) 3 6 Aug Structuralism Chapter 2: Structuralism Anne K. Mellor, ‘Possessing Ferdinand de Saussure, Course Nature: The Female in General Linguistics (Wattle) in Frankenstein’ (Norton) 4 13 Aug Post-structuralism and Chapter 3: Post-structuralism Lawrence Lipking, ‘Frankenstein, Roland Barthes, ‘The Death of deconstruction and deconstruction the True Story; or, Rousseau the Author’ (Wattle) Judges Jean-Jacques’ (Norton) ENGL3008: INTRODUCTION TO LITERARY THEORY Week Lecture Beginning Theory On Frankenstein Theoretical texts 5 20 Aug Psychoanalysis 1: Freud Chapter 5: Psychoanalytic criticism Rosemary Jackson, ‘Narcissism and Sigmund Freud, from The (Freud 97-110) Beyond: A Psychoanalytic Reading Interpretation of Dreams (Wattle) of Frankenstein and Fantasies of Frankenstein (1931) the Double’ (UPenn) 6 27 Aug Psychoanalysis 2: Lacan Chapter 5: Psychoanalytic criticism *Peter Brooks, ‘What Is a Monster? Jacques Lacan, ‘The Mirror Stage (Lacan 110-122) (According as Formative of the Function of the to Frankenstein)’ (Norton/UPenn) I’ (Wattle) *Jacques Lacan, ‘The Instance of the Letter in the Unconscious’ (Wattle) Bride of Frankenstein (1935) 7 17 Sep Post-structuralist Feminism Chapter 6: Feminist criticism Mary Jacobus, ‘Is There a Woman Diane Hoeveler, ‘Frankenstein, in This Text?' (UPenn) feminism, and literary theory’ (Wattle) 8 24 Sep Queer Theory Chapter 7: Queer theory George E. Haggerty, ‘What is Judith Butler, ‘Performative Acts Queer and Gender Constitution’ (Wattle) about Frankenstein?’ (Wattle) Iron Man (2008) ENGL3008: INTRODUCTION TO LITERARY THEORY Week Lecture Beginning Theory On Frankenstein Theoretical texts 9 1 Oct Marxism / Postcolonialism Chapter 8: Marxist criticism Paul O’Flinn, ‘Production and Ex Machina (2015) Chapter 10: Postcolonial criticism Reproduction: The Case of Frankenstein’ (UPenn) Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, ‘Three Women's Texts and a Critique of Imperialism’ (UPenn) 10 8 Oct Humanism / Posthumanism Chapter 15: Posthumanism (335- TBA TBA / Transhumanism 341) 11 15 Oct Ecocriticism Chapter 13: Ecocriticism Jonathan Bate, [Frankenstein and Greg Garrard, ‘Chapter 1: the State of Nature] (Norton) Beginnings: Pollution’, in Ecocriticism (Wattle) 12 22 Oct Theory now Chapter 14: Literary theory: a Fuson Wang, ‘The Historicist Turn Lennard J. Davis, ‘Introduction: history in ten events of Romantic-Era Disability Studies, Normality, Power, and Culture.’ or, Frankenstein in the Dark' (Wattle) (Wattle) Frankenstein in 1818: historicising the monster (Professor Sharon Ruston, Lancaster) Frankenstein as scientific fable: from grave-robbing and galvanism to synthetic biology and machine learning (Genevieve Bell, Australian National University) Adaptation and experimentation: Frankenstein in film and other media (Shane Denson, Stanford) Frankenstein’s queer family: gender, sexuality, reproduction and the work of care (Julie Carlson, University of California, Santa Barbara) Australian Institute of Anatomy Under construction 1929-1931 Australian Institute of Anatomy, 1931 Australian Institute of Anatomy Museum, c.1931-1932 Australian Institute of Anatomy Museum, c.1931-1932 FRANKENSTEIN’S MONSTER REINVENTED • The novel and the myth • Frankenstein 1818 • Frankenstein 1931 • Frankenstein 2018? FRANKENSTEIN’S MONSTER REINVENTED • The ‘core story’ of the myth: scientific experiment/technological development creates human-like entity that escapes control, threatens creator, human race • Essential aspects of Mary Shelley’s novel are inessential to the myth: • The monster is assembled from pieces of dead bodies • The monster is eloquent, and engages the sympathy of both Victor and the reader • The monster is not inherently evil but becomes vengeful due to isolation and neglect • The novel is neutral about science per se FRANKENSTEIN’S MONSTER REINVENTED Frankenstein is ‘the first modern narrative about ALife’ (5) ALife’s ‘thematic’: in what sense is this entity ‘alive’? ALife’s ‘problematic’: does this entity participate in a life-cycle: grow, learn, die, and, most importantly, reproduce? (6) John Johnston, ‘AI and ALife’, in Bruce Clarke and Manuela Rossini, eds., The Routledge Companion to Literature and Science, London: Routledge, 2010) FRANKENSTEIN’S MONSTER REINVENTED ‘ALife’s thematic became possible as a fictional interest with the beginnings of the properly scientific study of life, that is, with the emergence of biology in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, whereas AI, with rare exceptions, became a serious fictional interest only after the birth of the computer. … For the first time in human history, intelligence is divorced from life, making it possible to be intelligent but not alive.’ (5, 7) John Johnston, ‘AI and ALife’, in Bruce Clarke and Manuela Rossini, eds., The Routledge Companion to Literature and Science, London: Routledge, 2010) FRANKENSTEIN’S MONSTER REINVENTED Frankenstein (1818) in context • The materialist-vitalist debate at the Royal College of Surgeons between William Lawrence and John Abernethy (1814-1819) • The Industrial Revolution, the Luddite disturbances (1811-1817) and the Frame Breaking Act (1812) • The reception of the novel as a political allegory of the dangers of broadening representation FRANKENSTEIN’S MONSTER REINVENTED Frankenstein (1931) in context • The ‘Second Industrial Revolution’ (mass production, electricity) culminating in Henry Ford’s introduction of the assembly line (1913) • The Great Depression (1929-1932) • The advent of sound in cinema (1929) • Hays Code in place (1930) but not yet enforced (1934) • Decline of the Ku Klux Klan in late 1920s, campaigns against lynching FRANKENSTEIN’S MONSTER REINVENTED FRANKENSTEIN’S MONSTER REINVENTED After the ‘Third Industrial Revolution’ (automation, computers, electronics) Frankenstein becomes a story more about AI than ALife: • robots (automata) • androids (anthropomorphic robots) • replicants/mecha/synths/hosts (indistinguishable from humans) FRANKENSTEIN’S MONSTER: KILLER ROBOT? • Hapless Boston Dynamics robot in shelf-stacking fail https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzlsvFN_5HI • New dog-like robot from Boston Dynamics can open doors https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXxrmussq4E • Black Mirror S4 E5, Metalhead FRANKENSTEIN’S MONSTER: MUNDANE AI? • Financial management (Flash Crash 2010) • Social security (Centrelink ‘robo-debt’ 2017-) • Loans and mortgages, health insurance (My Health Record), job applications • Cambridge Analytica, Brexit, Trump, AI ‘sock puppets’ • Surveillance, privacy, big data, black box algorithms, algorithmic discrimination: Assistance and Access Bill 2018 will give government agencies access to encrypted data, and allow direct covert access to your device FRANKENSTEIN’S MONSTER: MUNDANE AI? Tom Warren, ‘Amazon explains how Alexa recorded a private conversation and sent it to another user’, The Verge 24 May 2018: https://www.theverge.com/2018/5/2 4/17391898/amazon-alexa-private- conversation-recording-explanation FRANKENSTEIN’S MONSTER: MUNDANE AI? ‘With keystroke biometrics, typing style could identify you and even know your mood’, One World Identity 11 May 2017: https://oneworldidentity.com/keystrok e-biometrics-typing-style-identify- even-determine-mood/ FRANKENSTEIN’S MONSTER: MUNDANE AI? ‘the computer model could judge someone better than a friend or roommate by analyzing just 70 likes, and do better than a parent or sibling with 150 likes’ Steve Dent, ‘Researchers can profile Facebook users to a 'T' with just their likes’, Engadget 13 January 2015 https://www.engadget.com/2015/01 /13/facebook-like-psychometric- research/ FRANKENSTEIN’S MONSTER: MUNDANE AI? Dylan Curran, ‘Are you ready? Here is all the data Facebook and Google have on you’, The Guardian 30 March 2018: https://www.theguardian.com/comment isfree/2018/mar/28/all-the-data- facebook-google-has-on-you-privacy A: everywhere you’ve been; everything you’ve searched and deleted; every email you’ve sent; contacts; calendars; every website you’ve visited, everything you’ve clicked; and much more… 19CC Alexander Cook, ‘Perfecting Monstrosity: Frankenstein and the Enlightenment Debate on Perfectibility’ Sharon Ruston, ‘Chemistry and the Science of Transformation in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein’ Thomas H. Ford, ‘Frankenscription, A Natural History of Poetry’ Julie A. Carlson, ‘Just Friends? Frankenstein and the Friend to Come’ Russell Smith, ‘Frankenstein in the Automatic Factory’ Martin Willis, ‘Scientific Self-Fashioning after Frankenstein: The afterlives of Shelley’s novel in Victorian sciences and medicine’ CONTINUUM Tiffany Basili, “It’s Alive!”: Women’s Objectification and Subjectivity in Film Adaptations of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein Russell Smith,