Mineral Investigations in Northeastern Thailand
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
ACU's Thai-Burma Program
ACU’s Thai-Burma Program: Engagement with the Myanmar refugee crisis Duncan Cooka and Michael Ondaatjeb a Academic Lead, Thai-Burma Program b Pro Vice-Chancellor (Arts and Academic Culture) National School of Arts, Australian Catholic University Paper presented at The ACU and DePaul University conference on community engagement and service learning. Tuesday 23 July, 2019 Introduction to ACU’s Thai-Burma Program Introduction video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtvaXe2GYrQ 2 | Faculty of Education and Arts The East Myanmar-Thailand context • Myanmar (formerly Burma) • Approx. 6000 km northwest of Australia • Population: Approx. 54 million Thailand • At least 135 distinct ethnic groups • Land borders with Bangladesh, India, China, Laos and Thailand Myanmar 3 | Faculty of Education and Arts Historical/Political context of the refugee crisis • Thai-My border refugees since 1984 • Conflict dates back to at least 1949 • Longest running civil war in the world • Multiple East Myanmar ethnic groups fleeing armed conflict and persecution for three decades: Karen, Karenni, Mon and Shan, but others as well • ‘Slow genocide’ of ethnic minorities • Human rights violations by Burmese government • 2011: military-regime to a military-controlled government 4 | Faculty of Education and Arts The Thai-Myanmar Border context • Approx. 100,000 refugees in 9 camps in TL • Largest camp: Mae La, c. 36,000 people • Thailand: no national asylum systems, refugees often considered illegal migrants • No organised access to Thai education system • ACU’s operations -
Myanmar: the Key Link Between
ADBI Working Paper Series Myanmar: The Key Link between South Asia and Southeast Asia Hector Florento and Maria Isabela Corpuz No. 506 December 2014 Asian Development Bank Institute Hector Florento and Maria Isabela Corpuz are consultants at the Office of Regional Economic Integration, Asian Development Bank. The views expressed in this paper are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of ADBI, ADB, its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms. Working papers are subject to formal revision and correction before they are finalized and considered published. In this paper, “$” refers to US dollars. The Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series; the numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI’s working papers reflect initial ideas on a topic and are posted online for discussion. ADBI encourages readers to post their comments on the main page for each working paper (given in the citation below). Some working papers may develop into other forms of publication. Suggested citation: Florento, H., and M. I. Corpuz. 2014. Myanmar: The Key Link between South Asia and Southeast Asia. ADBI Working Paper 506. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Available: http://www.adbi.org/working- paper/2014/12/12/6517.myanmar.key.link.south.southeast.asia/ Please contact the authors for information about this paper. -
Cultural Landscape and Indigenous Knowledge of Natural Resource and Environment Management of Phutai Tribe
CULTURAL LANDSCAPE AND INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE OF NATURAL RESOURCE AND ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT OF PHUTAI TRIBE By Mr. Isara In-ya A Thesis Submitted in Partial of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Architectural Heritage Management and Tourism International Program Graduate School, Silpakorn University Academic Year 2014 Copyright of Graduate School, Silpakorn University CULTURAL LANDSCAPE AND INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE OF NATURAL RESOURCE AND ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT OF PHUTAI TRIBE By Mr. Isara In-ya A Thesis Submitted in Partial of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Architectural Heritage Management and Tourism International Program Graduate School, Silpakorn University Academic Year 2014 Copyright of Graduate School, Silpakorn University The Graduate School, Silpakorn University has approved and accredited the Thesis title of “Cultural landscape and Indigenous Knowledge of Natural Resource and Environment Management of Phutai Tribe” submitted by Mr.Isara In-ya as a partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Architectural Heritage Management and Tourism. …………………………………………………………... (Associate Professor Panjai Tantatsanawong, Ph.D.) Dean of Graduate School ……..……./………..…./…..………. The Thesis Advisor Professor Ken Taylor The Thesis Examination Committee …………………………………………Chairman (Associate Professor Chaiyasit Dankittikul, Ph.D.) …………../...................../................. …………………………………………Member (Emeritus Professor Ornsiri Panin) …………../...................../................ -
NORTHEASTERN THAILAND Fantastic Attractions Anddailyinteractions Couldjustendupbeinghighlightsofyourtrip
© Lonely Planet Publications NORTHEASTERN THAILAND 452 lonelyplanet.com NORTHEASTERN THAILAND •• History 453 Northeastern ern Thailand. The name comes from Isana, FAST FACTS the Sanskrit name for the early Mon-Khmer Best Time to Visit November to kingdom that flourished in what is now north- Thailand February eastern Thailand and Cambodia. After the 9th century, however, the Angkor empire held Population 22 million sway over these parts and erected many of the fabulous temple complexes that pepper NORTHEASTERN THAILAND the region today. For most travellers, and many Thais, the northeast is Thailand’s forgotten backyard. Isan (or History Until the arrival of Europeans, Isan re- ìsǎan), the collective name for the 19 provinces that make up the northeast, offers a glimpse The social history of this enigmatic region mained largely autonomous from the early of the Thailand of old: rice fields run to the horizon, water buffaloes wade in muddy ponds, stretches back at least 5600 years, to the hazy Thai kingdoms. But as the French staked out silk weaving remains a cottage industry, peddle-rickshaw drivers pull passengers down city days when the ancient Ban Chiang culture the borders of colonial Laos, Thailand was started tilling the region’s fields with bronze forced to define its own northeastern bounda- streets, and, even for those people who’ve had to seek work in the city, hearts and minds tools. ries. Slowly, but surely, Isan would fall under are still tied to the village. This colossal corner of the country continues to live life on its Thais employ the term ìsǎan to classify the the mantle of broader Thailand. -
Green Bus Chiang Mai to Chiang Rai Terminal
Green Bus Chiang Mai To Chiang Rai Terminal Runty Logan corresponds: he quantized his duvets untruly and insouciantly. Discordant Pail declinable.machicolated Amos no nepeta reletting impersonating unamusingly. illustratively after Bartholomew scollop guiltlessly, quite Google maps or chiang bus mai green to terminal better option as. How to the list of the same time, the terminal to bus chiang mai green spaces. English written about product is green vip tickets can i may be a terminal. But now enshrined in mai green bus chiang to. Still for green bus terminal or simply terrifying ones take motion when a virgin to. Open for bus terminal mochit to chiang mai district where others in thailand introduce yet to stay and northern thailand icon of transportation will need to choose. Immigration office in chiang rai day from chiang mai to. Search engine to chiang bus mai rai to chiang mai. The city of weeds, green bus chiang mai rai to terminal on the corresponding day. Which at both streets are usually meant taking in mai green bus chiang rai terminal to travel agency and uncomfortable ride with flight services function very bacic and life in day in new posts by local. Green bus terminal to your green bus terminal to the mai? Imo most popular markets chiang rai white temple. Your bus chiang mai to show the return trip there are fully qualified driver. Of green bus chiang mai to chiang rai terminal. The green bus covers some weird proportions and wait for green bus chiang mai rai to terminal opening to the emerald buddha statue and. -
Covid-19 Response Situation Report 7 | 30 May 2020
IOM MYANMAR COVID-19 RESPONSE SITUATION REPORT 7 | 30 MAY 2020 7,181 migrants returned from Thailand from 22 to 28 May, mainly from Myawaddy-Mae Sot 2,848 migrants returned from China from 22 to 28 May, through Nan Taw and Chin Shwe Haw A COVID-19 risk communication session at Shwe Myawaddy Quarantine Centre in Myawaddy, Kayin State. © IOM 2020 SITUATION OVERVIEW Returns from Thailand began picking up this week, and from Government during the process of applying for employment 22 to 28 May, 7,031 migrants returned through Myawaddy- cards. PRAs are also required to communicate these regulations Mae Sot, and 150 returned through Kawthaung-Ranoung. to respective Thai employers. Should PRAs not follow these These include 1,979 migrants whose return was facilitated instructions, DOL will revoke the license of the PRA concerned. following coordination between the Embassy of Myanmar in Thailand and Thai authorities, with the rest self-arranging their return. Returnees were also tested for COVID-19 upon arrival to Myanmar, with most returnees, upon confirmation of negative test results, being transported to their communities of origin for quarantine. A total of 45,168 migrants returned from Thailand from 22 March to 28 May. The Department of Labour (DOL) issued a letter on 22 May to the Myanmar Overseas Employment Agency Federation (MOEAF) on the restarting of recruitment procedures for Myanmar migrants seeking migration and employment in Thailand. The letter announced that recruitment procedures are on hold until 31 May, and that Thai authorities will accept migrant workers who have health certificates and who undergo Latrines provided by IOM at a quarantine facility in Myawaddy, Kayin State. -
Status of Transport Connectivity Including Transit Facilitation In
New Delhi, India 19-20 November 2014 Aye Aye Hla,Director Ministry of Rail Transportation Myanmar Myanmar Profile National data Population - 52 millions Land Area - 676,578 sq.km Arable - 19.2% Coastal Line - 2800 km Road Length - 148690 km ESCAP Membership - 19 April 1948 Myanmar is a member of such sub-regional networks as the India- Myanmar-Thailand Highway, the ASEAN Mekong Basin Development Cooperation (AMBDC), the Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar (BCIM) Economic Corridor, the Mekong-Ginga Cooperation and the Mekong Sub- region. Myanmar Perspective Transport is a key to sustainable development and regional integration. Transport connectivity contributes towards the regional development, economic growth and fortifies relations among the neighbouring countries. Myanmar believes a stronger integrated partnership in the Asia Pacific region will greatly contribute to member countries and people as a whole. The development of the infrastructural network will not only expand the region market but also capture international markets. It plays the key role for the country’s economic growth and regional connectivity, integration and mutual benefits. Nowadays, most countries in the Asia have been connected through the Asian Highway Network and the Trans-Asian Railway Network, which will benefit coastal countries and small island developing states by means of maritime services. Myanmar Perspective Myanmar is in a geographically strategic position to greatly benefit both South Asia and Southeast Asia. Myanmar is now regarded as a newly emerging destination for business on account of its strategic geographical location, moderate climate fit for the cultivation of various crops, huge market size, and high production output at low costs. -
BURMA/THAILAND No Safety in Burma, No Sanctuary in Thailand
July 1997 Vol. 9, No. 6 (C) BURMA/THAILAND No Safety in Burma, No Sanctuary in Thailand I. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS .........................................................................................................2 Recommendations..........................................................................................................................................3 II. BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................................................6 III. REFUGEES FROM BURMA'S KAREN AND MON STATES AND TENASSERIM DIVISION ..................7 Human Rights Violations by the Burmese Military.......................................................................................7 Repatriations and Denial of Access By the Royal Thai Government ..........................................................13 Instances of Refoulement.............................................................................................................................13 Attacks on the Refugee Camps ....................................................................................................................18 Conditions in the Refugee Camps................................................................................................................19 IV. SITUATION OF THOSE FROM BURMA'S SHAN STATE...........................................................................20 Human Rights Violations by the Burmese Military.....................................................................................20 -
Thailand Burma China Laos
Burmese border refugee sites with population figures: February 2007 1 TBBC 2 Feb-07 +/(-) Female Male Total Jan-07 CHINA Chiengmai Province Shan Keng Tung WH Wieng Heng (Shan Refugees) 317 287 604 - State Taunggyi Mae Hong Son Province Site 1 Ban Kwai/Nai Soi 9,479 10,260 19,739 66 BURMA Tachilek MaeFaLuang LAOS Site 2 Ban Mae Surin 1,767 1,890 3,657 25 MongYawn Naypyidaw Fang Mae Sai K1 Mae La Oon (Site 3) 7,456 8,248 15,704 (115) Loikaw PaMaPhaDoiDa Karenni Site 1 WH K2 Mae Ra Ma Luang (Site 4) 7,817 8,128 15,945 329 Toungoo State Mae Hong Son Subtotal: 26,519 28,526 55,045 305 Karen State Site 2 Chiang Mai Tak Province K3 Mae La 24,180 25,296 49,476 113 Pegu Mae Sariang Division K4 Umpiem Mai 9,440 10,161 19,601 18 Papun THAILAND Mon K1&2 K5 Nu Po 7,421 7,979 15,400 70 State Manerplaw K3Tha Song Yang Subtotal: 41,041 43,436 84,477 201 Rangoon Mae Ramat Kanchanaburi Province Pa-an Mae Sot Myawaddy Phetchabun K6 Ban Don Yang 2,323 2,268 4,591 (75) K4 Moulmein Ratchaburi Province Umphang K5 K7 Tham Hin 4,794 5,056 9,850 168 Three Pagodas Pass Total for sites in Thailand: 74,994 79,573 154,567 599 M1 Ye K6 M2 Sangklaburi M3 M4 State of Origin of Registered Population 62% Karen 5% Pegu Kanchanaburi Bangkok Tavoy 13% Karenni 4% Unknown K7 Ratchaburi 9% Tenasserim 2% Other (Chin, Kachin, Irrawaddy, Magwe, Mandalay, Tenasserim Suan Phung 5% Mon Rakhine, Rangoon, Sagaing, Shan) Division A N D A M A N S E A IDP Site Wieng Heng: Camp Committee I N D I A Mergui C H I N A PAKISTAN Prachuap Khiri Khan Sites 1 & 2: Karenni Refugee Committee (KnRC) -
The Pattern of Collaboration for Encouraged Sustainability and Management
International Business & Economics Research Journal – July 2009 Volume 8, Number 7 The Pattern Of Collaboration For Encouraged Sustainability And Management Of Ethnic Community In Forest Land And Rural Development In Thailand Prasit Kunurat, Mahasarakham University, Thailand Preecha Piampongsarn, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand Preecha Prathepa, Mahasarakham University, Thailand Boonyong Ketkong, Mahasarakham University, Thailand ABSTRACT This research focuses on factors that influence conflict over land-use patterns in ethnic communities in Phu Phan National Park in the northeast area of Thailand. The purposes of this study were: 1) to examine land use in local communities, 2) to explore the pattern of collaboration for encouraging the sustainability of community management in a forested area, and 3) to set up public policy for the management of land use in forested areas. For this research, we collected and analyzed qualitative and quantitative data. We administered 571 questionnaires to study typical land use, and a mixed methods approach was used to gather data. We found that two categories affect communities’ land use management: 1) social and cultural factors, or ecoculture, and 2) state policy and market accessibility. There are three patterns for management: 1) thinking system, 2) production pattern, and 3) land use. In addition, we also stated the public policies regarding management of the forest, which include 1) a policy of ecology management, 2) a knowledge sharing policy, 3) a policy for the management of the river basin, and 4) a decentralization policy. Keywords: Sustainability, Forest Land, Ethnic community, Rural Development, Thailand INTRODUCTION he global environment has numerous problems as a result of rapid industrial and technological developments, high population growth and unsustainable exploitation of resources. -
Sufficiency Economy: Making a Virtue out of Low Level Reciprocity
Remembering your Feet: Imaginings and Lifecourses in Northeast Thailand Susan Upton A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Bath Department of Social and Policy Sciences August 2010 COPYRIGHT Attention is drawn to the fact that copyright of this thesis rests with its author. A copy of this thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and they must not copy it or use material from it except as permitted by law or with the consent of the author. This thesis may be made available for consultation within the University Library and may be photocopied or lent to other libraries for the purposes of consultation. 1 Dedication This thesis is for my mum, Mary. 2 Contents TABLE OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................................9 MAP OF THAILAND ........................................................................................................................ 11 MAP OF NORTHEAST THAILAND ................................................................................................... 12 MAP OF MUKDAHAN PROVINCE ................................................................................................... 13 MAP OF BAN DONG VILLAGE ....................................................................................................... -
Working Paper NO
Fostering cross-border twin cities as instruments for susta inable development Hubert Massoni Masato Abe ASIA-PACIFIC RESEARCH AND TRAINING NETWORK ON TRADE Working Paper NO. 186 | 2019 The Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade (ARTNeT) is an open regional network of research and academic institutions specializing in international trade policy and facilitation issues. ESCAP, WTO and UNCTAD, as key core network partners, and a number of bilateral development partners, provide substantive and/or financial support to the network. The Trade, Investment and Innovation Division of ESCAP, the regional branch of the United Nations for Asia and the Pacific, provides the Secretariat of the network and a direct regional link to trade policymakers and other international organizations. The ARTNeT Working Paper Series disseminates the findings of work in progress to encourage the exchange of ideas about trade issues. An objective of the series is to publish the findings quickly, even if the presentations are less than fully polished. ARTNeT Working Papers are available online at www.artnetontrade.org. All material in the Working Papers may be freely quoted or reprinted, but acknowledgment is requested together with a copy of the publication containing the quotation or reprint. The use of the Working Papers for any commercial purpose, including resale, is prohibited. Disclaimer: The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this Working Paper do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.