Mikxan Fenz Yceg
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Schechter@35: Living Judaism 4
“The critical approach, the honest and straightforward study, the intimate atmosphere... that is Schechter.” Itzik Biton “The defining experience is that of being in a place where pluralism “What did Schechter isn't talked about: it's lived.” give me? The ability Liti Golan to read the most beautiful book in the world... in a different way.” Yosef Peleg “The exposure to all kinds of people and a variety of Jewish sources allowed for personal growth and the desire to engage with ideas and people “As a daughter of immigrants different than me.” from Libya, earning this degree is Sigal Aloni a way to connect to the Jewish values that guided my parents, which I am obliged to pass on to my children and grandchildren.” Schechter@35: Tikva Guetta Living Judaism “I acquired Annual Report 2018-2019 a significant and deep foundation in Halakhah and Midrash thanks to the best teachers in the field.” Raanan Malek “When it came to Jewish subjects, I felt like an alien, lost in a foreign city. At Schechter, I fell into a nurturing hothouse, leaving the barren behind, blossoming anew.” Dana Stavi The Schechter Institutes, Inc. • The Schechter Institute of Jewish Studies, the largest M.A. program in is a not for profit 501(c)(3) Jewish Studies in Israel with 400 students and 1756 graduates. organization dedicated to the • The Schechter Rabbinical Seminary is the international rabbinical school advancement of pluralistic of Masorti Judaism, serving Israel, Europe and the Americas. Jewish education. The Schechter Institutes, Inc. provides support • The TALI Education Fund offers a pluralistic Jewish studies program to to four non-profit organizations 65,000 children in over 300 Israeli secular public schools and kindergartens. -
Developments in the Middle East: Political Studies and Governance, University of the Free State, South Africa
מרכז עזרי לחקר איראן ומדינות המפרץ This volume is a collection of the proceedings of the webinar “Developments in The Ezri Center for Iran & Gulf States Research the Middle East” held on 14 October 2020. The event was the first international webinar to mark the academic collaboration between the Ezri Center for Iran & Gulf States Research, University of Haifa, Israel and the Department of Developments in the Middle East: Political Studies and Governance, University of the Free State, South Africa. That academic collaboration being within the “Framework for Academic Proceedings of Colloquium 14/10/2020 Collaboration” that was agreed upon and signed between the two universities in April 2018. Speakers at the webinar were, Professor Philippe Burger, Professor Glen Segell (editor) Shaul Chorev, Dr. Thamar E. Gindin, Dr. Eben Coetzee, Ashkan Safaei Hakimi, Professor Amatzia Baram, Dr. Eran Segal, Dr. Soli Shahvar, Dr. Ido Zelkovitz, Dr. Glen Segell, Professor Theo Neethling, Professor Hussein Solomon and Dr. Moshe Terdiman. Proceedings of the Webinar "Developments in the Middle East" First international Webinar to mark the Framework for Academic Collaboration between the Ezri Center for Iran & Gulf States Research, University of Haifa, and the Department of Political Studies and Governance University of the Free State מרכז עזרי לחקר איראן ומדינות המפרץ The Ezri Center for Iran & Gulf States Research Developments in the Middle East: Proceedings of Colloquium 14/10/2020 GLEN SEGELL (Editor) Copyright © Glen Segell 2021 (Editor) Copyright © Glen Segell 2021 (Cover Design) Noga Yoselevich: Graphic Design Cover Satellite Image Copyright © NASA Johnson Space Centre All rights reserved. ISBN 9798699275601 (Paperback) Imprint: Independently published DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29659.39201 University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel ISBN 9781901414462 (EPUB) British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. -
When Parsha & Calendar Meet
e"dl zyxt zay xacna e"qyz xii` h"k May 26•27, '06 This Shabbat is the 236th day (of 354); the 34th Shabbat (of 50) of 5766 • We read/learn the SIXTH perek of Pirkei Avot an:k ` l`eny :mlFrÎc© «¨ r L£grx©f «§ oi¬¥aE ir§ ²¦x©f oi¬¥aE LÀ¤pi¥aE i´¦pi¥A | d´¤i§d«¦i 'ºd... When Parsha & Calendar Meet Parshat Mishpatim this year was at the end of Shvat. Anything to say about that? Don't know. Parshat Balak in early Tammuz? Don't know. Sometimes it isn't easy to find a Parsha•Calendar connection. But sometimes it is. Like theA weekly feature of Torah Tidbits to help clarify practical fact that Parshat No'ach is in Cheshvan. The obvious common factor is Rain.and conceptual aspects of the Jewish Calendar, thereby better fulfilling the mitzva of HaChodesh HaZeh Lachem... And the sedras that deal with Yosef and his brothers are read around This Shabbat we bench Chanuka time. There's something there to make a connection. Rosh Chodesh Sivan, How about reading Parshat Bamidbar, beginning the book of Bamidbar, and which will be on Sun• day • Yom Rishon, that benching Rosh Chodesh Sivan on the same Shabbat? With the Molad of Sivan is. Sivan's Rosh Chodesh is always one being on that Shabbat. With Rosh Chodesh Sivan beginning even beforeday, in our fixed calendar, because Iyar Shabbat Bamidbar is over? Seems as if we have what to say. has 29 days. Sivan itself always have 30. This Shabbat, we read of G•d's command to Moshe to count the people. -
Israel Summer Time from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
Israel Summer Time From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia שעון קיץ :(Hebrew Time Summer Israel sha'on kayits "Summer Clock"), also in English, Israel Daylight Time (IDT) is the practice in Israel by which clocks are advanced by one hour, beginning on the Friday before the last Sunday of March, and ending on the last Sunday of October. Contents 1 History 1.1 Pre–1992 1.2 1992–2005 1.3 2005–2012 1.4 2013–Present 2 Daylight time in Palestinian territories 3 Summer Time Dates 4 See also 5 References 6 External links Time zone in Israel: History Israel Standard Time (UTC+2) yellow Pre–1992 Israel Summer Time (UTC+3) Before 1992, daylight saving was Grey colours indicate areas which governed by the Time Act, a law inherited do not follow either IST or IDT. by Israel from the British Mandate of Palestine, which started to use daylight saving in World War II.[1] Summer Time was introduced in Israel between the years 1948–1957, but the length of Daylight Saving Time has changed significantly depending on the year. In 1951–1952, it was enacted for about seven months, whereas in the years 1953–1954 it was enacted for only three months. In 1958, daylight saving time was canceled. Due to the global energy crisis because of the aftermath of the Yom Kippur War, Summer Time was When IDT starts, enacted again from 1974–1975. clocks advance from 02:00 to 03:00. Up until 1992, daylight saving time was operated by an order of the minister of the interior. -
Rambam Notation: Ctyz:Fh '` Dark)
,dW¨ A¨ I©A© oia¥ E mI¨A© oiA¥ mic¦n§ Frd¨ ,di¨a§ X¦ a© E dx¨v¨ A§ mip¦EzP§d© ,l`¥ x¨U§ i¦ ziA¥ lM¨ Epig«¥ `© ,dN¨ `ªb§ l¦ cEAr§ X¦ n¦ E ,dx¨F`l§ dl¨ t¥ `£n¥ E ,dg¨ e¨x§l¦ dx¨S¨ n¦ m`¥ iv¦ Fie§ ,md¤ il¥ r£ mg¥ x©i§ mFwO¨ d© .on¥ `¨ xn© `Ÿpe§ ,aix¦w¨ on© f§ a¦ E `l¨ b¨r£A© `Y¨ W§ d© d`x mikxan zay ux¤`¨½ d¨Îz`¤ zW¤x´¤l¨ Æ`Ÿal¨ oC½¥x§©Id© Îz`¤ mix´¦a§Ÿr« ÆmY¤`© iM³¦ :DA«¨ ÎmY¤a§ W© ie¦« Dz¨Ÿ` m¬Y¤W§ x¦ie¦« m®k¤l¨ o´z¥Ÿp mk¤id¥Ÿl« '`¡ 'd¬ ÎxW¤`£ August 6-7, '21 • `"tyz'd a` mgpn h"k Yerushalayim in/out times for Parshat R'EI (m) 4 6:56PM Plag (earliest) 6:07PM • %32 8:10PM R' Tam 8:48PM For other locales see Z'MANIM link 'd wxt :zea` Philo-Torah - 1 - All@Once file close enough, whose first op is also Motza"Sh. Since Menachem Av has 30 days in Shabbat M'vorchim our fixed calendar, Rosh Chodesh Elul Shabbat is Erev Rosh Chodesh Elul. is two days. Elul itself has 29 days. We bench Rosh Chodesh... but we Seuda Sh'lishit don't say the MACHAR CHODESH haftara If Seuda Sh'lishit extends until after dark, there is a dispute as to whether Rosh Chodesh Elul is Sunday and R'TZEI is said in Birkat HaMazon, Monday, August 8th & 9th. -
Nedarim and Revenge Against Midian
mikxan irqn-zehn e"dl 868 July 17•18, '09 • h"qyz fenz e"k This Shabbat is the 292nd day (of 354), 42nd Shabbat (of 50) of 5769 :l`¨ «¥x§U¦i zi¬¥A zFggR§§ W¦nÎl«¨k§e arw£®r«©i zi´¥A 'dÎx©g a§c E¬r§n¦W PIRKEI AVOT: In Israel • 2nd perek; In Chutz LaAretz • 1st perek The community that neglected a mitzva There is a Jewish community • a fine Jewish community, really • with shuls and schools and mikve, with an eiruv, a glatt slaughterhouse, kosher supermarkets and restaurants, Daf Yomi available in three languages at different times of the day, a great chesed infrastructure and community support of individuals with a variety of "situations". It isn't just the community as a whole that is so exemplary, its members are out• standing models of intelligent, learned, observant, sensitive and caring Jews. We could say that this community is perfect... except for one thing: There Correct for TT 868 • Rabbeinu Tam (J'm) • 9:08pm is one mitzva they don't follow, when 7:09 (6:18) Yerushalayim 8:26pm 7:26 (6:20) S'derot 8:27pm they shecht (ritual slaughter) 7:24 (6:18) Gush Etzion 8:26pm chickens, they neglect to cover the 7:27 (6:20) Raanana 8:28pm blood of the sh'chita as is required by 7:25 (6:19) Beit Shemesh 8:27pm the Torah and as is detailed in 7:26 (6:20) Rehovot 8:28pm Halacha. KISUI DAM BE'AFAR. Their 7:27 (6:20) Netanya 8:29pm sh'chita is meticulous. -
2013 Year in Review
JNF 2013 YEARJNF 2013 I 2013 YEAR IN REVIEW N R With the close of our 2013 campaign year, Jewish National Fund has just announced that its annual campaign EVIEW topped $121 million, the largest in our history. We could not have reached this milestone without the generosity of our supporters across the country and the dedication of our lay leaders and professional staff. Charity Navigator, America’s leading independent charity evaluator, has once again bestowed its 4-star rating in recognition of JNF’s sound fiscal management and commitment to accountability and transparency. JNF has also been rated a top charity by the American Institute of Philanthropy and meets the 20 rigorous standards of the Better Business Bureau Wise Giving Alliance. We are very proud to be acknowledged for the responsible stewardship of your contributions. With your support, JNF continued to make a tangible difference in the lives of all the people of Israel. Our Blueprint Negev campaign is moving forward and this year we saw the opening of a world-class visitor center at Abraham’s Well in Be’er Sheva that will attract over 250,000 visitors per year; our Housing Development Fund was established to help move population to the Negev; we are partnering with Nefesh B’Nefesh to bring young olim to the north and south; and we announced an expanded partnership with the Alexander Muss High School in Israel (AMHSI) that will catapult Zionist education and engagement to the next level. JNF’s newest undertaking is our recently launched Go North campaign, a new plan focusing on the revitalization of northern Israel. -
Final Report
Final Report For the Period: January 1,1997 - June 30,2001 Submitted to the U.S. Agency for International Development; Bu- reau for Global Programs, Field Support and Research; Center for Economic Growth and Agricultural Development TITLE OF PROJECT: AGROMETEOROLOGICAL APPROACH TO CROP WATER USE EVALUATION FOR IMPROVED IRRIGATION EFFICIENCY Principal Investigator: Prof. M. Fuchs Grantee Institution: Inst. of Soil, Water and Environment, ARO, Volcani Center, P.O. Box 6, - Bet Dagan, 50250, Israel Collaborator: Dr. J. Rahmanov Institution: Scientific and Research Institute for Irrigation, Bishkek, Toktonaiieva, 4% 720055, Kyrgyzstan Project Number: CA14-023 Grant Number: TA-MOU-96-CAI 4-023 Grant Project Officer: Boaz Ayalon, Science Counselor, American Embassy, Tel Aviv Project Duration: January 1,1997 to June 30,2001 2 .- Table of Contents . 1 Executive Summary .............................................................................................3 2 Research Objectives .............................................................................................3 3 Methods and Results ............................................................................................4 3.1 Comparing model against traditional methods .............................................4 3.1 :1 Specifications of the experimental plot .................................................. 4 3.1.1.1 Location .............................................................................................4 ~~~~ ~ 3.1.1.2 Climate ...............................................................................................4