DOCSLIB.ORG

SOLID STATE PHYSICS PART II Optical Properties of Solids

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SOLID STATE PHYSICS PART II Optical Properties of Solids SOLID STATE PHYSICS PART II Optical Properties of Solids M. S. Dresselhaus i Contents 1 Review of Fundamental Relations for Optical Phenomena 1 1.1 Introductory Remarks on Optical Probes . 1 1.2 The Complex dielectric function and the complex optical conductivity . 2 1.3 Relation of Complex Dielectric Function to Observables . 4 1.4 Units for Frequency Measurements . 7 2 Drude Theory{Free Carrier Contribution to the Optical Properties 8 2.1 The Free Carrier Contribution . 8 2.2 Low Frequency Response: !¿ 1 . 10 ¿ 2.3 High Frequency Response; !¿ 1 . 11 À 2.4 The Plasma Frequency . 11 3 Interband Transitions 15 3.1 The Interband Transition Process . 15 3.1.1 Insulators . 18 3.1.2 Semiconductors . 18 3.1.3 Metals . 19 3.2 Form of the Hamiltonian in an Electromagnetic Field . 19 3.3 Relation between Momentum Matrix Elements and the E®ective Mass . 21 3.4 Spin-Orbit Interaction in Solids . 23 4 The Joint Density of States and Critical Points 27 4.1 The Joint Density of States . 27 4.2 Critical Points . 30 5 Absorption of Light in Solids 36 5.1 The Absorption Coe±cient . 36 5.2 Free Carrier Absorption in Semiconductors . 37 5.3 Free Carrier Absorption in Metals . 41 5.4 Direct Interband Transitions . 41 5.4.1 Temperature Dependence of Eg . 44 5.4.2 Dependence of the Absorption Edge on Fermi Energy . 47 5.4.3 Dependence of the Absorption Edge on Applied Electric Field . 48 5.5 Conservation of Crystal Momentum in Direct Optical Transitions . 50 5.6 Indirect Interband Transitions . 51 ii 6 Optical Properties of Solids Over a Wide Frequency Range 58 6.1 Kramers{Kronig Relations . 58 6.2 Optical Properties and Band Structure . 63 6.3 Modulated Reflectivity Experiments . 65 6.4 Ellipsometry and Measurement of Optical Constants . 71 7 Impurities and Excitons 75 7.1 Impurity Level Spectroscopy . 75 7.2 Shallow Impurity Levels . 75 7.3 Departures from the Hydrogenic Model . 79 7.4 Vacancies, Color Centers and Interstitials . 81 7.5 Spectroscopy of Excitons . 85 7.6 Classi¯cation of Excitons . 89 7.7 Optical Transitions in Quantum Well Structures . 93 8 Luminescence and Photoconductivity 99 8.1 Classi¯cation of Luminescence Processes . 99 8.2 Emission and Absorption . 101 8.3 Photoconductivity . 109 10 Optical Study of Lattice Vibrations 113 10.1 Lattice Vibrations in Semiconductors . 113 10.1.1 General Considerations . 113 10.2 Dielectric Constant and Polarizability . 115 10.3 Polariton Dispersion Relations . 117 10.4 Light Scattering . 126 10.5 Feynman Diagrams for Light Scattering . 131 10.6 Raman Spectra in Quantum Wells and Superlattices . 133 11 Non-Linear Optics 137 11.1 Introductory Comments . 137 11.2 Second Harmonic Generation . 139 11.2.1 Parametric Oscillation . 140 11.2.2 Frequency Conversion . 141 12 Electron Spectroscopy and Surface Science 142 12.1 Photoemission Electron Spectroscopy . 142 12.1.1 Introduction . 142 12.1.2 The Photoemission Process . 147 12.1.3 Energy Distribution Curves . 150 12.1.4 Angle Resolved Photoelectron Spectroscopy . 152 12.1.5 Synchrotron Radiation Sources . 152 12.2 Surface Science . 154 12.2.1 Introduction . 154 12.2.2 Electron Di®raction . 155 12.2.3 Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy, EELS . 159 12.2.4 Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES) . 161 iii 12.2.5 EXAFS . 163 12.2.6 Scanning Tunneling Microscopy . 164 13 Amorphous Semiconductors 172 13.1 Introduction . 172 13.1.1 Structure of Amorphous Semiconductors . 173 13.1.2 Electronic States . 174 13.1.3 Optical Properties . 180 13.1.4 Transport Properties . 182 13.1.5 Applications of Amorphous Semiconductors . 182 13.2 Amorphous Semiconductor Superlattices . 183 A Time Dependent Perturbation Theory 186 A.1 General Formulation . 186 A.2 Fermi Golden Rule . 190 A.3 Time Dependent 2nd Order Perturbation Theory . 191 B Harmonic Oscillators, Phonons, and the Electron-Phonon Interaction 193 B.1 Harmonic Oscillators . 193 B.2 Phonons . 195 B.3 Phonons in 3D Crystals . 196 B.4 Electron-Phonon Interaction . 199 C Organic Materials for Solid State Devices 202 iv Chapter 1 Review of Fundamental Relations for Optical Phenomena References: G. Beke¯ and A.H. Barrett, Electromagnetic Vibrations Waves and Radiation, MIT ² Press, Cambridge, MA J.D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, Wiley, New York, 1975 ² Bassani and Pastori{Parravicini, Electronic States and Optical Transitions in Solids, ² Pergamon Press, NY (1975). Yu and Cardona, Fundamentals of Semiconductors, Springer Verlag (1996) ² 1.1 Introductory Remarks on Optical Probes The optical properties of solids provide an important tool for studying energy band struc- ture, impurity levels, excitons, localized defects, lattice vibrations, and certain magnetic excitations. In such experiments, we measure some observable, such as reflectivity, trans- mission, absorption, ellipsometry or light scattering; from these measurements we deduce the dielectric function "(!), the optical conductivity σ(!), or the fundamental excitation frequencies. It is the frequency-dependent complex dielectric function "(!) or the complex conductivity σ(!), which is directly related to the energy band structure of solids. The central question is the relationship between experimental observations and the electronic energy levels (energy bands) of the solid. In the infrared photon energy region, information on the phonon branches is obtained. These issues are the major concern of Part II of this course. 1 1.2 The Complex dielectric function and the complex optical conductivity The complex dielectric function and complex optical conductivity are introduced through Maxwell's equations (c.g.s. units) 1 @D~ 4¼ H~ = ~j (1.1) r £ ¡ c @t c 1 @B~ E~ + = 0 (1.2) r £ c @t D~ = 0 (1.3) r ¢ B~ = 0 (1.4) r ¢ where we have assumed that the charge density is zero. The constitutive equations are written as: D~ = "E~ (1.5) B~ = ¹H~ (1.6) ~j = σE~ (1.7) Equation 1.5 de¯nes the quantity " from which the concept of the complex dielectric func- tion will be developed. When we discuss non{linear optics (see Chapter 11), these linear constitutive equations (Eqs. 1.5{1.7) must be generalized to include higher order terms in E~ E~ and E~ E~ E~ . From Maxwell's equations and the constitutive equations, we obtain a wave equation for the ¯eld variables E~ and H~ : "¹ @2E~ 4¼σ¹ @E~ 2E~ = + (1.8) r c2 @t2 c2 @t and "¹ @2H~ 4¼σ¹ @H~ 2H~ = + : (1.9) r c2 @t2 c2 @t For optical ¯elds, we must look for a sinusoidal solution to Eqs. 1.8 and 1.9 i(K~ ¢~r¡!t) E~ = E~0e (1.10) where K~ is a complex propagation constant and ! is the frequency of the light. A solution similar to Eq. 1.10 is obtained for the H~ ¯eld. The real part of K~ can be identi¯ed as a wave vector, while the imaginary part of K~ accounts for attenuation of the wave inside the solid. Substitution of the plane wave solution Eq. 1.10 into the wave equation Eq. 1.8 yields the following relation for K: "¹!2 4¼iσ¹! K2 = : (1.11) ¡ ¡ c2 ¡ c2 If there were no losses (or attenuation), K would be equal to ! K = p"¹ (1.12) 0 c 2 and would be real, but since there are losses we write ! K = p" ¹ (1.13) c complex where we have de¯ned the complex dielectric function as 4¼iσ " = " + = " + i" : (1.14) complex ! 1 2 As shown in Eq. 1.14 it is customary to write "1 and "2 for the real and imaginary parts of "complex. From the de¯nition in Eq. 1.14 it also follows that 4¼i "! 4¼i " = σ + = σ ; (1.15) complex ! 4¼i ! complex · ¸ where we de¯ne the complex conductivity σcomplex as: "! σ = σ + (1.16) complex 4¼i Now that we have de¯ned the complex dielectric function "complex and the complex conductivity σcomplex, we will relate these quantities in two ways: 1. to observables such as the reflectivity which we measure in the laboratory, 2. to properties of the solid such as the carrier density, relaxation time, e®ective masses, energy band gaps, etc. After substitution for K in Eq. 1.10, the solution Eq. 1.11 to the wave equation (Eq. 1.8) yields a plane wave ¡i!t !z 4¼iσ E~ (z; t) = E~0e exp i p"¹ 1 + : (1.17) 0 c s "! 1 @ A For the wave propagating in vacuum (" = 1, ¹ = 1, σ = 0), Eq. 1.17 reduces to a simple plane wave solution, while if the wave is propagating in a medium of ¯nite electrical conductivity, the amplitude of the wave exponentially decays over a characteristic distance ± given by c c ± = = (1.18) !N~2(!) !k~(!) where ± is called the optical skin depth, and k~ is the imaginary part of the complex index of refraction (also called the extinction coe±cient) 4¼iσ N~(!) = p¹"complex = "¹ 1 + = n~(!) + ik~(!): (1.19) "! s µ ¶ This means that the intensity of the electric ¯eld, E 2, falls o® to 1=e of its value at the j j surface in a distance 1 c = (1.20) ®abs 2!k~(!) 3 where ®abs(!) is the absorption coe±cient for the solid at frequency !. Since light is described by a transverse wave, there are two possible orthogonal direc- tions for the E~ vector in a plane normal to the propagation direction and these directions determine the polarization of the light. For cubic materials, the index of refraction is the same along the two transverse directions. However, for anisotropic media, the indices of refraction may be di®erent for the two polarization directions, as is further discussed in 2.1. x 1.3 Relation of Complex Dielectric Function to Observables In relating "complex and σcomplex to the observables, it is convenient to introduce a complex index of refraction N~complex N~complex = p¹"complex (1.21) where ! K = N~ (1.22) c complex and where N~complex is usually written in terms of its real and imaginary parts (see Eq.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 5 Optical Properties of Materials
    Chapter 5 Optical Properties of Materials Part I Introduction Classification of Optical Processes refractive index n() = c / v () Snell’s law absorption ~ resonance luminescence Optical medium ~ spontaneous emission a. Specular elastic and • Reflection b. Total internal Inelastic c. Diffused scattering • Propagation nonlinear-optics Optical medium • Transmission Propagation General Optical Process • Incident light is reflected, absorbed, scattered, and/or transmitted Absorbed: IA Reflected: IR Transmitted: IT Incident: I0 Scattered: IS I 0 IT IA IR IS Conservation of energy Optical Classification of Materials Transparent Translucent Opaque Optical Coefficients If neglecting the scattering process, one has I0 IT I A I R Coefficient of reflection (reflectivity) Coefficient of transmission (transmissivity) Coefficient of absorption (absorbance) Absorption – Beer’s Law dx I 0 I(x) Beer’s law x 0 l a is the absorption coefficient (dimensions are m-1). Types of Absorption • Atomic absorption: gas like materials The atoms can be treated as harmonic oscillators, there is a single resonance peak defined by the reduced mass and spring constant. v v0 Types of Absorption Paschen • Electronic absorption Due to excitation or relaxation of the electrons in the atoms Molecular Materials Organic (carbon containing) solids or liquids consist of molecules which are relatively weakly connected to other molecules. Hence, the absorption spectrum is dominated by absorptions due to the molecules themselves. Molecular Materials Absorption Spectrum of Water
    [Show full text]
  • Einstein and the Early Theory of Superconductivity, 1919–1922
    Einstein and the Early Theory of Superconductivity, 1919–1922 Tilman Sauer Einstein Papers Project California Institute of Technology 20-7 Pasadena, CA 91125, USA [email protected] Abstract Einstein’s early thoughts about superconductivity are discussed as a case study of how theoretical physics reacts to experimental find- ings that are incompatible with established theoretical notions. One such notion that is discussed is the model of electric conductivity implied by Drude’s electron theory of metals, and the derivation of the Wiedemann-Franz law within this framework. After summarizing the experimental knowledge on superconductivity around 1920, the topic is then discussed both on a phenomenological level in terms of implications of Maxwell’s equations for the case of infinite conduc- tivity, and on a microscopic level in terms of suggested models for superconductive charge transport. Analyzing Einstein’s manuscripts and correspondence as well as his own 1922 paper on the subject, it is shown that Einstein had a sustained interest in superconductivity and was well informed about the phenomenon. It is argued that his appointment as special professor in Leiden in 1920 was motivated to a considerable extent by his perception as a leading theoretician of quantum theory and condensed matter physics and the hope that he would contribute to the theoretical direction of the experiments done at Kamerlingh Onnes’ cryogenic laboratory. Einstein tried to live up to these expectations by proposing at least three experiments on the arXiv:physics/0612159v1 [physics.hist-ph] 15 Dec 2006 phenomenon, one of which was carried out twice in Leiden. Com- pared to other theoretical proposals at the time, the prominent role of quantum concepts was characteristic of Einstein’s understanding of the phenomenon.
    [Show full text]
  • Molding of Plasmonic Resonances in Metallic Nanostructures: Dependence of the Non-Linear Electric Permittivity on System Size and Temperature
    Materials 2013, 6, 4879-4910; doi:10.3390/ma6114879 OPEN ACCESS materials ISSN 1996-1944 www.mdpi.com/journal/materials Review Molding of Plasmonic Resonances in Metallic Nanostructures: Dependence of the Non-Linear Electric Permittivity on System Size and Temperature Alessandro Alabastri 1,*, Salvatore Tuccio 1, Andrea Giugni 1, Andrea Toma 1, Carlo Liberale 1, Gobind Das 1, Francesco De Angelis 1, Enzo Di Fabrizio 2,3 and Remo Proietti Zaccaria 1,* 1 Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Morego 30, Genova 16163, Italy; E-Mails: [email protected] (S.T.); [email protected] (A.G.); [email protected] (A.T.); [email protected] (C.L.); [email protected] (G.D.); [email protected] (F.A.) 2 King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Physical Science and Engineering (PSE) Division, Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering (BESE) Division, Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Bio-Nanotechnology and Engineering for Medicine (BIONEM), Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Magna Graecia Viale Europa, Germaneto, Catanzaro 88100, Italy * Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mails: [email protected] (A.A.); [email protected] (R.P.Z.); Tel.: +39-010-7178-247; Fax: +39-010-720-321. Received: 10 July 2013; in revised form: 8 October 2013 / Accepted: 10 October 2013 / Published: 25 October 2013 Abstract: In this paper, we review the principal theoretical models through which the dielectric function of metals can be described. Starting from the Drude assumptions for intraband transitions, we show how this model can be improved by including interband absorption and temperature effect in the damping coefficients.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Notes in Solid State 3
    Lecture notes in Solid State 3 Eytan Grosfeld Physics Department, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Classical free electron model for metals: The Drude model Recommended reading: • Chapter 1, Ashcroft & Mermin. The conductivity of metals is described very well by the classical Drude formula, ne2τ σ = (1.1) D m where m is the electronic mass (as decided by the band-structure) and e is the electronic charge. The conductivity is directly proportional to the electronic density n; and, to τ, the mean free time between collisions of the conducting electrons with defects that are generically present in the system: • Static defects that scatter the electron elastically, including: static impu- rities and structural defects. One can dene the elastic mean free time τe. • Dynamical defects which scatter the electron inelastically (as they can carry o energy) including: photons, other electrons, other excitations (such as plasmons). One can accordingly dene the inelastic mean free time τ'. The eciency of the latter processes depends on the temperature T : we expect it to increase as T is increased. At very low temperatures the dominant scattering is elastic, and then τ does not depend strongly on temperature but instead it depends on the amount of disorder (realized as random static impurities). We expect τ to decrease as the temperature or the amount of disorder in the system are increased. The Drude model 1897 - discovery of the electron (J. J. Thomson). 1900 - only three years later, Drude applied the kinetic theory of gases to a metal - considering it to be a gas of electrons. Assumptions: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 the Drude Theory of Metals
    Chapter 5 The Drude Theory of Metals • Basic assumption of Drude model • DC electrical conductivity of a metal • Hall effect • Thermal conductivity in a metal 1 Basic assumptions of Drude model * A “ gas of conduction electrons of mass m, which move against a background of heavy immobile ions Zρ Electron density n = .0 6022 ×10 24 m A .0 6022 ×10 24 Avogadro’s number ρm Mass density in g/cm 3 A Atomic mass in g/mole Z Number of electron each atom contribute rs Radius of a sphere whose volume is equal to the volume per conduction electron V 1 4 3 3/1 = = πr 3 r = N n 3 s s 4πn r s ~ 2 − 3 in typical metal a0 Bohr radius The density is typically 10 3 times greater than those of a classical gas at normal T and P. 2 * Between collisions the interaction of a given electron, both with others and with the ions, is neglected. * Coliisons in the Drude model are instantaneous events that abruptly alter the velocity of an electron. Drude attributed them to the electrons bouncing off the impenetrable ion cores. 1 * We shall assume that an electron experiences a collision with a probability per unit time τ Probability dt during time interval dt τ τ : relaxation time * Electrons are assumed to achieve thermal equilibrium with their surroundings only through collisons 3 DC Electrical Conductivity of a Metal r n electrons per unit volume all move with velocity v . n(vdt )A electrons will cross an area A perpendicular to the direction of flow.
    [Show full text]
  • Drude-Lorentz Analysis of the Optical Properties of The
    DRUDE-LORENTZ ANALYSIS OF THE OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF THE QUASI-TWO-DIMENSIONAL DICHALCOGENIDES 2H-NbSe2 AND 2H-TaSe2 A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Dinesh Marasinghe August, 2018 DRUDE-LORENTZ ANALYSIS OF THE OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF THE QUASI-TWO-DIMENSIONAL DICHALCOGENIDES 2H-NbSe2 AND 2H-TaSe2 Dinesh Marasinghe Thesis Approved: Accepted: Advisor Dean of the College Dr. Sasa V. Dordevic Dr. Linda Subich Faculty Reader Dean of the Graduate School Dr. Ben Yu-Kuang Hu Dr. Chand Midha Faculty Reader Date Dr. Sergei F. Lyuksyutov Department Chair Dr. Chris Ziegler ii ABSTRACT The reflectivity of a material basically depends on the collisions of free electrons. Existing spectroscopic reflectance data of two dichalcogenide materials, 2H-NbSe2 and 2H-TaSe2, is studied in this work. We analyzed this information with the Drude- Lorentz model for 2D electron gases. Using the program RefFIT, we explored the materials' reflectance and the conductivity and their dependance on temperature across frequencies ranging from infrared to ultraviolet. We examined both the in- plane (ab-plane) and out-of-plane (c-axis) components. In both materials, the ab- plane had greater reflectance and conductivity, with 2H-NbSe2 having the largest of both quantities. The anisotropy-direction dependence-effects are most pronounced in 2H-TaSe2. When frequency increased, collisions of free elections increased, decreasing the reflectance and conductivity. We also determined that the reflectance and the conductivity of the materials decreased with increased temperature for the same reason. Once the plasma edge was reached, interband transition occurred, causing an increase in conduction electrons and a decrease in both reflectance and conductivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Drude Model 1 in 1897, J. J. Thomson Discovered Electrons. in 1905
    Drude Model In 1897, J. J. Thomson discovered electrons. In 1905, Einstein interpreted the photoelectric effect In 1911 - Rutherford proved that atoms are composed of a point-like positively charged, massive nucleus surrounded by a sea of electrons. - Drude constructed his theory of electrical and thermal conduction in metals by (1) considering the electrons to be a gas of negatively charged particles traversing in a medium of uniformly distributed positive ions, and (2) applying the kinetic theory of gas to the electron sea. Below is a schematic diagram of Drude’s model of metals: (In 1922, Bohr was awarded the Nobel Prize for his contribution to the understanding of the structure of atoms. In late 1925, the Schrödinger equation was formulated.) Core electrons Zc e +Ze Zc e +Ze Zc e +Ze Zc e +Ze Positively charged ions Electron sea due to the delocalized valence electrons, (Z – Zc) from each atom. There is one important parameter of the model: (1) Electron number density, n 23 n = N/V = 6.02 x 10 x (Z Zc)m/A, (1.1) Avogadro’s number where N is the total number of electrons in the metal, V is the volume, m is the mass density, and A is the mass number. Note that only the valence electrons ((Z Zc) per atom) contribute to n. (2) Average electron separation, rs. 3 V/N = 1/n = (4/3) rs 1/3 rs = [3/(4n)] (1.2) 1 Drude Model The value of n varies from 0.911022/cm3 for Cs to 24.71022/cm3 for Be among different metals.
    [Show full text]
  • A Metamaterial Path Towards Optical Integrated Nanocircuits
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2015 A Metamaterial Path Towards Optical Integrated Nanocircuits Fereshteh Abbasi Mahmoudabadi University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Electrical and Electronics Commons, Electromagnetics and Photonics Commons, and the Optics Commons Recommended Citation Abbasi Mahmoudabadi, Fereshteh, "A Metamaterial Path Towards Optical Integrated Nanocircuits" (2015). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 1570. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1570 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1570 For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Metamaterial Path Towards Optical Integrated Nanocircuits Abstract Metamaterials are known to demonstrate exotic electromagnetic and optical properties. The extra control over manipulation of waves and fields afforded by metamaterials can be exploited towards exploring various platforms, e.g., optical integrated circuits. Nanophotonic integrated circuits have been the topic of past and ongoing research in multiple fields including, but not limited o,t electrical engineering, optics and materials science. In the present work, we theoretically study and analyze metamaterial properties that can be potentially utilized in the future design of optical integrated circuits. On this path, we seek inspiration from electronics to tackle multiple issues in developing such layered nanocircuitry. We identify modularity, directionality/isolation and tunability as three useful features of electronics and we theoretically explore mimicking them in nanoscale optics. Using epsilon-near-zero (ENZ) and mu-near- zero (MNZ) properties we propose concepts to transplant some aspects of modular design of electronic passive circuits and filters into nanophotonics. We also exploit ENZ materials to develop “transformer- like” functionality in optical nanocircuits.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTES on the DRUDE MODEL 1. Assumptions and Basics the Drude
    NOTES ON THE DRUDE MODEL KYLE MCELROY Abstract. Here are some notes about the classical theory of metals and the Drude model. The classical theory of electrons in metals is used to describe the basics of metallic behavior. These include their electrical conductivity, heat conductivity, reflection of optical wavelengths, etc. 1. Assumptions and basics The Drude model was developed at the turn of the 20th century by Paul Drude. It came a few years after J.J. Thompson discovered the electron in 1897. It predates quantum theory, but still can tell us a lot about electrons in metals. As background the the model we should get to know the electrons and how many we are dealing with. We're going to keep the valence assumption. This assumption rests on the intuition that the core electrons will be more tightly bound to their nuclei and hence will not be free to wander around and contribute to conduction. Essentially this lowers the number of electrons from Z to Zc where Zc is the number of conduction electrons. So in a sample of metal say Sodium (Na) the density of conduction electrons, n is: (1.1) Z ½ 1e=atom ¢ 1 £ 106g=m3 n = N c m = 6:02 £ 1023atoms=mol = 2 £ 1028e=m3 A A 29g=mol where NA is Avogadro's number, ½m is the density of the metal, A is the atomic number of the element and the numbers are for Na. For the actual model we're going to eliminate all the electron ion interactions and replace them by a single parameter.
    [Show full text]
  • Drude Model for Dielectric Constant of Metals
    Drude Model for dielectric constant of metals. • Conduction Current in Metals • EM Wave Propagation in Metals • Skin Depth • Plasma Frequency Ref : Prof. Robert P. Lucht, Purdue University Drude model z Drude model : Lorenz model (Harmonic oscillator model) without restoration force (that is, free electrons which are not bound to a particular nucleus) Linear Dielectric Response of Matter ConductionConduction CurrentCurrent inin MetalsMetals The equation of motion of a free electron (not bound to a particular nucleus; C = 0), rr r dr2 r m druurruu dv r mCreEmmveE=− −e − ⇒ +γ =− eeedt 2 τ dt dt 1 (τ =≈ : relaxation time 10−14 s) Lorentz model γ (Harmonic oscillator model) If C = 0, it is called Drude model The current density is defined : r ⎡⎤C J=− N evr with units of ⎣⎦⎢⎥sm− 2 Substituting in the equation of motion we obtain : r dJrr⎛⎞ N e2 +=γ JE⎜⎟ dt⎝⎠ me ConductionConduction CurrentCurrent inin MetalsMetals Assume that the applied electric field and the conduction current density are given by : rr rr Local approximation E=− Eexp() itωω J =− J exp () it 00to the current-field relation Substituting into the equation of motion we obtain : r dJ⎡⎤exp − iω t ⎣⎦0 () rrr +−=−−+−γωωωγωJitiJitJitexp() exp () exp () dt 000 ⎛⎞Ne2 r =−⎜⎟Eit0 exp()ω ⎝⎠me Multiplying through byexp()+ iω t : rr⎛⎞Ne2 ()−+iJωγ 00 =⎜⎟ E ⎝⎠me rr⎛⎞Ne2 or equivalently()−+ iωγ J =⎜⎟ E ⎝⎠me ConductionConduction CurrentCurrent inin MetalsMetals For static fields()ω = 0: we obtain rrr⎛⎞Ne22 Ne J==⇒==⎜⎟ Eσσ E static conductivity ⎝⎠mmeeγγ For the general case of an oscillating applied field : rrr⎡⎤σ J==⎢⎥ Eσσωω E = dynamic conductivity ⎣⎦1/− ()iωγ For very low frequencies,1,()ωγ << the dynamicconductivity is purely real and the electrons follow the electric field.
    [Show full text]
  • Condensed Matter Physics I: 2015-2016 Introduction, Drude Model
    Condensed matter physics I: 2015-2016 Introduction, Drude model R. Ganesh 1 Introduction Condensed matter physics (CMP) is the study of systems with many interact- ing particles. The adjective `condensed' should be understood as the opposite of `dilute' { the constituent particles are so close to each other that their interac- tions cannot be ignored. Some typical examples of `condensed' systems include electrons in a metal, spins in an insulating magnet, neutrons in a neutron star, Na atoms in an ultracold atomic gas, He atoms in liquid He, etc. Historically, the field grew out solid state physics. It used to be called 'solid state physics' until 1967 when Phil Anderson and Volker Heine coined the term `condensed matter physics'. CMP serves as a counterpoint to the `reductionism'. In the reductionist ap- proach, complex systems are studied by breaking them down into smaller, funda- mental units. This is exemplified by particle accelerator physics in which atoms are broken down into nucleons, which are further broken down into quarks, etc. In the condensed matter point of view, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. For example, we may understand how a single He atom behaves according to the laws of quantum mechanics. However, that does not tell us how a beaker with liquid He will behave. Completely unforeseen behaviour (superfluidity in this case) can emerge from the interactions of many constituent particles. The new physics that emerges from collective behaviour at different length scales is the domain of condensed matter physics. There are two broad (not necessarily mutually exclusive) divisions within CMP.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Electronic Structure of Solids Uwe Bovensiepen, Silke Biermann, and Luca Perfetti
    j1 1 The Electronic Structure of Solids Uwe Bovensiepen, Silke Biermann, and Luca Perfetti The discussion of dynamics at interfaces is based on the motion of ion cores and electronic excitations that are mostly optically driven. Hence, the electronic structure is of fundamental importance here. In solids such as molecular or ionic crystals, the valence electron distribution is not considerably distorted from the respective isolated atoms, ions, or molecules. Hence, their cohesion is entirely given by the classical potential energy of negligibly deformed electron distributions of bare particles, and van der Waals or Coulomb interactions are responsible for the formation of solid materials. This ceases to be so in metals and covalent crystals because the valence electron distribution plays the decisive role in bonding the constituents to a solid. In turn, the valence electron distribution can be considerably modified from the isolated atom or ion. A general description of solids must, therefore, consider the electronic structure in the first place. Fur- thermore, the dynamical processes discussed in this book are mostly optically excited or electron mediated. This chapter introduces the basic concepts widely used in the description of the electronic structure in solid materials. In Section 1.1, we present the description of the nearly free electron approximation that is motivated by optical excitations of a solid following the Drude model. We introduce the Fermi sphere and the dispersion of electronic bands in momentum space. In Section 1.2, the influence of the periodic potential in a crystal is considered, which leads to the description of the electronic band structure by Blochs theory for delocalized states.
    [Show full text]