DOCSLIB.ORG

Ak3 4 5 Q J6 J K63 Aq5 73

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ak3 4 5 Q J6 J K63 Aq5 73 49 48 An Early By Eric Kokish started to play seriously in 1967, of the available time, and when we at the Summer North American started the second hand there were only I Cham-pionships in Montreal, a couple of minutes left to play. my home town. I had less than 100 Lesson These were the cards: master points so I could not play in the Life Master Pairs, the Spingold, or the ♠ QJ1098 Master Mixed Teams. However, my ♥ AK3 very good friend George Mittelman and ♦ 4 I made good results in the secondary ♣ AKQ10 in events, one day scoring over 70% in ♠ 5 ♠ A742 two separate one-session side games. ♥10864 ♥Q Okay, so it wasn’t the big time, but we ♦ J6 ♦ K1098732 were only 20 years old and very eager, ♣986542 ♣J and I still remember running to the major events to kibitz the great players of the ♠ K63 Humility day, hoping some of their wisdom would ♥ J9752 touch us. Although I confess that today ♦ AQ5 I don’t run quite as much, my interest ♣ 73 in seeking the truth about the game still keeps me coming back for more. West North East South Four years later, most of my friends and Silver Kokish I believed we had become very good 3♦ Pass players and we had all had some success Pass Dbl Pass 3NT at the national and North American level. Pass Pass At the 1971 Can-Am Regional, I was 4♠ 5♦ playing with my great and good friend Pass 5♥ Pass 5NT Joey Silver, who had started to help Pass 6♣ Pass 6♠ me a couple of years earlier, to play set Pass 6NT Pass Pass matches for real money(!!) against his Pass unsuspecting rubber bridge friends. The Can-Am was our most important We bid quickly but with notable efficiency local tournament and as there were to 6NT, a particularly promising contract at far fewer events at each tournament in Matchpoints and one that seems destined those days, winning one of them was to succeed when we look at all the cards. still a special achievement. Joey and However, in my haste to catch up I took I were playing in the Open Pairs and the lead of the ♦J with the queen and doing quite well at the table but less well played on spades without cashing either a away from it, because we were following high club or a high heart in dummy, either a slow pair and never seemed to have of which would have produced a positive more than ten minutes per round to play result. two deals. (Let us not mention the absence of a plan As luck would have it, on one of these to counter the possibility of being tucked “short” rounds the first hand took most in dummy on the third or fourth round of 49 48 spades). East took the third spade and Perhaps trying to justify my club play to an high moments more than makes up for the played a second diamond, which I won extent only a masochist could appreciate, I inevitable disappointments. with the ace, discarding dummy’s ♥3, decided to play East for a second club and staking the fate of the deal on the club so discarded the ♥A from dummy. suit. As East was marked with 11 cards East’s delight in showing me the queen of in spades and diamonds, West was an hearts came as no surprise. enormous favourite to hold the ♣J, so And so it came to pass that the young Eric 1978 I stifled a giggle at my carelessness and and (I confess) somewhat arrogant Eric confidently led a club to the ten and jack, Kokish, aspiring to be one of Canada’s at which point I could not prevent myself greatest players, finished minus 600 in from laughing rather more loudly. a slam that was cold . umm . without East thought it was pretty funny too and a finesse . demonstrated his joy at being given an It occurred to me that I might have a future in unexpected entry by loudly thumbing each the game when I was able to report the deal of his five remaining high diamonds onto to the Daily Bulletin (perhaps only moments the table as the Director hovered over us. ahead of the thundering hordes, it’s true) with As you may already have foreseen, my a smile on my face, despite the gaping wound Eric Kokish went on to become one of greatest moment in bridge was not yet in my heart. the best bridge players in the world, complete. As East led his last diamond, We did not win the 1971 Can-Am Open Pairs. winning many international events we were down to a three-card ending: Although I can’t confirm with confidence and leading Canada to a close second place in the 1995 Bermuda Bowl in ♠ Q that this incident convinced me not to take myself so seriously, it certainly Bejing. He is one of the most respected ♥ A contributed mightily. Years later, my analysts and theoreticians of the game ♦ - Australian mate Bobby Richman pointed and has built a great reputation as a A ♣ out that “we’re all little error machines” coach: amongst others he has trained ♠ - ♠ 7 with an unlimited capacity to make them, in the past the Israeli, the Dutch and ♥10 ♥Q batteries not included. Appreciating that the Indonesian national teams and has ♦ - ♦ 2 makes it so much easier to deal with our been coaching for quite a few years the ♣92 ♣- inadequacies. world-beating Nickell team (Hamman- ♠ - Soloway, Meckstroth-Rodwell and I still look forward to the next major Nickell-Freeman). J9 ♥ tournament because there’s sure to be We are delighted that he accepted ♦ - something new and interesting that I to collaborate with us and that he has ♣ 7 haven’t experienced before – places to expressed his availability to answer I knew that East held another spade, but go, people to see – something special questions from readers through his was his remaining card a heart or a club? worth keeping. Knowing that there will be e-mail: [email protected] 45 44 By Eric Kokish In this column Canada‛s was Roy Hughes, South Irving Litvack, could establish the ♦6 (leading the ten peripathetic Bridge ambassador both terrific players who have remained to smother the seven) and reverted to joins us for a monthly visit, sharing largely unsung on the international scene diamonds, declarer covering the seven. his insights and Bridge experiences through no fault of their own. Declarer ruffed and led a trump to the and offering solutions to vexing North-South vulnerable; East deals jack, and soon lost a trump to West for problems. He will also answer one down. questions by our readers. ♠ K972 ♥ AJ72 The bottom line is that Bridge has been Moments later, South was kicking himself. Q1065 very good to me. The game has given ♦ “I should have made it. Instead of playing me the chance to meet some wonderful ♣ 10 a trump to the jack, say that I play ♣K and people, to visit exotic, intriguing countries, ♠ AJ864 ♠ Q103 another high club. West discards a spade, to acquire some important vocabulary but I ruff my winner in dummy, play ♠K, ♥ K96 ♥ 10 (how to order lunch) in many different spade ruff, East following. By now I know languages, and to try my hand at virtually ♦ 973 ♦ KJ42 that West has five spades, two clubs, and every aspect of this fascinating pastime. ♣ A3 ♣ 86542 (apparently) three diamonds, which leaves him with three trumps. I intend to play him Bridge has provided me with frequent ♠ 5 opportunities to show grace in defeat for the ♥K in any case, but now I can see while tantalizing me with the dream of ♥ Q8543 that the best play is to lead the queen displaying grace in victory at the highest ♦ A8 from my hand, winning against singleton levels. It has taught me that there is ♣ KQJ97 nine or ten in East. If West covers, I win, always something to learn and that behind ruff myself in with a spade, and finesse every ugly moment there lies something West North East South against the other `minor’ trump honour.” of great beauty. Hughes Litvack Perhaps spotting the easy-to-overlook I have been addicted to the game Pass 1♥ winning line so soon after missing it should since my early teens: it has often been 1♠ 2♠* Dbl 4♥ earn a consolation prize. In practice, frustrating, sometimes amusing, always Pass Pass Pass however, it only manages to deflect the full of surprises and perhaps it’s that *= raise to at least 3♥ player’s focus in a non-productive way: uncertainty about what lies ahead that when the cards are put back in the box, keeps me coming back for more. Opening Lead: ♦3 the deal is history. This column is dedicated to those of you who share at least a part of this love With 4♠ doubled likely to cost 500 points If there is something of special value to affair. Your secret is safe with me. I will and little chance to jockey North/South to be happy to answer your questions on be learned from this deal, let me suggest the five-level, it will be much better bridge in bridge and the most interesting ones to you that it is not the fancy handling of the long run to defend 4♥ with the East/West will be published here in your bridge the trump suit that would have enabled cards.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Slam Bidding Lesson
    Slam Bidding and Modified Scroll Bids By Neil H. Timm In this Bridge Bit, I explore more fully Slam bidding techniques, some old and some perhaps new. To reach a small slam, the partnership should have roughly thirty-three Bergen points. In addition to a trump fit and count, slams require controls (aces, kings, voids, and singletons). The more controls between the partners, the easier the slam. To evaluate whether or not the partnership has the required controls, one uses cuebids with perhaps the 5NT trump ask bid (Grand Slam Force), and Blackwood Conventions. Blackwood Conventions reveal how many aces and kings, while cuebidding or control showing bids reveal where they reside. To make a slam, one usually requires first-round control in three suits and second round control in the fourth suit. It is possible to make a slam missing two aces, provided the missing ace is opposite a void, and the second missing ace is replaced by or is opposite a second-round control (a king or a singleton). When looking for a possible slam, one often asks the following questions. 1. What cards should my partner have to be able to make a slam? 2. How may I obtain the required information? 3. Are there any bidding techniques or conventions that I can use to obtain the required information? 4. If my partner does not have the required cards for a slam, can I stop short of slam, and if not is the risk of going down worth it? We shall review techniques to help the partnership find the required information for making a slam! However, with some hands one needs only to count points to reach a slam.
    [Show full text]
  • Acol Bidding Notes
    SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION The following notes are designed to help your understanding of the Acol system of bidding and should be used in conjunction with Crib Sheets 1 to 5 and the Glossary of Terms The crib sheets summarise the bidding in tabular form, whereas these notes provide a fuller explanation of the reasons for making particular bids and bidding strategy. These notes consist of a number of short chapters that have been structured in a logical order to build on the things learnt in the earlier chapters. However, each chapter can be viewed as a mini-lesson on a specific area which can be read in isolation rather than trying to absorb too much information in one go. It should be noted that there is not a single set of definitive Acol ‘rules’. The modern Acol bidding style has developed over the years and different bridge experts recommend slightly different variations based on their personal preferences and playing experience. These notes are based on the methods described in the book The Right Way to Play Bridge by Paul Mendelson, which is available at all good bookshops (and some rubbish ones as well). They feature a ‘Weak No Trump’ throughout and ‘Strong Two’ openings. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ INDEX Section 1 Introduction Chapter 1 Bidding objectives & scoring Chapter 2 Evaluating the strength of your hand Chapter 3 Evaluating the shape of your hand . Section 2 Balanced Hands Chapter 21 1NT opening bid & No Trumps responses Chapter 22 1NT opening bid & suit responses Chapter 23 Opening bids with stronger balanced hands Chapter 24 Supporting responder’s major suit Chapter 25 2NT opening bid & responses Chapter 26 2 Clubs opening bid & responses Chapter 27 No Trumps responses after an opening suit bid Chapter 28 Summary of bidding with Balanced Hands .
    [Show full text]
  • Tt Fall 12 Web.Pub
    VOL. 53 No. 3 FALL 2012 Meet Michigan’s winning mini-Spingold squad Editor’s note: A team of five 20-something Ann Arbor players won the 0-1500 mini- Spingold KO, a multi- day limited national championship, at the summer North Ameri- can Bridge Champion- ships in Philadelphia. A month earlier, they also won the Sunday Winners of the mini-Spingold 0-1500 Swiss Teams at the KO Teams: (front) Jin Hu and Jonathan Fleischmann; (back) Max Glick, Zach- Toledo Regional. ary Scherr and Zachary Wasserman. Here are their stories: Jonathan Fleischmann ter. I'm an attorney less than a year out of law school. I'm 24 years old and live in I started playing in 1999 Bloomfield Hills with my fa- (Continued on page 22) ther, two brothers, and a sis- DON’T FORGET TO VOTE The annual election for MBA Board of Directors will be held during the last four days of the October regional. If you cannot be there on one of those days, you can still vote by complet- ing and sending in an absentee ballot. See page 5. Candi- dates’ pictures and statements appear on pages 6 and 7. Michigan Bridge Association Unit #137 2012 VINCE & JOAN REMEY MOTOR CITY REGIONAL October 8-14, 2012 Site: William Costick Center, 28600 Eleven Mile Road, Farmington Hills MI 48336 (between Inkster and Middlebelt roads) 248-473-1816 Intermediate/Newcomers Schedule (0-299 MP) Single-session Stratified Open Pairs: Tue. through Fri., 1 p.m. & 7 p.m.; Sat., 10 a.m. & 2:30 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • System Notes
    System Notes James Sundstrom Nathan Savir April 9, 2009 Notation Legend M Either Major. If used multiple times, it always refers to the same major. For example, 1M-2| -2M means either the auction 1~ -2| - 2~ or 1♠ -2| -2♠ , no other auction. m Either minor. As per M. OM Other major. This is only used after 'M', such as 1m-1M-2NT-3OM. om Other minor. As per OM. R Raise. Used in some of the step based system to mean a simple raise, such as 1~ -2~ . DR Double Raise. Q Cuebid. Acknowledgements Special thanks are owed to Blair Seidler, without whose teaching I probably would not ever have written these notes. If I did write them, they surely would not be nearly as good as they are. These notes are a (mostly very-distant) relative of his Carnage notes, though a few sections have been borrowed directly from Carnage. 1 Contents I Non-Competitive Auctions4 1 Opening Bid Summary6 2 Minor Suit Auctions7 2.1 Minor-Major................................7 2.1.1 Suit Bypassing Agreements...................7 2.1.2 New Minor Forcing........................7 2.1.3 Reverses..............................8 2.2 Minor Oriented Auctions.........................8 2.3 NT Oriented auctions...........................8 2.4 Passed Hand Bidding...........................8 3 Major Suit Auctions9 3.1 1 over 1 Auctions.............................9 3.2 Major Suit Raise Structure........................9 3.2.1 Direct Raises...........................9 3.2.2 Bergen...............................9 3.2.3 Jacoby 2NT............................9 3.2.4 3NT................................ 10 3.2.5 Splinters.............................. 10 3.3 Passed Hand................................ 10 3.3.1 Drury..............................
    [Show full text]
  • The Perceptions of Policymakers on the Transfer Pathway in Texas Public
    THE PERCEPTIONS OF POLICYMAKERS ON THE TRANSFER PATHWAY IN TEXAS PUBLIC HIGHER EDUCATION Kimberly A. Faris Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2016 APPROVED: Amy Fann, Major Professor Beverly Bower, Committee Member Marc Cutright, Committee Member Celia Williamson, Committee Member Daniel Chen, Program Coordinator for Higher Education Jan Holden, Chair of the Department of Counseling and Higher Education Jerry Thomas, Dean of the College of Education Costas Tsatsoulis, Interim Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Faris, Kimberly. The Perceptions of Policymakers on the Transfer Pathway in Texas Public Higher Education. Doctor of Philosophy (Higher Education), May 2016, 272 pp., 1 table, references, 144 titles. Community college students transfer to public universities experiencing a pathway filled with complexity and inequity. Transfer students are not able to graduate at the same pace as native students at the university and complete their baccalaureate degrees 18% below the rate of native students. Policymakers have attempted to address the baccalaureate gap. This qualitative study explored the perspectives of Texas policymakers and policy influencers on the efficacy of policies intended to improve transfer outcomes. This study investigated what experience participants have with transfer policy, what their perceptions of the transfer pathway are, and how their voices can refine an understanding of policy development and ways to improve student persistence. Purposeful sampling was used to explore the perspectives of 14 Texas policymakers and those that influence policy. Findings revealed that significant gaps exist between expectations and student realities and that the completion agenda is driving policy decisions. Participants perceived that transfer students have been ignored in the completion metrics, which influence institutional priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Bidding Notes
    Bidding Notes Paul F. Dubois February 19, 2015 CONTENTS 1 Preliminaries 6 1.1 How to Use This Book.....................................6 1.2 Casual Partners.........................................7 1.3 Acknowledgments.......................................7 1.4 Notation and Nomenclature...................................7 1.5 The Captain Concept......................................8 2 Hand Evaluation 9 2.1 Basic System..........................................9 2.1.1 Adjusting to the Auction................................ 10 2.1.2 Losing Trick Count................................... 10 2.2 Bergen Method......................................... 11 2.3 Examples............................................ 11 2.4 What Bid To Open....................................... 11 3 Reverses 13 3.1 Reverses by Opener....................................... 13 3.1.1 Responding To Opener’s Reverse........................... 13 3.2 Reverses By Responder..................................... 14 4 Opening Notrump 15 4.1 How To Choose A Response To 1N.............................. 15 4.1.1 Responding With No Major Suit Or Long Minor................... 16 4.1.2 Responding With A Major Suit Or Long Minor.................... 16 4.2 Stayman Convention...................................... 16 4.3 Major Transfers......................................... 17 4.3.1 When the transfer is doubled or overcalled...................... 18 4.3.2 Interference before transfers.............................. 19 4.4 When Responder Is 5-4 In The Majors............................
    [Show full text]
  • Applying Case-Based Reasoning to the Game of Bridge
    Applying Case-Based Reasoning to the Game of Bridge Jacob Bellamy-McIntyre A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Postgraduate Diploma of Science in Computer Science, University of Auckland, 2008 1 Abstract Bridge provides a challenging problem for Artificial Intelligence research due to the game being stochastic (from the shuffling of the cards), hidden information (from not being able to see opponents cards) and from the general complexities of the game. Research into Computer Bridge is in its relative infancy, with the American Contract Bridge League holding the first World Championships Computer Bridge competition in 1997. With Bridge being a game that is more probabilistic and intuitive than Chess, it may be a better avenue of research for evaluating human-like intelligence. This paper will explore the possibility of applying Case Base Reasoning to the game of Bridge and will discuss the problems that arise from trying to do so, while comparing Case Base Reasoning to other techniques used in Artificial Intelligence. 2 Table of Contents 1. Case-Based Reasoning 1.1 Introduction ……………………………… 5 1.2 The Domain and Adaptation …………….. 8 1.3 The Case and the Case Base …………….. 10 1.4 The Similarity Function …………………. 11 2. Games in AI 2.1 Introduction ………………………………………….14 2.2 Chess ………………………………………………. 15 2.3 Checkers …………………………………………… 17 2.4 Poker ………………………………………………. 19 2.5 Bridge ……………………………………………… 25 2.6 Other Games ……………………………………... 28 3. The Game of Bridge 3.1 Introduction to Bridge ………………………........... 30 3.2 The Bidding Phase …………………………….…… 30 3.3 Play of the Hand …………………………………... 31 3.4 The Value of a Hand ……………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Slam Bidding Why Bid a Slam? Just Like There Is a Bonus for Being in the Game Level, There Is a Bonus for Being in the Slam Levels
    Slam Bidding Why bid a slam? Just like there is a bonus for being in the game level, there is a bonus for being in the slam levels. A small slam is a contract at the 6-level, Bidding and making a small slam is worth 500 bonus points when not vul and 750 bonus points when vul. A grand slam is a contract at the 7-level, Bidding and making a small slam is worth 1000 bonus points when not vul and 1500 bonus points when vul. Decision #1: Do you have enough overall strength? When considering a slam, you have to first decide if your two hands have the power to take 12 or 13 tricks once you get the lead. You can often add your points to the number partner has shown to determine your chances. For "normal", fairly balanced hands, use these guidelines: • To make a small slam (bid of 6) -- you need 33 pts. • To make a grand slam (bid of 7) -- you need 37 pts. You may make a slam with fewer points if your hands have other features to make up for what you lack in high-card strength. These include: • Extra trumps -- you need at least an 8-card fit to bid a suit slam, but stronger fits produce more tricks. You may score an extra trick for each trump you have over 8. • Long, strong side suits -- if you can set up and run a long side suit, the small cards can be as valuable as honors. • Short suits -- once you know you have a trump fit, add in your distribution points to determine your hand's full value.
    [Show full text]
  • What's Standard?
    play bridge What’s Standard? Using Grant Standard: Responding to 1NT — by David Lindop ߜ Previous articles in this series, the Transfers and Slam ♠ A J A hand like this is a ♥ K Q 9 8 5 Grant Basic and Grant Standard With a five-card or longer major, it little more awkward. ♦ A Q 10 7 Summary Charts, and corresponding seems automatic to start with a We aren’t sure if we convention cards, can be found at ♣ 7 3 transfer when partner opens 1NT. belong in slam and www.audreygrant.com. However, if we also have 16 or more we also don’t know whether we or responding to 1NT, the points and are interested in reaching belong in hearts, diamonds, or Summary Chart gives an slam, we must look ahead. A simple notrump. Fortunately, we can do a Foverview of our methods: raise after a transfer is only inviting little exploration because a new suit game and a jump to game is a signoff. is forcing after a Jacoby transfer. RESPONSES How do we show slam interest? We can begin the auction like this: ♣ 2 : Stayman ♠ KJ 3 Here we have 16 OPENER RESPONDER ♦ 2 : 5+ hearts (transfer) ♥ K J 9 7 4 high-card points plus 1NT 2♦ ♥ 2 : 5+ spades (transfer) ♦ A Q 1 length point for the 2♥ 3♦ 2♠: transfer to 3♣ ♣ Q 9 4 ♦ (to sign off in clubs or diamonds) five-card suit. That’s Our transfer bid of 2 shows five or enough to invite slam but not enough more hearts and our subsequent bid 3♣/3♦: 6+ suit; invit.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard American System Notes Noble Shore
    Standard American System Notes Noble Shore Pages Definitions 2 1NT opening 3-10 1H/S openings 11-14 1D/C openings 15-18 Weak openings 19-21 Strong openings 22-23 Overcalls 24-25 Takeout Doubles 26-27 Slam Bidding 28-29 Carding 30 Sample ACBL Convention Cards 31-32 Index of Conventions 33 Author’s Note 34 Definitions A balanced hand contains no singletons or voids and at most one doubleton. Points refer to a total value of a hand, including shape. HCP refers only to a hand’s high-card points. A natural suited bid shows 4+ cards in its suit. A natural notrump bid shows a desire to play in notrump. A non-natural bid is called an artificial bid. A convention is a commonly used artificial bid that has been given a name. Conventions are not part of Standard American, but many are commonly or nearly-universally played. A forcing bid demands a bid from partner if the next opponent passes. A forcing bid is also known as one- round-forcing. A signoff is a bid that strongly requests a pass or correction to another suit shown by the player signing off. Partner normally may not make a bid in any suit not shown by the signing-off player. A signoff usually occurs when the captain of the auction places the final contract. An invitational bid communicates that the partnership should bid a game unless partner has very minimal strength for previous actions. A game-forcing bid means that the partnership cannot play any contract below 3NT.
    [Show full text]
  • Bidding and Play Definitions
    Bidding and Play Definitions for BridgeClues2.Com BC Bidding_PlayDefs.doc Contents Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. POINT COUNT 1 2.1 High Card Points (HCP) 1 2.2 Long Suit Distribution Points 1 2.3 Short Suit Distribution Points 1 2.4 Points 1 3. SUIT BIDS 2 3.1 Five Card Majors 2 3.2 Forcing 1NT over a Major by an Unpassed Hand 2 3.3 Convenient Minor Openings 2 3.4 Limit Raises 2 3.5 Preemptive Minor Suit Raises 2 3.6 Preemptive Jumps to Game in Partner’s Major Opening 2 3.7 Opening Four in a Major 2 3.8 Preemptive Three Bids 2 3.9 Weak Jump Overcalls 3 3.10 Weak Jump Responses 3 3.11 Weak Two Bids 3 3.12 Balancing in a Suit 3 3.13 Opening in Third Seat 3 3.14 Opening in Fourth Seat 4 4.0 NOTRUMP BIDS 4 4.1 Bid of 1NT – 15 to 17 HCP's 4 4.2 Bid of 2NT – 20 to 21 HCP's 4 4.3 Opening Bid of 2C with a Rebid of 2NT – 22 to 24 HCP's 4 4.4 Opening Bid of 2C with a Rebid of 3NT – 25 to 27 HCP's 4 4.5 3H or 3S Response to a 1NT Opening Bid 4 4.6 Balancing in Notrump 5 4.7 Stayman 5 4.8 Drop Dead Stayman (Garbage Stayman or Crawling Stayman) 5 4.9 Gerber 5 4.10 Super Gerber 5 4.11 Quantitative 4NT 6 4.12 Jacoby Transfers 6 4.13 Texas Transfers 6 BC Bidding_PlayDefs.doc ii 4.14 Relay in competition 6 4.15 ACOL 3NT 6 4.16 Gambling 3NT 6 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Keeping up with Conventions Slam Bidding — by David Lindop
    play bridge Keeping Up With Conventions Slam Bidding — by David Lindop ߜ This series of articles looks at how SLAM CONVENTIONS Gerber □: 4NT: Blackwood □ RKC □ 1430 □ to fill out the standard convention card. Previous articles can be found by visiting the Better Bridge News section at www.AudreyGrant.com. vs Interference: DOPI □ DEPO □ Level: ROPI □ Diagram 1 - The area on the convention card covering slam bidding t’s time to look at a small but important area of the convention Gerber 13 tricks: one spade, two hearts, card, the section on SLAM seven diamonds and three clubs. I Now suppose ♠ 6 CONVENTIONS (see Diagram 1). have none. Of course, you might partner opens ♥ K 4 A lot of points are at stake when the hold your breath for just a moment, 1NT and you ♦ K Q 10 9 7 5 3 partnership is considering whether hoping you haven’t miscalculated! have this hand. ♣ KQ 5 to bid slam, so you want to have If partner were to reply 4NT, You only have 13 high-card points firm agreements in this area. showing three aces, you would know but 3 length points for the seven-card only one ace is missing and could Slam Bidding on Power suit puts you in the slam zone. When jump to 6♦, expecting to have a good bidding slams with unbalanced As a guideline, the partnership chance at 12 tricks. If partner were to hands, where you are adding points needs about 33 or more combined reply 4♠, showing two aces, you for length or shortness, it is usually points to consider bidding to a small would settle for 5♦, knowing the best to check for controls — aces and slam and about 37 or more for a partnership is missing two aces.
    [Show full text]