<<

Lisa Larrimore – 111

Mercury and the Relativistic Correction for Precession of the Apsides

We have seen that the of the planets around the can be found, to a good approximation, by only considering a two-body system (a planet and the sun) interacting through a central . However, all the other planets cause slight variations in the predicted path of an individual planet.

Astronomers have been able to calculate the expected precession of ’s apsides (due to the of other planets) to be 531 arcseconds per century, and they have observed that the actual precession is 574 arcseconds per century. This leaves a difference of 43" that could not be explained by uncertainties in calculation or measurement and which was noticed as early as 1845.

Before Einstein’s , there were three unsatisfactory theories to explain this phenomenon: a retarding force due to a dust cloud around the sun, a new planet between Mercury and the sun, and an exponent slightly different from -2 in the gravitational force law. Then Einstein modified the force law by introducing a component that varies as 1/r4.

We will use this correction to calculate the angle D through which the apsides of Mercury shift with each revolution, ignoring the effects of other planets, as shown here in the exaggerated figure.

Using the substitution r = 1/u, we can write the equation of motion given in Eq. 8.21 as

d 2 u m 1 + u = - F(1/ u) , dq2 l 2 u 2 where the gravitational force with the relativistic correction is given by

GmM 3GM ×l 2 3GM ×l 2 F = - - = -GmMu 2 - u 4 . r 2 mc2 r 4 mc2

Making the substitutions

1 Gm 2 M 3GM º , d º a l 2 c2 we have

d 2u 1 + u = + du 2 . (1) dq2 a

Though we cannot solve this differential equation exactly, we can use a successive approximation procedure to get an approximate analytic solution. First we ignore the relativistic term du2, giving us the familiar solution

1 u = (1+ e cos q) . 1 a

Substituting u1 into the right side of Eq. 1, we have

d 2 u 1 d é e 2 ù + u = + 1+ 2e cos q + (1+ cos 2q) . (2) 2 2 ê ú dq a a ëê 2 ûú

Substituting u1 into the left side of Eq. 1 only gives the 1/a term, and it turns out that substituting

d éæ e 2 ö e 2 ù u = êç1+ ÷ + eqsin q - cos 2qú p 2 ç ÷ a ëêè 2 ø 6 ûú into the left side of Eq. 1 generates the remainder of Eq. 2, as you can verify with a little calculus and algebra.

If we stop the successive approximation procedure at this point, we have

é 1 de ù é d æ e 2 ö de 2 ù u @ u = u + u = (1+ e cos q) + qsin q + ê ç1+ ÷ - cos 2qú . 2 1 p ê 2 ú 2 ç ÷ 2 ëa a û ëêa è 2 ø 6a ûú

The second bracketed term contains a constant and a small periodic disturbance, whereas the qsinq term produces secular effects, so

1 é de ù 1 é æ d öù usec ular = ê1+ ecos q + qsin qú @ ê1+ e cosçq - q÷ú , (3) a ë a û a ë è a øû where we have used the approximations

d d d cos q @ 1, sin q @ q . a a a

In choosing u1, we chose to measure q from the perihelion distance (rmin = umax) at t = 0, so the next perihelion will occur when the argument of the cosine term in Eq. 3 is 2p. Thus,

2p æ d ö q = @ 2pç1+ ÷ . 1- (d / a) è a ø

So the relativistic term in the force law causes a displacement of perihelion (and thus the aphelion) in each revolution by 2 2pd æ GmM ö 6pGM D @ = 6pç ÷ @ , a è cl ø ac 2 (1- e 2 ) making the approximation m @ m in the last step. Since Mercury is the planet with the smallest a and largest e, this effect is most noticeable. To calculate this, we put in lots of constants and get

6p(rad/ rev) 6.6726×10 -11 ×m3 / s 2 kg 333480×5.976×1024 ×kg D = ( )( ) = 5.0249×10 -7 ×rad/ rev 2 (0.3871×1.495×1011 ×m)(3×108 m/ s) (1- 0.20562 )

-7 æ180×deg öæ 3600×arcsec öæ 1×rev öæ 100× yr ö = (5.0249×10 ×rad/ rev)ç ÷ç ÷ç ÷ç ÷ @ 43×arcsec/ century , è p×rad øè deg øè 0.2408× yr øè1×century ø which was the unexplained precession of Mercury’s apsides!