|||GET||| the Logic of Science in Sociology 1St Edition

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

|||GET||| the Logic of Science in Sociology 1St Edition THE LOGIC OF SCIENCE IN SOCIOLOGY 1ST EDITION DOWNLOAD FREE Walter Wallace | 9781351479981 | | | | | Knowledge and Social Imagery Shapere, D. These various factors are the grounds for his holding office. Positivism is a philosophical theory which states that "genuine" knowledge knowledge of anything which is not true by definition is exclusively derived from experience of natural phenomena and their properties and relations. Now that Many Ones have been posited out of their Repulsion from the One, their original Oneness reasserts itself and their Repulsion passes over to b Attraction. Every Quality is connected to, and in equilibrium with, its corresponding other. Buchdahl, D. Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. Cantor, G. We are always looking for ways to improve customer experience on Elsevier. The early sociology of Herbert Spencer came about broadly as a reaction to Comte; writing after various developments in evolutionary biology, Spencer attempted in vain to reformulate the discipline in what we might now describe as socially Darwinistic terms. The constant that results from this ratio is the inner characteristic Real Measure of the thing in question, but, taking the form as it does of a mere number, a Quantum, this constant is likewise subject to alteration, i. Action Event Process. Beveridge, W. Otto Neurath Editor. Authority control BNF : cbm data. From the standpoint of this Ideal One, both Repulsion and Attraction now presuppose each other, and, taken one step further, each presupposes itself as mediated by the other. The Logic of Science in Sociology 1st edition occurs The Logic of Science in Sociology 1st edition often in The Science of Logica negation that is itself negated produces a new affirmative standpoint, the formerly negated terms having become the unified moments thereof. There is Nothing in it. Dana marked it as to-read Dec 24, It is The Logic of Science in Sociology 1st edition a classic work, and commentators have praised it for Nagel's discussion of reductionism and holismas well as for his criticism of Berlin. For Hegel, the most important achievement of German idealismstarting with Immanuel Kant and culminating in his own philosophy, was the argument that reality being is shaped through and through by thought and is, in a strong sense, identical to thought. Although now united by the Quantitative Ratio, the two or more Qualities thus brought into relation retain their mutual separation as distinct Qualities. The Logic of Science in Sociology 1st edition is neither a Determinate Being, nor a Something, nor a Constitution, etc. Things are Like each other insofar as they are not Unlike each other and vice versa: the two terms are mutually exclusive insofar as they refer to the same thing, but in themselvesapart from the things they refer to, there is no difference between them. Main articles: Antipositivism and Critical theory. This contradiction is resolved by their immediate vanishing, one into the other. ENW EndNote. Hardcoverpages. Cullen Enn marked it as to-read Oct 13, Kuhn, T. Illusory Being, as has already been established, is a nullity, nothingness. Barwise, M. Thus, information derived from sensory experienceas interpreted through reason and logicforms the exclusive source of all certain knowledge. Available in German in Neue Aspekte der Wissenschaftstheorie ed. Although unified in Quantity, Continuity and Discreteness still retain their distinction from one another. His basic beliefs were "an extreme anti-aesthetic scientistic position. In contemporary social science, strong accounts of positivism have long since fallen out of favour. Your review was sent successfully and is now waiting for our team to publish it. As having been sublated, the mediation which was performed by the True Infinite between the Finite and the Infinite now has resulted in their immediate unity. Positivism in the social sciences is usually characterized by quantitative approaches and the proposition of quasi-absolute laws. Average rating 3. One designates an inner Quality, in this case weight; the other designates an external Quality, in this case volume, the amount of space it takes up. Echoes of the "positivist" and "antipositivist" debate persist today, though this conflict is hard to define. Sort order. The negation that Being-in-Itself experienced in the Limitation, the negation that made it Finite, is again negated resulting in the affirmative determination The Logic of Science in Sociology 1st edition a the Infinite in General which now reveals itself, not as something distinct from, but as the true nature of the Finite. Logical positivism later and more accurately called logical The Logic of Science in Sociology 1st edition is a school of philosophy that combines empiricismthe idea that observational evidence is indispensable for knowledge of the world, with a version of rationalismthe idea that our knowledge includes a component that is not derived from observation. Boland, Economic Positivism positivists. Foundations of the Unity of Science, Vol 2 Gaifman, F. Theodor W. He found Nagel's case that it was possible in the case of the natural sciences more convincing. The idea of progress was central to Comte's new science, sociology. This role is entirely taken up by Essence which is pure mediation relative to Illusory Being's pure immediacy. American Sociological Review. It is therefore by their common Limits that Somethings and Others The Logic of Science in Sociology 1st edition mediated with one another and mutually define each other's inner Qualities. Science of Logic also incorporates the traditional Aristotelian syllogism : It The Logic of Science in Sociology 1st edition conceived as a phase of the "original unity of thought and being" rather than as a detached, formal instrument of inference. Fundamental Principles of the Ethics of Science. All the determinations of Being covered in the first third of the Science of Logic are no longer self-subsistent, but only "are" at all as negations of Essence. He praised Nagel for the thoroughness of his treatment of the nature of scientific inquiry, his discussion of explanation in the biological sciences, his criticism of functionalism in the social sciences, and his discussion of historical explanation. Perspectives Antihumanism Empiricism Rationalism Scientism. For example, some postpositivists accept the critique that observation is always value-laden, but argue that the best values to adopt for sociological observation are those of science: skepticism, rigor, and modesty. He suggested that Nagel might have personal reasons for favoring belief in determinism over belief in free will, and criticized him for failing to discuss the The Logic of Science in Sociology 1st edition between science and "big business". Logical positivists or 'neopositivists' rejected metaphysical speculation and attempted to reduce statements and propositions to pure logic. Those that apply this mode of thinking to something are making an arbitrary distinction, the opposite of which could always be claimed with equal justification. Read more Cohen, I. Namespaces Article Talk. Outline of epistemology Faith and rationality Formal epistemology Meta- epistemology Philosophy of perception Philosophy of science Social epistemology. This is due to two truths: The positivist phase requires having a complete understanding of the universe and world around us and requires that society should never know if it is in this positivist phase. This a One in its Own Selfstanding in negative relation to all its preceding moments, is entirely differentiated The Logic of Science in Sociology 1st edition each of them. Thus ultimately the structures of thought and being, subject and object, are identical. Emile Hennequin was a Parisian publisher and writer who wrote theoretical and critical pieces. Nothingspecifically Pure Nothing, "is simply equality with itself, complete emptinessabsence of all determination and content. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Colodnypp. Main article: Antipositivism. The category of Identity itself, however, is not determined by whatever it is that it is applied to, but by its reflection off of Difference back into itself. Dimitri Pisarev was a Russian critic who showed the greatest contradictions with his belief in positivism. BNF : cbm data. The One having been restored to unity by Attraction now contains Repulsion and Attraction within it as moments. Fausto Nicolini Milan: R. Historically, positivism has been criticized for its reductionismi. In contemporary social science, strong accounts of positivism have long since fallen out of favour. Therefore, the series of Quantitative relationships between these Real Measures only determines the c Elective Affinity between their different Qualities, but not these Qualities themselves. Antiscience Bibliometrics Boundary-work Consilience Criticism of science Demarcation problem Double hermeneutic Logology Mapping controversies Metascience Paradigm shift black swan events Pseudoscience Psychology of science Science citizen communication education normal post-normal rhetoric wars Scientific community consensus controversy dissent enterprise literacy method misconduct priority skepticism Scientocracy Scientometrics Team science Traditional knowledge ecological Unity of science Women in science STEM. History of Science and its Rational Reconstructions Richard Avenarius A. Arguments against positivist approaches in
Recommended publications
  • The Behavioral Sciences: Essays in Honor of GEORGE A. LUNDBERG
    The Behavioral Sciences: Essays in Honor of George A. Lundberg The Behavioral Sciences: Essays in Honor of GEORGE A. LUNDBERG edited by ALFRED DE GRAZIA RoLLoHANDY E. C. HARWOOD PAUL KURTZ published by The Behavioral Research Council Great Barrington, Massachusetts Copyright © 1968 by Behavioral Research Council Preface This volume of collected essays is dedicated to the memory of George A. Lundberg. It is fitting that this volume is published under the auspices of the Behavioral Research Council. George Lundberg, as its first President, and one of its founding members, was dedicated to the goals of the Behavioral Research Council: namely, the encouragement and development of behavioral science research and its application to the problems of men in society. He has been a constant inspiration to behavioral research not only in sociology, where he was considered to be a classic figure and a major influence but in the behavioral sciences in general. Part One of this volume includes papers on George Lundberg and his scientific work, particularly in the field of sociology. Orig­ inally read at a special conference of the Pacific Sociological Association (March 30-April 1, 1967), the papers are here pub­ lished by permission of the Society. Part Two contains papers not directly on George Lundberg but on themes and topics close to his interest. They are written by members of the Behavioral Research Council. We hope that this volume is a token, however small, of the pro­ found contribution that George Lundberg has made to the de­ velopment of the behavioral sciences. We especially wish to thank the contributors of the George A.
    [Show full text]
  • STEM Education for the Future
    STEM 1 STEM STEM 3 STEM SUBCOMMITTEE MEMBERS Dr. Margaret Honey (Chair) | Dr. Bruce Alberts Dr. Hyman Bass | Dr. Carlos Castillo | Dr. Okhee Lee Dr. Marilyn M. Strutchens | Dr. Laurel Vermillion Dr. Francisco Rodriguez (Ex-Officio Member) NSF LIAISON Dr. Robin Wright (Division Director, Undergraduate Education) EXECUTIVE SECRETARY Dr. Alexandra Medina-Borja (NSF EHR/DUE) 4 STEM “All citizens can contribute to our nation’s progress and vibrancy. To be prepared for the STEM careers of the future, all learners must have an equitable opportunity to acquire foundational STEM knowledge. The STEM Education of the Future brings together our advanced understanding of how people learn with modern technology to create more personalized learning experiences, to inspire learning, and to foster creativity from an early age. It will unleash and harness the curiosity of young people and adult learners across the United States, cultivating a culture of innovation and inquiry, and ensuring our nation remains the global leader in science and technology discovery and competitiveness.” A VISION STATEMENT FOR STEM EDUCATION OF THE FUTURE 5 6 PREFACE Rapid technological advancements and societal changes are our daily reality. While the future of work, the economy, and society is uncertain, one thing is not: To maintain the nation’s leadership in science and technology discovery, we must create an approach to science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) education that prepares and advances the U.S. for this future. Experts agree that science, technology, engineering and math will drive new innovations across disciplines, making use of computational power to accelerate discoveries and finding creative ways to work across disciplinary silos to solve big challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Framework to Reinforce Evidence Synthesis Features in Cloud-Based Systematic Review Tools
    applied sciences Article A Comprehensive Framework to Reinforce Evidence Synthesis Features in Cloud-Based Systematic Review Tools Tatiana Person 1,* , Iván Ruiz-Rube 1 , José Miguel Mota 1 , Manuel Jesús Cobo 1 , Alexey Tselykh 2 and Juan Manuel Dodero 1 1 Department of Informatics Engineering, University of Cadiz, 11519 Puerto Real, Spain; ivan.ruiz@uca.es (I.R.-R.); josemiguel.mota@uca.es (J.M.M.); manuel.cobo@uca.es (M.J.C.); juanma.dodero@uca.es (J.M.D.) 2 Department of Information and Analytical Security Systems, Institute of Computer Technologies and Information Security, Southern Federal University, 347922 Taganrog, Russia; tselykh@sfedu.ru * Correspondence: tatiana.person@uca.es Abstract: Systematic reviews are powerful methods used to determine the state-of-the-art in a given field from existing studies and literature. They are critical but time-consuming in research and decision making for various disciplines. When conducting a review, a large volume of data is usually generated from relevant studies. Computer-based tools are often used to manage such data and to support the systematic review process. This paper describes a comprehensive analysis to gather the required features of a systematic review tool, in order to support the complete evidence synthesis process. We propose a framework, elaborated by consulting experts in different knowledge areas, to evaluate significant features and thus reinforce existing tool capabilities. The framework will be used to enhance the currently available functionality of CloudSERA, a cloud-based systematic review Citation: Person, T.; Ruiz-Rube, I.; Mota, J.M.; Cobo, M.J.; Tselykh, A.; tool focused on Computer Science, to implement evidence-based systematic review processes in Dodero, J.M.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mixed Methods Bibliometric Study
    The Qualitative Report Volume 24 Number 12 Article 2 12-2-2019 Collaboration Patterns as a Function of Research Experience Among Mixed Researchers: A Mixed Methods Bibliometric Study Melanie S. Wachsmann Sam Houston State University, msw010@SHSU.EDU Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie Sam Houston State University, tonyonwuegbuzie@aol.com Susan Hoisington Sam Houston State University, stdsrh31@SHSU.EDU Vanessa Gonzales Sam Houston State University, STDVMM14@SHSU.EDU Rachael Wilcox Sam Houston State University, rmw017@shsu.edu See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr Part of the Education Commons, Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies Commons, and the Social Statistics Commons Recommended APA Citation Wachsmann, M. S., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Hoisington, S., Gonzales, V., Wilcox, R., Valle, R., & Aleisa, M. (2019). Collaboration Patterns as a Function of Research Experience Among Mixed Researchers: A Mixed Methods Bibliometric Study. The Qualitative Report, 24(12), 2954-2979. https://doi.org/10.46743/ 2160-3715/2019.3852 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the The Qualitative Report at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Qualitative Report by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact nsuworks@nova.edu. Collaboration Patterns as a Function of Research Experience Among Mixed Researchers: A Mixed Methods Bibliometric Study Abstract Onwuegbuzie et al. (2018) documented that the degree of collaboration is higher for mixed researchers than for qualitative and quantitative researchers. The present investigation examined the (a) link between the research experience of lead authors and their propensity to collaborate (Quantitative Phase), and (b) role of research experience in collaborative mixed research studies (Qualitative Phase).
    [Show full text]
  • The Privilege to Select. Global Research System, European Academic Library Collections, and Decolonisation
    The Privilege to Select Global Research System, European Academic Library Collections, and Decolonisation Schmidt, Nora DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4011296 2020 Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Schmidt, N. (2020). The Privilege to Select: Global Research System, European Academic Library Collections, and Decolonisation. Lund University, Faculties of Humanities and Theology. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4011296 Total number of authors: 1 Creative Commons License: CC BY General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 Download date: 06. Oct. 2021 The Privilege to Select To European social sciences and humanities researchers, substantial parts of potentially relevant literature published in the “Global South” are invisible.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientometrics1
    Scientometrics1 Loet Leydesdorff a and Staša Milojević b a Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam, Kloveniersburgwal 48, 1012 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; loet@leydesdorff.net b School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405-1901, United States; smilojev@indiana.edu. Abstract The paper provides an overview of the field of scientometrics, that is: the study of science, technology, and innovation from a quantitative perspective. We cover major historical milestones in the development of this specialism from the 1960s to today and discuss its relationship with the sociology of scientific knowledge, the library and information sciences, and science policy issues such as indicator development. The disciplinary organization of scientometrics is analyzed both conceptually and empirically. A state-of-the-art review of five major research threads is provided. Keywords: scientometrics, bibliometrics, citation, indicator, impact, library, science policy, research management, sociology of science, science studies, mapping, visualization Cross References: Communication: Electronic Networks and Publications; History of Science; Libraries; Networks, Social; Merton, Robert K.; Peer Review and Quality Control; Science and Technology, Social Study of: Computers and Information Technology; Science and Technology Studies: Experts and Expertise; Social network algorithms and software; Statistical Models for Social Networks, Overview; 1 Forthcoming in: Micheal Lynch (Editor), International
    [Show full text]
  • Oecd Work on S&T Indicators and the Interest In
    OECD WORK ON S&T INDICATORS AND THE INTEREST IN SCIENTOMETRICS OECD – Experts dialogue, 25 March 2014 Fernando Galindo-Rueda Economic Analysis and Statistics Division OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry The OECD context • International organisation. – “Better policies for better lives”. – 34 member countries, broader engagement – Secretary General, Council of Ambassadors, Secretariat and thematic Committees and working parties which oversee work • Types of outputs – Policy recommendations – Standards, rules, … – Policy relevant evidence and statistics, often co- produced with countries’ authorities – Policy analysis, qualitative and quantitative Background on S&T indicator work • Work on S&T indicators dating back to 1960s – Formalisation of guidelines on measuring R&D efforts (expenditure and personnel): • The Frascati Manual, 1963 – being revised for 6th time • Collection and dissemination of data: – Extended to work on human resources for S&T, technology balance of payments, innovation in firms, patents, … • Measurement work at OECD focused on data sources “controlled” by public authorities participating in OECD fora – Brief interest in mid 1990s in bibliometrics – “methods” working paper but no guidelines. Scientometrics at OECD • Since 2010, increasing use of bibliometric indicators in OECD flagship publications on S&T – For example, see hyperlinks in agenda. • Microdata-based approach promoted in 2010 OECD Innovation Strategy. – Promotion of microdata use and linking within countries. Approach of cross-country co-ordinated analyses. – In-house use of microdata under license (Elsevier) within OECD Micro-Data Lab. • As part of building a broader, linked microdata infrastructure. • OECD MDL brings together different administrative and public data sources. • Collaborations with external organisations – NISTEP, Scimago, MCT-Brazil and JSTA.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download Starting with Science Strategies for Introducing Young Children to Inquiry 1St Edition Ebook
    STARTING WITH SCIENCE STRATEGIES FOR INTRODUCING YOUNG CHILDREN TO INQUIRY 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Marcia Talhelm Edson | 9781571108074 | | | | | Starting with Science Strategies for Introducing Young Children to Inquiry 1st edition PDF Book The presentation of the material is as good as the material utilizing star trek analogies, ancient wisdom and literature and so much more. Using Multivariate Statistics. Michael Gramling examines the impact of policy on practice in early childhood education. Part of a series on. Schauble and colleagues , for example, found that fifth grade students designed better experiments after instruction about the purpose of experimentation. For example, some suggest that learning about NoS enables children to understand the tentative and developmental NoS and science as a human activity, which makes science more interesting for children to learn Abd-El-Khalick a ; Driver et al. Research on teaching and learning of nature of science. The authors begin with theory in a cultural context as a foundation. What makes professional development effective? Frequently, the term NoS is utilised when considering matters about science. This book is a documentary account of a young intern who worked in the Reggio system in Italy and how she brought this pedagogy home to her school in St. Taking Science to School answers such questions as:. The content of the inquiries in science in the professional development programme was based on the different strands of the primary science curriculum, namely Living Things, Energy and Forces, Materials and Environmental Awareness and Care DES Exit interview. Begin to address the necessity of understanding other usually peer positions before they can discuss or comment on those positions.
    [Show full text]
  • 9. the Rhetoric, Science, and Technology of 21St Century Collaboration
    9. The Rhetoric, Science, and Technology of 21st Century Collaboration Ann Hill Duin University of Minnesota Jason Tham Texas Tech University Isabel Pedersen Ontario Tech University Abstract: We contend that collaboration is an imperative disciplinary as- sumption in technical and professional communication (TPC). Theorists, researchers, and practitioners grapple with ever-changing modes and models for collaborative work in academia, industry, and with communities. Tech- nical and professional communicators today must be prepared to collaborate with engineers, subject matter experts, and programmers; they must be adept at using collaborative software and working with global virtual teams. The purpose of this chapter is to synthesize the rhetoric, science, and technology of collaboration to consolidate a guiding framework for understanding, teaching, and practicing TPC collaboration in the 21st century and beyond. This unified framework provides guidance from which to structure one’s own collaboration and the collaborative projects we assign throughout our curriculum. We discuss collaborative software and team communication platforms and share example projects for preparing students for collaborative and global workplaces. Keywords: collaboration, rhetoric, technology, platforms, global virtual teams Key Takeaways: Collaboration across local and global contexts is an imperative disciplinary assumption in technical and professional communication (TPC). TPC instructors must prepare students for the collaborative frameworks and tools that
    [Show full text]
  • GLOCAL Ization and Sustainability of Science Education Research And
    e c i t c a r P d n a h c r a e s e R n o i t a c u d E e c n e i c S f o y it il b a in ta s u S d an n io at Liz CA GLO 11130 Sunrise Valley Drive | Suite 350 | Reston, Virginia 20191 | USA www.narst.org | info@narst.org | 703.234.4138 | fax 703.435.4390 Saturday, April 22, 2017 NARST 2017 Annual International Conference Abstracts Pre-Conference Workshop #1: Equity and Ethics Committee (Free – 90 participants max) Glocalization and Sustainability of Science Education Research and Practice 8:00am – 11:45am, Hyatt Lone Star F Organizers: Enrique Lopez Nam-Hwa Kang Tasneem Anwar Senetta Bancroft Phillip Boda Tamra-Kay Alisa Francis Deniz Saribas Azam Saiqa Sheron Mark, University of Louisville ABSTRACT: Globalization and sustainability in science education has increasingly received attention among educators, researchers, and policymakers. Cultivating a scientifically literate citizenry has been tied to the concepts of globalization and sustainability. As highlighted in NARST’s conference theme description, glocalization represents a dual perspective which combines the ideals of globalization with the importance of localization. Pre-conference workshop participants will engage in constructive and meaningful dialogue with leading science education scholars about the influences of glocalization on educators, researchers, and policymakers’ efforts to build and sustain scientific literacy within local contexts for a global citizenry. Through an equity and ethics lens, this workshop will pay special attention to understanding the concepts of glocalization, sustainability, and scientific literacy; exploring how these concepts have been used within science education practice, research, and policy; and critiquing the benefits and limitations glocalization and sustainability offer the science education community.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 4 (2018), 386-407 DOI:10.17351/ests2018.228 Challenging Power, Constructing Boundaries, and Confronting Anxieties: Michael Kattirtzi Talks with Andrew Stirling MICHAEL KATTIRTZI1 UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH ANDREW STIRLING2 UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX Abstract In this interview, Andy Stirling talks to Michael Kattirtzi about what initially drew him to Science and Technology Studies, his account of the impact of the Science Wars on the field, and why it matters that STS researchers do not shy away from challenging incumbents. Through a series of thoughtful reflections on his encounters with STS researchers, Stirling arrives at the conclusion that we should not expect the field to reconcile tensions that are more deeply rooted in society. Nonetheless, he hopes that in the future STS researchers will be more open and admitting of a plurality of epistemic perspectives within the field and avoid overly constraining it––all the while as he continues to demonstrate the value of appreciating such epistemic pluralism to policy- makers and stakeholders. A reflection by Michael Kattirtzi follows the interview. Keywords interview; Andy Stirling; epistemic diversity; normative commitments; disciplines; reflexivity First Encounters MK Let’s start with your own involvement with Science and Technology Studies, and your own sort of background––I know you remember your time in Edinburgh fondly. AS It was a formative experience for me––one of the most galvanizing of my intellectual life. Actually also my personal life, because it was in the Science Studies Unit (SSU) that I met my partner, Topsy Jewell (who was studying science studies with zoology). But I only had a small exposure to the SSU compared to other people you’ll be interviewing, because I was just an undergraduate.
    [Show full text]
  • Econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Stör, Lorenz Working Paper Conceptualizing power in the context of climate change: A multi-theoretical perspective on structure, agency & power relations VÖÖ Discussion Paper, No. 5/2017 Provided in Cooperation with: Vereinigung für Ökologische Ökonomie e.V. (VÖÖ), Heidelberg Suggested Citation: Stör, Lorenz (2017) : Conceptualizing power in the context of climate change: A multi-theoretical perspective on structure, agency & power relations, VÖÖ Discussion Paper, No. 5/2017, Vereinigung für Ökologische Ökonomie (VÖÖ), Heidelberg This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/150540 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ www.econstor.eu VÖÖ Discussion Papers VÖÖ Discussion Papers · ISSN 2366-7753 No.
    [Show full text]