Lake Superior North Watershed WRAPS Report (Wq-Ws4-51A)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lake Superior North Watershed WRAPS Report (Wq-Ws4-51A) Lake Superior —North Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy Report August 2018 wq-ws4-51a Project Partners This WRAPS builds on the collaboration and stakeholder input processes that supported the Lake Superior North One Watershed, One Plan that was completed in 2016. This was led by Dan Schutte from the Lake County Soil and Water Conservation District and Ilena Hansel from the Cook County Soil and Water Conservation District. Support was provided to the plan process by a significant group of stakeholders and natural resource collaborators. In addition, a Core Team supported WRAPS development and included representatives from various state and federal agencies, local governments, non-profit groups and local land owners. Board of Water and Soil Resources Cook County Soil and Water Conservation District Cook County Zoning and Environmental Services Cook County Coalition of Lake Associations FluteReed River Watershed Partnership Grand Portage Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Lake County Soil and Water Conservation District Minnesota Department of Agriculture Minnesota Department of Health Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minnesota Pollution Control Agency St Croix River Watershed Research Station Tetra Tech U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service ii Table of Contents Project Partners................................ ......................................................................................................... ii Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................................... iii Key Terms ................................................................................................................................................ vii Abbreviations and Acronyms ................................................................................................................. viii Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... x What is the WRAPS Report?.................................................................................................................... xii 1. Watershed Background and Description ......................................................................... 1 2. Watershed Conditions .................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Condition Status ............................................................................................................................ 5 Streams ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Lakes.................................................................................................................................................... 13 Beaches ............................................................................................................................................... 17 2.2 Water Quality Trends .................................................................................................................. 19 Streams ............................................................................................................................................... 19 Lakes.................................................................................................................................................... 20 Beaches ............................................................................................................................................... 23 2.3 Stressors and Sources .................................................................................................................. 27 2.4 TMDL Summary ........................................................................................................................... 28 2.5 Protection Considerations ........................................................................................................... 29 Watershed Protection ......................................................................................................................... 29 Prioritizing Lakes and Streams for Protection ..................................................................................... 50 3. Prioritizing and Implementing Restoration and Protection ............................................ 55 3.1 Targeting of Geographic Areas ................................................................................................... 55 3.2 Civic Engagement ........................................................................................................................ 58 iii Accomplishments and Future Plans .................................................................................................... 59 Public Notice for Comments ............................................................................................................... 60 3.3 Restoration & Protection Strategies ........................................................................................... 60 4. Monitoring Plan ............................................................................................................ 65 Existing Monitoring Efforts ................................................................................................................. 65 Monitoring Needs ............................................................................................................................... 66 5. References and Further Information ............................................................................. 68 Appendix A. TMDL Summaries ............................................................................................. 70 Appendix B. Lake Prioritization Ranks .................................................................................. 72 Figures Figure 1. WRAPS 10-year cycle. .................................................................................................................. xii Figure 2. LSN Watershed project area. Note: Poplar River remains listed as impaired until officially approved for removal by EPA. The most recent draft list submitted to EPA proposes it for removal as an impaired water. ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 3. Land cover in the LSN Watershed. ................................................................................................. 4 Figure 4. E. coli exceedances of the maximum criterion (235 org/100 mL) in nearshore Lake Superior. .. 18 Figure 5. Total suspended solids concentrations (Apr–Sep) by year on the downstream reach of the Poplar River (AUID 04010101-613) ............................................................................................................. 20 Figure 6. E. coli average concentrations at beaches, ordered from southwest to northeast (2003–2016). .................................................................................................................................................................... 24 Figure 7. E. coli concentrations at Grand Marais beaches. ......................................................................... 25 Figure 8. Near shore monitoring sites near Grand Marais. ........................................................................ 26 Figure 9. Secchi transparency by year at Lake Superior near shore monitoring sites near Grand Marais. 26 Figure 10. Total phosphorus concentrations by year at Lake Superior near shore monitoring sites near Grand Marais. ............................................................................................................................................. 27 Figure 11. Percent impervious area by HUC12. .......................................................................................... 32 iv Figure 12. Population densities by HUC12. ................................................................................................. 33 Figure 13. Road density by HUC12. ............................................................................................................. 34 Figure 14. Total stream crossings by HUC12. ............................................................................................. 35 Figure 15. Aggregate sources. ..................................................................................................................... 36 Figure 16. Percent private land ownership by HUC12. ............................................................................... 37 Figure 17. State parks, recreation areas and waysides............................................................................... 38 Figure 18. Number of high erosion risk bluffs by HUC12............................................................................ 39 Figure 19. Stability of clay soils. .................................................................................................................. 40 Figure 20. Groundwater susceptibility in the LSN Watershed. ................................................................... 41 Figure 21. Designated aquatic invasive species infested waters. ............................................................... 42 Figure 22. Lakes of biological significance. ................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Watertrail Map 3.FH10
    LAKE SUPERIOR WATER TRAIL LAKE SUPERIOR Be familiar with dangers of hypothermia and Anticipate changes in weather, wind and wave by ake Superior is the largest freshwater dress appropriately for the cold water (32 to 50 monitoring a weather or marine VHF radio, and using lake on our planet, containing 10% of all degrees Fahrenheit). your awareness and common sense. the fresh water on earth. The lake's 32,000 Cold water is a killer - wearing a wet or dry suit is The National Weather Service broadcasts a 24 hour square mile surface area stretches across strongly recommended. updated marine forecast on KIG 64, weather band the border between the United States and channel 1 on the maritime VHF frequency, from Duluth; Canada; two countries, three states, one province Seek instruction and practice kayak skills, in- a version of this broadcast can be heard by calling 218- Route Description and many First Nations surround Superior's magnif- cluding rescues, before paddling on Lake Superior. 729-6697, press 4 for Lake Superior weather informa- (continued from other side) icent shoreline. The diverse natural history and Be certain your boat has adequate bow and stern tion. cultural heritage of the Lake Superior region offers flotation and that you have access to a pump for In Miles (0.0 at Minnesota Entrance -Duluth Lift Bridge) paddlers a unique experience on this remarkable emptying a flooded boat. Fog frequently restricts visibility to zero. global resource. Bring a good compass and know how to use it. 86.9 Lutsen Resort. One of the classic landmarks Travel with a companion or group.
    [Show full text]
  • What the “Trail Eyes” Pros Taught Us About the SHT P H
    A publication oF the Superior Hiking TrAil AssoCiation SUmmEr 2019 What the “Trail Eyes” Pros Taught Us About the SHT P H o im Malzhan iS the trail operations director T o for our sister trail organization the ice Age B y Fr Trail Alliance in Wisconsin. Doing business as esh T “Trail Eyes,” Tim was one of four entities the SHTA Tr hired in the fall of 2018 to evaluate and recom- ac mend renewal strategies for what we have dubbed k S mE D “The Big Bad Five,” those sections of the SHT most damaged from heavy use and old age (or both). i A Though all four evaluators—malzhan, Critical Connections Ecological Services (Jason and Amy Husveth), the north Country Trail Association, and (Continued on page 2) What the “Trail Eyes” Taught Us About the SHT (continued from cover) Great Lakes Trail Builders (Wil- lie Bittner)—did what we asked (provide specific prescriptions for the Big Bad Five), their ex- pert observations gave us much more: they shed light on the en- tire Superior Hiking Trail. In other words, what they saw on the Split Rock River loop, or the sections from Britton Peak to Oberg Mountain and Oberg to the Lutsen ski complex, or the proposed reroute of the SHT north of Gooseberry Falls State Park, were microcosms of bigger, more systemic issues with the SHT. ❚ “keep people on the Trail and water off of it.” This suc- cinct wisdom comes from Matt no bridge is not the only problem at the Split rock river loop.
    [Show full text]
  • Boarder Route Trail (BRT) BOARDER ROUTE TRAIL BRT Spurs Superior Hiking Trail !9 Campgrounds !I Parking
    Boarder Route Trail (BRT) BOARDER ROUTE TRAIL BRT Spurs Superior Hiking Trail !9 Campgrounds !i Parking Rose Lake East South Lake Clearwater Lake West Trailhead Crab Lake Topper Lake Gogebic Lake Pine Ridge Loon Lake Pine Lake Loon Lake Landing Clearwater Road McFarland Lake Crab Lake Trailhead South Lake Trailhead Portage Brook Otter Lake Trailhead East Trailhead Otter Lake 0 15 30 60 90 120 Miles ´ The Border Route Trail is a 65-mile long hiking trail that crosses the The Border Route Trail is a rugged Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW) in the far northeast wilderness hiking trail that follows corner of Minnesota (Arrowhead) and follows the international border ridge-lines and the top of high cliffs between Minnesota and Ontario, Canada. It connects with the Superior wherever feasible. Therefore, hiking Hiking Trail on its eastern terminus and with the Kekekabic Trail on its the trail offers expansive views across western end at the Gunflint Trail (Cook Cty. Road 12). The closest towns the Boundary Waters Canoe Area in are Grand Marais (beginning of Gunflint Trail, County Rd 12) and Hovland Minnesota and Quetico Provincal Park (beginning of Arrowhead Trail, County Road 16). In addition to the in Canada. eastern and western termini, the Border Route Trail can be accessed through several spur and connecting trails, allowing for hiking trips ranging from short day-hikes to multiday backpacking expeditions. http://www.borderroutetrail.org/ Sources: Boarder Route Trail Association, Esri, MN DNR, BWCA photos.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Federal Recreational Trail Grant Awards
    FEDERAL RECREATIONAL TRAIL PROGRAM 2019 Funded Grants Project # Applicant Organization Project Title Project Description Type of Use Total Project Cost Award Amount To purchase groom tracks; LTB maintains 52 miles of rough 0001-19-2C Cook County Tracks for groomers terrain with multiple access points to the State trail and Motorized $26,487.84 $19,865.88 businesses for lodging, food, and fuel. To purchase one snowmobile with light bar, bumper, winch, 0004-19-2C Town of Fredenberg Arctic Cat Bearcat Purchase and rear plate to be used to perform snowmobile trail Motorized $15,299.00 $11,474.25 maintenance. Josephine Nunn Trail Reconstruction To reclaim and reconstruct a 10' wide trail, to replace existing, 0006-19-3B City of Champlin Non-motorized $87,500.00 $63,000.00 Project poor condition 25-year old asphalt trail. To purchase equipment to maintain trails and pack trails for 0007-19-2A Itasca County Maintenance equipment Motorized $25,527.41 $19,145.56 winter riding To purchase equipment for grooming early season, 120 miles 0009-19-1C Lake of the Woods County Lightweight Snowmobile Trail Groomer Motorized $35,620.00 $26,715.00 of wooded and cross-country ski trails Trail & Campground Improvement & To help maintain and improve trails and campgrounds in parks 0011-19-S Minnesota Trail Riders Association Joint $46,000.00 $34,500.00 Maintenance and forests for all users. Cross Country Ski Trail Grooming To purchase equipment to groom the four GIA ski trails with 0012-19-1A Cass County Non-motorized $35,304.00 $26,478.00 Equipment over 63km
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019
    2019 ANNUAL REPORT Welcome to The North Country Trail Association WELCOME TO THE North Country Trail Association The North Country National Scenic Trail (NCNST) is the longest hiking path in America’s National Trails System stretching more than 4,600 miles across eight states. In 1981, the North Country Trail Association (NCTA) was incorporated as the official ‘friends’ organization of the Trail. Working alongside the National Park Service the Association is the Trail’s steward, providing experiences that celebrate nature, promote physical health and build community connections. Today, we are thousands strong. We are a united community of individuals and partners who embrace the spirit, peace, and beauty found along the Trail. TOGETHER WE... Hike it Build it Love It Photo: John Day MISSION OUR COMMUNITY’S CORE VALUES The North Country Trail Association develops, maintains, • Accountability We take ownership and responsibility for protects and promotes the North Country National Scenic our actions, policies and decisions. We engage in wise Trail as the premier hiking path across the northern tier of stewardship of public and private resources. the United States through a trail-wide coalition of volunteers • Collaboration We value the spirit of cooperation between and partners. staff, volunteers, all partners and landowners and are committed to building and maintaining this culture of VISION collaboration. Service is the backbone of our organization. Our vision for the North Country Trail is that of the premier footpath of national significance, offering a superb experience • Excellence We strive for exceptional quality and safety, for hikers and backpackers in a permanently protected both in the work we do in building and maintaining the Trail corridor, traversing and interpreting the richly diverse and in the experiences of the users of this world-class trail.
    [Show full text]
  • 22 AUG 2021 Index Acadia Rock 14967
    19 SEP 2021 Index 543 Au Sable Point 14863 �� � � � � 324, 331 Belle Isle 14976 � � � � � � � � � 493 Au Sable Point 14962, 14963 �� � � � 468 Belle Isle, MI 14853, 14848 � � � � � 290 Index Au Sable River 14863 � � � � � � � 331 Belle River 14850� � � � � � � � � 301 Automated Mutual Assistance Vessel Res- Belle River 14852, 14853� � � � � � 308 cue System (AMVER)� � � � � 13 Bellevue Island 14882 �� � � � � � � 346 Automatic Identification System (AIS) Aids Bellow Island 14913 � � � � � � � 363 A to Navigation � � � � � � � � 12 Belmont Harbor 14926, 14928 � � � 407 Au Train Bay 14963 � � � � � � � � 469 Benson Landing 14784 � � � � � � 500 Acadia Rock 14967, 14968 � � � � � 491 Au Train Island 14963 � � � � � � � 469 Benton Harbor, MI 14930 � � � � � 381 Adams Point 14864, 14880 �� � � � � 336 Au Train Point 14969 � � � � � � � 469 Bete Grise Bay 14964 � � � � � � � 475 Agate Bay 14966 �� � � � � � � � � 488 Avon Point 14826� � � � � � � � � 259 Betsie Lake 14907 � � � � � � � � 368 Agate Harbor 14964� � � � � � � � 476 Betsie River 14907 � � � � � � � � 368 Agriculture, Department of� � � � 24, 536 B Biddle Point 14881 �� � � � � � � � 344 Ahnapee River 14910 � � � � � � � 423 Biddle Point 14911 �� � � � � � � � 444 Aids to navigation � � � � � � � � � 10 Big Bay 14932 �� � � � � � � � � � 379 Baby Point 14852� � � � � � � � � 306 Air Almanac � � � � � � � � � � � 533 Big Bay 14963, 14964 �� � � � � � � 471 Bad River 14863, 14867 � � � � � � 327 Alabaster, MI 14863 � � � � � � � � 330 Big Bay 14967 �� � � � � � � � � � 490 Baileys
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Licenses
    TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NEW Regulations for 2006 n....................................................................5ew Fishing Licenses .......................................................................................7 General Regulations................................................................................10 Angling Methods................................................................................10 Possessing Fish ..................................................................................10 Transporting Fish ...............................................................................11 Other...................................................................................................13 Seasons and Limits ............................................................................15 Inland Waters......................................................................................15 Stream Trout.......................................................................................18 Lake Superior and Tributaries ................................................................20 Special Regulations............................................................................24 Intensive Management Lakes.............................................................24 Individual Waters ...............................................................................25 – Lakes.............................................................................................25 – Streams and Rivers .......................................................................35
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Trends at Minnesota Milestone Sites
    Water Quality Trends for Minnesota Rivers and Streams at Milestone Sites Five of seven pollutants better, two getting worse June 2014 Author The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs by using the Internet to distribute reports and David Christopherson information to wider audience. Visit our website for more information. MPCA reports are printed on 100% post- consumer recycled content paper manufactured without chlorine or chlorine derivatives. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North | Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 | www.pca.state.mn.us | 651-296-6300 Toll free 800-657-3864 | TTY 651-282-5332 This report is available in alternative formats upon request, and online at www.pca.state.mn.us . Document number: wq-s1-71 1 Summary Long-term trend analysis of seven different water pollutants measured at 80 locations across Minnesota for more than 30 years shows consistent reductions in five pollutants, but consistent increases in two pollutants. Concentrations of total suspended solids, phosphorus, ammonia, biochemical oxygen demand, and bacteria have significantly decreased, but nitrate and chloride concentrations have risen, according to data from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s (MPCA) “Milestone” monitoring network. Recent, shorter-term trends are consistent with this pattern, but are less pronounced. Pollutant concentrations show distinct regional differences, with a general pattern across the state of lower levels in the northeast to higher levels in the southwest. These trends reflect both the successes of cleaning up municipal and industrial pollutant discharges during this period, and the continuing challenge of controlling the more diffuse “nonpoint” polluted runoff sources and the impacts of increased water volumes from artificial drainage practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of Gitchi-Gami State Trail Segments
    © 2021 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Share the Trail with Others: DNR Information Center PARKING AVAILABLE: • Stay on designated trail. 500 Lafayette Road Gitchi-Gami • Keep right so others can pass. Saint Paul, MN 55155-4040 • SILVER CREEK CLIFF SEGMENT: at the • Keep all pets on leash/Dispose of pet (651) 296-6157 (metro area & outside MN) State Trail Silver Creek Cliff Wayside Rest parking waste. 1-888-646-6367 (MN toll free) Lake and Cook Counties lot, located on the east side of the Silver • Obey traffic signs and rules. Creek Cliff Tunnel. • Pack out all garbage and litter. Minnesota Department of Tourism • Respect adjoining landowners rights and 100 Metro Square • GOOSEBERRY FALLS STATE PARK to privacy. 121 - 7th Place East SILVER BAY SEGMENT: at the picnic flow • Warn other trail users when passing by Saint Paul, MN 55101-2112 parking lot in Gooseberry Falls State Park giving an audible signal. When complete, the Gitchi-Gami State Trail will (651) 296-5029 (metro area & outside MN) connect Two Harbors to Grand Marais along the (fee) and at the Visitor Center, Twin Point • Overnight camping and campfires are permitted only on designated campsites. 1-888-TOURISM (MN toll free) North Shore of Lake Superior. Much of the trail Public Water Access, the Trail Center in Do not leave campfires unattended. alignment will be located in Highway 61 Split Rock Lighthouse State Park, the trail Minnesota State-wide Bikeway Maps right-of-way or on abandoned segments of head parking lot in Beaver Bay near the • Enjoy the beauty of wild plants & animals, Minnesota Department of Transportation Highway 61.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6232 Department of Natural Resources Big G a M E
    MINNESOTA RULES 2008 4 6 4 CHAPTER 6232 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES BIG G A M E 6 2 3 2 0 4 0 0 REGISTRATION OF DEER 6232 3800 APPLICATION PROCEDURES FOR A MOOSE 6 2 3 2 0 6 0 0 SEASONS AND ZONES FOR TAKING DEER BY LICENSE ARCHERY 6232 4100 MOOSE ZONES 6232 1400 ZONE DESCRIPTIONS 6 2 3 2 4 4 0 0 GENERAL REGULATIONS FOR TAKING ELK 6232 1500 ARMS USE AREAS AND RESTRICTIONS 6232 4500 ELK LICENSE APPLICATION PROCEDURE 6 2 3 2 1980 TAKING DEER BY ANY WEAPON USING 6232 4600 ELK ZONES DISEASE MANAGEMENT PERMITS 6232 4700 REGISTRATION BLOCKS 6232 2900 BEAR PERMIT PROCEDURES 6232.0400 REGISTRATION OF DEER. Subpart 1 [Repealed, 20 SR 2287] Subp 2 Registration requirements. Persons tagging a deer must present the deer for registration at a designated deer registration station or agent of the commissioner and obtam a big game possession tag [For text of items A and B, see MR.] [For text ofsubps 3 and 4, see M R ] Subp 5 Deer taken in the special bovine tuberculosis area. Deer taken in the spe­ cial bovine tuberculosis area (deer area 101) must be registered prior to transport outside the area. Statutory Authority: MS s 97A 535, 97B 311 History: 33 SR 215 6232.0600 SEASONS AND ZONES FOR TAKING DEER BY ARCHERY. Subpart 1 Open dates. The open dates for taking deer by archery are from the Satur­ day nearest September 16 through December 31. Subp 2 [Repealed, 33 SR 215] Subp 3 [Repealed, 20 SR 2287] Statutory Authority: MS s 97B 311 History: 33 SR 215 6232.1400 ZONE DESCRIPTIONS.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey and Fish Man- E Streams of the North Shore Watershed
    nical Bulletin Number 1 SURVEY AND FISH MAN- E STREAMS OF THE NORTH SHORE WATERSHED LLOYD L. SM ITH, JR. and JOHN B. MOYLE DEPARTMENT Of CONSERVATION ISION OF GAME AND FISH This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp (Funding for document digitization was provided, in part, by a grant from the Minnesota Historical & Cultural Heritage Program.) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION DIVISION OF GAME AND FISH A BIOLOGICAL SURVEY AND FISHERY MAN­ AGEMENT PLAN FOR THE STREAMS OF THE LAKE SUPERIOR NORTH SHORE WATERSHED LLOYD L. SMITH, JR. Research Supervisor and JOHN B. MOYLE Aquatic Biologist A CONTRIBUTION FROM THE MINNESOTA FISHERIES RESEARCH LABORATORY TECHNICAL BULLETIN NO. 1 1 9 4 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA The Honorable Edward J. Thye ................... Governor MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Chester S. Wilson ............................ Commissioner E. V. Willard ........................ Deputy Commissioner DIVISION OF GAME AND FISH Verne E. Joslin ............................. Acting Director E. R. Starkweather ........................ Law Enforcement Norman L. Moe ........................... Fish Propagation George Weaver ........................ Commercial Fisheries Stoddard Robinson .................... Rough Fish Removal Lloyd L. Smith,- Jr........................ Fisheries Research Thomas Evans ........................ Stream Improvement Frank Blair .......................... ~ .. Game Management
    [Show full text]
  • North Shore Periphyton [Attached Algae] Survey
    North Shore Periphyton [Attached Algae] Survey July 2003 Jeff Jasperson MPCA Summer Intern Surveyed Streams: Tischer Creek Amity Creek and Lower Lester River Talmadge River French River Knife River Encampment River Gooseberry River Brule River General Trends · Periphyton abundance was greatest in the two Duluth urban streams (Tischer, Amity), and was not observed in the most rural stream (Brule) · Despite a few exceptions, periphyton levels were lower in streams farther from Duluth · Sunlight appears to be the limiting factor for periphyton growth in streams near the Duluth area. Essentially wherever adequate sunlight hit these streams, periphyton was observed · As expected, rivers with more pristine watersheds had lower levels of periphyton · In some survey streams, especially Knife River and Amity and Tischer Creeks, there was a noticeable increase in periphyton abundance near bridges or heavily used roads · Both epipelon (growth on soft sediments) and epilithion (growth on stones) periphyton were observed. Epilithion forms were by far the most common in North Shore streams. · Streamflow seems to factor into periphyton growth in North Shore streams. Riffles with moderate flow were found to support periphyton communities more often than stagnant backwaters or side pools. Growths along fast-flowing, shallow waterfalls were frequent. Stream: Tischer Creek Location of Survey: Greysolon Street to London Rd. Overpass (Duluth) Date/Time: July 24, 2003 @ 1345 In a survey of Tischer Creek from London Road to the St. Marie Street bridge, abundant growths of periphyton were observed. Nearly every region of the stream within the survey range exhibited very noticeable growths, making it difficult to establish any clear periphyton trends for this particular stream.
    [Show full text]