DOCSLIB.ORG

Updated Environmental Resource Inventory Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Updated Environmental Resource Inventory Of Environmental Resource Inventory-Update 2020 202 1 Borough of Glen Rock Borough of Glen Rock Environmental Resource Inventory PREPARED FOR THE: Page intentionally left blank Environmental Resource Inventory Borough of Glen Rock ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Glen Rock Environmental Commission Commissioners: Co-Chairs Sylvia Rabacchi and Ben Meyer Lesley Elton Scott King Ken Jones Candace Lynch Ann Marie Brennan Alternates: Laura Occhipinti Sara Froikin-Gordon Council Liaison: Council Member Amy Martin Members of the Glen Rock ERI Subcommittee: Sylvia Rabacchi and Ben Meyer - AND - Project Consultants-Updated Document: (July 12, 2021 Update) b a B URGIS A SSOCIATE S, I NC. Ed Snieckus, Jr. PP, LLA, ASLA Project Consultants-Original Document: (Original Date: July 14, 2009) 119 Cherry Hill Road, Suite 200 Parsippany, NJ 07054 http://www.h2m.com The Environmental Commission wishes to thank all who contributed information and their effort towards the completion of this ERI update. 1 Page intentionally left blank Environmental Resource Inventory Borough of Glen Rock 2020 BOROUGH OF GLEN ROCK ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE INVENTORY BOROUGH OF GLEN ROCK BERGEN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY PREPARED FOR: Borough of Glen Rock Environmental Commission BA# 3661.01 The original document was appropriately signed and sealed on July 12, 2021 in accordance with Chapter 41 of Title 13 of the State Board of Professional Planners. ─────────────────── Edward Snieckus, P.P., L.A., ASLA New Jersey Professional Planner #5442 2 Page intentionally left blank Environmental Resource Inventory Borough of Glen Rock CONTENTS SECTION I: OVERVIEW............................................................................................................ 7 THE ERI PROCESS............................................................................................................................ 7 OVERVIEW OF GLEN ROCK .............................................................................................................. 7 BERGEN COUNTY .......................................................................................................................... 10 REGIONAL CONTEXT AND PLANS .................................................................................................. 12 TRANSPORTATION & INFRASTRUCTURE........................................................................................ 14 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................ 19 SECTION II: OPEN SPACE ..................................................................................................... 20 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 20 GLEN ROCK’S OPEN SPACE ........................................................................................................... 21 PRESERVING OPEN SPACE ............................................................................................................. 27 COUNCIL ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING (COAH) & OPEN SPACE .................................................... 28 LAND USE/LAND COVER IN GLEN ROCK ...................................................................................... 29 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................ 30 SECTION III: GEOLOGY ........................................................................................................ 32 INTRODUCTION: WHAT IS GEOLOGY? .......................................................................................... 32 GLEN ROCK’S LOCATION .............................................................................................................. 32 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS IN GLEN ROCK ............................................................................................ 41 SECTION IV: SOILS ................................................................................................................. 47 INTRODUCTION TO SOILS ............................................................................................................... 47 SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM ..................................................................................................... 47 GLEN ROCK SOILS ......................................................................................................................... 48 SOIL CHARACTERISTICS ................................................................................................................ 52 SECTION V: WATER SUPPLY & PROTECTION ............................................................... 54 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 54 GLEN ROCK’S DRINKING WATER .................................................................................................. 54 WATER SUPPLY WELLS ................................................................................................................. 57 GROUND WATER RECHARGE ........................................................................................................ 58 WATER RESTRICTIONS .................................................................................................................. 60 WELL HEAD PROTECTION AREAS ................................................................................................. 61 DRINKING WATER CONTAMINANTS IN GLEN ROCK ..................................................................... 63 KNOWN CONTAMINATED SITES .................................................................................................... 66 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................. 68 3 Environmental Resource Inventory Borough of Glen Rock SECTION VI: SURFACE WATER, STORMWATER & THE WATERSHED .................. 70 GLEN ROCK’S WATERWAYS.......................................................................................................... 70 SURFACE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS ...................................................................................... 73 URBANIZATION & STORMWATER ................................................................................................. 74 FLOODING ...................................................................................................................................... 80 GLEN ROCK IN THE GREATER WATERSHED .................................................................................. 82 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................. 87 SECTION VII: WETLANDS ..................................................................................................... 89 THE VALUE OF WETLANDS ........................................................................................................... 89 NJDEP FRESHWATER WETLANDS PROGRAM ............................................................................... 89 WETLANDS IN GLEN ROCK ........................................................................................................... 90 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................. 90 SECTION VIII: AIR QUALITY ............................................................................................... 92 LOCAL RESOURCES GOVERNING AIR QUALITY ............................................................................ 92 AIR POLLUTION CRITERIA: SIX MAJOR POLLUTANTS ................................................................. 93 AIR MONITORING: THE AIR QUALITY INDEX ............................................................................... 93 LOCAL SOURCES OF AIR POLLUTION ............................................................................................ 99 SECTION IX: VEGETATION AND TREES ......................................................................... 103 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 103 COMMUNITY FORESTRY MANAGEMENT RESOURCES ................................................................. 103 COMMUNITY / PUBLIC PROGRAMS .............................................................................................. 104 SIGNIFICANT/HISTORIC TREES .................................................................................................... 108 HISTORICAL VEGETATION ........................................................................................................... 109 BENEFITS OF VEGETATION .......................................................................................................... 110 THREATS TO VEGETATION .......................................................................................................... 113 THE FUTURE OF THE GLEN ROCK’S COMMUNITY FOREST ......................................................... 117 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................... 118 SECTION X: HABITAT AND WILDLIFE ........................................................................... 121 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Smithsonian Institution Archives (SIA)
    SMITHSONIAN OPPORTUNITIES FOR RESEARCH AND STUDY 2020 Office of Fellowships and Internships Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC The Smithsonian Opportunities for Research and Study Guide Can be Found Online at http://www.smithsonianofi.com/sors-introduction/ Version 2.0 (Updated January 2020) Copyright © 2020 by Smithsonian Institution Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 How to Use This Book .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Anacostia Community Museum (ACM) ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Archives of American Art (AAA) ....................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Asian Pacific American Center (APAC) .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage (CFCH) ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Cooper-Hewitt,
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Seventeenth Wildlife Damage Management Conference, Orange Beach, AL, February 26-March 1, 2017
    PROCEEDINGS SEVENTEENTH WILDLIFE DAMAGE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Perdido Beach Resort Orange Beach, AL February 26 – March 1, 2017 Sponsored by USDA APHIS Wildlife Services Tomahawk Live Trap ALFA Alabama Farmers Federation Facilitated by Wildlife Damage Management Working Group of The Wildlife Society Alabama Cooperative Extension System School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University USDA Wildlife Services-Alabama Editors Dana J. Morin Michael J. Cherry Published at Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL USA i Conference Committees Conference Chair Mark D. Smith, Alabama Cooperative Extension System, School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University Program Committee Jim Armstrong (Chair)—Alabama Cooperative Extension System, School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University Ken Gruver—UDSA Wildlife Services-Alabama Bronson Strickland—Mississippi State University Extension, Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University Brian Dorr—USDA/APHIS/Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center Michael Mengak—Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia Field Trip Coordinator Leif Stephens—UDSA Wildlife Services-Alabama Proceedings Co-Editors Dana J. Morin, Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory, Southern Illinois University Michael J. Cherry, Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech ii The Wildlife Society - Wildlife Damage Management Working Group Officers and Board Members Chair – Joe Caudell; Indiana Department of
    [Show full text]
  • Glen Rock Environmental Resource Inventory, 2009
    Environmental Resource Inventory Borough of Glen Rock ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Members of the Glen Rock ERI Subcommittee: Naomi Gamorra, Glen Rock Environmental Commission Candy Hall, Glen Rock Environmental Commission Robert Dill, Glen Rock Environmental Commission Robert Fenz, Glen Rock Environmental Commission Cindy Mehallow, Glen Rock Environmental Commission Jon Osborne, Glen Rock Planning Board Leslie Kameny, Shade Tree Advisory Committee - AND - Project Consultants: 119 Cherry Hill Road, Suite 200 Parsippany, NJ 07054 http://www.h2m.com Michael Pessolano, PP, AICP, Senior Planner Jessica Giorgianni, PP, AICP, Project Planner Environmental Resource Inventory Borough of Glen Rock CONTENTS SECTION I: OVERVIEW............................................................................................................ 6 THE ERI PROCESS............................................................................................................................ 6 OVERVIEW OF GLEN ROCK.............................................................................................................. 6 BERGEN COUNTY ............................................................................................................................ 9 REGIONAL CONTEXT AND PLANS.................................................................................................. 11 TRANSPORTATION & INFRASTRUCTURE........................................................................................ 13 CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Continuation Sheet Passaic County Hawthorne, New Jersey Section Number Page
    NPS Form 10-900 f K OMB No - 1 0024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Place! Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations f National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National by entering the information requested. If an Item does not apply I nthe uiupeny being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property - historic name The John W. Rea House ("The Rea House")______________________________ other names/site number The Doremus House___________________________________ 2. Location N/A street & number 675 Goffle Road D not for publication city or town Hawthorne, Borough of _ D vicinity state New Jersey code 034 county Passaic code °31 Zip code °7506 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this S nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property meets EH does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant nationall/D statewide,® Jwally. (D See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signaturi Sf certifying official/Title ' Date Assistant Commissioner for Natural & Historic Resources/DSHPO State of federal agency and bureau In/ m# opinion, the property D meetsLU does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Assabet River National Wildlife Refuge Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan January 2005
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Assabet River National Wildlife Refuge Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan January 2005 This goose, designed by J.N. “Ding” Darling, has become the symbol of the National Wildlife Refuge System The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is the principle federal agency for conserving, protecting, and enhancing fish and wildlife in their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. The Service manages the 96-million acre National Wildlife Refuge System comprised of 544 national wildlife refuges and thousands of waterfowl production areas. It also operates 65 national fish hatcheries and 78 ecological services field stations. The agency enforces federal wildlife laws, manages migratory bird populations, restores significant fisheries, conserves and restores wildlife habitat such as wetlands, administers the Endangered Species Act, and helps foreign governments with their conservation efforts. It also oversees the Federal Aid program which distributes hundreds of millions of dollars in excise taxes on fishing and hunting equipment to state wildlife agencies. Comprehensive Conservation Plans provide long term guidance for management decisions; set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes; and, identify the Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans do not constitute
    [Show full text]
  • Passaic County, New Jersey (All Jurisdictions)
    VOLUME 1 OF 5 PASSAIC COUNTY, NEW JERSEY (ALL JURISDICTIONS) COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER BLOOMINGDALE, BOROUGH OF 345284 CLIFTON, CITY OF 340398 HALEDON, BOROUGH OF 340399 HAWTHORNE, BOROUGH OF 340400 LITTLE FALLS, TOWNSHIP OF 340401 NORTH HALEDON, BOROUGH OF 340402 PASSAIC, CITY OF 340403 PATERSON, CITY OF 340404 POMPTON LAKES, BOROUGH OF 345528 PROSPECT PARK, BOROUGH OF 340406 RINGWOOD, BOROUGH OF 340407 TOTOWA, BOROUGH OF 340408 WANAQUE, BOROUGH OF 340409 WAYNE, TOWNSHIP OF 345327 WEST MILFORD, TOWNSHIP OF 340411 WOODLAND PARK, BOROUGH OF 340412 Preliminary: January 9, 2015 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 34031CV001B Version Number 2.1.1.1 The Borough of Woodland Park was formerly known as the Borough of West Paterson. NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Part or all of this FIS may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this FIS may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current FIS components. Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: September 28, 2007 Revised Countywide FIS Date: This preliminary FIS report does not include unrevised Floodway Data Tables or unrevised Flood Profiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Responses to Habitat Fragmentation Per Se
    ES48CH01-Fahrig ARI 18 September 2017 16:55 Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics Ecological Responses to Habitat Fragmentation Per Se Lenore Fahrig Geomatics and Landscape Ecology Research Laboratory, Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2017. 48:1–23 Keywords First published online as a Review in Advance on landscape pattern, landscape structure, landscape configuration, landscape May 31, 2017 complementation, landscape connectivity, landscape heterogeneity, patch The Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and area, patch isolation, edge effect, SLOSS Systematics is online at ecolsys.annualreviews.org https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110316- Abstract 022612 For this article, I reviewed empirical studies finding significant ecological Copyright c 2017 by Annual Reviews. responses to habitat fragmentation per se—in other words, significant re- All rights reserved sponses to fragmentation independent of the effects of habitat amount (here- after referred to as habitat fragmentation). I asked these two questions: Are most significant responses to habitat fragmentation negative or positive? And do particular attributes of species or landscapes lead to a predominance of negative or positive significant responses? I found 118 studies reporting ANNUAL REVIEWS Further 381 significant responses to habitat fragmentation independent of habitat Click here to view this article's amount. Of these responses, 76% were positive. Most significant fragmen- online features: • Download figures as PPT slides tation effects were positive, irrespective of how the authors controlled for • Navigate linked references • Download citations habitat amount, the measure of fragmentation, the taxonomic group, the type • Explore related articles • Search keywords of response variable, or the degree of specialization or conservation status of the species or species group.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Review 12-04 December 2012
    The North American Model of Wildlife Conservation Technical Review 12-04 December 2012 1 The North American Model of Wildlife Conservation The Wildlife Society and The Boone and Crockett Club Technical Review 12-04 - December 2012 Citation Organ, J.F., V. Geist, S.P. Mahoney, S. Williams, P.R. Krausman, G.R. Batcheller, T.A. Decker, R. Carmichael, P. Nanjappa, R. Regan, R.A. Medellin, R. Cantu, R.E. McCabe, S. Craven, G.M. Vecellio, and D.J. Decker. 2012. The North American Model of Wildlife Conservation. The Wildlife Society Technical Review 12-04. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. Series Edited by Theodore A. Bookhout Copy Edit and Design Terra Rentz (AWB®), Managing Editor, The Wildlife Society Lisa Moore, Associate Editor, The Wildlife Society Maja Smith, Graphic Designer, MajaDesign, Inc. Cover Images Front cover, clockwise from upper left: 1) Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) kittens removed from den for marking and data collection as part of a long-term research study. Credit: John F. Organ; 2) A mixed flock of ducks and geese fly from a wetland area. Credit: Steve Hillebrand/USFWS; 3) A researcher attaches a radio transmitter to a short-horned lizard (Phrynosoma hernandesi) in Colorado’s Pawnee National Grassland. Credit: Laura Martin; 4) Rifle hunter Ron Jolly admires a mature white-tailed buck harvested by his wife on the family’s farm in Alabama. Credit: Tes Randle Jolly; 5) Caribou running along a northern peninsula of Newfoundland are part of a herd compositional survey. Credit: John F. Organ; 6) Wildlife veterinarian Lisa Wolfe assesses a captive mule deer during studies of density dependence in Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • A Robust Goal Is Needed for Species in the Post‐2020 Global Biodiversity
    Received: 16 April 2020 Revised: 3 September 2020 Accepted: 4 November 2020 DOI: 10.1111/conl.12778 POLICY PERSPECTIVE A robust goal is needed for species in the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework Brooke A. Williams1,2 James E.M. Watson1,2,3 Stuart H.M. Butchart4,5 Michelle Ward1,2 Thomas M. Brooks6,7,8 Nathalie Butt1,2 Friederike C. Bolam9 Simon N. Stuart10,11 Louise Mair9 Philip J. K. McGowan9 Richard Gregory12,13 Craig Hilton-Taylor14 David Mallon15 Ian Harrison6,16 Jeremy S. Simmonds1,2 1 School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia 2 Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia 3 Wildlife Conservation Society, Global Conservation Program, Bronx, New York 4 BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK 5 Department of Zoology, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK 6 IUCN, Gland, Switzerland 7 World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF), University of the Philippines Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines 8 Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia 9 School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK 10 Synchronicity Earth, London, UK 11 A Rocha International, London, UK 12 RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire, UK 13 Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, Centre for Biodiversity & Environment Research, University College London, London, UK 14 IUCN, Cambridge, UK 15 Division of Biology and Conservation Ecology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK 16 Conservation International, Arlington, Virginia Correspondence Brooke Williams, School of Earth and Abstract Environmental Sciences, University of In 2010, Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) adopted the Queensland, St Lucia 4072, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Leone Biodiversity Country Study
    National Biodiversity Report TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION II. BACKGROUND TO THE SIERRA LEONE BIODIVERSITY COUNTRY STUDY A. Introduction B. Status and Trends of Components of Biodiversity C. The value of the Biodiversity of Sierra Leone D. Major Threats to Biodiversity in Sierra Leone E. Legal and Policy Frameworks for Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use F. Institutional Responsibilities and Capacities G. Institutional Arrangements for the Implementation of Strategic Recommendations III. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES A. The Overall Vision B. Goals and Strategic Objectives C. Sector Specific Conservation Goals and Objectives IV. THE NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY A. Introduction B. Summary of Thematic (sectoral) Strategies C. Summary of General Measures (Cross-cutting Strategies) V. COLLABORATION AND PARTNERSHIP i VI. THE ACTION PLAN A. Introduction B. Thematic Action Plans C. Cross-sectoral Action Plan D. Schedule of Implementation E. The Budget F. Monitoring and Evaluation VII. SHARING OF NATIONAL EXPERIENCE ANNEX NBSAP IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE REFERENCES ii LIST OF ABBREVIATION AND ACRONYMS ADB - African Development Bank AFRC - Armed Forces Revolutionary Council BSAP - Biodiversity Strategy Action Plan CBD - Convention on Biological Diversity CCD - Convention to Combat Desertification CHESIL - Council for Human Ecology of Sierra Leone CILSS - Convention Establishing a Permanent Inter-State Committee for the Control of Draught in the Sahel CITES - Convention on International Trade
    [Show full text]
  • 9.5 Borough of Hawthorne
    Section 9.5 - Borough of Hawthorne 9.5 BOROUGH OF HAWTHORNE This section presents the jurisdictional annex for the Borough of Hawthorne. The annex includes a general overview of the Borough; an assessment of the Borough of Hawthorne’s risk, vulnerability, and mitigation capabilities; and a prioritized action plan to implement prior to a disaster to reduce future losses and achieve greater resilience to natural hazards. 9.5.1 Hazard Mitigation Planning Team The following individuals are the Borough of Hawthorne’s identified HMP update primary and alternate points of contact and NFIP Floodplain Administrator. Table 9.5-1. Hazard Mitigation Planning Team Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact Richard McAuliffe, OEM Coordinator Brian Vanderhook, Deputy OEM Coordinator 445 Lafayette Ave., Hawthorne, NJ 445 Lafayette Ave., Hawthorne, NJ 973-427-1800 973-427-1800 [email protected] [email protected] NFIP Floodplain Administrator Richard Stewen, Building Official 445 Lafayette Ave., Hawthorne, NJ 973-304-2058 [email protected] 9.5.2 Jurisdiction Profile Once inhabited by the Lenni-Lenape Indians, also known as the Delaware, Hawthorne was settled in the 1700s by Dutch immigrants who were to become the borough's pioneer farmers. This settlement was first part of Manchester Township, a region that was later separated into Hawthorne, Haledon, North Haledon, Prospect Park, Totowa and most of the First Ward of Paterson. The municipality was incorporated by an act of the New Jersey Legislature on March 24, 1898. Since 1990, the Borough of Hawthorne has operated under a Mayor – Council form of government, as authorized by the State of New Jersey's Faulkner Act with a charter approved by the local voters.
    [Show full text]
  • Passaic County Superintendent of Schools' Office
    GENERAL INFORMATION PASSAIC COUNTY CODE: 31 SCHOOL DISTRICTS: 21 CHARTER SCHOOLS: 8 PRIVATE SCHOOLS FOR THE DISABLED 9 (NJDOE APPROVED): BLOOMINGDALE PREK-8 P.C. TECHNICAL INSTITUTE 9-12 CLIFTON PREK-12 PASSAIC VALLEY REGIONAL H.S. DISTRICT 9-12 CLASSICAL CS OF CLIFTON ** 6-8 PATERSON PREK-12 COLLEGE ACHIEVE CS OF PATERSON** K-8 (NO 4TH) PATERSON ARTS & SCIENCE CS ** K-9 COMMUNITY CS OF PATERSON** K-8 PATERSON CS FOR SCIENCE & TECH. ** K-12 HALEDON PREK-8 PHILIPS CS OF PATERSON ** K-3 HAWTHORNE K-12 POMPTON LAKES K-12 JOHN P. HOLLAND CS ** PREK-8 PROSPECT PARK PREK-8 LAKELAND 9-12 RINGWOOD K-8 LITTLE FALLS K-8 TOTOWA K-8 NORTH HALEDON K-8 WANAQUE K-8 NORTHERN REG. ED. SERVICES COMM. 9-12 WAYNE PREK-12 PASSAIC PREK-12 WEST MILFORD K-12 PASSAIC ARTS & SCIENCE CS ** K-12 WOODLAND PARK K-8 P.C. MANCHESTER REGIONAL H.S. 9-12 ** DENOTES CHARTER SCHOOLS - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # RESPONSIBILITIES – EXECUTIVE COUNTY SUPT. OF SCHOOLS’ OFFICE……………………………………..………………………………… 4 PASSAIC COUNTY OFFICE/OFFICE OF COMPREHENSIVE SUPPORT….…………………………………………………………………………. 5 N.J. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION………………………………………………......................... 6 PASSAIC COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS…………………………………………………………….……….......................... 7 NORTH JERSEY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION…………………………………………………………………………….……………………………….. 7 PASSAIC COUNTY CAMP HOPE COMMISSION………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 7 WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD OF PASSAIC COUNTY………….……………………………................................................ 7 COUNTY INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION (BERKELEY, PCCC, WPU)……………………………….................................... 8 PASSAIC COUNTY LEGISLATORS……………………………………………………………............................................................... 9 THE EDUCATIONAL COUNCIL OF PASSAIC COUNTY………………………………………………………….…………………………………….. 10 PASSAIC COUNTY ASSOCIATIONS………………………………………………………………………...…………………………………………. 11 P.C. Association of School Administrators P.C. Education Association P.C. Association of School Business Officials P.C.
    [Show full text]