DOCSLIB.ORG

9023 Extracts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
9023 Extracts FREEDOM FREEDOM Human rights matter on the internet. Without freedom of expression, people OF cannot participate in everything that the information society has to offer. EXPRESSION Yet online free speech is in danger. Between state laws, private rules and OF EXPRESSION algorithms, full participation in the online communicative space faces many challenges. This publication explores the profound impact of the internet on AND THE INTERNET free expression and how it can be effectively secured online. AND THE The second, updated edition of this introduction into the protection of freedom of expression online answers essential questions regarding the extent and limits of freedom of expression online and the role of social INTERNET networks, courts, states and organisations in online communication spaces. In clear language, with vivid examples spanning two decades of internet law, the authors answer questions on freedom of expression in cyberspace. – Addressing issues from the protection of bloggers to the right to access online information, the publication also shows the importance of the edition 2nd revised and Updated standard-setting, monitoring and promotion activities of international and non-governmental organisations and includes a chapter on relevant national practice. It pays special attention to the role of European human rights law and the Council of Europe as this region’s most important human rights organisation. An invaluable resource for students of law, politics, international relations and technology as well as for diplomats and civil society actors, this publication demonstrates how the Council of Europe contributes to ensuring that everyone’s voice online can be heard. This is key to sustainable, human rights- oriented and people-centred digitalisation. Prems 006020 Prems ENG The Council of Europe is the continent’s leading Wolfgang Benedek human rights organisation. It comprises 47 member Updated and revised states, including all members of the European and Matthias C. Kettemann Union. All Council of Europe member states have 2nd edition www.coe.int signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights, a treaty designed to protect human rights, democracy and the rule of law. The European Court of Human Rights oversees the implementation of the Convention in the member states. http://book.coe.int €29/US$58 ISBN 978-92-871-9023-9 FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND THE INTERNET Wolfgang Benedek and Matthias C. Kettemann Updated and revised 2nd edition Council of Europe Publishing The opinions expressed in this work are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Council of Europe. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated, reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic (CD-Rom, internet, etc.) or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the Directorate of Communication (F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex or [email protected]). Cover photo: Shutterstock Cover design: Documents and Publications Production Department, Council of Europe Layout: Jouve, Paris Council of Europe Publishing F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex http://book.coe.int ISBN 978-92-871-9023-9 © Council of Europe, August 2020 Printed at the Council of Europe Contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 7 TABLE OF CASES 11 PREFACE 17 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION: THE CHALLENGES OF ENSURING FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION ON THE INTERNET 23 CHAPTER 2. THE CONTENT OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION ONLINE 29 2.1. Main elements of the right 29 2.1.1. Freedom of opinion 32 2.1.2. Freedom of information 33 2.1.3. Freedom of the press and media 36 2.1.4. Freedom of international communication 39 2.1.5. Freedom of artistic expression 40 2.1.6. Freedom of cultural expression 41 2.1.7. Freedom of science 42 2.1.8. A new freedom? Internet freedom and openness 43 2.1.9. Right to anonymity 44 2.1.10. Right to whistle-blowing 45 2.2. Corollary rights: freedom of assembly and association, and the rights to education and access to knowledge 46 2.3. Right to access to the internet 49 CHAPTER 3. RESTRICTIONS ON FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION ONLINE 55 3.1. Principles and problems 55 3.2. Criteria for restrictions and the practice of the Court in internet cases 57 3.2.1. Criteria for restrictions 57 3.2.2. The practice of the Court 58 The margin of appreciation 58 The role of context 60 Protection of the rights of others 61 Information already available on the internet 62 Specific responsibilities of the media 63 Responsibilities of politicians 64 3.3. Conclusion 65 CHAPTER 4. STANDARD SETTING BY THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE AND NON-STATE ACTORS 67 4.1. The context: the role of human rights in internet governance 67 4.2. Activities of the Council of Europe: awareness-raising and standard setting 68 4.2.1. Recommendations and declarations 69 4.2.2. Guidelines and recommendations for business 79 4.3. Activities of non-state actors 84 4.3.1. The Charter of Human Rights and Principles for the internet 84 Page 3 4.3.2. Standard setting in the private sector 85 4.3.3. Transparency to protect freedom of expression 87 CHAPTER 5. SPECIFIC ISSUES 91 5.1. Internet content regulation and freedom of expression 92 5.2. Information and disinformation 93 5.2.1. The consequences of misinformation 94 5.3. Technological neutrality and freedom of expression 95 5.4. Network neutrality and freedom of expression 96 5.5. Characteristics of protected and unprotected speech online 98 5.6. Fighting online hate speech 99 5.7. Defamation, reputation and freedom of expression online 105 5.8. Protection of children in light of freedom of expression 109 5.9. Freedom of expression and internet domain names 110 5.10. The role of internet intermediaries: reconfiguring their rights and duties 114 5.11. Regulatory approaches to freedom of expression in social networks 117 5.12. Private and public spaces on the internet 120 5.13. Freedom of expression and algorithms 124 5.13.1. Training data 126 5.13.2. Overblocking 127 5.13.3. Lack of explainability 127 5.14. Whistle-blowing as a human right 129 5.15. Transcending the national level 131 CHAPTER 6. RELEVANT PRACTICE ON THE NATIONAL LEVEL 133 6.1. Jurisdiction and freedom of expression online 134 6.1.1. France v. US and Yahoo v. LICRA: a tale of two countries and two courts 134 6.1.2. UK: the internet comes under national jurisdiction 135 6.1.3. European Union: the right to be forgotten and its limits 136 6.1.4. Austria: worldwide obligation to search for unlawful content? 137 6.2. Access and freedom of expression online 139 6.2.1. Europe: restrictions placed on prisoners’ access to certain sites 140 6.2.2. China and Turkey: blocking access to Wikipedia 141 6.2.3. India: shutdown of internet access and cell phone services in Kashmir 142 6.2.4. Internet access as a protected right in 20 Council of Europe member states 143 Germany: the internet as an essential part of life 144 Finland: a right to broadband? 145 6.2.5. Cloudflare terminates service for 8chan in response to US shootings 145 6.3. Copyright and freedom of expression online 146 6.3.1. France: the limits to enforcing copyright 146 6.3.2. European Parliament: EU Copyright Directive 147 6.3.3. Italy: Court holds video-sharing platform liable for content uploaded by users 148 6.4. Public and private violations of freedom of expression online 149 6.4.1. Hate speech disrupts freedom of expression online 149 6.4.2. Germany’s Network Enforcement Act 150 6.4.3. Singapore: bill to fight misinformation 158 6.4.4. Russia: criminalisation of online content that ‘disrespects’ the government 159 Page 4 Freedom of expression and the internet 6.5. Powerful internet companies and national laws: who wins the battle for freedom of expression? 160 6.5.1. Google Italy: personalising (criminal) liability for online content 160 6.5.2. UK: publisher’s liability for Google confirmed 161 6.5.3. Social media platforms remove Chinese state-sponsored disinformation campaign targeting Hong Kong 162 6.6. Business and freedom of expression online 163 6.6.1. Tajikistan: no complicity of companies in censorship 163 6.6.2. EU: does the export of censorship and surveillance technology violate human rights? 164 CHAPTER 7. EUROPEAN MONITORING MECHANISMS 167 7.1. Council of Europe Internet Governance Strategy 167 7.2. Monitoring by Council of Europe bodies 168 7.2.1. The Committee of Ministers 168 7.2.2. The Parliamentary Assembly 169 7.2.3. The Secretary General 170 7.2.4. The Commissioner for Human Rights 171 7.2.5. The European Court of Human Rights 172 7.2.6. The Council of Europe’s other monitoring bodies 173 The European Committee on Social Rights 173 The Advisory Committee for the Protection of National Minorities 174 The European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) 175 7.2.7. Capacity-building 176 7.3. Monitoring by the OSCE and the EU 177 7.3.1. The OSCE 177 7.3.2. The EU 177 7.4. European hotlines 179 7.5. Civil society watchdogs 182 CHAPTER 8. PROMOTION OF FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION ONLINE 185 8.1. The Council of Europe 185 8.2. The European Union 188 8.3. The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) 190 8.4. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) 193 8.5. The UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression 195 8.6. Initiatives by individual states 196 CHAPTER 9.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (2014) 11:3 Scripted 329 BOOK REVIEW FREEDOM OF
    (2014) 11:3 SCRIPTed 329 BOOK REVIEW FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND THE INTERNET By Wolfgang Benedek and Matthias C Kettemann Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2013, 190pp. ISBN 978-92-871-7702-5 (pbk). €29.00. European discussions of internet regulation tend to be dominated by the European Union dimension. This is unsurprising, reflecting as it does the central role of the Electronic Commerce Directive, the extensive case law of the Court of Justice and the large sums which have been spent by the Commission in successive Safer Internet programmes. It does mean, however, that not enough attention has been paid to either the extensive work that has been done through the Council of Europe on protecting fundamental rights online nor to significant judgments of the European Court of Human Rights such as Ahmet Yildirim v. Turkey.1 This book partially remedies that gap in the literature. Although short by the standards of most legal texts (at 190 pages) it provides a solid overview of the issues surrounding freedom of expression online, with a particular focus on the Council of Europe and European Convention on Human Rights aspects. In addition, the book outlines the work of other international actors such as the EU, UNESCO, the OSCE and the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression, as well as the growing human rights work of civil society and private entities such as the Global Network Initiative. The book opens with an introduction, setting out the general aims and structure of the work and illustrating the general issues presented through the example of the Twitter Joke Trial.2 Chapter two then seeks to identify the content of the right to freedom of expression online.
    [Show full text]
  • Transnational Terrorism, Organized Crime and Peace-Building Human Security in the Western Balkans
    Transnational Terrorism, Organized Crime and Peace-Building Human Security in the Western Balkans Edited by Wolfgang Benedek, Christopher Daase, Vojin Dimitrijevic and Petrus van Duyne Transnational Terrorism, Organized Crime and Peace-Building Also by Wolfgang Benedek UNDERSTANDING HUMAN RIGHTS, MANUAL ON HUMAN RIGHTS EDUCATION (Edited) MAINSTREAMING HUMAN SECURITY: Policies, Problems, Potentials (Edited with Matthias C., Kettemann and Markus Möstl) ANTI-TERRORISTS MEASURES AND HUMAN RIGHTS (Edited with Alice Yotopoulous-Marangopoulous) Transnational Terrorism, Organized Crime and Peace-Building Human Security in the Western Balkans Edited by Wolfgang Benedek Christopher Daase Vojin Dimitrijevic´ and Petrus van Duyne Introduction, selection and editorial matters © Wolfgang Benedek, Christopher Daase, Vojin Dimitrijevic ´ and Petrus van Duyne 2010 Individual chapters © contributors 2010 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The authors have asserted their rights to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2010 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS.
    [Show full text]
  • European Future of the Balkans, Bilateral Seminar at the Austrian Embassy in Paris, February 7, 2012
    European Future of the Balkans, Bilateral Seminar at the Austrian Embassy in Paris, February 7, 2012 Some Reflections on Topic II – The Citizens’ Needs: Economy, Civil Society and Related Cooperation: Perspectives for Economic Development and Investment, Civil Society, Use and the Role of the Media, Scientific and Academic Cooperation by Wolfgang Benedek, Director of the Institute of International Public Law and International Relations and of the European Training and Research Center for Human Rights and Democracy at the University of Graz In my function as Chairman of the NGO “World University Service” (WUS Austria), which is committed to the right to education worldwide, but was particularly involved in the Western Balkans since 1992 (see www.wus-austria.org) I keep good memories from our cooperation with a French association and colleagues in Sarajevo during the war in 1994 and after, when we had a close cooperation with French universities like the University of Lyon in order to help with the reconstruction and rehabilitation of the system of higher education in Bosnia and Herzegovina and other war-effected countries of the region. One focus of WUS Austria is assisting “people”, the young generation neglected in their educational opportunities and needed so dearly for building the human capital necessary for the economic and political development of the countries of the Western Balkans (see, for example, Wolfgang Benedek (ed.), Impact of Higher Education and Human Capital on the Economic and Political Development in Kosovo, Der Donauraum (The Danube Region), 1/2010). Building the human infrastructure is necessary for a prosperous country and region.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Status of Kosovo: the Role of Human Rights and Minority Rights
    Chicago-Kent Law Review Volume 80 Issue 1 Symposium: Final Status for Kosovo: Article 10 Untying the Gordian Knot December 2004 Final Status of Kosovo: The Role of Human Rights and Minority Rights Wolfgang Benedek Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Wolfgang Benedek, Final Status of Kosovo: The Role of Human Rights and Minority Rights , 80 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 215 (2005). Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol80/iss1/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chicago-Kent Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. FINAL STATUS OF KOSOVO: THE ROLE OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND MINORITY RIGHTS WOLFGANG BENEDEK* INTRODUCTION After the experience of massive human rights violations in Kosovo, which led to a humanitarian intervention by NATO, it is crucial that the reconstruction of society in Kosovo is based on human and minority rights. Human rights and minority rights will play a major role in building the standards necessary for the final status of Kosovo. However, human rights and minority rights will also be of major importance after the final status has been determined, expectedly in favor of the independence of Kosovo. The Council of Europe, the European Union, and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe ("OSCE") define themselves as or- ganizations based on the rule of law, democracy, and human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • The Charter of Human Rights and Principles for the Internet Table of Contents Introduction 1
    Internet Rights & Principles Coalition the charter of human rights and principles for the internet Table of Contents Introduction 1 How to Get Involved 3 How the IRPC Charter 4 Came About 10 Rights & Principles 6 for the Internet Charter of Human Rights 8 & Principles for the Internet (Version 1.1) Appendices 28 © August 2014 – 4th Edition Internet Rights and Principles Dynamic Coalition UN Internet Governance Forum This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License Compiled and edited by Marianne Franklin, with Robert Bodle and Dixie Hawtin Design by Zeena Feldman Internet Rights & Principles Coalition 1 Introduction The Internet Rights & Principles Dynamic and other covenants that make up the Coalition is an international network of International Bill of Human Rights at the individuals and organizations working to United Nations (http://www.ohchr.org/ uphold human rights in the online environ- EN/Issues/Pages/WhatareHumanRights. ment and across the spectrum of internet aspx). It is the outcome of work from policy-making domains. It is based at the many people and organisations over UN Internet Governance Forum, an open the years and is growing in stature as “multistakeholder” forum for government, others start to apply its 23 clauses to business, and civil society groups to come specific situations. In 2011, the coalition together to discuss mutual points of con- launched the Ten Punchy Principles cern that fall under the rubric of internet (http://internetrightsandprinciples.org/ governance (http://www.intgovforum.org/ site/campaign), a distillation of ten key cms). values and principles underlying the Charter. This booklet contains both these Since 2008, the IRP Coalition has been documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing on Human Rights in the Western Balkans, with a Special
    Subcommittee on Human Rights In association with the Delegation for relations with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro and Kosovo in the presence of the Members of the EU-Montenegro Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary Committee Hearing on human rights in the Western Balkans, with a special focus on minorities chaired by Ms Barbara Lochbihler 29 November 2012 9.30 - 10.30 Room: Paul-Henri Spaak 4B001 European Parliament, Brussels Programme Introductory remarks: Ms Barbara Lochbihler, Chair of the Subcommittee on Human Rights Mr Jelko Kacin, Vice-Chair of the Delegation for relations with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro and Kosovo Mr Nebojša Kaluđerović, Minister of Foreign Affairs and European Integration of Montenegro The exchange of views can be followed online 1 http://www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/committees/homeCom.do?language=EN&body=DROI Presentation of a draft study: "Human rights mainstreaming in the EU enlargement process in the Western Balkans with special focus on minorities", by co-authors Prof Wolfgang Benedek, Director of the European Training and Research Centre for Human Rights and Democracy of the University of Graz, and Mag. Lisa HESCHL E.MA, European Training and Research Centre for Human Rights and Democracy of the University of Graz (Uni-ETC), and Prof Florian Bieber, Director of the Centre for Southeast European Studies (CSEES); Speech by Ambassador Janez Lenarčič, Director of the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights Ms. Dušica Puzić, Council of Europe Mr. Detlev Boeing, European Commission, DG Enlargement Debate with Members of the European Parliament and Members of the EU-Montenegro Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary Committee - with the participation of Mr Morten Kjaerum, Director of the Fundamental Rights Agency Conclusions by the Chair The exchange of views can be followed online 2 http://www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/committees/homeCom.do?language=EN&body=DROI .
    [Show full text]
  • Symposium on Role of Human Rights in Post-Conflict Situation in SEE
    O C C A S I O N A L P A P E R S E R I E S I S S U E N O . 7, June 2002 WOLFGANG BENEDEK/GUDRUN RABUSSAY SSYMPOSIUM ON RROLE OF HHUMAN RRIGHTS IN Post-Conflict Situation in SEE SUMMARY REPORT Schubertstrasse 29 8010 Graz Austria Tel +43 316 322 888 1 Fax +43 316 322 888 4 e-mail: office@etc - graz.at web: http://www.etc - graz.at Europäisches Trainings- und Forschungszentrum für Menschenrechte und Demokratie Schubertstraße 29, A-8010 Graz Direktoren: Tel. +43 (0)316 322 8881, Fax. +43 (0)316 322 8884 Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr. Wolfgang Benedek e-mail: [email protected] Ass. Prof. DDr. Renate Kicker website: http://www.etc-graz.at Univ.-Prof. Dr. Joseph Marko Symposium on Role of Human Rights in Post-Conflict Situation in SEE ETC, Graz, 14 June 2002 Summary report I. Introductory Presentations: A Framework of Analysis Prof. Dr. Karl Kaser – Recent Post-Conflict History of SEE of Relevance for Human Rights 1. Mr. KASER focuses on the Western Balkans, which consist of Southern Croatia, BiH, Albania, Kosovo, Macedonia and Western Bulgaria. He structures his presentation in three parts: customary law and human rights, constitutional stability and human rights and “the winner takes it all – strategy”. 2. In regard to the first point he explains that in the Western Balkans customary law was replaced by state law only in the second half of the 20th century. Therefore customary law with its patrilinear structures (kinship system) still plays a major role in the social order as well as in the political life of these countries.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of SARAJEVO – CENTER for INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES Page 1/4 Course Description
    SP2 Form UNIVERSITY OF SARAJEVO – CENTER FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES Page 1/4 Course Description Course name: International Mechanisms for Human Rights Protection and Course code: Implementation Study year: Cycle: II Semester: I ECTS: 5 2019/2020 Study mode: Obligatory Total hrs. number: 64 Lectures: 60 Field trip: 4 Laboratory/practical exercises: Prof. Wolfgang Benedek, University of Graz, Austria 12h Prof. Hans Joachim Heintze, University of Ruhr, Bochum, Germany 8h Prof. Iavor Rangelov, London School of Economics, Great Britain 8h Manfred Nowak, University of Vienna, Austria 8h Prof. Carmelo Danisi, Bologna University 8h Teaching participants Biljana Branković, GREVIO, Council of Europe 8h Guest Lecture: Prof. dr. Igor Milinković, Univerzitet Banja Luka 2h GC Exchange lecture: Veronica Gomez, LATMA, Global Campus, UNSAM, Buenos Aires; Argentina, 6h Enrolment None preconditions: The objective of the Cluster is to provide students with a better understanding of the implementation and enforcement of human rights at different levels in practice. As different systems are compared, they can also better understand the interrelationship between the different levels of human rights protection. Furthermore, students should become capable of advising how best to use the variety of human rights instruments in Course goal(s): particular cases. They should be able to link what they learned in previous clusters with the aspect of implementation and enforcement. Students, who are often concerned about how to translate the knowledge gained in several clusters into practice, in this part as the final part of the teaching programme should gain an understanding of the manifold ways of implementation of human rights, but also the obstacles and restrictions which might have to be faced in this context.
    [Show full text]
  • Mainstreaming Human and Minority Rights in the Eu Enlargement with the Western Balkans
    DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES OF THE UNION DIRECTORATE B POLICY DEPARTMENT STUDY MAINSTREAMING HUMAN AND MINORITY RIGHTS IN THE EU ENLARGEMENT WITH THE WESTERN BALKANS Abstract With the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty the protection of minorities became an explicit founding value of the European Union. In its external relations the EU has with the membership perspective and increased integration in the common market strong instruments at her disposal to promote and foster the protection of human and minority rights in the Western Balkan states. The question, however, arises to which extent the EU made and makes use of this leverage in its enlargement policy. The study investigates whether the EU`s own commitments with regard to the protection of minorities became an integral part of the enlargement process with the Western Balkan states. It gives an overview of the situation of minorities in the states of the Western Balkan, explores the minority rights frameworks in place and how they have been implemented so far. It reviews the EU's record of monitoring and mainstreaming rights of persons belonging to minorities in the enlargement process and examines current policy and financial instruments available in enlargement and neighbourhood policies in this regard. Since there are various actors involved in the protection of minorities at the regional level cooperation with the OSCE and the CoE will be explored and analysed how regional cooperation in the field of minority protection is already developed. In concluding, recommendations will be made on how to improve EU and European Parliament’s action in the field of minority protection EXPO/B/DROI/2012/10 December 2012 PE 457.114 EN Policy Department DG External Policies This study was requested by the European Parliament's Subcommittee on Human Rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights in the Western Balkans, with a Special Focus On
    Subcommittee on Human Rights In association with the Delegation for relations with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro and Kosovo in the presence of the Members of the EU-Montenegro Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary Committee Hearing on human rights in the Western Balkans, with a special focus on minorities chaired by Ms Barbara Lochbihler 29 November 2012 9.30 - 10.30 Room: Paul-Henri Spaak 4B001 European Parliament, Brussels Draft Programme Introductory remarks: Ms Barbara Lochbihler, Chair of the Subcommittee on Human Rights Mr Jelko Kacin, Vice-Chair of the Delegation for relations with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro and Kosovo Mr Nebojša Kaluđerović, Minister of Foreign Affairs and European Integration of Montenegro The exchange of views can be followed online 1 http://www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/committees/homeCom.do?language=EN&body=DROI Presentation of a draft study: "Human rights mainstreaming in the EU enlargement process in the Western Balkans with special focus on minorities", by co-authors Prof Wolfgang Benedek, Director of the European Training and Research Centre for Human Rights and Democracy of the University of Graz, and Mag. Lisa HESCHL E.MA, European Training and Research Centre for Human Rights and Democracy of the University of Graz (Uni-ETC), and Prof Florian Bieber, Director of the Centre for Southeast European Studies (CSEES); Speech by Ambassador Janez Lenarčič, Director of the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights Ms. Dušica Puzić, Council of Europe Mr. Detlev Boeing, European Commission, DG Enlargement Debate with Members of the European Parliament and Members of the EU-Montenegro Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary Committee - with the participation of Mr Morten Kjaerum, Director of the Fundamental Rights Agency Conclusions by the Chair The exchange of views can be followed online 2 http://www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/committees/homeCom.do?language=EN&body=DROI.
    [Show full text]
  • CV Benedek Englisch
    Europass curriculum vitae Personal information Surname(s) / First name(s) Benedek / Wolfgang Address(es) Institute for International Law and International Relations, University of Graz, Universitätsstraße 15/A/4, A-8010 Graz, Austria Telephone( s) 0043/ 316/3 80/3411 0664/392 00 59 Fax(es) 0043/316/380/9455 E-mail(s) wolfgang.benedek@uni -graz.at Nationality( -ies) Austria Date of birth 14.02.1951 Gender Male Work experience Dates 19 74 -present Occupation or position held Universit y Assistant, from 1990 Associate professor, from 1998 Extra -ordinary Professor, from 2003 Full Professor and Head of Institute of International Law and International Relations Main activities and responsibilities Lecturer in the field of international la w (specializing on Southeast -Europe and Africa ), implementation of international human rights on the local and regional level, human security, Internet Governance, Human Rights and Information Society, Human Rights and EU, Human Rights and Terrorism, refugees and migration, GATT and WTO, EU in WTO Name and address of employer University of Graz , Universitätstraße 15/A/4, A -8010 Graz Type of business or sector Academic institution s Dates 1999 -20 10; Occupation or position held Director of the Euro pean Training and Research Centre for Human Rights and Democracy in Graz (ETC); since 2009 Director of the ETC of the University of Graz (UNI-ETC) Main activities and responsibilities Name and address of employer University of Graz , Universitätsplatz 3, A-8010 Graz Type of business or sector Dates 2001 -2011
    [Show full text]
  • Belarus at a Crossroads
    Security and Human Rights (2020) 1-22 Belarus at a Crossroads Vahram Abadjian Independent International Affairs Analyst, Vienna, Austria [email protected] Abstract The article analyses the critical aspects of recent developments in Belarus and the deeply rooted causes that led to the current unprecedented political crisis. It gives a thorough consideration to the negative aspects of non-observation by the osce/odihr of the 9 August presidential election. Furthermore, the article examines the preconditions of a national dialogue, and suggests an agenda and a roadmap as a way out of the crisis, placing a special emphasis on the osce’s possible mediation role. In conclusion, the article comes up with the idea of Belarus’s neutral status as a legal and political framework to guarantee the country’s stability and democratic progress. Keywords democratic transition – elections – national dialogue – Constituent Assembly – osce – mediation agenda – geopolitics – neutral status Introduction The 9 August 2020 presidential election in Belarus and the following events brought the country into the limelight of news coverage all over the world. They raised a huge wave of innumerable comments by political analysts and pundits, statements by parliamentarians and government officials, intensive consultations and meetings up to the level of heads of state and government, public discussions and rallies of solidarity in numerous countries. This unprecedented attention was triggered by, undoubtedly, the most acute political crisis that Belarus has been witnessing since 1994, the year, when Aleksandr Lukashenko was elected as president for the first time. Although © Vahram Abadjian, 2020 | doi:10.1163/18750230-03101002 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the cc by-ncDownloaded 4.0 license.
    [Show full text]