Binocular Astronomy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
August 10Th 2019 August 2019 7:00Pm at the Herrett Center for Arts & Science College of Southern Idaho
Snake River Skies The Newsletter of the Magic Valley Astronomical Society www.mvastro.org Membership Meeting MVAS President’s Message August 2019 Saturday, August 10th 2019 7:00pm at the Herrett Center for Arts & Science College of Southern Idaho. Colleagues, Public Star Party follows at the I hope you found the third week of July exhilarating. The 50th Anniversary of the first Centennial Observatory moon landing was the common theme. I capped my observance by watching the C- SPAN replay of the CBS broadcast. It was not only exciting to watch the landing, but Club Officers to listen to Walter Cronkite and Wally Schirra discuss what Neil Armstrong and Buzz Robert Mayer, President Aldrin was relaying back to us. It was fascinating to hear what we have either accepted or rejected for years come across as something brand new. Hearing [email protected] Michael Collins break in from his orbit above in the command module also reminded me of the major role he played and yet others in the past have often overlooked – Gary Leavitt, Vice President fortunately, he is now receiving the respect he deserves. If you didn’t catch that, [email protected] then hopefully you caught some other commemoration, such as Turner Classic Movies showing For All Mankind, a spellbinding documentary of what it was like for Dr. Jay Hartwell, Secretary all of the Apollo astronauts who made it to the moon. Jim Tubbs, Treasurer / ALCOR For me, these moments of commemoration made reading the moon landing’s [email protected] anniversary issue from the Association of Lunar and Planetary Observers (ALPO) 208-404-2999 come to life as they wrote about the features these astronauts were examining – including the little craters named after the three astronauts. -
Spatial Distribution of Galactic Globular Clusters: Distance Uncertainties and Dynamical Effects
Juliana Crestani Ribeiro de Souza Spatial Distribution of Galactic Globular Clusters: Distance Uncertainties and Dynamical Effects Porto Alegre 2017 Juliana Crestani Ribeiro de Souza Spatial Distribution of Galactic Globular Clusters: Distance Uncertainties and Dynamical Effects Dissertação elaborada sob orientação do Prof. Dr. Eduardo Luis Damiani Bica, co- orientação do Prof. Dr. Charles José Bon- ato e apresentada ao Instituto de Física da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul em preenchimento do requisito par- cial para obtenção do título de Mestre em Física. Porto Alegre 2017 Acknowledgements To my parents, who supported me and made this possible, in a time and place where being in a university was just a distant dream. To my dearest friends Elisabeth, Robert, Augusto, and Natália - who so many times helped me go from "I give up" to "I’ll try once more". To my cats Kira, Fen, and Demi - who lazily join me in bed at the end of the day, and make everything worthwhile. "But, first of all, it will be necessary to explain what is our idea of a cluster of stars, and by what means we have obtained it. For an instance, I shall take the phenomenon which presents itself in many clusters: It is that of a number of lucid spots, of equal lustre, scattered over a circular space, in such a manner as to appear gradually more compressed towards the middle; and which compression, in the clusters to which I allude, is generally carried so far, as, by imperceptible degrees, to end in a luminous center, of a resolvable blaze of light." William Herschel, 1789 Abstract We provide a sample of 170 Galactic Globular Clusters (GCs) and analyse its spatial distribution properties. -
A Basic Requirement for Studying the Heavens Is Determining Where In
Abasic requirement for studying the heavens is determining where in the sky things are. To specify sky positions, astronomers have developed several coordinate systems. Each uses a coordinate grid projected on to the celestial sphere, in analogy to the geographic coordinate system used on the surface of the Earth. The coordinate systems differ only in their choice of the fundamental plane, which divides the sky into two equal hemispheres along a great circle (the fundamental plane of the geographic system is the Earth's equator) . Each coordinate system is named for its choice of fundamental plane. The equatorial coordinate system is probably the most widely used celestial coordinate system. It is also the one most closely related to the geographic coordinate system, because they use the same fun damental plane and the same poles. The projection of the Earth's equator onto the celestial sphere is called the celestial equator. Similarly, projecting the geographic poles on to the celest ial sphere defines the north and south celestial poles. However, there is an important difference between the equatorial and geographic coordinate systems: the geographic system is fixed to the Earth; it rotates as the Earth does . The equatorial system is fixed to the stars, so it appears to rotate across the sky with the stars, but of course it's really the Earth rotating under the fixed sky. The latitudinal (latitude-like) angle of the equatorial system is called declination (Dec for short) . It measures the angle of an object above or below the celestial equator. The longitud inal angle is called the right ascension (RA for short). -
121012-AAS-221 Program-14-ALL, Page 253 @ Preflight
221ST MEETING OF THE AMERICAN ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY 6-10 January 2013 LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA Scientific sessions will be held at the: Long Beach Convention Center 300 E. Ocean Blvd. COUNCIL.......................... 2 Long Beach, CA 90802 AAS Paper Sorters EXHIBITORS..................... 4 Aubra Anthony ATTENDEE Alan Boss SERVICES.......................... 9 Blaise Canzian Joanna Corby SCHEDULE.....................12 Rupert Croft Shantanu Desai SATURDAY.....................28 Rick Fienberg Bernhard Fleck SUNDAY..........................30 Erika Grundstrom Nimish P. Hathi MONDAY........................37 Ann Hornschemeier Suzanne H. Jacoby TUESDAY........................98 Bethany Johns Sebastien Lepine WEDNESDAY.............. 158 Katharina Lodders Kevin Marvel THURSDAY.................. 213 Karen Masters Bryan Miller AUTHOR INDEX ........ 245 Nancy Morrison Judit Ries Michael Rutkowski Allyn Smith Joe Tenn Session Numbering Key 100’s Monday 200’s Tuesday 300’s Wednesday 400’s Thursday Sessions are numbered in the Program Book by day and time. Changes after 27 November 2012 are included only in the online program materials. 1 AAS Officers & Councilors Officers Councilors President (2012-2014) (2009-2012) David J. Helfand Quest Univ. Canada Edward F. Guinan Villanova Univ. [email protected] [email protected] PAST President (2012-2013) Patricia Knezek NOAO/WIYN Observatory Debra Elmegreen Vassar College [email protected] [email protected] Robert Mathieu Univ. of Wisconsin Vice President (2009-2015) [email protected] Paula Szkody University of Washington [email protected] (2011-2014) Bruce Balick Univ. of Washington Vice-President (2010-2013) [email protected] Nicholas B. Suntzeff Texas A&M Univ. suntzeff@aas.org Eileen D. Friel Boston Univ. [email protected] Vice President (2011-2014) Edward B. Churchwell Univ. of Wisconsin Angela Speck Univ. of Missouri [email protected] [email protected] Treasurer (2011-2014) (2012-2015) Hervey (Peter) Stockman STScI Nancy S. -
Binocular Universe: Surfing Serpens August 2010 Phil Harrington
Binocular Universe: Surfing Serpens August 2010 Phil Harrington erpens the Serpent has the unique distinction of being the sky’s only constellation that is sliced in half by a second star group, the constellation Ophiuchus, the Serpent Bearer. To the west of Ophiuchus is Serpens Caput, the Serpent's head. This sparse S area is highlighted by the fine globular cluster M5, which was discussed in the June 2010 edition of this column, as well as several variable stars that are within binocular range. East of Ophiuchus is Serpens Cauda, the Serpent’s tail. But even with the plane of the Milky Way passing through, Serpens Cauda still contains no bright stars and surprisingly few deep-sky objects. But what it lacks in quantity, Serpens Cauda more than makes up for in quality. Above: Summer star map from Star Watch by Phil Harrington Above: Finder chart for this month's Binocular Universe. Chart adapted from Touring the Universe through Binoculars Atlas (TUBA), www.philharrington.net/tuba.htm Let’s begin with open cluster IC 4756, a faint, but large mob of stars that’s perfect for binoculars. Unfortunately, its position is quite far from any handy reference stars, so finding it can be a challenge. Your best bet is to trace a line between Altair, in Aquila the Eagle, and second-magnitude Cebalrai [Beta (β) Ophiuchi]. IC 4756 lies just south of the halfway point between the two. There might not be many bright stars nearby, but the cluster's field overflows with faint stardust. Eighty suns scattered across an apparent diameter nearly twice that of the Full Moon form a faint mist against the backdrop of the summer Milky Way. -
Observing List to Confirm Visibility
ASSA Deepsky 100 Observing List Evening of 2014 Jun 27 at VS Star Party - Gansvlei Sunset 17:33, Twilight ends 18:51, Twilight begins 05:43, Sunrise 07:01, Moon rise 07:32, Moon set 17:55 Completely dark from 18:51 to 05:43. New Moon. All times local (GMT+2). Listing All Deep Sky Objects visible above the perfect horizon and in complete darkness after 18:51 and before 05:43. Cls Primary ID Alternate ID Con Mag Size RA 2000 Dec 2000 Distance Begin Optimum End S.A. Ur. 2 PSA Difficulty Open NGC 2287 M 41 CMa 5.0 39.0' 06h46m01.0s -20°45'24" 2300 ly 18:34 18:42 18:53 19 154 27 detectable Open NGC 2362 Collinder 136 CMa 3.8 5.0' 07h18m41.0s -24°57'18" 4500 ly 18:24 18:48 19:34 19 154 27 obvious Open NGC 2437 M 46 Pup 6.6 20.0' 07h41m46.0s -14°48'36" 4500 ly 18:37 18:49 19:10 12 135 26 detectable Open NGC 2422 M 47 Pup 4.3 25.0' 07h36m35.0s -14°29'00" 1600 ly 18:33 18:49 19:16 12 135 26 easy Open NGC 2447 M 93 Pup 6.5 10.0' 07h44m30.0s -23°51'24" 3400 ly 18:34 18:50 19:32 19 153 26 easy Open NGC 2548 M 48 Hya 5.5 30.0' 08h13m43.0s -05°45'00" 2500 ly 18:37 18:51 19:19 12 134 26 detectable Open NGC 2477 Collinder 165 Pup 5.7 15.0' 07h52m10.0s -38°31'48" 4000 ly 18:33 18:52 20:01 19 171 28 easy Open NGC 2451 Collinder 161 Pup 3.7 45.0' 07h45m23.0s -37°57'21" 720 ly 18:34 18:52 19:55 19 171 28 easy Open NGC 2547 Collinder 177 Vel 5.0 25.0' 08h10m09.0s -49°12'54" 1500 ly 18:35 18:54 19:08 20 187 28 easy Open NGC 2516 Collinder 172 Car 3.3 30.0' 07h58m04.0s -60°45'12" 1300 ly 18:32 18:56 19:08 24 200 30 obvious Open IC 2391 Collinder 191 Vel 2.6 -
Atlas Menor Was Objects to Slowly Change Over Time
C h a r t Atlas Charts s O b by j Objects e c t Constellation s Objects by Number 64 Objects by Type 71 Objects by Name 76 Messier Objects 78 Caldwell Objects 81 Orion & Stars by Name 84 Lepus, circa , Brightest Stars 86 1720 , Closest Stars 87 Mythology 88 Bimonthly Sky Charts 92 Meteor Showers 105 Sun, Moon and Planets 106 Observing Considerations 113 Expanded Glossary 115 Th e 88 Constellations, plus 126 Chart Reference BACK PAGE Introduction he night sky was charted by western civilization a few thou - N 1,370 deep sky objects and 360 double stars (two stars—one sands years ago to bring order to the random splatter of stars, often orbits the other) plotted with observing information for T and in the hopes, as a piece of the puzzle, to help “understand” every object. the forces of nature. The stars and their constellations were imbued with N Inclusion of many “famous” celestial objects, even though the beliefs of those times, which have become mythology. they are beyond the reach of a 6 to 8-inch diameter telescope. The oldest known celestial atlas is in the book, Almagest , by N Expanded glossary to define and/or explain terms and Claudius Ptolemy, a Greco-Egyptian with Roman citizenship who lived concepts. in Alexandria from 90 to 160 AD. The Almagest is the earliest surviving astronomical treatise—a 600-page tome. The star charts are in tabular N Black stars on a white background, a preferred format for star form, by constellation, and the locations of the stars are described by charts. -
Skytools Chart
22 Aquila - Scutum SkyTools 3 / Skyhound.com 7006 γ2 α IC 4997 γ1 δ ρ ε β ζ ζ Delphinus 6891 NGC 6738 ε δ γ γ NGC 6709 κ 6803 +10° ξ 6934 μ Blue Racquetball 6781 NGC 6633 β IC 4665 IC 4756 NGC 6755 θ1 Aquila θ2 Equuleus δ γ Collinder 359 6852 6790 Collinder 350 η 6760 ν Collinder 401 Phantom Streak +0° θ 6535 ι Serpens Cauda ζ λ β NGC 6704 6751 η NGC 6683 κ Wild Duck Cluster IC 1276 NGC 6664 6539 6712 ε α τ IC 4846 μ δ ζ 6517 ε M 26 ν -10° Scutum ν Saturn Nebula NGC 6625 2 NGC 6604 M 73 M72 ν α α1 Eagle Nebula Little Gem Star Queen Barnard's Galaxy γ β NGC 6605 τ h 8 υ Omega Nebula 1 M 17 52° x 34° 19h30m00.0s +00°00'00" (Skymark) Open Cl. Nebula Galaxy 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Globular Cl. Dark Neb. Quasar Globule Planetary 22 Aquila - Scutum GALASSIE Sigla Nome Cost. A.R. Dec. Mv. Dim. Tipo Distanza 200/4 80/11,5 20x60 NGC 6822 Barnard's Gal. Sgr 19h 47m 58s -14° 48' 11" +9,40 13',5x12',3 IB 4,4 Mly Er 20 (dif.) Er 20 (v. c.) (v. c.) AMMASSI APERTI Sigla Nome Cost. A.R. Dec. Mv. Dim. N° Æ Distanza 200/4 80/11,5 20x60 IC 4665 Oph 17h 46m 18s +05° 43' 00" +5,30 70',0 29 1.100 ly Er 20 (det.) Er 15,5 (det.) (dif.) Cr 350 Oph 17h 48m 06s +01° 18' 00" +6,10 39',0 --- 930 ly Er 12,4 (det.) Er 20 (det.) (dif.) Cr 359 Oph 18h 01m 06s +02° 54' 00" +3,00 240',0 --- 810 ly Er 20 (det.) Er 20 (det.) (det.) NGC 6604 Ser 18h 18m 04s -12° 14' 30" +7,50 5',0 30 5.500 ly Er 20 (easy) Er 20 (easy) (det.) NGC 6605 Ser 18h 18m 21s -14° 56' 42" +6,00 15',0 12 --- Er 20 (dif.) Er 20 (cha.) (cha.) M 16 Star Queen Ser 18h 18m 48s -13° 48' 24" +6,50 6',0 60 5.700 ly Er 20 (obv.) Er 20 (easy) (easy) M 17 Sgr 18h 20m 47s -16° 10' 18" +7,30 25',0 --- 4.200 Or 6 (dif.) Er 20 (cha.) (v. -
108 Afocal Procedure, 105 Age of Globular Clusters, 25, 28–29 O
Index Index Achromats, 70, 73, 79 Apochromats (APO), 70, Averted vision Adhafera, 44 73, 79 technique, 96, 98, Adobe Photoshop Aquarius, 43, 99 112 (software), 108 Aquila, 10, 36, 45, 65 Afocal procedure, 105 Arches cluster, 23 B1620-26, 37 Age Archinal, Brent, 63, 64, Barkhatova (Bar) of globular clusters, 89, 195 catalogue, 196 25, 28–29 Arcturus, 43 Barlow lens, 78–79, 110 of open clusters, Aricebo radio telescope, Barnard’s Galaxy, 49 15–16 33 Basel (Bas) catalogue, 196 of star complexes, 41 Aries, 45 Bayer classification of stellar associations, Arp 2, 51 system, 93 39, 41–42 Arp catalogue, 197 Be16, 63 of the universe, 28 Arp-Madore (AM)-1, 33 Beehive Cluster, 13, 60, Aldebaran, 43 Arp-Madore (AM)-2, 148 Alessi, 22, 61 48, 65 Bergeron 1, 22 Alessi catalogue, 196 Arp-Madore (AM) Bergeron, J., 22 Algenubi, 44 catalogue, 197 Berkeley 11, 124f, 125 Algieba, 44 Asterisms, 43–45, Berkeley 17, 15 Algol (Demon Star), 65, 94 Berkeley 19, 130 21 Astronomy (magazine), Berkeley 29, 18 Alnilam, 5–6 89 Berkeley 42, 171–173 Alnitak, 5–6 Astronomy Now Berkeley (Be) catalogue, Alpha Centauri, 25 (magazine), 89 196 Alpha Orionis, 93 Astrophotography, 94, Beta Pictoris, 42 Alpha Persei, 40 101, 102–103 Beta Piscium, 44 Altair, 44 Astroplanner (software), Betelgeuse, 93 Alterf, 44 90 Big Bang, 5, 29 Altitude-Azimuth Astro-Snap (software), Big Dipper, 19, 43 (Alt-Az) mount, 107 Binary millisecond 75–76 AstroStack (software), pulsars, 30 Andromeda Galaxy, 36, 108 Binary stars, 8, 52 39, 41, 48, 52, 61 AstroVideo (software), in globular clusters, ANR 1947 -
Making a Sky Atlas
Appendix A Making a Sky Atlas Although a number of very advanced sky atlases are now available in print, none is likely to be ideal for any given task. Published atlases will probably have too few or too many guide stars, too few or too many deep-sky objects plotted in them, wrong- size charts, etc. I found that with MegaStar I could design and make, specifically for my survey, a “just right” personalized atlas. My atlas consists of 108 charts, each about twenty square degrees in size, with guide stars down to magnitude 8.9. I used only the northernmost 78 charts, since I observed the sky only down to –35°. On the charts I plotted only the objects I wanted to observe. In addition I made enlargements of small, overcrowded areas (“quad charts”) as well as separate large-scale charts for the Virgo Galaxy Cluster, the latter with guide stars down to magnitude 11.4. I put the charts in plastic sheet protectors in a three-ring binder, taking them out and plac- ing them on my telescope mount’s clipboard as needed. To find an object I would use the 35 mm finder (except in the Virgo Cluster, where I used the 60 mm as the finder) to point the ensemble of telescopes at the indicated spot among the guide stars. If the object was not seen in the 35 mm, as it usually was not, I would then look in the larger telescopes. If the object was not immediately visible even in the primary telescope – a not uncommon occur- rence due to inexact initial pointing – I would then scan around for it. -
ASSA Top 100 Deep Sky Objects
# Object ID Bennett ID Type Size Con RA Dec D Vis Interesting Facts Distance from Discoverer Earth (light- years) 1 NGC 55, LEDA 1014 Glxy 32’x5.6’ Scl 00 15 – 39 11 06,25 Sep–Feb The String of Pearls. A barred galaxy that is 7200000 James Dunlop on August 4, 1826 edge-on to us. It has a bright elongated center with a small round cloud to the east of it. If you look to the side of it while still concentrating on the object you might be able to see additional bright clouds and dark Ben 1 rifts in this galaxy. 2 NGC 104, 47 Tucanae Glcl 31’ Tuc 00 24 – 72 05 05,06 Sep–Feb The cluster appears roughly the size of the 16700 Abbe Lacaille from South Africa, 1751. At the full moon in the sky under ideal conditions. Cape, Abbé wanted to test Newton's theory of It is the second brightest globular cluster in gravitation and verify the shape of the earth in the the sky (after Omega Centauri), and is southern hemisphere. His results suggested the noted for having a very bright and dense Earth was egg-shaped not oval. In 1838, Thomas core. It is also one of the most massive Maclear who was Astronomer Royal at the Cape, globular clusters in the Milky Way, repeated the measurements. He found that de containing millions of stars Lacaille had failed to take into account the gravitational attraction of the nearby mountains. Ben 2 3 NGC 247, LEDA 2758 Glxy 18’ x 5’ Cet 00 47 – 20 46 06,25 Sep–Feb Very dusty galaxy therefore not bright, 11000000 ? Ben 3 magnitude 9.2, challenging to find. -
Dynamical Modelling of Stellar Systems in the Gaia Era
Dynamical modelling of stellar systems in the Gaia era Eugene Vasiliev Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge Synopsis Overview of dynamical modelling Overview of the Gaia mission Examples: Large Magellanic Cloud Globular clusters Measurement of the Milky Way gravitational potential Fred Hoyle vs. the Universe What does \dynamical modelling" mean? It does not refer to a simulation (e.g. N-body) of the evolution of a stellar system. Most often, it means \modelling a stellar system in a dynamical equilibrium" (used interchangeably with \steady state"). vs. the Universe What does \dynamical modelling" mean? It does not refer to a simulation (e.g. N-body) of the evolution of a stellar system. Most often, it means \modelling a stellar system in a dynamical equilibrium" (used interchangeably with \steady state"). Fred Hoyle What does \dynamical modelling" mean? It does not refer to a simulation (e.g. N-body) of the evolution of a stellar system. Most often, it means \modelling a stellar system in a dynamical equilibrium" (used interchangeably with \steady state"). Fred Hoyle vs. the Universe 3D Steady-state assumption =) Jeans theorem: f (x; v)= f I(x; v;Φ) observations: 3D { 6D integrals of motion (≤ 3D?), e.g., I = fE; L;::: g Why steady state? Distribution function of stars f (x; v; t) satisfies [sometimes] the collisionless Boltzmann equation: @f (x; v; t) @f (x; v; t) @Φ(x; t) @f (x; v; t) + v − = 0: @t @x @x @v Potential , mass distribution @f (x; v; t) ; t ; t ; t + @t 3D observations: 3D { 6D integrals of motion (≤ 3D?), e.g., I = fE; L;:::