DOCSLIB.ORG

Higham 2011 Fish Physiology.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Higham 2011 Fish Physiology.Pdf Provided for non-commercial research and educational use. Not for reproduction, distribution or commercial use. This article was originally published in Encyclopedia of Fish Physiology: From Genome to Environment, published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author’s benefit and for the benefit of the author’s institution, for non-commercial research and educational use including without limitation use in instruction at your institution, sending it to specific colleagues who you know, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier’s permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial Higham T.E. (2011) Feeding Mechanics. In: Farrell A.P., (ed.), Encyclopedia of Fish Physiology: From Genome to Environment, volume 1, pp. 597–602. San Diego: Academic Press. ª 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Author's personal copy Feeding Mechanics TE Higham, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA ª 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. How Do Fishes Capture Prey? Ecomorphology of Feeding Feeding in Jawless Fishes Jaw Protrusion The Evolution of Suction Feeding The Integration of Locomotion and Feeding What Is Suction-Feeding Performance? Future Directions Hydrodynamics of Suction Feeding Further Reading Glossary movement. The movements of the particles during Buccal cavity The mouth (oral) cavity at the anterior feeding are captured using high-speed video. end of the fish in front of the gills. Ecomorphology The relationship between morphology Digital particle image velocimetry (DPIV) A modern and ecology. computational technique used to visualize the Exaptation A character, previously shaped by natural movement of fluids. Neutrally buoyant reflective selection for a particular function, that later is co-opted particles are placed in the water, illuminated using a for a new use. laser light sheet and are used to measure water Ram The forward movement of the fish. How Do Fishes Capture Prey? The prevalence of suction feeding is the major focus of this article. The mechanisms underlying suction feeding Suction (mouth expansion), ram (forward swimming), in fishes are fairly complex. For example, the initial and manipulation are three mechanisms of prey expansive phase is a result of hyoid depression, cranial capture in fishes. Despite the considerable diversity rotation, jaw protrusion, and jaw opening. The muscula­ among the approximately 28 000 species of fishes, ture involved in feeding is discussed in other articles (see the most common mode of prey capture involves also The Muscles: Cartilaginous Fishes Cranial Muscles suction feeding. Although the general principles and Bony Fish Cranial Muscles). underlying suction feeding are relatively straightfor­ ward, several aspects of the feeding system can be modulated in order to alter feeding performance. For Ram example, the rate and magnitude of mouth expansion, the distance between the fish’s mouth and prey item, Several species of fishes capture prey without generating and body movements will influence suction-feeding suction or manipulating the prey. Ram feeding occurs performance. Jaw protrusion is an additional feature when a fish swims over a prey item with its mouth open. that can enhance suction-feeding performance. Based Examples of fishes that employ ram include tunas and on recent evidence, intraoral processing (chewing) also whale sharks. appears to be a relatively common feature among fishes. For example, bowfin (Amia calva), salmonids (e.g., Salmo salar), and pike (e.g., Esox niger)all chew Suction prey with their oral jaws. Modern experimental techniques, including sonomicrometry, digital particle As indicated above, suction feeding is the most common image velocimetry (DPIV), in vivo pressure recordings, mode of prey capture. It involves the rapid expansion of and computational fluid dynamics, all have propelled the buccal cavity, which ultimately draws water into the our understanding of the biomechanics of feeding in mouth due to a pressure gradient formed (Figure 1). The fishes. Some websites include videos that show exam­ majority of bony fishes (Osteichthyes) employs suction ples of these features of fish feeding (see the Relevant feeding in order to capture prey (see Video Clip 1 for an Websites section). example of a fish employing suction feeding). 597 Encyclopedia of Fish Physiology: From Genome to Environment, 2011, Vol. 1, 597-602, DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-1237-4553-8.00216-1 Author's personal copy 598 Buoyancy, Locomotion, and Movement in Fishes | Feeding Mechanics The Evolution of Suction Feeding The invasion of new habitats by early fishes was likely facilitated by the evolution of jaws. The diversity of gnathostomes (jawed fishes) exploded in the Silurian and gnathostomes is currently represented by the chondricth­ yans and bony fishes. Later advances, such as jaw protrusion (discussed later) and pharyngeal jaws, then enhanced the basic feeding plan. However, it is important to discuss first the origin of jaws and ultimately suction feeding. Jaws evolved in fishes over 460 million years ago. Recently, two hypotheses have been put forth explaining Figure 1 Suction feeding in the silverspotted sculpin, Blepsias the origin of jaws. Several commonalities persist in both cirrhosus. These images highlight the extent to which the jaw is hypotheses. For example, both agree that jaws represent protruded during suction feeding and the fact that ram the first branchial arch, also termed the mandibular arch (swimming) is not necessary for capturing prey with suction feeding. (Figure 2). The evidence supporting this includes the fact that most of the elements of the jaws (skeletal elements, muscles, etc.) resemble those of other branchial arches. Also, both agree that the lower jaw resides in the ancestral position of the mandibular arch, whereas the upper jaw Manipulation (a) In addition to suction and ram, fishes can obtain prey by physically contacting it and bringing it into the mouth, that is, biting. For example, biting is relatively common among shark and teleost fishes. Every species of hetero­ dontid sharks is ecologically and functionally specialized for durophagy, which involves the consumption of hard prey such as mollusks or crabs. In many cases, the oral jaws of fishes are used to bite a prey item that is located on the substratum. Furthermore, some fishes will bite other animals (e.g., specialized for eating scales) and (b) some will bite off small pieces of plants. As explained below, jawless fishes also use manipulation in order to obtain food. Feeding in Jawless Fishes Hagfishes and lampreys feed in a complex and very (c) different way compared with other fishes (see also Hagfishes and Lamprey: Hagfishes, Lampreys: Energetics and Development, and Lampreys: Environmental Physiology). The feeding system includes posteriorly directed keratinous teeth that are attached to dental plates, a paired series of cartilages. The dental plates are moved in and out of the mouth during feeding via retractor and protractor muscles. The movement of the dental plate acts in a similar way to a Figure 2 A hypothetical schematic the evolution of jaws for fixed pulley. This system appears to have both advan­ suction feeding. (a) Here the mandibular (blue) and hyoid (green) tagesanddisadvantagesrelativetofisheswith jaws.The arches before being involved in the jaws. (b) Here the mandibular pulley system allows maximal force transmission, but arch has become the jaws, which are suitable for respiration. In this amphistylic jaw suspension, the mandibular arch is directly does not permit speed amplification. Speed amplifica­ connected tot the cranium. (c) Here the mandibular arch is not tion is likely a key aspect of jaws that has facilitated the directly connected with the cranium, which is more suitable for success of jawed fishes. feeding. Author's personal copy Buoyancy, Locomotion, and Movement in Fishes | Feeding Mechanics 599 stems from the forward extension (in front of the mouth 100 opening) of the maxillary part of the mandibular arch (see also The Skeleton: Bony Fish Skeleton). The first hypothesis for the origins of jaws is the neo­ classical hypothesis, which asserts that the jaw first evolved for stronger ventilation and then to grasp prey. As ventila­ tion increases, prey would be sucked in and potentially consumed. Thus, what originally began with a ventilatory function eventually became utilized for suction feeding, 20 indicating that the current use in feeding is an exaptation. Relative peak fluid speed (%) 0 Eventually, the ability to grasp prey was improved when 0 0.5 1.0 dentition became associated with the mandibular arches. In Distance from mouth aperture the neoclassical hypothesis, few or no oral structures were (maximum mouth diameters) lost during the jawless-to-jawed transition. Figure 3 The general relationship between fluid speed and The second hypothesis for the evolution of the jaws is relative distance from the mouth opening (aperture). Fluid speed the heterotopic hypothesis, which is based mainly on mod­ drops off exponentially going away from the mouth aperture, ern developmental studies. This hypothesis asserts that the highlighting the importance of being close to the prey
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Building Trophic Specializations That Result in Substantial Niche
    Journal of Anatomy J. Anat. (2017) doi: 10.1111/joa.12742 Building trophic specializations that result in substantial niche partitioning within a young adaptive radiation Luz Patricia Hernandez,1 Dominique Adriaens,2 Christopher H. Martin,3 Peter C. Wainwright,4 Bert Masschaele5 and Manuel Dierick5 1Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA 2Evolutionary Morphology of Vertebrates, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium 3Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA 4Department of Evolution & Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA 5Department of Subatomic and Radiation Physics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium Abstract Dietary partitioning often accompanies the increased morphological diversity seen during adaptive radiations within aquatic systems. While such niche partitioning would be expected in older radiations, it is unclear how significant morphological divergence occurs within a shorter time period. Here we show how differential growth in key elements of the feeding mechanism can bring about pronounced functional differences among closely related species. An incredibly young adaptive radiation of three Cyprinodon species residing within hypersaline lakes in San Salvador Island, Bahamas, has recently been described. Characterized by distinct head shapes, gut content analyses revealed three discrete feeding modes in these species: basal detritivory as well as derived durophagy and lepidophagy (scale-feeding). We dissected, cleared and stained, and micro-CT scanned species to assess functionally relevant differences in craniofacial musculoskeletal elements. The widespread feeding mode previously described for cyprinodontiforms, in which the force of the bite may be secondary to the requisite dexterity needed to pick at food items, is modified within both the scale specialist and the durophagous species.
    [Show full text]
  • Reptiles As Principal Prey? Adaptations for Durophagy and Prey Selection by Jaguar (Panthera Onca) Everton B.P
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL HISTORY, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2016.1180717 Reptiles as principal prey? Adaptations for durophagy and prey selection by jaguar (Panthera onca) Everton B.P. Mirandaa,b, Jorge F.S. de Menezesc,d and Marcelo L. Rheingantzc aLaboratório de Herpetologia, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, Brazil; bPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, Brasil; cLaboratório de Ecologia e Conservação de Populações, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil; dMitrani Department of Desert Ecology, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY We examined the evidence supporting the hypothesis that jaguars Received 16 February 2015 (Panthera onca) have morphological and behavioural adaptations Accepted 21 January 2016 ’ to facilitate reptile predation. Jaguars head and bite features show KEYWORDS adaptations to durophagy (consumption of hard-integumented Dangerous prey; prey) that are very unusual within the genus Panthera. These saurophagy; Tayassuidae; include: thick canines, well-developed head muscles and a fatal Xenarthra bite directed to braincase or nape. These characteristics have been previously considered an adaptation for the consumption of rep- tilian prey, whose thick integument poses a challenge to preda- tion. Although causation of any trait as result of natural selection is hard to demonstrate with ecological evidence, its consequences can be suggested and predictions made. Here, through a review of the literature on jaguar predatory habits, we tallied the evidence for saurophagy against environmental characteristics correlated with jaguar predation on reptiles. We offer a new explanation for the presence of those traits, based on the selection patterns, prey abundances and main predation habits over the geographic range of the jaguar.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontogeny of Jaw Mechanics and Stiffness in Mollusk‐Feeding
    Received: 18 December 2018 Revised: 15 March 2019 Accepted: 16 March 2019 DOI: 10.1002/jmor.20984 RESEARCH ARTICLE Killing them softly: Ontogeny of jaw mechanics and stiffness in mollusk-feeding freshwater stingrays Kelsi M. Rutledge1,2 | Adam P. Summers1 | Matthew A. Kolmann3,4,1 1Department of Biology, Friday Harbor Laboratories, University of Washington, Friday Abstract Harbor, Washington Durophagous predators consume hard-shelled prey such as bivalves, gastropods, and 2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary large crustaceans, typically by crushing the mineralized exoskeleton. This is costly Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California from the point of view of the bite forces involved, handling times, and the stresses 3Department of Biological Sciences, George inflicted on the predator's skeleton. It is not uncommon for durophagous taxa to dis- Washington University, Washington, D.C. play an ontogenetic shift from softer to harder prey items, implying that it is relatively 4Department of Ichthyology, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Ontario difficult for smaller animals to consume shelled prey. Batoid fishes (rays, skates, sawfishes, and guitarfishes) have independently evolved durophagy multiple times, Correspondence Kelsi M. Rutledge, Department of Ecology and despite the challenges associated with crushing prey harder than their own cartilagi- Evolutionary Biology, University of California nous skeleton. Potamotrygon leopoldi is a durophagous freshwater ray endemic to the Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095. Email: [email protected]; Xingu River in Brazil, with a jaw morphology superficially similar to its distant [email protected] durophagous marine relatives, eagle rays (e.g., Aetomylaeus, Aetobatus). We used sec- Present address ond moment of area as a proxy for the ability to resist bending and analyzed the Kelsi M.
    [Show full text]
  • Variable Changes in Cranial Structures Underlie Transitions to Durophagy in Moray Eels
    http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/675810 . Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press, The American Society of Naturalists, The University of Chicago are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The American Naturalist. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.120.194.194 on Fri, 2 May 2014 08:16:53 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions vol. 183, no. 6 the american naturalist june 2014 E-Article Imperfect Morphological Convergence: Variable Changes in Cranial Structures Underlie Transitions to Durophagy in Moray Eels David C. Collar,1,*JoshuaS.Reece,2 Michael E. Alfaro,3 Peter C. Wainwright,1 and Rita S. Mehta4 1. Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, California 95616; 2. Department of Biology, Valdosta State University, Valdosta, Georgia 31698; 3. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095; 4. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95060 Submitted October 8, 2013; Accepted December 27, 2013; Electronically published April 24, 2014 Online enhancement: appendixes. Dryad data: http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.h9r37.
    [Show full text]
  • WILDLIFE JOURNAL SINGITA PAMUSHANA, ZIMBABWE for the Month of March, Two Thousand and Nineteen
    WILDLIFE JOURNAL SINGITA PAMUSHANA, ZIMBABWE For the month of March, Two Thousand and Nineteen Temperature Rainfall Recorded Sunrise & Sunset Average minimum: 21˚C (69,8˚F) For the month: 69 mm Sunrise: 06:00 Minimum recorded: 18,8˚C (65,8˚F) For the year to date: 238 mm Sunset: 17:55 Average maximum: 31,1˚C (87,9˚F) Maximum recorded: 36,6˚C (97,8˚F) We can report that the final phase of lodge renovation at Singita Pamushana is going well, and us field guides have been busying ourselves with all kinds of projects and taking our annual leave while there are no guests visiting. Fortunately, we weren’t really affected by the cyclone that hit Mozambique in March, however the Malilangwe Trust and our staff donated goods to those most affected. We have had some good rain and the landscape is looking lush. Here’s a Sightings Snapshot for March: Lions • There’s been a very interesting development in that the River Pride has taken over part of the Southern Pride’s territory. We are now seeing the River Pride in the southern area and it’ll be interesting to see how this plays out. • Great news is that the three lion cubs that seemed to have disappeared a while ago have reappeared, and are in good health. Leopards • We’ve heard a lot of leopard calling at night, so there is much activity even though we are not on drive, and in the last two days we have had three leopard sightings! Cheetah • Cheetahs were spotted on staff drives.
    [Show full text]
  • (Crustacea) As Predators on Mollusca Through Geologic Time
    PALAIOS, 2010, v. 25, p. 167–182 Research Article DOI: 10.2110/palo.2009.p09-054r THE DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA) AS PREDATORS ON MOLLUSCA THROUGH GEOLOGIC TIME CARRIE E. SCHWEITZER1* and RODNEY M. FELDMANN 2 1Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave. NW, North Canton, Ohio 44720, USA; 2Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242, USA e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT decapods and lineages known to have modern congeners that are durophagous. The relationship between predator and prey is a persistent theme in There are five major means by which decapods crush shells or eat marine paleontology. Herein we focus on the decapod Crustacea, the shelled prey that, as they require specialization of the appendages (see shrimps, lobsters, and crabs, and their role as predators on the Mollusca Lau, 1987 on extant forms), might be recorded in the body fossil record. through geologic time. Five major means by which decapods crush shells There are also several types of feeding that may only chip the shells or or eat shelled prey might be recorded in the body-fossil record, as they simply pry them open, which are often not apparent in the fossil record. require specialization of the appendages. These include use of (1) All types of feeding on shelled organisms must affect evolution of the heterochelous first pereiopods, (2) molariform teeth on the fingers of shelled organism, based on recent studies that illustrate how predation the chelae, (3) a curved proximal tooth on the movable finger of the chela, takes precedence over other aspects of the environment in driving (4) calcified mandibles, and (5) flattened pereiopods (walking legs).
    [Show full text]
  • A Dental Microwear Texture Analysis of the Mio−Pliocene Hyaenids from Langebaanweg, South Africa
    A dental microwear texture analysis of the Mio−Pliocene hyaenids from Langebaanweg, South Africa DEANO D. STYNDER, PETER S. UNGAR, JESSICA R. SCOTT, and BLAINE W. SCHUBERT Stynder, D.D., Ungar, P.S., Scott, J.R., and Schubert, B.W. 2012. A dental microwear texture analysis of the Mio−Plio− cene hyaenids from Langebaanweg, South Africa. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 57 (3): 485–496. Hyaenids reached their peak diversity during the Mio−Pliocene, when an array of carnivorous species emerged alongside dwindling civet−like and mongoose−like insectivorous/omnivorous taxa. Significantly, bone−cracking morphological ad− aptations were poorly developed in these newly−emerged species. This, their general canid−like morphology, and the ab− sence/rarity of canids in Eurasia and Africa at the time, has led researchers to hypothesise that these carnivorous Mio−Pliocene hyaenas were ecological vicars to modern canids. To shed further light on their diets and foraging strate− gies, we examine and compare the dental microwear textures of Hyaenictitherium namaquensis, Ikelohyaena abronia, Chasmaporthetes australis, and Hyaenictis hendeyi from the South African Mio−Pliocene site of Langebaanweg with those of the extant feliforms Crocuta crocuta, Acinonyx jubatus, and Panthera leo (caniforms are not included because homologous wear facets are not directly comparable between the suborders). Sample sizes for individual fossil species are small, which limits confidence in assessments of variation between the extinct taxa; however, these Mio−Pliocene hyaenas exhibit surface complexity and textural fill volume values that are considerably lower than those exhibited by the living hyaena, Crocuta crocuta. Dental microwear texture analysis thus supports interpretations of craniodental evidence suggesting low bone consumption in carnivorous Mio−Pliocene hyaenas.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological and Functional Bases of Durophagy in the Queen Triggerfish, Balistes Vetula (Pisces, Tetraodontiformes)
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229737590 Morphological and functional bases of durophagy in the Queen Triggerfish, Balistes vetula (Pisces, Tetraodontiformes) Article in Journal of Morphology · February 1993 DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1052150202 CITATIONS READS 60 99 2 authors: Ralph G Turingan Peter C Wainwright Florida Institute of Technology University of California, Davis 62 PUBLICATIONS 1,214 CITATIONS 239 PUBLICATIONS 14,278 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Retinal topography maps in R: New tools for the analysis and visualization of spatial retinal data View project Ecomorphology View project All content following this page was uploaded by Ralph G Turingan on 18 December 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY 215:101-118 (1993) Morphological and Functional Bases of Durophagy in the Queen Triggerfish, Balistes vetula (Pisces, Tetraodontiformes) RALPH G. TURINGAN AND PETER C. WAINWRIGHT Department ofMarine Sciences, llniuersity of Puerto Rico, Mayagiiez, Puerto Rico 00681 (R.G.T.); Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-3050 (P.C.W.) ABSTRACT Tetraodontiform fishes are characterized by jaws specialized for powerful biting and a diet dominated by hard-shelled prey. Strong biting by the oral jaws is an unusual feature among teleosts. We present a functional morphological analysis of the feeding mechanism of a representative tetraodon- tiform, Balistes vetula. As is typical for the order, long, sharp, strong teeth are mounted on the short, robust jaw bones of B. vetula.
    [Show full text]
  • A Simple Morphological Predictor of Bite Force in Rodents
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Natural Resources Natural Resources, School of 5-30-2008 A Simple Morphological Predictor of Bite Force in Rodents Patricia W. Freeman University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Cliff A. Lemen University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natrespapers Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons Freeman, Patricia W. and Lemen, Cliff A., "A Simple Morphological Predictor of Bite Force in Rodents" (2008). Papers in Natural Resources. 142. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natrespapers/142 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural Resources, School of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Natural Resources by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in Journal of Zoology 275:4 (2008), pp. 418–422; doi 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2008.00459.x Copyright © 2008 Patricia W. Freeman & Cliff A. Lemen; journal compilation copyright © 2008 The Zoological Society of London. Used by permission. http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0952-8369 Submitted December 14, 2007; revised April 7, 2008; accepted April 14, 2008; published online May 30, 2008 A Simple Morphological Predictor of Bite Force in Rodents Patricia W. Freeman and Cliff A. Lemen School of Natural Resources and University of Nebraska State Museum, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA Corresponding author — P. W. Freeman, School of Natural Resources and University of Nebraska State Museum, 428 Hardin Hall, Uni- versity of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0974, USA; email [email protected] Abstract Bite force was quantified for 13 species of North American rodents using a piezo-resistive sensor.
    [Show full text]
  • Canines and Carnassials As Indicators of Sociality in Durophagous Hyaenids: Analyzing the Past to Understand the Present
    Canines and carnassials as indicators of sociality in durophagous hyaenids: analyzing the past to understand the present Juan Antonio Pérez-Claros* and Carlos Coca-Ortega* Departamento de Ecología y Geología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain * These authors contributed equally to this work. ABSTRACT We analyzed the lower and upper dentition of the family Hyaenidae along its evolutionary history from a multivariate point of view. A total of 13,103 individual measurements of the lengths and widths of canines and the main post-canine teeth (lower third and fourth premolar, lower first molar, and upper second, third, and fourth premolars) were collected for 39 extinct and extant species of this family. We analyzed these measurements using principal component analyses. The multivariate structure characterized the main groups of previously defined hyaenid ecomorphs. Strikingly, our analyses also detected differences between social hunting durophages (such as Crocuta crocuta) and solitary scavengers (such as Hyaena hyaena or Parahyaena brunnea). Concerning the hyaenid bauplan, social hunters have large carnassials and smaller canines, whereas solitary scavengers show the exact opposite morphological adaptations. Additionally, scavengers exhibited upper canines larger than lower ones, whereas hunters have upper and lower canines of similar size. It is hypothesized that sociality has led to an increase in carnassial length for hunting durophages via scramble competition at feeding. Such competition also penalizes adults from bringing food to cubs, which are consequently breastfed. On the other hand, it is also hypothesized that natural selection has led to solitary scavengers having large canines to transport carcasses Submitted 3 August 2020 to cubs.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecomorphology of Carnivora Challenges Convergent Evolution
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by LJMU Research Online Ecomorphology of Carnivora challenges convergent evolution Carlo Meloro1, Marcus Clauss2, Pasquale Raia3 1Research Centre in Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology, School of Natural Sciences and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, James Parsons Building Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, United Kingdom 2Clinic for Zoo Animals, Exotic Pets and Wildlife, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstr. 260, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland 3Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, dell’Ambiente e delle Risorse, Università degli Studi di Napoli ‘Federico II’, L.go San Marcellino 10, 80138, Napoli, Italy Corresponding Author: CARLO MELORO James Parsons Building Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF e-mail: [email protected] phone: +44 01512312312, fax: +44 01512312258 1 Abstract Convergent evolution is often reported in the mammalian order Carnivora. Their adaptations to particularly demanding feeding habits such as hypercarnivory and durophagy (consumption of tough food) appear to favour morphological similarities between distantly related species, especially in the skull. However, phylogenetic effect in phenotypic data might obscure such a pattern. We first validated the hypotheses that extant hypercarnivorous and durophagous large carnivorans converge in mandibular shape and form (=size and shape). Hypercarnivores generally exhibit smaller volumes of the multidimensional shape and form space than their sister taxa, but this pattern is significantly different from random expectation only when hunting behaviour categorisations are taken into account. Durophages share areas of the morphospace, but this seems to be due to factors of contingency. Carnivorans that hunt in pack exhibit incomplete convergence while even stronger similarities occur in the mandible shape of solitary hunters due to the high functional demands in killing the prey.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Scientist [Vol
    Biological Sciences RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DUROPHAGY AND FEEDING BIOMECHANICS IN GRAY TRIGGERFISH, BALISTES CAPRISCUS: INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION IN ECOLOGICAL MORPHOLOGY Christopher J. Durie 1 and Ralph G. Turingan Department of Biological Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL 32901, U.S.A. Abstract: The relationship between oral jaw biomechanics and consumption of hard prey was compared between Gulf of Mexico (Gulf) and Atlantic Ocean (Atlantic) populations of gray triggerfish fBalistes capriscus,) to examine intraspecific ecomorphological variation between these fish. Gut content analysis revealed that Atlantic fish fed more on hard-shelled invertebrates, such as crabs and sea urchins, than Gulf conspecifics. Difference in the relative magnitude of durophagy between Gulf and Atlantic triggerfish was associated with intraspecific differences in key biomechanical properties of the prey-capture and processing mechanism. The more durophagous Atlantic B. capriscus had more massive jaw bones and muscles than Gulf fish. The mechanical advantage of the lower jaw appeared to be less reflective of the dietary differences between fish from both locations. We hypothesize that B. capriscus has the ability to alter the development of its feeding mechanism to match the requirements for capturing and processing locally available prey-resources at post-recruitment habitats in the Atlantic and Gulf coasts of Florida. The central theme of ecomorphological studies is understanding the functional-ecological relationship between an organism and its environment. In fishes, previous studies have shown that the constructional design of feed- ing mechanisms constrain the diversity of prey that can be consumed be- cause the functional morphology of the feeding mechanism underlies the ability of fishes to capture and process prey (Liem, 1991; Turingan and Wainwright, 1993).
    [Show full text]