No Fire Zone: the Killing Fields of Sri Lanka Organize Your Film Screening

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

No Fire Zone: the Killing Fields of Sri Lanka Organize Your Film Screening 1 No Fire Zone: The Killing Fields of Sri Lanka Organize Your Film Screening Dear%Activist,% This screening guide contains tips and suggestions for planning your No Fire Zone: The Killing Fields of Sri Lanka screening and discussion, as well as background on the situation in Sri Lanka and a Q&A on the documentary. Successful film screenings will not only raise awareness about the situation in Sri Lanka but also generate discussion and action about the issues raised in the film. To assist you in organizing an effective screening event, this guide includes: Background on Sri Lanka .....................................................................page 3 Q&A on No Fire Zone: The Killing Fields of Sri Lanka.......................page 6 Six Steps to Organizing a Successful Film Screening ..........................page 7 Event Planning Checklist ......................................................................page 10 Sample Agenda for Your Film Screening Event ...................................page 11 Tips for Facilitators ...............................................................................page 12 Driving up Attendance for Your Event .................................................page 14 Top Five Screening Ideas for Local Groups ..........................................page 16 Building the Momentum: Follow-up Action--- .....................................page 17 Sample Event Flyer ................................................................................page 19 Event Sign-in Sheet ................................................................................page 20 Please don’t hesitate to be in touch with us with any questions, concerns, ideas and suggestions. Good luck organizing your event! We look forward to hearing about your local successes? In solidarity, The Sri Lanka team at AIUSA **Please note: some of the scenes in the film are very disturbing. It is NOT for younger viewers.! Contact Information: Jim McDonald, AIUSA Sri Lanka Country Specialist Email: [email protected] Twitter: @jmccdon Facebook: Jim McDonald Aiusa Srilanka! 2 Background on Sri Lanka Background During 1983 - 2009, Sri Lanka was wracked by a civil war between the security forces (who are mostly from the majority Sinhalese community) and the armed Tamil opposition group, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), who were seeking an independent state for the Tamil minority in the north and east of the island. While human rights abuses were committed by both sides during the long decades of conflict, the final years of the war saw a heightened intensity of fighting, accompanied by soaring human rights abuses: hundreds of enforced disappearances, targeted and indiscriminate attacks against civilians, arbitrary arrests, torture and the use of child soldiers. Some of these abuses may constitute war crimes. An independent international investigation into these reported abuses is needed in order to achieve truth and justice for the victims and their families. On March 27, 2014, the U.N. Human Rights Council finally authorized the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights to carry out such an investigation. In recent years, cases of torture and enforced disappearances have continued to be reported, with no one being held responsible. Outside the war zone, journalists and other media workers have been attacked. At least 14 media workers have been the victims of unlawful killings since the beginning of 2006; one has allegedly disappeared in the custody of the security forces, while others have been tortured and arbitrarily detained. Draconian anti-terrorism laws have been used to silence critical media and generally violate freedom of expression in Sri Lanka, including through detention without charge or trial for periods lasting up to 18 months. Sri Lanka’s Obligations Under International Law International humanitarian law applies to internal armed conflicts like the one in Sri Lanka and applies to both the Sri Lankan government and the LTTE. In particular, Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions (to which Sri Lanka is a party) prohibits the killing of civilians through indiscriminate shelling, deliberate attacks against civilians or civilian objects (such as hospitals and food distribution lines), and the denial of medical care to the sick and wounded. The Sri Lankan government forces are reported to have committed these acts during the final months of the war. Some of the actions of the government forces also violated international human rights law, including alleged enforced disappearances, arbitrary arrests and torture of detainees. International humanitarian law also applies to the LTTE and forbids the taking of hostages (including forcibly using civilians as “human shields”), deliberate killings of civilians fleeing the war zone, locating military objects near densely populated areas, the recruitment of child soldiers and the use of forced labor. The LTTE is reported as having committed these abuses during the final months of the war. 3 Some violations of international humanitarian law amount to war crimes; others may constitute crimes against humanity. In the case of Sri Lanka, the following reported acts of the government forces may be war crimes: intentional and indiscriminate attacks on civilians, attacks against medical facilities, starvation of the civilian population in the war zone, and enforced disappearances. The LTTE may have committed war crimes by deliberately attacking civilians and forcibly recruiting child soldiers. Human Rights Crimes Allegedly Committed Amnesty International has interviewed Sri Lankan war survivors who say that the Sri Lankan army and the LTTE both committed war crimes, including targeted and indiscriminate attacks against civilians. The extent of violations in the later stages of the conflict remains unknown, however, following a government crackdown on independent reporting on the conflict beginning in 2008. By denying access to the conflict zone to UN agencies, humanitarian, human rights and other non- governmental organizations, as well as international journalists, the government excluded international scrutiny and effectively denied urgent critical humanitarian assistance to civilians. A Sri Lankan government statement that approximately 3,000 to 5,000 civilians were killed in the last phase of the war is considered by many to be vastly underestimated. Estimates by the UN based on a daily count up to April 2009 put the civilian death toll at about 7,000; and it was estimated by some aid workers that as many as 1,000 civilians a day may have died after that. Unofficial estimates by UN personnel present in Sri Lanka during the final phase of fighting say that more than 20,000 people (and possibly up to 40,000) people may have been killed between January and May 2009. ! The Current Situation The failure to act has left victims of human rights violations without access to justice, truth or reparations. Hundreds of thousands of Sri Lankans displaced at the end of the decades-long conflict struggle to rebuild their shattered communities in heavily militarized surroundings, with many still looking for justice for their killed relatives or waiting for word of the fate of their family members arrested at the end of the war. The U.N.’s recently authorized international inquiry into war crimes and crimes against humanity in Sri Lanka brings new hope for thousands of victims of abuses in the country. It is important that the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights be provided the necessary material and political support to make the investigation as robust and far-reaching as possible, with an aim of establishing the truth and tackling impunity for past violations. 4 Since the end of the war, the Sri Lankan government has not only failed to provide accountability for war crimes, it has launched an aggressive campaign against those in Sri Lanka advocating for accountability and an end to impunity. Human rights defenders, journalists and activists critical of the government have been threatened and harassed. The draconian Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) has been used to detain without charge or trial peaceful critics and those suspected of links to the LTTE. Torture of prisoners is common in Sri Lanka despite laws prohibiting it. The PTA facilitates torture by reversing the burden of proof where torture or ill-treatment of detainees is alleged. Hundreds continue to languish in prison without ever being charged with a crime or given a trial. Arrests under the PTA are continuing to be made by the security forces. What is Amnesty asking for? Amnesty International is asking that the Sri Lankan government: (1) repeal the Prevention of Terrorism Act and abolish the system of administrative detention in Sri Lanka; (2) release all individuals who have been arrested under emergency or anti-terrorism laws (including the PTA), unless they are promptly charged with a recognizable criminal offense and given a fair trial in accordance with international standards; (3) provide adequate medical care and compensation to torture victims; and (4) investigate and prosecute those responsible for torture. Additional Resources Check out amnestyusa.org/srilanka for the latest reports, press releases and other AI documents on Sri Lanka. Please take action for human rights in Sri Lanka by sending online letters to the Sri Lankan government; go to tinyurl.com/SriLankanonlineactions to find the latest AI actions on Sri Lanka. 5 Q&A on No Fire Zone: The Killing Fields of Sri Lanka What is “No Fire Zone: The Killing
Recommended publications
  • Report of the Secretary-General's
    REPORT OF THE SECRETARY -GENERAL ’S INTERNAL REVIEW PANEL ON UNITED NATIONS ACTION IN SRI LANKA November 2012 Contents I. The Secretary-General’s Internal Review Panel ............................................................................. 4 II. The events and United Nations actions ………………………………………………………......... 5 A. Lead up to the final stages 2007/2008............................................................................................ 5 B. The Final stages – August 2008/May 2009 ................................................................................... 8 C. The Aftermath – May 2009 onward................................................................................................ 14 III. Assessment of United Nations action to meet its protection and humanitarian responsibilities in Sri Lanka ………………................................................................................................................. 17 A. Assessment of UN action: dilemmas and responsibilities ..………………………....................... 17 1. Relocation …………………………………………………………………………................ 17 2. Humanitarian access and obstructions to humanitarian assistance ………………................. 18 3. International human rights and humanitarian law in protection and humanitarian action ...... 18 4. Oversight, management and coordination of United Nations action and responsibilities ...... 22 5. UN political engagement and the responsibilities of Member States …….............................. 24 6. UN failure …………………………………………………………………...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the OHCHR Investigation on Sri Lanka (OISL)* **
    A/HRC/30/CRP.2 Advance Version Distr.: Restricted 16 September 2015 English only Human Rights Council Thirtieth session Agenda item 2 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General Report of the OHCHR Investigation on Sri Lanka (OISL)* ** * Reproduced as received ** The information contained in this document should be read in conjunction with the report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights- Promoting reconciliation, accountability and human rights in Sri Lanka (A/HRC/30/61). A/HRC/30/CRP.2 Contents Paragraphs Page Part 1 I. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1–13 5 II. Establishment of the OHCHR Investigation on Sri Lanka (OISL), mandate and methodology ............................................................................................................. 14–46 7 III. Contextual background ........................................................................................... 47–103 12 IV. Overview of Government, LTTE and other armed groups...................................... 104–170 22 V. Legal framework ..................................................................................................... 171–208 36 Part 2– Thematic Chapters VI. Unlawful killings ..................................................................................................... 209–325 47 VII. Violations related to the
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Secretary-General's Panel Of
    REPORT OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL’S PANEL OF EXPERTS ON ACCOUNTABILITY IN SRI LANKA 31 March 2011 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL’S PANEL OF EXPERTS ON ACCOUNTABILITY IN SRI LANKA Executive Summary On 22 June 2010, the Secretary-General announced the appointment of a Panel of Experts to advise him on the implementation of the joint commitment included in the statement issued by the President of Sri Lanka and the Secretary-General at the conclusion of the Secretary-General’s visit to Sri Lanka on 23 March 2009. In the Joint Statement, the Secretary-General “underlined the importance of an accountability process”, and the Government of Sri Lanka agreed that it “will take measures to address those grievances”. The Panel’s mandate is to advise the Secretary- General regarding the modalities, applicable international standards and comparative experience relevant to an accountability process, having regard to the nature and scope of alleged violations of international humanitarian and human rights law during the final stages of the armed conflict in Sri Lanka. The Secretary-General appointed as members of the Panel Marzuki Darusman (Indonesia), Chair; Steven Ratner (United States); and Yasmin Sooka (South Africa). The Panel formally commenced its work on 16 September 2010 and was assisted throughout by a secretariat. Framework for the Panel’s work In order to understand the accountability obligations arising from the last stages of the war, the Panel undertook an assessment of the “nature and scope of alleged violations” as required by its Terms of Reference. The Panel’s mandate however does not extend to fact- finding or investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Operation Factual Analysis July 2006 – May 2009
    HUMANITARIAN OPERATION FACTUAL ANALYSIS JULY 2006 – MAY 2009 MINISTRY OF DEFENCE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA HUMANITARIAN OPERATION FACTUAL ANALYSIS JULY 2006 – MAY 2009 MINISTRY OF DEFENCE JULY 2011 DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA Humanitarian Operation—Factual Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A. Overview of this Report 1 B. Overview of the Humanitarian Operation 1 PART ONE II. BACKGROUND 4 A. Overview of the LTTE 4 B. LTTE Atrocities against Civilians 6 C. Use of Child Soldiers by the LTTE 10 D. Ethnic Cleansing Carried out by the LTTE 10 E. Attacks on Democracy by the LTTE 11 F. The Global Threat posed by the LTTE 11 G. Proscription of the LTTE 12 III. SIZE AND SCOPE OF THE LTTE 13 A. Potency of the LTTE 13 B. Number of Cadres 14 C. Land Fighting Forces 14 D. The Sea Tiger Wing 17 E. The Air Tiger Wing 20 F. Black Tiger (Suicide) Wing 22 G. Intelligence Wing 22 H. Supply Network 23 I. International Support Mechanisms 25 J. International Criminal Network 27 – iii – Humanitarian Operation—Factual Analysis Page IV. GOVERNMENT EFFORTS FOR A NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT 28 A. Overview 28 B. The Thimpu Talks – July to August 1985 29 C. The Indo-Lanka Accord – July 1987 30 D. Peace Talks – May 1989 to June 1990 32 E. Peace Talks – October 1994 to April 1995 33 F. Norwegian-Facilitated Peace Process – February 2002 to January 2008 35 G. LTTE Behaviour during 2002–2006 37 PART TWO V. RESUMPTION OF HOSTILITIES 43 VI. THE WANNI OPERATION 52 VII.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taming of the Tigers Contemporary Battlefield Assessment of the April 2017 Counterinsurgency in Revised, April 2020* Sri Lanka
    An MWI The Taming of the Tigers Contemporary Battlefield Assessment of the April 2017 Counterinsurgency in Revised, April 2020* Sri Lanka Lionel Beehner Liam Collins Steven Ferenzi Mike Jackson Contents About the CBA & Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Section I: Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 6 Methodology & Case Selection ................................................................................................................ 7 Outline of Report ...................................................................................................................................... 8 Background of the War ............................................................................................................................. 8 India’s Involvement in the War .............................................................................................................. 10 Explaining the Success of the Tigers’ Insurgency ................................................................................... 12 Section II: Lessons from Sri Lanka’s Counterinsurgency ............................................................................. 14 Lesson 1: Force Structure Adaptations
    [Show full text]
  • Sri Lanka's Assault on Dissent
    SECURITY WITH HUMAN RIGHTS SRI LANKA’S ASSAULT ON DISSENT Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 3 million supporters, members and activists in more than 150 countries and territories who campaign to end grave abuses of human rights. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. First published in 2013 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW United Kingdom © Amnesty International 2013 Index: ASA 37/003/2013 English Original language: English Printed by Amnesty International, International Secretariat, United Kingdom All rights reserved. This publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. The copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. For copying in any other circumstances, or for reuse in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. To request permission, or for any other inquiries, please contact [email protected] Cover photo : Police use water cannon on peaceful demonstrators protesting against rising fuel costs in Colombo, Sri Lanka, February 2012. © AP Photo/Eranga Jayawardena amnesty.org CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................7 Methodology ................................................................................................................10 The right to freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association in Sri Lanka........10 II.
    [Show full text]
  • Kamal Gunaratne Secretary of Defence Sri Lanka
    KAMAL GUNARATNE SECRETARY OF DEFENCE SRI LANKA Dossier December 2019 1 MAJOR GENERAL (RET.) GABADAGE DON HARISCHANDRA KAMAL GUNARATNE 53 Division Commander in 2009 Currently Secretary of Defence and Sri Lankan Army Reserve Force. 2 SUMMARY Sri Lanka’s new secretary of defence commanded one of the most important military divisions in the 2009 war in the Vanni when the United Nations says there are reasonable grounds to say war crimes were committed by the men under his command. It is noteworthy that though appointed to a civilian post, he received a military parade at his inauguration1 and remains in the Army’s Reserve Force2. He went on to run Sri Lanka’s most notorious army torture camp in Vavuniya for 18 months after the war at a time of mass detention. The ITJP has documented ten accounts of torture and/or sexual violence committed by soldiers against detainees in that period and this is likely the tip of the iceberg. There is no way as the camp commander he could not have known about detention there – this was not a legal detention site but contained purpose-built cells equipped for torture. Kamal Gunaratne was also in charge post-war of internally displaced people – this was the illegal detention of 282,000 Tamil civilians who survived the war in Manik Farm and other sites. He also appears to have been involved in screening IDP’s for suspected ex combatants and putting them in the government’s “rehabilitation programme” which constituted wrongful detention according to the UN3. After the war as a diplomat, Gunaratne is alleged to have been involved in a murder in the Embassy in Brazil when posted there.
    [Show full text]
  • GJ and Others (Post-Civil War: Returnees) Sri Lanka CG [2013] UKUT 00319 (IAC)
    Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) GJ and Others (post-civil war: returnees) Sri Lanka CG [2013] UKUT 00319 (IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Determination Promulgated On 5 – 8 and 11-12 February 2013, 15 March 2013 and 19 April 2013. ………………………………… Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE GLEESON UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE DAWSON UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE O'CONNOR Between GJ NT MP Appellants and THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Respondent and TAMILS AGAINST GENOCIDE Interested Party © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2013 Representation: For the First Appellant : Miss Shivani Jegarajah and Mr Iain Palmer, instructed by Patricks solicitors. For the Second Appellant: Mr Rudolph Spurling and Miss Sara Anzani, instructed by Dean Manson Solicitors For the Third Appellant: Mr Alasdair Mackenzie and Miss Alison Pickup, instructed by Birnberg Peirce & Partners, solicitors For the Interested Party: Miss Shivani Jegarajah and Mr Colin Yeo instructed by Duncan Lewis, solicitors For the Respondent: Mr Jonathan Hall and Mr William Hays, instructed by The Treasury Solicitor (1 ) This determination replaces all existing country guidance on Sri Lanka. (2) The focus of the Sri Lankan government’s concern has changed since the civil war ended in May 2009. The LTTE in Sri Lanka itself is a spent force and there have been no terrorist incidents since the end of the civil war. (3) The government’s present objective is to identify Tamil activists in the diaspora who are working for Tamil separatism and to destabilise the unitary Sri Lankan state enshrined in Amendment 6(1) to the Sri Lankan Constitution in 1983, which prohibits the ‘violation of territorial integrity’ of Sri Lanka.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case Study of Sri Lanka and the Collective Action Theory of Genocide
    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Electronic Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Major Papers 2016 "Never Again": The aC se Study of Sri Lanka and the Collective Action Theory of Genocide Maiuran Satgunarajah University of Windsor Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd Recommended Citation Satgunarajah, Maiuran, ""Never Again": The asC e Study of Sri Lanka and the Collective Action Theory of Genocide" (2016). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 5915. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/5915 This online database contains the full-text of PhD dissertations and Masters’ theses of University of Windsor students from 1954 forward. These documents are made available for personal study and research purposes only, in accordance with the Canadian Copyright Act and the Creative Commons license—CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivative Works). Under this license, works must always be attributed to the copyright holder (original author), cannot be used for any commercial purposes, and may not be altered. Any other use would require the permission of the copyright holder. Students may inquire about withdrawing their dissertation and/or thesis from this database. For additional inquiries, please contact the repository administrator via email ([email protected]) or by telephone at 519-253-3000ext. 3208. “Never Again”: The Case Study of Sri Lanka and the Collective Action Theory of Genocide by Maiuran Satgunarajah A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies through the
    [Show full text]
  • Peoples Tribunal on Sri Lanka, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland 14-16 January 2010
    Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal Peoples’ Tribunal on Sri Lanka 1 Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal Peoples’ Tribunal on Sri Lanka Copyright © Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal & The International Human Rights Association - Bremen 2014 The International Human Rights Association - Bremen (IMRV) wishes to state, that the copyright for printing and publishing of all languages of the findings document of the People's Tribunal on Sri Lanka (PTSL) rests solely with the Permanent People's Tribunal (PPT) and the IMRV. Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal Founder Lelio Basso (Italy) President Salvatore Senese (Italy) General Secretary Gianni Tognoni (Italy) Fondazione Lelio Basso Sezione Internazionale, Via della Dogana Vecchia, 5 - 00186 Roma, Italia Tel/Fax: 0039 066877774 E-mail:[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Web: http://www.internazionaleleliobasso.it 2 Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal Peoples’ Tribunal on Sri Lanka Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal Peoples’ Tribunal on Sri Lanka 07-10 December 2013 HOSTED BY Gemeindezentrum und Kirche St. Pauli Bremen, Germany ORGANIZED BY International Human Rights Association - Bremen [email protected] Irish Forum for Peace in Sri Lanka [email protected] CONDUCTED BY Permanent People’s Tribunal Fondazione Lelio Basso Sezione Internazionale Via della Dogana Vecchia 5 - 00186 Roma Italia [email protected] 3 Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal Peoples’ Tribunal on Sri Lanka Contents Members of the Panel 05 1. The Competence of the Permanent People’s Tribunal 07 2. The Judgment of Session I on Sri Lanka - Dublin, January 2010 09 3. Complaints 11 4. The Defence 13 5. Judgement 15 6. Recommendations 39 7. Concluding Remarks 42 8. Appendix I: Excerpts from the closing statement for the prosecution 43 9.
    [Show full text]
  • The Uncorrupted Truth
    The Uncorrupted Truth A detailed rebuttal of “Corrupted Journalism: Channel 4 and Sri Lanka” Callum Macrae “No Fire Zone is one of the most chilling documentaries I’ve watched…. Many of the images are truly shocking….” “This documentary raises very serious questions that the Sri Lankan government must answer about what it did to protect innocent civilians. Questions that strengthen the case for an independent investigation. Questions that need answers if Sri Lanka is to build the truly peaceful and inclusive future its people deserve.” David Cameron, British Prime Minister 2 A detailed rebuttal of “Corrupted Journalism: Channel 4 and Sri Lanka” Channel 4’s coverage of the final months of the civil war in Sri Lanka and its exposure of allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity have reverberated around the world. Its coverage of the war between the separatist rebels known as the Tamil Tigers, and the government of Sri Lanka included reports by Channel 4 News, two multi-award winning TV documentaries, Sri Lanka’s Killing Fields and War Crimes Unpunished, and a 90 minute feature documentary No Fire Zone. The coverage has been cited as particularly influential by the UN, was praised by the British Prime Minister and even saw its production team nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize. But this journalism has not been popular everywhere. At the end of 2013 an organization called Engage Sri Lanka, which says its mission is to promote trade between the UK and Sri Lanka, published a hefty 222 page book called Corrupted Journalism: Channel 4 and Sri Lanka, which professed to demonstrate in considerable detail that Channel 4’s journalism was variously unfair, inaccurate, biased and shoddy.
    [Show full text]
  • “Wherever in This World I Live, Achieving Tamil Eelam Is My Conviction”
    “Wherever in This World I Live, Achieving Tamil Eelam is My Conviction” Long Distance Nationalism Among Second Generation Sri Lankan Tamils in Toronto Prabhath Udugampola Thesis Adviser: Professor Christine Philliou Department of History Columbia University April 2010 Contents Introduction ……………………………………………………………. ……….01 1. Background and Setting I Post-independence Sri Lanka and the Ethnic Conflict……………………..13 II Sri Lankan Tamils in Canada………………………………………………20 III Research Setting……………………………………………………………25 2. Remembering Eelam I Golden Eelam………………………………………………………………28 II Remembrance………………………………………………………………30 III Large Houses……………………………………………………………….31 IV Ethic of Hard Work and Industry…………………………………………. 35 3. Forgetting Differences I Forgetting …………………………………………………………………..39 II Regional Differences………………………………………………………..40 III Caste Differences…………………………………………………………...44 IV The “Special Case” of Muslims……………………………………………..46 V Second Generation Brotherhood……………………………………………48 VI Turmoil and Egalitarian Pressures…………………………………………..51 4. The Master Narrative: Ignorance and the LTTE I Ignorance………………………………………………………….. ……….54 II Profiling Tigers……………………………………………………………...55 III Tamilnet……………………………………………………………………..59 IV The Master Narrative………………………………………………………..61 V Culture of Victimhood……………………………………………………....62 VI Territory……………………………………………………………………..68 VII History………………………………………………………………………70 VIII Human Rights……………………………………………………………….74 5. The Catalyst: The Final Phase of the Civil War and Cyber Nation I The Final Phase……………………………………………………………...78
    [Show full text]