DOCSLIB.ORG

Laguna Cartagena National Wildlife Refuge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Laguna Cartagena National Wildlife Refuge U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Comprehensive ConservationPlan Laguna CartagenaNationalWildlifeRefuge Laguna Cartagena National Wildlife Refuge Susan Silander, Project Leader Caribbean Islands NWR Complex P.O. Box 510 Boqueron, PR 00622 LagunaLaguna CartagenaCartagena Phone: 787/851 7258 Fax: 787/255 6725 NationalNational WildlifeWildlife RefugeRefuge E-mail: [email protected] ComprehensiveComprehensive ConservationConservation PlanPlan U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 1 800/344 WILD http://www.fws.gov July 2011 Photo provided by Jim Abernethy’s Scuba Adventures Front Cover Photo Credits: Background/open water - David Bocanegra/USFWS Yellow crown night heron - Bryant Marcial/USFWS Whistling duck - Bryant Marcial/USFWS Orange bishop bird - Bryant Marcial/USFWS Photo blind structure - David Bocanegra/USFWS Observation tower - David Bocanegra/USFWS Common moorhen - Bryant Marcial/USFWS White-cheeked Pintail - Bryant Marcial/USFWS Whistling duck - Bryant Marcial/USFWS Refuge sign - David Bocanegra/USFWS Comprehensive Conservation Plans provide long-term guidance for management decisions; set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes; and identify the Fish and Wildlife Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans do not constitute a commitment for staffing increases, operational and maintenance increases, or funding for future land acquisition. Laguna Cartagena National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region September 2011 Laguna Cartagena National Wildlife Refuge COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION PLAN LAGUNA CARTAGENA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Lajas, Puerto Rico U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia September 2011 Laguna Cartagena National Wildlife Refuge TABLE OF CONTENTS COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION PLAN Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 I. Background ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose And Need For The Plan ................................................................................................. 1 Fish and Wildlife Service .............................................................................................................. 1 National Wildlife Refuge System .................................................................................................. 2 Legal and Policy Context .............................................................................................................. 4 National and International Conservation Plans and Initiatives ..................................................... 5 Relationship To State Wildlife Agency ..........................................................................................6 II. Refuge Overview .............................................................................................................................. 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 7 Refuge History and Purpose ........................................................................................................ 7 Background Information ............................................................................................................... 7 Special Designations .................................................................................................................... 8 Ecosystem Context .....................................................................................................................11 Regional Conservation Plans and Initiatives ..............................................................................12 Ecological Threats and Problems ............................................................................................... 12 Physical Resources .................................................................................................................... 13 Climate .............................................................................................................................. 13 Geology and Topography ..................................................................................................14 Soils .................................................................................................................................. 17 Hydrology and Water Quality ............................................................................................18 Biological Resources .................................................................................................................. 20 Habitat ............................................................................................................................... 20 Cultural Resources ..................................................................................................................... 24 Socioeconomic Environment ...................................................................................................... 24 Wildlife ............................................................................................................................... 26 Refuge Administration and Management ...................................................................................27 Land Protection and Conservation ....................................................................................27 Visitor Services ................................................................................................................. 27 Personnel, Operations, and Maintenance .........................................................................28 III. Plan Development ......................................................................................................................... 29 Summary of Issues, Concerns, and Opportunities .....................................................................29 Public Involvement and the Planning Process ..................................................................29 Summary of Meetings and Contacts .................................................................................29 IV. Management Direction ................................................................................................................ 33 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 33 Vision ................................................................................................................................ 33 Goals, Objectives, and Strategies .....................................................................................33 Fish and Wildlife Population Management ........................................................................34 Habitat Management .........................................................................................................39 Table of Contents i Resource Protection ......................................................................................................... 43 Visitor Services ................................................................................................................. 45 Refuge Administration ...................................................................................................... 48 V. Plan Implementation .................................................................................................................... 53 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 53 Proposed Projects ...................................................................................................................... 53 Funding and Personnel .............................................................................................................. 57 Monitoring and Adaptive Management ....................................................................................... 58 Plan Review and Revision.......................................................................................................... 58 Partnership/Volunteers Opportunities ........................................................................................ 60 Step-Down Management Plans .................................................................................................. 60 Appendix A. Glossary ...................................................................................................................... 61 Appendix B. References and Literature Citations ......................................................................... 71 Appendix C. Relevant Legal Mandates and Executive Orders ..................................................... 77 Appendix D. Public Involvement ..................................................................................................... 91 Summary Of Public Scoping
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Synopsis of Phaseoleae (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae) James Andrew Lackey Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1977 A synopsis of Phaseoleae (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae) James Andrew Lackey Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Lackey, James Andrew, "A synopsis of Phaseoleae (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae) " (1977). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 5832. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/5832 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of the Nutritional Quality of Mixed and Exclusive Fruit Diets for Yellow-Vented Bulbuls
    The Condor 94:912-923 0 The Cooper Ornithological Society 1992 A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE NUTRITIONAL QUALITY OF MIXED AND EXCLUSIVE FRUIT DIETS FOR YELLOW-VENTED BULBULS IDO IZHAKI Department of Biology, Universityof Halfa at Oranim, Tivon, 36910, Israel Abstract.Yellow-vented Bulbuls (Pycnonotusxanthopygos) were fed a mixed diet of four fruit species(Rhamnus alaternus,Lonicera etrusca,Rubia tenuifolia, Ephedra aphylla) and diets containing each of these four fruits separately. A mixed-fruit diet proved no more nutritious than a single-fruit diet, and all the birds lost weight at the same rate regardless of diet. Birds fed a mixed-fruit diet assimilated less protein than those fed exclusively on Rubia and Rhamnus fruits, and assimilated more energy than those fed exclusively on Ephedrafruits. The apparent metabolizable energy(AME) in bulbuls fed a mixed diet (0.73) was higher than in those fed on Rubia and Ephedra (0.69 and 0.61, respectively)but lower than in those fed on Rhamnus (0.82). Protein content alone does not explain loss of body mass. However, lack of specificamino acids, or high potassiumto sodium ratios, may cause mass loss. In addition, a mixed diet of four fruit speciesmay not prevent the accumulation of secondarycompounds to a damaginglevel resulting in low protein assimilation. Key words: frugivory;fruit preference:nutrition; Yellow-ventedBulbul; Pycnonotusxan- thopygos;digestion; metabolizability. and Safiiel 1985, 199 1, unpubl. data), mixed date INTRODUCTION palm-citrus orchards in Iraq (Al-Dabbagh et al. The relationship between plants which produce 1987), gardens and palm groves in western Ara- fleshy fruits and their dispersers is based partially bia (Meinertzhagen 1954) and the Ethiopian on the nutritional value of the fruit for the dis- lowland forest and non-forest habitats (Moreau perser.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacognostical and Physico–Chemical Standardization of Leaves of Caesalpinia Pulcherrima
    IJRPC 2011, 1(4) Pawar et al. ISSN: 22312781 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PHARMACY AND CHEMISTRY Available online at www.ijrpc.com Research Article PHARMACOGNOSTICAL AND PHYSICO–CHEMICAL STANDARDIZATION OF LEAVES OF CAESALPINIA PULCHERRIMA C. R. Pawar1*, R. B. Kadtan1, A. A. Gaikwad1 and D. B. Kadtan2 1S.N.D. College of Pharmacy, Babhulgaon, Yeola, Nasik (Dt.), Maharashtra, India. 2R.C. Patel institute of pharmacy, Shirpur, Dhule, Maharashtra, India. *Corresponding Author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Caesalpinia pulcherrima belonging to family Caesalpiniaceae is distributed throught out India. Commonly it is known as Peacock-flower. Plant shows diterpenoids, isovouacaperol, sitosterol and flavonoids. The plant is considered as emmenagogue, purgative and stimulant, abotificient and also used in bronchitis, asthma and malarial fever, leaves used as antipyretic, antimicrobial. Flower also shows antioxidant and antiviral activity. The present study deals with the macroscopical and microscopical studies of Caesalpinia pulcherrima leaf. Macroscopically, the Caesalpinia pulcherrima is compound leaf, ovate shape, entire margin and glabrous surface, asymmetrical base, small petiole. The microscopic study showed presence of collenchyma, vascular bundle, spongy parenchyma, palisade cells, stomata. Some distinct characters were observed while studying the transverse sections. Physiochemical studies revealed total ash, acid insoluble ash, water insoluble ash, loss on drying, alcohol soluble extractive, water soluble extractive and preliminary phytochemical studies of the leaves were also carried out. The present study might be useful to supplement information in regard to its identification parameters. Keywords: Caesalpinia pulcherrima, physico-chemical analysis, phytochemical study. INTRODUCTION diterpenoids, isovouacaperol, sitosterol also Caesalpinia pulcherrima is also known as present. Caesalpinia pulcherrima is used for a peacock flower1 is the type of genus fabaceae various purpose of herbal medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • Euphorbia Subg
    ФЕДЕРАЛЬНОЕ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЕ БЮДЖЕТНОЕ УЧРЕЖДЕНИЕ НАУКИ БОТАНИЧЕСКИЙ ИНСТИТУТ ИМ. В.Л. КОМАРОВА РОССИЙСКОЙ АКАДЕМИИ НАУК На правах рукописи Гельтман Дмитрий Викторович ПОДРОД ESULA РОДА EUPHORBIA (EUPHORBIACEAE): СИСТЕМА, ФИЛОГЕНИЯ, ГЕОГРАФИЧЕСКИЙ АНАЛИЗ 03.02.01 — ботаника ДИССЕРТАЦИЯ на соискание ученой степени доктора биологических наук САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГ 2015 2 Оглавление Введение ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Глава 1. Род Euphorbia и основные проблемы его систематики ......................................... 9 1.1. Общая характеристика и систематическое положение .......................................... 9 1.2. Краткая история таксономического изучения и формирования системы рода ... 10 1.3. Основные проблемы систематики рода Euphorbia и его подрода Esula на рубеже XX–XXI вв. и пути их решения ..................................................................................... 15 Глава 2. Материал и методы исследования ........................................................................... 17 Глава 3. Построение системы подрода Esula рода Euphorbia на основе молекулярно- филогенетического подхода ...................................................................................................... 24 3.1. Краткая история молекулярно-филогенетического изучения рода Euphorbia и его подрода Esula ......................................................................................................... 24 3.2. Результаты молекулярно-филогенетического
    [Show full text]
  • La Familia Basellaceae
    Gayana Bot. 75(2): 639-642, 2018. ISSN 0016-5301 Comunicación Breve Nueva familia de angiospermas para el registro de la flora nativa de Chile: la familia Basellaceae New angiosperm family for the checklist of the native Chilean flora: the family Basellaceae ANDRÉS MOREIRA-MUÑOZ1* & MÉLICA MUÑOZ-SCHICK2 1Instituto de Geografía, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Av. Brasil 2241, Valparaíso, Chile. 2Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Casilla 787, Santiago, Chile. *[email protected] ABSTRACT The presence of Anredera diffusa, from the Basellaceae family, is reported for the first time for the Chilean flora. This species was found in the locality of Mancaruma, north of Socoroma town, in the Arica y Parinacota Region. This is the first record of a native species of Basellaceae in Chile. El conocimiento de la flora de Chile ha sido construido poblado de Socoroma, en la cual se encontró la especie de paulatinamente a partir de los tratamientos florísticos y Anredera que se reporta en este trabajo (Fig. 1). estadísticos de C. Gay, Rodulfo y Federico Philippi, C. Reiche, Durante el trabajo de campo para completar el Catálogo C. Muñoz Pizarro y C. Marticorena (Marticorena 1990). La de Asteraceae de la Región de Arica y Parinacota, se estadística de Reiche (2013) incluía 141 familias, mientras encontró una especie de hojas rojas y suculentas. Se trata de Marticorena consideró 175 familias de plantas vasculares la especie Anredera diffusa (Moq.) Sperling. Esta especie (Marticorena 1990). Debido a los cambios sistemáticos se encuentra comúnmente en Perú, pero no había sido más recientes, especialmente a partir de datos moleculares, registrada en Chile.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin of Plant Originated from Some Had Possibly Changed Recognise Original Wild Species. Suggested a Relationship with Pr
    The possible origin of Cucumis anguria L. by A.D.J. Meeuse (National Herbarium, Pretoria) (Issued Oct. 2nd, 1958) Cucumis India Gherkin” “Bur anguria L., the “West or Gherkin”, is a cultigen known to have occurred in the West Indies in a cultivated or more or less adventitious state since before 1650 when the first accounts of this plant were published (1, 2). The occurrence of a single species of this old world genus — which is mainly African but extends through South West Asia to India — in America, combined with the fact that it is almost exclusively found in cultivation or as an escape, makes one feel suspicious about its being truly indigenous in the New World. Naudin (4) discussed the history of this plant and suggested that it introduced from West Africa whence slaves were was originally negro brought to the New World. However, he admittedly did not know any wild African species of Cucumis which resembles C. anguria sufficiently to deserve consideration as its probable ancestor. J. D. Hooker (5) also discussed the origin of the West Indian plant and was inclined to agree that it originated from some wild African ancestral form which had possibly changed so much through cultivation that it would be somewhat difficult to recognise the original wild species. He suggested a relationship with Cucumis prophetarum and “C. figarei” but he cautiously stated that these two species are perennial, whereas C. anguria is a typical annual. A. de Candolle (6) pointed out that although C. anguria was generally assumed to be a native of the Antilles, more particularly of Jamaica, two facts plead against this idea.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 7 National Family Farm Discovery Dox
    Case: 19-70115, 08/13/2019, ID: 11396549, DktEntry: 36-7, Page 1 of 233 No. 19-70115 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NATIONAL FAMILY FARM COALITION, et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., Respondents, and MONSANTO COMPANY, Intervenor-Respondent. ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PETITIONERS’ EXCERPTS OF RECORD VOLUME VII of IX ______________________ CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL George A. Kimbrell DIVERSITY Sylvia Shih-Yau Wu Stephanie M. Parent Amy van Saun PO Box 11374 2009 NE Alberta St., Suite 207 Portland, OR 97211 Portland, OR 97211 T: (971) 717-6404 T: (971) 271-7372 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Petitioners Case: 19-70115, 08/13/2019, ID: 11396549, DktEntry: 36-7, Page 2 of 233 INDEX TO PETITIONERS’ EXCERPTS OF RECORD VOLUME I Admin. R. ER Date 1 Document Description Doc. No. Page No. 2 11/1/2018 M.8 Registration Decision for the ER 0001 Continuation of Uses of Dicamba on Dicamba Tolerant Cotton and Soybean 11/1/2018 M.9 Approval Master Label for EPA ER 0025 Registration No. 524-617, Primary Brand Name: M1768 Herbicide Alternate Brand Name: XtendiMax® With VaporGrip® Technology 11/5/2018 M.4 Notice of Conditional Registration ER 0065 and Approved Master Label for EPA Registration No. 524-617, Primary Brand Name: M1768 Herbicide Alternate Brand Name: XtendiMax® With VaporGrip® Technology 11/5/2018 M.3 Notice of Conditional Registration ER 00121 EPA Reg Number 352-913 DuPont FeXapan Herbicide Decision 545658 and Approved Label 11/1/2018 M.5 Notice of Conditional Registration ER 0167 EPA Registration Number 7969- 345 Engenia Herbicide Decision No.
    [Show full text]
  • Reporton the Rare Plants of Puerto Rico
    REPORTON THE RARE PLANTS OF PUERTO RICO tii:>. CENTER FOR PLANT CONSERVATION ~ Missouri Botanical Garden St. Louis, Missouri July 15, l' 992 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Center for Plant Conservation would like to acknowledge the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the W. Alton Jones Foundation for their generous support of the Center's work in the priority region of Puerto Rico. We would also like to thank all the participants in the task force meetings, without whose information this report would not be possible. Cover: Zanthoxy7um thomasianum is known from several sites in Puerto Rico and the U.S . Virgin Islands. It is a small shrub (2-3 meters) that grows on the banks of cliffs. Threats to this taxon include development, seed consumption by insects, and road erosion. The seeds are difficult to germinate, but Fairchild Tropical Garden in Miami has plants growing as part of the Center for Plant Conservation's .National Collection of Endangered Plants. (Drawing taken from USFWS 1987 Draft Recovery Plan.) REPORT ON THE RARE PLANTS OF PUERTO RICO TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements A. Summary 8. All Puerto Rico\Virgin Islands Species of Conservation Concern Explanation of Attached Lists C. Puerto Rico\Virgin Islands [A] and [8] species D. Blank Taxon Questionnaire E. Data Sources for Puerto Rico\Virgin Islands [A] and [B] species F. Pue~to Rico\Virgin Islands Task Force Invitees G. Reviewers of Puerto Rico\Virgin Islands [A] and [8] Species REPORT ON THE RARE PLANTS OF PUERTO RICO SUMMARY The Center for Plant Conservation (Center) has held two meetings of the Puerto Rlco\Virgin Islands Task Force in Puerto Rico.
    [Show full text]
  • Caesalpinia Pulcherrima (Dwarf Poinciana) Size/Shape
    Caesalpinia pulcherrima (Dwarf Poinciana) The dwarf Poinciana is a fast growing large shrub or small tree Leaves are bright green bi-pinnate feathery. Flowers are very showy yellow and orange in the middle appearing throughout the year. The fruits are pod. Makes a good specimen and used as barrier. All plant parts are poisonous. Grows well in drained sandy soil and needs full sun. Landscape Information French Name: Césalpinie la plus belle, Petit Flamboyant Pronounciation: sez-al-PIN-ee-uh pul-KAIR- ih-muh Plant Type: Shrub Origin: South America Heat Zones: 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 Hardiness Zones: 9, 10, 11, 12 Uses: Specimen, Border Plant, Container, Windbreak, Reclamation Size/Shape Growth Rate: Fast Tree Shape: Round Plant Image Canopy Symmetry: Irregular Canopy Density: Medium Canopy Texture: Fine Height at Maturity: 3 to 5 m Spread at Maturity: 1.5 to 3 meters Time to Ultimate Height: 5 to 10 Years Caesalpinia pulcherrima (Dwarf Poinciana) Botanical Description Foliage Leaf Arrangement: Opposite Leaf Venation: Pinnate Leaf Persistance: Evergreen Leaf Type: Bipinnately compound Leaf Blade: Less than 5 Leaf Shape: Oblong Leaf Margins: Entire Leaf Textures: Rough Leaf Scent: No Fragance Color(growing season): Green Color(changing season): Green Flower Image Flower Flower Showiness: True Flower Size Range: 3 - 7 Flower Type: Raceme Flower Sexuality: Monoecious (Bisexual) Flower Scent: No Fragance Flower Color: Yellow Seasons: Year Round Trunk Trunk Susceptibility to Breakage: Suspected to breakage Number of Trunks: Multi-Trunked,
    [Show full text]
  • Monocotyledons and Gymnosperms of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands
    SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Contributions from the United States National Herbarium Volume 52: 1-415 Monocotyledons and Gymnosperms of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands Editors Pedro Acevedo-Rodríguez and Mark T. Strong Department of Botany National Museum of Natural History Washington, DC 2005 ABSTRACT Acevedo-Rodríguez, Pedro and Mark T. Strong. Monocots and Gymnosperms of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Contributions from the United States National Herbarium, volume 52: 415 pages (including 65 figures). The present treatment constitutes an updated revision for the monocotyledon and gymnosperm flora (excluding Orchidaceae and Poaceae) for the biogeographical region of Puerto Rico (including all islets and islands) and the Virgin Islands. With this contribution, we fill the last major gap in the flora of this region, since the dicotyledons have been previously revised. This volume recognizes 33 families, 118 genera, and 349 species of Monocots (excluding the Orchidaceae and Poaceae) and three families, three genera, and six species of gymnosperms. The Poaceae with an estimated 89 genera and 265 species, will be published in a separate volume at a later date. When Ackerman’s (1995) treatment of orchids (65 genera and 145 species) and the Poaceae are added to our account of monocots, the new total rises to 35 families, 272 genera and 759 species. The differences in number from Britton’s and Wilson’s (1926) treatment is attributed to changes in families, generic and species concepts, recent introductions, naturalization of introduced species and cultivars, exclusion of cultivated plants, misdeterminations, and discoveries of new taxa or new distributional records during the last seven decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioactive Compounds and Chemical Composition Of
    a OSSN 0101-2061 (Print) Food Science and Technology OSSN 1678-457X (Dnline) DDO: https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.19417 Bioactive compounds and chemical composition of Brazilian Cerrado fruits’ wastes: pequi almonds, murici, and sweet passionfruit seeds Ana Cristina Moreira Andrade ARAÚJD1, Evandro Galvão Tavares MENEZES1, André William Costa TERRA1, Bruna Dliveira DOAS1, Érica Resende de DLOVEORA1*, Fabiana QUEORDZ1 Abstract Pequi, murici and sweet passionfruit are typical fruits from Brazilian Cerrado, which stand out for their sensory attributes such as color, flavor and aroma, in addition to their high nutritional value. Their seeds are by-products from the industrial processing of juices, pulps, jellies, and others, and have great exploitation potential due to their high oil content and the presence of bioactive compounds. The present work aimed to evaluate the chemical composition of pequi almonds, and of murici and sweet passionfruit seeds, and also to quantify the total phenolic compounds, carotenoids, anthocyanins and antioxidant activity by the scavenging activity of •DPPH method. Concerning the chemical composition, pequi almonds presented the highest concentration of lipids (50%), followed by sweet passionfruit (30%) and murici seeds (15%). The almonds from pequi fruit showed the greatest content of protein (33.3%) followed by sweet passionfruit seeds (15%), which presented the highest amount of fiber (41.3%). Murici seeds exhibited the highest content of carbohydrates (46.4%). Pequi almonds had the greatest content of the following minerals, potassium, magnesium, sulfur, manganese, zinc, copper, iron, and sodium, and anthocyanins (14.4 mg CYG/100 g d.b.). Sweet passionfruit seeds presented the greatest amount of calcium, and also had the highest carotenoid content (9 mg/100 g d.b.).
    [Show full text]
  • Puerto Rico Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy 2005
    Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy Puerto Rico PUERTO RICO COMPREHENSIVE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION STRATEGY 2005 Miguel A. García José A. Cruz-Burgos Eduardo Ventosa-Febles Ricardo López-Ortiz ii Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy Puerto Rico ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Financial support for the completion of this initiative was provided to the Puerto Rico Department of Natural and Environmental Resources (DNER) by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Federal Assistance Office. Special thanks to Mr. Michael L. Piccirilli, Ms. Nicole Jiménez-Cooper, Ms. Emily Jo Williams, and Ms. Christine Willis from the USFWS, Region 4, for their support through the preparation of this document. Thanks to the colleagues that participated in the Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy (CWCS) Steering Committee: Mr. Ramón F. Martínez, Mr. José Berríos, Mrs. Aida Rosario, Mr. José Chabert, and Dr. Craig Lilyestrom for their collaboration in different aspects of this strategy. Other colleagues from DNER also contributed significantly to complete this document within the limited time schedule: Ms. María Camacho, Mr. Ramón L. Rivera, Ms. Griselle Rodríguez Ferrer, Mr. Alberto Puente, Mr. José Sustache, Ms. María M. Santiago, Mrs. María de Lourdes Olmeda, Mr. Gustavo Olivieri, Mrs. Vanessa Gautier, Ms. Hana Y. López-Torres, Mrs. Carmen Cardona, and Mr. Iván Llerandi-Román. Also, special thanks to Mr. Juan Luis Martínez from the University of Puerto Rico, for designing the cover of this document. A number of collaborators participated in earlier revisions of this CWCS: Mr. Fernando Nuñez-García, Mr. José Berríos, Dr. Craig Lilyestrom, Mr. Miguel Figuerola and Mr. Leopoldo Miranda. A special recognition goes to the authors and collaborators of the supporting documents, particularly, Regulation No.
    [Show full text]