REALITY of PAKISTAN's COUNTER AIR STRIKE of 27 FEB 2019 A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

REALITY of PAKISTAN's COUNTER AIR STRIKE of 27 FEB 2019 A REALITY OF PAKISTAN’s COUNTER AIR STRIKE OF 27 FEB 2019 A DEMONSTRATION THAT FAILED BY GP CAPT GD SHARMA, VSM (RETD), SENIOR FELLOW CENJOWS Prologue 1. After 14 Feb 19 Pulwama Suicide attack by a Jaish-e- Mohammed (JeM) operative in which 40 CRPF troops lost their lives, Indian Government promised retribution at a time of its choosing. Pakistan expecting a major retaliation by the Indian forces mobilised its troops along the Eastern border/ LoC. Indian Air Force with a daring predawn pre-emptive Miarge 2000 strike achieved a tactical surprise by hitting at Balakot beyond Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (POK), one of its major terrorist training camp in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, located nearly 70+ km from Line of Control (LoC). Pakistan retaliated the very next day (27 Feb 19) between 0900- 1000 hrs with a massive air strike with reported 20+aircraft. The strikes were estimated to comprise eleven F16 ac and balance Mirage III/Vs and JF 17s. The Pak counter strike was unexpectedly early but, it did not catch the Indian air defences unaware, as forces were on high state alert after Pulwama attack. In fact, Pakistani response too was expected after its military and political leadership repeatedly told that it too would respond if India acts militarily in response to 14 Feb JeM suicide mission at Pulwama. 2. Possibly some constituents of the strike (three F16s) violated the Indian Air Space by 7 -10km in Rajouri/Naushera area of Jammu and Kashmir and were intercepted by a Bison air defence CAP ex Srinagar. In the ensuing air combat, one Bison flown by Wg Cdr Abhinandan Varthman shot down an F 16 and then ejected with in Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (PoK) after his own aircraft was hit by Pakistani fire. He was repatriated from Atari Indo- Pak border after two days despite stiff local opposition. Ignoring the opposition, Pakistani PM announced the repatriation of Wg Cdr Abhnandan in Pakistani Parliament as a peace gesture Some Questions. 3. Pakistani Air strike during the morning hours on 27 Feb 2019 have raised some questions which need detailed examination:- (a) Whether Pak air strike on the very next day after Indian Pre-emptive air strike at Balakot on 26 Feb 19 was really an answer to Indian bold strike as it failed to damage any installation/ facility on the Indian side and even lost its F-16 a superior aircraft to a third generation Bison? (b) What was the objective of Pakistani strike mission? Did it achieve it? (c) Why was strike planned the very next day (27 Feb 19) between 0900- 1000h at medium level? (d) Why did Pakistan repatriate Wg Cdr Abhinandan Varthman without extracting any advantage in return opposing a local clamour for the retribution? Prevailing Environment Then! 4. One needs to consider the rightness of Pakistan response in the light of the prevailing environment which severely limited Pakistani capability to respond:- (a) Tough Stance of Indian Leadership. Indian leadership vowed to respond to Pulwama strike at an appropriate time. Accordingly, both Indian and Pakistani armed Forces were expected to be on a high state alert after the Pulwama attack. (b) Pakistan in Severe Economic Crunch. Facing severe economic crunch Pakistan could ill afford any military escalation with India. Along with the mounting debts, ,the country’s foreign reserves had fallen to USD 8.12 billion, which was below the minimum level that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank (WB) prescribe and reserve was just sufficient for seven weeks of imports. Prime Minister Imran Khan visited China, Saudi Arabia and the UAE to arrange emergency loans to avoid a looming loan default. Pakistan has secured cumulative USD 14.5 billion worth of commitments from these three countries.1 (c) Pakistani Leadership’s Deceptive Card. Pakistan was anxious about the possibility of Indian military response to Pulwama terror strike as before. Its leadership repeatedly warned India of escalation and that it would positively respond to Indian strike if any. (d) International Consensus on Terrorism. Of late there is consensus internationally against terrorism and Pakistan’s role as sponsor of terror. Financial Action Task force (FATF) a non-official grouping has kept Pakistan in Grey list and on notice of being black listed unless it does substantial to curb terrorism. Hence, Pakistan is eager to show some positive action in this regard lest it will create difficulty in procuring future loans from international monetary bodies such as IMF and World Bank. (e) India’s Right of Self Defence. India had expressed its resolve to act against the terror in conformity to its right of self defence under the UN Charter. US, France and Israel supported India’s right of self-defence. China and Russia too showed understanding of the Indian concern but, were non- committal in response. (f) Will Pakistan Abandon its Unconventional War? Despite being internationally isolated to the issue of terrorism, Pakistan still seems in no mood to abandon its unconventional war of bleeding India and Its PM Imran Khan and his government let it known of their continued support to the Kashmir terrorism. (g) No More Strategic Restraint. After 2016 Uri attack, India has shed its policy of strategic restraint and is now following a new norm of zero tolerance to terror and would respond to the terror groups even in Pakistan if attacked. After IAF Balakot strike, the reality of new norm has probably sunk in mind of Pakistani leadership. Hopefully, this will result in deterring them from being sponsor of Kashmiri terrorism. Pakistani Response on 27 Feb 19. 5. Was Pakistan in Position to Escalate? From the foregoing circumstances it quite clearly establishes that Pakistan was not in position to escalate and risk any armed conflict with India .Its leadership repeatedly told Indian leadership to desist from taking any provocative action after the Pulwama attack, or else Pakistan would have no option but to escalate and respond. The main reason for this was 1https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/business/china-to-provide-usd-2-5- billion-loan-to-pakistan-to-boost-foreign-cash-reserves/articleshow/67805085.cms the impression created by Pakistani army amongst its gullible masses of its strength and invincibility. It therefore wanted to avoid landing in an irretrievable situation of proving its strength. It is for this reason Pakistan never admitted to the occurrence of the 2016 surgical strike. 6. Failed Demonstration! On the morning of 27 Feb 19, just one day later than pre-emptive Indian strike on the JeM training camp, Pakistan Air Force(PAF) launched massive air strikes in three packages between 0900h to 1000h. As emerged from the IAF media briefing and open source material that strikes were estimated to comprise 20+ aircraft with 11 F16’s , rest Mirage III’s /V’s and JF 17’s. Here again it deceived its masses. It tried to mis-represent that it carried out a most audacious strike on Indian positions. But the reality was that the strike was executed at the medium level (height band reported in the media 7000’-10000’). Then, only three F-16 from the package of 11 F-16 ac violated Indian air space in Rajouri/ Naushera sector and were challenged by a Indian air defence CAPs of Bison (upgraded MiG 21) and pair of SU30’s. F-16’ were chased by a pair of Bison and the Pakistani returned with minus one F-16 which was shot down by one lower generation Bison. 7. F-16’s failed to deliver their arsenal (Laser guided bombs) at any of the target of significance which was just ejected in open areas in the vicinity of army installations. Other F-16’s from the package stayed on their side in Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (POK) and are known to have fired several Advance Medium Range Air to Air Missiles (AMRAAM) Beyond visual range missiles but, all except the one which probably hit Bison flown by Wg Cdr Varthman, missed their mark. F- 16’s fearing Indian SU30’s never ventured to violate the LOC. They fired AMRAAM from the maximum ranges and were made ineffective by evasive manoeuvring of SU 30’s and their use of Electronic Counter Counter measures (ECCM). 8. The other two packages comprising Mirage III and Mirage V and JF 17’s on being challenged by Indian Mirage 2000 pair, also stayed with in Pakistan air space/POK and turned back without carrying out any significant activity. Indian Response to Pakistani Air Strike. 9. A Muscular Response. After the Pulwama attack Indian armed forces in the sector opposite Pakistan/ POK were on high alert with Bison air borne CAP at Srinagar and SU30 CAP in the general area East of Jammu. All Air Defence sensors and AWACS were maintaining a heighted watch for any misadventure from Pakistan. Pakistani strike at medium level was picked up by sensors with warning time of 10 -12 min. This early warning gave an opportunity to Indian air defences to react appropriately which resulted in a successful interception of F-16’s. In all, IAF scrambled 6 Bison aircraft four SU30’s and two Mirage 2000 ac. ANALYSIS Pakistan’s Primary Objective. 10. Why Pakistan Responded the Very Next Day of Indian Strike? It appears that Pakistan did not want escalation of the situation with India. Firstly, they could ill afford any armed conflict with the economic crunch faced by them. Secondly, Pakistan is aware that they are no match to India in the conventional conflict but were encouraged by false bravado and with intention to misguide their masses, the strike was launched as demonstration of will and not to attack Indian military and civil assets.
Recommended publications
  • Responsible for Deaths of Involvement in Major Terrorist Attacks Designation Hafiz Mohammed Saeed, Amir, Lashkar-E-Taiba And
    Responsible Involvement in major terrorist Designation for deaths of attacks . January 1998 Wandhama . Declared as terrorist by India under massacre (23) the amended Unlawful Activities . March 2000 Chittisinghpura (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in Hafiz Mohammed 625 people massacre (35) September 2019; Saeed, Amir, . December 2000 Red Fort attack . Designated as a global terrorist by Lashkar-e-Taiba (3) the UN in December 2008; and Jamaat-ud- . May 2002 Kaluchak massacre . Designated by the US Treasury in Daawa (31) May 2008; . March 2003 Nandimarg . Carries reward up to $10 million massacre (24) from the US Government. Zaki-ur-Rahman . October 2005 Delhi Diwali blasts . Declared as terrorist by India under Lakhvi, (62) the amended UAPA in September Operational . March 2006 Varanasi blasts (28) 2019; Commander, . April 2006 Doda massacre (34) . Designated as a global terrorist by Lashkar-e-Taiba . July 2006 Mumbai train blasts the UN in December 2008; (211) . Designated by the US Treasury in . January 2008 Rampur CRPF May 2008. camp attack (8) . November 2008 Mumbai attack (166) Masood Azhar, 125 people . October 2001 Srinagar Assembly . Declared as terrorist under the Amir, Jaish-e- attack (38) December 2001 amended UAPA in September 2019; Mohammed Parliament attack (9) . Designated by the UN as a global . January 2016 Pathankot attack terrorist in May 2019; (7) . Designated by the US Treasury in . September 2016 Uri attack (19) November 2010. October 2017 Humhama BSF camp attack (1) . December 2017 Lethpora CRPF camp attack (4) . February 2018 Sunjawan attack (7) . February 2019 Lethpora suicide attack (40) Dawood Ibrahim 257 people March 1993 Mumbai serial blasts .
    [Show full text]
  • Kashmir: January 2019 by Jon Lunn
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 7356, 2 January 2019 Kashmir: January 2019 By Jon Lunn update Contents: 1. 2016: The killing of Burhan Wani triggers renewed violence 2. Developments during 2017 3. Developments during 2018 4. Low-key response from Western governments 5. Impasse without end? www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Kashmir: January 2019 update Contents Summary 4 1. 2016: The killing of Burhan Wani triggers renewed violence 6 Protests, strikes and curfews 6 Response of the Indian Government 6 Flaring up of tension between India and Pakistan 7 2. Developments during 2017 8 2017 the deadliest year since 2010 8 Main flashpoints and incidents 8 3. Developments during 2018 10 2018 more violent than 2017 10 Flashpoints and incidents 10 Deepening political crisis 12 4. Responses of Western governments and the UN 13 US response 13 UK response 13 EU response 14 UN response 14 5. Conclusion: impasse without end? 15 3 Commons Library Briefing, 2 January 2019 Cover page image copyright: Indian Army Act on Kashmiris by Usama302. Wikimedia Commons Licensed by CC BY 4.0 / image cropped. 4 Kashmir: January 2019 update Summary This briefing covers events in Indian-administered Kashmir since July 2016, which have been characterised by a dramatic upsurge in protest and violence on the ground – what some have called the “worst crisis in a generation”. On 8 July 2016, Burhan Wani, a 22-year-old leader of the armed group Hizbul Mujahedin, was killed by the Indian security forces. Following Wani’s death, the Kashmir Valley saw its biggest outbreak of protest and violence since 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the SUPREME COURT of INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRL) NO. of 2019 in the MATTER OF: Vineet Dhand
    Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRL) NO. OF 2019 IN THE MATTER OF: Vineet Dhanda Petitioner VERSUS Union of India &Ors. Respondents PAPER BOOK [FOR INDEX KINDLY SEE INSIDE] DR. J.P.DHANDA: ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) INDEX Sl. Particulars of Document Page No. of Part to Rema No. which it belongs rks Part 1 Part II (Contents (Contents of Paper of file Book) alone) (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) 1. Court Fees 2. Listing Proforma A-A1 A-A1 3. Cover Page of Paper Book A-3 4. Index of Record of A-4 Proceedings 5. Limitation Report prepared A-5 by the Registry 6. Defect List A-6 7. Note Sheet NS1 to 8. List of Dates B-Z 9. Writ Petition with Affidavit 1-59 10. Annexure P-1: 60-62 A copy of the news article dated 26.11.2012 published in Rediff News.com 11. Annexure P-2: 63-67 A copy of the news article of Times of India dated 10.08.2015 Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) 12. Annexure P-3: 68-77 A copy of the detailed Wikipedia regarding the Uri attack dt. Nil 2016 13. Annexure P-4: 78-87 A copy of the detailed Wikipedia regarding the All Partied Hurriyat Conference dt. Nil 14. Annexure P-5: 88-90 A copy of the news article published in Business Standard dated 29.11.2017 15. Annexure P-6: 91-95 A copy of the news article published Press Trust of India dated nil January 2018 16.
    [Show full text]
  • From Burhan Wani to Abhi Nandan: a Comparative Analysis of India And
    Article 41 FromNUST Burhan Journal Waniof International to Abhi NUST Journal of International Nandan: A ComparativePeace & Stability Peace & Stability Analysis2020, Vol. of IndiaIII (1) Pagesand Pakistan’s41-58 2020, Vol. III (1) Pages 41-58 njips.nust.edu.pk njips.nust.edu.pk Newspaper Coverage of Kashmir Conflict Ajmal Khan1 Azmat Khan2 Abstract This paper compares the coverage of Kashmir Conflict in four English language dailies: two from Pakistan; DAWN and The Nation, and two from India; ‘The HINDU’ and ‘Times of India’ by employing Galtung’s Model of Peace Journalism (Galtung, 1986; 1998) and Lynch & McGoldrick’s (2005) Two-Sided Conflict Model. The study pursues two research questions; is the coverage of these newspaper war or peace- oriented, and do they report Kashmir Conflict through Two-Party (Pak-India) or Multi- Party lenses. For data sources, seven major recent events; Burhan Wani’s killing (2016), Uri Attack, Indian Surgical Strikes, Pulwama Attack, Balakot Airstrike, and Abhi Nandan’s Capture and Release (2019) were chosen. A total of 56 stories, one lead story and one editorial from each newspaper about every event, were collected. Each story was evaluated according to Galtung’s 19 indicators; nine War, nine Peace and one Neutral, and accordingly categorized. The analysis revealed that DAWN had the highest (46.15%) peace-oriented coverage while The HINDU was second with only 23% peace content. In the war category, The Nation scored the highest (100%) while the Times of India was found second (92.85%). No story could qualify for the neutral category. Overall, the coverage of these newspapers was found grossly (81.13%) war- oriented.
    [Show full text]
  • Idrees & Khanum Rise of Violent Hindu
    Aslam, Iqbal, & Hussain Internal & External Dynamics of Gilgit-Baltistan INTERNAL & EXTERNAL DYNAMICS OF GILGIT-BALTISTAN: PROSPECTS AND CHALLENGES FOR CHINA PAKISTAN ECONOMIC CORRIDOR Fawad Aslam,1 Khuram Iqbal,2 & Mujahid Hussain3 Abstract: The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is presently a subject of geopolitical and regional security discourse. Gilgit-Baltistan is at a crossroads of the CPEC project due to its strategic importance. However, this region has received global attention due to an international territorial dispute over Kashmir with India, undeclared constitutional status, and sectarian conflicts that plunged this region into a conflict zone. To examine the ambiguity of the constitutional status of Gilgit- Baltistan and the presence of infrastructural changes in the region, the researchers adopted the Process Tracking method which proposes a hypothesized causal mechanism and pays attention to changes that have taken place over time. This study finds out how the sectarian, religious, and nationalist dynamics of Gilgit-Baltistan and Kashmir as a strategic constraint of the government of Pakistan for the legal status of Gilgit-Baltistan? It also discusses growing Chinese interest, particularly the CPEC, and Indian coercive response to this project, accentuate the Pakistani government to deal with the Gilgit-Baltistan constitutional complaints. The study concludes that constitutional status effects the region's ability to participate in and benefit from CPEC. Key Words: CPEC, constitutional status, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pulwama, sectarianism, geopolitics. INTRODUCTION Gilgit-Baltistan is at a crossroads of the CPEC project due to its strategic location. Gilgit-Baltistan is considered as Northern Gwadar of Pakistan, located between the border of Indian Kashmir to the southeast, Xinjiang province of China to the east and northeast, and the Wakhan Corridor of Afghanistan to the north and connecting Pakistan with another province through the west of Khayber Pakhtunkhwa.
    [Show full text]
  • SAMEEP Student and MEA Engagement Programme
    India and her neighbours India places neighborhood engagement at the heart of its foreign policy Till our Borders are Secure, we cannot Emerge as a Power of importance to the world Afghanistan Helping in stabilizing Nepal & Bhutan Development assistance, hydro electricity Pakistan Protracted conflict Over Kashmir issue Myanmar Gateway to ASEAN Bangladesh Assistance, connectivity Sri Lanka Maritime ties Maldives Maritime security, climate change impacts There is no Permanent Friend and permanent Enemy. There is only permanent interest Neighbourhood First Political and diplomatic priority to its immediate neighbours and the Indian Ocean island states Provide neighbours with support, as needed, in the form of resources, equipment, and training. Greater connectivity and integration, so as to improve the free flow of goods, people, energy, capital, and information. India has also become more forthcoming in providing support and in capacity building, including providing humanitarian assistance to Nepal or Sri Lanka. With Bangladesh, the completion of the Land Boundary Agreement, improvements in energy connectivity and steps taken towards accessing the port of Chittagong have all been crucial developments. India’s focus on connectivity is also gradually extending outward, whether to Chabahar in Iran or Kaladan in Myanmar. India has also expressed its willingness to develop issue-specific groupings that are not held hostage to consensus. For example Bangladesh-Bhutan-India-Nepal (BBIN) grouping – meant to advance motor vehicle movement, water power management, and inter- grid connectivity With respect to all of its neighbours, including Nepal, India has taken concrete steps over the past two years to promote goodwill and deepen economic and social connectivity Terrorism emanating against India by entities based in neighbourhood and supported by elements of the state remains a top priority.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTICLE 370 As in the Constitution of India
    ARTICLE 370 as in the Constitution of India Note - Clause (2) and Clause (3) can be referred to for further knowledge of the context but main discussion will revolve around the provisions of Clause (1) only. 370. Temporary provisions with respect to the State of Jammu and Kashmir (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Constitution,— ​ (a) the provisions of article 238 shall not apply now in relation to the state of Jammu and Kashmir; (b) the power of Parliament to make laws for the said state shall be limited to— (i) those matters in the Union List and the Concurrent List which, in consultation ​ ​ ​ ​ with the Government of the State, are declared by the President to correspond to ​ ​ ​ ​ matters specified in the Instrument of Accession governing the accession of the ​ ​ State to the Dominion of India as the matters with respect to which the Dominion ​ ​ Legislature may make laws for that State; and (ii) such other matters in the said Lists as, with the concurrence of the Government of the State, the President may by order specify. Explanation: For the purpose of this article, the Government of the State means the ​ person for the time being recognized by the President on the recommendation of the Legislative Assembly of the State as the Sadr-i-Riyasat (now Governor) of ​ ​ ​ ​ Jammu and Kashmir, acting on the advice of the Council of Ministers of the State for the time being in office. (c) the provisions of article 1 and of this article shall apply in relation to that State; (d) such of the other provisions of this Constitution
    [Show full text]
  • South Asia's Lessons, Evolving Dynamics, and Trajectories
    South Asia’s Lessons, Evolving Dynamics, and Trajectories Edited by Sameer Lalwani and Hannah Haegeland South Asia’s Lessons, Evolving Dynamics, and Trajectories Edited by Sameer Lalwani and Hannah Haegeland JANUARY 2018  © Copyright 2018 by the Stimson Center. All rights reserved. Printed in Washington, D.C. ISBN 978-0-9997659-0-6 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017919496 Stimson Center 1211 Connecticut Avenue, NW 8th Floor Washington, D.C. 20036 U.S.A. Visit www.stimson.org for more information about Stimson’s research. Investigating Crises: South Asia’s Lessons, Evolving Dynamics, and Trajectories CONTENTS Preface . 7 Key Terms and Acronyms . 9 Introduction . 11 Sameer Lalwani Anatomy of a Crisis: Explaining Crisis Onset in India-Pakistan Relations . 23 Sameer Lalwani & Hannah Haegeland Organizing for Crisis Management: Evaluating India’s Experience in Three Case Studies . .57 Shyam Saran Conflict Resolution and Crisis Management: Challenges in Pakistan-India Relations . 75 Riaz Mohammad Khan Intelligence, Strategic Assessment, and Decision Process Deficits: The Absence of Indian Learning from Crisis to Crisis . 97 Saikat Datta Self-Referencing the News: Media, Policymaking, and Public Opinion in India-Pakistan Crises . 115 Ruhee Neog Crisis Management in Nuclear South Asia: A Pakistani Perspective . 143 Zafar Khan China and Crisis Management in South Asia . 165 Yun Sun & Hannah Haegeland Crisis Intensity and Nuclear Signaling in South Asia . 187 Michael Krepon & Liv Dowling New Horizons, New Risks: A Scenario-based Approach to Thinking about the Future of Crisis Stability in South Asia . 221 Iskander Rehman New Challenges for Crisis Management . 251 Michael Krepon Contributors . 265 Contents 6 PREFACE With gratitude and pride I present Stimson’s latest South Asia Program book, Investigating Crises: South Asia’s Lessons, Evolving Dynamics, and Trajectories.
    [Show full text]
  • Globalizing Pakistani Identity Across the Border: the Politics of Crossover Stardom in the Hindi Film Industry
    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Communication Master of Arts Theses College of Communication Winter 3-19-2018 Globalizing Pakistani Identity Across The Border: The Politics of Crossover Stardom in the Hindi Film Industry Dina Khdair DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/cmnt Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Khdair, Dina, "Globalizing Pakistani Identity Across The Border: The Politics of Crossover Stardom in the Hindi Film Industry" (2018). College of Communication Master of Arts Theses. 31. https://via.library.depaul.edu/cmnt/31 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Communication at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Communication Master of Arts Theses by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GLOBALIZING PAKISTANI IDENTITY ACROSS THE BORDER: THE POLITICS OF CROSSOVER STARDOM IN THE HINDI FILM INDUSTRY INTRODUCTION In 2010, Pakistani musician and actor Ali Zafar noted how “films and music are one of the greatest tools of bringing in peace and harmony between India and Pakistan. As both countries share a common passion – films and music can bridge the difference between the two.”1 In a more recent interview from May 2016, Zafar reflects on the unprecedented success of his career in India, celebrating his work in cinema as groundbreaking and forecasting a bright future for Indo-Pak collaborations in entertainment and culture.2 His optimism is signaled by a wish to reach an even larger global fan base, as he mentions his dream of working in Hollywood and joining other Indian émigré stars like Priyanka Chopra.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Integration and Liberal Economic Order in SAARC: a Case Study of Trade Relations Between Pakistan and India Under SAFTA Regime (1997-2015)
    Regional Integration and Liberal Economic order in SAARC: A Case Study of Trade Relations between Pakistan and India under SAFTA Regime (1997-2015) Sarfraz Batool Ph.D. (Political Science) Roll No. 04 Session: 2013-2018 Supervisor Prof. Dr. UMBREEN JAVAID Department of Political Science University of the Punjab Lahore. i Regional Integration and Liberal Economic order in SAARC: A Case Study of Trade Relations between Pakistan and India under SAFTA Regime (1997-2015) This thesis is submitted in Partial fulfilment of Ph.D. in Political Science, University of the Punjab, Lahore. Session 2013 – 2018 Supervisor Prof. Dr. Umbreen Javaid Chairperson Department of Political Science Submitted by Sarfraz Batool Ph.D. (Political Science) Roll No. 04 Session: 2013-2018 ii DEDICATION I dedicate my thesis to my loving mother and caring husband, without their support and encouragement I could not have completed this thesis. I also dedicate this work to the golden memories of my late father. May his soul rest in peace forever. Ameen iii DECLARATION I hereby declare that this thesis is the result of my individual research and I have not submitted this thesis concurrently to any other University or Institute for any other degree whatsoever Sarfraz Batool iv Certificate of Approval It is certified that this Ph.D. Thesis submitted by Sarfraz Batool on the topic of ―Regional Integration and Liberal Economic order in SAARC: A Case Study of Trade Relations between Pakistan and India under SAFTA Regime (1997-2015)” is an original work and result of her own efforts. In assessment of the ‗Examining Committee‘, this thesis is of sufficient standard to warrant the acceptance by the Department of Political Science, University of the Punjab, Lahore for the award of Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • HM 28 OCTOBER Page 9.Qxd
    JAMMU WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 28, 2020 9 FROM PAGE ONE the supply of arms, ammunition and hand grenades. corruption. (264 are active, 1,940 have recovered, 22 have died). Panchayats to get computers, inter- "Fighting corruption is not a job of a single agency but is a col- LG sanctions over 10,000 cases under B2V3, Eco In the valley, Srinagar district today recorded 118 cases, lective responsibility," Modi said after inaugurating the na- Baramulla - 47, Kulgam - 0, Shopian - 1, Anantnag - 6, Kupwara net connectivity Package, My Town My Pride progs tional conference on vigilance and anti-corruption. bodies will also be equipped with internet facility enabling - 9, Pulwama - 24, Budgam - 22, Bandipora - 13 and Ganderbal Peace, Progress, Prosperity and People first. "The sanction- The three-day conference, inaugurated via video conference them to work in an efficient and transparent manner. - 18. ing of over 10,000 cases under B2V3 self-employment pro- on Tuesday, is being organised by the Central Bureau of In- The Department of Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Srinagar district now has 18,847 cases (1,629 are active, gramme, Economic Package and My Town-My Pride high- vestigation (CBI). had earlier conducted digital trainings for the Sarpanchs 16,871 have recovered, 347 have died), Baramulla - 5,722 (1,414 and Panchs to acquaint them with basics of computer and lights the UT government's commitment to empower youth who are one of the foremost priorities of J&K government," are active, 4,165 have recovered, 143 have died), Kulgam - Now, any Indian citizen can buy land in on how to work digitally, make digital payments, and main- 2,460 (98 are active, 2,316 have recovered, 46 have died), tain records etc, and they are already making MGNREGA the LG said while addressing media persons at Raj Bhavan in and 14th FC payments through digital signatures.
    [Show full text]
  • Javid Ahmad Bhat.Pdf
    NJESR/August 2021/ Vol-2/Issue-8 E- ISSN 2582-5836 DOI - 10.53571/NJESR 2021.2.8.44-52 A Political Study- Studying Factors Contributing To Political Turmoil In Kashmir Valley Javid Ahmad Bhat, Dr. Deepali Singh Research Scholar, Supervisor School of Humanities And Social Sciences Department of Political Science NIMS University Jaipur Rajasthan [email protected] Abstract The political turmoil started after the partition of India in 1947 as both India and Pakistan claimed the entirety of the former princely state of Jammu and Kashmir. It was in 1989 when the insurgency was born, as an indigenous movement against the corrupt governance. Kashmir has become a conflict zone between India and Pakistan; that escalated them into three wars and several other armed skirmishes. The political turmoil has ruined the state, and has forced New Delhi to notify the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) as a “disturbed area” and invoke controversial and draconian laws like the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) to maintain peace. Though New Delhi tried to occasionally reach out to Pakistan and even to Kashmir’s over the years, but for some brief periods of hope, peace has not prevailed in the Kashmir Valley Key words:- Political Turmoil India Pakistan, Dispute, Kashmir Introduction Kashmir valley is known as the paradise on the EARTH, not only because of its topography or the bounty of beautiful landscapes but also due to the existence of harmony and cordial relationships between the people of various sections and religions with least or no room for the differences on the basis of castes, colour or religion.
    [Show full text]