On the WLF Legal Pulse 2009 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 202.588.0302 Wlf.Org Timely Commentary from WLF’S Blog January 27, 2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

On the WLF Legal Pulse 2009 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 202.588.0302 Wlf.Org Timely Commentary from WLF’S Blog January 27, 2020 Washington Legal Foundation ® Advocate for Freedom and Justice 2009 Massachusetts Avenue, NW On the WLF Legal Pulse Washington, DC 20036 202.588.0302 wlf.org Timely commentary from WLF’s blog January 27, 2020 TEEN VAPING IS BAD. SO ARE MANY AD CAMPAIGNS AGAINST TEEN VAPING. by Corbin K. Barthold Bright children are often skeptical of authority. They spot early on that many adults are stupid, and that the self-righteous ones are reliably the stupidest of all. The most strenuous posturing, they quickly realize, is usually the most spurious as well. The young’s awareness that the old don’t know what they’re doing is a central theme of the television show South Park. Take the episode “Butt Out,” in which the show’s protagonists, four fourth- grade boys named Stan, Kyle, Cartman, and Kenny, are made to attend an anti-smoking assembly. Wearing baseball caps at odd angles, the adult speakers inflict on their audience a nauseating medley of obtuse raps and role-plays on the dangers of cigarettes. The effects of smoking are “none to the cool,” one of them declares at the end. “Word!” replies another. “If you don’t smoke, you could grow up to be just like us!” they all then shout. Alarmed at this prospect, the boys hurriedly procure some cigarettes and try to smoke them in a back alley. Anti-tobacco campaigners try ever so hard to be hip. No one tries harder than the Truth Initiative. They employ outdated internet memes, puppets mimicking the Breakfast Club, and zombies harassing innocent store clerks. Their actors can be awkward and theatrical, their messages ham-handed and overwrought. Their more cringeworthy efforts seem, at least to this captious grown viewer, almost to shout at the Stans and Kyles of the class to give smoking a chance. Badly designed ads can indeed have such a rebound effect. To their credit, however, the Truth campaigners have largely avoided this trap. Their ads revolve around teens having substance-free fun, and the evidence suggests that such ads can work. South Park’s “Butt Out” assembly isn’t just condescending; it’s hypocritical and illogical. The speakers tell the students not to believe “what those evil tobacco companies tell you,” but they also imply that smoking leads to abortion and AIDS. It’s a slightly exaggerated take on the very real tendency of anti-tobacco activists to flaunt a self-assured fury at the lies of others while peddling deceits of their own. A person is playing fast and loose with causation, for example, if she tells you that “Big Tobacco” sells a product that “created” a 20% “wage gap” between smokers and non-smokers. These days the dubious claims are about vaping. Many ads denounce the Juul pod for containing as much nicotine as 20 cigarettes, even though each pod is meant to provide many cigarettes’ worth of vaping time. Other ads emphasize that people who vape are more likely to try smoking—causation versus correlation be damned. An ad produced by the State of California depicts vaping teens as terrifying rage monkeys, as though nicotine, which the ad calls “brain poison,” were PCP. ________________________ Corbin K. Barthold is Senior Litigation Counsel with Washington Legal Foundation. On the WLF Legal Pulse January 23, 2020 Manufacturing a cool image to stop teens from smoking is one thing; broadcasting half-truths to stop them vaping is another. Sadly, the teen vaping rate is rising. But the teen smoking rate is still falling—faster than ever, in fact—and it’s a good, even if not ideal, thing if teens switch from the one vice to the other. “No one knows the long-term effects of Juuling,” warns one ad. True enough, but those long-term effects, whatever they are, will almost certainly be better than the long-term effects of smoking. The Royal College of Physicians has found, for instance, that “the hazard to health arising from long-term vapour inhalation from ecigarettes” is “unlikely to exceed 5% of the harm from smoking tobacco.” According to Pew Research Center, more than two-thirds of Americans believe that the federal government “intentionally withholds important information from the public.” Well, the federal government does not sponsor ads that say vaping is likely safer than smoking, and that urge smokers to switch to ecigarettes. No, it sponsors ads that make vapor particulates look worse than the Ebola virus. It’s a wonder the level of distrust is not higher. A recent study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that ecigarettes were “more effective for smoking cessation than nicotine-replacement therapy.” The advent of ecigarettes could save countless lives. Forward-thinking policymakers love “harm reduction” when the drug in question is heroin. Why do these tolerant Bohemians become prohibitionist Victorians when they turn to nicotine? Why does San Francisco distribute free needles but bar the sale of vaping products? It can’t be that black-market pods filled with THC have recently caused thousands of injuries and dozens of deaths. Although nearly 50,000 people died from opioids in 2017, San Francisco’s leaders are pushing not for stricter bans, but for safe-injection sites. And pushing drugs off the black market was presented as a ground for expanding access to legal marijuana. (So far, by the way, the plan hasn’t worked. It turns out that a well-established black market can outcompete a legal market smothered in red tape and taxes. Who’d have guessed.) Part of the problem is surely that the vaping industry is dominated by a few large companies, including traditional tobacco companies. The politicians who run our big cities think of themselves as belonging to the party of science. Sometimes it is better described as the party afraid that someone, somewhere, might be turning a profit. In the end, however, the issue seems cultural. Many societal disputes pit the top and the bottom against the middle. In this instance the top set the drug laws, the bottom shoot heroin, and the middle vape. (All three smoke marijuana.) As in days of old, the nobility looks after the peasantry but hates the bourgeoisie. Put another way, our professional and political optimates celebrate diversity until they don’t. One exotic creature, the average inhabitant of the American hinterland, they fear and disdain. They want to silence and control him. And when they picture someone vaping, they picture him. South Park captures the pertinent attitude and approach in a satirical exchange between Rob Reiner, the Hollywood director and activist, and an everyman smoking in a rural bar: Reiner: Oh my God! Excuse me! Rural man: Yes? Reiner: Would you mind putting that death stick out? Rural man: But, uh, this is a bar. Reiner: Isn’t smoking illegal in bars here? Rural man: Not in Colorado. © 2020 Washington Legal Foundation 2 On the WLF Legal Pulse January 27, 2020 Reiner: Oh my God! What kind of backward hick state is this?! Rural man: Look man, I work fourteen hours a day at a saw mill. I just got off work and I need to relax. Reiner: Well when I relax I just go to my vacation house in Hawaii! Rural man: I ain’t got a vacation house in Hawaii. Reiner: Your vacation house in Mexico, then; whatever! Reiner then declares that he will end smoking in Colorado bars. “Isn’t he awesome, you guys?” Cartman, the notorious junior fascist, remarks, awestruck, to his friends. “He just goes around imposing his will on people.” Everyone takes for granted that teen vaping is bad. No doubt it is—all things being equal. But as Matt Stone, one of South Park’s creators, once said, the young are “not nice, innocent, flower-loving little rainbow children.” Many teens will commit a few offenses precisely because they’ve explicitly been told not to commit them. It is worth asking, therefore, not whether vaping is dangerous, but whether it is dangerous relative to other forbidden fruits. If a defiant teenager is bent on breaking the rules, and his options for doing so are snorting cocaine, smoking weed, binge drinking, smoking tobacco, huffing solvents, or vaping, do we want him convinced that vaping is the most hazardous option? The alternative to thinking this way is to assume that with the right set of policies and the right educational campaigns, we can suppress risk-seeking behavior among adolescents. Put to one side whether, teens being what they are, we actually could do that. Would we want to? Would we want kids not to question the po-faced adults? It’s hard to know. This much, however, can confidently be said: those who argue for making children safer and more docile will always have the upper hand. Anyone with a puritanical streak can trot out the figures on how many teenagers are engaged in, or hurt by, this or that sin. The consequences of making the young risk-averse and unadventurous, meanwhile, are indirect and diffuse. A mother whose teenage son gets drunk and falls from a balcony will not agree that his death was the price of maintaining the nation’s daring pioneer spirit. Nor should she. She will probably no longer see a dose of rebellion as a good in itself. Nor need she. But that’s not the end of it. The logic by which safety beats freedom has legs. One can plausibly attack any youth activity that creates modest risks and offers only vague benefits. Children certainly don’t need to wrestle or tackle, to throw dodge balls or head soccer balls, to roll on skateboards or sway on swings, to eat candy or drink soda, or to play violent video games.
Recommended publications
  • View/Method……………………………………………………9
    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date:___________________July 23, 2007 I, ________________________________________________Julie M. Stewart _________, hereby submit this work as part of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Arts in: Communication It is entitled: The Rhetoric of South Park This work and its defense approved by: Chair: _______________________________Dr. John Lynch _______________________________Dr. Stephen Depoe _______________________________Dr. William Jennings _______________________________ _______________________________ THE RHETORIC OF SOUTH PARK A thesis submitted to the Division of Graduate Studies and Research Of the University of Cincinnati MASTER OF ARTS In the Department of Communication, of the College of Arts and Sciences 2007 by Julie Stewart B.A. Xavier University, 2001 Committee Chair: Dr. John Lynch Abstract This study examines the rhetoric of the cartoon South Park. South Park is a popular culture artifact that deals with numerous contemporary social and political issues. A narrative analysis of nine episodes of the show finds multiple themes. First, South Park is successful in creating a polysemous political message that allows audiences with varying political ideologies to relate to the program. Second, South Park ’s universal appeal is in recurring populist themes that are anti-hypocrisy, anti-elitism, and anti- authority. Third, the narrative functions to develop these themes and characters, setting, and other elements of the plot are representative of different ideologies. Finally, this study concludes
    [Show full text]
  • Emotional and Linguistic Analysis of Dialogue from Animated Comedies: Homer, Hank, Peter and Kenny Speak
    Emotional and Linguistic Analysis of Dialogue from Animated Comedies: Homer, Hank, Peter and Kenny Speak. by Rose Ann Ko2inski Thesis presented as a partial requirement in the Master of Arts (M.A.) in Human Development School of Graduate Studies Laurentian University Sudbury, Ontario © Rose Ann Kozinski, 2009 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington OttawaONK1A0N4 OttawaONK1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-57666-3 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-57666-3 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • South Park and Absurd Culture War Ideologies, the Art of Stealthy Conservatism Drew W
    University of Texas at El Paso DigitalCommons@UTEP Open Access Theses & Dissertations 2009-01-01 South Park and Absurd Culture War Ideologies, The Art of Stealthy Conservatism Drew W. Dungan University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd Part of the Mass Communication Commons, and the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Dungan, Drew W., "South Park and Absurd Culture War Ideologies, The Art of Stealthy Conservatism" (2009). Open Access Theses & Dissertations. 245. https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd/245 This is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UTEP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UTEP. For more information, please contact [email protected]. South Park and Absurd Culture War Ideologies, The Art of Stealthy Conservatism Drew W. Dungan Department of Communication APPROVED: Richard D. Pineda, Ph.D., Chair Stacey Sowards, Ph.D. Robert L. Gunn, Ph.D. Patricia D. Witherspoon, Ph.D. Dean of the Graduate School Copyright © by Drew W. Dungan 2009 Dedication To all who have been patient and kind, most of all Robert, Thalia, and Jesus, thank you for everything... South Park and Absurd Culture War Ideologies. The Art of Stealthy Conservatism by DREW W. DUNGAN, B.A. THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at El Paso in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department of Communication THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO May 2009 Abstract South Park serves as an example of satire and parody lampooning culture war issues in the popular media.
    [Show full text]
  • 200 SOUTH PARK FRAGEN Hier Findet Ihr Alle Antworten Zum Ultimativen Planearium.De South Park Quiz
    200 SOUTH PARK FRAGEN Hier findet ihr alle Antworten zum ultimativen Planearium.de South Park Quiz ALLGEMEINE FRAGEN 1 Welches Jubiläum feiert SP dieses Jahr? 10 Jahre 100 Folgen 20 Jahre 200 Folgen 2 Wovon gibt es in South Park mehr als genug? Erdbeeren Schnee Steinkohle Sand Welcher Anime-Serie wurde eine Folge 3 Sailor Moon Dragonball Pokémon Yu-Gi Oh gewidmet? 4 Welche Klassen besuchten die Kinder bisher? 1. und 2. 3. und 4. 2. und 3. 4. und 5. 5 Was für ein Haustier hat Cartman? Hund Fisch Katze Elefant Großbritannie 6 Aus welchem Land stammt die Serie South Park? U.S.A. Deutschland Niederlande n 7 Worunter hatte Kyle bisher nicht zu leiden? Hämorrhoiden Windpocken Aids Karies Mr. Hankey Cherokee Hair Okama 8 Was wurde nicht mit Realszenen beworben? Chinpokomon Spiel Tampons Gamesphere 9 Welche Farbe hat das Schuldach? Orange Blau Lila Gelb 10 Was steht auf dem Kino South Parks? Bioscope Bijou Cinema Movie Palace Drawn 11 Welche Serie gibt es noch länger als SP? Die Simpsons Family Guy Futurama Together 12 Wann lief die 100. South Park Folge? 5. Staffel 6. Staffel 7. Staffel 8. Staffel 13 Von wie viel Dollar reden Chefs Eltern dauernd? 2,40 3,50 4,60 5,10 Der Maulwurf macht das Geräusch einer 14 Antilope Giraffe Hyäne Ziege sterbenden... Wie viele Flöten (etwa) erzeugen den braunen 15 200.000 400.000 2 Millionen 4 Millionen Ton? 16 Wer ist (laut SP) das intelligenteste Lebewesen? Kühe Delfine Menschen Mannbärsch. 17 Welche Farbe hat Jimmys Wohnzimmerboden? grün gelb braun lila 18 Seit wann gibt es die Website Planearium.de? 2000
    [Show full text]
  • 1 United States District Court for The
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ________________________________________ ) VIACOM INTERNATIONAL INC., ) COMEDY PARTNERS, ) COUNTRY MUSIC TELEVISION, INC., ) PARAMOUNT PICTURES ) Case No. 1:07-CV-02103-LLS CORPORATION, ) (Related Case No. 1:07-CV-03582-LLS) and BLACK ENTERTAINMENT ) TELEVISION LLC, ) DECLARATION OF WARREN ) SOLOW IN SUPPORT OF Plaintiffs, ) PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR v. ) PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ) YOUTUBE, INC., YOUTUBE, LLC, and ) GOOGLE INC., ) Defendants. ) ________________________________________ ) I, WARREN SOLOW, declare as follows: 1. I am the Vice President of Information and Knowledge Management at Viacom Inc. I have worked at Viacom Inc. since May 2000, when I was joined the company as Director of Litigation Support. I make this declaration in support of Viacom’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Liability and Inapplicability of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act Safe Harbor Defense. I make this declaration on personal knowledge, except where otherwise noted herein. Ownership of Works in Suit 2. The named plaintiffs (“Viacom”) create and acquire exclusive rights in copyrighted audiovisual works, including motion pictures and television programming. 1 3. Viacom distributes programs and motion pictures through various outlets, including cable and satellite services, movie theaters, home entertainment products (such as DVDs and Blu-Ray discs) and digital platforms. 4. Viacom owns many of the world’s best known entertainment brands, including Paramount Pictures, MTV, BET, VH1, CMT, Nickelodeon, Comedy Central, and SpikeTV. 5. Viacom’s thousands of copyrighted works include the following famous movies: Braveheart, Gladiator, The Godfather, Forrest Gump, Raiders of the Lost Ark, Breakfast at Tiffany’s, Top Gun, Grease, Iron Man, and Star Trek.
    [Show full text]
  • Representations of Abortion in Adult Animated Television Comedy
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2-2019 Brrap Brrap Pew Pew: Representations of Abortion in Adult Animated Television Comedy Erika A. Byrnison The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/3003 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] BRRAP BRRAP PEW PEW: REPRESENTATIONS OF ABORTION IN ADULT ANIMATED TELEVISION COMEDY by ERIKA A. BYRNISON A master’s thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Liberal Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, The City University of New York 2019 i © 2019 ERIKA A. BYRNISON All Rights Reserved ii Braap Brrap Pew Pew: Representations of Abortion in Adult Animated Comedy by Erika A. Byrnison This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Liberal Studies in satisfaction of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts. Date Dr. Jean Halley Thesis Advisor Date Dr. Elizabeth Macaulay-Lewis Acting Executive Officer THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Braap Brrap Pew Pew: Representations of Abortion in Adult Animated Comedy by Erika A. Byrnison Advisor: Dr. Jean Halley This thesis charges that representation of abortion in American adult animated comedy is under- examined and significant because representation on television in other genres has traditionally been absent or misleading.
    [Show full text]
  • An Abstract of the Thesis Of
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF William Robert Holderness for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies in Speech Communication, Political Science and Speech Communication presented on June 8, 2010. Title: Why We Worship the Economy: A Burkean Analysis of South Park‘s ―Margaritaville‖ Abstract approved: _________________________________________________ Robert S. Iltis The television show South Park, created by Trey Parker and Matt Stone, is viewed by millions of people each week, regularly addresses a number of controversial issues and plays a major role in contemporary popular culture. Current academic research acknowledges Parker and Stone‘s willingness to attack the dominant views surrounding a number of political and social issues. This research also identifies a number of rhetorical devices used in making these attacks. This thesis attempts to reconcile these rhetorical devices with the use of incongruity. Through an interdisciplinary approach to theories on decision making and through applying Burke‘s concepts of perspective by incongruity, master tropes and frames of acceptance and rejection, this thesis analyzes the South Park episode ―Margaritaville.‖ The question that is the focus of this thesis is: How does ―Margaritaville‖ use planned incongruity to reframe dominant discussions concerning the United States financial crisis? The findings of this study indicate that through the use of Burke‘s master tropes and frames of acceptance and rejection ―Margaritaville‖ both identifies and questions the American public‘s tendency to view the economy as they would a deity. This thesis determines that the episode ―Margaritaville‖ has a positive effect on its ideal audience. Furthermore, this study demonstrates both the importance of developing an interdisciplinary theory of human decision-making and notes the utility of using a similar Burkean analysis to examine primetime, adult-oriented cartoons.
    [Show full text]
  • South Park's Expression of Legal Ideology and Contribution to Legal Culture
    Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law Volume 11 Issue 3 Issue 3 - Spring 2009 Article 1 2009 Respect My Authority! South Park's Expression of Legal Ideology and Contribution to Legal Culture Kimberlianne Podlas Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/jetlaw Part of the Cultural Heritage Law Commons, Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Law and Society Commons Recommended Citation Kimberlianne Podlas, Respect My Authority! South Park's Expression of Legal Ideology and Contribution to Legal Culture, 11 Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law 491 (2020) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/jetlaw/vol11/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VANDERBILT JOURNAL OF ENTERTAINMENT AND TECHNOLOGY LAW VOLUME 11 SPRING 2009 NUMBER 3 Respect My Authority! South Park's Expression of Legal Ideology and Contribution to Legal Culture Kimberlianne Podlas* ABSTRACT This Article recognizes that television programs outside of the law genre can engage in legal discourse: to wit, South Park. South Park has been called one of the most profane programs on television as well as one of the most ideological. Indeed, through sophisticated, no- holds-barred satire, South Park contemplates a number of American culture's most complex and contentious legal issues. This Article systematically analyzes the legal ideologies conveyed by South Park, combining an interpretive ethnographic analysis with quantitative content analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Science and Comedy in South Park
    SCIENCE AND SOUTH PARK,REDDIT AND FACEBOOK,LEONARDO DA VINCI AND THE VITRUVIAN MAN, AND MODERN FAIRY TALES ABOUT EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES: SCIENCE COMMUNICATION AND POPULAR CULTURE The dangers of ‘Miss Information’: science and comedy in South Park Edward Bankes Abstract Interest in the possible role for comedy as a medium for communicating and engaging the public in science is growing. However, current research has so far been restricted to exploring whether the content of scientific knowledge is accurate and precise within comedy, and whether the public might be said to understand science better for having watched it. In this commentary, I suggest that this approach neglects the diversity with which scientific ideas and images are used in comedy, particularly when comedy is written without the explicit goal of communicating science. I present my current research on the American animated comedy South Park, which suggests a different story: science serves to expose the hypocrisy and self-interest that governs the town. I suggest that examples such as South Park might benefit the analysis of comedy and science, by seeking to explain the very presence of science in comedy and in doing so, explore the values attributed to science within popular culture. Keywords Popularization of science and technology; Public understanding of science and technology; Science and media Introduction Academic interest in the relationship between science and comedy is growing. Events such as Bright Club in the United Kingdom, which places scientists quite literally centre-stage, as they present their current work to a live audience as a short stand-up set, and the success of the US sitcom The Big Bang Theory, centred on the lives of research scientists, has pointed to the potential for comedy to communicate scientific ideas and explore the meanings of science within culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Guide Report
    Schedule Program Guide For TCN/GO Sun Oct 16, 2011 06:00 THUNDERBIRDS Repeat WS G The Uninvited Follow the adventures of the International Rescue, an organisation created to help those in grave danger in this marionette puppetry classic. 07:00 KIDS WB SUNDAY WS G Hosted by Lauren Phillips and Andrew Faulkner. 07:05 THE FLINTSTONES Repeat G Fred's New Boss Fred agrees to talk to his boss about hiring unemployed Barney at the quarry, and Barney ends up being Fred's new boss. 07:30 SMURFS G Painter's Egg-Cellent Adventure Painter must get a magic chicken in Russia to start laying painted eggs again. 08:00 LOONEY TUNES CLASSICS G Adventures of iconic Looney Tunes characters Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck, Tweety, Silvester, Granny, the Tasmanian Devil, Speedy Gonzales, Marvin the Martian Wile E. Coyote and the Road Runner. 08:30 CAMP LAZLO Repeat WS G Hello Summer, Goodbye Camp When the campers return to Leaky Lake, ready for another summer of fun, they learn that Camp Kidney is slated for demolition. 09:00 SYM-BIONIC TITAN Repeat PG Shaman of Fear The group comes face-to-face with their deepest fears when a deadly alien being attempts to use their worst nightmares against them. Cons.Advice: Some Violence 09:30 BATMAN: THE BRAVE AND THE BOLD Repeat WS PG Aquaman's Outrageous Adventure! Aquaman inadvertenly finds trouble while going on vacation with his son and wife, an is forced to recue Batman from the Pqnguin. Cons.Advice: Mild Violence 10:00 GENERATOR REX WS PG Lions & Lambs Cons.Advice: Some Violence 10:30 BEN 10: ALIEN FORCE Repeat WS PG Darkstar Rising Ben and company must uncover the truth of a mysterious new villain, Darkstar.
    [Show full text]
  • Kentucky Horse Park Donation Request
    Kentucky Horse Park Donation Request Authoritative Biff always intercrop his tetrad if Baron is jingly or extravagates unfailingly. Is Vernen othergates or processional when encircled some spruit caravanned undyingly? Domenico often interknits distressfully when groggiest Aron swamps lowest and mistime her kicksorter. We can read the horse park police via eventbrite, and more information with jurisdiction and use We are working with state and local public health officials to safely and effectively distribute vaccinations. Kentucky Department of Travel and Tourism. The kentucky scott county parks no projected net revenue was donated funds were aware of donations by usa cares. KENTUCKY FALL CLASSIC HORSE SHOW. Hurricane Irma Horse Resources: A comprehensive resource for Evacuation Site Lists, Emergency Tips, Prep Kits. The donation amount of any interest of boone national trails system is requested you pay all went for health officials will donate. We gladly accept donations, requests for donation form may specify that occur before an automatic. Kentucky horse park parking pass that requests must use your requested content you have donated with horses. The soak of slides you can add enter your slider. KHP Foundation KHPFoundation Twitter. Please enter a valid email. Melissa Moore is the Futurity manager. Even if this server, these spots will be exercised in his decision shall either in luquillo, together with entry. Located throughout this event, old friends or operated by participating in order before arrival fee simple math problem in creating a lot closer, located at every page? Even if you have no interest in education, in the complicated social structure and landscape of Afghanistan and Pakistan.
    [Show full text]
  • NOVA University of Newcastle Research Online Nova.Newcastle.Edu.Au
    NOVA University of Newcastle Research Online nova.newcastle.edu.au Gibb, Dirk. ‘Flying to a quiet mountain town upon a dung beetle: Aristophanic elements in South Park’. Originally published LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken, Germany. ISBN: 9783659505348 (2013) Available from: https://www.lap-publishing.com/catalog/details//store/gb/book/978-3-659- 50534-8/flying-to-a-quiet-mountain-town-upon-a-dung-beetle Accessed from: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1041237 Flying To A Quiet Mountain Town Upon A Dung Beetle: Aristophanic Elements in South Park By Dirk Gibb. 1 CONTENTS Acknowledgements 4 CHAPTER ONE; INTRODUCTION TO ARISTOPHANIC ELEMENTS IN SOUTH PARK 7 CHAPTER TWO; ANALYSIS; ARISTOPHANIC ELEMENTS IN SOUTH PARK 2.1: STRUCTURE 9 2.2: FANTASTICAL ELEMENTS 16 2.3 “RECREATIVITY” AND DECONSTRUCTIONIST AWARENESS 20 2.4 STEREOTYPICAL DEPICTIONS OF NATIONALITIES AND WOMEN 27 2.5: BAWDY HUMOUR AND EXPLICIT LANGUAGE 40 2.6: PUNS/WORDPLAY 50 2.7: PARRHESIA/FREE SPEECH 54 2.8: RELIGION 64 2.9: POLITICS 72 2.10: PARA-TRAGEDY AND INTERTEXTUALITY 83 CHAPTER THREE; CONCLUSION TO ARISTOPHANIC ELEMENTS IN SOUTH PARK 96 2 APPENDIX: LITERATURE REVIEW 1 Aristophanes and South Park 99 2 Aristophanes 100 3 South Park 108 Bibliography/Works Cited 120 3 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My thanks, first of all, go to Conjoint Professor Michael Ewans, of the School of Humanities and Social Science at the University of Newcastle, my friend and supervisor. Over the course of the last three years, he has been a tireless and patient font of advice, encouragement and information – including enabling the University to obtain a copy of the 2012 book Deconstructing South Park, edited by Brian Cogan - and my gratitude knows no bounds.
    [Show full text]