PEDAL POWER: a Legal Guide for Oregon Bicyclists

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PEDAL POWER: a Legal Guide for Oregon Bicyclists PEDAL POWER: A Legal Guide for Oregon Bicyclists by Ray omas EIGHTH EDITION A PROJECT OF THE BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION ALLIANCE Obey all signs & traffic lights Bicycles must be driven like other vehicles if they are to be taken seriously by motorists. Never ride against traffic. Use hand signals Hand signals tell motorists what you intend to do. For turn signals, point in the direction of your turn. Signal as a matter of courtesy and safety and as required by law. Ride consistently Ride as close as practical to the right. Exceptions: when travelling at the normal speed of traffic, avoiding hazardous conditions, preparing to make a left turn, or using a one-way street. Choose the best way to turn left There are two ways to make a left turn: 1) Like an auto: look back, signal, move into the left lane, and turn left. 2) Like a pedestrian: ride straight to the far-side crosswalk, then walk your bike across, or queue up in the traffic lane. Use caution when passing Motorists may not see you on their right, so be extra careful where there’s no bike lane if you pass on the right side of cars. Watch for parked cars pulling out, unsignalled right turns and opening car doors. Make eye contact with drivers. Avoid road hazards Watch for sewer grates, slippery manhole covers, oily pavement, gravel and ice. Cross railroad tracks at right angles. For better control as you move across bumps and other hazards, stand up on your pedals. Ride a well-equipped bike Outfit your bike with a good bike lock, tool kit, fenders, and bike bags. You are required to use a strong white head-light (visible from 500’) and rear red reflector or light (visible from 600’) at night and when visibility is poor. Dress appropriately Wear a Snell or ANSI approved hard-shell helmet whenever you ride (required by law for cyclists under 16 years of age). Wear light-colored clothes at night. Make yourself as visible as possible. Get a green light If you come to a red light and see this symbol on the street, position your bike directly over it. Wait, and soon the light will turn green! If a car is already there, it will activate the light for you. Go slow on sidewalks Pedestrians have the right of way on walkways. You must give an audible warning when you pass. Enter driveways and inter- sections at a walker’s pace and look carefully for traffic. Cyclists are not allowed to ride on sidewalks in downtown Portland. Copyright © 2012 Ray Thomas PEDAL POWER: A Legal guide for Oregon Bicyclists Eighth Edition – 2012 Preface . iii A Word From The Bicycle Transportation Alliance ...................................... v PART I: Bicycle Laws . vii LAWS Oregon Revised Statutes (O.R.S.) ..................................................1 153.018 Maximum Fines. ......................................................2 153.019 Presumptive fines; generally. ............................................3 153.021 Minimum fines........................................................3 153.061 Appearance by defendant. ..............................................3 184.740 Safe Routes to Schools Fund . 3 184.741 Safe routes to schools program; rules. .....................................4 366.112 Bicycle lane and path advisory committee; members, terms, duties and powers; meetings. ...........................................4 366.514 Use of highway fund for footpaths and bicycle trails. 5 801.030 Exemptions from amendments to vehicle code. ..............................6 801.150 “Bicycle.” ...........................................................6 801.155 “Bicycle lane.” .......................................................6 801.160 “Bicycle path.” .......................................................7 801.220 “Crosswalk.”.........................................................7 801.258 “Electric assisted bicycle.” ..............................................7 801.305 “Highway.” . 7 801.320 “Intersection.” .......................................................8 801.345 “Moped.” ...........................................................8 801.348 “A motor assisted scooter.” . .8 801.360 “Motor vehicle.” ......................................................9 801.385 “Pedestrian.” ........................................................9 801.400 “Premises open to the public.” ...........................................9 801.440 “Right of way.” .......................................................9 801.450 “Roadway.”..........................................................9 801.480 “Shoulder.”..........................................................9 801.485 “Sidewalk.”..........................................................9 801.608 “Vulnerable user of a public way.”.........................................9 802.325 Bicycle safety program; contents; fees. ...................................10 810.090 Bicycle racing. ......................................................10 810.150 Drain construction; compliance with bicycle safety requirements; guidelines. ......10 811.020 Passing vehicle stopped at crosswalk; penalty. .11 811.025 Failure to yield to pedestrian on sidewalk; penalty............................11 811.028 Failure to stop and remain stopped for pedestrian; penalty.....................11 811.050 Failure to yield to rider on bicycle lane; penalty. .............................12 811.055 Failure to yield to bicyclist on sidewalk. ...................................12 811.060 Vehicular assault of bicyclist or pedestrian; penalty. .........................12 811.065 Unsafe passing of a person operating a bicycle..............................13 811.135 Careless driving; penalty. 13 811.355 Improperly executed right turn; penalty. ...................................14 811.410 Unsafe passing on left; penalty. .........................................14 811.415 Unsafe passing on right; penalty. ........................................15 811.420 Passing in no passing zone; exceptions; penalty. ............................16 811.425 Failure of slower driver to yield to overtaking vehicle; penalty. ..................16 811.435 Operation of motor vehicle on bicycle trail; exemptions; penalty. ................17 811.440 When motor vehicles may operate on bicycle lane............................17 811.490 Improper opening or leaving open of vehicle door; penalty. ....................17 811.505 Failure to stop when emerging from alley, driveway or building; penalty............18 814.400 Application of vehicle laws to bicycles.....................................18 814.405 Status of electric assisted bicycle. .......................................18 814.410 Unsafe operation of bicycle on sidewalk; penalty.............................18 814.420 Failure to use bicycle lane or path; exceptions; penalty........................19 814.430 Improper use of lanes; exceptions; penalty. ................................20 814.440 Failure to signal turn; exceptions; penalty. .................................20 814.450 Unlawful load on bicycle; penalty. .......................................21 814.460 Unlawful passengers on bicycle; penalty. ..................................21 814.470 Failure to use bicycle seat; penalty. ......................................21 814.480 Nonmotorized vehicle clinging to another vehicle; penalty......................21 814.484 Meaning of “bicycle” and “operating or riding on a highway.” ...................22 814.485 Failure to wear protective headgear; penalty. ...............................22 814.486 Endangering bicycle operator or passenger; penalty. .........................22 814.487 Exemptions from protective headgear requirements. .22 814.488 Citations; exemption from requirement to pay fine. ..........................23 814.489 Use of evidence of lack of protective headgear on bicyclist.....................23 814.500 Rights and duties of person riding motorized wheelchair on bicycle lane or path.....23 814.514 Failure of operator of motor assisted scooter to use bicycle lane or path; exception; penalty....................................................23 815.280 Violation of bicycle equipment requirements; penalty. ........................24 815.281 Selling noncomplying bicycle headgear; renting or leasing bicycle without having approved headgear available; penalties..............................24 Oregon Rules Relating to Bicycle Facilities ..........................................27 ARTICLES “Vulnerable Roadway User”, a Useful Legal Concept for Bicycle and Pedestrian Injuries ........49 Oregon’s “Safe Passing” Law.....................................................55 We Have a Right to the Freeway, But Which Freeway? ..................................61 Bike Lanes Revisited ...........................................................63 How to Send All the Right Signals – Turn and Stop Signals ..............................67 Oregon Bicycle Lighting Requirements .............................................71 Oregon Statute Makes Dangerous Storm Drains Illegal .................................75 Avoiding Typical Accidents and Collisions ...........................................79 Car-Doored Again? The Law Is on Your Side!.........................................85 Fatal Right Hook: Hazard from Right Turning Motorists .................................89 Additional Bicycle Articles on the Web .............................................95 PART II: Bicycle Riding on Sidewalks and Crosswalks ........................101 LAWS City Ordinances Regarding Riding on the Sidewalk . .103 Miscellaneous Laws Regulating Bicycle Riding and Parking.............................113
Recommended publications
  • Tol, Xeer, and Somalinimo: Recognizing Somali And
    Tol , Xeer , and Somalinimo : Recognizing Somali and Mushunguli Refugees as Agents in the Integration Process A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Vinodh Kutty IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY David M. Lipset July 2010 © Vinodh Kutty 2010 Acknowledgements A doctoral dissertation is never completed without the help of many individuals. And to all of them, I owe a deep debt of gratitude. Funding for this project was provided by two block grants from the Department of Anthropology at the University of Minnesota and by two Children and Families Fellowship grants from the Annie E. Casey Foundation. These grants allowed me to travel to the United Kingdom and Kenya to conduct research and observe the trajectory of the refugee resettlement process from refugee camp to processing for immigration and then to resettlement to host country. The members of my dissertation committee, David Lipset, my advisor, Timothy Dunnigan, Frank Miller, and Bruce Downing all provided invaluable support and assistance. Indeed, I sometimes felt that my advisor, David Lipset, would not have been able to write this dissertation without my assistance! Timothy Dunnigan challenged me to honor the Somali community I worked with and for that I am grateful because that made the dissertation so much better. Frank Miller asked very thoughtful questions and always encouraged me and Bruce Downing provided me with detailed feedback to ensure that my writing was clear, succinct and organized. I also have others to thank. To my colleagues at the Office of Multicultural Services at Hennepin County, I want to say “Thank You Very Much!” They all provided me with the inspiration to look at the refugee resettlement process more critically and dared me to suggest ways to improve it.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulating In-House Counsel: a Catholicon Or a Nostrum Daniel A
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Marquette University Law School Marquette Law Review Volume 77 | Issue 2 Article 4 Regulating In-House Counsel: A Catholicon or a Nostrum Daniel A. Vigil Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr Part of the Law Commons Repository Citation Daniel A. Vigil, Regulating In-House Counsel: A Catholicon or a Nostrum, 77 Marq. L. Rev. 307 (2009). Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol77/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marquette Law Review by an authorized administrator of Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REGULATING IN-HOUSE COUNSEL: A CATHOLICON OR A NOSTRUM? DANIEL A. VIGIL* I. INTRODUCTION What is and what is not the unauthorized practice of law has long been difficult, if not impossible, to define.' Unauthorized practice of law committees and courts have frequently grappled with the issue. Specifi- cally, are corporate in-house counsel participating in the unauthorized practice of law when they are assigned to work in a jurisdiction where they are not licensed? This issue has never been fully resolved. The American Bar Association has sidestepped the issue, although it has had a number of opportunities to address it. The ABA Code of Pro- fessional Responsibility and the ABA Model Rules of Professional Con- duct provide little guidance. They simply state that "[a] lawyer shall not practice law in a jurisdiction where doing so violates the regulation of the legal profession in that juisdiction."2 In the absence of guidance from the ABA, states confronting the question have reached very differ- ent conclusions.
    [Show full text]
  • Client Choice, Contractual Restraints, and the Market for Legal Services*
    CLIENT CHOICE, CONTRACTUAL RESTRAINTS, AND THE MARKET FOR LEGAL SERVICES* Robert W. Hillman** I. INTRODUCTION The freedom of clients to discharge their lawyers at any time, with or without cause, greatly facilitates competition among lawyers. 1 An era of lawyer mobility that has destabilized law firms and rewarded lawyers able to command the loyalty of their clients rests on the simple and largely unquestioned premise that clients should be free to discharge their lawyers, with or without cause and even, under most circumstances, in contravention of contract. 2 This Article explores the norm of client choice and its impact on the market for legal services. It discusses the historical foundations of the norm, the policy reasons for and against the freedom accorded to clients to change their lawyers at any time, and ways in which the exercise of client choice is limited by application of other principles of law and ethics. For a comparative perspective, it also looks to standards of medical ethics to see the relative roles of consumer choice over service providers in the two professions. II. LEGAL SERVICES AND CLIENT CHOICE A. The Foundations of Client Choice At the core of client choice is the premise that an individual has a right to legal counsel and that “choice” necessarily suggests alternatives from which to choose. From a constitutional perspective, however, an express right to legal representation is limited, with some exceptions, to criminal proceedings 3 and is implemented through a standard of * Copyright 2007 by Robert W. Hillman ** Fair Business Practices Distinguished Professor of Law, University of California, Davis.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Happens
    April 2019 –– Volume 11, Issue 4 RECOVERY HAPPENS Illuminating pathways toward opportunity, possibility, wellness and independence. Restoration Society, Inc., 66 Englewood Avenue, Buffalo, NY 14214 www.rsiwny.org (716) 832-2141 Fax (716) 832-0021 My Corner of the World. by Tim Malley In my corner of the world I have very few things to make me happy. I have my books, my CDs, and my DVD’s to make me happy, but other than that I really don't have much in my corner of the world. But what I do have is precious to me because even though I live at an institution such as Leroy Manor I have my little corner to call my own its my own so to speak because it’s my corner of the world. When You Read This, by Mary Adkins Restoration Society, Inc. is on AmazonSmile! Here is how you can help us! 1. Sign into smile.amazon.com with your Amazon login info. 2. Under "Your Account" select "Change Your Charity" 3. In the "Find Your Charity" search bar, type Restoration Society, Inc. and click "Search" When publicist Iris Massey is diagnosed 4.Click "Select" next to "Restoration Society, Inc." with terminal lung cancer at only 31 years old, she begins chronicling her life and final days online. 5. Shop until your heart is content! When her longtime business partner Smith and his new intern Carl discover Iris' blog months after her death, they set out to fulfill her last wish of turning her writings into a book. Mary Adkins' When You Read This is told in an epistolary style through emails, blog posts, travel bookings, texts, and more digital snippets (fans of Where'd You Go, Bernadette will love this) and is a bittersweet, often funny novel about hope, memory, and loose ends.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moody Blues at Ironstone Amphitheatre | Murphys, California | 6/18/2017 (Concert Review + Photos)
    7/5/2017 The Moody Blues at Ironstone Amphitheatre | Murphys, California | 6/18/2017 (Concert Review + Photos) The Moody Blues at Ironstone Amphitheatre | Murphys, California | 6/18/2017 (Concert Review + Photos) JUNE 20, 2017 BY JASON DEBORD Fans of The Moody Blues got to experience the band like never before on Sunday night at Ironstone Amphitheatre.c Featuring “an evening with…” style concert presentation, The Moody Blues played two full sets in front of the massive crowd in attendance, the Úrst with various hits from their career and the second presenting a track by track playing of every songs from their groundbreaking album, Days of Future Passed, which celebrates it’s 50th anniversary this year.c They looked and sounded great, and there was a lot of magic in the air as they recreated this landmark album live on stage. http://rocksubculture.com/2017/06/20/the-moody-blues-at-ironstone-amphitheatre-murphys-california-6182017-concert-review-photos/ 1/10 7/5/2017 The Moody Blues at Ironstone Amphitheatre | Murphys, California | 6/18/2017 (Concert Review + Photos) What: Days of Future Passed 50th Anniversary Tour Who: The Moody Blues Venue: Ironstone Amphitheatre at Ironstone Vineyards Where: Murphys, California Promoter: Richter Entertainment Group When: June 18, 2017 Seating: (house photographer) Richter Entertainment Group’s Summer Concert Season at Ironstone Amphitheatre in Murphys in 2017 features Toby Keith, Boston, Joan Jett & The Blackhearts, John Mellencamp, The Moody Blues, Jason Mraz, Lindsey Buckingham and Christine McVie, matchbox twenty, Counting Crows, Steve Miller Band, Peter Frampton, Willie Nelson, Kenny G, George Benson, and more!c It’s all taking place in June, July, August and September this year.
    [Show full text]
  • How Informal Justice Systems Can Contribute
    United Nations Development Programme Oslo Governance Centre The Democratic Governance Fellowship Programme Doing Justice: How informal justice systems can contribute Ewa Wojkowska, December 2006 United Nations Development Programme – Oslo Governance Centre Contents Contents Contents page 2 Acknowledgements page 3 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations page 4 Research Methods page 4 Executive Summary page 5 Chapter 1: Introduction page 7 Key Definitions: page 9 Chapter 2: Why are informal justice systems important? page 11 UNDP’s Support to the Justice Sector 2000-2005 page 11 Chapter 3: Characteristics of Informal Justice Systems page 16 Strengths page 16 Weaknesses page 20 Chapter 4: Linkages between informal and formal justice systems page 25 Chapter 5: Recommendations for how to engage with informal justice systems page 30 Examples of Indicators page 45 Key features of selected informal justice systems page 47 United Nations Development Programme – Oslo Governance Centre Acknowledgements Acknowledgements I am grateful for the opportunity provided by UNDP and the Oslo Governance Centre (OGC) to undertake this fellowship and thank all OGC colleagues for their kindness and support throughout my stay in Oslo. I would especially like to thank the following individuals for their contributions and support throughout the fellowship period: Toshihiro Nakamura, Nina Berg, Siphosami Malunga, Noha El-Mikawy, Noelle Rancourt, Noel Matthews from UNDP, and Christian Ranheim from the Norwegian Centre for Human Rights. Special thanks also go to all the individuals who took their time to provide information on their experiences of working with informal justice systems and UNDP Indonesia for releasing me for the fellowship period. Any errors or omissions that remain are my responsibility alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Contract and Agreement for Appointed Counsel Services Between the Board of Pardons and Paroles And
    CONTRACT AND AGREEMENT FOR APPOINTED COUNSEL SERVICES BETWEEN THE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES AND ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF TRAVIS § SECTION 1 PARTIES This contract and agreement is made and entered into by and between the Board of Pardons and Paroles, hereinafter referred to as "BPP," and , hereinafter referred to as "Counsel." The parties hereto severally and collectively have agreed and by the execution hereof are bound to the mutual obligations and performance of the tasks hereinafter described. SECTION 2 CONTRACT PERIOD This contract shall commence on September 1, 2011 or if the contract is signed, by any party, after September 1, 2011, on the date last appearing in this contract and agreement shall terminate on August 31, 2012 or when a final order is entered in the any pending parole revocation hearing referenced in Section 4, herein, whichever occurs later, or unless terminated earlier in accordance with the provisions of Section 13, herein. SECTION 3 AUTHORITY AND REPRESENTATIONS The BPP enters into this contract under the authority granted to that Agency by the Constitution and laws of Texas. This contract is not within the purview of, nor is it controlled either by the Consulting Services Act, Section 2254.021 et seq. of the Government Code or the Professional Services Act, Section 2253.042 et seq. of the Government Code. Page 1 of 6 FY12 0701 SECTION 4 OBLIGATION OF COUNSEL Counsel shall provide competent legal representation and advice to certain offenders scheduled to appear at a preliminary and/or revocation hearings, including a continuance and reopening, to consider revocation of their administrative release or other sanctions; or scheduled to appear at an erroneous release hearing to consider their return to prison or other parole vote; and/or to pursue an appeal of the revocation hearing by filing a Motion to Reopen Hearing with the BPP.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture, Context and Mental Health of Somali Refugees
    Culture, context and mental health of Somali refugees A primer for staff working in mental health and psychosocial support programmes I © UNHCR, 2016. All rights reserved Reproduction and dissemination for educational or other non- commercial purposes is authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes, or translation for any purpose, is prohibited without the written permission of the copyright holders. Applications for such permission should be addressed to the Public Health Section of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) at [email protected] This document is commissioned by UNHCR and posted on the UNHCR website. However, the views expressed in this document are those of the authors and not necessarily those of UNHCR or other institutions that the authors serve. The editors and authors have taken all reasonable precautions to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees be liable for damages arising from its use. Suggested citation: Cavallera, V, Reggi, M., Abdi, S., Jinnah, Z., Kivelenge, J., Warsame, A.M., Yusuf, A.M., Ventevogel, P. (2016). Culture, context and mental health of Somali refugees: a primer for staff working in mental health and psychosocial support programmes. Geneva, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Cover photo: Dollo Ado, South East Ethiopia / Refugees are waiting for non-food items like plastic sheets and jerry cans.
    [Show full text]
  • Rule 1A:4. Out-Of-State Lawyers – When Allowed to Participate in a Case Pro Hac Vice
    Rule 1A:4. Out-of-State Lawyers – When Allowed to Participate in a Case Pro Hac Vice. 1. Introduction. A lawyer who is not a member of the Virginia State Bar, but is currently licensed and authorized to practice law in another state, territory, or possession of the United States of America (hereinafter called an “out-of-state lawyer”) may apply to appear as counsel pro hac vice in a particular case before any court, board or administrative agency (hereinafter called “tribunal”) in the Commonwealth of Virginia upon compliance with this rule. 2. Association of Local Counsel. No out-of-state lawyer may appear pro hac vice before any tribunal in Virginia unless the out- of-state lawyer has first associated in that case with a lawyer who is an active member in good standing of the Virginia State Bar (hereinafter called “local counsel”). The name of local counsel shall appear on all notices, orders, pleadings, and other documents filed in the case. Local counsel shall personally appear and participate in pretrial conferences, hearings, trials, or other proceedings actually conducted before the tribunal. Local counsel associating with an out-of-state lawyer in a particular case shall accept joint responsibility with the out-of-state lawyer to the client, other parties, witnesses, other counsel and to the tribunal in that particular case. Any pleading or other paper required to be served (whether relating to discovery or otherwise) shall be invalid unless it is signed by local counsel. The tribunal in which such case is pending shall have full authority to deal with local counsel exclusively in all matters connected with the pending case.
    [Show full text]
  • 199 3. Sixth Amendment — Effective Assistance of Counsel
    2010] THE SUPREME COURT — LEADING CASES 199 3. Sixth Amendment — Effective Assistance of Counsel. — The Sixth Amendment right to counsel has long been recognized as the right to be represented by “effective” counsel.1 In Strickland v. Wash- ington,2 the Supreme Court clarified that counsel is ineffective if two requirements — constitutional deficiency and prejudice — are met.3 Federal and state courts have held, in near unanimity, that the right to effective assistance of counsel extends only to direct consequences of a conviction, not to so-called collateral consequences,4 even though “the imposition of collateral consequences has become an increasingly cen- tral purpose of the modern criminal process.”5 Last Term, in Padilla v. Kentucky,6 the Supreme Court held that criminal defense counsel have an affirmative duty to provide accurate information regarding the de- portation consequences of a guilty plea when those consequences are “clear.”7 In extending Strickland to ineffective assistance claims re- garding deportation, the Court stated that deportation is unique and difficult to classify as either a direct or a collateral consequence of conviction.8 The Court implicitly rejected the current approaches to determining Strickland’s reach and created a new category of covered topics that cannot reasonably be restricted to the deportation conse- quence alone. Lower courts will likely struggle over which other con- sequences — previously excluded from Strickland’s coverage — are similarly “unique.” Jose Padilla has resided in the United States as a lawful permanent resident for over forty years.9 Padilla pleaded guilty to three drug- related charges after he was indicted in Hardin County, Kentucky.10 Padilla claimed that he entered his guilty plea in reliance upon his at- torney’s advice that he “did not have to worry about immigration sta- tus since he had been in the country so long.”11 In fact, however, his conviction resulted in nearly automatic deportation.12 Padilla filed for ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 1 See McMann v.
    [Show full text]
  • Probike/Prowalk Florida City Comes up with the Right Answers Florida Bike Summit Brought Advocacy to Lawmakers' Door
    Vol. 13, No. 2 Spring 2010 OFFICIAL NEWSLETTER OF THE FLORIDA BICYCLE ASSOCIATION, INC. Reviewing the April 8 event. Florida Bike Summit brought Lakeland: ProBike/ProWalk advocacy to lawmakers’ doorstep Florida city comes up with the right answers by Laura Hallam, FBA Executive Director photos: by Herb Hiller Yes, yes, yes and no. Woman’s Club, Lakeland Chamber of Keri Keri Caffrey Four answers to four questions you may be Commerce, fine houses and historical mark- asking: ers that celebrate the good sense of people 1. Shall I attend ProBike/ProWalk Florida who, starting 125 years ago, settled this rail- in May? road town. 2. Shall I come early and/or stay in I might add about those people who settled Lakeland after the conference? Lakeland that they also had the good fortune 3. Is Lakeland not only the most beautiful of having Publix headquarter its enterprise mid-sized city in Florida but also, rare here, so that subsequent generations of among cities of any size, year by year get- Jenkins folk could endow gardens, children’s ting better? play areas and everything else that makes photos: Courtesy of Central Visitor Florida & Bureau Convention Above: Kathryn Moore, Executive Director embers of FBA from of the So. Fla. Bike Coalition (right), works around the state gath- the FBA booth. Below: Representative ered with Bike Florida Adam Fetterman takes the podium. at the Capitol for the 2nd annual Florida Bike Summit. Modeled after the high- ly successful National PAID Bike Summit that recently NONPROFIT U.S. POSTAGE POSTAGE U.S. PERMIT No.
    [Show full text]
  • Approve Agreement for Regional Bike Share Program
    Item #17-5-16 SACOG Board of Directors Action April 17, 2017 Approve Agreement for Regional Bike Share Program Issue: Should SACOG enter into an agreement with Social Bicycles (SoBi) for a Regional Bike Share Program? Recommendation: SACOG staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chief Executive Officer to execute an agreement with SoBi for a Regional Bike Share Program. (See Attachment 1, Program Agreement between Social Bicycles Inc. and Sacramento Area Council of Governments for Sacramento Area Bikeshare.) Committee Action/Discussion: Background On March 16, 2017, SACOG staff recommended to the SACOG Board approval of a contract with SoBi for a regional bike share system of 900 smart bikes. However, in light of an unsolicited proposal to the City of West Sacramento for a dockless bike share system, the SACOG Board tabled the staff recommendation and asked staff to: 1) If possible, finalize the agreement with Social Bicycles for future Board consideration; and 2) Consider alternative approaches, either with or without a new operator in the marketplace, to the model SACOG has been developing for a regional bike share system. On April 4, the Bike Share Policy Steering Committee (PSC) met to review an alternative approach to SoBi’s previous proposal for a regional bike share system. The PSC agenda included: 1) A SACOG staff briefing on dockless bike share systems; 2) A SACOG staff presentation on an alternative term sheet with SoBi; 3) A presentation from Ryan Rzepecki, CEO of SoBi, describing dockless bike share systems and SoBi’s alternative approach to delivering a regional bike share system; and 4) An update from Mayor Cabaldon on the City of West Sacramento’s action authorizing the City Manager and Mayor to negotiate and execute an agreement with LimeBike, a dockless bike share system operator.
    [Show full text]