DOCSLIB.ORG

Associate Professor HO PENG

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

VOL. 08 ISSUE 01 JAN - JUN 2009 ISSN: 0219-6441 LawLinkThe Alumni Magazine of the National University of Singapore Faculty of Law aLAWmnus Feature: Mr Jeffrey Chan SC ’73 Mr David Chong SC ’84 Mr Francis Xavier SC ’88 Mr Ang Cheng Hock SC ’95 Cover Story Senior Minister of State (Ministry of Law & Ministry of Home Affairs) Associate Professor HO PENG KEE ’79 A word from the Editor CONTENTS Building Bonds Dean’s Message 1 Law School Highlights y law class graduated in 1985 and the bulk of us were called to the Singapore Bar in early 1986. I remember there was a recession in Singapore then. I Donors’ List 2 Mam grateful to Mr Woo Tchi Chu ’68 of Robert Wang & Woo LLC, who Class of ’86 Bennett Lam Scholarship 2 gave me my first job in legal practice. I was pleased to meet Mr Woo after so many Awards Tea Reception years, at the law school’s Donors Appreciation Dinner (page 3) and he still looked Appreciation Dinner for the Benefactors 3 evergreen. of the NUS Faculty of Law Alumni of our law school do much for our students and young graduates. Year 6th Professorial Lecture - 4 after year, the whole graduating class (those who plan to enter the legal profession) Professor Stanley Yeo ’76 manage to secure their pupillage positions very early in their 4th year. There is an Visit by Chief Justice of India 4 excellent plan being rolled out a good two years before the students even reach their HKU-NUS-SMU Symposium 5 final year. The Law Careers Fair, organized by the Law Club, is held in February every year. When I walk around the booths, I meet many alumni who return to 22nd Singapore Law Review Lecture 6 their alma mater to show interest, on behalf of their firms or the Legal Service, to Alumni Reunion in Hong Kong 7 recruit our students. Overseas Internship – 8 Then there are the various internship opportunities in law firms, legal and other Baker & McKenzie, London departments of organizations and government authorities that are taken up by APCEL Conference 9 our law students during their vacation. The initial contact to seek the internship Graduate Diploma in Singapore Law 18 position is usually made through one of our law alumni. Graduation Ceremony It is surely a “win-win” situation, because of the early exposure of the firms and Law IV Musical 2008- 18 organizations as potential employers, and our young and bright as future talent to The Perfect Wedding join the legal fraternity. AsianSIL Young Scholars Workshop 19 We acknowledge the help and support we receive from alumni who return to law school for a host of reasons, for example, to give talks or conduct moots training. aLAWmnus Feature We also deeply appreciate our donors, both individuals and corporate donors, who 4 Senior Counsels 10 continue to support the law school. Thank you for all for your - Jeffrey Chan ’73 big hearts and remembering your alma mater in both good - David Chong Gek Sian ’84 and bad times. - Francis Xavier ’88 It leaves me now to thank the team of writers and - Ang Cheng Hock ’95 contributors of this issue and Christopher Bartholomeusz Cover Story – for his administrative support. I would also like to thank Senior Minister of State 14 Associate Dean Goh Mia Yang ’92 for her guidance and Associate Professor Ho Peng Kee ’79 advice, and our legal managers team who helped to arrange Reflections of a ’84-er Agnes Sng 27 for submission of the various articles. Happy reading! Class Reunions 20th Anniversary Reunion of Class of ’88 12 10th Anniversary Reunion of Class of ’98 17 Joyce Khoo-Phua ’85 Class of ’83 Gathering 25 Editor Associate Director Alumni Relations and Development Faculty Features Professor Stephen Darryl Girvin 20 Assistant Professor David Tan 21 Faculty Update 22 Visiting Professors 24 ClassAction Upcoming Reunion Events 25 Happy “Niu” Year “Lou Yu Sheng” - The Administrative Team at the Thrilled by Santa’s visit - January 2009 Faculty of Law December 2008 ClassAction 26 LawLink - NUS Faculty of Law News from Office of Alumni Relations 469G Bukit Timah Road Eu Tong Sen Building Singapore 259776. Shaw Foundation Alumni House 28 website : www.law.nus.edu.sg/alumni Law Faculty Sculpture 29 We want to hear from you, please contact us at: email : [email protected] • tel : (65) 6516 3616 • fax : (65) 6779 0979 Update your personal particulars at: www.law.nus.edu.sg/alumni/update_particulars.asp Design & Production by Brownsea Services (S) Pte Ltd [ Dean’s Message ] t the end of May 2010, I will complete my third term as Dean. At that point, I will have been a part of the law school’s management Afor almost 14 years, first as Vice-Dean from 1996 and Dean from 1 May 2001. Although I have enjoyed leading a great law school, it is time for renewal; a time for someone with new energy and fresh ideas to take the law school to the next level. I am therefore very pleased to announce that the university has established a Dean Search Committee for the law school. The committee is chaired by Vice-Provost Lai Choy Heng who was a former Dean of Science. The other members of the committee are Professor Tommy Koh, Professor Lim Pin (a former Vice-Chancellor), Professor Ten Chin Liew (a well-known philosopher), Professor Jeffrey Pinsler and Associate Professor Tang Hang Wu, both members of the law school’s academic faculty. The committee is canvassing widely for potential candidates and it is my hope that we will have a shortlist of perhaps 5 or 6 local and international candidates for the position. “More recently, the support from you, our alumni and friends, has been crucial in providing the law school with the necessary resources to compete effectively with the other great law schools of the world. ” As I reflect upon the last few years, and as many of you have said to me, the law school has developed incredibly. A large part of the reason for this is of course the strong foundation laid by previous Deans of the school. More recently, the support from you, our alumni and friends, has been crucial in providing the law school with the necessary resources to compete effectively with the other great law schools of the world. I am often struck by the warm and generous support from many of you and as I write this message I have in front of me a letter from a “proud” alumnus volunteering to tutor at the law school without any remuneration. I thank all of you for being good friends of the law school during my Deanship. The contents in each issue of LawLink provide a nice snapshot of what the law school has been up to in the last 6 months and this issue is no exception. As you can see, we have had a (typical) good and productive half year. New colleagues have joined the law school (of whom 2 are featured), many distinguished visitors have taught here, lectures and conferences were organized, our students and alumni are doing well, we continue to strengthen our relationship with our alumni community, and scholarship – the life blood of any academic institution – continues to thrive. continued next page LawLink 1 [ Dean’s Message / Law School Highlights ] Another barometer of our strong international reputation is in the growing number of academic delegations that want to visit the law school to learn from our experience and who invite us to their institutions to work with them to strengthen Law School their curriculum and pedagogy. As a global law school, our international engagements now take up so much time that I recently appointed Professor Amirthalingam Kumaralingam as Benefactors Vice-Dean of International Programmes. Kumar used to oversee AUGUST to DECEMBER 2008 the Student Exchange Programme and is thus well placed to manage this larger portfolio. His addition to the decanal team will strengthen the law school’s management team. DEAN’S CIRCLE – ABOVE $1,000 APAA Book Prize On a sadder note, I Asian Patent Attorneys Association $1,000 remember Lo Hwei Yen Asia-Pacific Centre For Environmental Law (APCEL) from the Class of 2003. Lye Lin Heng, Irene ’73 $1,000 She was an intelligent and Centre for International Law bubbly young woman Koh Thong Bee Tommy ’61 $3,500 who lived life with gusto. Class of 1986 Bennett Lam Scholarship Fund In fact she was at the law Mansurhusain Akbar Hussien ’86 $1,000 school a few weeks before Class of 1987 Bursary the incident in Mumbai to Lim Wan Peng ’87 $2,000 speak to students in the CLE General Purpose Donation Account Aviation Law course. She Norton Rose (Asia) LLP $3,000 liked our new campus and was proud of the law school. We too Law Society of Singapore Book Prizes are proud of her and share the loss of a young and beautiful The Law Society of Singapore $1,500 person’s life cut short. In her memory, I want to share a photo Lee Sheridan Legal Education Fund that she took with me at her Commencement that her husband, Allen & Gledhill LLP $1,200 Michael Puhaindran ’96, sent to me. I’m sure this is how she Colin Ng & Partners LLP $3,000 would want us to remember her. Drew & Napier LLC $3,000 KhattarWong $3,000 I wish all of you the very best in the months ahead and hope that Mohan s/o Reviendran Pillay ’85 $9,120 by the time the next issue of LawLink reaches you the economic Rajah & Tann LLP $4,800 climate will at least have stabilized if not improved.
Recommended publications
  • Why Are Gender Reforms Adopted in Singapore? Party Pragmatism and Electoral Incentives* Netina Tan

    Why Are Gender Reforms Adopted in Singapore? Party Pragmatism and Electoral Incentives* Netina Tan

    Why Are Gender Reforms Adopted in Singapore? Party Pragmatism and Electoral Incentives* Netina Tan Abstract In Singapore, the percentage of elected female politicians rose from 3.8 percent in 1984 to 22.5 percent after the 2015 general election. After years of exclusion, why were gender reforms adopted and how did they lead to more women in political office? Unlike South Korea and Taiwan, this paper shows that in Singapore party pragmatism rather than international diffusion of gender equality norms, feminist lobbying, or rival party pressures drove gender reforms. It is argued that the ruling People’s Action Party’s (PAP) strategic and electoral calculations to maintain hegemonic rule drove its policy u-turn to nominate an average of about 17.6 percent female candidates in the last three elections. Similar to the PAP’s bid to capture women voters in the 1959 elections, it had to alter its patriarchal, conservative image to appeal to the younger, progressive electorate in the 2000s. Additionally, Singapore’s electoral system that includes multi-member constituencies based on plurality party bloc vote rule also makes it easier to include women and diversify the party slate. But despite the strategic and electoral incentives, a gender gap remains. Drawing from a range of public opinion data, this paper explains why traditional gender stereotypes, biased social norms, and unequal family responsibilities may hold women back from full political participation. Keywords: gender reforms, party pragmatism, plurality party bloc vote, multi-member constituencies, ethnic quotas, PAP, Singapore DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5509/2016892369 ____________________ Netina Tan is an assistant professor of political science at McMaster University.
  • The Rule of Law and Urban Development

    The Rule of Law and Urban Development

    The Rule of Law and Urban Development The transformation of Singapore from a struggling, poor country into one of the most affluent nations in the world—within a single generation—has often been touted as an “economic miracle”. The vision and pragmatism shown by its leaders has been key, as has its STUDIES URBAN SYSTEMS notable political stability. What has been less celebrated, however, while being no less critical to Singapore’s urban development, is the country’s application of the rule of law. The rule of law has been fundamental to Singapore’s success. The Rule of Law and Urban Development gives an overview of the role played by the rule of law in Singapore’s urban development over the past 54 years since independence. It covers the key principles that characterise Singapore’s application of the rule of law, and reveals deep insights from several of the country’s eminent urban pioneers, leaders and experts. It also looks at what ongoing and future The Rule of Law and Urban Development The Rule of Law developments may mean for the rule of law in Singapore. The Rule of Law “ Singapore is a nation which is based wholly on the Rule of Law. It is clear and practical laws and the effective observance and enforcement and Urban Development of these laws which provide the foundation for our economic and social development. It is the certainty which an environment based on the Rule of Law generates which gives our people, as well as many MNCs and other foreign investors, the confidence to invest in our physical, industrial as well as social infrastructure.
  • The Criminal Procedure Code 2010

    The Criminal Procedure Code 2010

    (2011) 23 SAcLJ Modernising the Criminal Justice Framework 23 MODERNISING THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE FRAMEWORK The Criminal Procedure Code 2010 The concept of “balancing” prevalent in criminal justice discourse is premised on a paradigm where “state” and “individual” interests are perpetually in conflict. This article outlines the key components of the new Criminal Procedure Code 2010 and discusses another dimension of the state- individual relationship. Rather than being inherently incompatible, synergistic common goals can, on occasion, be pursued between the State and an accused. The article will also consider areas in the Criminal Procedure Code 2010 where conflicts between “state” and “individual” interests have in fact arisen, and will outline the pragmatic approach that has been adopted towards their resolution. Melanie CHNG* LLB (Hons) (National University of Singapore), LLM (Harvard); Advocate & Solicitor (Singapore); Assistant Director, Ministry of Law. The criminal process is at the heart of the criminal justice system. It is not only a subject of great practical importance; it is also a reflection of our ideals and values as to the way in which we can accord justice to both the guilty and to the innocent.[1] I. Introduction 1 The recent legislative amendments to Singapore’s Criminal Procedure Code (“CPC”) signify a new chapter in the continuing evolution of Singapore’s criminal justice process. The new Criminal Procedure Code 2010 (“New CPC”),2 which came into force on * The opinions expressed in this article are those of its author and are not representative of the official position or policies of the Singapore government. The author is grateful to Mr Amarjeet Singh SC, Ms Jennifer Marie SC, Mr Bala Reddy, Professor Michael Hor, Mr Subhas Anandan, Ms Valerie Thean and Mr Desmond Lee for their invaluable comments on an earlier draft of this article.
  • 331KB***Administrative and Constitutional

    331KB***Administrative and Constitutional

    (2016) 17 SAL Ann Rev Administrative and Constitutional Law 1 1. ADMINISTRATIVE AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW THIO Li-ann BA (Oxon) (Hons), LLM (Harvard), PhD (Cantab); Barrister (Gray’s Inn, UK); Provost Chair Professor, Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore. Introduction 1.1 In terms of administrative law, the decided cases showed some insight into the role of courts in relation to: handing over town council management to another political party after a general election, the susceptibility of professional bodies which are vested with statutory powers like the Law Society review committee to judicial review; as well as important observations on substantive legitimate expectations and developments in exceptions to the rule against bias on the basis of necessity, and how this may apply to private as opposed to statutory bodies. Many of the other cases affirmed existing principles of administrative legality and the need for an evidential basis to sustain an argument. For example, a bare allegation of bias without evidence cannot be sustained; allegations of bias cannot arise when a litigant is simply made to follow well-established court procedures.1 1.2 Most constitutional law cases revolved around Art 9 issues. Judicial observations on the nature or scope of specific constitutional powers were made in cases not dealing directly with constitutional arguments. See Kee Oon JC in Karthigeyan M Kailasam v Public Prosecutor2 noted the operation of a presumption of legality and good faith in relation to acts of public officials; the Prosecution, in particular, is presumed “to act in the public interest at all times”, in relation to all prosecuted cases from the first instance to appellate level.
  • SCL (Singapore) Annual Construction Law Conference 2021 HOPE and FEARS - the Built Environment in the Next Decade Thursday, 23 September 2021 • 9.00 A.M

    SCL (Singapore) Annual Construction Law Conference 2021 HOPE and FEARS - the Built Environment in the Next Decade Thursday, 23 September 2021 • 9.00 A.M

    SCL (Singapore) Annual Construction Law Conference 2021 HOPE AND FEARS - the Built Environment in the Next Decade Thursday, 23 September 2021 • 9.00 a.m. to 5.30 p.m. Hybrid Conference Option of Attending In-Person (Limited Places & Subject to Government Approvals) or Via Zoom Webinar GUEST OF HONOUR & REGISTER HERE KEYNOTE SPEAKER OR SCAN QR CODE Ms Indranee THURAI RAJAH Minister, the Prime Minister’s Office; ABOUT THIS CONFERENCE Second Minister for Finance and National Development; Member of Parliament for Tanjong Hopes and fears – the built environment in the next decade Pagar GRC Business sectors including the built environment have had to and will continue to remould themselves in the shifting sands of the COVID-19 pandemic – there is no certainty that the old normal will ever return. Ms Indranee Rajah is the Minister in the Prime Minister’s This year’s SCL (Singapore) Annual Conference kicks off with Office. She is also Second Minister for Finance, and Second a discussion on transformative technologies and sustainable Minister for National Development. Ms Rajah has been the solutions during project execution before what is hopefully Member of Parliament for the Tanjong Pagar Group an invigorating yet light-hearted debate takes place on Representation Constituency (GRC) since 2001. She was in whether the next decade will bring forth a more collaborative practice as a lawyer and Senior Counsel before joining the working style in the built environment or will a culture of Government. Under her law portfolio from 2012 - 2018, she blame be the prevailing approach. After lunch, various co-chaired the Committees on Family Justice, the formation stakeholders provide their intriguing insights into what could of the Singapore International Commercial Court as well as perhaps be seen as a generational change in the conduct of the Committee to Strengthen Singapore as an International virtual dispute resolution hearings in a post-COVID-19 world.
  • Home Team Connects 3.2021

    Home Team Connects 3.2021

    3/2021 EDITOR’S PICK HTVN WEBINAR: CONNECTING YOU WITH THE HOME TEAM The Home Team Volunteer Network (HTVN) organised its third webinar via Zoom on 24 February evening. Titled Staying Vigilant Against Scams, SPF colleagues shared useful tips on how to avoid being scammed. Other highlights include Q&A segment related to the topic and dialogue session with both Co-Chairmen of HTVN, MOS Desmond Tan and A/P Ho Peng Kee. For Home Team volunteers who did not manage to join us, fret not as there will be more to come! Photo: HTVN Facebook HIGHLIGHTS ‘HTVN ASKS’ WITH MOS DESMOND TAN MOS Desmond Tan, Co-Chairman of the Home Team Volunteer Network (HTVN), takes on questions relating to HTVN and even a little bit about himself. Thank you to all Home Team Volunteers for the questions asked via our Facebook and Instagram stories. >> Check out the Q&A on HTVN FB START FROM YOUNG On 19th February, SCDF held the finale of its Junior Civil Defence Lionhearter Challenge virtually on Zoom. The Challenge saw close to 150 students from 28 primary schools participating in a series of cool lifesaving activities and Associate Professor Ho Peng Kee, Chairman of the Home Team Volunteer Network, graced the virtual event. Great work, everyone! #ANationOfLifesavers >> Check out highlights from the Challenge on SCDF FB PHOTO: SCDF COMMITTEE OF SUPPLY (COS) DEBATE 2021 At the COS Debate in Parliament on 1 March 2021, Minister K Shanmugam, Second Minister Josephine Teo, Minister of State Assoc Prof Muhammad Faishal Ibrahim and Minister of State Desmond Tan outlined key initiatives undertaken by the Home Team to keep Singapore safe and secure.
  • 4 Comparative Law and Constitutional Interpretation in Singapore: Insights from Constitutional Theory 114 ARUN K THIRUVENGADAM

    4 Comparative Law and Constitutional Interpretation in Singapore: Insights from Constitutional Theory 114 ARUN K THIRUVENGADAM

    Evolution of a Revolution Between 1965 and 2005, changes to Singapore’s Constitution were so tremendous as to amount to a revolution. These developments are comprehensively discussed and critically examined for the first time in this edited volume. With its momentous secession from the Federation of Malaysia in 1965, Singapore had the perfect opportunity to craft a popularly-endorsed constitution. Instead, it retained the 1958 State Constitution and augmented it with provisions from the Malaysian Federal Constitution. The decision in favour of stability and gradual change belied the revolutionary changes to Singapore’s Constitution over the next 40 years, transforming its erstwhile Westminster-style constitution into something quite unique. The Government’s overriding concern with ensuring stability, public order, Asian values and communitarian politics, are not without their setbacks or critics. This collection strives to enrich our understanding of the historical antecedents of the current Constitution and offers a timely retrospective assessment of how history, politics and economics have shaped the Constitution. It is the first collaborative effort by a group of Singapore constitutional law scholars and will be of interest to students and academics from a range of disciplines, including comparative constitutional law, political science, government and Asian studies. Dr Li-ann Thio is Professor of Law at the National University of Singapore where she teaches public international law, constitutional law and human rights law. She is a Nominated Member of Parliament (11th Session). Dr Kevin YL Tan is Director of Equilibrium Consulting Pte Ltd and Adjunct Professor at the Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore where he teaches public law and media law.
  • OPENING of the LEGAL YEAR 2019 Speech by Attorney-General

    OPENING of the LEGAL YEAR 2019 Speech by Attorney-General

    OPENING OF THE LEGAL YEAR 2019 Speech by Attorney-General, Mr Lucien Wong, S.C. Monday, 7 January 2019 Supreme Court Building, Level Basement 2, Auditorium May it please Your Honours, Chief Justice, Judges of Appeal, Judges and Judicial Commissioners of the Supreme Court, Introduction: AGC in Support of the Government, for the People 1 2018 was a fast-paced year for the Government and for the Attorney-General’s Chambers. The issues occupying the thoughts of Singapore’s leaders were complex and varied, with several key themes coming to the fore. These themes shaped our work over the past year, as we strove to be a strategic partner in support of the Government’s plans and initiatives, for the benefit of our country and its citizens. I will touch on three of these themes. 2 The first theme was our Smart Nation. This initiative aims to tap on the ongoing digital revolution in order to transform Singapore through technology. The Smart Nation vision is for Singapore to be a world-class leader in the field of digital innovation, resting on the triple pillars of a digital economy, digital government, and digital society. The Smart Nation revolution will play a critical part in ensuring our continued competitiveness on the world stage, powered by digital innovation. 1 3 Data sharing was and continues to be a critical aspect of this initiative. To this end, a new law was passed in 2018 which introduced a data sharing regime among different agencies in the Singapore Government. The Public Sector (Governance) Act 2018, which was drafted by our Chambers in support of this initiative, underpins and formalises a data sharing framework for the Singapore public sector.
  • Compromising on Consideration in Singapore: Gay Choon Ing V Loh Sze Ti Terence Peter Goh Yihan*

    Compromising on Consideration in Singapore: Gay Choon Ing V Loh Sze Ti Terence Peter Goh Yihan*

    Supreme Court of Singapore, 1 Supreme Court Lane, Singapore 178879, t: (65)-6332-1020 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ We are grateful to the authors, editors and publishers for their kind permission granted to post the respective articles on the Singapore Judicial College website. No article posted here may be circulated or reproduced without the prior permission of the author(s), editor(s) and publisher (where applicable). Our Vision: Excellence in judicial education and research. Our Mission: To provide and inspire continuing judicial learning and research to enhance the competency and professionalism of judges. Compromising on consideration in Singapore: Gay Choon Ing v Loh Sze Ti Terence Peter Goh Yihan* Introduction It is not often that a judgment contains a reference to Aris- tal difficulties’.5 The facts that allowed the opportunity to totle’s work or a coda at its conclusion. The recent Singa- re-evaluate consideration reflected the ebb and flow of pore Court of Appeal1 judgment of Gay Choon Ing v Loh friendship, captured by Aristotle in his Nicomachean Ethics Sze Ti Terence Peter2 (delivered by Andrew Phang JA) con- (Book VIII),6 and interestingly cited by the Court in a rare tained both, the latter of which an extensive judicial expo- judicial nod to classical literature.7 The appellant in Gay sition on the difficulties (and tentative solutions) relating to Choon Ing was a close friend of the respondent and was the contractual doctrine of consideration. This re-evalua- employed by the latter’s company in Kenya, ASP, until his tion of consideration at the slightest opportunity is unsur- resignation in 2004.
  • Lee Kuan Yew Continue to flow As Life Returns to Normal at a Market at Toa Payoh Lorong 8 on Wednesday, Three Days After the State Funeral Service

    Lee Kuan Yew Continue to flow As Life Returns to Normal at a Market at Toa Payoh Lorong 8 on Wednesday, Three Days After the State Funeral Service

    TODAYONLINE.COM WE SET YOU THINKING SUNDAY, 5 APRIL 2015 SPECIAL EDITION MCI (P) 088/09/2014 The tributes to the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew continue to flow as life returns to normal at a market at Toa Payoh Lorong 8 on Wednesday, three days after the State Funeral Service. PHOTO: WEE TECK HIAN REMEMBERING MR LEE KUAN YEW SPECIAL ISSUE 2 REMEMBERING LEE KUAN YEW Tribute cards for the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew by the PCF Sparkletots Preschool (Bukit Gombak Branch) teachers and students displayed at the Chua Chu Kang tribute centre. PHOTO: KOH MUI FONG COMMENTARY Where does Singapore go from here? died a few hours earlier, he said: “I am for some, more bearable. Servicemen the funeral of a loved one can tell you, CARL SKADIAN grieved beyond words at the passing of and other volunteers went about their the hardest part comes next, when the DEPUTY EDITOR Mr Lee Kuan Yew. I know that we all duties quietly, eiciently, even as oi- frenzy of activity that has kept the mind feel the same way.” cials worked to revise plans that had busy is over. I think the Prime Minister expected to be adjusted after their irst contact Alone, without the necessary and his past week, things have been, many Singaporeans to mourn the loss, with a grieving nation. fortifying distractions of a period of T how shall we say … diferent but even he must have been surprised Last Sunday, about 100,000 people mourning in the company of others, in Singapore. by just how many did.
  • Michael Green QC, Fountain Court

    Michael Green QC, Fountain Court

    Finance, Property and Business Litigation in a Changing World 25-26 April 2013 Supreme Court Auditorium Organisers: Finance, Property and Business Litigation in a Changing World Plenary Session 1: Finance Litigation Chairperson Mr Alvin Yeo SC , WongPartnership LLP Speakers Ms Geraldine Andrews QC, Essex Court Chambers Mr Peter de Verneuil Smith, 3Verulam Buildings Mr Hri Kumar Nair SC, Drew & Napier LLC FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES LITIGATION Geraldine Andrews Q.C. Essex Court Chambers The 2008 financial crisis Sept-Oct 2008 – the eye of the storm • 7th Sept - Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae effectively nationalized by US Government. • 14th Sept - Merrill Lynch shotgun wedding to Bank of America amidst fears of liquidity crisis • 15th Sept - Lehman Bros filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy protection. Periodically thereafter various of its subsidiaries did the same, including, on 3 Oct, LBSF, the dedicated subsidiary for derivative transactions. • 17th Sept - AIG, the USA䇻s largest insurer, was bailed out by US Govt with a loan of $85bn (insufficient funds to meet its CDS insurance obligations) Geraldine Andrews QC, Essex Court Chambers FINANCE, PROPERTY AND BUSINESS LITIGATION IN A CHANGING WORLD Sept-Oct 2008 – the eye of the storm • 17th Sept – Lloyds TSB takes over HBOS following a run on HBOS shares • 25th Sept – Washington Mutual sold to JP Morgan Chase for $1.9bn. • 3 Oct – US Congress approves 700bn bailout of the banks – the biggest financial rescue in US history. • 6-10 Oct - The worst week for the global stock market for 75 years. The Dow Jones index lost 22.1%, its worst week on record. Geraldine Andrews QC, Essex Court Chambers FINANCE, PROPERTY AND BUSINESS LITIGATION IN A CHANGING WORLD Sept-Oct 2008 – the eye of the storm • 7 Oct - Icelandic banking system collapses • 11 Oct Highest volatility day recorded in the 112 year history of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

  • Two Contrasting Approaches in the Interpretation of Outdated Statutory Provisions Yihan GOH Singapore Management University, [email protected]

    Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Research Collection School Of Law School of Law 12-2010 Two Contrasting Approaches in the Interpretation of Outdated Statutory Provisions Yihan GOH Singapore Management University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research Part of the Asian Studies Commons, Courts Commons, and the Legislation Commons Citation GOH, Yihan. Two Contrasting Approaches in the Interpretation of Outdated Statutory Provisions. (2010). Singapore Journal of Legal Studies. [2010], 530-545. Research Collection School Of Law. Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1415 This Journal Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Collection School Of Law by an authorized administrator of Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University. For more information, please email [email protected]. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies [2010] 530-545 Published in Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, [2010] pp 530-545. TWO CONTRASTING APPROACHES IN THE INTERPRETATION OF OUTDATED STATUTORY PROVISIONS WX v. WW' AAG v. Estate ofAAH, deceased2 GOH YIHAN* I. INTRODUCTION Some statutes in operation today were passed a long time ago. Inevitably, through the passage of time, social norms at the time of enactment may now be unrecognis- able. The legislative intent at the time of enactment may also seem outdated in more modem times. Judges interpreting specific provisions of these statutes may therefore encounter problems in ensuring a 'just' result in an instant case.