The Validity of the Transformational, Transactional, and Laissez-Faire
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Walden University ScholarWorks Frank Dilley Award for Outstanding Doctoral Study University Awards 2001 The validity of the transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership model as measured by the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ 5X) John Antonakis Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dilley This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the University Awards at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Frank Dilley Award for Outstanding Doctoral Study by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE VALIDITY OF THE TRANSFORMATIONAL, TRANSACTIONAL, AND LAISSEZ-FAIRE LEADERSHIP MODEL AS MEASURED BY THE MULTIFACTOR LEADERSHIP QUESTIONNAIRE (MLQ 5X) by John Antonakis Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Applied Management and Decision Sciences Walden University February 2001 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 3000380 Copyright 2001 by Antonakis, John All rights reserved. __ _® UMI UMI Microform 3000380 Copyright 2001 by Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DISSERTATION OF JOHN ANTONAKIS APPROVED: Om a x (2L. CAROLE A. BEERE VICE PRESIDENT FOR ACADEMIC AFFAIRS WALDEN UNIVERSITY 2001 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Walden University APPLIED MANAGEMENT AND DECISION SCIENCES This is to certify that I have examined the doctoral dissertation by John Antonakis and have found that it is complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Dr. William Steeves, Committee Chair Applied Management and Decision Sciences Faculty ignature * Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Walden University APPLIED MANAGEMENT AND DECISION SCIENCES This is to certify that I have examined the doctoral dissertation by John Antonakis and have found that it is complete and satisfactory in all respects. Dr. Mindy Machanic, Committee Member Professional Pscyhology Faculty iture WaWo / Date/ Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Walden University APPLIED MANAGEMENT AND DECISION SCIENCES This is to certify that I have examined the doctoral dissertation by John Antonakis and have found that it is complete and satisfactory in all respects. Dr. Gary Gemmill, Committee Member Applied Management and Decision Sciences Faculty / — U - 2 - 0 0 / Date Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Walden University APPLIED MANAGEMENT AND DECISION SCIENCES This is to certify that I have examined the doctoral dissertation by John Antonakis and have found that it is complete and satisfactory in all respects. Dr. David Stein, Faculty Representative Health Services Faculty Signature Date Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Walden University APPLIED MANAGEMENT AND DECISION SCIENCES This is to certify that I have examined the doctoral dissertation by John Antonakis and have found that it is complete and satisfactory in all respects. Dr. Bruce Avolio, Faculty Representative External Faculty Member Signature / / / /j-o 0 / Date Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT THE VALIDITY OF THE TRANSFORMATIONAL, TRANSACTIONAL, AND LAISSEZ-FAIRE LEADERSHIP MODEL AS MEASURED BY THE MULTIFACTOR LEADERSHIP QUESTIONNAIRE (MLQ 5X) by John Antonakis Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Applied Management and Decision Sciences Walden University February 2001 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ), the most frequently used instrument for gauging Bass and Avolio’s full-range leadership model, underwent numerous revisions to answer criticisms about its construct validity. Because researchers found conflicting results regarding the number of factors that best constitute the model, this study examined whether the factor structure of the MLQ (5X) was consistent across a diverse array of samples. The total size of the samples was 6,525, integrated from 18 independent studies. Using confirmatory structural equation modeling techniques, results indicated that the factor structure was best represented by nine single-order factors, as asserted by Bass and Avolio. These results were prevalent when all samples were integrated for the factor structure invariance test, or when individual samples were grouped into homogenous units for strict factorial or factor structure invariance. Thus, the validity of the model was a function of sample conditions explaining why independent researchers who used nonhomogenous samples failed to confirm the nine-factor model. These conditions—interpretable as moderators that bounded the theoretical model— included various environmental and organizational settings, leader gender, and the hierarchical level of the leader. The criterion validity of the MLQ was also tested, but results should be viewed cautiously as the leadership and outcome measures were each collected from the same source. Nonetheless, the regression paths of the MLQ factors were interpretable, and followed theoretical propositions. Transformational and contingent reward leadership was positively related to performance, and passive-avoidant leadership negatively related. Management-by-exception active varied according to sample conditions. These findings suggest that a standard set of leadership behaviors is Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. not universally related to effectiveness, and that leaders operationalize their behaviors differently depending on contextual factors. As a consequence, the interfactor relationships of the MLQ, and the relationships of the factors to criterion measures may be a function of the conditions under which the model is examined. Therefore, testing the MLQ’s validity—and indeed that of other leadership instruments—should be performed under homogenous sample conditions. Finally, this dissertation suggests that the MLQ should be retained for future research and training. Possible improvements to the theory and measurement model are also discussed. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. DEDICATION To Athena, Saskia, and our precious baby you are carrying—thank you for making each day beautiful and for providing meaning for my existence. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Finishing a Ph.D. is a long and grueling road that few try, and even fewer accomplish. Being who 1 am, I tried to make my life as difficult as possible. At times I felt that I was never going to make it. My journey, however, was made less treacherous and more fun by many people who were sources of hope and inspiration. The most important person for me in this journey was my partner Saskia, who was a continuous source of intellectual strength and wisdom. She has helped build my confidence to pursue my goals. Saskia, if I made it, you can, too, a hundred times over. Get your map out and