Free Elections: a Non-Negotiable Frconditionee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Free Elections: a Non-Negotiable Frconditionee FREE FREE ELECTIONS: A NON-NEGOTIABLE FRCONDITIONEE FREE ELECTIONS FOR FREE CITIZENS FRfield report n analysis n project informationEE FREE ELECTIONS: A NON-NEGOTIABLE CONDITION field reportn analysis n project information Project: FREE ELECTIONS FOR FREE CITIZENS Published by CIVIL - Center for Freedom Skopje July, 2016 FREE ELECTIONS: A NON-NEGOTIABLE CONDITION Published by: CIVIL - Center for Freedom Publisher: Xhabir M. Deralla Authors, Experts Team: Xhabir M. Deralla (editor), Sašo Ordanoski, PhD (chief political ana- lyst), Biljana Jordanovska, Goran Naumovski (finance expert), Siniša Stanković (CIVIL Media editor), Petrit Saraçini (PR, media), Aleksandra Jozic-Ilekovic (electoral systems expert), Sandra Gavrilovska (legal expert), Dragan Zelić (elections observation expert), Marija Tegovska, Dehran Muratov, Ermin Klimenta, Heather Roberson Gaston (special advisor) Project staff, Contributors: Sonja Eftovska (head of executive committee), Kreshnik Ajdini, Arbana Qerimi, Atanas Petrovski, Katerina Hristovska, Tomislav Kežarovski, Nikola Ugrinovski, Emrah Rexhepi, Behar Memishi, Hadis Sulejman, Biljana Everette, Agnesa Çavolli, Luleta Klica, Vladimir Perčuklievski, Snežana Milisavljević - Ošakovska, and others Observation teams coordinators and members: Monika Taleska, Elena Ilievska, Lenče Hristo- va, Nadica Veličkovska, Mide Nexhipi, Marijana Gugoski, Frosina Mitruševa, Dimče Velev, Dejan Ristov, Slagjana Angelkovska, Zorica Kostovska, Lumi Beqiri, Nenad Micov, Katerina Petanovs- ka, and others Translation services: Natasha Cvetkovska, Dijana Tahiri, Arsim Jonuzi, Gordana Aceska, MA Layout & Design: Xhabir Deralla, Ermin Klimenta, and others Photographs: CIVIL team Illustrations: Miroslav Stojanović Printed by: TP Dule 99, Skopje This publication is financed by the Federal Foreign Office of the Federal Republic of Germany. Findings and standpoints presented in this publica- www.civil.org.mk tion are solely of CIVIL and its authors, and do not necessarily reflect those of the donor. Contacts: www.slobodniizbori.info CIVIL, Maksim Gorky 31/1, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia 02/5209176 | [email protected] | [email protected] Web: www.civil.org.mk | Facebook: www.facebook.com/civil.mk | Twitter: www.twitter.com/ CivilMacedonia | YouTube: www.youtube.com/c/Civil.Macedonia This publication is made available the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. ISBN-10: 608-4815-00-6 ISBN-13: 978-608-4815-00-6 EAN: 9786084815006 CONTENTS | 5 LEAD-IN: Free elections. We accept no less than that! | 9 Observation and investigation field reports | 31 Political pres- sure on unions and their abuse in the electoral context | 35 Hopes and failures: Voters register, Phantom voters, & the State Election Commis- sion | 37 Phantom voters remain in the Voters Register | 43 State Election Commission... besieged by politics | 51 Unfolding Macedonian Crisis: Rigging elections at an industrial scale | 65 Uncompromising struggle for democracy | 72 Macedonia lives in a twisted reality and illusion! | 77 Preventing election manipulations | 89 Everyone has to be equal before the law! | 92 Fear does not go together with democracy | 101 Unscrupulous abuse and politicization | 107 The public has to know | 109 Free elections: So close, yet so far away | 117 The media after the Przino Agreement - a burining issue that nobody wants to resolve | 133 Media darkness and elec- www.freeelections.info www.zgjedhjetelira.info tions | 137 PROJECT ACTIVITY REPORTS | 139 Public events to make people see | 149 Civic education for active and responsible citizens | 155 Focus groups: Widespread corruption | 165 Measuring the public pulse | 170 Interviews that opened the floor to the “invisible” | 176 A contri- bution that matters LEAD-IN Free elections. We accept no less than that! By Xhabir DERALLA on the expres- sion “free elec- Insisting tions”, the mean- ing of it, sets the diagnosis for the Republic of Macedonia already. Free elections is so obvious and normal for so many European societies, and such a troubling issue for this country, for too long. What is accepted as a value and a fact of life in normal societies, is still an unreachable goal for us, here. 5 that is a goal that our organization is striving to reach, in spite of pres- sure, obstructions, and unpredictable developments in the stormy Yet,political reality of the country. Our determination has also only been strengthened as we have found ourselves in a political environment increasingly hostile to civil society actors and to any who dare to challenge the current government’s mo- nopoly on power. But what do free elections require? For free elections to take place, we need a free so- ciety, free citizens. Liberation of the society is a slow and complex process, and cannot be settled by political agreements between a few powerful individuals, irrespective of the number of people they represent. Our standpoint is that we, as civil society, need to provide information, knowledge and safe space for every individual or a group of citizens to become part of the democratic processes. We need citizens free from fear. We need citizens who are free from unprin- cipled ties to shady and deceitful power structures. We need to actively help liberate those citizens who have become so entwined in the nets of political institutions built on a system of clientelism and loyalty tests. That is how the title of this project was cre- ated: Free Elections for Free Citizens. For the past year, CIVIL – Center for Freedom has devoted its energies and focus as a national pro-democracy NGO operating in the Republic of Macedonia to a goal that has proven attainable by so many European societies, but which has persistently remained outside of our country’s grasp: Free elections. During this time, we have been heartened, and energized, as thousands of Macedonian citizens have taken to the streets, also demanding free elections, an idea whose time has come. The Free Elections for Free Citizens project has taken a multi-faceted approach to the preparations for free elections in the Republic of Macedonia. At its heart is the recogni- tion of the need for citizens to see institutions and political parties as part of a joint ef- fort to create conditions to conduct elections in a democratic atmosphere with respect for human rights and freedoms, and provision of conditions that ensure elections that reflect the free will of voters, above all, as our project was conducted against a back- 6 drop of a massive government wiretapping scandal that revealed government spying on opposition. That our project took place against the backdrop of a wiretapping scan- dal that revealed a legacy of election rigging and punishment of opposition parties, perpetrated at the highest levels of government, served to highlight the importance of this goal, and the many obstacles that lay the way of reaching it. The project, which began in June 2015 amid reports of government wire-tapping and election rigging, introduced unique approaches and methodologies that provided civic education on voting rights, and contributed to awareness-raising on electoral irregu- larities. It was conducted through daily dissemination of information and knowledge, based on long-term monitoring of human rights and political situation in an electoral context and in general. Here we stand at an end of a project implementation, but at a beginning of a long-last- ing process, full of variables and challenges. CIVIL has succeeded, through this project, to provide the basis for long-term monitoring and analysis of the political and societal processes related to the elections, voting rights in particular and human rights and free- doms in general. It is and will remain a resource for civic education, awareness-raising and empowerment of citizens to secure free elections. Finally, here it is, a publication that brings a short selection of reports and analysis, re- sulting from one-year-long diligent work of a great many people who took part in the implementation of Free Elections for Free Citizens project. It is alive and will grow, as the work of CIVIL as a human rights organization continues, not only through projects, but as an organized group of activists, human rights defenders and experts, who con- tinue collecting and publicizing cases of human rights violations, and demanding im- provement of policies and practices at all levels and in all spheres of the society. It’s been an exciting year in which we combined a variety of interconnected and com- plementary methodologies and activities, in order to face challenges imposed by the complicated socio-political reality of Macedonia. Through this project, we contributed to changes in perception of various aspects of electoral processes and political cul- ture, public awareness on elections and voting rights, and we formulated demands for changes of policies, legislation and practices to secure free elections. 7 The project consisted of several components, such as field-based research, which in- cluded surveys, focus groups, interviews - all distributed online to CIVIL’s wide and growing audience; fieldwork across the whole country in nearly sixty municipalities; analysis and recommendations; public awareness campaigns; civic education and mo- bilization on electoral and political culture; voting rights education and advocacy; and formation and administration of five regional monitoring teams and а mobile monitor- ing and reporting teams for long-term monitoring. As always, we continued to monitor the situation of human
Recommended publications
  • North Macedonia Political Briefing: Macedonian Politics in 2019 Anastas Vangeli
    ISSN: 2560-1601 Vol. 24, No. 1 (MK) Dec 2019 North Macedonia political briefing: Macedonian politics in 2019 Anastas Vangeli 1052 Budapest Petőfi Sándor utca 11. +36 1 5858 690 Kiadó: Kína-KKE Intézet Nonprofit Kft. [email protected] Szerkesztésért felelős személy: CHen Xin Kiadásért felelős személy: Huang Ping china-cee.eu 2017/01 Macedonian politics in 2019 Introduction After a prolonged period of crises and uncertainty, policymakers, experts and the mass public hoped that in 2019, the Republic of North Macedonia (hereinafter Macedonia) would move towards a political trajectory of reconciliation, reform and integration into the international rules-based order. Having entered a contentious process of changing the country's constitutional name (into North Macedonia) in 2018 in order to solve the decades- long dispute with neighboring Greece, once the renaming was concluded with the formal adoption of the several sets of Constitutional amendments in early 2019, the Macedonian government expected to receive a reward from the international community for its efforts, and designed its political strategy around this assumption. The reward would have arrived in the form of a resolute and smooth advancement of the country's bid to join NATO and the EU (both of which had previously stalled in part due to the objections by Greece), both of which have been widely expected to produce a momentum for simultaneously advancing democratic reforms and unlocking economic progress. Nevertheless, these expectations were hardly met. 2019 turned out to be another year of challenges and difficulties, which in turn prohibited any significant steps towards meaningful political transformation in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 “Skopje 2014” – Between Belated Nation-Building and the Challenges of Globalisation a Dissertation Submitted in Partial
    Skopje 2014 – Between Belated Nation-Building and the Challenges of Globalisation A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of doctor philosophiae to the Department of Political and Social Sciences of Freie Universität Berlin by Zan Ilieski Berlin, 2017 1 Reviewers: Prof. Dr. Manuela Boatca Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg Institute of Sociology Global Studies Programme Prof. Dr. Katharina Bluhm Freie Universität Berlin Department of Political and Social Sciences Institute for East-European Studies Date of defense: 19 July, 2017 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS...............................................................................................................................3 SUMMARY...............................................................................................................................................9 ZUSAMMENFASSUNG............................................................................................................................12 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................16 CHAPTER 2: THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK..............................................................................................27 Research problem..................................................................................................................................27 Democracy – a contested notion...........................................................................................................34
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonia's Post-Yugoslav Reality
    11 Macedonia’s Post-Yugoslav Reality Corruption, Wire-Tapping, and Stolen Elections Sabrina P. Ramet1 How successful or unsuccessful has Macedonia been since its declaration of independence in 1991? The question sounds simple enough. At first glance, one is inclined to say that it has been unusually unsuccessful, even by Balkan standards. The country has been blocked by Greece in its quest to join the European Union (EU) and NATO, was forced – again by Greece – to change its flag and modify its constitution to renounce territorial aspirations it never nurtured, and was admitted to the United Nations only under the humiliating name Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – a designation which suggests to Macedonians that their state is a kind of pariah. Then there is the fact that 30.4 per cent of its people were living below the poverty line in 2011 (see the Introduction to this volume). Again, as noted in the Introduction, Macedonia’s ranking on press freedom in 2015 was the lowest among the seven Yugoslav successor states. And finally, there is the extent of corruption through which the ruling party has maintained itself in power since 2006 (detailed below in the subsection Allegations of Abuse of Power and in the section Political Transformation II below). 1 Except where otherwise noted, all internet sources cited herein were accessed during the period 4–7 November 2014. 1 On the other hand, Macedonia was successful in staying out of the War of Yugoslav Succession (1991–95) as well as the 1999 War for Kosovo, avoided being carved up between Greece and Serbia in 1992,2 and has been relatively successful in boosting revenue from tourism, earning 110 million euros from that sector in 2013.3 In addition, in 2001, an Albanian insurgency was successfully resolved with the signing of the Ohrid Peace Accords (discussed below).
    [Show full text]
  • Captured State Understanding the Macedonian Case
    MANCHO MITEVSKI ОБРЕЖАН ФОРМАТ: 140Х200MM | МАТ ЛАМИНАЦИЈА 1/0 ЛАМИНАЦИЈА 140Х200MM | МАТ ОБРЕЖАН ФОРМАТ: CAPTURED STATE UNDERSTANDING THE MACEDONIAN CASE Mancho Mitevski CAPTURED STATE UNDERSTANDING THE MACEDONIAN CASE Published by: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Skopje Office www.fes-skopje.org Author: Mancho Mitevski Translated by: Tanja Maleska Cover design: Aleksandar Mitevski Designed and printed by: Kontura Print: 200 copies A commercial use of the media published by the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung is not allowed without written approval by the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. The views expressed in this report are those from the author and do not necessarily represent opinions of the Friedrich Ebert Foundation. CIP - Каталогизација во публикација Национална и универзитетска библиотека "Св. Климент Охридски", Скопје 321.64(497.7)"2006/2016" 304.4(497.7)"2006/2016" MITEVSKI, Mancho Captured state : Understanding the Macedonian case / Mancho Mitevski. - Skopje : Friedrich Ebert Stiftung - Office Macedonia, 2018. - 331 стр. ; 25 см Biography: стр. 331 ISBN 978-9989-109-90-4 а) Македонија - Авторитарни политички системи - 2006-2016 б) Македонија - Општествено-политички прилики - 2006-2016 COBISS.MK-ID 109272842 CAPTURED STATE UNDERSTANDING THE MACEDONIAN CASE CONTENTS PREFACE 9 NOTE TO THE PUBLICATION OF “THE CAPTURE STATE” IN ENGLISH 11 FOREWORD 13 I. INTRODUCTION 25 A Return to the Logic of the Cold War 26 Macron’s Victory Put a Stop to the Retrograde Process 29 Putin is Rushing to Make Russia a Factor Again 32 Instead of a Fight against Establishments – a Swap of Establishments 34 Can Trump be the Undertaker of Anti-Globalists Trends? 37 Migrations of the Young People – For a Change of the Geography 42 A Captured State is Only Possible with an Authoritarian Regime and Absolute Power 47 II.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty Sixth Accession Watch Report
    Twenty Sixth Accession Watch Report PRZINO AS EXIT ROUTE March 2016 PRZINO AS EXIT ROUTE Twenty Sixth Accession Watch Report Publisher: Foundation Open Society - Macedonia For the publisher: Fani Karanfilova-Panovska, Executive Director Prepared by: Macedonian Center for European Training and Foundation Open Society - Macedonia Proofreading and Translation into English: Abacus Design & Layout: Brigada design, Skopje Print: Propoint Circulation: 500 Free/Noncommercial circulation CIP - Каталогизација во публикација Национална и универзитетска библиотека “Св. Климент Охридски”, Скопје 341.171.071.51(4-672ЕУ:497.7)”2016” 329:347.440.14(497.7)”2015” ПРЖИНО како излез: дваесет и шести извештај од следењето на процесот на пристапување на Македонија во ЕУ. - Скопје : Фондација Отворено општество - Македонија, 2016. - 110, 112 стр. : табели ; 18x24 см Насл. стр. на припечатениот текст: Przino as exit roud: twenty sixth accession watch report. - Обата текста меѓусебно печатени во спротивни насоки. - Текст на мак. и англ. јазик. - Фусноти кон текстот ISBN 978-608-218-234-6 а) Пржински договор - Македонија - 2015 б) Македонија - Зачленување - Европска Унија - 2016 COBISS.MK-ID 101468682 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. WHERE ARE WE IN MARCH 2016? 5 II. CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS 15 1. NEW PRESIDENCY TRIO: THE NETHERLANDS, 1. ESSENCE OF PRZINO 15 SLOVAKIA AND MALTA 7 1. Establishment of caretaker government 16 1. Union of Jobs, Growth and Competitiveness 7 2. Special Prosecution Office 18 2. Union That Empowers and Protects All Its Citizens 7 Which states have special prosecution offices and why? 18 3. Towards an Energy Union with a Forward-Looking Why Macedonia needs special prosecution office? 19 Climate Policy 8 Negotiations and appointment of the special prosecutor 21 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Developments on the “Name Issue” 1.1
    BAROMETER Current Events and Political Parties Development in the Republic of Macedonia Issue Nr. 31 December 2014 Dr. Natasha Gaber-Damjanovska In cooperation with the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung office Macedonia 1 C O N T E N T S 1. DEVELOPMENTS ON THE “NAME ISSUE” 1.1. Nimetz Visits in Macedonia and Greece by end-July 1. 2. Germany Included in Finding a Resolution for the Name Issue 1.3. November Meeting and its Echo 1.4. Nimetz’s Agreement Proposal Revealed 2. EU and NATO INTEGRATION PROCESSES 2.1. Council of Europe Delegation Visits Macedonia 2.2. Berlin Conference of Western Balkan States 2.3. Balkan States Expect No Breakthroughs at NATO Summit 2.4. EU Commission Estimates: There is Uneven Progress in Balkans 2.5. Newland Issuing a Message to Leaders of the Region 2.6. European Commission Progress Report 2014 Issued 2.7. Dutch Ambassador: Macedonia Tolerates Violence to “Shut People up” 3. ECONOMY 3.1. Unchained Borrowing Continues 3.2. Fall Budget Rebalance 3.3. Macedonia at Bottom of Regional Wage Table 3.4. Macedonian Economics Analysis, Critiques, Issues 3.5. Not so Many Foreign Investments as Promised and Expected 3.6. Any Hope for the Young in Macedonia? 3.7. Macedonia World Bank Country Manager Interview 3.8. Is the Russian Deal a Risk to Macedonia's EU Funds? 4.HEADLINES/POLICIES 4.1. Protests for the Lifelong Imprisonment Sentences for the Smilkovsko Lake Murders 4.2. Ruling Coalition Constitutional Change Initiative 4.3. State Department Report on Religious Tolerance in Balkans 4.4. Marginalized Albanian Politicians Declare 'Republic' in Macedonia 4.5.
    [Show full text]
  • The Balkans in Europe's Future
    International Commission on the Balkans The Balkans in Europe’s Future International Commission on the Balkans The Balkans in Europe’s Future ROBERT BOSCH STIFTUNG l KING BAUDOUIN FOUNDATION GERMAN MARSHALL FUND OF THE UNITED STATES l CHARLES STEWART MOTT FOUNDATION Secretariat CENTRE FOR LIBERAL STRATEGIES, Sofia 2 Commission Members l Report of the International Commission on the Balkans Giuliano Amato, Chairman Member of Senate, former Prime Minister, Italy Carl Bildt former Prime Minister, Sweden Avis Bohlen former Assistant Secretary of State, United States Jean-Luc Dehaene Member of European Parliament, former Prime Minister, Belgium Kemal Dervis Member of Parliament, former Minister of Finance, Turkey Mircea Geoana Member of Senate, former Minister of Foreign Affairs, Romania Kiro Gligorov former President, Macedonia Istvan Gyarmati Chairman, Center for Euro-Atlantic Integration and Democracy, Hungary François Heisbourg Director, Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique, France Bruce Jackson President, The Project on Transitional Democracies, United States Zlatko Lagumdzija President, Social Democratic Party; former Prime Minister, Bosnia and Herzegovina Ilir Meta Chairman, Socialist Movement for Integration, former Prime Minister, Albania Neven Mimica Member of Parliament, former Minister for European Integration, Croatia Dame Pauline Neville-Jones former Governor of BBC, United Kingdom Janez Potocnik Member of the European Commission, former Minister for European Integration, Slovenia Alexandros Rondos former Ambassador at Large,
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Corruption and Tailor-Made Laws in Republic of North Macedonia
    GRAND CORRUPTION Transparency International Macedonia Tel./Fax: 02 3 21 70 00 AND TAILOR-MADE LAWS IN [email protected] www.transparency.mk www.facebook.com/TransparencyMK https://twitter.com/TI_Macedonia REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA GRAND CORRUPTION AND TAILOR-MADE LAWS IN REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA PROJECT: Ending impunity for grand corruption in the Western Balkans and Turkey * This project is financially supported by the European Union. This report has been prepared by Transparency International – Macedonia in cooperation with Transparency International Secretariat in Berlin. This publication was produced with the financial support of the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of Transparency International – Macedonia and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union. For Transparency International Macedonia, Slagjana Taseva, PhD, President Metodi Zajkov, Secretary General * Transparency International - Macedonia is responsible for the content of this document and under no circumstances should it be considered as a position of the European Union. This document has been prepared as part of the project “Ending impunity for grand corruption in the Western Balkans and Turkey”, financially supported by the European Union. Author: Slagjana Taseva Ph.D Collaborators: Adrijana Rushiti and Soraja Jusufoska Print: Datapons, Skopje Copies: 100 Cover photo: Stamat Naumovski Maximum effort has been made for verification and accuracy of the data contained in this report. It is believed that all information as of
    [Show full text]