DOCSLIB.ORG

Kanniyakumari District

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CENSUS OF INDIA 2011 TOTAL POPULATION AND POPULATION OF SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES FOR VILLAGE PANCHAYATS AND PANCHAYAT UNIONS KANNIYAKUMARI DISTRICT DIRECTORATE OF CENSUS OPERATIONS TAMILNADU ABSTRACT KANNIYAKUMARI DISTRICT No. of Total Total Sl. No. Panchayat Union Total Male Total SC SC Male SC Female Total ST ST Male ST Female Village Population Female 1 Agastheeswaram 12 43,632 21,745 21,887 3,721 1,836 1,885 96 51 45 2 Thovalai 16 61,765 30,665 31,100 7,313 3,667 3,646 282 144 138 3 Rajakkamangalam 12 88,200 43,734 44,466 4,891 2,407 2,484 36 20 16 4 Thackalai 7 57,180 28,468 28,712 2,419 1,224 1,195 21 8 13 5 Kurunthancode 9 65,282 32,902 32,380 1,947 992 955 26 14 12 6 Thiruvattaru 10 70,834 35,270 35,564 1,743 890 853 2,191 1,061 1,130 7 Killiyur 8 56,537 28,135 28,402 851 399 452 127 63 64 8 Munchirai 11 1,27,016 62,997 64,019 1,908 937 971 25 12 13 9 Melpuram 10 75,995 37,268 38,727 1,753 875 878 1,089 511 578 Grand Total 95 6,46,441 3,21,184 3,25,257 26,546 13,227 13,319 3,893 1,884 2,009 AGASTHEESWARAM PANCHAYAT UNION Sl. Name of Population Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes No. Panchayat Total Males Females Total Males Females Total Males Females 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 Eraviputhoor 1,709 855 854 187 92 95 - - - 2 Karumpattur 3,331 1,656 1,675 118 56 62 - - - 3 Kovalam 7,638 3,696 3,942 59 24 35 13 6 7 4 Kulasekarapuram 2,853 1,405 1,448 304 144 160 21 11 10 5 Leepuram 6,068 3,141 2,927 125 63 62 - - - 6 Maharajapuram 1,646 798 848 226 108 118 - - - 7 Nallur 3,209 1,622 1,587 613 307 306 10 5 5 8 North Tamaraikulam 3,278 1,662 1,616 235 118 117 - - - 9 Panchalingapuram 2,148 1,086 1,062 81 42 39 10 4 6 10 Ramapuram 4,775 2,378 2,397 630 314 316 30 18 12 11 Swamithope 3,139 1,538 1,601 85 43 42 3 2 1 12 Therekalpudur 3,838 1,908 1,930 1,058 525 533 9 5 4 TOTAL 43,632 21,745 21,887 3,721 1,836 1,885 96 51 45 THOVALAI PANCHAYAT UNION Sl. Name of Population Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes No. Panchayat Total Males Females Total Males Females Total Males Females 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 Arumanalloor 3,482 1,758 1,724 115 58 57 5 3 2 2 Beemanagari 1,975 965 1,010 339 162 177 4 2 2 3 Chenbagaramanputhur 5,108 2,519 2,589 1,472 730 742 17 8 9 4 Derisanamcope 1,381 680 701 25 10 15 - - - 5 Erachakulam 5,185 2,570 2,615 962 485 477 6 2 4 6 Esanthimangalam 3,832 1,879 1,953 330 159 171 - - - 7 Gnalam 3,786 1,904 1,882 220 116 104 - - - 8 Kadukkarai 2,722 1,369 1,353 272 133 139 - - - 9 Kattupudur 3,230 1,622 1,608 197 94 103 - - - 10 Madhavalayam 4,133 2,046 2,087 454 229 225 2 1 1 11 Sahayanagar 6,678 3,333 3,345 693 353 340 4 2 2 12 Thadikarankonam 6,241 3,087 3,154 268 142 126 198 98 100 13 Thellanthi 1,957 984 973 683 347 336 - - - 14 Thidal 2,021 1,010 1,011 147 69 78 - - - 15 Thirupathisaram 3,702 1,816 1,886 667 334 333 1 - 1 16 Thovalai 6,332 3,123 3,209 469 246 223 45 28 17 TOTAL 61,765 30,665 31,100 7,313 3,667 3,646 282 144 138 RAJAKKAMANGALAM PANCHAYAT UNION Sl. Name of Population Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes No. Panchayat Total Males Females Total Males Females Total Males Females 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 Althikkattuvillai 2,526 1,243 1,283 144 63 81 - - - 2 Dharmapuram 17,476 8,768 8,708 925 448 477 4 1 3 3 Elluvilai 2,954 1,449 1,505 112 52 60 - - - 4 Kanyakulam 6,852 3,419 3,433 1,271 633 638 14 9 5 5 Kesavanputhenthurai 4,177 1,972 2,205 - - - - - - 6 Manakudi 6,111 2,901 3,210 2 1 1 - - - 7 Melakrishnanpudur 2,238 1,123 1,115 57 33 24 - - - 8 Melasankarankuzhi 14,091 7,079 7,012 214 113 101 - - - 9 Pallanthurai 5,386 2,675 2,711 12 8 4 - - - 10 Parakkai 4,051 2,025 2,026 403 205 198 - - - 11 Putheri 5,576 2,798 2,778 634 317 317 18 10 8 12 Rajakkamangalam 16,762 8,282 8,480 1,117 534 583 - - - TOTAL 88,200 43,734 44,466 4,891 2,407 2,484 36 20 16 THACKALAI PANCHAYAT UNION Sl. Name of Population Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes No. Panchayat Total Males Females Total Males Females Total Males Females 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 Athivilai 7,401 3,575 3,826 49 25 24 1 1 - 2 Chadayamangalam 3,583 1,805 1,778 220 113 107 - - - 3 Kalkurichy 6,192 3,076 3,116 179 86 93 - - - 4 Maruthurkurichi 5,579 2,768 2,811 19 8 11 6 2 4 5 Muthalakurichy 4,201 2,133 2,068 343 176 167 - - - 6 Nullivilai 16,138 8,080 8,058 664 342 322 14 5 9 7 Thickanamcode 14,086 7,031 7,055 945 474 471 - - - TOTAL 57,180 28,468 28,712 2,419 1,224 1,195 21 8 13 KURUNTHANCODE PANCHAYAT UNION Sl. Name of Population Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes No. Panchayat Total Males Females Total Males Females Total Males Females 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 Kakkottuthalai 3,622 1,781 1,841 358 190 168 - - - 2 Kattimancode 8,541 4,331 4,210 157 87 70 - - - 3 Kurunthancode 7,838 3,944 3,894 195 92 103 - - - 4 Muttam 14,483 7,357 7,126 4 2 2 2 1 1 5 Nettancode 2,655 1,323 1,332 170 82 88 - - - 6 Simoncolony 9,836 5,072 4,764 7 3 4 4 2 2 7 Thalakkulam 3,921 1,915 2,006 243 136 107 - - - 8 Thenkarai 2,280 1,119 1,161 152 77 75 - - - 9 Vellichandai 12,106 6,060 6,046 661 323 338 20 11 9 TOTAL 65,282 32,902 32,380 1,947 992 955 26 14 12 THIRUVATTARU PANCHAYAT UNION Sl. Name of Population Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes No. Panchayat Total Males Females Total Males Females Total Males Females 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 Aruvikkarai 5,203 2,564 2,639 9 4 5 9 3 6 2 Ayacode 8,874 4,335 4,539 556 281 275 8 4 4 3 Balamore 306 150 156 99 46 53 3 1 2 4 Cherukole 9,952 4,961 4,991 64 34 30 16 9 7 5 Kannanoor 7,747 3,921 3,826 16 9 7 - - - 6 Kattathurai 17,271 8,598 8,673 42 25 17 - - - 7 Kumarankudi 5,541 2,757 2,784 16 8 8 - - - 8 Pechiparai 8,686 4,340 4,346 738 385 353 2,054 1,001 1,053 9 Surulacode 2,498 1,225 1,273 188 90 98 97 41 56 10 Yettacode 4,756 2,419 2,337 15 8 7 4 2 2 TOTAL 70,834 35,270 35,564 1,743 890 853 2,191 1,061 1,130 KILLIYUR PANCHAYAT UNION Sl. Name of Population Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes No. Panchayat Total Males Females Total Males Females Total Males Females 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 Enayam Puthenthurai 13,097 6,650 6,447 8 - 8 - - - 2 Kollanchy 5,101 2,560 2,541 10 7 3 - - - 3 Mathicode 6,532 3,177 3,355 417 193 224 - - - 4 Midalam 8,625 4,279 4,346 138 70 68 5 3 2 5 Mullaginavilai 4,836 2,348 2,488 - - - - - - 6 Nattalam 7,674 3,821 3,853 105 49 56 - - - 7 Paloor 6,818 3,357 3,461 164 75 89 122 60 62 8 Thipramalai 3,854 1,943 1,911 9 5 4 - - - TOTAL 56,537 28,135 28,402 851 399 452 127 63 64 MUNCHIRAI PANCHAYAT UNION Sl. Name of Population Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes No. Panchayat Total Males Females Total Males Females Total Males Females 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 Adaikkakuzhi 8,888 4,408 4,480 214 112 102 4 2 2 2 Choozhal 6,807 3,373 3,434 140 75 65 16 7 9 3 Kulappuram 7,677 3,797 3,880 81 37 44 3 2 1 4 Mankadu 4,889 2,390 2,499 79 37 42 - - - 5 Methukummal 19,417 9,513 9,904 297 163 134 - - - 6 Munchirai 2,383 1,158 1,225 260 127 133 - - - 7 Nadaikavu 8,727 4,369 4,358 123 55 68 - - - 8 Painkulam 23,630 11,709 11,921 384 176 208 - - - 9 Thoothoor 16,478 8,371 8,107 48 19 29 - - - 10 Vallathurai 19,758 9,803 9,955 204 103 101 2 1 1 11 Vavarai 8,362 4,106 4,256 78 33 45 - - - TOTAL 1,27,016 62,997 64,019 1,908 937 971 25 12 13 MELPURAM PANCHAYAT UNION Sl.
Recommended publications
  • List of Applications for the Post of Night Watchman

    List of Applications for the Post of Night Watchman

    List of applications for the post of Night Watchman Receipt Sl. Whether Application is Register Name and address of the applicant No. Accepted (or) Rejected. No. (1) (2) (3) (4) C. Nagarajan, S/o. K.Chellan, 15/15, ElangathuVilai, Palace Road, 1 6373(2) Accepted Thukalay, Kanyakumari District – 629 175. K. Arumugam, S/o. A. Karuppan, 43A/43, Arunthathiyar Street, Age exceeds the maximum 2 6475 Irulappapuram, Kottar Post, Nagercoil. age limit. Hence Rejected. Velayutha Perumal.S., S/o. V. Sudalaiandi, 6C/17, Kulalar Amman Koil Age exceeds the maximum 3 6486 Street, Vagaiadi Street, Kottar, Nagercoil. age limit. Hence Rejected. T. Mahesh, S/o. K. Thalavai, 4/48B, Balavinayagar Koil Street, Thekoor, 4 6497 Accepted Thovalai. D. Jerald, S/o. T. Devaraj, 14-102 L/3, Hookley Garden, Boothapandy Post, 5 6510 Accepted Kanyakumari District-629 852. D.Jebastin, S/o. T.Devaraj, 14-102 L/3, Hookley Garden, Bhoothapandy 6 6518 Accepted Post, Pin 629 852. S. Navaneethan, S/o. S. Saravanan, 3.278C 5/1, Gandhi Colony, 7 6520 Accepted Gurugulam Road, Asaripallam. V. Suresh, S/o. A.Velu, 5/73/4, Ambal Nagar, Kumarapuram, Thoppur, 8 6522 Accepted Kanyakumari District. M. Raju, S/o. S. Murugan, 20A, Manikavasaham Puram, Chettikulam Age exceeds the maximum 9 6532 Junction, Nagercoil. age limit. Hence Rejected A.K. Arul Kumar, 25/1, Pattarkulam Colony, Bhoothapandy Post – 629 852, 10 6589 Accepted Kanyakumari District. S.M. Saravanan, S/o. Sivan Kutty,34/2, 3rd Street, Keezhakulam, 11 6592 Accepted Padmanabhapuram, Thuckalay Post, Kanyakumari District. J. Arun Kumar, S/o. Johnson, Old No.8/41A, New No.8/35, Market Road, 12 6620 Accepted Puliyoorkurichi, Thuckalay Post – 629 175, Kanyakumari District.
  • Unusual Landing of Blue Shark

    Unusual Landing of Blue Shark

    Mar. Fish. Infor. Serv., T & E Ser., No. 233, 2017 23 A report on morphological abnormality in Scylla serrata R. Ratheesh Kumar, Swapnil S. Tandel, Vaibhav D. Mhatre and Veerendra Veer Singh Mumbai Research Centre of ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Mumbai e-mail: [email protected] Morphological abnormalities most commonly reported in crabs are alterations in carapace (mainly number and shape of antero-lateral teeth), chelipeds, walking legs and shape of the abdomen. Uran, a fishing village in Raigad district of Maharashtra, supports a good fishery of Scylla serrata commonly known as giant mud crab, found in the coastal estuarine and mangrove areas. During a survey conducted in the intertidal zone on 21st August 2017, a live juvenile of S. serrata was observed with a bifurcated claw. The crab was a male with 56 mm carapace width. Its right cheliped showed two claws articulating separately from the carpus and second claw emerged from the posterior side of the carpus. Merus of the right cheliped also showed strong rows of spines on both sides unlike Abnormal mud crab in a normal crab. The two claws were well developed to ionising radiations and toxins (Klein and Koomen. and resembled each other, except a slight difference 1993, Crustaceana, 64(1): 122-126), or due to in size. extreme environmental conditions (Pandourski and The exact reason for the present abnormality is Evtimova, 2009, Acta. Zool Bulg., 61(1): 55-67). unknown. Certain authors have concluded that such Possible reason for the present abnormality may be abnormalities may be due to injuries or accidents due to injuries or accident in the chelate leg and (Shelton et al., 1981, J.
  • Sl No App.No 1 5291 2 5292 3 5293 4 5294 5 5295 6 5296 7 5297 8 5298

    Sl No App.No 1 5291 2 5292 3 5293 4 5294 5 5295 6 5296 7 5297 8 5298

    Page 1 of 67 SL APP.NO CANDIDATE NAME NO AND ADDRESS MANIKANDANATH N, S/O NADARAJAN,, PONNARAI, 1 5291 SAHAYA NAGAR, PALAPALLAM (VIA), KANYAKUMARI- 629159 SATHEESH KUMAR K.R, S/O.KUMARADHA S,, 2 5292 VARAGU VILAI,, BETHELPURAM POST,, KANYAKUMARI-0 SHIJU R, S/O.RAMALINGAM NADAR, 3 5293 KAVU VILAI HOUSE,, METHUKUMMAL POST,, S.T.MANKAD, KANYAKUMARI- 629172 ROBINSON R, S/O ROBINSON[L], 4 5294 4-139, APPATTU VILAI, KAPPUKAD POST, KANYAKUMARI- 629162 SELVAKUMAR.T, S/O S.THANGAPPAN, 5 5295 NORTH STREET, MYLAUDY POST, KANYAKUMARI- 629403 NESA RAJA KUMAR, S/O.NESAMON I, 6 5296 KUZHIVILAI HOUSE, THENGAPATTANAM POST, KANYAKUMARI- 0 JAGADEESAN A, S/O AYYAPPA [LATE], 7 5297 1/120B, AKSHARA BAVAN, KRISHNAMANGALAM, THUCKALAY KANYAKUMARI- 629175 MANOHARAN A, S/O ARIKRISHNA PERUMAL, 8 5298 D.NO.3-4,, ATHIKATTU VILAI, MONIKETTIPOTTAL POST- KANYAKUMARI- 629501 Page 2 of 67 NELSON A, S/O ALLECY, 9 5299 KONATHU VILAI, KOODAITHUCKY ROAD, KULASEKHARAM POST KANYAKUMARI- 629161 JOHN BENNET.N, S/O NESAMANI .N 10 5300 MAN PATTAN VILAI, CHERUKOLE, KATTATHURAI POST, KANYAKUMARI- 629158 DAVINSON.C.R, DAVIS COTTAGE, 11 5301 KUTHIRAI VAIKALI VEEDU KOLLAL, KANJAMPURAM POST KANYAKUMARI- 629154 JAYAKUMAR.N, S/O S.NARAYANAN, 12 5302 4-114,PADAR NILAM, VAYAL KARAI, MANAVALAKURICHY POST KANYAKUMARI- 629252 SUNIL T, S/O THANKIAN N 13 5303 KARUMPILA VILAI HOUSE ADAIKKA KUZHI POST KALIYAKKAVILAI VIA KANYAKUMARI- 629153 SASI KUMAR P, S/O PACHAN,, 14 5304 KANCHIRA VILAGAM HOUSE, AYINKAMAMDESOM, KALIAKKAVILAI PO, KANYAKUMARI- 629153 THIYAGARAJAN.T, S/O M.THIRULINGAM, 15 5305 17- 10,CHOTHA VILAI, PUTHALAM POST, KANYAKUMARI- 629602 SREE KUMAR M, S/O.MURUGAN,, 16 5306 POOCHIKATTU VILAI,, THICKANAMCODE POST, KANYAKUMARI-0 Page 3 of 67 MANIGANDAN S, S/O SIVAGURUNATHAN,, 17 5307 19-61B PUVIYOOR,, SOUTH THAMARAIKULAM, AGASTEESWARAM POST.
  • Private Schools Fee Determination Committee Chennai-600 006 - Fees Fixed for the Year 2013-2016 - District: Kanyakumari

    Private Schools Fee Determination Committee Chennai-600 006 - Fees Fixed for the Year 2013-2016 - District: Kanyakumari

    PRIVATE SCHOOLS FEE DETERMINATION COMMITTEE CHENNAI-600 006 - FEES FIXED FOR THE YEAR 2013-2016 - DISTRICT: KANYAKUMARI SL. SCHOOL HEARING SCHOOL NAME & ADDRESS YEAR LKG UKG I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII NO. CODE DATE Artesia Nursery & 2013 - 14 4550 4550 5700 5700 5700 5700 5700 - - - - - - - Primary School, Near St.Antony's 1 010002 Church, 07-05-2013 2014 - 15 5005 5005 6270 6270 6270 6270 6270 - - - - - - - Kappukad Post-629 162, Vilavancod Taluk Kanyakumari D 2015 - 16 5506 5506 6897 6897 6897 6897 6897 - - - - - - - 2013 - 14 3200 3200 3910 3910 3910 3910 3910 - - - - - - - Desiya Vidya Kedra Nursery & Primary 2 010004 School, 07-05-13 2014 - 15 3520 3520 4301 4301 4301 4301 4301 - - - - - - - Villukiri - 629 180. Kanyakumari District. 2015 - 16 3872 3872 4732 4732 4732 4732 4732 - - - - - - - 2013 - 14 4800 4800 6000 6000 6000 6000 6000 - - - - - - - Devi Nursery & Primary School, 3 010005 Kunnamagal, 26-03-13 2014 - 15 5280 5280 6600 6600 6600 6600 6600 - - - - - - - Vaniyakudi P.O Kanyakumari - 629 251 2015 - 16 5808 5808 7260 7260 7260 7260 7260 - - - - - - - 2013 - 14 3200 3200 4200 4200 4200 4200 4200 - - - - - - - Emilin Memorial Nursery & Primary School 4 010006 CSI, Kanjirapuram, 12-03-2013 2014 - 15 3520 3520 4620 4620 4620 4620 4620 - - - - - - - Kanjiracode - 629 155. Kanyakum 2015 - 16 3872 3872 5082 5082 5082 5082 5082 - - - - - - - 2013 - 14 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 3600 - - - - - - - Good Samaritan Nursery & Primary School, 5 010007 Nediyasalai, 13-03-13 2014 - 15 3960 3960 3960 3960 3960 3960 3960 - - - - - - - Arumanai Post, Kanyakumari District. 2015 - 16 4356 4356 4356 4356 4356 4356 4356 - - - - - - - JOHN PAUL II N & P 2013 - 14 5300 5300 6300 6300 6300 6300 6300 - - - - - - - SCHOOL KULASEKHARAM 6 010009 7-5-13 2014 - 15 5830 5830 6930 6930 6930 6930 6930 - - - - - - - 629 161 ARANIVILAI KANYAKUMARI 2015 - 16 6413 6413 7623 7623 7623 7623 7623 - - - - - - - 1 PRIVATE SCHOOLS FEE DETERMINATION COMMITTEE CHENNAI-600 006 - FEES FIXED FOR THE YEAR 2013-2016 - DISTRICT: KANYAKUMARI SL.
  • Kanniyakumari District

    Kanniyakumari District

    STRICT DSTRICT GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINING DISTRICT SURVEY REPORT FOR ROUGHSTONE KANNIYAKUMARI DISTRICT (Prepared as per Gazette Notification S.O 3611(E) Dated 25.07.2018 of Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change MoEF & CC) Contents S.No Chapter Page No. 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Overview of Mining Activity in the District; 4 3.0 General profile of the district 6 4.0 Geology of the district; 11 5.0 Drainage of irrigation pattern 17 6.0 Land utilisation pattern in the district; Forest, Agricultural, 18 Horticultural, Mining etc 7.0 Surface water and ground water scenario of the district 22 8.0 Rainfall of the district and climate condition 22 9.0 Details of the mining lease in the district 25-31 10.0 Details of Royalty / Revenue received in the last three years 32 11.0 Details of Production of Minor Mineral in last three Years 33 12.0 Mineral map of the district 34 13.0 List of letter of intent (LOI) holder in the district along with its 35 validity 14.0 Total mineral reserve available in the district. 36 15.0 Quality / Grade of mineral available in the district 39 16.0 Use of mineral 40 17.0 Demand and supply of the mineral in the last three years 40 18.0 Mining leases marked on the map of the district 41 19.0 Details of the area where there is a cluster of mining leases viz., 43 number of mining leases, location (latitude & longitude) 20.0 Details of eco-sensitive area 43 21.0 Impact on the environment due to mining activity 45 22.0 Remedial measure to mitigate the impact of mining on the 47 environment
  • Basic Needs of 39 Coastal Fishing Communities in Kanniyakumari District, Tamil Nadu, India Bay of Bengal Programme Bobpimm/1

    Basic Needs of 39 Coastal Fishing Communities in Kanniyakumari District, Tamil Nadu, India Bay of Bengal Programme Bobpimm/1

    BASIC NEEDS OF 39 COASTAL FISHING COMMUNITIES IN KANNIYAKUMARI DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU, INDIA BAY OF BENGAL PROGRAMME BOBPIMM/1 Mimeo Series BASIC NEEDS OF 39 COASTAL FISHING COMMUNITIES IN KANNIYAKUMARI DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU, INDIA A SURVEY TO INVESTIGATE AND PRIORITISE PROBLEMS REGARDING SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE by ReneJ.C.Verduijn Associate Professional Officer (Fishery Resource Economist) Bay ofBengalProgramme BAY OF BENGAL PROGRAMME, Chennai, India 2000 ii Preface This document describes a survey of the basic needs of 39 coastal fishing communities of Kanniyakumari district, Tamil Nadu, India, as perceived by the communities. The survey investigated and prioritized the communities’ needs for basic services such as water,education and health care. The survey was a co-operative effort ofthe Tamil Nadu Department ofFisheries, the Coastal Peace and DevelopmentCommittee of the Kottar Diocese, and the Bay ofBengal Programme (FAO/UN). The survey was carried out during the first half of 1998 by two local enumerators in each village selected by the Coastal Peace and Development Committee. All the enumerators were together imparted training for a day by the BOBP on the conduct of interviews, and given questionnaires. The enumerators conducted group interviews with fisherfolk of the 39 communities, both men and women, about the status of local services. This document details the findings of the survey and the comments by the respondents. It is hoped that these are founduseful by various governmentagencies and the church in improving the status of basic services and infrastructure in coastal areas of Kanniyakumari district. The survey, and this report of the survey, are part of the BOBP’s effort in co-operation with the TamilNadu Department of Fisheries to improve fisheries management in Kanniyakumari district.
  • Rajakkamangalam Thurai Fishing Harbour Pvt., Ltd., Rep

    Rajakkamangalam Thurai Fishing Harbour Pvt., Ltd., Rep

    1 BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI Appeal No.77 of 2015 (SZ) IN THE MATTER OF: Rajakkamangalam Thurai Fishing Harbour Pvt., Ltd., Rep. by its Director, No.26/40, St. Arockia Annai Building, Rajakkamangalam Thurai and Post, Agastheeswaram Taluk, Kanyakumari District. ..Appellant AND 1. Union of India, Rep.by its Secretary, The Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi. 2. The Secretary to Government, Environment and Forest Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 3. The Member Secretary/ Director Environment, Tamil Nadu Coastal Zone Management Authority, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai. 2 4. The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, Nagerkoil- 629 001. 5. T. Dharmakrishnan, S/o. Thangiah Nadar, Paniyoor, Ethamozhi Post- 629 501. 6. The Chairman, Paniyoor Region Citizen Welfare Trust, 22-25, Paniyoor, Rajakkamangalam P.O., Kanyakumari District. ...Respondents Counsel appearing for the Appellant : Mr.P.B.Sahasranaman for M/s. TAAURS ASSOCIATES S. Kamaleshkannan and S. Sai Sathya Jith Counsel appearing for the Respondents : Mr. G.M. Syed Nurullah Sheriff for R1 M/s. M.K. Subramanian and P. Velmani for R2 to R4 M/s. Yogeshwaran for Clifton D’ Rozario, Maitreyi Krishnan, Aishwarya Rao & Raghupathy.S for R5 and R6 3 J U D G E M E NT PRESENT: HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE M.S.NAMBIAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER HON’BLE SHRI P.S. RAO, EXPERT MEMBER Delivered by Hon’ble Justice M.S.NAMBIAR , Judicial Member Dated:23rd December, 2016 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whether the Judgement is allowed to be published on the Internet – Yes/No Whether the Judgement is to be published in the All India NGT Reporter – Yes/No The Rajakkamangalam Thurai Development Trust by its representation dated 30.04.2004 requested the Government of Tamil Nadu to construct a Fishing Harbour at Rajakkamangalam Thurai in Kanyakumari District under BOOT (Build-Own-Operate- Transfer) system.
  • The Legend Marthanda Varma [1] C.Parthiban Sarathi [1] II M.A History, Scott Christian College(Autonomous), Nagercoil

    The Legend Marthanda Varma [1] C.Parthiban Sarathi [1] II M.A History, Scott Christian College(Autonomous), Nagercoil

    ISSN (Online) 2456 -1304 International Journal of Science, Engineering and Management (IJSEM) Vol 2, Issue 12, December 2017 The legend Marthanda Varma [1] C.Parthiban Sarathi [1] II M.A History, Scott Christian College(Autonomous), Nagercoil. Abstract:-- Marthanda Varma the founder of modern Travancore. He was born in 1705. Anizham Tirunal Marthanda Varma rule of Travancore in 1929. Marthanda Varma headquarters in Kalkulam. Marthanda Varma very important policy in Blood and Iron policy. Marthanda Varma reorganised the financial department the palace of Padmanabhapuram was improved and several new buildings. There was improvement of communication following the opening of new Roads and canals. Irrigation works like the ponmana and puthen dams. Marthanda Varma rulling period very important war in Battle of Colachel. The As the Dutch military team captain Eustachius De Lannoy and our soldiers surrendered in Travancore king. Marthanda Varma asked Dutch captain Delannoy to work for the Travancore army Delannoy accepted to take service under the maharaja Delannoy trained with European style of military drill and tactics. Commander in chief of the Travancore military, locally called as valia kapitaan. This king period Padmanabhaswamy temple in Ottakkal mandapam built in Marthanda Varma. The king decided to donate his recalm to Sri Padmanabha and thereafter rule as the deity's vice regent the dedication took place on January 3, 1750 and thereafter he was referred to as Padmanabhadasa Thrippadidanam. The legend king Marthanda Varma 7 July 1758 is dead. Keywords:-- Marthanda Varma, Battle of Colachel, Dutch military captain Delannoy INTRODUCTION English and the Dutch and would have completely quelled the rebels but for the timidity and weakness of his uncle the Anizham Tirunal Marthanda Varma was a ruler of the king who completed him to desist.
  • CHAPTER-I! FORMATION of DEVASWOM DEPARTMENT The

    CHAPTER-I! FORMATION of DEVASWOM DEPARTMENT The

    CHAPTER-I! FORMATION OF DEVASWOM DEPARTMENT The year 1811 is important in the history of temple administration in Travancore as it was the year in which the state government assumed direct management of 348 major and 1123 minor devaswoms on the initiative of resident dewan, Col. Munro, with the approval of the sovereign, Rani Gowri Lakshmi Bai (1810- 1815). The reasons stated by Col. Munro for assumption of such temples were many and manifold. The sannad written by him on 3rd Kanni 987 M.E (September 1811) was a clear evidence to substantiate the reasons attributed to his act of assumption of temples'. The Circumstances which lead to the formation of the devaswom department originated from the ugly state of administration of temples by the uralars, the temple trustees, that culminated into the take over of such temples by Col. Munro. He said, "The devaswom affairs in this country have long been the 1 Col.Munro, Anu of Sannad addressed to the Nine Mukathu Sarvathikariakars, 987 M.E(A.D. 1811) 31 subject of my anxiety, because the landed properties of devaswoms are uncultivated and yield no revenue and on account of frauds, there are heavy arrears and defaults in ceremonies in the devaswoms. Frauds and discrepancies are taking place in the expenditure laid down for the devaswoms and in connection with pattuparivattam (cloth for the idol), thiruvabharanam (ornaments for the idol) and temple vessels 2". He also pointed out that the temples were not being thatched or repaired from time to time and they were in a dilapidated condition.
  • Temple Entry Movement for Depressed Class in South Travancore [Kanyakumari] Prathika

    Temple Entry Movement for Depressed Class in South Travancore [Kanyakumari] Prathika

    Prathika. S al. International Journal of Institutional & Industrial Research ISSN: 2456-1274, Vol. 3, Issue 1, Jan-April 2018, pp.4-7 Temple Entry Movement for Depressed Class in South Travancore [Kanyakumari] Prathika. S Ph.D. Research Scholar, Department of History and Research Centre, S.T. Hindu College, Nagercoil 629002. Abstract: The four Tamil speaking taluks of Kanyakumari Dist viz;Agasteeswaram, Thovalai, Kalkulam and Vilavancode consisted the erst while South Tavancore. Among the various religions, Hinduism is the predominant one constituting about two third of the total population. The important Hindu temples found in Kanyakumari District are at Kanyakumari, Suchindrum, Kumarakoil,Nagercoil, Thiruvattar and Padmanabhapuram. The village God like Madan,Isakki, Sasta are worshipped by the Hindus. The people of South Travancore segregated and lived on the basis of caste. The whole population could be classified as Avarnas or Caste Hindus and Savarnas or non-caste people. The Savarnas such as Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, and Sudras who enjoyed special powers and privileges of wealth constituted the higher castes. The Avarnas viz the Nadars, Ezhavas, Mukkuvas, Sambavars, Pulayas and numerous hill tribes were considered as the polluting castes and were looked down on and had to perform various services for the Savarnas . Avarnas were not allowed in public places, temples, and the temple roads also. Low caste people or Avarnas were considered as untouchable people. Untouchability, one of the major debilities prevailed among the lower order of the society in South Travancore caused an indelible impact on the society. Keywords: Temple Entry Movement, Depressed Class, Kanyakumari reformers against that oppressive activities.
  • SIGNAL-IN-SPACE ICD for INCOIS MESSAGES Via Navic MESSAGING SERVICE

    SIGNAL-IN-SPACE ICD for INCOIS MESSAGES Via Navic MESSAGING SERVICE

    ISRO-IRNSS-ICD-MSG-INCOIS-1.0 SIGNAL-IN-SPACE ICD FOR INCOIS MESSAGES via NavIC MESSAGING SERVICE VERSION 1.0 March 2019 SATELLITE NAVIGATION PROGRAMME U.R.RAO SATELLITE CENTRE INDIAN SPACE RESEARCH ORGANIZATION BANGALORE ISRO-IRNSS-ICD-MSG-INCOIS-1.0 SIGNAL-IN-SPACE ICD FOR INCOIS MESSAGES via NavIC MESSAGING SERVICE VERSION 1.0 March 2019 SATELLITE NAVIGATION PROGRAMME U.R.RAO SATELLITE CENTRE INDIAN SPACE RESEARCH ORGANIZATION BANGALORE SIGNAL-IN-SPACE ICD FOR INCOIS MESSAGES via NavIC MESSAGING SERVICE Preface This document provides the Signal and the Data Structure for Messaging service using IRNSS spacecraft. The document addresses the signal modulations, the frequency band, the received power levels, the data structures, their interpretations etc. This document also provides the encoding and decoding schemes for different information and warning messages generated by INCOIS viz. Potential Fishing Zones; High Waves, Cyclones and Tsunami alert messages. SIGNAL-IN-SPACE ICD FOR INCOIS MESSAGES via NavIC MESSAGING SERVICE Revision Record Version No. Description Document Release Date 1.0 First Release March 2019 SIGNAL-IN-SPACE ICD FOR INCOIS MESSAGES via NavIC MESSAGING SERVICE Terms of Use & Disclaimers The Signal-in-Space ICD for messaging service is released to the public to provide the essential information to facilitate IRNSS signals for messaging-based applications, according to the terms and conditions specified hereafter: – The publishing authority does not make any assurance on the fitness of the information furnished in the document for any specific purpose. The contents of the document are only for information and the publishing authority does not assume any legal liability for any product developed based on the information.
  • The Yoke of Linked Credit : a Study of Coastal Villages in Kanyakumari District, Tamil Nadu

    The Yoke of Linked Credit : a Study of Coastal Villages in Kanyakumari District, Tamil Nadu

    Journal of Rural Development, Vol. 33 No. (2) pp. 161-172 NIRD, Hyderabad. THE YOKE OF LINKED CREDIT : A STUDY OF COASTAL VILLAGES IN KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU S.Sahayaselvi* ABSTRACT Almost in everyone’s life, credit becomes important as it serves as a shock-absorber in handling the difficulties of personal economy. In particular, it comes to be a life-support in the lives of fishermen because of the hazardous nature of their occupation, seasonal income and the paucity of funds. To maintain their trade and more often for their survival itself, the fishermen in the coastal sector of Kanyakumari district (study area) are found to be using both formal and informal credit sources. It has been found that the formal sources hardly lend down credit to these fishermen due to non-collateral security requirements, thus forcing the fishermen to have recourse to the informal sources for their credit needs which pushes the sample respondents' either into market linked or labour linked credit. This type of credit binds the fishermen to sell their catch at under-pricing or under-weighing. As a consequence, result from 376 samples indicate that irrespective of the crafts they own, an average sample respondents' economic position is reported to be low and they live in utter poverty with a hand to mouth situation. The fishermen, who borrow loans and advances, opt for this slow poison which has a stranglehold on them throughout their lives. This paper presents a number of recommendations for policy interventions to redress this danger and to uplift the economic condition of the fisherfolk who contribute 1.10 per cent to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of Indian economy.