DOCSLIB.ORG

Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council DONCASTER METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE - 23rd November 2010 Application 1 Application 10/02929/3ADV Application 2nd December 2010 Number: Expiry Date: Application Application to Display Advs (DMBC Reg 3) Type: Proposal Display of various non illuminated free standing post mounted Description: sponsorship signs to roundabouts across the borough At: Various Locations Around The Borough Doncaster South Yorkshire (see list in appendix 1) For: DMBC Warmsworth, Cadeby, Third Party None Parish: Stainton, Rossington, Reps: Cantley with Branton, Blaxton, Austerfield, Edenthorpe, Marr, Barnby Dunn & Kirk Sandall, Armthorpe, Thorne/Moorends, Hatfield Ward: Mexborough, Town Moor, Central, Balby, Wheatley, Sprotbrough, Cantley & Bessacarr, Armthorpe, Finningley, Conisbrough & Denaby, Thorne, Rossington, Hatfield Author of Report Gareth Stent MAIN RECOMMENDATION: Grant Further Assessment of the Proposal This application was previously considered at the 23rd November 2010 Planning Committee, where it was deferred in order that the applicants and other interested parties have the opportunity to explore the highway safety implications of the proposal. This was originally intended to take place on the 14th December 2010 committee, however will now take place via a technical briefing to be held on the 8th December at 11.00am. Representatives from South Yorkshire Police, Doncaster Council Highway Safety officers and the applicants are invited to present their case. In addition since the deferral, the applicant (Heather Coulthard: Neighbourhood Manager Bessacarr and Cantley) has written to South Yorkshire police to try and establish how many deaths or accidents have happened in Doncaster regarding drivers reading the signs on roundabouts. The response from Julian Anderson OSS Analyst is attached in full: “A collision having a causation factor resulting from reading a sign would be classed by the Police Officer as a "Distraction Outside the Vehicle." This is an official Dept. of Transport classification. It is not broken down any further into specific reasons. To drill down any further would require a manual read of the case files and or incident logs, assuming the collision is recorded / reported to the Police. It is also worth bearing in mind that it is not really in human nature to admit such errors and if a person was questioned may indicate another reason for the collision. It is also worth noting that slow speed rear end shunts (that may result from read such a sign at a R/about) could be a damage only collision (i.e. no injury) and may never get reported to the police or their insurance company, for that matter. However, this is pure speculation. I have briefly talked to the Sgt. in the Serious Collision Unit regarding this matter, as he has many years of experience and would be aware of such issues if they arose during an investigation or at trial. He states that in some 22 years he can say he has not come across a collision where a sign was a factor. If it had come out during the investigation that a sign had obstructed the drivers view (slightly different to your question but could be a factor), he would have to indicate this to the court.” This response can be discussed at the forthcoming committee meeting. ==================================================================== 1.0 Reason for Report 1.0 The application is required to be presented to committee because it has been submitted by Doncaster Council and is likely to generate significant interest and has objections from statutory consultees. 2.0 Proposal and Background 2.1 The application is for the display of up to 215 non illuminated post mounted sponsorship signs placed within roundabouts and central reservations across the borough. Due to the multiple locations, a single advertisement application has been submitted to cover the entire borough. The signs if approved, will replace several that currently exist within the boroughs roundabouts. The agents and company responsible for making the submission is Immediate Solutions. Immediate Solutions have acted for several other councils on similar advertisement schemes and won the tender to act on the councils behalf to regularise the signage within the borough, make it more efficient and effective. This scheme is not speculative, but part of a strategic programme of works due to be undertaken by the council. 2.2 The submission contains 58 locations within the borough with each having between 2- 8 signs per roundabout/central reservation. Although the general locations of the signs have been shown, the exact position of these signs will need further consideration, and this application is simply to agree the principle of supporting the initiative. The decision will not be issued until these have been agreed. 3.0 Relevant Planning History None of the existing roundabout signage has had advertisement consent. 4.0 Representations 4.1 Due to the number of sites proposed, the application was advertised in the Doncaster Star on the 14th October 2010. No individual letters of opposition were received. 5.0 Parish Council 5.1 Rossington Parish Council: No observations. 5.2 Edenthorpe Parish Council: Request care is taken in positioning the proposed signs so as not to detract from the attractive flowers beds which make the Edenthorpe Roundabout one of the most attractive in the borough. The neighbourhood manager should be consulted. 5.3 Thorne & Moorends Town Council: Object to the application on the ground of Road Safety. If however permission is granted and the project goes ahead the Council requests a share of the revenue generated by signage within the Parish. 6.0 Relevant Consultations 6.1 DMBC Traffic and Road Safety Engineer: The engineer notes that details of the sign construction, installation methods, and materials used would be useful in order to fully assess the likely road safety implications. It is also queried whether passive safety has been considered, what are the secondary safety implications and how the product is likely to perform when subjected to vehicle impact damage and wind loading. Concern was also raised in regard to the ‘spiked’ post tops. 6.2 The officer noted that some of the proposed locations at roundabouts where opposite each entry arm, generally coinciding with the existing location of the mandatory ‘Turn Left’ signage. The proposed sponsorship sign location must not obstruct these signs, and it is suggested that for consistency and to minimise road safety concerns, these signs should where possible be mounted in line with the existing signs, at a location to the right when viewed from the entry. This ensures that when viewed, the road user is looking towards potentially conflicting circulating traffic coming from the right, rather than looking away from it. 6.3 The highway officer then commented on the individual locations for the signage and highlighted several sites where the number of signs can be reduced and some deleted in order to minimise unnecessary clutter. 6.4 South Yorkshire Police: The consultation response specifically assesses highway safety, and the Traffic officer accepts that the use of this medium has become commonplace in the UK. Some level of control over the number, size, construction and deployment of such signs is, however, necessary. Sign clutter has reached epidemic levels with extraneous signs now detracting from those signs vital to the safety of motorists. It is clear that in drawing up both the sign design and location detail the designer has solely the promotion of the sponsor in mind with little consideration given to road user safety. If these were to be 'road signs', by definition, most of them would be rejected out of hand. Little consideration has been given as to how these will perform in the event of vehicular impact. 6.5 The consultation response urges the designer and the highway authority to take into consideration the weight of research into the effects of roadside furniture in collisions. In the first instance the sign construction is a direct road safety concern. The physical size of the signs presents a danger to anyone coming into contact with them, particularly motorcyclists. 6.6 The height of the signs at many locations restricts drivers’ views of other road users circulating the carriageway. The officer estimated that the upright posts to be approx 150mm square. The potential for serious injury for anyone losing control and colliding with them is significant. Design standards suggest that posts of this diameter should be of a passively safe material when adjacent to high speed roads (50mph and above) unless behind safety fence (crash barrier). There is no detail of the 'set back' distance (min 450mm) from the edge of carriageway; again there is a detailed specification for this to ensure that there is sufficient safety margin. 6.7 The traffic officer has then commented individually on some of the signs, requesting that they be of a passively safe material and in some cases removed from the scheme all together i.e. signs OSR4 & OSR 6 - High level of collisions at this location – Unsuitable location for any non mandatory signage. 6.8 In summary the traffic officer generally considers that the signs are too large a size for most of the locations. On many of them the mandatory signing, chevrons etc preclude the proposals. The highway authority should be aware that in permitting the placing of these signs they could find themselves subject to third party claims from anyone believing the signs to have caused or contributed towards any collision. 6.9 The officer highlights that in the event of a serious incident occurring as a consequence of a road user colliding with these signs, reference will be made to the comments made in respect of the suitability of them, as highlighted in the police consultation response. 6.10 CPRE Campaign to Protect Rural England: Objections were raised, suggesting that the signs would disfigure the urban environment and create distracting and therefore dangerous clutter for drivers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Accreditation Scheme for Museums and Galleries in the United Kingdom: Collections Development Policy
    Accreditation Scheme for Museums and Galleries in the United Kingdom: Collections development policy 1 Collections development policy Name of museum: Doncaster Museum Service Name of governing body: Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Date on which this policy was approved by governing body: January 24th 2013 Date at which this policy is due for review: January 2018 1. Museum’s statement of purpose The Museum Service primarily serves those living in the Doncaster Metropolitan Borough area and those connected to the King‟s Own Yorkshire Light Infantry* and believes that its purpose can by summed up in four words : Engage, Preserve, Inspire, Communicate * The King‟s Own Yorkshire Light Infantry Museum has its own Collections Development Policy, but is included in the 2013-16 Forward Plan and therefore the Museum Service‟s statement of purpose. 2. An overview of current collections. Existing collections, including the subjects or themes and the periods of time and /or geographic areas to which the collections relate 2.0 At present (2012) the following collections have a member of staff with expertise in that particular field. Social History (including costume and photographs) Archaeology (Including Antiquities) World Cultures Fine and Decorative Arts Other collections are not supported by in-house expertise. For these we would actively look to recruit volunteers or honorary curators with knowledge relevant to these collections. We would also look to apply for grants to take on a temporary staff member to facilitate the curation of these collections. We would also look at accessing external expertise and working in partnership with other organisations and individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • FINNINGLEY QUARRY EXTENSION Finningley Proposed 56 Hectare
    FINNINGLEY QUARRY EXTENSION Finningley Proposed 56 hectare Extension Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment December 2013 FINNINGLEY QUARRY EXTENSION Finningley Proposed 56 hectare Extension Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment December 2013 Prepared by: Sarah Brooks CMLI Brooks Landscape Architecture Tel: 07582 470459 Email: [email protected] Prepared for: Lafarge Tarmac Southfield Lane Whitwell Worksop Nottinghamshire S80 3LJ © Sarah Brooks 2013 No part of this document may be reproduced by any means without the prior permission of the author. Finningley Quarry Extension - Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment BLA _______________________________________________________________________________________ FINNINGLEY QUARRY EXTENSION Finningley Proposed 56 hectare Extension Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment December 2013 CONTENTS 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Approach and Methods 1 1.3 Site Description and Development Proposals 4 1.4 Regulatory / Policy Framework 7 1.5 Baseline Conditions 12 1.6 Potential Effects and Mitigation 22 1.7 Significance of Landscape and Visual Effects 24 1.8 Summary 27 Appendix 1 Landscape and Visual Assessment Criteria Appendix 2 Landscape Impact Assessment Table Appendix 3 Visual Impact Assessment Table Appendix 4 Figures and Plates Figure 1 Landscape Context Figure 2 Landscape Character Figure 3 Visual Impact Assessment Plates 1 to 5 Viewpoints 1 to 10 _____________________________________________________________________________________ LVIA report (finala)/ December 2013 Finningley Quarry Extension - Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment BLA _______________________________________________________________________________________ 1.1 Introduction 1.1.1 A landscape and visual impact assessment (LVIA) has been undertaken as part of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) to accompany a planning application by LafargeTarmac (the Applicant) for a 56 hectare (ha) extension to the existing Finningley Quarry sand and gravel pit (also referred to as the ‘Application Area’) near Doncaster.
    [Show full text]
  • The Doncaster Green Infrastructure Strategy 2014- 2028
    The Doncaster Green Infrastructure Strategy 2014- 2028 Creating a Greener, Healthier & more Attractive Borough Adoption Version April 2014 Doncaster Council Service Improvement & Policy (Regeneration & Environment) 0 1 the potential of the Limestone Valley, which runs through the west of the borough. Did you know that Doncaster has 65 different woodlands which cover an area in excess of 521 hectares? That’s about the equivalent to over 1,000 football pitches. There are 88 different formal open spaces across the borough, which include football, rugby and cricket pitches, greens, courts and athletics tracks. Doncaster is also home to 12 golf courses. The Trans-Pennine Trail passes through Doncaster and is integral to the extensive footpath and cycle network that link the borough’s communities with the countryside, jobs and recreation opportunities. There are so Foreword from the many more features across Doncaster and these are covered within this Strategy document. Portfolio Holder… Despite this enviable position that communities in Doncaster enjoy, there is always so much more that can be done to make the borough’s GI even greater. The Strategy sets out a framework As Portfolio Holder for Environment & Waste at for ensuring maximum investment and funding Doncaster Council, I am delighted to introduce is being channelled, both by the Council and the the Doncaster Green Infrastructure Strategy vast array of important partners who invest so 2014-2028: Creating a Greener, Healthier & much time and resources, often voluntarily, into more Attractive Borough. making our GI as good as it can be. As the largest metropolitan Borough in the This Strategy will help deliver a better country, covering over 220 square miles, connected network of multi-purpose spaces and Doncaster has an extensive green infrastructure provide the opportunity for the coordination (GI) network which includes numerous assets and delivery of environmental improvements and large areas that are rural in character.
    [Show full text]
  • Doncaster Local Plan: Archaeological Scoping Assessment
    Doncaster Local Plan: Archaeological Scoping Assessment Allocation Reference: 501 Area (Ha): 0.53 Allocation Type: Housing NGR (centre): SE 6936 1566 Site Name: Adjacent 46 Marshlands Rd, Thorne Moorends Settlement: Thorne Moorends Allocation Recommendations Archaeological significance of site Unknown Historic landscape significance Negligible Suitability of site for allocation Uncertain archaeological constraint Summary Within site Within buffer zone Scheduled Monument - - Listed Building - - SMR record/event - 1 record Cropmark/Lidar evidence No Yes Cartographic features of interest No No Estimated sub-surface disturbance Low n/a www.archeritage.co.uk Page 1 of 3 Doncaster Local Plan: Archaeological Scoping Assessment Allocation Reference: 501 Area (Ha): 0.53 Allocation Type: Housing NGR (centre): SE 6936 1566 Site Name: Adjacent 46 Marshlands Rd, Thorne Moorends Settlement: Thorne Moorends Site assessment Known assets/character: The SMR does not record any features within the site. One findspot is recorded within the buffer zone, a Bronze Age flint arrowhead. No listed buildings or Scheduled Monuments are recorded within the site or buffer zone. The Magnesian Limestone in South and West Yorkshire Aerial Photographic Mapping Project records levelled ridge and furrow remains within the buffer zone. The Historic Environment Characterisation records the present character of the site as modern commercial core- suburban, probably associated with the construction of Moorends mining village in the first half of the 20th century. There is no legibility of the former parliamentary enclosure in this area. In the western part of the buffer, the landscape character comprises land enclosed from commons and drained in 1825, with changes to the layout between 1851 and 1891 in association with the construction of a new warping system.
    [Show full text]
  • Blaxton-Pc 10 10 2019 Redacted
    The following message has been applied automatically, to promote news and information from Nottinghamshire County Council about events and services: Got a question about recycling in Nottinghamshire? Check out our Check out our frequently asked questions. #RecycleForNotts Emails and any attachments from Nottinghamshire County Council are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to the email, and then delete it without making copies or using it in any other way. Senders and recipients of email should be aware that, under the Data Protection Act 2018 and the Freedom of Information Act 2000, the contents may have to be disclosed in response to a request. Although any attachments to the message will have been checked for viruses before transmission, you are urged to carry out your own virus check before opening attachments, since the County Council accepts no responsibility for loss or damage caused by software viruses. You can view our privacy notice at: https://www.nottinghamshire.gov.uk/global-content/privacy Nottinghamshire County Council Legal Disclaimer. 2 PARISH COUNCILS OF AUCKLEY, BLAXTON, BRANTON-WITH-CANTLEY AND FINNINGLEY (ALL PART OF DMBC FINNINGLEY WARD). JOINT COMMENTS IN RESPONSE TO CONSULATION ON THE NOTTINGHAMSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL DRAFT MINERALS PLAN. Summary In isolation the proposals to develop sites at Austerfield, Misson, Barnby Moor and Scrooby seem innocuous, however when considered alongside existing and proposed developments in both Nottinghamshire and the DMBC area, we have serious concerns about the impact on our communities, particularly the potential increase in Heavy Goods and other vehicles on an already busy road network in and around our villages.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes 18 April 2019.Pdf
    BLAXTON PARISH COUNCIL MINUTES OF THE PARISH COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON THURSDAY 18 APRIL 2019 IN BLAXTON VILLAGE HALL AT 19:35 PRESENT: Councillors N McCarron (Chair), P Schofield, R Dennis, R Johnson and J Scutt APOLOGIES: All present IN ATTENDANCE: J Mason (Item 12(e)) and P A Dennis (Clerk) MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC – Three 1) APOLOGIES – All Present 2) TO CONSIDER THE EXTENT, IF ANY, TO WHICH THE PUBLIC ARE TO BE EXCLUDED FROM THE MEETING – None 3) DECLARATION OF PREJUDICIAL INTERESTS, OTHER INTERESTS, THE RECEIPT OF GIFTS AND HOSPITALITY AND REQUESTS FOR DISPENSATION – None 4) MINUTES OF THE PARISH COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON 21 MARCH 2019 RESOLVED (1) That the Minutes of the Parish Council Meeting held on 21 March 2019 be confirmed as a correct record and signed by the Chair. 5) PUBLIC PARTICIPATION a) Fly Grazing During the Annual Parish Meeting the Council had heard of the plight of traveller horses which were fly-grazed on now-barren land without the owners providing food, water and veterinary care, with the result that the animals and their offspring were dying. Some horses were straying onto roads and a vehicle was reported to have collided with a horse on the A614 Thorne Road. It appeared that horses were sometimes moved on by the owners only to be replaced by horses from elsewhere. Members were aware of animals which had been rescued, some of which subsequently died or had to be destroyed. It appeared that this problem, which had existed in the area for many years, was not being dealt with robustly by the authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • 19/02884/FULM Application Type
    Application 3. Application 19/02884/FULM Number: Application Planning FULL Major Type: Proposal Use of land as a commercial crane hire business including re profiling Description: of ground levels, construction of a new office and welfare building, workshop, prep, blast and paint areas, crane tracks, car parking, landscaping and means of access. At: Land At Former Blaxton Quarry Mosham Road Auckley Doncaster For: HTC Wolffkran Ltd Third Party Reps: 8 in opposition Parish: Auckley Parish Council Ward: Finningley Author of Report Mark Sewell SUMMARY The proposal is considered to be acceptable in policy terms given the planning history of the site and its policy allocation and is considered to be an acceptable and sustainable form of development in line with paragraph 7 and 8 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF, 2019). The report demonstrates that there are no material planning considerations that would significantly or demonstrably outweigh the social, economic or environmental benefits of the proposal. The development would not cause undue harm to neighbouring properties, the highway network or the wider character of the area. The unavoidable consequences of developing the site in terms of environmental impact will be mitigated. The scheme will deliver additional jobs for the Borough and is an allocated employment site in both the saved Unitary Development Plan proposals map and the Draft Local Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Grant planning permission subject to a Section 106 Agreement Mosham Road Proposed site entrance Gate House Lane 1.0 Reason for Report 1.1 This application is being presented to Planning Committee as a result of the level of public interest and number of representations received.
    [Show full text]
  • Doncaster Cycling Map
    6 A 6 N V T O 4 W 3 E B Bentley Moor E A R N H 2 E 8 L O Wood N R M E 2 C TH OA R D A OR D M N L IN W E I D E V S A N P L I V E BO E L EADO F T N IV O A M W IE S U R R N F H E E D T E H F V E L U R BE T E AR I Dunscroft M A R S L O UM EN O LO M L W V N O W C PA A NT A UTTERW R E RK G O L E N Y ORT T R W E Barnby Dun O R AV H UT U S Adwick D U D O A T EN L B Y R B U R AD A E M E WIC S IV A E K LA Common V T E C T NE E F N T A 9 H E U H V C PO 1 E S E A H N E C E R A AVE D I GTON I K T ENNIN R YN IN O K C L N U GSLE A I Y V Adwick Pk E T R E E B V L O N N D A A A A U LA Jun Sch A W D O C E K E L R K Barnby Dun Frickley OOD N E A R U V B E L W A A R T A E N E E S R E V T N A S N N A Common H V E R E C E H A Park Hill N U T A N F T A B D Playing Fields O SB U IN W D U E Almholme Hooton R Y SW Outwood IC A Grange AVENUE ADWICK K R 49 50 51 52 53 W54 55 56 57 Shaftholme 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 L M Town and country maps with hundreds of miles of routes E A A N Academy S N E T E N Grumble Hurst H Pagnell R H LA O I A O G N L R B LE STREET L M R G I OO P L S O T V O North Ridge L O E S O L R L E CLAYT U LAN V N A NE AN L ON L ALK H LA E E A ANE N GE B Community E R TPT SHAFT ME G PO ID E N HOL H C N R D R C D N O Q C E A E L E E A E Lound Hill L L X R S U E N A School T O S U K R RT E N 'S O D N L O T N M D G E A N O E A A S E B N ECT R V R Plantation R E O O N V S L V R ND U O O U L O R O A R A I I Toll Bar R E T A N L A V R O D ENT N M L R T A ESC D Almholme Field I E I G E A V R E D A EW E E O E C N V V T D IV E D I V I T G N S E E R R Prim Sch
    [Show full text]
  • 57A 57C 57F 58A 58C 58F Valid From: 22 March 2020
    Bus service(s) 57a 57c 57f 58a 58c 58f Valid from: 22 March 2020 Areas served Places on the route Doncaster (All) Doncaster Frenchgate Bessacarr (57c, 57f, 58a, 58c, 58f) Interchange Cantley (All) Doncaster Racecourse Parrots Corner (57a, 57c) The Dome Auckley (57a, 57c, 57f, 58f) Blaxton (57f, 58f) Doncaster South Park & Ride Finningley (57a, 57f, 58f) Doncaster Sheffield Airport Doncaster iPort What’s changed 57a - No changes 57c - Change to the Monday - Friday, 1430 journey only 57f - Changes to the school journeys from Finningley to Doncaster 58a, 58c & 58f - No changes Operator(s) Some journeys operated with financial support from South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive How can I get more information? TravelSouthYorkshire @TSYalerts 01709 51 51 51 Bus route map for service 57a, 57c, 57f, 58a, 58c, 58f 04/08/2016 Hatfield Woodhouse Kirk Sandall Arksey Dunsville Westgate Sandtoft Edenthorpe Bentley Belton Doncaster, Frenchgate Interchange Lindholme Armthorpe 57a 57c 57a,58a Belle Vue, Bennetthorpe/ 57f 58a 57c,58c Grand St Leger Hotel Epworth 58c 58f 57f Intake Cantley, Goodison Boulevard/Staunton Rd Belle Vue, Booth Av/ Epworth, Blow Row 57f Gliwice Way 57a 57c 58a Wroot Low Burnham, A161 58c Lakeside 57a 58c Auckley, Main St/River Way 58f 57c Branton 57f 57f Auckley, Main St/Ellers Ln 58a 57a 58a 58c 57a,57c 57c 58c 57f 58f 57f 58f Blaxton, Bank End Rd/Hillscroft Rd 58f Balby 58a 57a Haxey Bessacarr, 58c 57c Finningley, Cammidge Way/ 58c 58f Hurst Ln/ East Stayers Road Finningley Poplar Way Lorem ipsum Lound 57f 58f Westwoodside,
    [Show full text]
  • Finningley Court
    A18 A614 Doncaster Doncaster M18 Racecourse Lakeside A638 Thorne Road Bawtry Road Yorkshire Auckley Wildlife Park Blaxton Bank End Road Why Swan? J3 M18 Finningley Crafting last‑a‑lifetime memories. J2 Great Yorkshire Way Great North Road Doncaster Rossington Sheeld Airport Bawtry Road A614 A1(M) A638 Misson A60 Tickhill Bawtry Finningley Court Craftsmanship is at the heart of Station Road Blaxton our approach – from our traditional Doncaster techniques, quality materials and the DN9 3AQ meticulous finish of each living space. That’s why no two houses are exactly the same. Whether it’s the brickwork, paintwork, façade or porch, we’ve created homes individual to you. From our own workshop, we work hard to make houses that will last. With our passion for craft and more than thirty years’ Call 0330 606 1401 Finningley Court experience, we turn them into homes that you’ll love. [email protected] What’s more we embrace twenty‑first century swanhomes.co.uk Blaxton living and we always go the extra mile. That’s why each one of our homes features high spec kitchens and bathrooms; intelligent heating and is wired to be smart‑home ready. All site plans, floor plans and any related property literature are for guidance only. Drawings and plans are not to scale and any dimensions, areas or distances given are approximate and for identification only. All this because we care about creating Artist’s impressions, images and CGI’s are for illustration purposes only and intended as a guide. your family home as much as you do.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Impact Assessment, Finningley Airport
    and with technical support from THE UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD and PUBLIC HEALTH GIS UNIT GIS Expertise & High Quality Research for Public Health HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT, FINNINGLEY AIRPORT September 2000 Dr Muna I. Abdel Aziz, MBBS, MD Specialist Registrar in Public Health, Doncaster Health Authority Dr John Radford, MBChB, MRCGP, FFPHM, DRCOG Director of Health Policy & Public Health, Doncaster Health Authority Mr John McCabe, MIEH, AMIOA Health and Public Protection, DMBC On behalf of Finningley HIA Steering Group & HIA Working Group Doncaster Health Authority White Rose House Ten Pound Walk Doncaster DN4 5DJ Tel: 01302 320111 Fax: 01302 730362 CONTENTS .......................................................................................................................... 1 1. LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS............................................................................................... 2 2. SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................. 2 3. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 8 4. OBJECTIVES OF FINNINGLEY HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT.............................. 10 4.1 Aim of HIA ................................................................................................................ 10 4.2 Scope of HIA ............................................................................................................ 10 4.3 Objectives................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Durham Clergy of the Early Sixteenth Century 1494 - 1540
    Durham E-Theses The Durham clergy of the early sixteenth century 1494 - 1540 Stevens, Louise Marie How to cite: Stevens, Louise Marie (1979) The Durham clergy of the early sixteenth century 1494 - 1540, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/10174/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk The Durham Clergy of the Early Sixteenth Century 1494 - 1540 Louise Marie Stevens A thesis presented in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of M.A. in the University of Durham Department of History 1979 The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. Abstract Sixteenth century polemicists and later historians have traditionally denounced the Pre-Reformation clergy as being morally bankrupt, financially rapacious, and generally lacking in vocation.
    [Show full text]