Youth Attack Records releases download torrents Brutal Attack - Discography (1982 - 2021) 01. I got the Power 02. Red storm rising 03. Now I'm all alone 04. European Unity 05. As the drum beats 06. Through the darkness 07. Rockin' for R'n'R 08. Live long enough to die 09. Unity of mind and fist 10. We won't run 11. R.A.C. 12. Alright now. password: 88nsm. Label: Brutal Attack Records Size: 83 mb Format: 320 kbps Scans: no. 01. Roll the loosing Dice 02. The panther stalks the bear 03. Freedom fighter 04. Allright now 05. End 06. Think again 07. Free from the grave 08. Under one flag 09. Rock n Roll 10. We're for real. password: 88nsm. Label: Rebel Records Size: 20 mb Format: 320 kbps Scans: yes. Dead Kill Skate. This masterpiece is released on Youth Attack records! Rawish hardcore from the top shelf! Be sure to check it out. Vile gash is: Andrew Hinton, Benjamin Holesapple, Christian Weiland, Dennis Berendt. Released on Youth Attack records (YA69) Deluded Nothing Left Every Day. Facedown - Friendship still is everything EP (1997) 7" released in 1997 on Genet Records! Devoted to Innocence The Only One No Place Left (live) Devoted to Innocence (live) donderdag 13 oktober 2011. Betercore - Youthcrust Discography. Betercore existed as a youthcrustcore band, who started in Amsterdam, from 1997 until the winter of 2003. Betercore-core: Reinco Minogue: Vocals Beterkid: Guitars Wouter: Bassguitar Geert-Jan: Guitars/Drums. Betercore-corecrew: Billi: Vocals (2000-2003) Sanne: Vocals (2003-2004) Rogier: Drums (2001) John: Drums (1998-2000) (info taken from Last.fm) Straight Edge, But Not An Asshole! Multi Dood Ko-Operatie Invest! Read Between The Li(n)es Betercore Vs. Right Wing Jock Where Do I Fit In? DIY Man You Suck Punk Is Verzet! Fuck Your Pride Soymilk! Freedom Count Us Out Pro Choice Hooded Sweater Stand Up & Speak Vlees Is Vies Consequences Education PVVDA Bill Gates Society Reclaim The Crown Wa Marchiert Geen Woning, Geen Koning NSB Gospelcore 50% Vol AOV Practice What You Preach Punk Is Resistance Count Us Out. woensdag 12 oktober 2011. Cult Ritual - Self Titled LP. Cult Ritual was formed 2006 in Tampa Floriday. This is crazy mysterious chaotic hardcore! If you are into fast hardcore, power violence, you'll dig this. They called it quits in 2009. Zack Arrington - Bass Dan Rossiter - Vocals Dave Vassalotti - Guitar Tommy Conte - Drums. Holidays Horror Sale Ugly Years Nailed Failed Saturday's Blood Last Time Cancer Money. vrijdag 7 oktober 2011. Bucket Full of teeth - I 7" Bucket full of teeth is a band formed by 2 former members of orchid. They started as playing plain power violence, but later on they putted more influences into their songs. They released 4 7"s, first 3 on Youth Attack! records and last one on Level plane records. Brad Wallace Will Killingsworth. donderdag 6 oktober 2011. Neanderthal - Kill, eat and breed 7" Neanderthal is a band formed in California. They are a 90's power violence band. Later on they formed Man is the bastard. Neanderthal - Kill, eat and breed 7" was released in 1991. Negative FX - self titled LP. Negative FX was a straight edge hardcore band from Boston. They formed in 1981 and only played five shows. Negative FX was a part of the Boston straight edge crew with other bands like DYS and SS Decontrol. DEMOlition, Man. Please enjoy this message from our sponsor prior to your regularly scheduled program: What!? You don’t have the new Oll Korrect gear? Are you fucking stupid!? What the hell is your problem!? You’re unemployed, homeless, and on the verge of suicide? Shut up! Support the League! Go now to the Mother Ship right fucking now before the rest is sold out! We now return to our regular broadcast of Condemned to Combat: DEMOlition, man! Yesssss! We’re back! We’re back! You wanted real men? That’s why we’re here again. Won’t hear it on the radio. Won’t see it on TV. This is Condemned to Combat: Real Oi! and R.A.C. Yeah, man! I’m pumped, man. I’m psyched. Are you, man? Yeah you are! It’s C2C Volume 14. It’s DEMOlition, man. I missed last month’s edition, so this one’s gonna come hard. Have a shit load of stompin’ Oi! demos. Let’s go! click to download. First up is a classic of US Oi! American Eagle ‘s 1989 Demo. These tracks are from the 2015 re-edition on the mighty United Riot Records . A timeless demo that speaks for itself. If you don’t know this one your US Oi! knowledge is sadly lacking. This shit slams! Get it. What’s that? Brutal, creepy British Oi! recorded lo-fi “necro” style? Hell yeah. I’ll take it. It’s Not Dead Yet from Leed’s Battalion . This is either their third demo tape or their debut cassette EP from 2017. Whatever it is it’s nasty and it jams. All of that was released by the fucked up, underground label Anti Social Kultur England [A.S.K.E.]. Dig it. Next we got another throw back with more classic US Oi! This one is the original 1988 demo from Brute Force . Get ready for some serious demolition here with bare knuckle, brick wall American Oi! Underground icons Brute Force are emblematic of this edition of C2C, having never put out a proper record. They had this classic and followed it up with two even more obscure demo tapes. Jump on this with both boots. It’s Condemned to Combat and we’re backing up force with fucking force. Shit’s getting ugly with Denver’s Combat Force . It’s 4 Skins meets 86 Mentality meets a trash compactor. This is the original 2017 demo tape of CF ‘s vitriolic brand of raw Oi!core which was later pressed to vinyl by mysterious Youth Attack Records. Their debut EP was released this year by Youth Attack as well. Why is it on Youth Attack? Nobody knows. Trudging onward – In alphabetical order. You figured that out by now, right? – it’s the East Pittsburgh Demos by Fascine . A 2019 cassette release from the unobtainable American Defense Records . Crunchy, American garage Oi! with a hint of neo-folk in there. It’s weird but it works. Think, act, and try not to get consumed by this overwhelming demo. Get ready to ruck with First Assault ‘s Demo 2012 . These Aussies are the outliers on this edition of C2C as they put out a couple of cleaned up, legit records after this earlier demo. Those records were solid, but I always appreciated the frantic aggression of this tape more than anything else. Demolish your ears with this ferocious down under Oi! Intense, hideous, Oi! flavored hardcore from Hate Order on Abnormal Broadcasting . From 2018, self titled cassette release or demo tape? Who knows? They did another split/tour tape with some other hardcore band… I wanna say Sunk. Anyway, this one here is a belligerent, primal earful of ugly noise. Smash your armor helmet open on this. Suit up for fast paced Canadian meat head Oi! It’s Honour Guard out of Ottawa with their 2017 demo tape Ever Onward released by LSC Records . Crank it up, pound a Molson or whatever, and slam through the wall. Look at that fuckin’ cover art. You know what it’s about! Now you’re gonna get your ears pounded with Five Tracks by Klout . More Oi! tinged hardcore with a major chip on its soldier. Hailing from loud and angry South Florida, Klout is gruff, tough, and aggro. Originally a self released 2016 demo tape, this was reissued jointly by Not For You Recordings and Hardware Records . Yeah, that’s a peace sign on the cover. I always thought peace signs were for hippies. But this tape makes hippies cry. At this point it’s probably clear that the hardcore scene had something of a brief love affair with the stomping sounds of Oi! sometime between 2015 and 2020. Whether or not it’s a legitimate fusion of subgenres or phony imitation is debatable. But either way that short stretch of time produced quite a few ripping roughneck demos. Tyrant ‘s self titled 7″ released by Adult Crash may typify that current best. This Copenhagen four piece is punishing and delivers the Oi!core sound with expertise. Maybe it’s not a demo, but it’s the only record they put out. And in 3 tracks they demolish everything standing and throw you in the dumpster to be hauled to the landfill. We’re gonna finish strong with Austin Texas’s Ultras . This 2016 demo fucking goes. Displaying their US Oi! chops and demonstrating their style, Ultras dish out a furious EP’s worth of bludgeoning patriotic tunes on this rough and ready demo recording. Bizarrely released by the black metal label Knife Vision, and then a second time by the Russian Street Rock Music. For fans of Oxblood or any violent second wave American Oi! Don’t miss this one. ‘Record of Youth’ Season 1: Netflix K-Drama, Plot, Cast & Episode Release Guide. Twenty-twenty has been the best year on record for K-Dramas, and as we look ahead to what’s arriving this Fall, we can already look forward to the arrival of the romantic-drama, Record of Youth, in September 2020. Record of Youth is an upcoming Netflix Original South-Korean romantic-drama created by screenwriter Ha Myung Hee and directed by Ahn Gil Ho. When is Record of Youth season one coming to Netflix? The first episode of Record of Youth will be coming to Netflix on Monday, September 7th, 2020 . Two episodes will arrive weekly on Mondays and Tuesdays for a total of 16 episodes. The series will be broadcast in South Korean on the cable channel tVN. Each episode of Record of Youth will have an approximate runtime of 60 minutes. Full Record of Youth episode release schedule. The latest episodes of Record Youth will be available to stream the same day as its South Korean broadcast on tvN. Episode tvN Broadcast Date Netfix Release Date 1 07/09/2020 07/09/2020 2 08/09/2020 08/09/2020 3 14/09/2020 14/09/2020 4 15/09/2020 15/09/2020 5 21/09/2020 21/09/2020 6 22/09/2020 22/09/2020 7 28/09/2020 28/09/2020 8 29/09/2020 29/09/2020 9 05/10/2020 05/10/2020 10 06/10/2020 06/10/2020 11 12/10/2020 12/10/2020 12 13//10/2020 13//10/2020 13 19/10/2020 19/10/2020 14 20/10/2020 20/10/2020 15 26/10/2020 26/10/2020 16 27/10/2020 27/10/2020. What is the plot of Record of Youth ? Three young fashionistas are trying to make it big in the fashion industry, but the class division has greatly determined their paths. Dreams are a luxury that not every person can afford, but a youthful spirit and blazing passion can make all of them come true. Who are the cast members of Record of Youth ? The following stars have been confirmed for Record of Youth : Role Cast Member Where Have I Seen/Heard Them Before? Sa Hye Joon Park Bo Gum Itaewon Class | Reply 1988 | Hello Monster Ahn Jung Ha Park So Dam Cinderella and the Four Knights | Parasite |.A Beautiful Mind Won Hae Hyo Byun Woo Suk Search: WWW | Live Up to Your Name | Weightlifting Fairy Kim Bok Joo Han Ae Sook Ha Ree Ra I Love You, My Enemy | To Be With You | 1919 Yoo Kwan Soon Kim Yi Young Shin Ae Ra Ugly Alert | My Love | Master in the House Sa Min Ki Han Jin Hee Never Twice | Remember: War of the Son | Aeja’s Older Sister, Minja Sa Young Nam Park Soo Young Soul Mechanic | Hi Bye, Mama! | Doctor Prisoner Won Tae Kyeong Seo Sang Won Vagabond | Be Melodramatic | My Mister Sa Kyeong Joon Lee Jae Won Kill It | Heart Surgeons | While You Were Sleeping Lee Min Jae Shin Ae Ra Find Me inYour Memory | Doctor John | Hi Bye, Mama! Where will Record of Youth rank in the ratings? tvN has continued its output of excellent dramas throughout 2020, some of which have entered the top 50 highest-rated cable dramas in South Korea. While we suspect Record of Youth will do well in the ratings, the only thing going against it will be its Monday and Tuesday night slots. That being said, the highest performing tvN drama that aired on Mondays and Tuesdays is 100 Days My Prince , which at the time of writing is currently ranked 8th in the highest-rated cable dramas. The most successful tvN dramas typically air between Friday and Sunday nights, so hopefully, Record of Youth can compete with most successful tvN dramas like Crash Landing on You and Reply1988 . Are you looking forward to the release of Record of Youth on Netflix? Let us know in the comments below! ACS:Law gets a DDoS attack and records are exposed. Someone raised an interesting point on the Plusnet forums about whether ACS:Law (when scanning what people are downloading) are in breach of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 . Specifically the part which states: Is what ACS:Law does tantamount to wire-tapping? yes that is not how it works. their technology is only slightly more sophisticated than downloading a torrent themselves and seeing from whom the torrent is coming. one of the legal issues with this process is infact that: 1) they requested the file from your computer, it may not have been uploading it until that happened. 2) they only have evidence that you uploaded the file to them, nobody else, and they can't claim damages for that. I use Free Download Manager to download my torrents and it has the option to not seed even during downloads, this means I upload to no one :cool: I confirm this by keeping an eye on the upload figure and it always says 0KB. I use Spotify for music so have less need to download music. Listening to a phone line is intercepting. You don't have to block the communication, just listen in to part or all of it without legal permission. IP addresses and the names of files is part of someone's communication, although it's arguable whether the IP address comprises private information, given that it is akin to a telephone number and you cannot communicate on the net without making this public. The filenames though, are part of the data broadcast and received, and could be considered private data and therefore logging that could still be considered illegal under the act. I'm sure this will be investigated further. certainly in the case of point 2, if one of these were to ever come to trial i think this would be immediately exposed. 'and how many people did they share 'the work' with?' 'there were 1000 people leeching at the time' 'yes but how many did they actually up load to?' 'don't know' etc. they may even be seeding the file too. they could try to use this as evidence of how many people the accused were seeding to. you then get a situation where they could have made some of the file available to the accused. restarted their torrent and busted someone for seeding it back. i would say that was pretty harsh. you know like offering someone some drugs, then requesting to buy them back off someone. I use Free Download Manager to download my torrents and it has the option to not seed even during downloads, this means I upload to no one :cool: I confirm this by keeping an eye on the upload figure and it always says 0KB. I use Spotify for music so have less need to download music. You would get awful download speeds that way but I guess you'd get to the end eventually! Not seeding means you are still breaching the copyright (if indeed there is copyright on the material you download) but not sharing it with the world means you're less open to accusation. Does anyone know whether ACS' logging software differentiates between clients downloading a file and whether they actually share it out again? I use Free Download Manager to download my torrents and it has the option to not seed even during downloads, this means I upload to no one :cool: I confirm this by keeping an eye on the upload figure and it always says 0KB. I use Spotify for music so have less need to download music. yes that is not how it works. their technology is only slightly more sophisticated than downloading a torrent themselves and seeing from whom the torrent is coming. one of the legal issues with this process is infact that: 1) they requested the file from your computer, it may not have been uploading it until that happened. 2) they only have evidence that you uploaded the file to them, nobody else, and they can't claim damages for that. True. I very much doubt that their modified torrent client gives them access to information on who you have provided pieces of the file to. Speaking of pieces, if I am trying to sell a copy of a book and I make available one or two paragraphs as a 'taster' am I breaching the author's copyright? Unless there is only one source of a torrent file from the beginning to the end of the download, how can you prove that the entire file was provided by any one source? Is providing a small piece of it breaching the copyright for the complete piece of work? *Edit: Particularly as a few paragraphs of a book can be enjoyed in isolation much more than an unplayable partially downloaded digital file. another thing is that they are basically suggesting that the file is uploaded to 1000s of people, that's why the damages are so high. i suspect many people on ADSL only seed whilst they're downloading and probably have a ratio of around 0.2. as for modified torrent client. i doubt it somehow. there are emails where they say they are urgently looking for a company to take over their monitoring. i think uTorrent and alt + PrtScn may be more like it. Agree again. There's a massive presumption that there are thousands of people enjoying British Granny F*** solely because the accused had it on their server at one point in time. In a court of law they would be expected to provide evidence as to why they think there are so many people enjoying British Granny F*** but they just don't know that. All they can prove is that they were able to get a bit of it from you. To reuse the drug dealer analogy, they catch you offering a plain clothed officer some crack but they don't actually complete the transaction for fear of breaking the law themselves. They accuse you of having provided crack to thousands of people and try to charge you £10 for each individual offence. They have no evidence anyone ever bought a rock from you and they can't even prove that they did because they declined it. It wouldn't get to court in the first place. I think Terence Tsang was the guy involved. Terence Tsang was emailing about this. Terence Tsang was specifying a modified torrent client that Terence Tsang thought would be a simple piece of development according to Terence Tsang which would allow Terence Tsang to provide information to Terence Tsang's contacts, one Andrew Crossley on exactly who Terence Tsang thought had shared the titles Terence Tsang was interested in and the IP addresses Terence Tsang saw along with the title names Terence Tsang encountered. Whether Terence Tsang ever realised the Terence Tsang Torrent Violation Tool may be only known to Terence Tsang. I have just been hooked on the emails for the past hour, what an awful company! who the hell gave them the right to rifle through personal records and prosecute people? I'm glad they where DDoS attacked and hope the data commissioners fine of £500,000 bankrupts them. Not only that but where the hell do these people get off? they seem to be in it only for the money, they are not interested in copyright in the slightest - what an awful business! I have just been hooked on the emails for the past hour, what an awful company! who the hell gave them the right to rifle through personal records and prosecute people? I'm glad they where DDoS attacked and hope the data commissioners fine of £500,000 bankrupts them. Not only that but where the hell do these people get off? they seem to be in it only for the money, they are not interested in copyright in the slightest - what an awful business! It's terrible isn't it? I don't want to go through the emails as it will just infuriate me, and I already know everything about this company anyway. certainly in the case of point 2, if one of these were to ever come to trial i think this would be immediately exposed. 'and how many people did they share 'the work' with?' 'there were 1000 people leeching at the time' 'yes but how many did they actually up load to?' 'don't know' etc. they may even be seeding the file too. they could try to use this as evidence of how many people the accused were seeding to. you then get a situation where they could have made some of the file available to the accused. restarted their torrent and busted someone for seeding it back. i would say that was pretty harsh. you know like offering someone some drugs, then requesting to buy them back off someone. Actually, amongst the leaked emails there is a legal opinion on this very point as follows: As there is no loss from an upload to an investigator, no damages arise there. As to the damages from uploads to unknown third parties, that would probably be impossible to quantify, and consequently no claim could be made on that, and so the likelihood is that actual damages in a properly conducted case on properly pleaded evidence would most likely be that of the single unauthorised copy on the uploaders own computer. The final paragraph of that opinion reads: Because of all of these factors I believe that it would be extremely difficult to establish with any accuracy that there has been sharing except with the monitoring system which is an action by the infringer for which no damages can be accrued. Therefore, it is my belief that the rights holder can only rely on the damage resulting from making a single copy of the work in infringement of the rights granted to the rightsholder under s16(a) of the CDPA 1988. Actually, amongst the leaked emails there is a legal opinion on this very point as follows: As there is no loss from an upload to an investigator, no damages arise there. As to the damages from uploads to unknown third parties, that would probably be impossible to quantify, and consequently no claim could be made on that, and so the likelihood is that actual damages in a properly conducted case on properly pleaded evidence would most likely be that of the single unauthorised copy on the uploaders own computer. The final paragraph of that opinion reads: Because of all of these factors I believe that it would be extremely difficult to establish with any accuracy that there has been sharing except with the monitoring system which is an action by the infringer for which no damages can be accrued. Therefore, it is my belief that the rights holder can only rely on the damage resulting from making a single copy of the work in infringement of the rights granted to the rightsholder under s16(a) of the CDPA 1988. You have to say that not only that as a legal opinion could somewhat damage their case. but the fact that it is their legal opinion would probably prohibit their chances too.