Our Search for Extrasolar Planets

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Our Search for Extrasolar Planets OUR SEARCH FOR EXTRASOLAR PLANETS CONTENTS 2 The exoplanet next door What have we learned about Proxima Centauri’s Earth-mass exoplanet? 6 The hunt for Earth’s bigger cousins Super-Earths and sub-Neptunes may host conditions like our home planet — or not. 12 Why we haven’t found another Earth. Yet. Finding Earth-like planets is still a challenge for astronomers. NASA/AMES/JPL-CALTECH A supplement to Astronomy magazine Next-door planets THE EXOPLANET NEXT DOOR There’s no star closer to us than Proxima Centauri — and now we know it has an Earth-mass planet in its habitable zone. by John Wenz THE HUNT FOR EXOPLANETS HAS, the Kepler catalog, says. “Twenty years ago, in some ways, been about the hunt for we were finding the first exoplanets, and it an Earth-like planet — something warm was totally exciting,” he says. Then there where water could exist. Headlines tout was the Kepler space telescope, which each discovery as “the most Earth-like found thousands of planets, including planet yet.” Many of those planets are far some in the habitable zone, and some distant. within a few dozen light-years of us. A new discovery published August 24 in And now there’s a planet named Nature hits closer to home, though, with an Proxima Centauri b of 1.3 Earth masses An artist’s impression of the surface of Earth-mass planet in the habitable zone of right next door, zipping around its star in Proxima Centauri b, drawn as if it has an its star. What’s more, that star is Proxima 11.2 days. Its distance of around 4.3 million atmosphere. Whether or not an atmosphere Centauri, only 4.24 light-years away. miles (7 million kilometers) from its star exists is not yet known. ESO/M. KORNMESSER This is a landmark discovery: finding a may seem tiny, at less than one-fifth the planet orbiting the closest star to the Sun. distance between Mercury and the Sun, but And so far, this exoplanet shows some sim- Proxima Centauri is the runt of the litter in star). In order for instruments to directly European Southern Observatory’s HARPS favor of the solid, concrete evidence. other things that could generate a spurious ilarity to Earth, as it’s roughly the mass of the Alpha Centauri system. At a diameter image them, planets must be very young instrument, a spectroscope that measures The researchers also were tight-lipped Doppler signal at 11 days, but after looking our planet and in just the right place where, of around 125,000 miles (200,000km), it’s and still glowing, or else very large — not tiny wobbles in a star’s light. about their findings, awaiting the end of at all that, they concluded the variability in if it has an atmosphere, liquid water could only 1.43 times the diameter of Jupiter. possible with the 5-billlion-year-old “Instead of applying for a few nights the peer review process. But as their the data is best explained by the presence exist on the surface. So how was there a planet hiding Proxima b. over a semester and repeating the same intended press conference approached, an of a planet.” This is as in our backyard as it gets. around the closest star to us, just waiting to thing over the years, what we did here is anonymous ESO astronomer leaked the Part of the caginess may arise from a “I think it actually marks a transition,” be discovered? The simple answer: Finding How to find a planet (that try to convince ESO it was worth doing story to the German press, sending Pale 2012 detection of a planet around another Jeffrey Coughlin, a SETI Institute scientist a planet is really hard. Kepler found thou- doesn’t want to be found) intensive campaigns to monitor the star 60 Red Dot into damage control, with the star in the system, Alpha Centauri B. That not involved in the study who assembles sands of planets by staring at 145,000 stars That’s why the Pale Red Dot project, tasked days in a row, only 20 minutes per night,” team keeping a tighter lid on its findings as planet, aptly named Alpha Centauri Bb, in a minute region of the sky at the tail end with finding a planet around our nearest principal investigator Guillem Anglada- rumors swirled in the astronomy commu- was too hot to sustain life, but instantly of Cygnus, waiting for the 1 percent chance neighbor, had to turn to indirect — but reli- Escudé said in a press conference. nity. Nature was forced to address the became the closest planet to us by default. a planet would pass directly in front of a able — methods of detection. The research- The end result is a planet as close to us rumors in its materials to the press before Or it would have, if it actually existed. star and cause a dip in its light, in a ers chose radial velocity, a process that looks as any could be, outside of a similar discov- the official announcement. The detection was riddled with prob- method known as transiting. for shifts in a star’s light due to the tug of ery in the same system. Going back to the 2013 detection: the lems, drawn out from spurious data, and The problem with Proxima Centauri b a planet, sometimes called the Doppler The project team, however, has been evidence was initially weak. Subsequent ignored a low signal-to-noise ratio in is that it doesn’t transit — at least not from method. Gravity induces subtle movements cautious every step of the way. They observations bolstered the planet’s case, but search of a sensational new planet, the kind our vantage point. In order to witness a that cause the light of a star to move toward ignored weak evidence of the planet’s exis- it wasn’t until the most recent observation science fiction has long dreamed of. transit, the orbital plane of a planet must the blue end of the light spectrum, which tence stretching back to 2013 in favor of campaign that proof for a planet and not Instead of becoming an Earth-shattering be at or near our line of vision, but not all means it’s moving toward us, or the red end stronger observations over the subsequent some other phenomenon solidified. Given revelation, serious doubts were cast on the solar systems have the same orientation. A of the spectrum, which means it’s moving three years, factoring in other studies of the this history, the team has been methodical detection, which also used radial velocity. star might have all of its planets aligned at away. Based on those changes, researchers star stretching back 16 years. Though fairly every step of the way. “[Pale Red Dot] actually just said the a 90-degree angle from us, with the planets can calculate a mass estimate, and the fre- convinced it’s a planet (above 99 percent “The authors do a great job in their most likely explanation is the presence of a orbiting in such a way that they never pass quency gives an idea of the orbit. certain, in fact) based on their data, the analysis. They follow all protocol and all planet,” Seager says. “If you remember in front of their star, enabling our tele- The planet itself was found over a series researchers still refer to the planet as a can- standard techniques,” Sara Seager, an MIT Alpha Centauri Bb … I just think there’s a scopes to detect them. Some planets have of nights from January 19 to March 31, didate. A possible second planet in the sys- exoplanet researcher and astrobiologist, concern in the community that every This artist’s view shows how Proxima Centauri been found by direct imaging (that is, a 2016, during which Proxima was moni- tem with a 60-day or longer orbit only gets says. “And they do say that they looked at retraction looks bad, even though that one may look from just behind Centauri b. ESO/M. KORNMESSER planet appearing in a photo along with its tored closely for subtle variations on the a passing mention in the paper, ignored in all the different types of stellar activity and wasn’t officially retracted.” 2 ASTRONOMY • OUR SEARCH FOR EXTRASOLAR PLANETS © 2016 Kalmbach Publishing Co. This material may not be reproduced in any WWW.ASTRONOMY.COM 3 form without permission from the publisher. www.Astronomy.com This could be especially compounded In transit by the planet’s tidal locking to its parent The Pale Red Dot team found a planet. It The Proxima Centauri system star. Because of the small separation in the seems to be the right mass and the right system — the distance between Centauri b distance from its star to put something and its star is just 5 percent the distance of somewhat similar to Earth in our cosmic Habitable zone between Earth and the Sun — the same backyard. But reality is way more compli- side of the planet faces Proxima Centauri at cated than that, as seen by the aforemen- Proxima Centauri b all times, much as the same side of the tioned histories of Venus and Mars. Minimum mass: 1.27 Earth masses Astronomers need to observe the planet Orbital period: 11.19 days Moon faces Earth at all times. However, if Centauri b still has an in greater detail in order to further charac- Sun Proxima Centauri atmosphere, it could reach temperatures up terize it.
Recommended publications
  • Book Review1.Fm
    Meteoritics & Planetary Science 42, Nr 9, 1695–1696 (2007) http://meteoritics.org Book Review Protostars and planets V, edited by Reipurth B, Jewitt D., and Keil K. Tucson, Arizona: The University of Arizona Press, 2007, 1024 p., cloth (ISBN 978-0-8165-2654-3). Some thirty years ago, planetary science and the study of star formation were different scientific fields with different practitioners who rarely interacted with one another. Planetary scientists, mostly geochemists and geophysicists, resided in geology departments whereas star formation was the domain of astronomers. All this has changed starting with Tom Gehrels who organized the first Protostars and Planets conference in January 1978 in Tucson. In the book that followed this conference, which was edited by Gehrels, he expressed the hope “to develop the interface between studies of star formation and those of the origin of the solar system.” This hope has been fulfilled beyond expectations. The first volume has been followed by four more in intervals of about seven years. Each book was preceded by a conference. The Protostars and Planets V Conference took place at the Hilton Waikoloa Village on the Big Island of Hawai‘i on October 24–28, 2005. The subsequent book appeared early this year. As its forerunners, it is part of the University of Arizona The arrangement of the chapters roughly follows the Space Science Series, which is devoted to different aspects of inferred prehistory of our own solar system. In the dense core solar system science. of a molecular cloud, gravity overcomes thermal and The rapid growth of this new interdisciplinary field magnetic pressures, leading to the formation of a star, in most between astronomy and planetary science is demonstrated by case actually of a binary star system.
    [Show full text]
  • SETI Is Part of Astrobiology
    SETI is Part of Astrobiology Jason T. Wright Department of Astronomy & Physics Center for Exoplanets and Habitable Worlds Penn State University Phone: (814) 863-8470 [email protected] I. SETI is Part of Astrobiology “Traditional SETI is not part of astrobiology” declares the NASA Astrobiology Strategy 2015 document (p. 150). This is incorrect.1 Astrobiology is the study of life in the universe, in particular its “origin, evolution, distribution, and future in the universe.” [emphasis mine] Searches for biosignatures are searches for the results of interactions between life and its environment, and could be sensitive to even primitive life on other worlds. As such, these searches focus on the origin and evolution of life, using past life on Earth as a guide. But some of the most obvious ways in which Earth is inhabited today are its technosignatures such as radio transmissions, alterations of its atmosphere by industrial pollutants, and probes throughout the Solar System. It seems clear that the future of life on Earth includes the development of ever more obvious technosignatures. Indeed, the NASA Astrobiology Strategy 2015 document acknowledges “the possibility” that such technosignatures exist, but erroneously declares them to be “not part of contemporary SETI,” and mentions them only to declare that we should “be aware of the possibility” and to “be sure to include [technosignatures] as a possible kind of interpretation we should consider as we begin to get data on the exoplanets.” In other words, while speculation on the nature of biosignatures and the design of multi-billion dollar missions to find those signatures is consistent with NASA’s vision for astrobiology, speculation on the nature of technosignatures and the design of observations to find them is not.
    [Show full text]
  • ASU Colloquium
    New Frontiers in Artifact SETI: Waste Heat, Alien Megastructures, and "Tabby's Star" Jason T Wright Penn State University SESE Colloquium Arizona State University October 4, 2017 Contact (Warner Bros.) What is SETI? • “The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence” • A field of study, like cosmology or planetary science • SETI Institute: • Research center in Mountain View, California • Astrobiology, astronomy, planetary science, radio SETI • Runs the Allen Telescope Array • Berkeley SETI Research Center: • Hosted by the UC Berkeley Astronomy Department • Mostly radio astronomy and exoplanet detection • Runs SETI@Home • Runs the $90M Breakthrough Listen Project Communication SETI The birth of Radio SETI 1960 — Cocconi & Morrison suggest interstellar communication via radio waves Allen Telescope Array Operated by the SETI Institute Green Bank Telescope Operated by the National Radio Astronomy Observatory Artifact SETI Dyson (1960) Energy-hungry civilizations might use a significant fraction of available starlight to power themselves Energy is never “used up”, it is just converted to a lower temperature If a civilization collects or generates energy, that energy must emerge at higher entropy (e.g. mid-infrared radiation) This approach is general: practically any energy use by a civilization should give a star (or galaxy) a MIR excess IRAS All-Sky map (1983) The discovery of infrared cirrus complicated Dyson sphere searches. Credit: NASA GSFC, LAMBDA Carrigan reported on the Fermilab Dyson Sphere search with IRAS: Lots of interesting red sources:
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected] Education Current Phd Student, University of Kansas
    Jonathan (Yoni) Brande - [email protected] Education ● Current PhD Student, University of Kansas, Department of Physics and Astronomy ● BS, Astronomy, with Computer Science minor, University of Maryland, College Park, Dec. 2017 Research and Employment ● 2020 - present - PhD Student and Graduate Teaching Asst. - University of Kansas Dept. Physics and Astronomy ○ Transiting exoplanet characterization through transmission spectroscopy. Advisor: Dr. Ian Crossfield ○ Fall 2020 - Graduate TA for intro physics labs. Supervisor: Prof. Jennifer Delgado ● 2018 - 2020 - NASA GSFC, Planetary Systems Lab, Exoplanets and Stellar Astrophysics Lab/University of Maryland, Dept. of Astronomy - Faculty Research Assistant - ○ Contributed to the Exoplanet Modeling and Analysis Center by developing exoplanet modeling tools, e.g. developing/refining the exoplanet-specific interface to GSFC’s Planetary Spectrum Generator tool and refining and validating intern-developed tools such as the Exoplanet Boundaries Calculator. The EMAC project is currently deployed as a community resource1. Advisor - Dr. Avi Mandell ○ Conducted research into the feasibility of using JWST’s Mid-Infrared Instrument for direct imaging of gaseous planets around nearby M-dwarfs. Developed generalized frameworks for conducting parallelized JWST simulations on the Goddard Private Cloud computing resource. Advisors - Dr. Thomas Barclay, Dr. Elisa Quintana ○ Contributed to TESS planet discovery and characterization efforts through dynamics, transit timing variation analysis of TESS targets, including the L98-59 system2. Advisors - Dr. Thomas Barclay, Dr. Elisa Quintana ● 2017 - Summer/Fall - 2018 Spring - University of Maryland, Department of Astronomy - ○ Efficient algorithms for representing the complex gravity fields of asteroids. Worked to develop novel methods for gravitational modeling of asteroids using analytic evaluations of the gravity of cubic mass elements.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Huber
    Asteroseismology & Exoplanets: A Kepler Success Story Daniel Huber SETI Institute / NASA Ames Research Center U Chicago Astronomy Colloquium April 2014 Collaborators Bill Chaplin, Andrea Miglio, Yvonne Elsworth, Tiago Campante & Rasmus Handberg (Birmingham) Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard, Hans Kjeldsen, Victor Silva Aguirre (Aarhus) Tim Bedding & Dennis Stello (Sydney) Ron Gilliland (PSU), Sarbani Basu (Yale), Steve Kawaler (Iowa State), Travis Metcalfe (SSI), Jaymie Matthews (UBC), Saskia Hekker (Amsterdam), Marc Pinsonneault & Jennifer Johnson (OSU), Eric Gaidos (Hawaii) Tom Barclay, Jason Rowe, Elisa Quintana & Jack Lissauer (NASA Ames / SETI) Josh Carter, Lars Buchhave, Dave Latham, Ben Montet & John Johnson (Harvard) Dan Fabrycky (Chicago) Josh Winn, Kat Deck & Roberto Sanchis-Ojeda (MIT) Andrew Howard, Howard Isaacson & Geoff Marcy (Hawaii, Berkeley) The Kepler Space Telescope • launched in March 2009 • 0.95 m aperture • 42 CCD’s , 105 sq deg FOV Borucki et al. (2008), Koch et al. (2010) Kepler Field of View Kepler Orbit Kepler obtained uninterrupted high-precision photometry of ~> 150,000 stars for 4 years to search for transiting exoplanets Asteroseismology in a Nutshell AstEroseismology? AstEroseismology? unnamed author, sometime in 1995 What causes stellar oscillations? Oscillations in cool stars are driven by turbulent surface convection (opacity in hot stars) Radial Order n displacement center surface number of nodes from the surface to the center of the star Spherical Degree l l = 0 Spherical Degree l l = 2 l = 0 Δν ~ 135 µHz for the Sun sound speed cs -1 3 1/2 Δν = (2 ∫dr/cs) ∝ (M/R ) (ω = n π c / L!) Ulrich (1986) δν ∝ ∫dcs/dr (Age) δν (individual frequencies) sound speed cs -1 3 1/2 Δν = (2 ∫dr/cs) ∝ (M/R ) (ω = n π c / L!) Ulrich (1986) νmax νmax ~ 3000 µHz for the Sun 0.5 -2 0.5 νmax ∝ νac ∝ g Teff ∝ M R Teff Brown et al.
    [Show full text]
  • ET First Extract
    May 2018 Evangelical TIMES 23 What is man (1): Are we alone in the universe? The first of three edited extracts from Edgar Andrews’ new book, What is Man? Adam, alien or ape? Prof Edgar Andrews It’s easy to confuse SETI with YETI because both relate to are more likely to swallow small bugs than little green men. the National Science Foundation, Ohio State University began creatures that probably don’t exist. The Yeti is a proverbial I should make it clear that the planet’s discoverers said constructing a radio observatory called ‘Big Ear’ — which beast that inhabits the Himalayas and walks upright like a nothing about bugs — that was an invention by the BBC. later undertook the world’s first continuous SETI program. human, but leaves huge footprints in the snow and strikes But their claim that Gliese 581c is a rocky planet like Earth On 15 August 1977, Jerry Ehman, a project volunteer at fear into the local populace. Related to America’s Bigfoot, it and has liquid water on its surface is itself based on a string the observatory, observed a strong signal and wrote ‘Wow!’ is sometimes called the Abominable Snowman (apparently of assumptions. on the recorded trace. Unsurprisingly known as the Wow! due to a mistranslation of its Nepalese name). An informed website respondent commented: ‘You must signal, some enthusiasts consider it the best candidate to date SETI, on the other hand, stands for ‘the search for extra- remember that neither the mass nor the radius of this planet for a cosmic radio signal from an artificial source.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hunt for Exomoons with Kepler (Hek)
    The Astrophysical Journal, 777:134 (17pp), 2013 November 10 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/777/2/134 C 2013. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. THE HUNT FOR EXOMOONS WITH KEPLER (HEK). III. THE FIRST SEARCH FOR AN EXOMOON AROUND A HABITABLE-ZONE PLANET∗ D. M. Kipping1,6, D. Forgan2, J. Hartman3, D. Nesvorny´ 4,G.A.´ Bakos3, A. Schmitt7, and L. Buchhave5 1 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; [email protected] 2 Scottish Universities Physics Alliance (SUPA), Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh, EH9 3HJ, UK 3 Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 05844, USA 4 Department of Space Studies, Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO 80302, USA 5 Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen University, Denmark Received 2013 June 4; accepted 2013 September 8; published 2013 October 22 ABSTRACT Kepler-22b is the first transiting planet to have been detected in the habitable zone of its host star. At 2.4 R⊕, Kepler-22b is too large to be considered an Earth analog, but should the planet host a moon large enough to maintain an atmosphere, then the Kepler-22 system may yet possess a telluric world. Aside from being within the habitable zone, the target is attractive due to the availability of previously measured precise radial velocities and low intrinsic photometric noise, which has also enabled asteroseismology studies of the star. For these reasons, Kepler-22b was selected as a target-of-opportunity by the “Hunt for Exomoons with Kepler” (HEK) project. In this work, we conduct a photodynamical search for an exomoon around Kepler-22b leveraging the transits, radial velocities, and asteroseismology plus several new tools developed by the HEK project to improve exomoon searches.
    [Show full text]
  • Lennon Reunion, Page 6 “There Will Be a Huge Transformation of the Page 2 July 4, 2013 TORRANCE TRIBUNE Calendar People FRIDAY, JULY 5 Torrance Blvd
    The Weekly Newspaper of Torrance Herald Publications - Torrance, El Segundo, Manhattan Beach, Hawthorne, Lawndale, & Inglewood Community Newspapers Since 1911 - (310) 322-1830 - Vol. 3, No. 26 - July 4, 2013 Torrance Salutes Independence Inside Day Sans Fireworks Show This Issue Business & Professional ......................10 Calendar...............................2 Classifieds ...........................9 Crossword/Sudoku ............9 Police Reports ....................3 Politically Speaking ...........4 Real Estate. .......................12 The fourth of July, the most American of holidays, was again marked without parades or city-sponsored fireworks due to budget cuts but it did not stop residents from celebrating. Seen here is a skydiver with the American flag at the Torrance Centennial Celebration. Photo by TerriAnn Ferren. Sports ...................................5 City Council Previews Del Amo TerriAnn in Torrance .........6 Fashion Center Renovations By Dylan Little mall. The mall will not look anywhere near and going to other places in Southern California On Tuesday, the Torrance City Council heard how it looks today,” said Scotto. “When 2015 to shop, they’re going to stop in Torrance at a presentation from Simon Property Group on comes around, I think people will be extremely our Del Amo Mall. Come Thanksgiving this planned upgrades to the Del Amo Fashion pleased with the results we’re going to have year, we’ll get the first taste of that with the Center. Chuck Davis with Simon Property Group with this mall. Instead of driving by our mall See City Council, page 2 made a PowerPoint presentation that showed a nearly unrecognizable mall. One of the major Weekend changes was to divide the mall into the “Fashion Center” (focusing on clothes and high-end retail) TerriAnn: A Lennon and “Market Square” (focusing on home goods Forecast and furniture).
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Workshop on Autonomy for Future NASA Science Missions
    NOTE: This document was prepared by a team that participated in the 2018 Workshop on Autonomy for Future NASA Science Missions. It is for informational purposes to inform discussions regarding the use of autonomy in notional science missions and does not specify Agency plans or directives. 2018 Workshop on Autonomy for Future NASA Science Missions: Ocean Worlds Design Reference Mission Reports Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 2 The Ocean Worlds Design Reference Mission Report .................................................................... 3 Ocean Worlds Design Reference Mission Report Summary ........................................................ 20 1 NOTE: This document was prepared by a team that participated in the 2018 Workshop on Autonomy for Future NASA Science Missions. It is for informational purposes to inform discussions regarding the use of autonomy in notional science missions and does not specify Agency plans or directives. Introduction Autonomy is changing our world; commercial enterprises and academic institutions are developing and deploying drones, robots, self-driving vehicles and other autonomous capabilities to great effect here on Earth. Autonomous technologies will also play a critical and enabling role in future NASA science missions, and the Agency requires a specific strategy to leverage these advances and infuse them into its missions. To address this need, NASA sponsored the
    [Show full text]
  • Life Beyond Earth the Search for Habitable Worlds in the Universe
    C:/ITOOLS/WMS/CUP-NEW/4181325/WORKINGFOLDER/COEN/9781107026179HTL.3D i [1–2] 27.6.2013 10:59AM Life Beyond Earth The Search for Habitable Worlds in the Universe With current missions to Mars and the Earth-like moon Titan, and many more missions planned, humankind stands on the verge of exciting progress and possible major discoveries in our quest for life in space. What is life and where can it exist? What searches are being made to identify conditions for life on other worlds? If extraterrestrial inhabited worlds are found, how can we explore them? Could humans survive beyond the Earth? In this book, two leading astrophysicists provide an engaging account of where we stand in our quest for habitable environments, in the Solar System and beyond. Starting from basic concepts, the narrative builds up scientifically, including more in-depth material as boxed additions to the main text. The authors recount fascinating recent discoveries, arising from space missions and from observations using ground-based telescopes, of possible life-related artefacts in Martian meteorites, of extrasolar planets, and of subsurface oceans on Europa, Titan and Enceladus. They also provide a forward look to exciting future missions, including the return to Venus, Mars and the Moon; further explorations of Pluto and Jupiter’s icy moons; and placing giant planet-seeking telescopes in orbit beyond Jupiter. showing how we approach the question of finding out whether the life that teems on our own planet is unique. This is an exciting, informative read for anyone interested in the search for habitable and inhabited planets, and makes an excellent primer for students keen to learn about astrobiology, habitability, planetary science and astronomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Breakthrough Propulsion Study Assessing Interstellar Flight Challenges and Prospects
    Breakthrough Propulsion Study Assessing Interstellar Flight Challenges and Prospects NASA Grant No. NNX17AE81G First Year Report Prepared by: Marc G. Millis, Jeff Greason, Rhonda Stevenson Tau Zero Foundation Business Office: 1053 East Third Avenue Broomfield, CO 80020 Prepared for: NASA Headquarters, Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) and NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) Washington, DC 20546 June 2018 Millis 2018 Grant NNX17AE81G_for_CR.docx pg 1 of 69 ABSTRACT Progress toward developing an evaluation process for interstellar propulsion and power options is described. The goal is to contrast the challenges, mission choices, and emerging prospects for propulsion and power, to identify which prospects might be more advantageous and under what circumstances, and to identify which technology details might have greater impacts. Unlike prior studies, the infrastructure expenses and prospects for breakthrough advances are included. This first year's focus is on determining the key questions to enable the analysis. Accordingly, a work breakdown structure to organize the information and associated list of variables is offered. A flow diagram of the basic analysis is presented, as well as more detailed methods to convert the performance measures of disparate propulsion methods into common measures of energy, mass, time, and power. Other methods for equitable comparisons include evaluating the prospects under the same assumptions of payload, mission trajectory, and available energy. Missions are divided into three eras of readiness (precursors, era of infrastructure, and era of breakthroughs) as a first step before proceeding to include comparisons of technology advancement rates. Final evaluation "figures of merit" are offered. Preliminary lists of mission architectures and propulsion prospects are provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Bayesian Analysis of the Astrobiological Implications of Life's
    Bayesian analysis of the astrobiological implications of life's early emergence on Earth David S. Spiegel ∗ y, Edwin L. Turner y z ∗Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ 08540,yDept. of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton Univ., Princeton, NJ 08544, USA, and zInstitute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe, The Univ. of Tokyo, Kashiwa 227-8568, Japan Submitted to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America Life arose on Earth sometime in the first few hundred million years Any inferences about the probability of life arising (given after the young planet had cooled to the point that it could support the conditions present on the early Earth) must be informed water-based organisms on its surface. The early emergence of life by how long it took for the first living creatures to evolve. By on Earth has been taken as evidence that the probability of abiogen- definition, improbable events generally happen infrequently. esis is high, if starting from young-Earth-like conditions. We revisit It follows that the duration between events provides a metric this argument quantitatively in a Bayesian statistical framework. By (however imperfect) of the probability or rate of the events. constructing a simple model of the probability of abiogenesis, we calculate a Bayesian estimate of its posterior probability, given the The time-span between when Earth achieved pre-biotic condi- data that life emerged fairly early in Earth's history and that, billions tions suitable for abiogenesis plus generally habitable climatic of years later, curious creatures noted this fact and considered its conditions [5, 6, 7] and when life first arose, therefore, seems implications.
    [Show full text]