Romeo and Juliet

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Romeo and Juliet The English Renaissance in Context: King Lear Introduction Here you will find three versions of the story of King Lear and his daughter Cordelia: one from a sixteenth-century history book, Holinshed's Chronicles, and two in plays written by William Shakespeare and Nahum Tate. By comparing these three versions you can see some of the differences in storytelling caused by the difference between history and theater, as well as between theatrical conventions of plays written at separate times, for audiences with different tastes and expectations. Writing history is very different from writing a play. ? What are some of the different demands put on an historian as opposed to a playwright? ? For example, what kind of "truth" is each expected to tell? ? What is each allowed to, or required to, leave out, or to add? University of Pennsylvania Libraries - 1 - Furness Shakespeare Collection The English Renaissance in Context: King Lear To begin: let's explore the history text that Shakespeare might have consulted. This text and image comes from the 1577 edition of the book called The Chronicles of England, Scotland and Ireland. When it was first published, this text was the most impressive British history England had ever seen. While the book is often referred to as "Holinshed's Chronicles," Raphael Holinshed was not its sole author. An English printer, R. Wolfe, started the project and employed Holinshed to organize the compilation of the history (after Wolfe's death, another set of printers took over the financing of the chronicles). Holinshed wrote the histories of England and Scotland, William Harrison supplied a description of England and Scotland, and Richard Stanyhurst supplied a description of Ireland. The text provided a geographical description of each region, and an account of its past, traced back to pre-historical and legendary origins and continuing up through the sixteenth century. The Chronicles' sources are multiple, including old and contemporary histories, eye-witness accounts, documents, and anecdotes. Each history is organized as a sequence of monarchs, including the name of the king or queen and the year of his or her reign. University of Pennsylvania Libraries - 2 - Furness Shakespeare Collection The English Renaissance in Context: King Lear A second edition of the Chronicles appeared in 1587 after Holinshed's death in 1580. This text was greatly enlarged and augmented by several contributors, including John Hooker (Vowell), Abraham Fleming, Francis Boteville, and John Stow, while the woodcut illustrations were eliminated. Shakespeare used this 1587 edition for source material for many of his plays, including the history plays, Macbeth, and King Lear. Aside from the elimination of the woodcuts, the new compilers added and deleted texts and marginal comments; the moralistic comments and marginal Latin tags added by Abraham Fleming, in particular, reveal a later contributor's effort to moralize British history. In addition to the complete 1587 edition of the Chronicles, available from the Furness English Renaissance Digital Library, the English Renaissance in Context project includes selected scans of the 1577 edition for two reasons: first, because it is held in the University of Pennsylvania's Furness Collection, and second, because it contains the woodcut illustrations. The Chronicles has traditionally interested scholars because of the Shakespeare connection, but it is also a fascinating record of complex historical consciousness in sixteenth-century England. University of Pennsylvania Libraries - 3 - Furness Shakespeare Collection The English Renaissance in Context: King Lear General Questions about History and Performance: The stories in Holinshed's Chronicles were created in written form from the very start. Unlike Holinshed's Chronicles, Shakespeare's plays were first presented in live performances. If Shakespeare did create his stories in written form first, those stories were likely to be changed in the rehearsal process as actors decided which lines worked and which didn't. Only later were versions of those performances turned into printed books. The versions of the plays that we have are probably different from what Shakespeare originally wrote and also, to some extent, different from what happened in performance. Think about the following questions: ? What is the difference between seeing a story enacted in front of you (like Shakespeare chose to do) and reading the same story in a book (like Holinshed did)? How do you respond differently? Which senses do you use? ? What kind of person would prefer to see a story performed live? What kind of person would prefer to read it? What kinds of people do you think Holinshed was writing for? What kinds of people do you think Shakespeare was writing for? ? What is the difference between attending a performance of a Shakespeare play and reading the play in book form? To what extent can we accurately imagine what happened in performance based on the book that was published afterwards? University of Pennsylvania Libraries - 4 - Furness Shakespeare Collection The English Renaissance in Context: King Lear King Lear Shakespeare's story of King Lear and his daughters is different in many ways from the account he found in Holinshed's Chronicles. ? What differences do you find most interesting? ? Which ones seem necessitated by the fact that he was adapting a two- page narrative for performance in a five-act play? ? Which ones put a new spin on the story? Shakespeare used more sources than Holinshed for this story, which is more a legend than it is history. Geoffrey of Monmouth included this story in his list of legendary kings in his Historia Regnum Britanniae (c.1136). Other Tudor versions are included in The Mirror for Magistrates (1574) and William Warner's Albion's England (1586). In all these versions, the dimensions of the story are the same, although the names of the characters and details of the story differ. Shakespeare knew a play called The True Chronicle History of King Leir (first published in 1605), which, like the chronicle versions of the Lear story, ends happily with Cordelia alive and Lear restored to the throne. Shakespeare would have used the 1587 version of Holinshed as a source for his play. We also include here, however, woodcuts from the earlier version of 1577. University of Pennsylvania Libraries - 5 - Furness Shakespeare Collection The English Renaissance in Context: King Lear The two significant differences between the 1577 and 1587 version in this section include: the elimination of the woodcuts; and the titling of the section on Cordelia's reign the "gynarchy of Cordelia." When thinking about the differences between Shakespeare's version of King Lear and the account in Holinshed, you might ask yourself some of the following questions: ? The Chronicles say nothing of any madness in Lear: what difference does it make that Shakespeare's Lear goes mad? ? How does the Chronicles' characterization of Cordelia compare with Shakespeare's? ? Shakespeare deliberately altered all his sources to make Lear and Cordelia die at the end of the play --causing generations of critics to ask: why? What do you think? One can also focus in more detail on the differences between the account of the opening scene and the three sisters' speeches in Holinshed and King Lear. ? How does Shakespeare introduce and structure this scene differently? ? How does he add characterization of the daughters through their speeches? ? Why does he significantly change Cordelia's speech? Another way of thinking about the difference between Shakespeare and Holinshed is to think about the image of Cordelia in the woodcut illustration of Holinshed's Chronicles of 1577. When talking about images in Holinshed, one should always keep in mind the fact that the woodcuts were often reused, and therefore one must be careful in deriving any conclusion from any specific image. In illustrations for the Lear section of Holinshed , for instance, the image of the portrait of Cordelia appears to be unique, while the suicide of Cordelia is used in a few other contexts and the image of Lear is generic. University of Pennsylvania Libraries - 6 - Furness Shakespeare Collection The English Renaissance in Context: King Lear Questions to consider: ? What significant similarities and differences do you see between the images of Lear and Cordelia? ? How did the printer choose to portray Cordelia (e.g, her muscular forearms, her scepter, her breasts)? ? Cordelia is portrayed differently in the head portrait and the suicide scene: what alternative "Cordelias" are we given? ? Why would she be shown committing suicide on a bed? ? How do the images in Holinshed compare with18th- and 19th-century portrayals: Susanna Cibber, Eliza Logan and Clara Rousby. University of Pennsylvania Libraries - 7 - Furness Shakespeare Collection The English Renaissance in Context: King Lear Nahum Tate Shakespeare certainly did not have the last word on the Lear and Cordelia story. When Shakespeare's plays were revived in the theater at the end of the seventeenth century, playwrights adapted his stories to suit new standards and tastes of theatrical form and style (as well as a new political climate). One of the most famous -- or notorious -- of these rewritings is Nahum Tate's adaptation of the story of King Kear and his daughter Cordelia. Nahum Tate was born in Dublin, Ireland in 1652, and died in London in 1715. He was a well-known poet of his time, and was named poet laureate of England. Today he is remembered in English literary
Recommended publications
  • Shakespearean Tragedy's
    SHAKESPEAREAN TRAGEDY’S SHAKESPEAREAN TRAGEDY’S: A CRITICAL STUDY Rameshsingh M.Chauhan Assistant Professor, ISSN 2277-7733 Sardar Vallabhbhai Vanijya Mahavidyalaya, Ahmedabad Volume 6 Issue 4, March 2018 Abstract Shakespearean say that tragedy is nothing but a sad play is not accurate the plays often involve the fall of noble stature. The character always has a fatal that leads to their downfall. Their downfall is usually set into motion by external forces that the characters have little or no control over. The tragedies are also characterized by a great deal of death. The tone is usually very somber from the onset of the play. The plays are meant to examine human nature. The elements below can be found in Shakespeare tragedies, how well do they match the play know? They end with the death of the tragic heroes. The deaths of the heroes have a big impact on the people around them. And the larger community other person dies as part of the tragic chain of events. The heroes reach a pack in the day of happiness or achievement. Macbeth becomes King Romeo and Juliet get married. This usually happens about through. After this peak, there is a peripateia where events take a terrible turn for the worse. The heroes are in some part responsible for this change of fortunes. The paper critically analyses the Shakespearean tragedy. Key words: criticism, critical study, shakespeare, tragedy William Shakespeare is the greatest English writer. He was born on April 23, 1564 in Stratford upon even Shakespeare was the most documented Elizabethan play write.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources of Lear
    Meddling with Masterpieces: the On-going Adaptation of King Lear by Lynne Bradley B.A., Queen’s University 1997 M.A., Queen’s University 1998 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of English © Lynne Bradley, 2008 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photo-copying or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Meddling with Masterpieces: the On-going Adaptation of King Lear by Lynne Bradley B.A., Queen’s University 1997 M.A., Queen’s University 1998 Supervisory Committee Dr. Sheila M. Rabillard, Supervisor (Department of English) Dr. Janelle Jenstad, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Michael Best, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Annalee Lepp, Outside Member (Department of Women’s Studies) iii Supervisory Committee Dr. Sheila M. Rabillard, Supervisor (Department of English) Dr. Janelle Jenstad, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Michael Best, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Annalee Lepp, Outside Member (Department of Women’s Studies) Abstract The temptation to meddle with Shakespeare has proven irresistible to playwrights since the Restoration and has inspired some of the most reviled and most respected works of theatre. Nahum Tate’s tragic-comic King Lear (1681) was described as an execrable piece of dementation, but played on London stages for one hundred and fifty years. David Garrick was equally tempted to adapt King Lear in the eighteenth century, as were the burlesque playwrights of the nineteenth. In the twentieth century, the meddling continued with works like King Lear’s Wife (1913) by Gordon Bottomley and Dead Letters (1910) by Maurice Baring.
    [Show full text]
  • Queen Anne and the Arts
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by MURAL - Maynooth University Research Archive Library TRANSITS Queen Anne and the Arts EDITED BY CEDRIC D. REVERAND II LEWISBURG BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY PRESS 14_461_Reverand.indb 5 9/22/14 11:19 AM Published by Bucknell University Press Copublished by The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc. 4501 Forbes Boulevard, Suite 200, Lanham, Maryland 20706 www.rowman.com Unit A, Whitacre Mews, 26-34 Stannery Street, London SE11 4AB All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without written permission from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote passages in a review. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Information Available Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data <insert CIP data> ™ The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992. Printed in the United States of America 14_461_Reverand.indb 6 9/22/14 11:19 AM CONTENTS List of Illustrations ix Acknowledgments xiii Introduction 1 1 “Praise the Patroness of Arts” 7 James A. Winn 2 “She Will Not Be That Tyrant They Desire”: Daniel Defoe and Queen Anne 35 Nicholas Seager 3 Queen Anne, Patron of Poets? 51 Juan Christian Pellicer 4 The Moral in the Material: Numismatics and Identity in Evelyn, Addison, and Pope 59 Barbara M. Benedict 5 Mild Mockery: Queen Anne’s Era and the Cacophony of Calm 79 Kevin L.
    [Show full text]
  • Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare Abridged for The
    Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare Abridged for the Shakespeare Schools Festival by Martin Lamb & Penelope Middelboe 30 MINUTE VERSION © Shakespeare Schools Festival (SSF) “We are such stuff as dreams are made on.” Copyright of the abridged scripts rest with Shakespeare Schools Festival charity. Your registration fee only allows you to perform the abridgement during the current Festival. You may not share the script with other schools, or download all the scripts for personal use. A public performance of the SSF abridged script must be premiered at the professional SSF theatre. 1 LIST OF ROLES Prince Escalus PRINCE OF VERONA Paris A YOUNG COUNT Montague HEAD OF THE HOUSE OF MONTAGUE Capulet HEAD OF THE HOUSE OF CAPULET Romeo MONTAGUE’S SON Mercutio KINSMAN TO THE PRINCE, FRIEND TO ROMEO Benvolio NEPHEW TO MONTAGUE, FRIEND TO ROMEO Tybalt NEPHEW TO LADY CAPULET Juliet DAUGHTER TO CAPULET Nurse to Juliet Lady Montague WIFE TO MONTAGUE Lady Capulet WIFE TO CAPULET Friar Lawrence OF THE FRANCISCAN ORDER, FRIEND TO ROMEO Friar John OF THE FRANCISCAN ORDER Balthazar SERVANT TO ROMEO Sampson SERVANTS TO CAPULET & Gregory Abraham SERVANT TO MONTAGUE An Apothecary Citizens, Revellers And Others 2 PROLOGUE CHORUS Two households both alike in dignity, In fair Verona where we lay our scene From ancient grudge, break to new mutiny, Where civil blood makes civil hands unclean: From forth the fatal loins of these two foes, A pair of star crossed lovers take their life: Whose misadventured piteous overthrows, Doth with their death bury their parents’ strife. SCENE 1 A street ENTER SAMPSON and GREGORY of the house of Capulet, in conversation.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Notes
    Background Notes William Shakespeare and Romeo and Juliet Shakespeare: A brief biography • Shakespeare was born on April 23, 1564 in Stratford-on-Avon, England to an upper/ middle class family. Shakespeare: A brief biography • He learned Latin and Greek history in his grammar school as a child. This would explain the Latin and Greek references in his works. • There is not evidence that Shakespeare continued his schooling after elementary school. Shakespeare: A Brief Biography In 1582 at the age of 18, he married Anne Hathaway who was 26. She was pregnant before they were married. Shakespeare: A Brief Biography • After a few years of marriage, Shakespeare left Stratford-on-Avon and his family for London to pursue his career in acting and writing. Shakespeare: A Brief Biography • Shakespeare wrote and acted with The Lord Chamberlain’s Men. This was an acting troupe that would perform during Shakespeare’s time. Shakespeare: A Brief Biography • It is believed that Shakespeare died on April 23, 1616. • In his will, Shakespeare left his daughters the majority of his wealth and possessions. He left his wife his “second best bed”. Shakespeare: A Brief Biography • The inscription on his tomb states: "Good friend for Jesus sake forbeare, To dig the dust enclosed here. Blessed be the man that spares these stones, And cursed be he that moves my bones.” Shakespeare wrote this because in his time, old bodies were dug up and burned to make room for new burials. Shakespeare despised this treatment of bodies, so he wrote this. Romeo and Juliet and Elizabethan Theater • Shakespeare did not create the story of Romeo and Juliet.
    [Show full text]
  • William Shakespeare - Poems
    Classic Poetry Series William Shakespeare - poems - Publication Date: 2012 Publisher: Poemhunter.com - The World's Poetry Archive William Shakespeare(26 April 1564 - 23 April 1616) an English poet and playwright, widely regarded as the greatest writer in the English language and the world's pre-eminent dramatist. He is often called England's national poet and the "Bard of Avon". His surviving works, including some collaborations, consist of about 38 plays, 154 sonnets, two long narrative poems, and several other poems. His plays have been translated into every major living language and are performed more often than those of any other playwright. Shakespeare was born and raised in Stratford-upon-Avon. At the age of 18, he married Anne Hathaway, with whom he had three children: Susanna, and twins Hamnet and Judith. Between 1585 and 1592, he began a successful career in London as an actor, writer, and part owner of a playing company called the Lord Chamberlain's Men, later known as the King's Men. He appears to have retired to Stratford around 1613 at age 49, where he died three years later. Few records of Shakespeare's private life survive, and there has been considerable speculation about such matters as his physical appearance, sexuality, religious beliefs, and whether the works attributed to him were written by others. Shakespeare produced most of his known work between 1589 and 1613. His early plays were mainly comedies and histories, genres he raised to the peak of sophistication and artistry by the end of the 16th century. He then wrote mainly tragedies until about 1608, including Hamlet, King Lear, Othello, and Macbeth, considered some of the finest works in the English language.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamlet, Prince of Denmark
    Hamlet, Prince of Denmark William Shakespeare [Collins edition] 2 ABOUT THIS E-TEXT Project Gutenberg Etext of Hamlet by Shakespeare PG has multiple editions of William Shakespeare’s Complete Works Copyright laws are changing all over the world, be sure to check the copyright laws for your country before posting these files!! Please take a look at the important information in this header. We encourage you to keep this file on your own disk, keeping an electronic path open for the next readers. Do not remove this. It must legally be the first thing seem when opening the book. In fact, our legal advisors said we can’t even change margins. Welcome To The World of Free Plain Vanilla Electronic Texts Etexts Readable By Both Humans and By Computers, Since 1971 These Etexts Prepared By Hundreds of Volunteers and Donations Information on contacting Project Gutenberg to get Etexts, and further information is included below. We need your donations. This etext was prepared by Dianne Bean. Converted to TEX, pdf and ps by Carlos Campani, [email protected]. 3 Project Gutenberg Etexts are usually created from multiple editions, all of which are in the Public Domain in the United States, unless a copyright notice is included. Therefore, we usually do NOT keep any of these books in compliance with any particular paper edition. We are now trying to release all our books one month in advance of the official release dates, leaving time for better editing. Please note: neither this list nor its contents are final till midnight of the last day of the month of any such announcement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Characterisation in Shakespearean Comedies
    CHARACTERIZATION IN SHAKESPEAREAN COMEDIES & ITS APPLICATION Curso monográfico Literatura Inglesa “Shakespeare in Performance” Academic Year 2006/2007 By PLANNING TEAM PLANNING TEAM MEMBERS ARE: • Ayala Ruíz, ALBERTO • Ayanoglu, AYSE • Bordas del Prado, ANA ISABEL • Cabrales Morant, RAQUEL • Cantero Laserna, EDUARDO • Carbonell Rico, ALFREDO • Clares Arrimada, ÓSCAR • Onur, IPEK INDEX 0. INTRODUCTION 1. SHAKESPEAREAN COMEDY 1.1 Defining the terms “comedy” and “humour”. 1.2 Comedy conventions. 1.3 Features of the Shakespearean comedy. 1.4 Application. 2. STEREOTYPES IN SHAKESPEAREAN COMEDY 2.1 Stock characters. 2.2 Application. 3. CHARACTERIZATION 3.1 Costumes in Shakespearean plays. 3.1.1 Elizabethan clothing. 3.1.2 Men and women dress in Shakespearean plays. 3.1.2.1 Men’s garments. 3.1.2.2 Women’s garments. 3.1.3 Decoration / Materials. 3.2 Hairstyle and make-up in Shakespearean times and comedies. 3.2.1 Hairstyle in Shakespearean times and comic characters. 3.2.1.1 Men’s hairstyle. 3.2.1.2 Women’s hairstyle. 3.2.2 The importance of make-up in theatre. 3.3 Voice in Shakespearean comedies. 3.3.1 Importance of voice in Shakespearean comedies. 3.3.2 Voice and gender. 3.3.3 Talking to the audience. 3.4 Application. 4. CONCLUSION 5. REFERENCES 6. NOTES ON THE ORAL PRESENTATION 0 – INTRODUCTION The purpose of developing this paper is to witness different aspects of Shakespearean comedies. This paper is divided into three main parts: 1) Shakespearean Comedy (general definition, conventions and characteristics), 2) Stereotypes in Shakespearean comedies, and 3) Characterization (costumes, hairstyle, make-up and voices).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 on King Lear and the “Avoidance of Love” Alan Baily Stephen F. Austin State University I. the World and the Stage the Worl
    On King Lear and the “Avoidance of Love” Alan Baily Stephen F. Austin State University I. The World and the Stage The Worldly Poet Shakespeare is our most worldly poet. This much seems to be a point of convergence among critics. But what does this mean? For Thomas Carlyle it meant that Shakespeare’s poetry was “broad” rather than “deep”. Shakespeare was a poet of the world, rather than a world. By contrast, Dante exemplified a “deep” poet. The final referent of Dante’s poetry was not the world but eternity, and his world vision was distinctly that of the medieval epoch. Dante’s greatness was to refined this vision to the point of perfection. For Carlyle, this was partially a result of Dante’s political misfortune, which occasioned in his earthly homelessness. “The earthly world had cast [Dante] forth, to wander, wander; no living heart to love him now; for his sore miseries there was no solace here.” The deeper naturally would the Eternal World impress itself on him; that awful reality over which, after all, this Time-world, with its Florences and banishments, only flutters as an unreal shadow. Florence thou shalt never see: but Hell and Purgatory and Heaven thou shalt surely see! What is Florence, Can della Scala, and the World and Life altogether? ETERNITY: thither, of a truth, not elsewhither, art thou and all things bound! The great soul of Dante, homeless on earth, made its home more and more in that awful other world. Carlyle describes the “depth” of Dante’s vision by reference to the poet’s psychological “intensity.” To the modern eye, Dante’s seems “a narrow, and even sectarian mind: it is partly the fruit of his age and position, but partly too of his own nature.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of King Lear [1681]: Lear As Inscriptive Site John Rempel
    Document generated on 09/29/2021 12:39 a.m. Lumen Selected Proceedings from the Canadian Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies Travaux choisis de la Société canadienne d'étude du dix-huitième siècle Nahum Tate's ('aberrant/ 'appalling') The History of King Lear [1681]: Lear as Inscriptive Site John Rempel Theatre of the world Théâtre du monde Volume 17, 1998 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1012380ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1012380ar See table of contents Publisher(s) Canadian Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies / Société canadienne d'étude du dix-huitième siècle ISSN 1209-3696 (print) 1927-8284 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Rempel, J. (1998). Nahum Tate's ('aberrant/ 'appalling') The History of King Lear [1681]: Lear as Inscriptive Site. Lumen, 17, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.7202/1012380ar Copyright © Canadian Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies / Société This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit canadienne d'étude du dix-huitième siècle, 1998 (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ 3. Nahum Tate's ('aberrant/ 'appalling') The History of King Lear [1681]: Lear as Inscriptive Site From Addison in 1711 ('as it is reformed according to the chimerical notion of poetical justice, in my humble opinion it has lost half its beauty') to Michael Dobson in 1992 (Shakespeare 'serves for Tate ..
    [Show full text]
  • Tennyson's Poems
    Tennyson’s Poems New Textual Parallels R. H. WINNICK To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/944 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. TENNYSON’S POEMS: NEW TEXTUAL PARALLELS Tennyson’s Poems: New Textual Parallels R. H. Winnick https://www.openbookpublishers.com Copyright © 2019 by R. H. Winnick This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work; to adapt the work and to make commercial use of the work provided that attribution is made to the author (but not in any way which suggests that the author endorses you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: R. H. Winnick, Tennyson’s Poems: New Textual Parallels. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2019. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0161 In order to access detailed and updated information on the license, please visit https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/944#copyright Further details about CC BY licenses are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Digital material and resources associated with this volume are available at https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/944#resources Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omission or error will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 King Lear, the Taming of the Shrew, a Midsummer Night's Dream, and Cymbeline, Presented by the Oregon Shakespeare Festival, Fe
    King Lear, The Taming of the Shrew, A Midsummer Night's Dream, and Cymbeline, presented by the Oregon Shakespeare Festival, February-November 2013. Geoff Ridden Southern Oregon University [email protected] King Lear. Director: Bill Rauch. With Jack Willis/Michael Winters (King Lear), Daisuke Tsuji (Fool), Sofia Jean Gomez (Cordelia), and Armando Durán (Kent). The Taming of the Shrew. Director: David Ivers. With Ted Deasy (Petruchio), Neil Geisslinger (Kate), John Tufts (Tranio), and Wayne T. Carr (Lucentio). Cymbeline. Director: Bill Rauch. With Daniel José Molina (Posthumus), Dawn-Lyen Gardner (Imogen), and Kenajuan Bentley (Iachimo). A Midsummer Night's Dream. Director: Christopher Liam Moore. With Gina Daniels (Puck), and Brent Hinkley (Bottom). This was the 78th season of the Oregon Shakespeare Festival, and four of its eleven productions were Shakespeare plays: two were staged indoors (King Lear and The Taming of the Shrew) and two outdoors on the Elizabethan Stage/Allen Pavilion. This was the first season in which plays were performed indoors across the full season, and so both The Taming of the Shrew and King Lear had large numbers of performances. Nevertheless, according to the Mail Tribune, the non-Shakespeare plays drew larger audiences than Shakespeare this season: the plays staged outdoors fared especially poorly, and this is explained in part by the fact that four outdoor performances had to be cancelled because of 1 smoke in the valley, resulting in a loss of ticket income of around $200,000.1 King Lear King Lear was staged in the Thomas Theatre (previously the New Theatre), the smallest of the OSF theatres, and ran from February to November.
    [Show full text]