Understanding the Youth Development Model (Fact Sheet)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

MENTORING FACT SHEET U.S. Department of Education I Offi ce of Safe and Drug-Free Schools Mentoring Resource Center #13, January 2007 Understanding the Youth Development Model A theoretical connection has always existed between from adversity. Their ability to develop successfully mentoring and what’s commonly known as “youth depends to a great extent on the support and assis- development.” Mentoring is frequently referred to as tance they receive from the people and institutions a youth development strategy—one that uses posi- around them. tive youth-adult relationships to provide broad guid- ance and support rather than aiming to fi x a problem The “youth development” discussed here is an exten- or teach a specifi c skill. Mentoring programs often sion of that asset/resiliency process. In this context, include basic information about adolescent develop- youth development is a discipline in the fi eld of youth ment during mentor training, encouraging mentors to work, founded on the belief that young people are be “developmental” rather than “prescriptive” in their best able to move through their developmental stages work with young people. But what exactly does it when they are supported across all sectors of the mean to use a developmental approach when serving community—by individuals, family, schools, youth young people? What specifi c skills do mentors and agencies, faith organizations, community governance, staff need? And what programmatic goals, activities, business, and more. The youth development model and environments are needed to fully implement a focuses on activities that nurture developmental as- positive youth development model? sets rather than on reducing particular risks or pre- venting specifi c problems. Its ultimate goal is to help Because youth development is the cornerstone of ef- youth become successful adults—not just problem- fective mentoring, the three fact sheets in this series free, but fully prepared to be responsible, contributing, will provide a basic overview of youth development and healthy adults. theory and practice and describe ways in which these practices can be more fully incorporated into mentor- ing programs. It is hoped that this information will help Background: Resiliency research as the Offi ce of Safe and Drug-Free Schools (OSDFS) grant- foundation for youth development ees enrich the mentoring experience for mentors and mentees and ultimately improve outcomes for youth. Researchers over the last 25 years have delved into the question of resiliency, examining why and how some children and youth from challenging environ- What is youth development? ments and circumstances can survive and even thrive while others do not. A number of landmark longitudinal Youth development in its broadest sense refers to studies on child development, such as a classic study the stages that all children go through to acquire the on the development of poor children and families on attitudes, competencies, values, and social skills they Kauai, Hawaii, identifi ed internal and external factors need to become successful adults. As children move that helped children overcome risks inherent in their through their developmental stages (see Erikson’s lives (Werner and Smith, 1992). What the studies Stages of Development on page 2), they acquire a set found was that at least 50 percent—and often closer of personal assets, or supports, that help them face to 70 percent—of youth growing up in high-risk condi- the challenges and opportunities ahead. These assets tions developed social competence despite exposure allow youth to become resilient—able to bounce back to severe stress, and overcame the odds to lead suc- MENTORING FACT SHEET cessful lives. They also identifi ed specifi c protective Institute’s research involving over 100,000 children in factors, such as strong cognitive and social skills, grades 6 through 12. high self-esteem, connection to family and community, and coping skills, which were believed to be Over the years, youth workers have used this re- instrumental in helping these children develop suc- search into resiliency and assets to develop a com- cessfully (Benard, 1991). prehensive set of strategies designed to help young people achieve their developmental goals. It rejects These research studies and their fi ndings, along with problem-centered interventions and also goes beyond considerable studies of best practices and lessons prevention-focused models that are generally based learned in the prevention fi eld, have helped theoreti- on preventing specifi c behaviors or risks, such as teen cians and practitioners defi ne a set of “developmental pregnancy or delinquency. Youth development practi- assets” that are considered to be the building blocks tioners help youth successfully navigate the develop- of successful youth development. Probably the best- mental stages they must all go through, allowing them known work on these assets is the Search Institute’s to develop a rich set of assets that will help them cope framework of 40 Developmental Assets, an exten- with risk, overcome personal and external challenges, sive list of personal and social assets based on the and become well-adjusted adults. This approach can require a signifi cant shift in thinking for youth workers Erikson’s Stages of Development and programs used to dealing with problem solving, risk reduction, delinquency prevention, and other Psychologist Eric Erikson (1902–1994) is perhaps the forms of behavior-focused interventions. best known theorist in the fi eld of human development. He proposed a model of eight stages of development that all children go through as they move from infant to adult, and built on that theoretical framework to identify The basics of the youth development critical assets that must be mastered in order for the approach: The Five Cs and SOS child to reach successful adulthood. The stages are: A variety of models has been developed to help Trust, which he linked to positive emotional practitioners implement youth development in their relationships with caring adults organizations, most of which have similar principles, A strong sense of self-suffi ciency goals, and strategies. Because youth development has the rather broad goal of helping youth make the Ability to exercise initiative transition to healthy adulthood, there is quite a range Confi dence in one’s ability to master skills and of what “success” looks like. Most youth workers and navigate one’s world educators consider economic independence, intellec- tual and social competence, personal satisfaction, and A well-formed sense of personal identity physical and psychological well-being to be signifi cant A desire to be productive and contributing for measures. There is widespread agreement on fi ve key future generations outcomes for youth that are vital for their transition to adulthood. These are known as the “Five Cs”: The ability to experience true intimacy 1. Competence: Positive view of one’s actions A strong sense of personal integrity in specifi c areas, including social, academic, The work of Erikson and other human development cognitive, and vocational. theorists has provided important foundations to the positive youth development approach to working with 2. Confi dence: The internal sense of overall young people. positive self-worth and self-effi cacy; positive identity; and belief in the future. Child Development Institute: http://www childdevelopmentinfo.com/development/ erickson.shtml Page 2 MENTORING FACT SHEET 3. Connection: Positive bonds with people and Supports are the ongoing positive relationships that institutions—peers, family, school, and young people have with adults, peers, and organiza- community—in which both parties contribute tions that provide the safety, structure, motivation, to the relationship. nurturing, and guidance to allow youth to explore, test, learn, grow, and contribute. Supports catch 4. Character: Respect for societal and cultural youth when they trip up and offer encouragement rules, possession of standards for correct for them to try again. Supportive adults have the behaviors, a sense of right and wrong challenging role of stepping up when needed and (morality), spirituality, integrity. stepping back as often as possible to allow youth to explore on their own. This support allows youth to 5. Caring or Compassion: A sense of sympathy fully take advantage of their opportunities—doing one and empathy for others. without the other is ineffective. (Lerner, Fisher, and Weinberg, 2000) These fi ve developmental outcomes can only be SOS in action achieved with signifi cant support from the entire Youth development programs build their services and community—family, friends, schools, and other com- activities around the SOS structure, ideally using a munity institutions. Yet, this support is often miss- broad range of community partnerships to implement ing from the lives of many young people, especially this multi-faceted model and create the rich environ- those whose environments are unhealthy, unsafe, or ment that youth need to be successful. Organizations lacking opportunities. Organizations using a youth implement the youth development approach by: development approach therefore provide services, opportunities, and supports (SOS) that enhance the Providing services for youth that young person’s environment and increase his or her ability to reach these outcomes. I Ensure that basic needs—physical and psycho- logical health, food and shelter, safety, and other Services are the critical interventions needed
Recommended publications
  • Homeschooling and the Question of Socialization Revisited

    Homeschooling and the Question of Socialization Revisited

    Homeschooling and the Question of Socialization Revisited Richard G. Medlin Stetson University This article reviews recent research on homeschooled children’s socialization. The research indicates that homeschooling parents expect their children to respect and get along with people of diverse backgrounds, provide their children with a variety of social opportunities outside the family, and believe their children’s social skills are at least as good as those of other children. What homeschooled children think about their own social skills is less clear. Compared to children attending conventional schools, however, research suggest that they have higher quality friendships and better relationships with their parents and other adults. They are happy, optimistic, and satisfied with their lives. Their moral reasoning is at least as advanced as that of other children, and they may be more likely to act unselfishly. As adolescents, they have a strong sense of social responsibility and exhibit less emotional turmoil and problem behaviors than their peers. Those who go on to college are socially involved and open to new experiences. Adults who were homeschooled as children are civically engaged and functioning competently in every way measured so far. An alarmist view of homeschooling, therefore, is not supported by empirical research. It is suggested that future studies focus not on outcomes of socialization but on the process itself. Homeschooling, once considered a fringe movement, is now widely seen as “an acceptable alternative to conventional schooling” (Stevens, 2003, p. 90). This “normalization of homeschooling” (Stevens, 2003, p. 90) has prompted scholars to announce: “Homeschooling goes mainstream” (Gaither, 2009, p. 11) and “Homeschooling comes of age” (Lines, 2000, p.
  • Child Labor Rules for Employing Youth in Restaurants and Quick-Service Establishments Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)

    Child Labor Rules for Employing Youth in Restaurants and Quick-Service Establishments Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)

    U.S. Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division (July 2010) Fact Sheet #2A: Child Labor Rules for Employing Youth in Restaurants and Quick-Service Establishments Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) This fact sheet provides general information concerning the application of the federal child labor provisions to restaurants and quick-service establishments that employ workers who are less than 18 years of age. For detailed information about the federal youth provisions, please read Regulations, 29 CFR Part 570. The Department of Labor is committed to helping young workers find positive, appropriate, and safe employment experiences. The child labor provisions of the FLSA were enacted to ensure that when young people work, the work does not jeopardize their health, well-being, or educational opportunities. Working youth are generally entitled to the same minimum wage and overtime protections as older adults. For information about the minimum wage and overtime e requirements in the restaurant and quick-service industries, please see Fact Sheet # 2 in this series, Restaurants and Quick Service Establishment under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Minimum Age Standards for Employment The FLSA and the child labor regulations, issued at 29 CFR Part 570, establish both hours and occupational standards for youth. Youth of any age are generally permitted to work for businesses entirely owned by their parents, except those under 16 may not be employed in mining or manufacturing and no one under 18 may be employed in any occupation the Secretary of Labor has declared to be hazardous. 18 Years Once a youth reaches 18 years of age, he or she is no longer subject to the federal of Age child labor provisions.
  • Youth Participation in Electoral Processes Handbook for Electoral Management Bodies

    Youth Participation in Electoral Processes Handbook for Electoral Management Bodies

    Youth Participation in Electoral Processes Handbook for Electoral Management Bodies FIRST EDITION: March 2017 With support of: European Commission United Nations Development Programme Global Project Joint Task Force on Electoral Assistance for Electoral Cycle Support II ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Lead authors Ruth Beeckmans Manuela Matzinger Co-autors/editors Gianpiero Catozzi Blandine Cupidon Dan Malinovich Comments and feedback Mais Al-Atiat Julie Ballington Maurizio Cacucci Hanna Cody Kundan Das Shrestha Andrés Del Castillo Aleida Ferreyra Simon Alexis Finley Beniam Gebrezghi Najia Hashemee Regev Ben Jacob Fernanda Lopes Abreu Niall McCann Rose Lynn Mutayiza Chris Murgatroyd Noëlla Richard Hugo Salamanca Kacic Jana Schuhmann Dieudonne Tshiyoyo Rana Taher Njoya Tikum Sébastien Vauzelle Mohammed Yahya Lea ZoriĆ Copyeditor Jeff Hoover Graphic desiger Adelaida Contreras Solis Disclaimer This publication is made possible thanks to the support of the UNDP Nepal Electoral Support Project (ESP), generously funded by the European Union, Norway, the United Kingdom and Denmark. The information and views set out in this publication are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the UN or any of the donors. The recommendations expressed do not necessarily represent an official UN policy on electoral or other matters as outlined in the UN Policy Directives or any other documents. Decision to adopt any recommendations and/or suggestions presented in this publication are a sovereign matter for individual states. Youth
  • Youth Voter Participation

    Youth Voter Participation

    Youth Voter Participation Youth Voter Participation Involving Today’s Young in Tomorrow’s Democracy Copyright © International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA) 1999 All rights reserved. Applications for permission to reproduce all or any part of this publication should be made to: Publications Officer, International IDEA, S-103 34 Stockholm, Sweden. International IDEA encourages dissemination of its work and will respond promptly to requests for permission for reproduction or translation. This is an International IDEA publication. International IDEA’s publications are not a reflection of specific national or political interests. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of International IDEA’s Board or Council members. Art Direction and Design: Eduard âehovin, Slovenia Illustration: Ana Ko‰ir Pre-press: Studio Signum, Slovenia Printed and bound by: Bröderna Carlssons Boktryckeri AB, Varberg ISBN: 91-89098-31-5 Table of Contents FOREWORD 7 OVERVIEW 9 Structure of the Report 9 Definition of “Youth” 9 Acknowledgements 10 Part I WHY YOUNG PEOPLE SHOULD VOTE 11 A. Electoral Abstention as a Problem of Democracy 13 B. Why Participation of Young People is Important 13 Part II ASSESSING AND ANALYSING YOUTH TURNOUT 15 A. Measuring Turnout 17 1. Official Registers 17 2. Surveys 18 B. Youth Turnout in National Parliamentary Elections 21 1. Data Sources 21 2. The Relationship Between Age and Turnout 24 3. Cross-National Differences in Youth Turnout 27 4. Comparing First-Time and More Experienced Young Voters 28 5. Factors that May Increase Turnout 30 C. Reasons for Low Turnout and Non-Voting 31 1. Macro-Level Factors 31 2.
  • Reconsidering the Minimum Voting Age in the United States

    Reconsidering the Minimum Voting Age in the United States

    Reconsidering the Minimum Voting Age in the United States Benjamin Oosterhoff1, Laura Wray-Lake2, & Daneil Hart3 1 Montana State University 2 University of California, Los Angeles 3 Rutgers University Several US states have proposed bills to lower the minimum local and national voting age to 16 years. Legislators and the public often reference political philosophy, attitudes about the capabilities of teenagers, or past precedent as evidence to support or oppose changing the voting age. Dissenters to changing the voting age are primarily concerned with whether 16 and 17-year-olds have sufficient political maturity to vote, including adequate political knowledge, cognitive capacity, independence, interest, and life experience. We review past research that suggests 16 and 17-year-olds possess the political maturity to vote. Concerns about youths’ ability to vote are generally not supported by developmental science, suggesting that negative stereotypes about teenagers may be a large barrier to changing the voting age. Keywords: voting, adolescence, rights and responsibility, politics Voting represents both a right and responsibility within tory and rooted in prejudiced views of particular groups’ ca- democratic political systems. At its simplest level, voting is pabilities. Non-white citizens were not granted the right to an expression of a preference (Achen & Bartels, 2017) in- vote until the 1870s, and after being legally enfranchised, tended to advance the interests of oneself or others. Voting literacy tests were designed to prevent people of color from is also a way that one of the core qualities of citizenship— voting (Anderson, 2018). The year 2020 marks the 100th participation in the rule-making of a society—is exercised.
  • Adjusting the Bright-Line Age of Accountability Within the Criminal

    Adjusting the Bright-Line Age of Accountability Within the Criminal

    Duquesne Law Review Volume 55 Number 1 Drafting Statutes and Rules: Article 8 Pedagogy, Practice, and Politics 2017 Adjusting the Bright-Line Age of Accountability within the Criminal Justice System: Raising the Age of Majority to Age 21 Based on the Conclusions of Scientific Studies egarr ding Neurological Development and Culpability of Young-Adult Offenders Carly Loomis-Gustafson Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr Part of the Juvenile Law Commons Recommended Citation Carly Loomis-Gustafson, Adjusting the Bright-Line Age of Accountability within the Criminal Justice System: Raising the Age of Majority to Age 21 Based on the Conclusions of Scientific Studies egarr ding Neurological Development and Culpability of Young-Adult Offenders, 55 Duq. L. Rev. 221 (2017). Available at: https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr/vol55/iss1/8 This Student Article is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Duquesne Law Review by an authorized editor of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. Adjusting the Bright-Line Age of Accountability within the Criminal Justice System: Raising the Age of Majority to Age 21 based on the Conclusions of Scientific Studies Regarding Neurological Development and Culpability of Young-Adult Offenders Carly Loom is-Gustafson* ABSTRACT The criminaljustice system determines a criminalactor's liability based primarily on the age of the actor at the time of the offense, adhering to a rule instituted by arbitrary designationof adulthood at the age of eighteen. Solely, this line determines the degree of treat- ment a criminal defendant will receive within the system, with more punitive measures being reserved for adult offenders and greater re- habilitative efforts made for juvenile offenders.
  • Child Marriage and POVERTY

    Child Marriage and POVERTY

    Child Marriage and POVERTY Child marriage is most common in the world’s poorest countries and is often concentrated among the poorest households within those countries. It is closely linked with poverty and low levels of economic development. In families with limited resources, child marriage is often seen as a way to provide for their daughter’s future. But girls who marry young are IFAD / Anwar Hossein more likely to be poor and remain poor. CHILD MARRIAGE Is INTIMATELY shows that household economic status is a key factor in CONNEctED to PovERTY determining the timing of marriage for girls (along with edu- cation and urban-rural residence, with rural girls more likely Child marriage is highly prevalent in sub- to marry young). In fact, girls living in poor households are Saharan Africa and parts of South Asia, the approximately twice as likely to marry before 18 than girls two most impoverished regions of the world.1 living in better-off households.4 • More than half of the girls in Bangladesh, Mali, Mozam- In Côte d’Ivoire, a target country for the President’s Emer- bique and Niger are married before age 18. In these same gency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), girls in the poorest countries, more than 75 percent of people live on less than $2 a day. In Child Marriage in the Poorest and Richest Households Mali, 91 percent of the in Select Countries population lives on less 80 than $2 a day. 2 70 • Countries with low GDPs tend to have a higher 60 prevalence of child mar- riage.
  • Youth Governance: Strengthening and Maintaining Youth Committees to Improve Services for Youth

    Youth Governance: Strengthening and Maintaining Youth Committees to Improve Services for Youth

    Youth Governance: Strengthening and Maintaining Youth Committees to Improve Services for Youth STATE PLAN LOCAL PLAN POLICIES & GUIDANCE BUDGET CHOICES CLASP's Opportunities for Action is a series of short memos with recommendations for state and local areas to fully realize the options in the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) to help low-income and lower-skilled youth and adults achieve economic success. WIOA title I youth requires that at least 75 percent of available state-wide funds and 75 percent of funds available to local areas be spent on workforce investment services for out-of-school youth. This is an increase from 30 percent under the Workforce Investment Act (WIA). In addition, WIOA raises the eligibility range for out-of-school youth from 16-21 to 16-24. This redirected funding gives states and local communities dedicated resources to implement effective employment, education, and youth development strategies for the most vulnerable young people in highly distressed communities. Similarly, raising the eligibility age could help states and local areas better target their programming for this population of youth who are transitioning into adulthood. There is no one system that serves out-of-school youth, and out-of-school youth are more likely to touch multiple systems. Consequently, specific developmental needs often go unmet, especially among youth served through the adult workforce system. Unlike WIA, WIOA does not require local workforce boards to maintain youth councils. However, WIOA does allow local boards to establish standing youth committees, as well as continue any existing youth councils established under the previous law.
  • Prepare Your Child for Age of Majority and Transfer of Rights*

    Prepare Your Child for Age of Majority and Transfer of Rights*

    INSPIRING POSSIBILITIES Prepare Your Child for Age of Majority and Transfer of Rights* Parents want their children to have the skills they need to a statement that the student has been informed of his or succeed as adults. While this is important for every young her rights and responsibilities under IDEA. person, youth with disabilities often face extra challenges. • The public agency (the school) will provide required That’s why they need to be actively involved in setting notices to both the student and the parents. This their high school goals and planning for their transition to regulation does not apply to students who have been adulthood well before they reach the age of majority. Age of determined to be “incompetent” under state law. majority is the legal age established under state law at which Rights that Transfer an individual is no longer a minor and, as a young adult, has the right and responsibility to make certain legal choices In states that transfer educational rights at the age of majority, that adults make. This is called transfer of rights. In most all of the educational rights provided to the parents transfer states, the age of majority is 18, but there are exceptions. It is to the student when he or she reaches the age of majority. important to know your state’s laws. These educational rights may include the rights to: Takeaways from this handout: • receive notice of and attend Individualized Education Program (IEP) meetings • Most young adults, usually at age 18, are granted certain • consent to reevaluation legal rights including special education rights.
  • Unit on ADULTISM

    Unit on ADULTISM

    http://www.socialjusticeeducation.org Tools for Building Justice, January, 2003 Unit On ADULTISM Unit Outline Session # 1. Introduction Introducing the concept of unequal treatment for youth and adults, the session explores stereotypes and putdowns of young people and analyzes two scenes of youth/adult interaction. 2. Adultism This session focuses on adultism and internalized adultism: how young people are mistreated or discriminated against in adult-defined institutions and how young people can internalize mistreatment against themselves and other youth. Session closes with strengths of young people. 3. Adults This session examines the conditioning process of becoming an adult, identifying the costs and privileges of adulthood and the requirements for being an adult ally to youth. 4. Organizing/Action Unit on Adultism 1 SESSION 1. Introduction Aims • To introduce the unit on adultism • To identify and discuss two day-to-day conflicts between youth and adults Skills Students will: • Identify negative stereotypes applied to young people as a group • Identify target and nontarget group members in two conflicts affecting youth and adults • Apply the concept of unequal treatment of youth and adults to other youth/adult relationships besides those depicted Preparation Consult with appropriate school counseling personnel ahead of time about the unit, lining up adults for young people to talk to. Make sure you have reviewed local guidelines for mandated reporting of child abuse, and prepare a simple, clear statement to make to students. You will need photos and 2 pieces of butcher paper and markers for the adult/youth brainstorm. Note that there is one photo with uncaptioned and captioned versions: prepare the discussion accordingly.
  • Research Facts on Homeschooling

    Research Facts on Homeschooling

    RESEARCH FACTS ON HOMESCHOOLING Brian D. Ray, Ph.D. January 6, 2015 General Facts and Trends • Homeschooling – that is, parent-led home-based education – is an age-old traditional educational practice that a decade ago appeared to be cutting-edge and “alternative” but is now bordering on “mainstream” in the United States. It may be the fastest-growing form of education in the United States. Home-based education has also been growing around the world in many other nations (e.g., Australia, Canada, France, Hungary, Japan, Kenya, Russia, Mexico, South Korea, Thailand, and the United Kingdom). • There are about 2.2 million home-educated students in the United States. There were an estimated 1.73 to 2.35 million children (in grades K to 12) home educated during the spring of 2010 in the United States (Ray, 2011). It appears the homeschool population is continuing to grow (at an estimated 2% to 8% per annum over the past few years). • Families engaged in home-based education are not dependent on public, tax-funded resources for their children’s education. The finances associated with their homeschooling likely represent over $24 billion that American taxpayers do not have to spend, annually, since these children are not in public schools • Homeschooling is quickly growing in popularity among minorities. About 15% of homeschool families are non-white/nonHispanic (i.e., not white/Anglo). • A demographically wide variety of people homeschool – these are atheists, Christians, and Mormons; conservatives, libertarians, and liberals; low-, middle-, and high-income families; black, Hispanic, and white; parents with Ph.D.s, GEDs, and no high-school diplomas.
  • Homeschool Education Guide a Supplement to the Educator Guide Federal Junior Duck Stamp Program Connecting Youth with Nature Through Science and Art!

    Homeschool Education Guide a Supplement to the Educator Guide Federal Junior Duck Stamp Program Connecting Youth with Nature Through Science and Art!

    Homeschool Education Guide A Supplement to the Educator Guide Federal Junior Duck Stamp Program Connecting Youth with Nature Through Science and Art! An opportunity to investigate what is fun, unique, and mysterious about waterfowl and wetlands in North America and in your community. The mission of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is working with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. Contents Getting Started .................................................................................................................7 What is the Junior Duck Stamp Program? ....................................................................7 Curriculum Guides and the Junior Duck Stamp Art Contest .........................................8 Junior Duck Stamp Youth Guide .............................................................................8 Junior Duck Stamp Educator Guide ........................................................................8 Junior Duck Stamp Art Contest ...............................................................................8 How is the Homeschool Guide Organized .......................................................................9 Using the Homeschool Guide ........................................................................................ 10 Learning and the Junior Duck Stamp Homeschool Guide ......................................... 10 Why Waterfowl and Wetlands for Homeschoolers? ...................................................