DOCSLIB.ORG

Models of Government Structure at the Local Level

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Models of Government Structure at the Local Level MODELS OF GOVERNMENT The concentration or proximity of people and STRUCTURE AT THE LOCAL firms in cities increases social and economic LEVEL1 interaction and results in the exchange of ideas among people working in different fields in the By same location. This exchange of ideas is essential for innovation. Enid Slack Enid Slack Consulting Inc. To attract businesses, cities not only have to ([email protected]) ensure access to skilled labour and transportation and communications INTRODUCTION infrastructure but they also have to provide those services that attract and retain highly trained Interest in cities around the world has 4 increased significantly over the last decade. This human capital. According to Richard Florida, interest has arisen in part because more and the knowledge workers are attracted by quality more people are living in cities and, in part, of life factors such as diversity, tolerance, a because it is increasingly understood that large lively arts scene, recreational opportunities, high cities and city-regions2 are the major drivers of quality public schools, strong neighbourhoods, economic prosperity for the countries in which and safety from crime. As Savitch and Kantor they are located. note: “where you live and work matters more than ever in accessing jobs, income, public 5 Globalization has fundamentally changed amenities, schools, and green space.” the role of cities. In the new knowledge-based economy, knowledge and learning are key In this context, local governments have an determinants of economic success. Firms are no important role to play. Not only do they have to longer competing only on the basis of achieving ensure access to skilled labour and the lowest cost, but they also are competing on transportation and communications the basis of their ability to innovate: to come up infrastructure but they also have to provide those with new products and to deliver them in a services that attract and retain highly trained timely manner.3 Cities are key to innovation – human capital. This means that cities need the they are places where workers, capital, financial resources that will enable them to build institutions and infrastructure come together to and maintain the infrastructure and to deliver the provide the foundation for economic activity. services that will attract skilled individuals and firms. The appropriate local government structure will help them to do this. 1 This paper was first prepared under the auspices of The Consortium for Economic Policy Research and Good local governance also has a role to Advice (CEPRA) in October 2003 -- a project of play. The main contribution of local governance cooperation and technical assistance sponsored by the is to the livability of cities in terms of health and Canadian International Development Agency safety, recreational opportunities, environmental (CIDA). The project is being carried out by the Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada health other factors that contribute to the quality (AUCC), working in conjunction with experts in of life. The type of government structure for academia, government and the non-governmental cities will have an effect on the efficiency with sector in both Canada and the Russian Federation. which services are provided and on the ability to share the costs throughout the entire region in a 2 City-regions generally refer to a defined urban fair and efficient way. Governing structure also centre with smaller adjacent urban and rural areas. 3 See Gertler, Meric S., Richard Florida, Gary Gates, 4 Florida, Richard, The Rise of the Creative Class. and Tara Vinodrai. “Competing on Creativity: New York: Basic Books, 2002. Placing Ontario’s Cities in North American Context.” A report prepared for the Ontario Ministry of 5 Savitch, H.V. and Paul Kantor, Cities in the Enterprise, Opportunity and Innovation and the International Marketplace: The Political Economy of Institute for Competitiveness and Prosperity, Urban Development in North America and Western Toronto, 2002. Europe, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2002, p. 16. Working Paper 2004(4) © 2004 IIGR, Queen’s University Enid Slack, Models of Government Structure at the Local Level has an impact on citizen access and government now way intended to be comprehensive, accountability for the expenditure and taxing they do illustrate some interesting decisions it makes. experiments with different types of structures. The purpose of this study is to compare • The fifth part draws some general different models of government structure at the conclusions about governing structures local level and to evaluate their advantages and around the world. disadvantages. The study will focus mainly on government structures in large cities but will It should be noted at the outset that the also look at governance in smaller, remote discussion of government structure around the communities. Examples of different cities world makes clear that different structures have around the world will be used to illustrate how worked in different places at different times. different government structures work in practice. Indeed, individual cities have tried different structures at different times. It is thus very The outline of the paper is as follows: difficult to generalize from the examples provided because there is not one model that • The first part sets out the standard public stands above the rest. The appropriate governing finance criteria for designing government structure in any one municipality will depend on structure: subsidiarity and local its specific characteristics – the nature of the responsiveness, economies of scale, services it provides, the revenue sources externalities, equity, access and available to it, the size and location of the accountability. Some of these criteria call municipality, the size of the municipality for large government units to deliver relative to the state/province or country as a services; others suggest small government whole, the nature of intergovernmental relations, units would work better. the history of cooperation with neighbouring municipalities, and other factors. • The second part discusses the application of the above criteria to communities of CRITERIA TO EVALUATE DIFFERENT different size and location. In particular, MODELS OF GOVERNMENT the circumstances of large metropolitan STRUCTURE areas on the one hand and small remote In terms of economic theory, the major role communities on the other hand are assigned to regional or local governments is to considered. provide goods and services within a particular geographic area to residents who are willing to • The third part describes and reviews the pay for them.6 If the benefits of particular advantages and disadvantages of four services are confined to local jurisdictions (in models of government structure: two-tier other words, the benefits do not spill over into governments, one-tier governments, neighbouring jurisdictions), efficiency is voluntary cooperation (including inter- enhanced because the mix and level of services municipal agreements) and special can vary according to local preferences. Local purpose districts. It also considers the role officials are in a better position to respond to of senior levels of government. As part of local tastes and preferences than are officials of the discussion, examples are provided senior levels of government.7 from different cities around the world. 6 • The fourth part provides more in-depth Bird, Richard M. and Enid Slack, Urban Public descriptions of how different models work Finance in Canada, Toronto: John Wiley and Sons, 1993, p. 16. in four cities: Toronto (Canada), Vancouver (Canada), London (England), 7 The provision of local services does not mean that and Minneapolis-Saint Paul (USA). It also the municipality has to produce the goods and provides one example of governing services themselves, however. Rather, the role of communities in remote areas: Ontario local government is to make decisions about which (Canada). Although these examples are in services to provide and how to provide them. Municipalities could, for example, contract out Working Paper 2004(4) © 2004 IIGR, Queen’s University 2 Enid Slack, Models of Government Structure at the Local Level public services should be provided at the local According to this theory, the main objective level with local policy-makers making decisions in designing the optimal government structure is about what services to provide, how much to to maximize the welfare of individuals. The provide, and who should pay for them. welfare of individuals is assumed to depend, at least in part, on the satisfaction they receive Public choice theory argues that small-scale, from local public goods and services. The fragmented local governments have special optimal level of government is that which advantages for local democracy because they provides the desired level of local public goods maintain a quasi-market. The proliferation of and services at the least cost. Within this general small government units in a metropolitan area framework, several criteria can be used to design results in competition among them. Tiebout, for government structure: subsidiarity and local example, suggested that people "vote with their responsiveness, economies of scale, feet," meaning that they move to the jurisdiction externalities, equity, access, and accountability. with the tax and expenditure package that most closely resembles what they want.9 This Subsidiarity Principle and Local competition benefits
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Toward City Charters in Canada
    Journal of Law and Social Policy Volume 34 Toronto v Ontario: Implications for Canadian Local Democracy Guest Editors: Alexandra Flynn & Mariana Article 8 Valverde 2021 Toward City Charters in Canada John Sewell Chartercitytoronto.ca Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/jlsp Part of the Law Commons Citation Information Sewell, John. "Toward City Charters in Canada." Journal of Law and Social Policy 34. (2021): 134-164. https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/jlsp/vol34/iss1/8 This Voices and Perspectives is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Law and Social Policy by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. Sewell: Toward City Charters in Canada Toward City Charters in Canada JOHN SEWELL FOR MORE THAN 30 YEARS, there has been discussion about how cities in Canada can gain more authority and the freedom, powers, and resources necessary to govern their own affairs. The problem goes back to the time of Confederation in 1867, when eighty per cent of Canadians lived in rural areas. Powerful provinces were needed to unite the large, sparsely populated countryside, to pool resources, and to provide good government. Toronto had already become a city in 1834 with a democratically elected government, but its 50,000 people were only around three per cent of Ontario’s 1.6 million. Confederation negotiations did not even consider the idea of conferring governmental power to Toronto or other municipalities, dividing it instead solely between the soon-to-be provinces and the new central government.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Geography of Office Location and The
    Prepared by: Canadian Urban Institute The New Geography of Office Location 555 Richmond St. W., Suite 402, PO Box 612 and the Consequences of Toronto, ON M5V 3B1 Canada Business as Usual in the GTA 416-365-0816 416-365-0650 [email protected] This reportMarch has 2011 been prepared for the Toronto Office Coalition, March 18, 2011. http://www.canurb.org Research Team: Canadian Urban Institute Glenn R. Miller, Vice President, Education & Research, FCIP, RPP Iain Myrans, Senior Planner, MCIP, RPP Juan Carlos Molina, Geospatial Analyst, MSA Thomas Sullivan, GIS & Policy Analyst, B Sc Danielle Berger, GIS Research Assistant Mike Dror, GIS Research Assistant Real Estate Search Corporation Iain Dobson, Principal & Senior Associate, Canadian Urban Institute Hammersmith Communications Philippa Campsie, Principal & Senior Associate, Canadian Urban Institute All photography in this document by Iain Myrans. This report has been prepared for the Toronto Office Coalition, March 18, 2011. Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Summary of Recommendations.............................................................................................................. 7 1. Business Competitiveness in the GTA, Five Years On............................................................................. 9 2. Changes and trends since 2005 .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • International Conference on Structural Reform and the Transformation of Organisations and Business
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Papers in Economics International Conference on Structural Reform and the Transformation of Organisations and Business Homerton College, University of Cambridge, U.K September 3 –6, 2003 THE RELEVANCE OF TORONTO’S NEW GOVERMENTAL STRUCTURE FOR THE 21ST CENTURY By HARVEY SCHWARTZ York University 1 Introduction The government of Ontario has made a number of major changes in the way that municipalities are governed and financed. Some municipalities have been forced to amalgamate despite opposition from their residents. Ontario has also redistributed the responsibilities of the province and the municipalities through the Local Service Realignment Program (LSR). This program is referred to as downloading. Other major changes include the use of market value for property tax assessment and the transfer of education funding to the province from the local school boards. This paper is concerned with two aspects of the changes. The first question is whether megacities are less costly to operate than many small municipalities in a large urban area. The recent amalgamation of Toronto is used to examine this question. Since the amalgamation occurred in 1998, the new city is still adjusting to the change, and only preliminary conclusions can be drawn at this time. The second question is concerned with the impact of downloading on the municipalities. The experience of the new City of Toronto is again used to examine this question. 1 The Organization of Local Government Municipalities, their residents, the provincial governments and academics have been concerned with the costs and benefits of a megacity compared with many small and diverse municipalities within a large metropolitan area.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 City of Toronto Art Collection Management Policy and Historical
    CITY CLERK Clause embodied in Report No. 6 of the Economic Development and Parks Committee, as adopted by the Council of the City of Toronto at its meeting held on June 18, 19 and 20, 2002. 10 City of Toronto Art Collection Management Policy and Historical Collection Management and Development Policies (All Wards) (City Council on June 18, 19 and 20, 2002, amended this Clause by adding thereto the following: “It is further recommended that the following motion be referred to the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism for report thereon to the Economic Development and Parks Committee, such report to address the development of a strategy for ongoing enhancement of the City of Toronto’s art collection: Moved by Councillor Moscoe: ‘It is recommended that the City art collection apply for an annual major cultural grant approximately equivalent to grants provided to each of the “Big 5” cultural organizations, for the acquisition of art for the City of Toronto’s permanent art collection.’ ”) The Economic Development and Parks Committee recommends the adoption of the following report (May 6, 2002) from the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism, subject to adding the following: “including opportunities for collaboration and co-operation with the Royal Ontario Museum and the Art Gallery of Ontario.”: Purpose: This report seeks approval for the City of Toronto Art Collection Management Policy, the Historical Collection Management Policy and the Historical Collection Development Policy. Financial Implications and Impact Statement: There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Rooming Houses in Toronto, 1997–2018
    Rooming houses in Toronto, 1997–2018 Philippa Campsie Research Paper 242 April 2018 Funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada through the Neighbourhood Change Research Partnership www.neighbourhoodchange.ca ISSN 0316-0068; ISBN 978-0-7727-9128-3 Neighbourhood Change Research Partnership ii Rooming houses in Toronto, 1997– 2 0 1 8 Rooming houses in Toronto, 1997–2018 Philippa Campsie April 2018, vi, 81 pp. ISSN 0316-0068 ISBN 978-0-7727-9128-3 Neighbourhood Change Research Partnership Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work University of Toronto 248 Bloor Street West Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1V4 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://neighbourhoodchange.ca This study and its dissemination is supported by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humani- ties Research Council of Canada which has funded the Neighbourhood Change Research Partnership based at the University of Toronto (J. David Hulchanski, Principal Investigator). The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the research team, the advisory board members, the university, or the funder. Neighbourhood Change Research Partnership Rooming houses in Toronto, 1997 – 2 0 1 8 iii Executive Summary In 1998, amalgamation brought together six cities to form the new City of Toronto. Rooming houses had been permitted and licensed since the 1970s in the former City of Toronto, which became the core of the amalgamated city. In the former cities of Etobicoke and York, they were permitted to some extent, but in the former cities of North York, East York, and Scarborough, rooming houses were not permitted.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Assessment of the New City of Toronto
    A Preliminary Assessment of the New City of Toronto Enid Slack Enid Slack Consulting Inc. 214 King Street West, Suite 214 Toronto, ON M5H 3S6 On January 1, 1998, the new City of Toronto came into being by replacing the former metropolitan level of government and its constituent lower-tier munici- palities (Toronto, Etobicoke, North York, Scarborough, York and East York) with a single-tier city.1 This restructuring was not initiated by local initiative but by the provincial government through the passage of Bill 103, the City of To- ronto Act, 1996. 2 Indeed, opposition to the proposed amalgamation came from many different quarters: local municipalities (both inside and outside of Metro Toronto), the opposition parties, citizen organisations, and from within the Conservative party itself (see Stevenson and Gilbert 1999; Sancton 1998). The major citizen opposition was led by a former mayor of Toronto, John Sewell, who was behind the formation of the Citizens for Local Democracy in late 1996. Sewell’s opposition to amalgamation centred on the loss of local identity and 1. The new City of Tor onto is con tained within the G reate r To ron to Ar ea (G TA ) whic h is comprised of the City of Toronto plus the two-tier regions of Durham, Halton, Peel and York. The pop ulation of To ron to in 1999 was 2,385,421. The populations of the other regions of the GTA are: Durham -- 452,608; Halton -- 329,613; Peel -- 869,219; and York -- 618,497. These estimates, which were taken from the 1999 Ontario Municipal Directory, show that the population of Toronto represents about half of the population of the GTA.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Geography of Office Location and The
    Prepared by: Canadian Urban Institute The New Geography of Office Location 555 Richmond St. W., Suite 402, PO Box 612 and the Consequences of Toronto, ON M5V 3B1 Canada Business as Usual in the GTA 416-365-0816 416-365-0650 [email protected] This reportMarch has 2011 been prepared for the Toronto Office Coalition, March 18, 2011. http://www.canurb.org Research Team: Canadian Urban Institute Glenn R. Miller, Vice President, Education & Research, FCIP, RPP Iain Myrans, Senior Planner, MCIP, RPP Juan Carlos Molina, Geospatial Analyst, MSA Thomas Sullivan, GIS & Policy Analyst, B Sc Danielle Berger, GIS Research Assistant Mike Dror, GIS Research Assistant Real Estate Search Corporation Iain Dobson, Principal & Senior Associate, Canadian Urban Institute Hammersmith Communications Philippa Campsie, Principal & Senior Associate, Canadian Urban Institute All photography in this document by Iain Myrans. This report has been prepared for the Toronto Office Coalition, March 18, 2011. Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Summary of Recommendations.............................................................................................................. 7 1. Business Competitiveness in the GTA, Five Years On............................................................................. 9 2. Changes and trends since 2005 .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DIVERCITIES: Dealing with Urban Diversity: the Case of Toronto
    DIVERCITIES Governing Urban Diversity: governing urban diversity Creating Social Cohesion, Social Mobility and Economic Performance in Today’s Hyper-diversified Cities Dealing with Urban Diversity Dealing with This book is one of the outcomes of the DIVERCITIES project. It focuses on the question of how to create social cohesion, social Urban Diversity • mobility and economic performance in today’s hyper-diversified cities. The Case of Toronto The Case of Toronto The project’s central hypothesis is that urban diversity is an asset; it can inspire creativity, innovation and make cities more liveable. There are fourteen books in this series: Antwerp, Athens, Budapest, Copenhagen, Istanbul, Leipzig, London, Milan, Tuna Tasan-Kok Paris, Rotterdam, Tallinn, Toronto, Warsaw and Zurich. Sara Ozogul This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under www.urbandivercities.eu grant agreement No. 319970. SSH.2012.2.2.2-1; Governance of cohesion and diversity in urban contexts. DIVERCITIES: Dealing with Urban Diversity The Case of Toronto Tuna Tasan-Kok Sara Ozogul Governing Urban Diversity: Creating Social Cohesion, Social Mobility and Economic Performance in Today’s Hyper-diversified Cities To be cited as: Tasan-Kok, T. and Ozogul, S. (2017). Lead Partner DIVERCITIES, Living with Urban Diversity: The case - Utrecht University, The Netherlands of Toronto. Amsterdam and Delft: University of Amsterdam and TU Delft. Consortium Partners This report has been put together by the authors, - University of Vienna, Austria and revised on the basis of the valuable comments, suggestions, and contributions of all DIVERCITIES - University of Antwerp, Belgium partners.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cases of Montreal and Toronto
    ARTICLE IN PRESS PROGRESS IN PLANNING Progress in Planning 66 (2006) 7–59 www.elsevier.com/locate/pplann Comparing metropolitan governance: The cases of Montreal and Toronto Julie-Anne Boudreau, Pierre HamelÃ, Bernard Jouve, Roger Keil Universite de Montreal Sociology, Pavillon Lionel-Groulx, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 3150 CHAPTER 1 Introduction The transformation of metropolitan governance cannot be understood without adopting a double reading frame referring on the one hand to the actual content of policies aimed at the metropolitan scale, their raison d’eˆtre, the macro-economic logics that underlie them, and on the other hand to the configurations of actors and institutions which evolved strongly in the last 20 years. Essentially, the metropolitan level, beyond the municipal, progressively became (and not without conflict or opposition) the new territory of reference for political leaders as well as for economic ones.1 Big cities bring pressures for a new configuration of intergovernmental relations. In this institutional and political flux, the main challenge of public policy-making is to stabilize a place for exchanges between institutions. There seem to be an emerging political space at the metropolitan scale, where collective action and claims for local democracy unfold. The recent reforms have created more and more organized local and metropolitan societies. Metropolitanization also means an internal reconstitu- tion of the political sphere and its articulation with civil society. There is a diversification of local and metropolitan responsibilities and activities, from the à Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 514 343 6423; fax: +1 514 343 5722. E-mail address: [email protected] (P. Hamel).
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Service Delivery and the Myth of Water Utility Independence
    LEAKY GOVERNANCE ALTERNATIVE SERVICE DELIVERY AND THE MYTH OF WATER UTILITY INDEPENDENCE Kathryn Furlong Sample Material © 2016 UBC Press © UBC Press 2016 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without prior written permission of the publisher. Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Furlong, Kathryn, author Leaky governance : alternative service delivery and the myth of water utility independence / Kathryn Furlong. Includes bibliographical references and index. Issued in print and electronic formats. ISBN 978-0-7748-3148-2 (bound). – ISBN 978-0-7748-3150-5 (pdf). ISBN 978-0-7748-3151-2 (epub) 1. Water utilities – Ontario. 2. Water-supply – Economic aspects – Ontario. 3. Water-supply – Government policy – Ontario. 4. Water-supply – Ontario – Management. 5. Municipal government – Ontario. 6. Privatization – Ontario. I. Title. HD4465.C3F89 2016 363.6ʹ109713 C2015-903890-1 C2015-903891-X UBC Press gratefully acknowledges the financial support for our publishing program of the Government of Canada (through the Canada Book Fund), the Canada Council for the Arts, and the British Columbia Arts Council. This book has been published with the help of a grant from the Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences, through the Awards to Scholarly Publications Program, using funds provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, and with the help of the University of British Columbia through the
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Urban History
    Journal of Urban History http://juh.sagepub.com Constructing Urban Expertise: Professional and Political Authority in Toronto, 1940-1970 Stephen Bocking Journal of Urban History 2006; 33; 51 DOI: 10.1177/0096144206290265 The online version of this article can be found at: http://juh.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/33/1/51 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com On behalf of: The Urban History Association Additional services and information for Journal of Urban History can be found at: Email Alerts: http://juh.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://juh.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations (this article cites 11 articles hosted on the SAGE Journals Online and HighWire Press platforms): http://juh.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/33/1/51 Downloaded from http://juh.sagepub.com by on February 7, 2008 © 2006 SAGE Publications. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized distribution. CONSTRUCTING URBAN EXPERTISE Professional and Political Authority in Toronto, 1940-1970 STEPHEN BOCKING Trent University Between 1940 and 1970, the population of the Toronto metropolitan region increased rapidly. This imposed new infrastructure demands, particularly for sewer, water supply, and transportation systems, and encouraged comprehensive approaches to planning and flood control. Several forms of expertise emerged to guide responses to these demands, of which three are considered here: engineering of urban services, planning of new communities, and watershed conservation. Each form of expertise had close ties to public- or private-sector institutions; collectively, they reinforced prevailing views concerning the public interest and the role of technocratic expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Regime-Building As a Strategy of Intergovernmental Reform: the Case of Toronto’S Role in Immigrant Settlement
    Urban Regime-Building as a Strategy of Intergovernmental Reform: The Case of Toronto’s Role in Immigrant Settlement Kristin Good Department of Political Science, Dalhousie University Kristin.Good@Dal .Ca CPSA Annual Conference, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan May 30- June 1, 2007 I. Introduction Immigration policy is a joint federal-provincial responsibility in Canada. Nevertheless, managing immigrant integration is largely an urban question. The bulk of Canada’s immigrants settle in three city-regions – the Greater Toronto Area, the Greater Vancouver Area, and the Montreal Urban Community. The Greater Toronto Area alone receives close to 50 per cent of immigrants to Canada. As constitutional “creatures of provinces,” Canadian municipalities’ legislative responsibilities and fiscal tools are delegated to them by provincial statute. Provincial governments have not mandated a municipal role in immigrant settlement and integration and do not provide municipal governments with additional resources to fulfill these responsibilities. In order to manage social change, some Canadian municipalities have responded by building urban regimes – public-private coalitions whereby local leaders pool resources to create the capacity to develop and implement local policy agendas - with multiculturalism policy purposes (Good 2005). This paper explores the role of the intergovernmental context in urban regime dynamics surrounding immigration policy development in Canada’s largest city and most numerically significant immigrant receiving municipality – the City of Toronto, a city that has been a national leader in multiculturalism policy development despite its highly limited resources and legislative constraints. Using immigration and multiculturalism policy development as an example, it demonstrates how, in Toronto, urban regime building has become both a local capacity-building strategy and a tactic for challenging the subordinate role of municipal governments within federalism.
    [Show full text]