DOCSLIB.ORG

Compliance and Operation of the NSW Greenhouse Gas Reduction Scheme During 2010 Report to Minister

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Compliance and Operation of the NSW Greenhouse Gas Reduction Scheme During 2010 Report to Minister Compliance and Operation of the NSW Greenhouse Gas Reduction Scheme during 2010 Report to Minister NSW Greenhouse Gas Reduction Scheme July 2011 © Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal of New South Wales 2011 This work is copyright. The Copyright Act 1968 permits fair dealing for study, research, news reporting, criticism and review. Selected passages, tables or diagrams may be reproduced for such purposes provided acknowledgement of the source is included. ISBN 978-1-921929-27-4 CP61 Inquiries regarding this document should be directed to a staff member: Margaret Sniffin (02) 9290 8486 Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal of New South Wales PO Box Q290, QVB Post Office NSW 1230 Level 8, 1 Market Street, Sydney NSW 2000 T (02) 9290 8400 F (02) 9290 2061 www.ipart.nsw.gov.au ii IPART Compliance and Operation of the NSW Greenhouse Gas Reduction Scheme during 2010 Contents Contents Foreword 1 1 Executive summary 3 1.1 What is GGAS? 3 1.2 What is IPART’s role? 4 1.3 NSW Benchmark Participants’ compliance 5 1.4 Abatement Certificate Providers’ compliance 5 1.5 Audit activities 6 1.6 Registration, ownership and surrender of certificates 6 1.7 Projected supply of and demand for certificates in coming years 7 1.8 What does the rest of this report cover? 7 2 Developments in GGAS during 2010 8 2.1 Changes to the GGAS Rules 8 2.2 Closure of GGAS to new participants 9 2.3 Cessation of Category A Generating systems 10 2.4 IPART internal review of GGAS 10 2.5 Inter-department review of GGAS 10 2.6 GGAS in the national climate policy context 12 3 NSW Benchmark Participants’ compliance performance 14 3.1 Summary of Benchmark Participants’ compliance performance in 2010 16 3.2 Number of abatement and Renewable Energy Certificates surrendered 17 3.3 Types of abatement certificates surrendered 22 3.4 Greenhouse shortfalls carried forward 22 3.5 Greenhouse Gas penalties 23 4 Abatement Certificate Providers’ compliance performance 24 4.1 Summary of Abatement Certificate Providers’ compliance performance and key accreditation statistics 24 4.2 Compliance outcomes 25 4.3 Accreditations approved in 2010 28 4.4 Accreditations amended in 2010 30 4.5 Accreditations cancelled in 2010 30 4.6 Accreditations remaining at the end of 2010, by rule 31 Compliance and Operation of the NSW Greenhouse Gas Reduction Scheme during 2010 IPART iii Contents 5 Audit activity 35 5.1 Summary of audit activity 35 5.2 Audit and technical services panel 36 5.3 Selection and management of auditors 37 6 GGAS Registry – registration, ownership and surrender of certificates 40 6.1 What is the Registry? 40 6.2 Trends certificate registration 41 6.3 Certificates surrendered 45 6.4 Certificates voluntarily surrendered 46 6.5 Certificate transfers 46 7 Supply and demand for certificates 48 7.1 Developments in 2010 that may influence future supply and demand 49 7.2 Assumptions we used in projecting supply and demand for certificates 53 7.3 Scenarios for which we projected supply and demand for certificates 56 7.4 Results of our projections for supply and demand from 2011 to 2014 56 7.5 Projected values for the NSW Pool Coefficient 60 Appendices 65 A Overview of GGAS 67 B Categories of the Generation Rule 80 C Registry data 83 Glossary 125 iv IPART Compliance and Operation of the NSW Greenhouse Gas Reduction Scheme during 2010 Foreword Foreword On 10 July 2011 the Commonwealth Government announced its proposals for a national carbon price and emissions trading scheme. While termination of GGAS is a matter for the NSW Government, most participants expect GGAS to close soon after the commencement of an equivalent national scheme if this occurs. Hence, it is timely to reflect on the achievements of GGAS and the implications of its possible closure. GGAS commenced operation in 2003 and was the world’s first mandatory carbon trading scheme. It replaced a previous ineffective licence condition that required retailers to have a plan to reduce emissions without any requirements to demonstrate that the plan was implemented or achieved any reductions in emissions. GGAS has shown that a carbon trading scheme can be successful at modest cost and without a large bureaucracy. In 2010 a team of around 12 staff (full-time equivalents) were responsible for the administration of both GGAS and ESS. One of the critical issues for GGAS has been measurement of the reduction in carbon emissions. We have drawn upon existing models but also developed and enhanced new approaches such as dealing with uncertainties associated with measuring the energy content of waste gases, especially landfill gas. It has been pleasing to see that some of the measurement frameworks developed under GGAS have been adopted by other schemes, including international schemes operating under the Kyoto protocol. In their recent reviews of emissions reduction policies in Australia, both the Productivity Commission (PC) and the Grattan Institute found that GGAS has the lowest total cost to society per tonne of emissions abated at $5 and $15 to $40, respectively. This variation in the estimates of the costs highlights the uncertainties in the modelling. Another indication of the achievement of GGAS comes from examining its practical impact on specific projects. One example is TRUenergy’s 400 MW combined-cycle gas plant at Tallawarra that generates energy with lower emissions than conventional coal-fired plants. While this plant may have proceeded without GGAS, TRUenergy made it clear in their submissions to government that the income from the sale of certificates under GGAS was an important factor in their decision to proceed when they did. Another example is the strong growth in projects that capture waste methane gas and use this to generate electricity. Many of these projects use methane gas from waste landfills. Advisors who have evaluated these Compliance and Operation of the NSW Greenhouse Gas Reduction Scheme during 2010 IPART 1 Foreword projects have indicated that the income from the sale of certificates was of critical importance for the decision to proceed with these projects. GGAS also attracted public attention. In 8 years of operation, members of the public have voluntarily surrendered approximately 1.2 million certificates. This volume suggests GGAS had become a useful mechanism for public participation in emissions reduction. This abatement has been achieved without significant increases in the cost of electricity, which is both a strength and weakness of GGAS. For a given carbon price, GGAS provides the same incentives to switch to relatively lower emission generation as the proposed national carbon trading scheme but without any significant increase in retail prices. However, this is also a weakness. It means that the costs of emissions are not signalled to the users of energy and the potential impacts on energy consumption (as opposed to generation) are lost. If GGAS is closed, we would seek to ensure an orderly approach is followed that maintains the integrity of the scheme. We are concerned about the potential for invalid creation of certificates in the final stages of GGAS that may not be recovered subsequently. For this reason we intend to monitor the patterns of certificate creation in 2011 and 2012 more closely and critically review requests for increased annual limits on certificate creation. In 2010 we commenced amending the accreditation conditions for all certificate providers to require the commissioning of an audit three months prior to the closure of the scheme. These audits will establish whether certificates have been created in accordance with the legislation and represent valid abatement. Furthermore we will start working with the members of our audit panel to discuss the practical challenge of ensuring that these audits are completed promptly to minimise the risks for the Scheme and its participants. If GGAS were to continue beyond 2012, the ongoing surplus of certificates that is suppressing the trading price will need to be addressed. We have suggested to government that, if GGAS continues, it should consider reducing the emission targets and removing the recognition of Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) from the scheme. Currently RECs are double counted because retailers can claim credit under GGAS for RECs surrendered to the Commonwealth under their national renewable energy obligations. At this critical point in the history of GGAS, I would like to thank the current and past team members who have shaped GGAS and contributed to its significant achievements. In particular, I would like to thank the current General Manager, Margaret Sniffin. I would also like to thank my colleagues on the Committee, Peter Egger and Eric Groom, for their counsel and participation in decision making. James Cox PSM Acting Chairman 2 IPART Compliance and Operation of the NSW Greenhouse Gas Reduction Scheme during 2010 1 Executive summary 1 Executive summary As part of our functions as Compliance Regulator and Scheme Administrator for the NSW Greenhouse Gas Reduction Scheme (GGAS), the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal of NSW (IPART) monitors and reports annually to the Minister for Energy on the scheme participants’ compliance, and other aspects of the scheme’s performance and operation. This report covers the 2010 calendar year, which was the 8th year of operation for GGAS. 1.1 What is GGAS? GGAS is a mandatory greenhouse gas emissions trading scheme, established under Part 9 of the Electricity Supply Act 1995 (the Act). It commenced in NSW on 1 January 2003 and the Australian Capital Territory on 1 January 2005. It will operate until either a national climate change mitigation scheme is introduced or 2021. The objectives of GGAS are to reduce greenhouse gas emissions associated with the production and use of electricity, and develop and encourage the reduction of emissions from non-electricity-related activities.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GMW Price Submission 2020-2024
    GMW Price Submission 2020-2024 November 2019 Document Number: A3692405 Page 2 of 138 Document Number: A3692405 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 8 Board Attestation .................................................................................................................................... 9 How we sought customer input ................................................................................................................ 10 Our engagement strategy .................................................................................................................... 10 Our engagement principles .................................................................................................................. 11 How we engaged ................................................................................................................................. 11 Engagement methods .......................................................................................................................... 14 Deliberative forum ................................................................................................................................ 14 How we structured our forum ........................................................................................................... 15 A fairer deal for all ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Western Downs
    Image courtesy of Shell's QGC business “We have a strong and diverse economy that is enhanced by the resource sector through employment, Traditional Resources - infrastructure and Western Downs improved services." The Western Downs is known as the “Queensland has the youngest coal- Paul McVeigh, Mayor Energy Capital of Queensland and is fired power fleet in Australia including Western Downs now emerging as the Energy Capital of the Kogan Creek Power Station, and an Regional Council. Australia. abundance of gas which will ensure the State has a reliable source of base load This reputation is due to strong energy for decades to come.” investment over the past 15 years by the Energy Production Industry - Ian Macfarlane, CEO, Mining is the second most productive (EPI) into large scale resource sector Queensland Resources Council industry in the Western Downs after developments in coal seam gas (CSG) As at June 2018, the Gross Regional construction, generating an output of 2 and coal. Product (GRP) of the Western Downs 2.23 billion in 2017/18. Gas and coal-fired power stations region has grown by 26.3% over a In 2017/18, the total value of local sales 2 feature prominently in the region with twelve-month period to reach $4 billion. was $759.2 million. Of these sales, oil a total of six active thermal power The resource industry paid $58 million and gas extraction was the highest, at 2 stations. in wages to 412 full time jobs (2017-18). 3 $615.7 million. Kogan Creek Power Station is one of The industry spent $136 million on In 2017/18 mining had the largest Australia's most efficient and technically goods and services purchased locally total exports by industry, generating advanced coal-fired power stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Sector Asset Investment Program 2008–09
    Public Sector Asset Investment Program 2008–09 Presented by John Lenders, M.P. Treasurer of the State of Victoria for the information of Honourable Members Budget Information Paper No. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction......................................................................................................................1 Coverage................................................................................................................................... 1 Assets........................................................................................................................................ 1 Document structure ................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 1: Public sector asset investment program 2008-09.....................................3 Asset management and delivery ............................................................................................... 4 General government sector asset investment ........................................................................... 9 Public non-financial corporations asset investment................................................................. 12 Project descriptions from Table 1.4 ......................................................................................... 16 Chapter 2: General government asset investment program 2008-09 ......................23 Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.................................................. 23 Department
    [Show full text]
  • Maintaining a Reliable Electricity Supply to Southern (South West and South East) Queensland
    FINAL REPORT 5 June 2009 Maintaining a reliable electricity supply to Southern (South West and South East) Queensland Disclaimer While care was taken in preparation of the information in this document, and it is provided in good faith, Powerlink accepts no responsibility or liability (including without limitation, liability to any person by reason of negligence or negligent misstatement) for any loss or damage that may be incurred by any person acting in reliance on this information or assumptions drawn from it, except to the extent that liability under any applicable Queensland or Commonwealth of Australia statute cannot be excluded. This document has been prepared for the purpose of inviting information, comment and discussion from interested parties. The document has been prepared using information provided by a number of third parties. It contains assumptions regarding, among other things, economic growth and load forecasts which may or may not prove to be correct. Powerlink makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy, reliability, completeness or suitability for particular purposes, of the information in this document. All information should be independently verified before assessing any investment proposals. DOCUMENT PURPOSE For the benefit of those not familiar with the National Electricity Rules (Rules) and the National Electricity Market (NEM), Powerlink offers the following clarifications on the purpose and intent of this document: 1. The Rules require Powerlink to carry out forward planning to identify future reliability of supply requirements and to issue this type of document for “proposed new large network assets”. 2. The Rules require Powerlink to identify, evaluate and compare both network and non-network options (including generation and demand side management) to determine which can address the future supply requirements at the lowest cost to the market and hence to electricity consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • Power System Incident Report Trip of 8811 Calvale – Tarong 275Kv Line
    POWER SYSTEM INCIDENT REPORT TRIP OF 8811 CALVALE – TARONG 275KV LINE, TARONG UNIT 2 AND COLUMBOOLA 132KV CB 73562 ON 05 NOVEMBER 2009 PREPARED BY: ESOPP DOCUMENT NO: 1.0 VERSION NO: 1.0 FINAL 1. INTRODUCTION At approximately 17:49hrs on Thursday 5th of November 2009, severe thunderstorms were experienced in the vicinity of Calvale – Tarong 275kV lines (Bureau of Meteorology - BOM issued a Severe Thunderstorm Warning) and one of the Calvale – Tarong lines - 8811 experienced a single phase trip and auto-reclose. The No.2 generating unit at Tarong Power Station (TPS) tripped from 350MW of load at around the same time. At approximately 17:50hrs, one of the 132kV feeders from T194 Columboola substation (Ergon Energy) to Condamine power station also tripped but there was no generation at Condamine power station at the time1. This report has been prepared under clause 4.8.15 of the National Electricity Rules to assess the adequacy of the provision and response of facilities and services and the appropriateness of actions taken to restore or maintain power system security. Information for this report has been provided by Powerlink, Tarong Energy, Ergon Energy and QGC Sales Pty. Ltd. Additional information has been obtained from AEMO’s Energy Management System and Market Management System. All references to time in this report refer to Market time (Australian Eastern Standard Time). 2. SUMMARY OF EVENTS At approximately 17:49hrs on Thursday 5th of November, severe thunderstorms were experienced in the vicinity of Calvale – Tarong 275kV lines. A market notice was issued at 13:47 hrs, reclassifying loss of 8810 & 8811 Calvale – Tarong double circuit 275kV lines as a credible contingency from 1345 hrs onwards.
    [Show full text]
  • Gig S0'z$ £102
    X ~ 4+ b . (t. d ~ % e | eaaNi9NaziviLNaniant1s0 [)' ivilnanianitasow s yinvHisny - -/ j a »"! P ils. al SHL. < te: Whys - 1Vd@IN39 NOILIG3 JOA gg on 'g unr £102 s0'z$ gig "py eel mmad Adelaiq A 2108 Ovg| Australia f a j - n z | ' : v Join o ur buildings team Mott M acDonald is a global management, engineering and development consultancy with 15,000 staff working on projects in 140 countries. Our award-winning work is founded on a culture of excellence, quality and innovation, contributing to cost-effective, functional and sustainable solutions. We're industry leaders in the use of building information modelling (BIM) for planning, design, project delivery and operation. Everywhere we work, our local offices are supported by the skills and resources of the global Group, ark, N ew 4 providing our clients with local service and world class solutions. Carlaw P In t he buildings sector, our work spans civic, commercial, education, health, leisure, retail, sports and transport projects. Across them all, we produce imaginative and distinctive solutions that invite corporate and civic pride. Our m ultidisciplinary services Engineering - civil, structural, mechanical, electrical and public health, fire protection, and fagades Project, programme and design management ESD and building energy consulting Vertical transportation Hydraulic design Modelling and analysis We're s eeking skilled, motivated engineers and project managers to join fast-expanding buildings teams in our offices across Australia. To f ind out more about career opportunities at Mott MacDonald visit www.careers.mottmac.com.au \fista, S ingal pore "f FROMHE T PRESIDENT a ENGINEERS A USTRALIA The d iversity advantage Marlene K anga [email protected] a u stralia's rich multicultural society has a significant competitive a dvantage, providing opportunities to foster diverse perspectives and ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Calculation of Energy Costs in the BRCI for 2010-11
    The calculation of energy costs in the BRCI for 2010-11 Includes the calculation of LRMC, energy purchase costs, and other energy costs Prepared for the Queensland Competition Authority Draft Report of 14 December 2009 Reliance and Disclaimer In conducting the analysis in this report ACIL Tasman has endeavoured to use what it considers is the best information available at the date of publication, including information supplied by the addressee. Unless stated otherwise, ACIL Tasman does not warrant the accuracy of any forecast or prediction in the report. Although ACIL Tasman exercises reasonable care when making forecasts or predictions, factors in the process, such as future market behaviour, are inherently uncertain and cannot be forecast or predicted reliably. ACIL Tasman Pty Ltd ABN 68 102 652 148 Internet www.aciltasman.com.au Melbourne (Head Office) Brisbane Canberra Level 6, 224-236 Queen Street Level 15, 127 Creek Street Level 1, 33 Ainslie Place Melbourne VIC 3000 Brisbane QLD 4000 Canberra City ACT 2600 Telephone (+61 3) 9604 4400 GPO Box 32 GPO Box 1322 Facsimile (+61 3) 9600 3155 Brisbane QLD 4001 Canberra ACT 2601 Email [email protected] Telephone (+61 7) 3009 8700 Telephone (+61 2) 6103 8200 Facsimile (+61 7) 3009 8799 Facsimile (+61 2) 6103 8233 Email [email protected] Email [email protected] Darwin Suite G1, Paspalis Centrepoint 48-50 Smith Street Darwin NT 0800 Perth Sydney GPO Box 908 Centa Building C2, 118 Railway Street PO Box 1554 Darwin NT 0801 West Perth WA 6005 Double Bay NSW 1360 Telephone
    [Show full text]
  • Surat Basin Population Report, 2020
    Queensland Government Statistician’s Office Surat Basin population report, 2020 Introduction The resource sector in regional Queensland utilises fly-in/fly-out Figure 1 Surat Basin region and drive-in/drive-out (FIFO/DIDO) workers as a source of labour supply. These non-resident workers live in regional areas while on-shift. The Australian Bureau of Statistics’ (ABS) resident population estimates for these areas do not include non-resident workers. The non-resident population represents the number of FIFO/DIDO workers who are on-shift in the region at a given point in time. This group includes those employed in construction, production, and maintenance at mining and gas industry operations, renewable energy projects and resource-related infrastructure. This report provides non-resident population estimates for the Surat Basin during the last week of June 2020. It also includes full–time equivalent (FTE) population estimates, which aggregate the resident and non-resident populations to provide a more complete indicator of demand for certain services. The Surat Basin – at a glance Estimates within this report are primarily derived from the The Surat Basin (Figure 1) is a major energy province, annual Survey of Accommodation Providers conducted by the based on coal seam gas production, coal mining and Queensland Government Statistician’s Office (QGSO). The electricity generation. The region comprises the local survey includes worker accommodation villages (WAVs), government areas (LGAs) of Maranoa (R), Western hotels, motels and caravan parks. Downs (R) and Toowoomba (R). Estimated population at June 2020: Key findings Non-resident population ....................................... 3,260 Key findings of this report include: Resident population ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Powerlink Queensland Revenue Proposal
    2018-22 POWERLINK QUEENSLAND REVENUE PROPOsaL Supporting Document Powerlink Queensland Asset Management Plan (Volume 3 - Area Plans) © Copyright Powerlink Queensland 2016 Delivering better value ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015 Volume 3 – Area Plans Prepared by: Strategy and Planning Investment and Planning December 2015 Objective ID: A2265341 DISCLAIMER This Asset Management Plan has been produced to provide general information about the development of Powerlink’s network and is a summary of the best view of asset investment strategies at the time of writing. In many cases, the projects listed in the Asset Management Plan have been selected from a large number of future scenarios and are the result of preliminary investigations. As well as the need for future analysis to evaluate system and asset conditions and alternatives, there are processes described in the National Electricity Rules that need to be followed before projects can be approved. It is possible that projects listed here may change in scope or timing, be replaced by other projects or deemed unnecessary. Business decisions and actions should not be made solely on the basis of information contained here. The Asset Management Plan does not replace any current business or approval processes. Risk costs continue to be enhanced and at this stage should not be used to solely prioritise projects or prioritise projects between asset classes as currently not all risks have been modelled which leads to some risk costs being understated. Similarly some asset risks are based on desktop analysis at an asset fleet level rather than based on individual asset condition, depending on the timing of the anticipated investment need.
    [Show full text]
  • Surat Basin Population Report, 2019
    Queensland Government Statistician’s Office Surat Basin population report, 2019 Introduction The resource sector in regional Queensland utilises fly-in/fly-out Figure 1 Surat Basin region and drive-in/drive-out (FIFO/DIDO) workers as a source of labour supply. These non-resident workers live in regional areas while on-shift. The Australian Bureau of Statistics’ (ABS) resident population estimates for these areas do not include non-resident workers. The non-resident population represents the number of FIFO/DIDO workers who are on-shift in the region at a given point in time. This group includes those employed in construction, production, and maintenance at mining and gas industry operations, renewable energy projects and resource-related infrastructure. This report provides non-resident population estimates for the Surat Basin during the last week of June 2019. It also includes full–time equivalent (FTE) population estimates, which aggregate the resident and non-resident populations to provide a more complete indicator of demand for certain services. The Surat Basin – at a glance Estimates within this report are primarily derived from the The Surat Basin (Figure 1) is a major energy province, annual Survey of Accommodation Providers conducted by the based on coal seam gas production, coal mining and Queensland Government Statistician’s Office (QGSO). The electricity generation. The region comprises the local survey includes worker accommodation villages (WAVs), government areas (LGAs) of Maranoa (R), Western hotels, motels, and caravan parks. Downs (R) and Toowoomba (R). Population at June 2019: Key findings Non-resident population ....................................... 4,040 Key findings of this report include: Resident population ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Qgc.Com.Au Email: [email protected]
    QUEENSLAND GAS COMPANY LIMITED 30 Herschel Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 GPO Box 3107, Brisbane QLD 4001 Tel: (61) 7 3020 9000 Fax: (61) 7 3012 8411 Website: www.qgc.com.au Email: [email protected] 17 October 2008 Companies Announcement Officer Australian Securities Exchange Exchange Centre 20 Bridge Street SYDNEY NSW To whom it may concern 2008 ANNUAL REPORT Queensland Gas Company Limited is pleased to provide its 2008 Annual Report after an exciting year of growth and transformation for the company. The Annual Report contains a letter from the chairman of Queensland Gas Company Limited, Mr Robert Bryan, in which he foreshadows his upcoming resignation. Yours faithfully Mark Anning Company Secretary QUEE QUEENSLAND GAS COMPANY QUEENSLAND GAS COMPANY TransformaTion ANNUAL REPORT 2008 ns ANNUAL REPORT 2008 L an D G AS C om P an Y L imi TED ANNUAL REPORT 2008 REPORT ANNUAL QGC is leading a transformation of the Australian energy sector: cleaner, greener and more secure Contents Investor backs a winner 1 Directors’ report 62 Company profile 2 Auditor’s independence declaration 76 Financial year highlights 4 Income statements 77 Letter from the Chairman 7 Balance sheets 78 Managing Director’s report 10 Statements of changes in equity 79 Gas production, infrastructure and sales 15 Cashflow statements 80 Exploration and reserves 21 Notes to the financial statements 81 Electricity 27 Directors’ declaration 129 Water 31 Independent audit report 130 Queensland Curtis LNG Project 35 Shareholder information 132 People and safety 41 Corporate governance statement 134 Sustainability 45 Definitions and glossary 152 Financial performance 50 Corporate directory 154 Acquisitions 52 Board of Directors 56 Senior management 58 Investor backs a winner To retired school principal Tom Abraham, a decision in 2001 to take a punt on shares in a little-known gas QGC 2008 explorer has since proven as lucky as picking the winner ANNUAL of the Melbourne Cup.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 May 2008 Greg Wilson Chair Essential Services Commission
    Our Ref: #2460463,2007/216/1 Your Ref: Greg Wilson 20 May 2008 Chair Essential Services Commission Level 2, 35 Spring Street Melbourne VIC 3000 Dear Greg Rural Water Price Review - Goulburn-Murray Water response to ESC draft decision Goulburn-Murray Water (G-MW) has reviewed the draft decision of the Essential Services Commission (ESC or “the Commission”) in relation to its Water Plan for the period 2008/09 to 2012/13 and is pleased to have the opportunity to respond. We note the proactive response provided by the ESC regarding the difficulty in determining future water prices in an environment undergoing significant capital investment. Importantly this capital investment has a largely unknown effect on how we will deliver our services in an automated environment. Operating efficiency gains need to be offset against the increased cost of maintaining these new structures. G-MW are grateful for the interim review opportunity to re-submit further pricing proposals for key services by October 2008. You will note in our response that G-MW have accommodated as much as practicable the recommended variances to the Water Plan 2008/09 – 2012/13. However there are some essential programs that have targeted water savings and strict timeframe deliverables. These have been clearly highlighted for your final consideration. As they are externally funded the majority of these deliverables will have little or no effect or water pricing. Details have also been provided on appropriate service standards as requested. In addition, G-MW proposes a number of changes to reflect additional obligations, such as the introduction of the Terrorism Act early this year.
    [Show full text]