Observation on the Breeding and Development of the Viviparous Fish, Heterandria Formosa. by Elizabeth A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Observation on the Breeding and Development of the Viviparous Fish, Heterandria Formosa. by Elizabeth A Observation on the Breeding and Development of the viviparous fish, Heterandria formosa. By Elizabeth A. Fraser, D.Se., Reader, assisted, by Rachel M. Eenton, Curator of the Aquarium. Department of Zoology, University of London, University College. Witt Plates 26-29, and 13 Text-fignres. Breeding.—Heterandria formosa, one of the small- est viviparous fish, has been known for many years as a common species in tropical aquaria. It is a member of the family Poeciliidae (Garman, 1895-7; Began, 1913; Hubbs, 1924,1926), and a native of fresh-water streams from South Carolina to Florida. Although some records as to its breeding are available, no details of its development or mode of viviparity are known beyond the fact that the egg has little or no yolk and the embryo does not leave the follicle until ready for birth. We have now bred the fish successfully in the aquarium at Univer- sity College, London, for four and a haK years in order to obtain exact information of its habits and life-history. The fish have been kept in small rectangular tanks holding from 3 to 4 litres of water with a layer of coarse sand at the bottom, and in each were usually one adult female and two males. The tanks were placed in a specially heated room which varied in temperature from 20° to 26° 0. Heterandria are hardy and easy to keep; they can stand quite a large range of temperature, but seem to thrive best in water between 22° and 26° C. They are of a placid temperament and rarely fight, and have never been known to eat their young during the four and a half years that they have been under observation.1 Their food has consisted of Enchytraeid worms, finely minced, or small Daphnia, and the young were fed on newly hatched Ar- 1 A fairly large female since bought (1939) has been unusual and habitually swallows her young as soon as they are born. NO. 324 I i 480 ELIZABETH A. FRASER AND RACHEL M. EENTON temia salina. It was never found possible to induce these fish to eat anything but live food, although many of the usual dried fish foods on the market were tried at different i imes, but all without success. On the whole they were remarkably healthy and there was little disease; it was found, however, that if several males were kept in a tank together without a female, there was quite a heavy mortality among them. Copulation was never observed although the male follows the female unceasingly, and it is quite probable that it takes place at night. The birth of young has frequently been watched, the young being born tail first. Usually they are strong and active almost at once, and after resting on the sand for a few minutes they swim to the top to fill the air bladder. Occasion- ally a fish1 (usually a very young female) will give birth to one or two weaklings, which would appear to be born prematurely. These weak young have great difficulty in reaching the surface of the water, they lie on the sand and make repeated efforts to rise. Unless successful soon after birth they do not live long. The life of a female appears to vary considerably with different individuals, but lasts from two to three years. The males have a shorter span. Lebistes, the millions fish, and many other viviparous forms give birth to a large number of young at one time, with an interval of three or four weeks between each delivery. Heterandria, on the other hand, though much less prolific, breeds fairly continuously from February to September or October, with intervals between the births, but produces on an average only one to three at a time. The numbers tend to decrease towards the end of the summer, when a resting period sets in until the following February. Very occasionally an exceptional female will give numbers in excess of this, one individual having had ten at one time on more than one occasion. A female bought in November 1933, of unknown age, gave rise to fifty-one young before she died in June 1935, apparently of old age. Females, when at their prime, usually measure about 25 to 30 mm. from the tip of the snout to the end of the tail, whereas adult males do not usually exceed 17-5 mm. The largest females examined by Eegan (1913) measured 30 mm., whilst the males varied from 15 to 20 mm. DEVELOPMENT OF HETEEANDEIA 481 A remarkably large female adult, when acquired in April 1934, must have measured at least as much as 40 mm.; the exact measurement of her maximum length was not possible, for, when destroyed in May 1936, she was sick and dying and considerable shrinkage had taken place. During this period she gave birth to 170young, of which 150 were born in eight months; she showed signs of diminishing fertility only during the last few months of life, and after death her ovary was found to be a mass of de- generating tissue. Such fertility seems to be very exceptional. The newly born young measure on an average 7-5 mm. At about four weeks old the females can be distinguished by the appearance of a dark spot at the base of the anal fin, but the males cannot be recognized until the anal fin becomes modified into the long copulatory organ, a transformation which takes place quite suddenly at a later date, at an age of about eight weeks. Whilst the males are not capable of copulating before this change is complete, the females may receive the sperma- tozoa from an adult male before the dark spot appears and when they are still quite small. Some young which had been left in the parents' tank until the characteristic spot had become visible, were found to contain embryos a few weeks after removal. Fertilization in this case must have taken place through the male parent. By isolating the young shortly after birth, and separating the females as soon as the dark spot is perceptible, a number of virgin females can be secured. A few weeks later these may be mated with a male and some idea can thus be obtained of the time necessary for fertilization to take place. Accurate data are, however, difficult to obtain, for although the spermatozoa may be introduced almost im- mediately by the male, fertilization does not occur for some days owing to disintegration of ripe ova. Degeneration of the eggs appears to be quite common in viviparous fish, and has been observed in several forms, as well as in other Teleosts; in Heterandria it is especially marked in young females that have not been fertilized. The nearest approach one can make is that fertilization in isolated females seems to ensue in ap- proximately three weeks after the introduction of the males, for embryonic stages of a few cells have been observed about 482 ELIZABETH A. FBASEE AND RACHEL M. BENTON this time. In order to obtain more accurate information a young female was isolated in a separate tank. Fifty-one days later she was mated, and the first young were bor:: fifty-six days afterwards. Assuming fertilization does not take place for about three weeks, the gestation period would be about thirty-five days or about five weeks. This isolated female has had fifty-four young from January 1935 to May 1936, and she died the following July, having attained a length of 38 mm. Females in which the first young are developing measure about 15 to 17 mm., and at first only one or occasionally two are born at a time. As the mother increases in size the number of young also increases. It seems to be the rule for an actively breeding fish to have one to three at a delivery, though the young are not necessarily born on consecutive days, and intervals of one to two weeks may even occur; but this number may be greatly exceeded in exceptional cases. For example, the very large female measuring 40 mm. has brought forth no less than nine young between the hours of twelve and four in the afternoon. It must be borne in mind that these data are for fish bred exclusively in an aquarium under a necessarily artificial en- vironment, and how far they conform to natural conditions we have had no opportunity of ascertaining. Some years ago Seal (1911) published a few observations on the breeding habits of Heterandria formosa, and as far as they go these tally with ours. Recently Turner (1937a), in a paper on reproductive cycles in Poeeiliid fishes, contributed some further details for Heterandria. The numbers of young at a birth and the intervals between the broods corre- spond in general with the average recorded by us. His fish, however, begin to breed in December, and continue until the end of May or July. The resting period is therefore rather longer than in our aquarium, where it begins in October or November and lasts until near the end of January. Technique.—The fish were chloroformed and the ovary was then cut out, and either fixed entire or the larger embryos were removed and preserved separately. The fixation of later stages and isolated embryos presented no difficulty, the usual fixatives, such as Bouin and picro-nitro-osmic, giving satis- DEVELOPMENT OF HETEBANDEIA 483 factory results; but for the earlier stages where the zona is thick and firm, penetration was no easy matter, and moreover the fluid-filled vesicle readily collapses.
Recommended publications
  • Strong Reproductive Skew Among Males in the Multiply Mated Swordtail Xiphophorus Multilineatus (Teleostei)
    Journal of Heredity 2005:96(4):346–355 ª The American Genetic Association. 2005. All rights reserved. doi:10.1093/jhered/esi042 For Permissions, please email: [email protected]. Advance Access publication March 2, 2005 Strong Reproductive Skew Among Males in the Multiply Mated Swordtail Xiphophorus multilineatus (Teleostei) J. LUO,M.SANETRA,M.SCHARTL, AND A. MEYER From Fachbereich Biologie, Universita¨t Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany (Luo, Sanetra, and Meyer); and Physiologische Chemie I, Biozentrum der Universita¨t, Am Hubland, 97074 Wu¨rzburg, Germany (Schartl). Address correspondence to Axel Meyer, Fachbereich Biologie, Universita¨t Konstanz, Fach M617, Universita¨tsstrasse 10, 78457 Konstanz, Germany, or e-mail: [email protected]. Abstract Male swordtails in the genus Xiphophorus display a conspicuous ventral elongation of the caudal fin, the sword, which arose through sexual selection due to female preference. Females mate regularly and are able to store sperm for at least 6 months. If multiple mating is frequent, this would raise the intriguing question about the role of female choice and male-male competition in shaping the mating system of these fishes. Size-dependent alternate mating strategies occur in Xiphophorus; one such strategy is courtship with a sigmoid display by large dominant males, while the other is gonopodial thrusting, in which small subordinate males sneak copulations. Using microsatellite markers, we observed a frequency of multiple paternity in wild-caught Xiphophorus multilineatus in 28% of families analyzed, but the actual frequency of multiple mating suggested by the correction factor PrDM was 33%. The number of fathers contributing genetically to the brood ranged from one to three.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproducción Y Crecimiento De Heterandria Bimaculata
    Rev. Biol. Trop., 47(3): 581-592, 1999 www.ucr.ac.cr WWW.ots.ac.cr www.ots.duke.edu Reproducción y crecimiento de Heterandria bimaculata . (Cyprinodontiformes:PoeciUidae) en la LagUIia " EIRo(}eo"; �orelos,�é�co José Luis Gómez-Márquez, José Luis Guzmán-Santiago y Alberto Olvera-Soto Laboratorio de Limnología, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Zaragoza, Campus ll, UNAM. Batalla del 5 de Mayo esq. Fuerte de Loreto, Col. Ejército de Oriente. C.P. 09230, México, D.F. Fax 7 73 01 51, correo electrónico: [email protected] Recibido 11-VIII-1998. Corregido 11-1-1999. Aceptado 15-1-1999. Abstract: We studied reproduction and growth of Heterandria bimaculata in "El Rodeo" lake Morelos, Mexico, from December 1986 through December 1987. A total of 1 452 specimens were obtained (monthly samples). Females represented 60.12 %, males 34.98 % and the young 4.89 % of the population. Overall sex ratio was 1.7: 1 in favor of females (X2 p<0.05). The size at frrst reproduction for females was 27 mm and for males 22 mm (standard lengths); multiple spawning occured throughout the reproductive cycle (from March through May and July through October) primarily, during the rainy season. There was evidence of breeding activity throughout the year. In July thegonadosomatic index mean was highest (4.7%). The numberof embryos in the ovaries were between 5 and 78, with a mean fertility of 23, the fertility was associated with standard length with deterrnina­ tion coefficients aboye 93.22 percent. There was a direct relationship between specimen length and weight, and the asymptotic size for males was 64 mm and for females 81 mm (standard lengths).
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 1 1 8(2): 143—1 86
    2009. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 1 1 8(2): 143—1 86 THE "LOST" JORDAN AND HAY FISH COLLECTION AT BUTLER UNIVERSITY Carter R. Gilbert: Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA ABSTRACT. A large fish collection, preserved in ethanol and assembled by Drs. David S. Jordan and Oliver P. Hay between 1875 and 1892, had been stored for over a century in the biology building at Butler University. The collection was of historical importance since it contained some of the earliest fish material ever recorded from the states of South Carolina, Georgia, Mississippi and Kansas, and also included types of many new species collected during the course of this work. In addition to material collected by Jordan and Hay, the collection also included specimens received by Butler University during the early 1880s from the Smithsonian Institution, in exchange for material (including many types) sent to that institution. Many ichthyologists had assumed that Jordan, upon his departure from Butler in 1879. had taken the collection. essentially intact, to Indiana University, where soon thereafter (in July 1883) it was destroyed by fire. The present study confirms that most of the collection was probably transferred to Indiana, but that significant parts of it remained at Butler. The most important results of this study are: a) analysis of the size and content of the existing Butler fish collection; b) discovery of four specimens of Micropterus coosae in the Saluda River collection, since the species had long been thought to have been introduced into that river; and c) the conclusion that none of Jordan's 1878 southeastern collections apparently remain and were probably taken intact to Indiana University, where they were lost in the 1883 fire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin and Biogeographic Diversification of Fishes in the Family Poeciliidae
    RESEARCH ARTICLE The origin and biogeographic diversification of fishes in the family Poeciliidae David N. Reznick1*, Andrew I. Furness2, Robert W. Meredith3, Mark S. Springer1 1 Department of Biology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, United States of America, 2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America, 3 Department of Biology and Molecular Biology, Montclair State University, Montclair, New Jersey, United States of America * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract a1111111111 a1111111111 The fish subfamily Poeciliinae (sensu Parenti, 1981) is widely distributed across the West- ern Hemisphere and a dominant component of the fish communities of Central America. Poeciliids have figured prominently in previous studies on the roles of dispersal and vicari- ance in shaping current geographic distributions. Most recently, Hrbek et al. combined a OPEN ACCESS DNA-based phylogeny of the family with geological models to provide a biogeographic per- spective that emphasized the role of both vicariance and dispersal. Here we expand on that Citation: Reznick DN, Furness AI, Meredith RW, Springer MS (2017) The origin and biogeographic effort with a database enlarged in the quantity of sequence represented per species, in the diversification of fishes in the family Poeciliidae. number of species included, and in an enlarged and more balanced representation of the PLoS ONE 12(3): e0172546. doi:10.1371/journal. order Cyprinodontiformes. We combine a robust timetree based upon multiple fossil calibra- pone.0172546 tions with enhanced biogeographic analyses that include ancestral area reconstructions to Editor: Axel Meyer, University of Konstanz, provide a detailed biogeographic history of this clade.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Science – Biology & Ecology
    Fishery Science – Biology & Ecology How Fish Reproduce Illustration of a generic fish life cycle. Source: Zebrafish Information Server, University of South Carolina (http://zebra.sc.edu/smell/nitin/nitin.html) Reproduction is an essential component of life, and there are a diverse number of reproductive strategies in fishes throughout the world. In marine fishes, there are three basic reproductive strategies that can be used to classify fish. The most common reproductive strategy in marine ecosystems is oviparity. Approximately 90% of bony and 43% of cartilaginous fish are oviparous (See Types of Fish). In oviparous fish, females spawn eggs into the water column, which are then fertilized by males. For most oviparous fish, the eggs take less energy to produce so the females release large quantities of eggs. For example, a female Ocean Sunfish is able to produce 300 million eggs over a spawning cycle. The eggs that become fertilized in oviparous fish may spend long periods of time in the water column as larvae before settling out as juveniles. An advantage of oviparity is the number of eggs produced, because it is likely some of the offspring will survive. However, the offspring are at a disadvantage because they must go through a larval stage in which their location is directed by oceans currents. During the larval stage, the larvae act as primary consumers (See How Fish Eat) in the food web where they must not only obtain food but also avoid predation. Another disadvantage is that the larvae might not find suitable habitat when they settle out of the ~ Voices of the Bay ~ [email protected] ~ http://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/education/voicesofthebay.html ~ (Nov 2011) Fishery Science – Biology & Ecology water column.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery of a New Mode of Oviparous Reproduction in Sharks and Its Evolutionary Implications Kazuhiro Nakaya1, William T
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Discovery of a new mode of oviparous reproduction in sharks and its evolutionary implications Kazuhiro Nakaya1, William T. White2 & Hsuan‑Ching Ho3,4* Two modes of oviparity are known in cartilaginous fshes, (1) single oviparity where one egg case is retained in an oviduct for a short period and then deposited, quickly followed by another egg case, and (2) multiple oviparity where multiple egg cases are retained in an oviduct for a substantial period and deposited later when the embryo has developed to a large size in each case. Sarawak swellshark Cephaloscyllium sarawakensis of the family Scyliorhinidae from the South China Sea performs a new mode of oviparity, which is named “sustained single oviparity”, characterized by a lengthy retention of a single egg case in an oviduct until the embryo attains a sizable length. The resulting fecundity of the Sarawak swellshark within a season is quite low, but this disadvantage is balanced by smaller body, larger neonates and quicker maturation. The Sarawak swellshark is further uniquely characterized by having glassy transparent egg cases, and this is correlated with a vivid polka‑dot pattern of the embryos. Five modes of lecithotrophic (yolk-dependent) reproduction, i.e. short single oviparity, sustained single oviparity, multiple oviparity, yolk‑sac viviparity of single pregnancy and yolk‑sac viviparity of multiple pregnancy were discussed from an evolutionary point of view. Te reproductive strategies of the Chondrichthyes (cartilaginous fshes) are far more diverse than those of the other animal groups. Reproduction in chondrichthyan fshes is divided into two main modes, oviparity (egg laying) and viviparity (live bearing).
    [Show full text]
  • Zootoca Vivipara, Lacertidae) and the Evolution of Parity
    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKBIJBiological Journal of the Linnean Society0024-4066The Linnean Society of London, 2004? 2004 871 111 Original Article EVOLUTION OF VIVIPARITY IN THE COMMON LIZARD Y. SURGET-GROBA ET AL. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2006, 87, 1–11. With 4 figures Multiple origins of viviparity, or reversal from viviparity to oviparity? The European common lizard (Zootoca vivipara, Lacertidae) and the evolution of parity YANN SURGET-GROBA1*, BENOIT HEULIN2, CLAUDE-PIERRE GUILLAUME3, MIKLOS PUKY4, DMITRY SEMENOV5, VALENTINA ORLOVA6, LARISSA KUPRIYANOVA7, IOAN GHIRA8 and BENEDIK SMAJDA9 1CNRS UMR 6553, Laboratoire de Parasitologie Pharmaceutique, 2, Avenue du Professeur Léon Bernard, 35043 Rennes Cedex, France 2CNRS UMR 6553, Station Biologique de Paimpont, 35380 Paimpont, France 3EPHE, Ecologie et Biogéographie des Vertébrés, 35095 Montpellier, France 4Hungarian Danube Research Station of the Institute of Ecology and Botany of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 2131 God Javorka S. u. 14., Hungary 5Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences,33 Leninskiy Prospect, 117071 Moscow, Russia 6Zoological Museum of the Moscow State University, Bolshaja Nikitskaja 6, 103009 Moscow, Russia 7Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universiteskaya emb. 1, 119034 St Petersburg, Russia 8Department of Zoology, Babes-Bolyai University, Str. Kogalniceanu Nr.1, 3400 Cluj-Napoca, Romania 9Institute of Biological and Ecological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, Safarik University, Moyzesova 11, SK-04167 Kosice, Slovak Republic Received 23 January 2004; accepted for publication 1 January 2005 The evolution of viviparity in squamates has been the focus of much scientific attention in previous years. In par- ticular, the possibility of the transition from viviparity back to oviparity has been the subject of a vigorous debate.
    [Show full text]
  • No.16 Pseudoxiphophorus Anzuetoi
    KIRKCALDY AQUARIST SOCIETY INFORMATION SHEET Date:- February “2004” No,16 copyright of Kirkcaldy Aquarist Society Name:- Pseudoxiphophorus Anzuetoi. Family:- Poecilidae Origin:- Central America (Guatemala, Honduras, Belize) Size:- Male 5cms & 7 Female 7cm ( u.s.a show size ) Rosen & Bailey first described this species in These markings being peculiar to this species. 1979. Prior to this only two species were known in The body shape is elongated with a pointed head. the subgenus Pseudoxiphophorus, Heterandria The body colour is olive brown with a lighter Bimaculata & Jonesi. The expansion of a further belly. Some short dark stripes sometimes appear six species came in 1979. on the flanks. The new list was ammended with the introduction A spot on the caudal fin is common to the Sub- of, Anzuetoi,Attenuata,Cataractae,Dirempta, Genus. The fins are often tinged with yellow & Literoperas & Obliqua. frequently the outer edge of the dorsal fin has a The last five species come from very limited areas band of colour. The dominant male in any group of Guatemala and so it is very unlikely that they often loses the dark tail spot during displays to be will appear in the Aquarium trade. replaced by an amber area. In February “2002” I was in Belize on a fishing expedition with David McAllister, Brian I have only kept Anzuetoi in a species tank, with Chittenden, Trevor Williams, Martin Mapes and plants added to give cover for harassed Females Derek Lambert. & floating plants should there be any fry. We were only catching Pseudoxiphophorus Temperature is not critical but should be between Bimaculata as we thought, and returning the 20c to 27c, my fish do well at 23c.
    [Show full text]
  • THROWTRAP FISH ID GUIDE.V5 Loftusedits
    Fish Identification Guide For Throw trap Samples Florida International University Aquatic Ecology Lab April 2007 Prepared by Tish Robertson, Brooke Sargeant, and Raúl Urgellés Table of Contents Basic fish morphology diagrams………………………………………..3 Fish species by family…………………………………………………...4-31 Gar…..………………………………………………………….... 4 Bowfin………….………………………………..………………...4 Tarpon…...……………………………………………………….. 5 American Eel…………………..………………………………….5 Bay Anchovy…..……..…………………………………………...6 Pickerels...………………………………………………………...6-7 Shiners and Minnows…………………………...……………….7-9 Bullhead Catfishes……..………………………………………...9-10 Madtom Catfish…………………………………………………..10 Airbreathing Catfish …………………………………………….11 Brown Hoplo…...………………………………………………….11 Orinoco Sailfin Catfish……………………………..……………12 Pirate Perch…….………………………………………………...12 Topminnows ……………….……………………….……………13-16 Livebearers……………….……………………………….…….. 17-18 Pupfishes…………………………………………………………19-20 Silversides..………………………………………………..……..20-21 Snook……………………………………………………………...21 Sunfishes and Basses……………….……………………....….22-25 Swamp Darter…………………………………………………….26 Mojarra……...…………………………………………………….26 Everglades pygmy sunfish……………………………………...27 Cichlids………………………….….………………………….....28-30 American Soles…………………………………………………..31 Key to juvenile sunfish..………………………………………………...32 Key to cichlids………....………………………………………………...33-38 Note for Reader/References…………………………………………...39 2 Basic Fish Morphology Diagrams Figures from Page and Burr (1991). 3 FAMILY: Lepisosteidae (gars) SPECIES: Lepisosteus platyrhincus COMMON NAME: Florida gar ENP CODE: 17 GENUS-SPECIES
    [Show full text]
  • ERSS-African Jewelfish (Hemichromis Letourneuxi)
    African Jewelfish (Hemichromis letourneuxi) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, February 2011 Revised, February 2018, July 2018 Web Version, 7/30/2018 Photo: Noel M. Burkhead – USGS. Available: https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/FactSheet.aspx?SpeciesID=457. (February 2018). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2018): “Africa: Nile to Senegal and from North Africa to Côte d'Ivoire [Central African Republic, Chad, Egypt, Ethiopia, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Sudan; questionable in Algeria].” From Nico et al. (2018): “Tropical Africa. Widespread in northern, central, and west Africa (Loiselle 1979, 1992; Linke and Staeck 1994) in savannah and oasis habitats.” CABI (2018) reports H. letourneuxi as widespread and native in the following countries: Algeria, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chad, Egypt, Ethiopia, Gambia, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sudan, and Uganda. 1 Status in the United States From Eschmeyer et al. (2018): “[…] established in Florida, U.S.A.” From Nico et al. (2018): “Established in Florida. Prior to 1972, found only in Miami Canal and canals on western side of Miami International Airport (Hogg 1976a). Species is now abundant and spreading westward and northward.” “The species was first documented as occurring in south Florida in the Hialeah Canal-Miami River Canal system, Miami area, by Rivas (1965). It is now established and abundant in many canals in and around Miami-Dade County, and also in parts of the Everglades freshwater wetlands and tidal habitats (Courtenay et al. 1974; Hogg 1976a, b; Loftus and Kushlan 1987; Loftus et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Perspectives in the Evolution of Parental Care in Ray-Finned Fishes
    Evolution, 59(7), 2005, pp. 1570±1578 PHYLOGENETIC PERSPECTIVES IN THE EVOLUTION OF PARENTAL CARE IN RAY-FINNED FISHES JUDITH E. MANK,1,2 DANIEL E. L. PROMISLOW,1 AND JOHN C. AVISE1 1Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602 2E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Among major vertebrate groups, ray-®nned ®shes (Actinopterygii) collectively display a nearly unrivaled diversity of parental care activities. This fact, coupled with a growing body of phylogenetic data for Actinopterygii, makes these ®shes a logical model system for analyzing the evolutionary histories of alternative parental care modes and associated reproductive behaviors. From an extensive literature review, we constructed a supertree for ray-®nned ®shes and used its phylogenetic topology to investigate the evolution of several key reproductive states including type of parental care (maternal, paternal, or biparental), internal versus external fertilization, internal versus external gestation, nest construction behavior, and presence versus absence of sexual dichromatism (as an indicator of sexual selection). Using a comparative phylogenetic approach, we critically evaluate several hypotheses regarding evolutionary pathways toward parental care. Results from maximum parsimony reconstructions indicate that all forms of parental care, including paternal, biparental, and maternal (both external and internal to the female reproductive tract) have arisen repeatedly and independently during ray-®nned ®sh evolution. The most common evolutionary transitions were from external fertilization directly to paternal care and from external fertilization to maternal care via the intermediate step of internal fertilization. We also used maximum likelihood phylogenetic methods to test for statistical correlations and contingencies in the evolution of pairs of reproductive traits.
    [Show full text]