Selective Increase of Dopamine D3 Receptor Gene Expression As A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Selective Increase of Dopamine D3 Receptor Gene Expression As A Molecular Psychiatry (2000) 5, 378–388 2000 Macmillan Publishers Ltd All rights reserved 1359-4184/00 $15.00 www.nature.com/mp ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE Selective increase of dopamine D3 receptor gene expression as a common effect of chronic antidepressant treatments C-H Lammers1,2*, J Diaz1*, J-C Schwartz3 and P Sokoloff3 1Laboratoire de Physiologie, Universite´ Rene´ Descartes, 4 Avenue de l’Observatoire, 75006 Paris, France; 3Unite´ de Neurobiologie et Pharmacologie Mole´culaire (U. 109) de l’Institut National de la Sante´ et Recherche Me´dicale, Centre Paul Broca, 2ter rue d’Ale´sia, 75014 Paris, France The mesolimbic dopaminergic system is a neuroanatomical key structure for reward and motivation upon which previous studies indicated that antidepressant drugs exert a stimu- latory influence, via still unknown neurobiological mechanisms. Here we examined the effects of chronic administration of antidepressants of several classes (amitriptyline, desipramine, imipramine, fluoxetine and tranylcypromine) and repeated electroconvulsive shock treatments (ECT) on dopamine D3 receptor expression in the shell of the nucleus accumbens, a major projection area of the mesolimbic dopaminergic system. Short-term drug treatments had vari- able effects on D3 receptor mRNA expression. In contrast, treatments for 21 days (with all drugs except fluoxetine) significantly increased D3 receptor mRNA expression in the shell of nucleus accumbens; D3 receptor binding was also significantly increased by amitriptyline or fluoxetine after a 42-day treatment. ECT for 10 days increased D3 receptor mRNA and binding in the shell of nucleus accumbens. D1 receptor and D2 receptor mRNAs were increased by imipramine and amitriptyline, but not by the other treatments. The time-course of altered D3 receptor expression, in line with the delayed clinical efficiency of antidepressant treatment, and the fact that various antidepressant drugs and ECT treatments eventually produced the same effects, suggest that increased expression of the D3 receptor in the shell of nucleus accumbens is a common neurobiological mechanism of antidepressant treatments, resulting in enhanced responsiveness to the mesolimbic dopaminergic system. Molecular Psychiatry (2000) 5, 378–388. Keywords: depression; antidepressant drug; electroconvulsive shock; mesolimbic dopaminergic system Introduction to an idiopathic manic episode7,8 and the discontinu- ation of such drugs9 or the acute administration of Considerable emphasis has been placed upon the puta- dopamine receptor antagonists can result in a psycho- tive role of nucleus accumbens dopamine systems in pathological state similar to a depressive episode.10 appetitive motivation and positive reinforcement.1,2 Clinical studies in depressed patients using [123I]IBZM- Hence, mesolimbic dopaminergic neurons projecting to SPECT have found increased D receptor binding in the the nucleus accumbens have been suggested to be 2 striatum probably reflecting reduced dopamine func- involved in the neurobiology of depression and the tion in depression.11,12 Furthermore, dopaminergic therapeutic actions of some antidepressant drugs.3–6 drugs such as the dopamine-uptake inhibitors This hypothesis postulates that decreased dopamine amineptine, nomifensin and buproprion have been activity is involved in depression, while increased successfully used for treating major depression.13–15 dopamine function contributes to mania. Accordingly, Chronic treatment with antidepressant drugs pro- dopaminergic drugs (eg amphetamine or cocaine) can duces in rats a variety of changes in dopaminergic produce effects in humans that are remarkably similar neurotransmission, most notably a sensitization of behavioral responses to agonists acting at dopamine D /D receptors within the nucleus accumbens,6,16 an Correspondence: P Sokoloff, Unite´ de Neurobiologie et Pharmaco- 2 3 logie Mole´culaire (U.109) de l’Institut National de la Sante´et increased electrophysiological activity of mesolimbic 17,18 Recherche Me´dicale, Centre Paul Broca, 2ter rue d’Ale´sia, 75014 dopaminergic neurons, an increase in D2/D3 recep- Paris, France tor binding sites19 and an increase in interstitial dopa- See also the Image page, Molecular Psychiatry 2000; 5: 229 mine concentrations in the nucleus accumbens.20,21 *These two authors have contributed equally to this paper 2Present address: Zentrum fur Nervenheilkunde, Klinik fur Neur- Similar results have been obtained after chronic ¨ ¨ 22–24 ologie, Rudolf-Bultmann Str 8, 35039 Marburg, Germany ECT. Received 3 January 2000; revised and accepted 17 March 2000 The D3 receptor is expressed mainly in the limbic Increase of dopamine D3 receptor expression C-H Lammers et al 379 ventral part of the striatal complex, particularly in the wet weight using 14Cor3H standard stripes shell of the nucleus accumbens,25,26 thought to be (Amersham). involved in reward, emotional, and cognitive pro- cesses.27 A recent study indicates that antidepressant Statistical analysis ± drugs administered repeatedly enhance D3 receptor Values reported are means SEM. Differences between binding.28 groups of animals treated with saline or antidepressant In this study we have examined the changes in cer- drugs were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by ebral expression of dopamine receptors, as well as a Dunnett’s multiple comparison post-hoc test when P Ͻ those in dynorphin and substance P, two neuropep- 0.05. Analysis of variations of D3 receptor mRNA tides whose expression is regulated by dopamine, in with treatment duration was performed by two-way rats receiving various kinds of antidepressant treat- ANOVA followed by a Least Significant Difference test. ment, including monoamine uptake inhibitors, a Effects of electroconvulsive shocks were analysed by monoamineoxidase inhibitor and ECT. Since responses the Mann–Whitney U test. to antidepressant drugs emerge in humans after several weeks of treatment, we have compared the effects of Results these drugs produced by either acute or repeated administrations. A daily regimen of antidepressant drugs of various chemical classes with different pharmacological pro- files (see Table 1) was administered for 21 days, and Materials and methods dopamine D1,D2 and D3 receptor mRNA levels meas- ured by quantitative in situ hybridization studies 24 h Drug treatments after the last injection. Hybridization signals were ana- Male Wistar rats (IFFA Credo, l’Arbresles, France (180– lyzed in several brain regions as specified in Figure 1e. 200 g)) were housed in groups of five in a temperature- As exemplified with amitriptyline (Figure 1a, b), D controlled room on a 12 h : 12 h light : dark schedule, 3 receptor mRNA level increased prominently in the light starting at 7.00 am, with free access to food and shell part of nucleus accumbens (particularly in the water. They received daily intraperitoneal injections ventral part) and ventromedial part of the striatum, (between 4.00 and 6.00 pm) of either desimipramine − − whereas lesser effects were produced in the core of (15 mg kg 1) or imipramine (15 mg kg 1), amitriptyline − − nucleus accumbens. Analysis of in situ hybridization (15 mg kg 1), fluoxetine (15 mg kg 1) or tranylcyprom- − signals at high magnification (Figure 1c, d) indicated ine (7.5 mg kg 1) for 1, 5, 10, 21 or 42 days. Rats were an increased D receptor mRNA per cell and not an killed by decapitation 24 h after the last injection and 3 increased number of D receptor mRNA-expressing the brain rapidly removed and frozen by dipping in 3 cells. isopentane maintained at −30°C. After 21-day treatments, other mixed norepinephrine/ serotonin uptake inhibitors, ie desip- Electroconvulsive shocks ramine and imipramine, as well as the monoaminoxid- Electroconvulsive treatment (85 V, 50 Hz, 0.05 s) was ase inhibitor tranylcypromine all increased, like ami- administered using ear clip electrodes in non anes- triptyline, D3 receptor mRNA by 35–54% in the shell thetised rats once a day for 10 days. Each treatment of nucleus accumbens, but fluoxetine produced an caused a typical tonic clonic convulsion for 20–35 s. opposite effect (Table 1). In addition, some compounds Sham treatment consisted in application of electrodes also increased D3 receptor mRNA in some other without current. Rats were killed 24 h after the last regions, ie desipramine in the fronto-parietal cortex, treatment and their brain rapidly dissected and frozen. septum and olfactory tubercle and islands of Calleja. No changes were observed in the dorso-lateral In situ hybridization and receptor autoradiography striatum. Coronal tissue sections (10 ␮m in striatal region and On the contrary, when imipramine, amitriptyline 20 ␮m in mesencephalic region) were cut on a cryostat and tranylcypromine were administered only once, and thaw-mounted on RNAse-free slides. Sections they elicited a decrease in the D3 receptor mRNA level were used either unfixed (in receptor autoradiography in the shell of nucleus accumbens; imipramine also experiments) or fixed (in in situ hybridization decreased D3 receptor mRNA in the islands of Calleja experiments) in 4% paraformaldehyde. In situ (Table 2). Analysis of the changes produced during hybridization experiments were performed with spe- prolonged treatment by amitriptyline (Figure 2) indi- 33 cific [ P] cRNA probes for D1,D2 and D3 receptor, cated that after an initial reduction, D3 receptor mRNA dynorphin or substance P mRNAs as described.25,29 in the shell of nucleus accumbens was rapidly nor- D3 receptor binding autoradiography was performed malized within
Recommended publications
  • Still the Leading Antidepressant After 40
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY "2001), 178, 129^144 REVIEW ARTICLE Amitriptyline vv.therest:stilltheleading METHOD Inclusion criteria antidepressant after 40 years of randomised All RCTs comparing amitriptyline with any y other tricyclic,heterocyclic or SSRI were in- controlled trials cluded. Crossover studies were excluded. Studies adopting any criteria to define CORRADO BARBUI and MATTHEW HOTOPF patients suffering from depression were included; a concurrent diagnosis of another psychiatric disorder was not considered an exclusion criterion. Trials in patients with depression with a concomitant medical ill- Background Tricyclic antidepressants Amitriptyline is one of the first `reference' ness were not included in this review. have similar efficacy and slightly lower tricyclic antidepressants TCAs). Over the past 40 years a number of newer tricyclics, tolerability than selective serotonin Search strategy heterocyclics and selective serotonin re- Relevant studies were located by searching reuptakeinhibitorsreuptake inhibitors SSRIs).However, uptake inhibitors SSRIs) have been intro- the Cochrane Collaboration Depression, there are no systematic reviews assessing duced Garattini et aletal,1998). Despite Anxiety and Neurosis Controlled Trials several large systematic reviews comparing amitriptyline, the reference tricyclic drug, Register CCDANCTR). This specialised tricyclics and SSRIs there is no clear agree- vv. other tricyclics and SSRIs directly. register is regularly updated by electronic ment over first-line treatment of depression Medline,Embase,PsycINFO,LILACS, SongSong et aletal,1993; Anderson & Tomenson, Aims ToreviewTo review the tolerability and Psyndex,CINAHL,SIGLE) and non-electro- 1995; Montgomery & Kasper,1995; efficacy of amitriptyline inthe nicnicliterature searches. The register was HotopfHotopf et aletal,1996; Canadian Coordinating management of depression. searched using the following terms: Office for Health Technology Assessment, AMITRIPTYLIN**AMITRIPTYLIN oror AMITRILAMITRIL oror ELA-ELA- 19971997aa).
    [Show full text]
  • (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub
    US 20130289061A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0289061 A1 Bhide et al. (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 31, 2013 (54) METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS TO Publication Classi?cation PREVENT ADDICTION (51) Int. Cl. (71) Applicant: The General Hospital Corporation, A61K 31/485 (2006-01) Boston’ MA (Us) A61K 31/4458 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. (72) Inventors: Pradeep G. Bhide; Peabody, MA (US); CPC """"" " A61K31/485 (201301); ‘4161223011? Jmm‘“ Zhu’ Ansm’ MA. (Us); USPC ......... .. 514/282; 514/317; 514/654; 514/618; Thomas J. Spencer; Carhsle; MA (US); 514/279 Joseph Biederman; Brookline; MA (Us) (57) ABSTRACT Disclosed herein is a method of reducing or preventing the development of aversion to a CNS stimulant in a subject (21) App1_ NO_; 13/924,815 comprising; administering a therapeutic amount of the neu rological stimulant and administering an antagonist of the kappa opioid receptor; to thereby reduce or prevent the devel - . opment of aversion to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Also (22) Flled' Jun‘ 24’ 2013 disclosed is a method of reducing or preventing the develop ment of addiction to a CNS stimulant in a subj ect; comprising; _ _ administering the CNS stimulant and administering a mu Related U‘s‘ Apphcatlon Data opioid receptor antagonist to thereby reduce or prevent the (63) Continuation of application NO 13/389,959, ?led on development of addiction to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Apt 27’ 2012’ ?led as application NO_ PCT/US2010/ Also disclosed are pharmaceutical compositions comprising 045486 on Aug' 13 2010' a central nervous system stimulant and an opioid receptor ’ antagonist.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Validation of a LC-MS/MS Method for Detection and Quantification of 18 Antidepressants in Whole Blood
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Student Theses John Jay College of Criminal Justice Spring 6-2019 Development and validation of a LC-MS/MS method for detection and quantification of 18 antidepressants in whole blood Linda Kim CUNY John Jay College, [email protected] How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/jj_etds/106 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Development and validation of a LC-MS/MS method for detection and quantification of 18 antidepressants in whole blood A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Forensic Science, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York Linda Kim May 2019 Development and validation of a LC-MS/MS method for detection and quantification of 18 antidepressants in whole blood Linda Kim This Thesis has been presented to and accepted by the Office of Graduate Studies, John Jay College of Criminal Justice in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Forensic Science. Thesis Committee Thesis Advisor: Marta Concheiro-Guisan Second Reader: Shu-Yuan Cheng External Reader: Damon Borg i Acknowledgement I would like to thank Dr. Stripp for providing his laboratory for my research, and Dr. Borg and everyone in Cordant Laboratory for their guidance and support. I would like to thank Dr. Concheiro-Guisan for her time, patience, and information, and for making it possible to successfully complete this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,893,053 B2 Seed Et Al
    US0078.93053B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,893,053 B2 Seed et al. (45) Date of Patent: Feb. 22, 2011 (54) TREATING PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS WO WO 2006/127418 11, 2006 USING MUSCARINIC RECEPTORM ANTAGONSTS (75) Inventors: Brian Seed, Boston, MA (US); Jordan OTHER PUBLICATIONS Mechanic, Sunnyvale, CA (US) Chau et al. (Nucleus accumbens muscarinic receptors in the control of behavioral depression : Antidepressant-like effects of local M1 (73) Assignee: Theracos, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA (US) antagonist in the porSolt Swim test Neuroscience vol. 104, No. 3, pp. 791-798, 2001).* (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this Lind et al. (Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonists inhibit patent is extended or adjusted under 35 chick Scleral chondrocytes Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual U.S.C. 154(b) by 726 days. Science, vol.39, 2217-2231.* Chau D., et al., “Nucleus Accumbens Muscarinic Receptors in the (21) Appl. No.: 11/763,145 Control of Behavioral Depression: Antidepressant-like Effects of Local M1 Antagonists in the Porsolt Swin Test.” Neuroscience, vol. (22) Filed: Jun. 14, 2007 104, No. 3, Jun. 14, 2001, pp. 791-798. Bechtel, W.D., et al., “Biochemical pharmacology of pirenzepine. (65) Prior Publication Data Similarities with tricyclic antidepressants in antimuscarinic effects only.” Arzneimittelforschung, vol. 36(5), pp. 793-796 (May 1986). US 2007/O293480 A1 Dec. 20, 2007 Chau, D.T. et al., “Nucleus accumbens muscarinic receptors in the control of behavioral depression: antidepressant-like effects of local Related U.S. Application Data Mantagonist in the Porsolt Swim test.” Neuroscience, vol. 104(3), (60) Provisional application No.
    [Show full text]
  • Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors in Parkinson's Disease
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Parkinson’s Disease Volume 2015, Article ID 609428, 71 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/609428 Review Article Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors in Parkinson’s Disease Philippe Huot,1,2,3 Susan H. Fox,1,2 and Jonathan M. Brotchie1 1 Toronto Western Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8 2Division of Neurology, Movement Disorder Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399BathurstStreet,Toronto,ON,CanadaM5T2S8 3Department of Pharmacology and Division of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, UniversitedeMontr´ eal´ and Centre Hospitalier de l’UniversitedeMontr´ eal,´ Montreal,´ QC, Canada Correspondence should be addressed to Jonathan M. Brotchie; [email protected] Received 19 September 2014; Accepted 26 December 2014 Academic Editor: Maral M. Mouradian Copyright © 2015 Philippe Huot et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The motor manifestations of Parkinson’s disease (PD) are secondary to a dopamine deficiency in the striatum. However, the degenerative process in PD is not limited to the dopaminergic system and also affects serotonergic and noradrenergic neurons. Because they can increase monoamine levels throughout the brain, monoamine reuptake inhibitors (MAUIs) represent potential therapeutic agents in PD. However, they are seldom used in clinical practice other than as antidepressants and wake-promoting agents. This review article summarises all of the available literature on use of 50 MAUIs in PD. The compounds are divided according to their relative potency for each of the monoamine transporters.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceuticals Appendix
    )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 3 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. Product CAS No. Product CAS No. ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ADAPALENE 106685-40-9 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ADAPROLOL 101479-70-3 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ADEMETIONINE 17176-17-9 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ADENOSINE PHOSPHATE 61-19-8 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ADIBENDAN 100510-33-6 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ADICILLIN 525-94-0 ACAMPROSATE 77337-76-9 ADIMOLOL 78459-19-5 ACAPRAZINE 55485-20-6 ADINAZOLAM 37115-32-5 ACARBOSE 56180-94-0 ADIPHENINE 64-95-9 ACEBROCHOL 514-50-1 ADIPIODONE 606-17-7 ACEBURIC ACID 26976-72-7 ADITEREN 56066-19-4 ACEBUTOLOL 37517-30-9 ADITOPRIME 56066-63-8 ACECAINIDE 32795-44-1 ADOSOPINE 88124-26-9 ACECARBROMAL 77-66-7 ADOZELESIN 110314-48-2 ACECLIDINE 827-61-2 ADRAFINIL 63547-13-7 ACECLOFENAC 89796-99-6 ADRENALONE 99-45-6 ACEDAPSONE 77-46-3 AFALANINE 2901-75-9 ACEDIASULFONE SODIUM 127-60-6 AFLOQUALONE 56287-74-2 ACEDOBEN 556-08-1 AFUROLOL 65776-67-2 ACEFLURANOL 80595-73-9 AGANODINE 86696-87-9 ACEFURTIAMINE 10072-48-7 AKLOMIDE 3011-89-0 ACEFYLLINE CLOFIBROL 70788-27-1
    [Show full text]
  • Still the Leading Antidepressant After 40 Years of Randomised Controlle
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY "2001), 178, 129^144 REVIEW ARTICLE Amitriptyline vv.therest:stilltheleading METHOD Inclusion criteria antidepressant after 40 years of randomised All RCTs comparing amitriptyline with any y other tricyclic,heterocyclic or SSRI were in- controlled trials cluded. Crossover studies were excluded. Studies adopting any criteria to define CORRADO BARBUI and MATTHEW HOTOPF patients suffering from depression were included; a concurrent diagnosis of another psychiatric disorder was not considered an exclusion criterion. Trials in patients with depression with a concomitant medical ill- Background Tricyclic antidepressants Amitriptyline is one of the first `reference' ness were not included in this review. have similar efficacy and slightly lower tricyclic antidepressants TCAs). Over the past 40 years a number of newer tricyclics, tolerability than selective serotonin Search strategy heterocyclics and selective serotonin re- Relevant studies were located by searching reuptakeinhibitorsreuptake inhibitors SSRIs).However, uptake inhibitors SSRIs) have been intro- the Cochrane Collaboration Depression, there are no systematic reviews assessing duced Garattini et aletal,1998). Despite Anxiety and Neurosis Controlled Trials several large systematic reviews comparing amitriptyline, the reference tricyclic drug, Register CCDANCTR). This specialised tricyclics and SSRIs there is no clear agree- vv. other tricyclics and SSRIs directly. register is regularly updated by electronic ment over first-line treatment of depression Medline,Embase,PsycINFO,LILACS, SongSong et aletal,1993; Anderson & Tomenson, Aims ToreviewTo review the tolerability and Psyndex,CINAHL,SIGLE) and non-electro- 1995; Montgomery & Kasper,1995; efficacy of amitriptyline inthe nicnicliterature searches. The register was HotopfHotopf et aletal,1996; Canadian Coordinating management of depression. searched using the following terms: Office for Health Technology Assessment, AMITRIPTYLIN**AMITRIPTYLIN oror AMITRILAMITRIL oror ELA-ELA- 19971997aa).
    [Show full text]
  • Tcas Versus Placebo - New Studies in the Guideline Update
    TCAs versus placebo - new studies in the guideline update Comparisons Included in this Clinical Question Amitriptyline vs placebo Clomipramine vs placebo Dosulepin (dothiepin) vs placebo AMSTERDAM2003A LARSEN1989 FERGUSON1994B BAKISH1992B PECKNOLD1976B ITIL1993 BAKISH1992C RAMPELLO1991 MINDHAM1991 BREMNER1995 THOMPSON2001B CLAGHORN1983 CLAGHORN1983B FEIGHNER1979 GELENBERG1990 GEORGOTAS1982A GOLDBERG1980 HICKS1988 HOLLYMAN1988 HORMAZABAL1985 HOSCHL1989 KLIESER1988 LAAKMAN1995 LAPIERRE1991 LYDIARD1997 MYNORSWALLIS1995 MYNORSWALLIS1997 REIMHERR1990 RICKELS1982D RICKELS1985 RICKELS1991 ROFFMAN1982 ROWAN1982 SMITH1990 SPRING1992 STASSEN1993 WILCOX1994 16 Imipramine vs placebo BARGESCHAAPVELD2002 BEASLEY1991B BOYER1996A BYERLEY1988 CASSANO1986 CASSANO1996 CLAGHORN1996A COHN1984 COHN1985 COHN1990A COHN1992 COHN1996 DOMINGUEZ1981 DOMINGUEZ1985 DUNBAR1991 ELKIN1989 ENTSUAH1994 ESCOBAR1980 FABRE1980 FABRE1992 FABRE1996 FEIGER1996A FEIGHNER1980 FEIGHNER1982 FEIGHNER1983A FEIGHNER1983B FEIGHNER1989 FEIGHNER1989A FEIGHNER1989B FEIGHNER1989C FEIGHNER1992B FEIGHNER1993 FONTAINE1994 GELENBERG2002 GERNER1980B HAYES1983 ITIL1983A KASPER1995B KELLAMS1979 LAIRD1993 LAPIERRE1987 LECRUBIER1997B LIPMAN1986 LYDIARD1989 MARCH1990 17 MARKOWITZ1985 MENDELS1986 MERIDETH1983 Nortriptyline vs placebo NANDI1976 GEORGOTAS1986A NORTON1984 KATZ1990 PEDERSEN2002 NAIR1995 PESELOW1989 WHITE1984A PESELOW1989B PHILIPP1999 QUITKIN1989 RICKELS1981 RICKELS1982A RICKELS1987 SCHWEIZER1994 SCHWEIZER1998 SHRIVASTAVA1992 SILVERSTONE1994 SMALL1981 UCHA1990 VERSIANI1989 VERSIANI1990
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors in Parkinson's Disease
    Review Article Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors in Parkinson’s Disease Philippe Huot,1,2,3 Susan H. Fox,1,2 and Jonathan M. Brotchie1 1 Toronto Western Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 2S8 2Division of Neurology, Movement Disorder Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 399BathurstStreet,Toronto,ON,CanadaM5T2S8 3Department of Pharmacology and Division of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, UniversitedeMontr´ eal´ and Centre Hospitalier de l’UniversitedeMontr´ eal,´ Montreal,´ QC, Canada Correspondence should be addressed to Jonathan M. Brotchie; [email protected] Received 19 September 2014; Accepted 26 December 2014 Academic Editor: Maral M. Mouradian Copyright © 2015 Philippe Huot et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The motor manifestations of Parkinson’s disease (PD) are secondary to a dopamine deficiency in the striatum. However, the degenerative process in PD is not limited to the dopaminergic system and also affects serotonergic and noradrenergic neurons. Because they can increase monoamine levels throughout the brain, monoamine reuptake inhibitors (MAUIs) represent potential therapeutic agents in PD. However, they are seldom used in clinical practice other than as antidepressants and wake-promoting agents. This review
    [Show full text]
  • Resume of Scientific Contributions to Psychopharmacology And
    RESUME OF SCIENTIFIC CONTRIBUTIONS TO PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY AND BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY While Fridolin Sulser was a visiting scientist from Switzerland in the Laboratory of Chemical Pharmacology at the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland, he and B.B. Brodie utilized the reserpine-like syndrome as a "model depression" and in due course discovered the secondary amine desmethyl-imipramine (DM1) formed in vivo by oxidative N-demethylation of imipramine (1,2).DMI turned out to be the first selective inhibitor of the high affinity uptake of norepinephrine and triggered the development of many secondary amines of tricyclic antidepressants as therapeutic agents (e.g. desipramine, nortriptyline, protriptyline maprotiline, oxaprotiline, and more recently reboxetine). These drugs provided more selective pharmacologic tools to dissect the role of central noradrenergic mechanisms (3). During the early 1970s, Fridolin Sulser and his associates discovered that treatment with antidepressants on a clinically relevant time basis (including tricyclics, 4- Fridolin Sulser, M.D. Curriculum Vitae MAO inhibitors, some atypical antidepressants and electroconvulsive treatment) reduces selectively the responsiveness of the norepinephrine (NE) beta adrenoceptor coupled adenylate cyclase system in limbic and cortical structures of the rat brain (4,5). This deamplification of the central beta adrenoceptor system is often linked to a down- regulation of the Brnax value of beta adrenoceptors, without changes in the KD. These findings shifted the research emphasis on the mode of action of antidepressant treatments and on the pathophysiology of affective disorders from acute presynaptic to delayed post-synaptic receptor - second messenger mediated events and emphasized the role of adaptive processes at the level of signal transduction and opened the gateway for subsequent studies on changes of programs of gene expression.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyclic Antidepressant Drugs SI Conversion: [AUQ: Dr
    834 II: THERAPEUTIC DRUGS 127. Spiker DG, Pugh DD. Combining tricyclic and monoamine oxidase inhibi- 145. Chambost M, Liron L, Peillon D, et al. [Serotonin syndrome during fluoxetine tor antidepressants. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1976;33(7):828–830. poisoning in a patient taking moclobemide.] Can J Anaesth 2000;47(3):246– 128. Peebles-Brown AE. Hyperpyrexia following psychotropic drug overdose. 250. Anaesthesia 1985;40(11):1097–1099. 146. Myrenfors PG, Eriksson T, Sandsted CS, et al. Moclobemide overdose. J 129. Tuck JR, Punell G. Uptake of (3H)5-hydroxytryptamine and (3H)noradrenaline Intern Med 1993;233(2):113–115. by slices of rat brain incubated in plasma from patients treated with chlorimi- 147. Pounder DJ, Jones GR. Post-mortem drug redistribution––a toxicological pramine, imipramine or amitriptyline. J Pharm Pharmacol 1973;25(7):573–574. nightmare. Forensic Sci Int 1990;45(3):253–263. 130. Gillman PK. Successful treatment of serotonin syndrome with chlorproma- 148. Lichtenwalner MR, Tully RG, Cohn RD, et al. Two fatalities involving zine. Med J Aust 1996;165(6):345–346. phenelzine. J Anal Toxicol 1995;19(4):265–266. 131. Graham PM. Successful treatment of the toxic serotonin syndrome with 149. Yonemitsu K, Pounder DJ. Postmortem changes in blood tranylcypromine chlorpromazine. Med J Aust 1997;166(3):166–167. concentration: competing redistribution and degradation effects. Forensic 132. Tackley RM, Tregaskis B. Fatal disseminated intravascular coagulation fol- Sci Int 1993;59(2):177–184. lowing a monoamine oxidase inhibitor/tricyclic interaction. Anaesthesia 150. Baselt RC, Shaskan E, Gross EM. Tranylcypromine concentrations and 1987;42(7):760–763.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DIX to the HTSUS—Continued
    20558 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 80 / Wednesday, April 26, 1995 / Notices DEPARMENT OF THE TREASURY Services, U.S. Customs Service, 1301 TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL APPEN- Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DIX TO THE HTSUSÐContinued Customs Service D.C. 20229 at (202) 927±1060. CAS No. Pharmaceutical [T.D. 95±33] Dated: April 14, 1995. 52±78±8 ..................... NORETHANDROLONE. A. W. Tennant, 52±86±8 ..................... HALOPERIDOL. Pharmaceutical Tables 1 and 3 of the Director, Office of Laboratories and Scientific 52±88±0 ..................... ATROPINE METHONITRATE. HTSUS 52±90±4 ..................... CYSTEINE. Services. 53±03±2 ..................... PREDNISONE. 53±06±5 ..................... CORTISONE. AGENCY: Customs Service, Department TABLE 1.ÐPHARMACEUTICAL 53±10±1 ..................... HYDROXYDIONE SODIUM SUCCI- of the Treasury. NATE. APPENDIX TO THE HTSUS 53±16±7 ..................... ESTRONE. ACTION: Listing of the products found in 53±18±9 ..................... BIETASERPINE. Table 1 and Table 3 of the CAS No. Pharmaceutical 53±19±0 ..................... MITOTANE. 53±31±6 ..................... MEDIBAZINE. Pharmaceutical Appendix to the N/A ............................. ACTAGARDIN. 53±33±8 ..................... PARAMETHASONE. Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the N/A ............................. ARDACIN. 53±34±9 ..................... FLUPREDNISOLONE. N/A ............................. BICIROMAB. 53±39±4 ..................... OXANDROLONE. United States of America in Chemical N/A ............................. CELUCLORAL. 53±43±0
    [Show full text]