1 University of Plymouth Research Outputs University of Plymouth Research Outputs
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
"Official Gazette of RM", No. 28/04 and 37/07), the Government of the Republic of Montenegro, at Its Meeting Held on ______2007, Enacted This
In accordance with Article 6 paragraph 3 of the FT Law ("Official Gazette of RM", No. 28/04 and 37/07), the Government of the Republic of Montenegro, at its meeting held on ____________ 2007, enacted this DECISION ON CONTROL LIST FOR EXPORT, IMPORT AND TRANSIT OF GOODS Article 1 The goods that are being exported, imported and goods in transit procedure, shall be classified into the forms of export, import and transit, specifically: free export, import and transit and export, import and transit based on a license. The goods referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article were identified in the Control List for Export, Import and Transit of Goods that has been printed together with this Decision and constitutes an integral part hereof (Exhibit 1). Article 2 In the Control List, the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license, were designated by the abbreviation: “D”, and automatic license were designated by abbreviation “AD”. The goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license designated by the abbreviation “D” and specific number, license is issued by following state authorities: - D1: the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license issued by the state authority competent for protection of human health - D2: the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license issued by the state authority competent for animal and plant health protection, if goods are imported, exported or in transit for veterinary or phyto-sanitary purposes - D3: the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license issued by the state authority competent for environment protection - D4: the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license issued by the state authority competent for culture. -
European Red List of Birds
European Red List of Birds Compiled by BirdLife International Published by the European Commission. opinion whatsoever on the part of the European Commission or BirdLife International concerning the legal status of any country, Citation: Publications of the European Communities. Design and layout by: Imre Sebestyén jr. / UNITgraphics.com Printed by: Pannónia Nyomda Picture credits on cover page: Fratercula arctica to continue into the future. © Ondrej Pelánek All photographs used in this publication remain the property of the original copyright holder (see individual captions for details). Photographs should not be reproduced or used in other contexts without written permission from the copyright holder. Available from: to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed Published by the European Commission. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. ISBN: 978-92-79-47450-7 DOI: 10.2779/975810 © European Union, 2015 Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Printed in Hungary. European Red List of Birds Consortium iii Table of contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................................1 Executive summary ...................................................................................................................................................5 1. -
Birds Checklist STEPPE BIRDS of CALATRAVA
www.naturaindomita.com BIRDS CHECKLIST C = Common R = Resident. All year round. Steppe Birds of Calatrava LC = Less Common S = Spring & Summer. Usually breeding. Calatrava Steppes and Guadiana Steppes R = Rare or Scarce W = Autumn & Winter M = Only on migration Familia Nombre Científico Inglés Español Frequency Season 1 Podicipedidae Podiceps nigricollis Black-Necked Grebe Zampullín Cuellinegro 2 Podicipedidae Tachybaptus ruficollis Little Grebe Zampullín Común 3 Podicipedidae Podiceps cristatus Great Crested Grebe Somormujo Lavanco 4 Phalacrocoracidae Phalacrocorax carbo Great Cormorant Cormorán Grande 5 Ardeidae Botaurus stellaris Great Bittern Avetoro 6 Ardeidae Ixobrychus minutus Little Bittern Avetorillo Común R S 7 Ardeidae Nycticorax nycticorax Black-Crowned Night Heron Martinete Común LC S 8 Ardeidae Bubulcus ibis Cattle Egret Garcilla Bueyera CR 9 Ardeidae Ardeola ralloides Squacco Heron Garcilla Cangrejera RS 10 Ardeidae Egretta garzetta Little Egret Garceta Común CR 11 Ardeidae Egretta alba Great Egret Garceta Grande LC R 12 Ardeidae Ardea cinerea Grey Heron Garza Real LC R 13 Ardeidae Ardea purpurea Purple Heron Garza Imperial RS 14 Ciconiidae Ciconia ciconia White Stork Cigüeña Blanca CR 15 Ciconiidae Ciconia nigra Black Stork Cigüeña Negra 16 Threskiornithidae Plegadis falcinellus Glossy Ibis Morito Común LC S 17 Threskiornithidae Platalea leucorodia Eurasian Spoonbill Espátula Común LC S 18 Phoenicopteridae Phoenicopterus ruber Greater Flamingo Flamenco Común 19 Anatidae Anser albifrons Greater White-Fronted Goose Ánsar -
SB 31(1) TXT 4/2/11 11:14 Page 23
SB 31(1) TXT 4/2/11 11:14 Page 23 Short Notes Tim Harrison, of the BTO Garden Bird Feeding only those using food or water. More participants Survey (GBFS), has commented that there have in the BTO Garden BirdWatch would be partic- only been five gardens in which Common ularly welcome in Scotland www.bto.org/gbw. Crossbills have been observed feeding during the 40 years of the survey. Four of these (in It may be that Common Crossbills are more likely Norfolk, Dorset, Powys and Hertfordshire) are to come to feeders in areas where tree cover is not in Scotland, while the exact location of the scarce or absent. On Shetland, Mike Pennington fifth is unclear. However, as the GBFS is spread notes that they tend to ignore feeders, but in one across the UK, with c. 250 gardens per winter, invasion about 10 years ago, once they had areas in which garden rarities such as Crossbills found his feeder there were up to a dozen daily might be common could be poorly represented. in the garden, with 15 ringed over two days. Participants in the GBFS are recruited from the larger BTO Garden BirdWatch, a year-round survey that records all birds in gardens rather than Observations on Lesser Whitethroat singing and roosting behaviour in Ayrshire during May 2010 The Lesser Whitethroat Sylvia curruca is on the about 1.5–2 seconds and has an interval of north-western edge of its breeding range in about 8 seconds between song bursts, and (b) a Scotland. Observers have commented on the warbling/twittering sub-song, containing many relatively short song period of male birds in soft warbling notes and quiet chattering Scotland which can make censusing this species segments, only audible at a range of less than difficult (see the species account in Forrester et 10 m. -
The Study of Bird Migration Across the Western Sahara; a Contribution with Sound Luring
The study of bird migration across the Western Sahara; a contribution with sound luring Marc Herremans Royal Museum for Central Africa, Leuvensesteenweg 17, 3080 Tervuren, Belgium; e-mail: [email protected] Report of field research in Mauritania during spring and autumn 2003 in association with the Sahara project of the Swiss Ornithological Institute (Vogelwarte Sempach). Abstract During spring and autumn migration 2003, the Swiss Ornithological Institute set up a concerted project in Mauritania to study bird migration across the Sahara (see www.vogelwarte.ch/sahara/). I participated with a side project using artificial induction of landfall with sound luring in an attempt to overcome the potential problem of low sample sizes for random trapping of natural landfall. A comparison with sound lured samples was also expected to provide more insights into the motivation of birds to stop or fly. In total, 9.467 migrants of 55 species were ringed, 590 birds recaptured locally and 49 ringed in Europe were recovered. Sound luring was more effective in autumn, when samples became, however, heavily dominated by Reed Warblers (Acrocephalus scirpaceus) and Garden Warblers (Sylvia borin). In autumn, adults migrated ahead of juveniles, and in Reed and Garden Warblers, most adults travelled over the interior of the Sahara, while juveniles were concentrated along the coast; no such effect was seen in species that avoided the interior (Nightingale Luscinia megarhynchos, Grasshopper Warbler Locustella naevia). Local recapture rates were low (6%), particularly inland in autumn (1%), where many more birds (12%) made longer stopovers in spring. In autumn, there were many more birds in poor condition along the coast than inland; birds in poor condition had much higher recapture rates, and birds in good condition (fat score >3, muscle score=3) rarely made a stopover. -
Spectacled Warbler in North Yorkshire: New to Britain and Ireland Craig C
Spectacled Warbler in North Yorkshire: new to Britain and Ireland Craig C. Thomas, Richard E. Harbird and Peter J. Dunn ABSTRACT A Spectacled Warbler Sylvia conspicillata watched and trapped at Filey, North Yorkshire, during 24th-29th May 1992 is the first incontrovertible record of this Mediterranean species in Britain and Ireland. Mid to late May 1992 was dominated by settled anticyclonic conditions with prevailing easterly winds and coastal mist. Conditions at Filey, North Yorkshire, were therefore near perfect when CCT and REH decided to 'work' the Long Hedge towards the Tip at 08.15 GMT on 24th May. After 400 m with nothing of note, CCT spotted a movement in the hedge 20 m ahead. Although largely obscured, the bird was clearly a warbler with dark lores, but initial thoughts of Lesser Whitethroat Sylvia curruca were quashed when it hopped onto an exposed branch. CCT's heartbeat quickened as he immediately switched to the telescope before shouting over to REH that he had found 'an interesting Sylvia'. Within seconds, REH had ploughed through a hole in the hedge so small that a Goldcrest Regulus regulus would normally have struggled to get through, and together they watched the warbler feeding out in the open. Several features fitted Spectacled Warbler S. conspicillata, notably the small body size, blackish lores, bright rufous wings, pale lower mandible, white throat contrasting with salmon-pink underparts, bright legs and small [Brit. Birds 91: 225-230, June 1998] © British Birds Ltd 1998 225 226 Thomas el al: Spectacled Warbler in North Yorkshire AT 80 & 81. Male Spectacled Warblers Sylvia conspicillata: above, Mallorca, Spain, April 1993 (David M. -
Identification of Arabian Warbler
Identification of Arabian Warbler Hadoram Shirihai Illustrated by Alan Harris he Arabian Warbler Sylvia leucomelaena was originally placed in the Tgenus Parisoma. Meinertzhagen (1949), Williamson (1960) and others placed it in the genus Sylvia owing to its morphological similarities to this genus. Afik (1984) was convinced that this was incorrect, however, as its biological characteristics and nesting range differed from other Sylvia species. In the British Museum (Natural History), Tring, I compared the genera Parisoma and Sylvia. I believe that the Arabian Warbler represents a link between these two genera. Morphologically it resembles Parisoma in wing shape, tail-to-wing ratio, and tail pattern; the bill shape, however, is more similar to that of Orphean Warbler S. hortensis. The Arabian Warbler occurs on both sides of the Red Sea—in Arabia, Somalia and Sudan—between the genus Parisoma in Africa and the genus Sylvia in the Palearctic. In the 1960s, it was found to breed in the Arava Valley, Israel (Zahavi & Dudai 1974; Inbar 1977); this is the northernmost limit of its world range. The population in Israel is resident, making only short-distance movements. Three subspecies have been described: S. 1. blanfordi in Sudan, S. I. leucomelaena in Arabia and S. I. somaliensis in Somalia. A comparison between specimens from Israel and those in the British Museum shows the Israeli birds to differ both in plumage and, to a lesser extent, in size from these three races. They are most similar to the Arabian S. I. leucomelaena, but may be isolated from that race and thus may require recognition as a separate subspecies, S. -
Hints for Recognising Bird Song
Hints for recognising bird song • Start close to home – in your garden or around the streets where you live. You see these birds every day but maybe take them for granted. Take more notice of them and try to memorise their songs and calls. Try to link the song to the image of the bird. • Do the same when you are walking in your local area – Aston’s Eyot is ideal as there is a wide range of resident and migrant birds, as well as water birds. • Whenever you hear a call or song you don’t recognise, try to track it down to see which bird is making the sound – it’s easier to remember a song or call when you have seen the bird making it. • Soon you will have a base of knowledge that can be extended as time goes on. This helps with the process of elimination when trying to identify unrecognised songs and calls – It sounds like a blackbird but …… ie ‘Same but different’ Once you have built up a basic knowledge of the commonest birds you will find that you recognise a song but can’t remember which bird you should attach it to. Here are a few pointers to help remind you how to tell similar sounding songs apart, by linking hints to the names of the birds. To understand what the hints are describing you would need to listen to the songs – see the last page for useful websites and resources. Mnemonics for distinguishing similar bird songs Robin / Wren / Dunnock To a beginner, these three birds can be confused. -
Central Asian Lesser Whitethroats
Northumberland & Tyneside Bird Club Registered Charity No 517641 This is a short paper produced by Colin Bradshaw. Central Asian Lesser Whitethroats Central Asian Lesser Whitethroats by Colin Bradshaw In 2002 I was asked to analyse the issue of identifying Central Asian Lesser Whitethroats for BBRC after the occurrence of birds on Fair Isle and Teeside and find a rational way of addressing the issue and particularly the place of the subspecies Sylvia curruca halimodendri. This was largely because, although both halimodendri and minula are long-distance vagrants and would surely be worth recording if we could, there was some doubt as to how accurately we could distinguish between the two forms. Lesser Whitethroat Sylvia curruca curruca Sumburgh Head, Shetland September 2008 (C. Bradshaw) Shirihai et al had placed halimodendri in the curruca group but my experience from the southern end of their geographical range suggested that this was by no means the last word and that view was shared by several European taxonomists who knew a lot more about the subject than me. In May 2006 I spent a few weeks in southern Kazakhstan watching & photographing Lesser Whitethroats and it made me totally re-evaluate my position. In 2002 after all the reading and the experience of the 2000 Teeside bird, I believed that we should be prepared to consider three groups, nominate including blythi, the Desert Lesser Whitethroat group minula/margelenica and the Mountain or Hume’s Lesser Whitethroat group althea. However, for several reasons, margelenica and althea are highly unlikely vagrants so the rest of this discussion will focus on halimodendri and minula. -
Identification of Siberian and Other Forms of Lesser Whitethroat Kevin Baker
Identification of Siberian and other forms of Lesser Whitethroat Kevin Baker eports of the central Asian (Siberian) race of Lesser Whitethroat Sylvia R curruca blythi have increased in Britain and Ireland over the past decade or so. The reasons for this are unclear, but the trend follows the increased westward vagrancy of other Siberian passerines, which have now become a regular feature of late autumn (Baker 1977; Elkins 1983; continued... 3gO [Brit Birds 81: 382-390, August 1988] Identification of Siberian Lesser Whitethroat 383 Table 1. Selected records of 'Siberian Lesser Whitethroat' Sylvia curruca blythi in Britain All reports concern singles unless otherwise stated. This list is the result of an extensive, but not exhaustive, literature search County Records Shetland Fair Isle, 5th and 27th September 1964, 26th September 1965, 17th and 30th September 1968. Northumberland Hauxley, 3rd October 1964 (two), 3rd November 1968, 19th October 1972, 21st October 1978, 8th November 1981; Craster, 20th October 1968; Holy Island, 12th October 1980. Humberside Spurn, 29th October 1948, 9th October 1949, 26th September 1965, 7th October 1966, 28th October 1971, 19th October 1972, 23rd October 1981, 1 lth and 12th October 1982; Flamborough, 8th October 1977, 1st October 1978, 10th and 16th October 1982. North Yorkshire Scarborough, 19th October 1975. Lincolnshire Saltfleet (two) and Theddlethorpe, 18th October 1981; Anderby, 20th and 25th October 1981; Donna Nook, 14th November 1981. Norfolk Sheringham, 16th September 1976, 12th October 1980; Wells, 12th October 1980; Welney (feeding on bird-table), 11th December to 14th January 1980. Kent Sandwich Bay, 21st October, (possibly another) 1st November 1985; Dungeness, 4th, 5th and 6th October 1986. -
Current Status Ecology and Management Species Profile
Species Profile UK Biodiversity Status: Mammal Society, Game Conservancy Trust. UK Lead Partners: Scottish Executive, RSPB UK Champion: Shanks Relevant Habitat Action Plans: Farmland, Grassland. Statutory Protection: Offered limited protection under the Game Acts in that hares may not be sold between 1 March and 31 July. (LepusBrown europaeus) Hare Current Status Brown hares are not native to Britain but are thought to have Species Action Plan Objectives been introduced by the Romans. They are widely distributed across lowland Britain, being replaced in the uplands by the Main Objective Maintain and enhance the population and related mountain hare (Lepus timidus). This pattern is seen distribution of the brown hare in Ayrshire. in Ayrshire although brown hares do penetrate into the margins ofthe uplands in the east of the county. Work Objectives Objective 1 Brown hares are a fairly common sight in Ayrshire although Establish the distribution and population of the species. often only a few are seen at a time. This makes it difficult to Targets estimate the abundance ofthe species and since no previous Develop a methodology for monitoring the distribution work has looked at hares in the area, it is not possible to say of hares in Ayrshire by 2002; whether or not their numbers have changed significantly. Complete montoring and develop an index of relative Anecdotalevidence suggestsa decline and this is the case in abundance by 2005. B r i tain as a whole. The 19 8 0 s and 199 0 s ha ve seen a Objective 2 downturn in both their distribution and their numbers with Raise awareness of the benefits of mixed farming and 70% of counties recording decreases. -
Earth History and the Passerine Superradiation
Earth history and the passerine superradiation Carl H. Oliverosa,1, Daniel J. Fieldb,c, Daniel T. Ksepkad, F. Keith Barkere,f, Alexandre Aleixog, Michael J. Andersenh,i, Per Alströmj,k,l, Brett W. Benzm,n,o, Edward L. Braunp, Michael J. Braunq,r, Gustavo A. Bravos,t,u, Robb T. Brumfielda,v, R. Terry Chesserw, Santiago Claramuntx,y, Joel Cracraftm, Andrés M. Cuervoz, Elizabeth P. Derryberryaa, Travis C. Glennbb, Michael G. Harveyaa, Peter A. Hosnerq,cc, Leo Josephdd, Rebecca T. Kimballp, Andrew L. Mackee, Colin M. Miskellyff, A. Townsend Petersongg, Mark B. Robbinsgg, Frederick H. Sheldona,v, Luís Fábio Silveirau, Brian Tilston Smithm, Noor D. Whiteq,r, Robert G. Moylegg, and Brant C. Fairclotha,v,1 aDepartment of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803; bDepartment of Biology & Biochemistry, Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom; cDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, United Kingdom; dBruce Museum, Greenwich, CT 06830; eDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108; fBell Museum of Natural History, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108; gDepartment of Zoology, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, São Braz, 66040170 Belém, PA, Brazil; hDepartment of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131; iMuseum of Southwestern Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131; jDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, Animal Ecology, Evolutionary Biology Centre,