DOCSLIB.ORG

DODIG-2013-131 Army Requirement to Acquire Individual Carbine Not Justified

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Report No. DODIG-2013-131 U.S. Department of Defense InspectorSEPTEMBER 16, 2013 General Army Requirement To Acquire Individual Carbine Not Justified INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY EXCELLENCE INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY EXCELLENCE Mission Our mission is to provide independent, relevant, and timely oversight of the Department of Defense that: supports the warfighter; promotes accountability, integrity, and efficiency; advises the Secretary of Defense and Congress; and informs the public. Vision Our vision is to be a model oversight organization in the federal government by leading change, speaking truth, and promoting excellence; a diverse organization, working together as one professional team, recognized as leaders in our field. Fraud, Waste and Abuse HOTLINE 1.800.424.9098 • www.dodig.mil/hotline For more information about whistleblower protection, please see the inside back cover. Army Requirement To Acquire Individual Carbine NotResults Justified in Brief September 16, 2013 Finding Continued Objective Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) that detailed our concerns with IC product office officials obligating $420,000 We initiated this audit to determine whether to award contracts to initiate the Phase III of the IC source the Army justified its competition to acquire selection process. a new Individual Carbine (IC) weapon and whether the Army was implementing an On March 29, 2013, the Assistant Secretary responded to our effective acquisition strategy. memorandum. The Assistant Secretary stated that the Army Finding appreciated the opportunity to respond; however, while the Army was assessing the DoD IG findings, the integrity and sensitive nature of the IC source selection process did not allow the Army The Army Deputy Chief of Staff, G-3/5/7, did to address our findings in its response. The Assistant Secretary not justify the requirement for a new carbine. further stated the Army would not award Phase III contracts This occurred because the Army Deputy Chief until it adequately addressed our findings. of Staff, G-3/5/7, did not follow the Small Recommendations Arms Capabilities Based Assessment findings and recommendations, and inappropriately approved and validated the requirements The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and document used to support the establishment Technology) should terminate the Individual Carbine competition of the individual carbine program. As a and eliminate funding the Individual Carbine program. Also, the result, the Army wasted about $14 million on Army Deputy Chief of Staff, G-3/5/7, should validate the quantity a competition to identify a source to supply of M4 carbines needed. If the Army concludes that additional new carbines it does not need. In addition, M4 carbines are needed, then the Army should hold a the Army plans to spend $2.52 billion over a competition to acquire them. Furthermore, the Assistant Secretary 20-year life cycle to procure and maintain of the Army (Financial Management and Comptroller) should 501,289 carbines that its own analysis reprogram the $382 million in procurement and research, suggests can be delayed for another 10 years development, test, and evaluation funding currently allocated with no impact on readiness. to acquire carbines across the FY 2013 to FY 2018 Future Years Defense Program, adjusted by validated M4 carbines needed. We identified potential monetary benefits Comments of $2.52 billion, $382 million of funds to put to better use ($375 million in procurement funding and $7 million in research, Although the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Financial development, test, and evaluation funding) Management and Comptroller), the Assistant Secretary of the and $2.14 billion in cost avoidance after Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology), and the Army FY 2018 if the program is terminated. Deputy Chief of Staff, G 3/5/7, did not state whether they agreed or disagreed with our recommendations, their responses met On December 28, 2012, we issued a quick reaction the intent of our recommendations. memorandum to the Assistant Secretary of the Visit us on the web at www.dodig.mil i DODIG-2013-131 (Project No. D2012-D000AE-0196.000) │ Recommendations Table Recommendations No Additional Management Requiring Comment Comments Required Assistant Secretary of the Army (Financial Management and Comptroller) 3 Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) 1 Army Deputy Chief of Staff, G-3/5/7 2 ii │ DODIG-2013-131 (Project No. D2012-D000AE-0196.000) INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 4800 MARK CENTER DRIVE ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA 22350-1500 September 16, 2013 MEMORANDUM FOR THE AUDITOR GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SUBJECT: Army Requirement To Acquire Individual Carbine Not Justified (Report No. DODIG-2013-131) We are providing this report for your information and use. We determined the Army did not justify the need for a new carbine, and as a result, wasted about $14 million on a competition to identify a source to supply new carbines it does not need. In addition, the Army plans to spend $2.52 billion over a 20-year life cycle to procure and maintain 501,289 carbines that its own analysis states can be delayed for another 10 years with no impact to readiness. During the audit we identified potential monetary benefits of $2.52 billion, $382 million of funds to put to better use and $2.14 billion in cost avoidance after FY 2018 if the program is terminated. We considered management comments on a draft of this report when preparing the final report. Comments from the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Financial Management and Comptroller), the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology), and the Army Deputy Chief of Staff, G-3/5/7, conformed to the requirements of DoD Directive 7650.3; therefore, we do not require additional comments. We appreciate the courtesies extended to the staff. Please direct questions to me at (703) 604-8905 (DSN 664-8905). Amy J. Frontz Principal Assistant Inspector General for Auditing iii DODIG-2013-131 │ Contents Introduction Objective _________________________________________________________________________________________1 Background ______________________________________________________________________________________1 Army Previously Concluded That the Introduction of New Carbine Without Significantly Improved Performance Was Unacceptable ___________________________________________________1 Army Executes Dual Path Strategy for Next Generation of Army Service Rifles ____________2 Program Management __________________________________________________________________________4 Finding.Review of Internal Army Controls Strategy ____________________________________________________________________ To Acquire 5 Individual Carbines Not Supported ____________________________________6 Policy on Identifying and Validating Capability Requirements ______________________________6 Small Arms Capabilities Based Assessment Did Not Identify the Need for a New Carbine ____________________________________________________________________7 Army Inappropriately Approved and Validated the Individual Carbine Capability Development Document ___________________________________________________________8 Army Initiated Program To Acquire an Improved Carbine That Was Not Needed _______ 10 Army Organizations Recommend Suspending the Individual Carbine Competition and Source Selection Efforts __________________________________________________ 11 Conclusion _____________________________________________________________________________________ 14 AppendixesRecommendations, Management Comments, and Our Response _________________________ 15 Appendix A. Scope and Methodology ______________________________________________________ 18 Prior Coverage on Individual Carbine ____________________________________________________ 19 Appendix B. M16 Rifle and M4 Carbine Family of Weapons ______________________________ 20 Appendix C. Timeline of Key Events ________________________________________________________ 22 Appendix D. Chronology, Key Events, and Activities _______________________________________ 23 Appendix E. Quick Reaction Memorandum and Response ________________________________ 25 Appendix F. Summary of Potential Monetary Benefits ____________________________________ 32 iv │ DODIG-2013-131 Contents (cont’d) Management Comments Assistant Secretary of the Army (Financial Management and Comptroller) Comments ______________________________________________________________________ 33 Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) Comments ______________________________________________________________________ 34 AcronymsArmy Deputy Chief and of Staff, Abbreviations G-3/5/7, Comments ___________________________________________ 35 _____________________________________________ 36 v DODIG-2013-131 │ Introduction Introduction Objective The audit objective was to evaluate the Army’s requirements and acquisition strategy for improving the Individual Carbine (IC) weapon. Specifically, the audit evaluated whether the Army justified its competition to acquire a new IC weapon and whether the Army was implementing an effective acquisition strategy. See Appendix A for a discussion of the audit scope and methodology and prior coverage. Background The IC program is an Acquisition Category II major system program that entered the Engineering and Manufacturing Development phase of the acquisition process on April 7, 2011. The IC program was designated as an Army
Recommended publications
  • The Army's M-4 Carbine: Background and Issues for Congress

    The Army's M-4 Carbine: Background and Issues for Congress

    The Army’s M-4 Carbine: Background and Issues for Congress Andrew Feickert Specialist in Military Ground Forces June 8, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS22888 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress The Army’s M-4 Carbine: Background and Issues for Congress Summary The M-4 carbine is the Army’s primary individual combat weapon for infantry units. While there have been concerns raised by some about the M-4’s reliability and lethality, some studies suggest that the M-4 is performing well and is viewed favorably by users. The Army is undertaking both the M4 Carbine Improvement Program and the Individual Carbine Competition, the former to identify ways to improve the current weapon, and the latter to conduct an open competition among small arms manufacturers for a follow-on weapon. An integrated product team comprising representatives from the Infantry Center; the Armament, Research, Development, and Engineering Center; the Program Executive Office Soldier; and each of the armed services will assess proposed improvements to the M4. The proposal for the industry-wide competition is currently before the Joint Requirements Oversight Council, and with the anticipated approval, solicitation for industry submissions could begin this fall. It is expected, however, that a selection for a follow-on weapon will not occur before FY2013, and that fielding of a new weapon would take an additional three to four years. This report will be updated as events warrant. Congressional Research Service The
  • Commonality in Military Equipment

    Commonality in Military Equipment

    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available CHILD POLICY from www.rand.org as a public service of CIVIL JUSTICE the RAND Corporation. EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit NATIONAL SECURITY research organization providing POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY objective analysis and effective SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY solutions that address the challenges SUBSTANCE ABUSE facing the public and private sectors TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY around the world. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND Arroyo Center View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Commonality in Military Equipment A Framework to Improve Acquisition Decisions Thomas Held, Bruce Newsome, Matthew W.
  • Firearms Training Guide

    Firearms Training Guide

    Firearms A Training Guide For Law Enforcement Officers Wisconsin Department of Justice Law Enforcement Standards Board June 2017 The Law Enforcement Standards Board approved this textbook on June 6, 2017. Training Academy effective date is January 1, 2018. All law enforcement basic preparatory training courses that begin on or after January 1st, 2018, must incorporate this updated textbook and any related updates to the curriculum. Academies beginning before that date may elect to use these updated materials. Copyright © 2017 by the Department of Justice. All rights reserved. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people contributed to the writing of this manual. The Wisconsin Department of Justice Training and Standards Bureau gratefully acknowledges the hard work and dedication of the Tactical Skills Advisory Committee, which suggested and reviewed content for the present guide. The current members of the Committee are: Designated Representatives and Practitioners: Glenn Rehberg, Training & Standards Bureau, Chair Stephanie Pederson, Training & Standards Bureau Bradley Hardel, Sheriff’s Representative Russell Jack, Chief’s Representative Andrew Kleppe, Wisconsin Technical College System Kris Perales, Wisconsin State Patrol Justin Sebestyen/James MacGillis/Al Groszczyk/Aimee Obregon, Milwaukee PD Dennis Konkel/Sarah Wronski, Milwaukee County Sheriff’s Office Kimba Tieu/Chris Masterson, Madison Police Department Dennis Angle, Waukesha Police Department Mark Bauman, Eau Claire County Sheriff’s Office Steve Harlow, Milwaukee Area Technical College Mike
  • Federal Court Between

    Federal Court Between

    Court File No. T-735-20 FEDERAL COURT BETWEEN: CHRISTINE GENEROUX JOHN PEROCCHIO, and VINCENT R. R. PEROCCHIO Applicants and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent AFFIDAVIT OF MURRAY SMITH Table of Contents A. Background 3 B. The Firearms Reference Table 5 The Canadian Firearms Program (CFP): 5 The Specialized Firearms Support Services (SFSS): 5 The Firearms Reference Table (FRT): 5 Updates to the FRT in light of the Regulation 6 Notice to the public about the Regulation 7 C. Variants 8 The Nine Families 8 Variants 9 D. Bore diameter and muzzle energy limit 12 Measurement of bore diameter: 12 The parts of a firearm 13 The measurement of bore diameter for shotguns 15 The measurement of bore diameter for rifles 19 Muzzle Energy 21 E. Non-prohibited firearms currently available for hunting and shooting 25 Hunting 25 Sport shooting 27 F. Examples of firearms used in mass shooting events in Canada that are prohibited by the Regulation 29 2 I, Murray Smith, of Ottawa, Ontario, do affirm THAT: A. Background 1. I am a forensic scientist with 42 years of experience in relation to firearms. 2. I was employed by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (“RCMP”) during the period of 1977 to 2020. I held many positions during that time, including the following: a. from 1989 to 2002,1 held the position of Chief Scientist responsible for the technical policy and quality assurance of the RCMP forensic firearms service, and the provision of technical advice to the government and police policy centres on firearms and other weapons; and b.
  • Small Arms-Individual Weapons

    Small Arms-Individual Weapons

    290 Small Arms–Individual Weapons INVESTMENT COMPONENT Modernization thousand M14 EBRs were assembled be mounted on the shotgun. The bolt • 1QFY09: Materiel release and full- at TACOM Lifecycle Management handle is mountable on either side for rate production decision Recapitalization Command at Rock Island Arsenal in ambidextrous handling. • 3QFY09: First unit equipped response to Operational Need Statements M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun Maintenance requesting a longer range capability. The MASS enables Soldiers to transition System: The upgraded weapons are currently in between lethal and less-than-lethal fires • 4QFY09: Limited user test and MISSION service with select Army units. and adds the capability of a separate evaluation with MP units Enables warfighters and small units to shotgun without carrying a second • 2QFY10: Low-rate initial production engage targets with lethal fire to defeat The M320 Grenade Launcher is the weapon. Additional features include a approved or deter adversaries. replacement to all M203 series grenade box magazine, flip-up sights, and an • 4QFY10: First article testing launchers on M16 Rifles and M4 extendable stand-off device for door complete DESCRIPTION Carbines. A modular system, it attaches breaching. The M4 Carbine replaces the M16 series under the barrel of the rifle or carbine PROJECTED ACTIVITIES Rifles in all Brigade Combat Teams, and can convert to a stand-alone weapon. SYSTEM INTERDEPENDENCIES M4 Carbine: Division Headquarters, and other The M320 improves on current grenade None • Continue: M4 production, deliveries, selected units. It is 1.4 pounds lighter launchers with an integral day/night and fielding and more portable than the M16 series of sighting system and improved safety PROGRAM STATUS M14 EBR: rifles.
  • Adcor and the Demise of the Improved Carbine Competition

    Adcor and the Demise of the Improved Carbine Competition

    Adcor and the Demise of the Improved Carbine Competition 5/09/13 | by Max Slowik After five years of trials, the U.S. Army announced plans to cancel the Improved Carbine Competition on the heels of the end of its second phase. The competition would evaluate a handful of rifles that were in contention to replace the M4; the Colt ACC-M (sometimes called the ACM), the FN FNAC, the Heckler & Koch HK416, the Remington ACR and one by the upstart rifle manufacturer Adcor Defense, the BEAR Elite. In an attempt to tighten their budget, the Army has made the decision to halt the competition, saving them as much as $300 million from now through 2018. Right of the bat the Army will save $49 million in 2014, the first year of individual carbine field testing. The Army originally planned to put 30,000 rifles into service for further evaluation. Of the five rifles that were selected for phase II of the trials, three were to be put to the test in phase III. The Army is cancelling the competition before announcing which three rifles would make it to the final stage of testing, six weeks after the Inspector General audited the program. As the Army is currently in phase I of the M4 Product Improvement Program, upgrading their current M4s to M4A1s and exploring options for phase II, replacing the standard carbine handguard with a free-floating quad rail, the auditors decided that the Army doesn’t need a new rifle to replace the current crop of M4s. Phase III of the competition would have determined if these newer rifles would outperform the M4 in terms of reliability, accuracy and barrel life.
  • Police Department Item Quantity Barrington Police Department

    Police Department Item Quantity Barrington Police Department

    Police Department Item Quantity Barrington Police Department M16A1 Rifle 5 M16 Rifle 5 M14 Rifle 3 Rear Sight 3 Binoculars 5 Telescope 4 Sight Mounts 5 Utility Truck 2 Brushguard Kit 2 Air HM1 Filter 3 Spectacles Set, Ball 25 Burrillville M16A1 Rifle 2 M14 Rifle 3 Infrared Viewer 1 NVS Ranger M995sight 2 Charlestown M16A1 Rifle 2 M14 Rifle 3 Utility Truck 1 Coventry M16A1 Rifle 8 M14 Rifle 4 Bolt Carrier 5 Gun Cover 6 Magazine Cartridge 432 Bipod HK33 Rifle 8 Adaptor Rail Knights Armor MT 40 Barrel Assembly 12 Cartridge Receiver 21 Flash Suppressor 30 Gun Silencer Cover 6 Suppressor Small Arms Weapon 44 Carrier Assembly Kits 12 Rail Adaptor Weapon 12 5.56 MM Rifle Conversion Kit 12 Upper Receiver 12 Upper Reciever & Barrel Assembly 12 Folding Bipods 20 Carbine Grip 24 Mount Site Small Arms 6 Mod Kit Carbine 5 Trigger Assembly 10 Bolt Assembly 8 Tube Shotgun Magazine 12 Heat Shield Assembly 12 M84 Charging Handle 44 Magazine Release 24 Adaptor Rail Weapon 52 Tactical Tripod Kit 7 Gun Mount 6 Gun Silencer 10 Sight Holo 16 Night Scope 3 Night Vision Scope 15 Upper Telescope 1 Reflex Sight 51 Telescope Straight 3 Scope Assembly 2 Articulated Telescope 6 Laser Sight Surefire 7 M14 Mount Assembly 4 Marcbot Robot 1 Utility Truck 3 Vehicular Radiator Shield 1 Armor Radiator Plate 2 Vehicular Door 17 Vehicular Body Panel 11 Vehicular Window 7 Vehicular Windshield 4 Full Armor MAK Kit 1 LH Undercarriage 1 RH Undercarriage 1 4 Door MAK Armor HMMWV 1 4 Door Assembly Kit 1 Windshield Parts Kit 1 Frag2 Parts Kit 1 EAP Frag Kit 1,2,5 1 Supplemental
  • USA M14 Rifle

    USA M14 Rifle

    USA M14 Rifle The M14 rifle, officially the United States Rifle, Caliber 7.62 mm, M14, is an American select-fire battle rifle that fires 7.62×51mm NATO (.308 in) ammunition. It became the standard-issue rifle for the U.S. military in 1959 replacing the M1 Garand rifle in the U.S. Army by 1958 and the U.S. Marine Corps by 1965 until being replaced by the M16 rifle beginning in 1968. The M14 was used by U.S. Army, Navy, and Marine Corps for basic and advanced individual training (AIT) from the mid-1960s to the early 1970s. The M14 was developed from a long line of experimental weapons based upon the M1 Garand rifle. Although the M1 was among the most advanced infantry rifles of the late 1930s, it was not an ideal weapon. Modifications were already beginning to be made to the basic M1 rifle's design during the last months of World War II. Changes included adding fully automatic firing capability and replacing the eight-round en bloc clips with a detachable box magazine holding 20 rounds. Winchester, Remington, and Springfield Armory's own John Garand offered different conversions. Garand's design, the T20, was the most popular, and T20 prototypes served as the basis for a number of Springfield test rifles from 1945 through the early 1950s Production contracts Initial production contracts for the M14 were awarded to the Springfield Armory, Winchester, and Harrington & Richardson. Thompson-Ramo-Wooldridge Inc. (TRW) would later be awarded a production contract for the rifle as well.
  • PM Crew Served Weapons Overview Small Arms Symposium & Exhibition

    PM Crew Served Weapons Overview Small Arms Symposium & Exhibition

    TheThe Soldier:Soldier: America’sAmerica’s MostMost DeployedDeployed CombatCombat SystemSystem PM Crew Served Weapons Overview for the Small Arms Symposium & Exhibition National Defense Industrial Association 16-19 May 2006 BG James R. Moran COL Carl A. Lipsit Mr. Peter Errante Program Executive Officer Soldier PM Soldier Weapons Deputy PM Crew Served Weapons Crew Served Weapons 2 PM Soldier Weapons Programs List DEVELOPMENT WEAPONS PROCUREMENT Objective Individual Combat Weapon (OICW) 37. M101, CROWS, Remote Mount 1. OICW Increment I 38. M151E1 & M151E2 Protector Remote Wpn System (RWS) 2. OICW Increment II - XM25 Air Burst Weapon 39. MK19 Advanced Crew Served Weapons (ACSW) 40. Mod Kit 3. Advanced Crew Served Weapon (ACSW) Programs 41. Lightweight Adjustable Sight Bracket 42. Tactical Engagement Simulator (TES) SOLDIER ENHANCEMENT PROGRAMS 43. M107 Semi Automatic Long Range Sniper Rifle 4. XM26 - 12 Gauge Modular Accessory Shotgun System 44. M240B, 7.62mm Medium MG (MASS) 45. M240B Collapsible Buttstock 5. Joint Combat Pistol 46. M192, Light Weight Ground Mount For MG 6. Family of Small Arms Suppressors 47. Improved Bipod 7. M68 Close Combat Optics (Dual Source Qualification) 48. Improved Flash Suppressor 8. XM1068, 12 Gauge Non-Lethal Extended Range Round 49. Combat Ammunition Pack 9. XM1022, Sniper Ammunition for M107 50. M240B Short Barrel 10. XM110 - 7.62 Semi-Automatic Sniper System (SASS) 51. M240B Improved Buttstock 11. Close Quarters Battle Kit 52. Sling Assembly for the M240B 12. XM1041/XM1042/XM1071 - Close Combat Mission 53. Short Barrel Capability Kit 54. M249, 5.56mm Squad Automatic Weapon 13. Advanced Sniper Accessory Kit (ASAK) 55. M192, Lightweight Ground Mount For MG 14.
  • U.S. Army Board Study Guide Version 5.3 – 02 June, 2008

    U.S. Army Board Study Guide Version 5.3 – 02 June, 2008

    U.S. Army Board Study Guide Version 5.3 – 02 June, 2008 Prepared by ArmyStudyGuide.com "Soldiers helping Soldiers since 1999" Check for updates at: http://www.ArmyStudyGuide.com Sponsored by: Your Future. Your Terms. You’ve served your country, now let DeVry University serve you. Whether you want to build off of the skills you honed in the military, or launch a new career completely, DeVry’s accelerated, year-round programs can help you make school a reality. Flexible, online programs plus more than 80 campus locations nationwide make studying more manageable, even while you serve. You may even be eligible for tuition assistance or other military benefits. Learn more today. Degree Programs Accounting, Business Administration Computer Information Systems Electronics Engineering Technology Plus Many More... Visit www.DeVry.edu today! Or call 877-496-9050 *DeVry University is accredited by The Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association, www.ncahlc.org. Keller Graduate School of Management is included in this accreditation. Program availability varies by location Financial Assistance is available to those who qualify. In New York, DeVry University and its Keller Graduate School of Management operate as DeVry College of New York © 2008 DeVry University. All rights reserved U.S. Army Board Study Guide Table of Contents Army Programs ............................................................................................................................................. 5 ASAP - Army Substance Abuse Program...............................................................................................
  • Download the May 2020 Newsletter Here

    Download the May 2020 Newsletter Here

    MAY 2020 VOL 87 President’s Message Chapter 16 Newsleer Organizaon and Responsibilies: Editor: Glen Craig Secons: Message from the President: Stephen Durfee Treasurers Report: Willi Lindner Sec. Rpt (Staff Meeng Minutes): Mike Barkstrom Sick Call/Obituary: Chaplain Butch Hall Blast from the Past: Glen Craig Special Recognion: Mike Barkstrom Upcoming Events: Mike Barkstrom Calendar: Stephen Durfee Human Interest Story: Chapter at large SFA Naonal HQ Update: Stephen Durfee Aer Acon Report: Stephen Durfee Membership Info: Roy Sayer Adversements: Glen Craig A wise and frugal government, which shall restrain men from injuring one Suspense: another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of st industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the Newsleer published (Web): 1 of each bread it has earned. – Thomas Jefferson odd numbered month Respecully, (Special Forces Associaon Chapter XVI President) th Stephen P. Durfee (DOL) Booz, Allen, Hamilton Inc. Input due to editor: 20 of each Strategic and Operaonal Exercise Planner, Mid [email protected] even numbered month Personal Cell: 208‐530‐5472 Dra due to President: 30th of each Pastor Butch’s Corner even numbered month th Powerful stories, to be so short. Final Dra due 30 of each These twelve short stories are all very good stories and make us think even numbered month twice about the daily happenings in our lives as we deal with others!! 1. I asked my grandmother to define success in her own words, she said; "Success is when you look back at your life and the memories make you smile." 2.
  • U.S. Army Weapon Systems Handbook 2012

    U.S. Army Weapon Systems Handbook 2012

    296 Small Caliber Ammunition INVESTMENT COMPONENT Modernization MISSION Training Unique Ammunition is designed Provides Warfighters with the highest specifically for use in training and is not for Recapitalization quality, most capable small caliber combat use, i.e., blank, dummy, inert, and Maintenance ammunition for training and combat. short-range training ammunition. DESCRIPTION SYSTEM INTERDEPENDENCIES Small Caliber Ammunition consists None of 5.56mm, 7.62mm, 9mm, 10- and 12-gauge, .22 Cal., .30 Cal., .50 Cal., and PROGRAM STATUS Grenade Rifle Entry Munition (GREM). • Current: M855A1 Enhanced The 5.56mm cartridge is used by the Performance Round (M855 M16 Rifle, M249 Squad Automatic replacement program) in Weapon (SAW), and the M4 Carbine. full production The 7.62mm cartridge is used by the M240 Machine Gun and M60 Machine PROJECTED ACTIVITIES Gun, as well as the M24, M110, and M14 • FY11: Produce and deliver one EBR Sniper Rifles. The 9mm cartridge is billion rounds (5.56mm, 7.62mm, fired by the M9 Pistol. The M2 Machine and 0.50 Cal.) Gun and the M107 Sniper Rifle use .50 • FY12: Complete Lake City Cal. cartridges. The remaining Small Army Ammunition Plant Caliber Ammunition is used in a variety modernization program of pistols, rifles, and shotguns. Three categories of Small Caliber Ammunition are currently in use. War Reserve Ammo is modern ammunition that supports individual and crew served weapons during combat operations. Training Standard Ammunition is dual-purpose, and it is used to support training or operational requirements. ACQUISITION PHASE Technology Development Engineering and Manufacturing Development Production and Deployment Operations and Support UNITED STATES ARMY 297 Small Caliber Ammunition FOREIGN MILITARY SALES 5.56mm, 7.62mm, .50 Caliber: Afghanistan, Colombia, Czech Republic, El Salvador, France, Hungary, India, Iraq, Israel, Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Lebanon, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Tunisia, Yemen CONTRACTORS Alliant Techsystems (Independence, MO) General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems (St.