DOCSLIB.ORG

Meeting Minutes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Meeting Minutes Thurston County Opioid Response Task Force July 06, 2020 from 3:00pm-5:00pm Thurston County Public Health & Social Services Department Zoom Meeting – Virtual Only AGENDA Description Action Steps/Items Welcome / Schelli Slaughter welcomed everyone to the meeting and noted that introductions would be done during the roundtable, due to being Review Minutes / hosted virtually. The March minutes and the May agenda were approved without updates. Review Agenda Meth & Polysubstance Dr. Caleb Banta-Green, Principal Research Scientist at University of Washington’s Alcohol & Drug Abuse Institute (UW ADAI), presented Use information methamphetamine and polysubstance use (see slides for more information). Dr. Banta-Green explained that a survey is conducted at syringe service programs in Washington every two years, with the intention of gathering data around substance use and related behaviors. Data collected during this survey includes substance(s) used in the prior 3 months, method of consumption (smoking, intravenous, snorting etc.), level of interest in stopping or reduction use, etc. Dr. Banta- Green shared 2019 Thurston County survey data on the number of individuals who reported being somewhat or very interested in wanting to stop or reduce their use – about half of individuals who use stimulants and three-quarters of individuals who use opioids. He expanded on this information, sharing data on the types of help which individuals reported they would be interested in – with the primary response being Medication for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD). It was explained that many individuals continue to use opioids to avoid feeling bad or experience withdrawal, whereas individuals who use stimulants report a functional benefits as the reason for their use, including: energy to not be victimized at night while sleeping outside, depression relief, energy to work, preventing opioid withdrawal symptoms, etc. The impacts of other substance use on MOUD for opioid use were explored, specifically relating to initial access to treatment and continuation once treatment is initiated. Dr. Banta-Green discussed the barrier of MOUD programs prohibiting polysubstance use or continued use, specifically when a majority of individuals report using multiple substances. He emphasized that many more individuals could access Medication Assisted Treatment if people could start/stay on MOUD while using other substances. This is attributed due individuals lessening opportunities for meth use and allowing time to work on issues during meth use after their opioid use is managed. Dr. Banta-Green shared data relating the positive impact which this can have on treatment engagement from the evaluation of the Bupe Pathways, a low-barrier buprenorphine (MOUD) program in Seattle. Dr. Banta-Green shared that there is not currently an approved medication for the treatment of stimulant use like there is for opioid use (Suboxone/buprenorphine, Methadone, Vivitrol/naltrexone). Initial research on medication-based treatment for stimulant use have explored a range of pharmaceutical intervention possibilities, which are: promising practices, have mixed results, or have modest yet significant impacts. Data from such studies was shared, including the use of methylphenidate (Ritalin) and dextroamphetamine (Adderall). He also noted that long-term engagement in treatment is helpful when exploring potential treatment and supportive services for stimulant use, as cognitive deficits are long-lasting for methamphetamine (6-18 months). The engagement can be encouraged through motivational interviewing and acknowledging the positive benefits which the person experiences from their use. Discussion – Race, Mary Ann O’Garro shared the importance of the intersection between race equity and the Thurston County Response Plan. Goal 5 of Equity, and Goal 5 of the the Response Plan focuses on strategies to address stigma and the risk of overdose specifically in diverse communities and in Response Plan populations which are disproportionately affected by the opioid epidemic. Mary Ann requested that the Task Force brainstorm what could be done relating to race equity and addressing the topic within the Task Force, such as specific trainings or presentations from subject matter experts. Jon Tunheim suggested the need to expand the scope of the strategies within the Task Force to include all substances, rather than focusing exclusively on opioid use – especially after the presentation from Dr. Caleb Banta-Green. He included that this would mirror the direction the State is headed, as the Washington State Opioid Response Plan broadens to become the State Opioid and Overdose Response Plan. Katie Strozyk suggested the Task Force look at Thurston County data to see if there have been disparities in overdoses, both fatal and non-fatal. She included the need to explore interventions which would prevent future disparities from arising, as well as address any historic disparities from worsening. Keylee Marineau emphasized the need to center voices of black and brown individuals, both who work in systems and who access these systems. She included that these race equity conversations cannot be siloed into topic specific vacuums, as this fails to address the larger issue of racism. In avoiding siloed responses, she urged that work should be connective to current efforts in the community and other response plans (Thurston County Homeless Crisis Response Plan, etc.) and conducted in a manner which is transformative in creating meaningful long-term change. Larry Jefferson suggested the book Beyond Inclusion, Beyond Empowerment by Leticia Nieto, as it dives. He suggested having her as a presenter at a future Task Force meeting, sharing glowing remarks from attending a training she hosted previously. He spoke to the need to acknowledge how coercive the legal system currently is and look towards diversifying responses outside of the legal system and other traditional methods - specifically the need to focus on restorative justice across all areas and decrease the reliance on court- based responses. Mary Ann shared that Thurston County Public Health is currently working with other local health jurisdictions and the Washington State Department of Health to advocate for modifications to the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey to include questions which would measure the impact which race and discrimination have on access to care and health outcomes. Meta Hogan commented that the growing up and living in a racist culture is a stressor for everyone and that addressing how these stressors impact disordered substance use would have a positive impact for a wide variety of people in the community. Marianne Clear shared that the current Addressing Pre-Trial Policy & Research (APPR) 5-year technical assistance project that is underway in Thurston County is looking at data points and exploring the pre-trial system through a racial lens while looking at systemic changes and impact. Schelli Slaughter shared that the Thurston County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) and Board of Health (BOH) discussed how other jurisdictions have declared racism as a public health crisis and are interested in engaging in further conversations around Thurston County data. Commissioner Tye Menser shared that the BOCC/BOH looked at the Pierce County and King County, which both focus on evaluating current policies, and discussed whether a declaration is the appropriate vehicle in moving this work forward – while acknowledging that work will move forward regardless of whether a declaration is made. SMART Objective Update Katie Strozyk provided an update on the adjustments which work groups have submitted regarding their previously set SMART objectives. These revisions to the SMART objectives are being made due to the variety of changes and barriers which have arisen due to COVID-19 response. Katie shared information regarding the following adjustments: • Total SMART objectives = 33 • Objectives complete (as of June 30, 2020) = 8 • Objectives stayed the same = 8 • Objectives revised = 10 • Objectives in review/need more information = 5 • Objectives dropped = 2 Katie Strozyk reported that the Naloxone work group adjusted their goals due to limitations on the ability to hold overdose response trainings and still being unsure as to what form Overdose Awareness Day will operate in with restrictions on social gatherings changing on a continual basis. The main adjustment was to the number of trainings which will be held, due to an inability to offer trainings for multiple months as well as shifting from an in-person training model to a virtual platform. Jon Tunheim shared that the Criminal Justice work group decreased their metrics but kept their overall objectives the same. This decrease accommodates for the Innovative Justice group being unable to convene temporarily earlier in 2020. Jason Bean-Mortinson reported that Treatment work group has tentatively decided to keep their objectives the same. They plan on moving any in-person gatherings within their objectives to a virtual platform. Mary Ann O’Garro shared that the Prevention work group is primarily revising metrics and timelines on their SMART objectives. These revisions allow for objectives which had an in-person element to be moved to a virtual format, as well as adjusting community messaging methods to consider current stressors and information overload due related COVID-19. For the Data work group, timelines are being revised on current objectives. One objective was dropped
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub
    US 20130289061A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0289061 A1 Bhide et al. (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 31, 2013 (54) METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS TO Publication Classi?cation PREVENT ADDICTION (51) Int. Cl. (71) Applicant: The General Hospital Corporation, A61K 31/485 (2006-01) Boston’ MA (Us) A61K 31/4458 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. (72) Inventors: Pradeep G. Bhide; Peabody, MA (US); CPC """"" " A61K31/485 (201301); ‘4161223011? Jmm‘“ Zhu’ Ansm’ MA. (Us); USPC ......... .. 514/282; 514/317; 514/654; 514/618; Thomas J. Spencer; Carhsle; MA (US); 514/279 Joseph Biederman; Brookline; MA (Us) (57) ABSTRACT Disclosed herein is a method of reducing or preventing the development of aversion to a CNS stimulant in a subject (21) App1_ NO_; 13/924,815 comprising; administering a therapeutic amount of the neu rological stimulant and administering an antagonist of the kappa opioid receptor; to thereby reduce or prevent the devel - . opment of aversion to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Also (22) Flled' Jun‘ 24’ 2013 disclosed is a method of reducing or preventing the develop ment of addiction to a CNS stimulant in a subj ect; comprising; _ _ administering the CNS stimulant and administering a mu Related U‘s‘ Apphcatlon Data opioid receptor antagonist to thereby reduce or prevent the (63) Continuation of application NO 13/389,959, ?led on development of addiction to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Apt 27’ 2012’ ?led as application NO_ PCT/US2010/ Also disclosed are pharmaceutical compositions comprising 045486 on Aug' 13 2010' a central nervous system stimulant and an opioid receptor ’ antagonist.
    [Show full text]
  • Methylphenidate Versus Dexamphetamine in Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: a Double-Blind, Crossover Trial
    Methylphenidate Versus Dexamphetamine in Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Double-blind, Crossover Trial Daryl Efron, FRACP; Frederick Jarman, FRACP; and Melinda Barker, Grad Dip Ed Psych ABSTRACT. Objective. To compare methylphenidate behavioral, academic, and social functioning. Many (MPH) and dexamphetamine (DEX) in a sample of chil- well-designed, placebo-controlled studies have dem- dren with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder onstrated beyond doubt the benefits of stimulants in (ADHD). the vast majority of children with ADHD.2–4 In a Method. A total of 125 children with ADHD received review of 110 studies on the effects of stimulant both MPH (0.3 mg/kg twice daily) and DEX (0.15 mg/kg drugs on more than 4200 children with ADHD, twice daily) for 2 weeks a double-blind, crossover study. 4 ; Outcome measures were Conners’ Parent Rating Scale– Barkley found that 75% of subjects were regarded Revised, Conners’ Teacher Rating Scale–Revised, a Par- as improved on stimulants. The mean placebo re- ent Global Perceptions questionnaire, the Continuous sponse was 39%. Performance Test, and the Barkley Side Effects Rating Methylphenidate (MPH) and dexamphetamine Scale. (DEX) are the two stimulants prescribed most fre- Results. There were significant group mean im- quently and have been shown to have similar types provements from baseline score on all measures for of positive effects in children with ADHD. However, both stimulants. On the Conners’ Teacher Rating Scal- it is not known whether one is more efficacious than e–Revised, response was greater on MPH than DEX on the other in terms of probability of producing a the conduct problems and hyperactivity factors, as well positive response, magnitude of response, quality of as on the hyperactivity index.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs
    Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES • Public Health Service • Alcohol Drug Abuse and Mental Health Administration Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs Editors: Khursheed Asghar, Ph.D. Division of Preclinical Research National Institute on Drug Abuse Errol De Souza, Ph.D. Addiction Research Center National Institute on Drug Abuse NIDA Research Monograph 94 1989 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration National Institute on Drug Abuse 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, DC 20402 Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs ACKNOWLEDGMENT This monograph is based upon papers and discussion from a technical review on pharmacology and toxicology of amphetamine and related designer drugs that took place on August 2 through 4, 1988, in Bethesda, MD. The review meeting was sponsored by the Biomedical Branch, Division of Preclinical Research, and the Addiction Research Center, National Institute on Drug Abuse. COPYRIGHT STATUS The National Institute on Drug Abuse has obtained permission from the copyright holders to reproduce certain previously published material as noted in the text. Further reproduction of this copyrighted material is permitted only as part of a reprinting of the entire publication or chapter. For any other use, the copyright holder’s permission is required. All other matieral in this volume except quoted passages from copyrighted sources is in the public domain and may be used or reproduced without permission from the Institute or the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Methamphetamine (Canadian Drug Summary)
    www.ccsa.ca • www.ccdus.ca March 2020 Canadian Drug Summary Methamphetamine Key Points • The prevalence of methamphetamine use in the Canadian population is low (~0.2%). • Several jurisdictions report at least a three-fold increase in the use of methamphetamine over the past five years among individuals accessing treatment or harm reduction services. • Notable increases for rates of criminal violations involving methamphetamine have been observed in the last five years (2013–2018). Introduction Methamphetamine is a synthetic drug classified as a central nervous system (CNS) stimulant or psychostimulant. CNS stimulants cover a wide range of substances that act on the body by increasing the level of activity of the CNS and include caffeine, nicotine, amphetamine (e.g., Adderall®), methylphenidate (e.g., Ritalin®), MDMA (“ecstasy”), cocaine (including crack cocaine) and methamphetamine (including crystal meth).1,2 While both methamphetamine and amphetamine are psychostimulants and often grouped together, they are different drugs. A slight chemical modification of amphetamine produces methamphetamine, which has a different pharmacological profile that results in a larger release of certain neurochemicals in the brain and a stronger and more rapid physiological response. Some amphetamines are prescribed in Canada for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and narcolepsy (e.g., Adderall and Vyvanse®), but methamphetamine use is currently illegal. Methamphetamine is often made in illegal, clandestine laboratories with commonly available, inexpensive chemicals, such as ephedrine and pseudoephedrine, found in medications, among other sources. The use of these medications as precursor chemicals for methamphetamine led to stricter regulations introduced in Canada in 2006, limiting access to them by requiring they be kept behind the counter of pharmacies.3 Illegal production can be dangerous due to the toxicity of the chemicals used and the high risk of explosions.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphetamine/Dextroamphetamine IR Generic
    GEORGIA MEDICAID FEE-FOR-SERVICE STIMULANT AND RELATED AGENTS PA SUMMARY Preferred Non-Preferred Amphetamine/dextroamphetamine IR generic Adzenys ER (amphetamine ER oral suspension) Armodafinil generic Adzenys XR (amphetamine ER dispersible tab) Atomoxetine generic Amphetamine/dextroamphetamine ER (generic Concerta (methylphenidate ER/SA) Adderall XR) Dextroamphetamine IR tablets generic Aptensio XR (methylphenidate ER) Focalin (dexmethylphenidate) Clonidine ER generic Focalin XR (dexmethylphenidate ER) Cotempla XR (methylphenidate ER disintegrating Guanfacine ER generic tablet) Methylin oral solution (methylphenidate) Daytrana (methylphenidate TD patch) Methylphenidate CD/CR/ER generic by Lannett Desoxyn (methamphetamine) [NDCs 00527-####-##] and Kremers Urban [NDCs Dexmethylphenidate IR generic 62175-####-##] (generic Metadate CD) Dexmethylphenidate ER generic Methylphenidate IR generic Dextroamphetamine ER capsules generic Modafinil generic Dextroamphetamine oral solution generic Quillichew ER (methylphenidate ER chew tabs) Dyanavel XR (amphetamine ER oral suspension) Quillivant XR (methylphenidate ER oral suspension) Evekeo (amphetamine tablets) Vyvanse (lisdexamfetamine) Methamphetamine generic Zenzedi 5 mg, 10 mg IR tablets (dextroamphetamine) Methylphenidate IR chewable tablets generic Methylphenidate ER/SA (generic Concerta) Methylphenidate ER/LA/SR (generic Ritalin LA, Ritalin SR, Metadate ER) Methylphenidate ER/SA 72 mg generic Methylphenidate oral solution generic Mydayis (amphetamine/dextroamphetamine ER) Ritalin LA 10 mg
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Ritalin and Adderall: Efficacy and Time-Course in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
    A Comparison of Ritalin and Adderall: Efficacy and Time-course in Children With Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder William E. Pelham, PhD*; Helen R. Aronoff, MD‡; Jill K. Midlam, MA*; Cheri J. Shapiro, PhD*; Elizabeth M. Gnagy, BS*; Andrea M. Chronis, BS*; Adia N. Onyango, BS*; Gregory Forehand, BS*; Anh Nguyen, BS*; and James Waxmonsky, MD‡ ABSTRACT. Objective. Very little research has fo- ratings were also made for evening behavior to assess cused on the efficacy of Adderall (Shire-Richwood Inc, possible rebound, and side effects ratings were obtained Florence, KY) in the treatment of children with attention- from parents, counselors, and teachers. Parents, counsel- deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and no studies ors, and teachers also rated their perceptions of medica- have compared it with standardized doses of Ritalin tion status and whether they recommended the contin- (Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ). It is ued use of the medication given that day. Finally, a thought that Adderall has a longer half-life than Ritalin clinical team made recommendations for treatment tak- and might minimize the loss of efficacy that occurs 4 or 5 ing into account each child’s individual response. hours after Ritalin ingestion. We compared two doses of Results. Both drugs were routinely superior to pla- Ritalin and Adderall in the treatment of ADHD in chil- cebo and produced dramatic improvements in rates of dren in an acute study and assessed the medications’ negative behavior, academic productivity, and staff/par- time courses. ent ratings of behavior. The doses of Adderall that were Design. Within-subject, double-blind, placebo-con- assessed produced greater improvement than did the as- trolled, crossover design lasting 6 weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • (Adhd) Quantity Limitation Utilization Management Criteria
    ATTENTION- DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER (ADHD) QUANTITY LIMITATION UTILIZATION MANAGEMENT CRITERIA DRUG CLASS: Stimulants and Non-Stimulants BRAND (generic) NAMES: Adderall® (amphetamine/dextroamphetamine) Adderall XR® (amphetamine/ dextroamphetamine ER) Adzenys XR-ODTTM (amphetamine ER dispersible) Aptensio XR® (methylphenidate ER) Concerta® (methylphenidate ER) Daytrana® (methylphenidate transdermal patch) Dextroampthetamine (DextroStat®) Dexedrine® (dextroamphetamine ER) DyanavelTM XR (amphetamine ER) Focalin XR® (dexmethylphenidate ER) Focalin® (dexmethylphenidate) Intuniv® (guanfacine ER) Kapvay® (clonidine ER) Metadate CD® (methylphenidate ER) Metadate ER® (methylphenidate ER) Methylin® (methylphenidate) Procentra® (dextroamphetamine) QuillichewTM (methylphenidate ER) Quillivant XR® (methylphenidate ER) Ritalin® (methylphenidate) Ritalin® LA (methylphenidate ER) Ritalin® SR (methylphenidate ER) Strattera® (atomoxetine) Vyvanse® (lisdexamphetamine) Zenzedi® (dextroamphetamine) COVERAGE AUTHORIZATION CRITERIA Non-formulary medications - Medications included in this criterion that are not part of ASO Net Results or Essential Formularies are subject to a trial and failure of up to TWO formulary alternatives that are clinically appropriate, to treat the same condition, prior to approval (see Non-formulary Exception Criteria for detailed limitations). Quantities above the program set limit (see pgs 2-4) for ADHD agents will be approved when the following is met: 1. The quantity (dose) requested is for documented titration purposes at the initiation of therapy (authorization for a 90 day titration period); AND 2. The prescribed dose cannot be achieved using a lesser quantity of a higher strength; AND 3. The quantity (dose) requested does not exceed the maximum FDA labeled dose, when specified, or to the safest studied dose per the manufacturer’s product insert; OR BLUE CROSS®, BLUE SHIELD® and the Cross and Shield Symbols are registered marks of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, an association of independent Blue Cross and Blue Shield Plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Stimulant and Related Medications: US Food and Drug
    Stimulant and Related Medications: U.S. Food and Drug Administration-Approved Indications and Dosages for Use in Adults The therapeutic dosing recommendations for stimulant and related medications are based on U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved product labeling. Nevertheless, the dosing regimen is adjusted according to a patient’s individual response to pharmacotherapy. The FDA-approved dosages and indications for the use of stimulant and related medications in adults are provided in this table. All medication doses listed are for oral administration. Information on the generic availability of the stimulant and related medications can be found by searching the Electronic Orange Book at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/ob/default.cfm on the FDA website. Generic Medication Indication Dosing Information Other Information Availability amphetamine/dextroamphetamine ADHD Initial dose: May increase daily dose by 5 mg at Yes mixed salts[1] 5 mg once or twice a day; weekly intervals until optimal response Maximum dose: 40 mg per day is achieved. Only in rare cases will it be necessary to exceed a total of 40 mg per day. amphetamine/dextroamphetamine narcolepsy Initial dose: 10 mg per day; May increase daily dose by 10 mg at Yes mixed salts Usual dose: weekly intervals until optimal response 5 mg to 60 mg per day is achieved. Take first dose in divided doses upon awakening. amphetamine/dextroamphetamine ADHD Recommended dose: Patients switching from regular-release Yes mixed salts ER*[2] 20 mg once a day amphetamine/dextroamphetamine mixed salts may take the same total daily dose once a day. armodafinil[3] narcolepsy Recommended dose: Take as a single dose in the morning.
    [Show full text]
  • What Every Clinician Should Know Before Starting a Patient on Meds
    CARING FOR CHILDREN WITH ADHD: A RESOURCE TOOLKIT FOR CLINICIANS, 2ND EDITION Basic Facts: What Every Clinician Should Know Before Starting a Patient on Medication Studies have shown that treatment for attention-deficit/ • If you reach the maximum recommended dose without • hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with medication is effective in noticeable improvement in symptoms, try a different stimulant treating the symptoms of ADHD alone or in combination with medication class. Approximately 80% of children will respond to behavioral interventions. at least 1 of the 2 stimulant classes tried. • Stimulant medications also improve academic productivity but • When changing medications, be careful about the dose not cognitive abilities or academic skills. equivalence of different stimulant medication classes; in general, equivalent doses for dexmethylphenidate and Stimulants can help reduce oppositional, aggressive, impulsive, • amphetamine-based stimulants are approximately half of a and delinquent behaviors in some children. methylphenidate dose. Several types of medications are Food and Drug Administration Non-stimulant medications may require 2 or more weeks to see • (FDA)-approved for the treatment of ADHD. • effects, so you should titrate up more slowly than you would • Stimulant medications: methylphenidate, dexmethylphenidate, for stimulant medications. Obtaining follow-up rating scales is dextroamphetamine, mixed amphetamine salts, even more important than for stimulant medications because lisdexamfetamine changes are more gradual. • Non-stimulant medications: atomoxetine, and extended-release • Managing side effects effectively can improve adherence to and guanfacine and clonidine satisfaction with stimulant medications. When choosing which stimulant and dose to start first, consider • Common side effects to discuss with families include • stomachache, headache, decreased appetite, sleep problems, Family preference and experience with the medication, including • and behavioral rebound.
    [Show full text]
  • Alcohol Mixed with Other Drugs
    Alcohol Mixed with Other Drugs Stimulants Stimulants or “uppers”: Drugs that temporarily +increase alertness and energy Examples: Adderall, Ritalin, cocaine, methamphetamine FOCUS: Alcohol + Adderall Adderall: Used to treat ADHD and narcolepsy. Some students misuse Adderall in hopes it will help them study. “Misuse” is defined as taking a medication that was not prescribed to you, taking more Alcohol than what was prescribed to you or taking it for a dierent purpose than prescribed. Eects: Because alcohol is a depressant Use CUPS to remember the and Adderall is a stimulant, Adderall will symptoms of alcohol poisoning: mask alcohol’s eects. Mixing alcohol with • Cold, clammy, pale or bluish skin. a stimulant makes you less aware of alcohol's • Unconscious or unable to be roused. intoxicating eects, which can result in an • Puking repeatedly or uncontrollably. overdose or death. Additionally, mixing alcohol with Adderall (or any other stimulant) • Slow or irregular breathing. can cause an irregular heartbeat and cause cardiovascular complications. Stat: 4.3 percent of UC Davis undergraduates reported using a prescription stimulant in the last 12 months that was not prescribed to them. Sedative Depressants or “downers”: Sedating drugs +that reduce stimulation Examples: opiates, Xanax, Valium FOCUS: Alcohol + Opiates/Opioids Opiates: A group of drugs that are used for treating pain -examples: heroin, morphine, codeine, oxycontin, vicodin, fentanyl Alcohol Eects: When alcohol and opioids are Symptoms: taken at the same time, the sedative • Slow or irregular breathing eects of both drugs will magnify. This • Lowered pulse and can depress or even stop involuntary blood pressure functions, such as breathing, and will • Unconscious or unable increase the risk of overdose and death.
    [Show full text]
  • Phenylmorpholines and Analogues Thereof Phenylmorpholine Und Analoge Davon Phenylmorpholines Et Analogues De Celles-Ci
    (19) TZZ __T (11) EP 2 571 858 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.: of the grant of the patent: C07D 265/30 (2006.01) A61K 31/5375 (2006.01) 20.06.2018 Bulletin 2018/25 A61P 25/24 (2006.01) A61P 25/16 (2006.01) A61P 25/18 (2006.01) (21) Application number: 11723158.9 (86) International application number: (22) Date of filing: 20.05.2011 PCT/US2011/037361 (87) International publication number: WO 2011/146850 (24.11.2011 Gazette 2011/47) (54) PHENYLMORPHOLINES AND ANALOGUES THEREOF PHENYLMORPHOLINE UND ANALOGE DAVON PHENYLMORPHOLINES ET ANALOGUES DE CELLES-CI (84) Designated Contracting States: • DECKER, Ann Marie AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB Durham, North Carolina 27713 (US) GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR (74) Representative: Hoeger, Stellrecht & Partner Patentanwälte mbB (30) Priority: 21.05.2010 US 347259 P Uhlandstrasse 14c 70182 Stuttgart (DE) (43) Date of publication of application: 27.03.2013 Bulletin 2013/13 (56) References cited: WO-A1-2004/052372 WO-A1-2008/026046 (73) Proprietors: WO-A1-2008/087512 DE-B- 1 135 464 • Research Triangle Institute FR-A- 1 397 563 GB-A- 883 220 Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 GB-A- 899 386 US-A1- 2005 267 096 (US) • United States of America, as represented by • R.A. GLENNON ET AL.: "Beta-Oxygenated The Secretary, Department of Health and Human Analogues of the 5-HT2A Serotonin Receptor Services Agonist Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7660 (US) 1-(4-Bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-aminopro pane", JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, (72) Inventors: vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronic Amphetamine Exposure Causes Long Term Effects on Dopamine Uptake in Cultured Cells Nafisa Ferdous
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects January 2016 Chronic Amphetamine Exposure Causes Long Term Effects On Dopamine Uptake In Cultured Cells Nafisa Ferdous Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Recommended Citation Ferdous, Nafisa, "Chronic Amphetamine Exposure Causes Long Term Effects On Dopamine Uptake In Cultured Cells" (2016). Theses and Dissertations. 2016. https://commons.und.edu/theses/2016 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHRONIC AMPHETAMINE EXPOSURE CAUSES LONG TERM EFFECTS ON DOPAMINE UPTAKE IN CULTURED CELLS By Nafisa Ferdous Bachelor of Science, North South University, Bangladesh 2012 A Thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Grand Forks, North Dakota December 2016 ii PERMISSION Title Chronic amphetamine exposure causes long term effects on dopamine uptake in cultured cells Department Biomedical Sciences Degree Master of Science In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a graduate degree from the University of North Dakota, I agree that the library of this University shall make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for extensive copying for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor who supervised my thesis work or, in his absence, by the Chairperson of the department or the Dean of the School of Graduate Studies.
    [Show full text]