DOCSLIB.ORG

KPFHP Strategic Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
KPFHP Strategic Plan Kenai Peninsula Fish Habitat Partnership Strategic Plan Purpose The purpose of the Kenai Peninsula Fish Habitat Partnership is to create and foster effective collaborations to maintain healthy fish, healthy people, healthy habitat, and healthy economies in the Kenai Peninsula Borough. Mission To protect, maintain, restore and enhance fish habitat. Vision For future generations to have healthy, sustainable fish and aquatic ecosystems. A Participating Partner of the version 3.2 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ 4 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 5 Geography ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Climate ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Air Quality ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Cook Inlet Bathymetry ..................................................................................................................... 8 Tides and Circulation ....................................................................................................................... 9 Salinity and Sediment ...................................................................................................................... 9 Temperature and Ice Conditions ...................................................................................................... 9 Ground Water ................................................................................................................................ 10 Surface Water ................................................................................................................................ 11 Water Quality ................................................................................................................................ 12 Geology ......................................................................................................................................... 13 Soils and Vegetation ...................................................................................................................... 13 Spruce Bark Beetle Damage ........................................................................................................... 15 Aquatic Resources ......................................................................................................................... 15 Finfish - other than Salmon ............................................................................................................... 15 Salmon .............................................................................................................................................. 16 Shellfish ............................................................................................................................................. 17 Freshwater and Marine Invertebrates .............................................................................................. 18 Non-Aquatic Species ...................................................................................................................... 19 Birds .................................................................................................................................................. 19 Marine Mammals .............................................................................................................................. 20 Terrestrial Mammals ......................................................................................................................... 21 Focus Area Overview ............................................................................................................ 22 Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 22 Relative target effort levels of focal areas (Time and Funding) ....................................................... 23 Overarching Current Condition of Fish Habitat ............................................................................... 23 Overarching Desired Future Condition of Fish Habitat .................................................................... 24 Focal Area: Partnership Capacity .......................................................................................... 25 Current Condition .......................................................................................................................... 25 Desired Future Condition ............................................................................................................... 25 Member terms ............................................................................................................................... 25 Organizing Principles: .................................................................................................................... 25 Governing Structure ....................................................................................................................... 26 Objectives ...................................................................................................................................... 28 Priority Activities ........................................................................................................................... 29 FOCAL AREA: BIOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY ................................................................................ 31 Current Condition .......................................................................................................................... 31 Desired Future Condition ............................................................................................................... 31 Objectives ...................................................................................................................................... 32 2 FOCAL AREA – WATER QUALITY AND QUANTITY ................................................................... 33 Current Condition .......................................................................................................................... 33 Desired Future Condition ............................................................................................................... 33 Objectives ...................................................................................................................................... 33 FOCAL AREA – SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ........................................................................... 35 Current Condition .......................................................................................................................... 35 Desired Future Condition ............................................................................................................... 35 Objectives ...................................................................................................................................... 35 FOCAL AREA: EDUCATION ..................................................................................................... 37 Objectives ...................................................................................................................................... 37 FOCAL AREA: POLICY ............................................................................................................ 38 Current Condition .......................................................................................................................... 38 Desired Future Condition ............................................................................................................... 38 Objectives ...................................................................................................................................... 38 Appendices ........................................................................................................................... 40 Appendix A – Definitions ............................................................................................................... 40 Appendix B Significant Salmon Stocks ............................................................................................ 47 Appendix C Threats ........................................................................................................................ 59 Appendix D Prioritized Fish Passage Barriers for Interim ................................................................ 64 Appendix E Prioritized Restoration Needs ...................................................................................... 65 Appendix F Climate Change Summary ............................................................................................ 66 Appendix F Freshwater - Conservation Action Plan ....................................................................... 72 Appendix G Marine - Conservation Action Plan ............................................................................. 82 3 Executive Summary The Kenai Peninsula Fish Habitat Partnership formed to foster and create effective collaborations to maintain healthy fish, healthy people, healthy
Load more

Recommended publications
  • High-Resolution Numerical Modeling of Near-Surface Weather Conditions Over Alaska’S Cook Inlet and Shelikof Strait
    High-Resolution Numerical Modeling of Near-Surface Weather Conditions over Alaska’s Cook Inlet and Shelikof Strait Peter Q. Olsson Principal Investigator Co-principal Investigators: Haibo Liu Final Report OCS Study MMS 2007-043 October 2009 This study was funded in part by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service (MMS) through Cooperative Agreement No. M08AR12675, between MMS, Alaska Outer Continental Shelf Region, and the University of Alaska Fairbanks. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government. High-Resolution Numerical Modeling of Near-Surface Weather Conditions over Alaska’s Cook Inlet and Shelikof Strait Peter Q. Olsson Principal Investigator Co-principal Investigators: Haibo Liu Final Report OCS Study MMS 2007-043 October 2009 Contact information Coastal Marine Institute School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences University of Alaska Fairbanks P. O. Box 757220 Fairbanks, AK 99775-7220 email: [email protected] phone: 907.474.7208 fax: 907.474.7204 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables...................................................................................................................................ii List of Figures..................................................................................................................................ii Abstract...........................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Possible Impacts of Prudhoe Bay Shut Down on Alaska Refinery Output
    KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH Oil & Gas, Mining & Special Projects Office 144 N. Binkley Street Soldotna, Alaska 99669 BUSINESS: (907) 714-2335 FAX: (907) 262-8616 [email protected] www.cookinletoilandgas.org JOHN J. WILLIAMS BOROUGH MAYOR To: Mayor John J. Williams Thru: Tim Navarre, Chief of Staff Date: August 8, 2006 From: Bill Popp, Oil, Gas & Mining Liaison Subject: Possible impacts of Prudhoe Bay shut down on Alaska refinery output This preliminary analysis is a follow up on the “first take” my office provided on August 7th regarding the possible impacts of the Prudhoe Bay oil field closure. In particular, the effects on Alaska’s total refinery output of finished petroleum products and the ripple effects that may be felt in the communities of the Kenai Peninsula Borough. As pointed out in the “first take,” there could be significant impacts on in-state production of motor diesel, home heating fuels, power generation fuels, jet fuels and gasoline. These impacts could lead to price spikes and shortages for these fuels unless the refiners are able to secure either adequate alternative supplies of refined products from outside of Alaska, or alternative supply contracts for North Slope crude oil originating from fields other than Prudhoe Bay. 1. Existing refineries, total through puts and outputs and total Alaska consumption Alaska currently has 6 refineries. Two refineries are based on the North Slope and only serve that region. Two refineries are based in Fairbanks. One is based in Valdez and one is based in Nikiski. The four refineries based in Fairbanks, Valdez and Nikiski serve the major population centers of Alaska and will be the focus of this analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Nos Cook Inlet Operational Forecast System: Model Development and Hindcast Skill Assessment
    NOAA Technical Report NOS CS 40 NOS COOK INLET OPERATIONAL FORECAST SYSTEM: MODEL DEVELOPMENT AND HINDCAST SKILL ASSESSMENT Silver Spring, Maryland September 2020 noaa National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Ocean Service Coast Survey Development Laboratory Office of Coast Survey National Ocean Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. Department of Commerce The Office of Coast Survey (OCS) is the Nation’s only official chartmaker. As the oldest United States scientific organization, dating from 1807, this office has a long history. Today it promotes safe navigation by managing the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) nautical chart and oceanographic data collection and information programs. There are four components of OCS: The Coast Survey Development Laboratory develops new and efficient techniques to accomplish Coast Survey missions and to produce new and improved products and services for the maritime community and other coastal users. The Marine Chart Division acquires marine navigational data to construct and maintain nautical charts, Coast Pilots, and related marine products for the United States. The Hydrographic Surveys Division directs programs for ship and shore-based hydrographic survey units and conducts general hydrographic survey operations. The Navigational Services Division is the focal point for Coast Survey customer service activities, concentrating predominately on charting issues, fast-response hydrographic surveys, and Coast Pilot
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation Document Overview, Kenai Fjords National Park, Alaska
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Overview Kenai Fjords National Park Alaska Contact Information For more information about the Kenai Fjords National Park Foundation Document, contact: [email protected] or (907) 422-0500 or write to: Superintendent, Kenai Fjords National Park, P.O. Box 1727, Seward, AK 99664 Significance and Purpose Fundamental Resources and Values Significance statements express why Kenai Fjords National Park resources and values are important enough to merit national park unit designation. Statements of significance describe why an area is important within a global, national, regional, and systemwide context. These statements are linked to the purpose of the park unit, and are supported by data, research, and consensus. Significance statements describe the distinctive nature of the park and inform management decisions, focusing efforts on preserving and protecting the most important resources and values of the park unit. Fundamental resources and values are those features, systems, processes, experiences, stories, scenes, sounds, smells, or other attributes determined to merit primary consideration during planning and management processes because they are essential to achieving the purpose of the park and maintaining its significance. Icefields and Glaciers: Kenai Fjords National Park protects the Harding Icefield and its outflowing glaciers, where the maritime climate and mountainous topography result in the formation and persistence of glacier ice. The purpose of KENAI FJORDS NATIONAL PARK • Icefields is to preserve the scenic and environmental • Climate Processes integrity of an interconnected icefield, glacier, • Exit Glacier and coastal fjord ecosystem. • Science & Education Fjords: Kenai Fjords National Park protects wild and scenic fjords that open to the Gulf of Alaska where rich currents meet glacial outwash to sustain an abundance of marine life.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Prince William Sound and Kenai Peninsula Region, Alaska
    Geology of the Prince William Sound and Kenai Peninsula Region, Alaska Including the Kenai, Seldovia, Seward, Blying Sound, Cordova, and Middleton Island 1:250,000-scale quadrangles By Frederic H. Wilson and Chad P. Hults Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3110 View looking east down Harriman Fiord at Serpentine Glacier and Mount Gilbert. (photograph by M.L. Miller) 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Abstract ..........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................1 Geographic, Physiographic, and Geologic Framework ..........................................................................1 Description of Map Units .............................................................................................................................3 Unconsolidated deposits ....................................................................................................................3 Surficial deposits ........................................................................................................................3 Rock Units West of the Border Ranges Fault System ....................................................................5 Bedded rocks ...............................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • 200 Years of Terminus Retreat at Exit Glacier 1815-2015
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science 200 Years of Terminus Retreat at Exit Glacier 1815-2015 Natural Resource Report NPS/KEFJ/NRR—2016/1341 ON THE COVER Map of Exit Glacier terminus positions, 1815-2015. Dotted lines represent pre-1950 positions based on moraine dated (Cusick 2001). Dashed lines represent positions digitized from aerial photos. Solid lines represent positions mapped with a hand-held GPS unit. ON THIS PAGE Photograph of Exit Glacier, as it flows outwards from the Harding Icefield on September 6, 2016. Photograph courtesy of the National Park Service 200 Years of Terminus Retreat at Exit Glacier 1815-2015 Natural Resource Report NPS/KEFJ/NRR—2016/1341 Deborah Kurtz, Emily Baker National Park Service Kenai Fjords National Park P.O. Box 1727 Seward, Alaska 99664 November 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Susitna River FY 2014 Final Report
    Clean Boating on the Little Susitna River FY 2014 Final Report Prepared for: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Alaska Clean Water Action Grant #14-03 July 1, 2013—June 30, 2014 Cook Inletkeeper is a community-based nonprofit organization that combines advocacy, outreach, and science toward its mission to protect Alaska’s Cook Inlet watershed and the life it sustains. Report prepared by: Rachel Lord Outreach & Monitoring Coordinator Cook Inletkeeper 3734 Ben Walters Ln. Suite 201 Clean Boating on Big Lake Homer, AK 99603 (907) 235-4068 FY14 Final Report www. inletkeeper.org 2 Cook Inletkeeper ● www.inletkeeper.org TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 4 Launch Host Program 7 Boater Survey Results 9 Community Outreach 12 Future Work 15 Acknowledgements 16 Appendix A. FY14 Little Su Clean Boater Surveys Appendix B. Media Excerpts Appendix C. Clean boating resources Protecting Alaska’s Cook Inlet watershed and the life it sustains since 1995. 3 INTRODUCTION The Little Susitna River is located in the densely as impacts from high turbidity levels around the populated Southcentral region of Alaska. It sup- Public Use Facility (PUF, river mile 25). This pol- ports salmon and trout populations, making it a lutant loading is associated with busy, high use popular fishing destination for many in the An- times of the summer when Chinook salmon (May chorage and Mat-Su Borough area. In addition to -June) and Coho salmon (July –September) are fishing, people come to the ‘Little Su’ during running in the river. More information on the summer months for recreational boating, hunt- ADEC efforts at the Little Su can be found ing, picnics and camping.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Region New Employee Orientation Front Cover Shows Employees Working in Various Ways Around the Region
    Forest Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Alaska Region | September 2021 Alaska Region New Employee Orientation Front cover shows employees working in various ways around the region. Alaska Region New Employee Orientation R10-UN-017 September 2021 Juneau’s typically temperate, wet weather is influenced by the Japanese Current and results in about 300 days a year with rain or moisture. Average rainfall is 92 inches in the downtown area and 54 inches ten miles away at the airport. Summer temperatures range between 45 °F and 65 °F (7 °C and 18 °C), and in the winter between 25 °F and 35 °F (-4 °C and -2 °C). On average, the driest months of the year are April and May and the wettest is October, with the warmest being July and the coldest January and February. Table of Contents National Forest System Overview ............................................i Regional Office .................................................................. 26 Regional Forester’s Welcome ..................................................1 Regional Leadership Team ........................................... 26 Alaska Region Organization ....................................................2 Acquisitions Management ............................................ 26 Regional Leadership Team (RLT) ............................................3 Civil Rights ................................................................... 26 Common Place Names .............................................................4 Ecosystems Planning and Budget ................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2030 Comprehensive Plan Seward, Alaska
    2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE VOLUME II CITY OF SEWARD Adopted: May 30, 2017 prepared by: PDC Engineers 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SEWARD, ALASKA Prepared For: The City of Seward, Alaska Prepared By: PDC Engineers Anchorage, Alaska Adopted By the City Council of the City of Seward May 30, 2017 by Resolution 2017-028 Adopted By the Kenai Peninsula Borough Assembly August 15, 2017 by Ordinance 2017-18 Introduced by: Mayor, Carpenter Date: 07/1 8/1 7 Hearing: 08/15/ 17 Action: Enacted as Amended Vote: 9 Yes, 0 No, 0 Absent KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH ORDINANCE 2017-18 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING KPB 2.56.050 TO ADOPT VOLUMES I AND II OF THE SEWARD 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE AS THE OFFICIAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THAT PORTION OF THE BOROUGH WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF SEWARD WHEREAS, the Kenai Peninsula Borough provides for planning on an areawide basis in accordance with AS 29.40; and WHEREAS, m accordance with KPB 21.01.025(E), cities requesting extensive comprehensive plan amendments may recommend to the Kenai Peninsula Borough Planning Commission a change to the comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, with the completion of Volumes I and II of the Seward 2030 Comprehensive Plan, the City of Seward has prepared extensive comprehensive plan amendments for that area of the borough within the boundaries of the City of Seward; and WHEREAS, over the last two years the City of Seward Planning and Zoning Commission has held thirteen ( 13) public work sessions and meetings working on the updates; and WHEREAS, throughout the update process, members of
    [Show full text]
  • The Little Susitna River— an Ecological Assessment
    The Little Susitna River— An Ecological Assessment Jeffrey C. Davis and Gay A. Davis P.O. Box 923 Talkeetna, Alaska (907) 733.5432. www.arrialaska.org July 2007 Acknowledgements This project was completed with support from the State of Alaska, Alaska Clean Water Action Plan program, ACWA 07-11. Laura Eldred, the DEC Project Manger provided support through comments and suggestion on the project sampling plan, QAPP and final report. Nick Ettema from Grand Valley State University assisted in data collection. ARRI—Little Susitna River July 2007 Table of Contents Summary............................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction......................................................................................................................... 3 Methods............................................................................................................................... 4 Sampling Locations ........................................................................................................ 4 Results................................................................................................................................. 6 Riparian Development .................................................................................................... 6 Index of Bank Stability ................................................................................................... 7 Chemical Characteristics and Turbidity.........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Floods of October 1986 in Southcentral Alaska
    FLOODS OF OCTOBER 1986 IN SOUTHCENTRAL ALASKA " » U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OPEN- FILE REPORT 87-391 REVISED 1988 Prepared in cooperation with the: ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES ALASKA DIVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION FLOODS OF OCTOBER 1986 IN SOUTHCENTRAL ALASKA by Robert D. Lamke and Bruce P. Bigelow U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 87-391 REVISED 1988 Prepared in cooperation with the: ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES ALASKA DIVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION Anchorage, Alaska 1988 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section Water Resources Division Federal Center 4230 University Drive, Suite 201 Box 25425 Anchorage, Alaska 99508-4664 Denver, Colorado 80225 11 CONTENTS Page Abstract .............................................................. 1 Introduction .......................................................... 1 Purpose and scope ................................................ 1 Acknowledgements ................................................. 3 Precipitation ......................................................... 3 Discharge data ........................................................ 7 Peak stage and discharge table ................................... 7 Discharge data for October
    [Show full text]
  • This Is Now and That Was Then Stories That Weave Through the Eastern Kenai Peninsula
    THIS IS NOW AND THAT WAS THEN STORIES THAT WEAVE THROUGH THE EASTERN KENAI PENINSULA Seward Community Library: lma 1.1271 TEACHER’S GUIDE AND LESSONS VIDEO EPISODES CAN BE VIEWED AT kmtacorridor.org Every Place has a name… Every Name has a story. This booklet is the companion guide to the This Is Now And That Was Then film series. This series can be viewed at…. kmtacorridor.org This Is Now and That Was Then is a series of 12 short episodes highlighting the colorful history of the Kenai Mountains Turnagain Arm National Heritage Area of Alaska. Each episode focuses upon a landmark, presents how the feature got its name, and then transitions to a broader story about the history of the region. The historical and geological contexts range from the indigenous people who first lived on the Kenai to the 1964 Earthquake. This guide will help the educator integrate these episodes into their classroom. So come along with Rachael, Matt, and Brooke as they guide your students on a trip through the Eastern Kenai Peninsula and discover why this region was the first in Alaska to be designated a National Historic Area. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EPISODE DESCRIPTION Pg 4 1- Mount Alice 2- Resurrection Bay 3- Mount Marathon Pg 5 4- Exit Glacier 5- Victor Creek 6- Moose Pass Pg 6 7- Tern Lake 8- Kenai Lake 9- Canyon Creek Pg 7 10- Hope 11- Turnagain Arm 12- Portage LESSONS Pg 8 Find the Name Pg 9-11 Interpreting Maps Pgs 12-13 Building a Timeline Pgs 14-16 The Story Within a Photo Pgs 17-18 Photo (Re) Search PHOTO ACCURACY Pg 19 Accuracy of Photos in Episodes 3 This Is Now and That Was Then Programs can be viewed at: kmtacorridor.org PROGRAM DESCRIPTION MOUNT ALICE/MT EVA Duration: 10:04 1 Era: (1884-1903) Founding of Seward Name Origin: Alice and Eva were daughters of Resurrection Bay homesteaders Frank and Mary Lowell.
    [Show full text]