TRUFFAUT. Rope Was ALFRED HITCHCOCK
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
"Sounds Like a Spy Story": the Espionage Thrillers of Alfred
University of Mary Washington Eagle Scholar Student Research Submissions 4-29-2016 "Sounds Like a Spy Story": The Espionage Thrillers of Alfred Hitchcock in Twentieth-Century English and American Society, from The Man Who Knew Too Much (1934) to Topaz (1969) Kimberly M. Humphries Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.umw.edu/student_research Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Humphries, Kimberly M., ""Sounds Like a Spy Story": The Espionage Thrillers of Alfred Hitchcock in Twentieth-Century English and American Society, from The Man Who Knew Too Much (1934) to Topaz (1969)" (2016). Student Research Submissions. 47. https://scholar.umw.edu/student_research/47 This Honors Project is brought to you for free and open access by Eagle Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Research Submissions by an authorized administrator of Eagle Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "SOUNDS LIKE A SPY STORY": THE ESPIONAGE THRILLERS OF ALFRED HITCHCOCK IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY ENGLISH AND AMERICAN SOCIETY, FROM THE MAN WHO KNEW TOO MUCH (1934) TO TOPAZ (1969) An honors paper submitted to the Department of History and American Studies of the University of Mary Washington in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Departmental Honors Kimberly M Humphries April 2016 By signing your name below, you affirm that this work is the complete and final version of your paper submitted in partial fulfillment of a degree from the University of Mary Washington. You affirm the University of Mary Washington honor pledge: "I hereby declare upon my word of honor that I have neither given nor received unauthorized help on this work." Kimberly M. -
Pocket Edition!
Matthew Brannon matthew brannon As the literary form of the new bourgeoisie, the biography is a sign of escape, or, to be more precise, of evasion. In order not to expose themselves through insights that question the very existence of the bourgeoisie, writers of biographies remain, as if up against a wall, at the threshold to which they have been pushed by world events. - SIGFRIED KRACAUER, The Biography as an Art Form of the New Bourgeoisie, 1930 in The Mass Ornament: Weimar Essays, Oxford University Press, 2002 Call yourself an actor? You’re not even a bad actor. You can’t act at all, you fucking stupid hopeless sniveling little cunt-faced cunty fucking shit-faced arse-hole… - LAURENCE OLIVIER to Laurence Havery from Robert Stephen’s Knight Errant: Memoirs of a Vagabond Actor, Hodder and Stoughton, 1995 In show business, it’s folly to talk about what the future holds. Things change so fast. Today’s project so easily becomes tomorrow’s disappointment… The world of the film star is an obstacle race against time. The pitfalls and wrong turnings you can make are devastating. Often I fear for the sanity of some of my friends… The dice are loaded against you. There’s so much bitchery around, you really have to fight hard to survive. Everybody is against you… you have to fight for… success, sell your soul for it even. And when one finally achieved success, it was resented. Not by the great stars like Frank Sinatra, but by the little, frustrated people. They’re the ones to look out for, because brother, they’re gunning for you. -
Text Pages Layout MCBEAN.Indd
Introduction The great photographer Angus McBean has stage performers of this era an enduring power been celebrated over the past fifty years chiefly that carried far beyond the confines of their for his romantic portraiture and playful use of playhouses. surrealism. There is some reason. He iconised Certainly, in a single session with a Yankee Vivien Leigh fully three years before she became Cleopatra in 1945, he transformed the image of Scarlett O’Hara and his most breathtaking image Stratford overnight, conjuring from the Prospero’s was adapted for her first appearance in Gone cell of his small Covent Garden studio the dazzle with the Wind. He lit the touchpaper for Audrey of the West End into the West Midlands. (It is Hepburn’s career when he picked her out of a significant that the then Shakespeare Memorial chorus line and half-buried her in a fake desert Theatre began transferring its productions to advertise sun-lotion. Moreover he so pleased to London shortly afterwards.) In succeeding The Beatles when they came to his studio that seasons, acknowledged since as the Stratford he went on to immortalise them on their first stage’s ‘renaissance’, his black-and-white magic LP cover as four mop-top gods smiling down continued to endow this rebirth with a glamour from a glass Olympus that was actually just a that was crucial in its further rise to not just stairwell in Soho. national but international pre-eminence. However, McBean (the name is pronounced Even as his photographs were created, to rhyme with thane) also revolutionised British McBean’s Shakespeare became ubiquitous. -
Shakespeare on Film, Video & Stage
William Shakespeare on Film, Video and Stage Titles in bold red font with an asterisk (*) represent the crème de la crème – first choice titles in each category. These are the titles you’ll probably want to explore first. Titles in bold black font are the second- tier – outstanding films that are the next level of artistry and craftsmanship. Once you have experienced the top tier, these are where you should go next. They may not represent the highest achievement in each genre, but they are definitely a cut above the rest. Finally, the titles which are in a regular black font constitute the rest of the films within the genre. I would be the first to admit that some of these may actually be worthy of being “ranked” more highly, but it is a ridiculously subjective matter. Bibliography Shakespeare on Silent Film Robert Hamilton Ball, Theatre Arts Books, 1968. (Reissued by Routledge, 2016.) Shakespeare and the Film Roger Manvell, Praeger, 1971. Shakespeare on Film Jack J. Jorgens, Indiana University Press, 1977. Shakespeare on Television: An Anthology of Essays and Reviews J.C. Bulman, H.R. Coursen, eds., UPNE, 1988. The BBC Shakespeare Plays: Making the Televised Canon Susan Willis, The University of North Carolina Press, 1991. Shakespeare on Screen: An International Filmography and Videography Kenneth S. Rothwell, Neil Schuman Pub., 1991. Still in Movement: Shakespeare on Screen Lorne M. Buchman, Oxford University Press, 1991. Shakespeare Observed: Studies in Performance on Stage and Screen Samuel Crowl, Ohio University Press, 1992. Shakespeare and the Moving Image: The Plays on Film and Television Anthony Davies & Stanley Wells, eds., Cambridge University Press, 1994. -
“Revenge in Shakespeare's Plays”
“REVENGE IN SHAKESPEARE’S PLAYS” “MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING” – LECTURE/CLASS WRITTEN: In the second half of 1598 or 99 -- no later because the role of Dogberry was sometimes replaced by the name of “Will Kemp”, the actor who always played the role; Kemp left the Lord Chamberlain’s Men in 1599. AGE: 34-35 Years Old (B.1564-D.1616) CHRONO: Seventh in the line of Comedies after “The Two Gentlemen of Verona”, “The Comedy of Errors”, “Taming of the Shrew”, “Love’s Labours Lost”, “A Midsummer’s Night’s Dream”, “The Merchant of Venice”. QUARTO: A Quarto edition of the play appeared in 1600. GENRE: “Tragicomic” SOURCE: “Completely and entirely unhistorical” VERSION: The play is “Shakespeare’s earliest version of the more serious story of the man who mistakenly believes his partner has been unfaithful to him”. (“Othello” for one.) SUCCESS: There are no records of early performances but there are “allusions to its success.” HIGHLIGHT: The comedy was revived in 1613 for a Court performance at Whitehall before King James, his daughter Princess Elizabeth and her new husband in May 1613. AFTER: Oddly, the play was “performed only sporadically until David Garrick’s acclaimed revival in 1748”. CRITICS: 1891 – A.B. Walkley: “a composite picture of the multifarious, seething, fermenting life, the polychromatic phantasmagoria of the Renaissance.” 1905 – George Bernard Shaw: “a hopeless story, pleasing only to lovers of the illustrated police papers BENEDICTS: Anthony Quayle, John Gielgud, Michael Redgrave, Donald Sinden BEATRICES: Peggy Ashcroft, Margaret Leighton, Judi Dench, Maggie Smith RECENT: There was “a boost in recent fortunes with the well-received 1993 film version directed by Kenneth Branagh and starring Branagh and Emma Thompson.” SETTING: Messina in northeastern Sicily at the narrow strait separating Sicily from Italy. -
Fear, Confusion and Stage Fright
Film-Philosophy 11.1 June 2007 Hitchcock and Hume Revisited: Fear, Confusion and Stage Fright John Orr University of Edinburgh This essay is a return to the scene of a crime. In my recent book on Hitchcock (Orr 2005, 26- 52) I made an outrageously general argument for the affinity between Hitch’s narratives and David Hume’s reasoning about human nature. For something so speculative, you expect cracks to appear pretty soon. But my impulse since the book’s appearance has not been to feel I exaggerated – which I’m sure I did – but to sense that I did not go far enough. There was more to be said about this oblique, long distance liaison down the centuries and I now feel it best said through a film which I had not discussed at all, partly because I shared the general feeling that this was not one of Hitch’s most auspicious films. The acting was uneven, the tone whimsical, the plot often cluttered and it suffered, or so I thought, from that general uncertainty of touch that sometimes characterised Hitchcock’s return to England. But then again his short wartime film Bon Voyage (1944) has been underestimated, as were in different ways Under Capricorn (1949), the remade The Man Who Knew Too Much (1956) and later Frenzy (1972). As Michael Walker has pointed out (1999: 199-202), Stage Fright (1950) has a structural complexity, a narrative coherence and a textual density missing from his 1930s films like Young And Innocent (1937). In other words, it brings back to London in 1950 the innovating aspects of Hitchcock’s Hollywood aesthetic of the 1940s. -
Hitchcock in the Forties Marshall Deutelbaum, Coordinator and Presenter
WALLA Spring, 2015 Hitchcock in the Forties Marshall Deutelbaum, Coordinator and Presenter Rope (Transatlantic Pictures / Warner Bros., 1948) 81 min. James Stewart (Rupert Cadell); John Dall (Brandon Shaw); Farley Granger (Phillip Morgan); Dick Hogan (David Kentley); Sir Cedric Hardwicke (Mr. Henry Kentley); Constance Collier (Mrs. Anita Atwater); Douglas Dick (Kenneth Lawrence); Joan Chandler (Janet Walker). Hitchcock’s Rope, based on Patrick Hamilton’s play of 1929, “Rope’s End,” was the first production of the company formed by Hitchcock and Sidney Bernstein. Initially adapted by Hume Cronin, Arthur Laurents wrote the final script, Americanizing the English play which was thought to have been based most likely on the kidnapping and thrill murder in Chicago some five years earlier of 14 year old Bobby Franks by Nathan Leopold, Jr. and Richard Loeb. Rather than simply a thrill killing, Brandon Shaw and Phillip Morgan murder David Kentley at the beginning of the film as an intellectual exercise in Nietzschean philosophy as taught to them by Rupert Cadell. To satisfy the censorial demands of the Production Code, the homosexual relationship between Brandon and Phillip is never explicitly mentioned, though it remains a subtext in the drama. Rope is Hitchcock’s most experimental film. Restricted after the opening shot to a single set, it mostly consists of unedited long takes lasting as long as ten minutes. To create the illusion that the film is unedited, Hitchcock hid the few moments where one long take is edited to the next by moving the camera into a close-up of a man’s dark jacket or some other object in order to black out the screen momentarily during the change of shot. -
THE DARK PAGES the Newsletter for Film Noir Lovers Vol
THE DARK PAGES The Newsletter for Film Noir Lovers Vol. 6, Number 1 SPECIAL SUPER-SIZED ISSUE!! January/February 2010 From Sheet to Celluloid: The Maltese Falcon by Karen Burroughs Hannsberry s I read The Maltese Falcon, by Dashiell Hammett, I decide on who will be the “fall guy” for the murders of Thursby Aactually found myself flipping more than once to check and Archer. As in the book, the film depicts Gutman giving Spade the copyright, certain that the book couldn’t have preceded the an envelope containing 10 one-thousand dollar bills as a payment 1941 film, so closely did the screenplay follow the words I was for the black bird, and Spade hands it over to Brigid for safe reading. But, to be sure, the Hammett novel was written in 1930, keeping. But when Brigid heads for the kitchen to make coffee and the 1941 film was the third of three features based on the and Gutman suggests that she leave the cash-filled envelope, he book. (The first, released in 1931, starred Ricardo Cortez and announces that it now only contains $900. Spade immediately Bebe Daniels, and the second, the 1936 film, Satan Met a Lady, deduces that Gutman palmed one of the bills and threatens to was a light comedy with Warren William and Bette Davis.) “frisk” him until the fat man admits that Spade is correct. But For my money, and for most noirists, the 94 version is the a far different scene played out in the book where, when the definitive adaptation. missing bill is announced, Spade ushers Brigid The 1941 film starred Humphrey Bogart into the bathroom and orders her to strip naked as private detective Sam Spade, along with to prove her innocence. -
Delta Sigma Pi Installs Chapter at Wake Forest College
OF DELTA SIGMA PI MAY 1950 WAIT HALL, The Administration Building of Wake Forest College in Wake Forest, North Carolina where our Gamma Nu Chapter was installed on April I, 1950. THE INTERNATIONAL FRATERNITY OF DELTA SIGMA PI Professional Commerce and Business Administration Fraternity Delta Sigma Pi was founded at New York University, School of Commerce, Accounts and Finance, on November 7, 1907, by Alexander F. Makay, Alfred Moysello, Harold V. Jacobs and H. Albert Tienken. Delta Sigma Pi is a professional fraternity organized to foster the study of business in universities; to encourage scholarship, social ac~ivity and the associa tion of students for their mutual advancement by research and practice; to promote closer affiliation between the commercial world and students of commerce; and to further a high standard of commercial ethics and culture, and the civic and commercial welfare of the com munity. The Central Office 222 W. Adams Street, Chicago 6, Illinois. Telephone: Randolph 6-6954 H. G. WRIGHT, GRAND SECRETARY-TREASURER ....•.. J. D. THOMSON, AssisTANT GRAND SECRETARY-TREASURER The Grand Council Grand President: WALTER C. SEHM, Alpha Epsilon, Minnesota ...................... 490 N. Snelling Ave., St. Paul4, Minn. Grand Secretary-Treasurer : H. G. WRIGHT, Beta, Northwestern .......................... 222 W. Adams St., Chicago 6, Ill. Eastern Region: J. HARRY FELTHAM, Chi, Johns Hopkins .......................... Robert Garrett & Sons, Baltimore 3, Mel. Southeastern Region: H. CLYDE KITCHENS, Kappa, Georgia (Atlanta) ................... 915 Rosedale Rd. N.E., Atlanta, Ga. Central Region: JoHN F. MEE, Nu, Ohio State .............. ....................... Indiana University, Bloomington, Ind. Midwestern Region: HENRY C. LuCAS, Alpha Delta, Nebraska ................ 1414 First National Bank Bldg., Omaha, Neb. -
Under Capricorn Simpson, Helen (1897-1940)
Under Capricorn Simpson, Helen (1897-1940) A digital text sponsored by Australian Literature Gateway University of Sydney Library Sydney 2003 http://purl.library.usyd.edu.au/setis/id/simunde © University of Sydney Library. The texts and images are not to be used for commercial purposes without permission Source Text: Prepared from the print edition published by Macmillan New York 1938 305pp. All quotation marks are retained as data. First Published: 1937 A823.91/S6131/J4/1 Australian Etext Collections at women writers novels 1910-1939 Under Capricorn New York Macmillan 1938 Book I. I have read that Capricornus, the heavenly Goat, being ascendant at nativitie, denieth honour to persons of quality, and esteeme to the Vulgar. Can a Starre do so by onlie shineing on a Woman in her pangs? Shall Capricornus bind a poore man the world ouer, no part, no Land undiscouered, where hee may shake free? I will not belieue it: nor that Honour (not forfeit) can be for euer hidd by decree of this distemperate Starre. A Limbo For Ladies. (i) THE year, eighteen hundred and thirty-one. The place, Sydney; a city whose streets were first laid by men in chains for the easier progress of the soldiers who guarded them. This city, growing slowly about a population of convicts and soldiers, had at that date no very penitential air. The harbour water, lively with sun; the many windmills, leisurely bestirring themselves; the ships at anchor, hung with marine laundry, ensigns trailing; the smoke of domestic chimneys: all these things contrived to lend Sydney an air of expectancy rather than despair. -
Mailcall No. 2408 March 3, 2019
517th Parachute Regimental Combat Team MailCall No. 2408 March 3, 2019 517th Parachute Infantry Regiment 460th Parachute Field Artillery Battalion 596th Parachute Combat Engineer Company MailCall News Subject: 1ST BN 517 3 foot long photo. Bob, I was at the Show of Shows National gun show in Louisville Ky. and saw a 3 ft. long picture of the 1st Bn. with probably all of the officers, Bill Boyle included. I would guess it was taken in Camp McCall. I have the name and phone number of the vendor who had it, so I don't know what the Mail Call rules about things like this, but thought I would throw it out, and see what you think. The price was $900.00 dollars, so that seems awfully pricey to me. Thanks, Morris McDowell Interesting. I do have a copy of a photo on the website that is identified as HQ Company 1st Battalion. Is this the same photo? This copy was sent to us by Cotton Nelson, son of PFC Gerald Nelson, HQ/1 See full-size at: http://517prct.org/photos/hq1_dress.htm I do recognize Bill Boyle in the front row, in front of the 3rd group of 4. Although this is identified as HQ Company, I think this must be the whole 1st Battalion, with HQ Company, plus Companies A, B, and C. I see each of the 4 groups has about 12 men across x 6 rows = 72 men plus officers. According to Wikipedia, “A company will have 80-150 men, typically run by a Captain or Major, whereas a Battalion has 300-800 and is led by a Lt. -
Print This Article
Strangers No More: The Initial Hitchcock Murder Vlad DIMA Union College, [email protected] Special Issue: 1 (2011) | ISSN 2158-8724 (online) | DOI 10.5195/cinej.2011.1 | http://cinej.pitt.edu Abstract This article analyzes the various levels of violence and graphic detail in the initial Hitchcock murder scenes. Through a detailed close reading of these scenes from Blackmail, Strangers on a Train, and Frenzy, I expose the different and increasing levels of intensity at which sadism functions throughout Hitchcock’s career, and I suggest that the audience is stuck at a one-stage sadistic level as opposed to the typical Freudian model. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press. Strangers no More: The Initial Hitchcock Murder If we compare murder scenes from distinct periods in Alfred Hitchcock’s oeuvre, we find a sharp gradation in the intensity of visual depiction from the first talkie, Blackmail (1929), to Strangers on a Train (1951), and to his penultimate film, Frenzy (1972), which essentially marks the end of the director’s career.1 We go from a long shot of curtains that hide the murder in the first film, to a paradoxical close-up of glasses with a small vignette reflection of the murder in the second, and we end with close-ups of the actual people, both the victim and the aggressor, in the third film.