INDIA: THIRD TAMIL NADU URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

Traffic and Transportation Schemes

RESETTLEMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

for Ariyalur Vilangadupakkam Road

(Km 0/0- Km 6/4)

HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT & CHENNAI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Government of Tamil Nadu

July 2007

Contents

Executive Summary ...... 4

CHAPTER 1 ...... 6

Background ...... 6

Resettlement Policy Framework ...... 6

Land acquisition and R&R measures ...... 7

Resettlement Implementation Plan ...... 8

Description of the sub-Project ...... 8

Minimising Resettlement ...... 11

CHAPTER 2 ...... 14

Socio Economic Characteristics of PAPs ...... 14

Perceived benefits of the project ...... 16

Key socio-economic indicators ...... 16

Consultation and participation process ...... 17

Public Consultation ...... 20

CHAPTER 3 ...... 23

Implementation Mechanism ...... 23

Project Level RAP...... 23

Project Implementation Unit ...... 23

Implementation ...... 23

Steps in Implementation ...... 23

Costs and Budget ...... 24

Grievance Redressal Committee / Mechanism: ...... 26

Monitoring and Evaluation ...... 26

2

Annexure

Annexure 1 : Baseline Socio Economic Survey ...... 28

Annexure 2 : Compensation for the land affected ...... 33

Annexure 3 : Budget Estimate for R & R ...... 36

Annexure 4 : Land Acquisition Schedule ...... 38

Annexure 5 : Public Consultation ...... 46

Public Consultation - Attendance sheet ...... 47

Annexure 6 : Monitoring Indicator Format ...... 48

Annexure 7 : RIP Implementation Schedule - Gantt Chart ...... 53

Appendix

Appendix I : Entitlement Matrix: ...... 54

3

Executive Summary

The magnitude of land acquisition and resettlement in this project include- private land acquisition of 0.63 hectares belonging to 25 Land owners and transfer of 0.77 hectares of government land and resettlement impacts include 13 temporary structures and loss of livelihood to 6 families. Also includes minor impacts to 3 families who require only payment of cash assistance for loss of their minor assets a) Government of Tamil Nadu (GoTN) is implementing the World Bank aided third Tamil Nadu Urban Development program (TNUDP –III) with a view to improve the delivery of urban services. The Tamil Nadu Urban Infrastructure Financial Services Limited (TNUIFSL) are the fund managers. Under this program, CMDA has taken up the improvement in the traffic and transportation sector within Chennai metropolitan area. The improvement schemes include : -- widening and strengthening of roads to the length of about 150 kms, construction of road over-bridges at 7 locations, road under-bridges at 2 locations, grade separators, and pedestrian subways at 3 locations. These sub- projects will be implemented by the Highways Department (HD), GoTN. b) This report presents the details of the proposed interventions for the widening and strengthening of “Ariyalur Vilangadupakkam Road (Km 0/0- Km 6/4)” from the existing single lane to two lane carriageway including the environmental and social Impact assessment. The project road falling under the Saidapet sub division of Highways Department, takes off at km 6/2 of TPP road near Andarkuppam (km 0/0 of the project road) and ends at km 9/2 on Vadaperumbakkam – Chettimedu Nayiru (VCN) Road (km 6/4 of Project Road) near Kanniampalayam cross road. Total length of the project road is 6.4 kms. d) PIU/PMU/CMDA will adopt the Environmental and Social Framework (ESF) of TNUIFSL as approved by GoTN, in all projects funded under the World Bank assisted Tamil Nadu Urban Development Project – III (TNUDP-III). Detailed procedures for Resettlement and Rehabilitation are given in Resettlement Action Plan (RAP), evolved as a common document for the TNUDP-III projects. These policy provisions will be applied to mitigate possible impacts due to land acquisition and resettlement. e) This Rehabilitation Implementation Plan (RIP) has been formed as the sub project specific document. This sub project falls under S2 category(as per norms specified in Environmental and Social Framework (ESF) of World Bank. The number of

4 project-affected Families (PAFs) in this sub-project is 47 with 178 PAPs. The entire programme is planned to be implemented over a period of 4 to 6 months . The key implementation activities are shown in the „Gantt Chart‟ given in Annexure 7. The estimated total project cost is Rs.95.31 millions. The RIP cost is Rs 2.923 millions which includes compound wall construction for the school at Andarkuppam.

5 CHAPTER 1 Background

1.1 Government of Tamil Nadu (GoTN) is implementing the World Bank aided third Tamil Nadu Urban Development project (TNUDP –III) with a view to improve the delivery of urban services. The Tamil nadu Urban Infrastructure Financial Services Limited (TNUIFSL) are the fund managers. Improvement in the traffic and transportation sector with in Chennai metropolitan area is covered under the above program. Under this component, CMDA has taken up, Traffic and Transportation improvement schemes include : -- widening and strengthening of roads to the length of about 150 kms, construction of road over-bridges at 7 locations, road under-bridges at 2 locations, grade separators at 3 locations, and pedestrian subways at 3 locations. These sub- projects will be implemented by Highways Department (HD), GoTN.

1.2 In order to ensure environmentally and socially responsive development of the above schemes, an Environmental and Social Framework (ESF) as developed by

TNUFSIL has been laid out by Go TN for adoption in TNUDP III projects. ESF contains the policy principles, eligibility criteria, entitlement framework, grievance redress mechanism and arrangement for monitoring and evaluation. The copy of ESF is available on the website http://www.tnudf.com/ESF%20Final%20GO%20Ver.pdf and http://www.cmdatnudp.org

Environmental Assessment and Social management plan are intended to provide inputs to project design by identifying the environmental and social issues early in the project preparation so that measures to mitigate these issues and opportunities for environmental enhancements and Social safeguard measures can be identified and integrated. Resettlement Policy Framework

1.3 The Social Safeguard and Entitlement Framework of TNUIFSL aims at avoiding or minimizing displacement and where displacement is unavoidable, affected people, irrespective of their legal status, to be (a) compensated for their loss at full replacement cost, (b) assisted in the move and supported during the transition period, and (c) assisted in their efforts to improve their former living standards, income earning capacity and production levels, or at least to restore them.

6 1.4 The project level Rehabilitation and Resettlement Action plan (RAP) provides the procedure for Implementation of Social safeguard measures. The SSEF, described in detail in Resettlement Action Plan, confirms to the social safeguard policy on involuntary resettlement (OP 4.12) of The World Bank. The Entitlement matrix is provided in Appendix I . This is available in the office of the Project Management Unit, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA), Egmore, Chennai – 8, office of the Chief Engineer (HD), Chepauk, Chennai – 5 /Project Implementation Unit and is also available on the website http://www.cmdatnudp.org

Land acquisition and R&R measures 1.5 Land acquisition and R&R measures will be adopted in line with the provisions given in ESF and RAP. The Social Safeguard Entitlement matrix is detailed in ESF and extracts are provided in Appendix I enclosed . This is available in the office of the Project Management Unit, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA), Egmore, Chennai – 8, office of the Chief Engineer (HD), Chepauk, Chennai – 5 / Project Implementation Unit and it is also available on the website. An abstract is given below for ready reference. 1.5.1 Procedure for land acquisition: i Where possible and permitted by regulations, the required land will be acquired by implementing agencies through direct purchase based on „willing buyer willing seller‟ principle, as the first option. Negotiations for direct purchase would be carried in a public place and in transparent manner. All proceedings will be documented and final agreement would be signed by the negotiating parties. ii Where direct purchase by implementing agencies is not materialized, negotiated settlement can be reached through the provisions of the TN Highway Act 2001, Clause 19(2), i.e. through the GoTN designated authorities (district collectors or specific authority to be authorized for the sub project) for that purpose, in respect of sub projects for Transportation Component. iii Where negotiated settlement under the procedures specified under (ii) above is not possible, and for other urban projects, required land for the sub-projects would be acquired following the provisions of the LA Act (Emergency clause will not be applied) and the ESF. iv The negotiated amount will be paid within three months from the date of final agreement of the negotiated settlement by the negotiating parties. Interest @12% p.a. will be added for any delay exceeding three months in payment of compensation.

7 v In case of payment of compensation under the TN Highway Act or Land Acquisition Act, all other additional assistance described in the entitlement matrix will be available.

1.5.2 Compensation for Land: Compensation to land will be paid by the State Government at replacement cost to all titleholders from whom land will be acquired for the project as per the procedures described in the following paragraph. Quantum of compensation : Chennai Metropolitan Area (CMA)

(a) Under private negotiations the quantum of compensation will be “higher of 142% Guideline value or registered sale price of similar data land in the vicinity as minimum and 150% as maximum compensation amount for negotiations”. In addition, 9% or any amount that is prevailing at the time of negotiations will be paid towards likely costs of stamp duty and registration charges of the acquired property;

(b) If the guideline values are not updated upto the current financial year in which case the negotiations are taking place with the land owners, then they will be updated @7% p.a. on compounding basis upto the current financial year. Similarly, if the sale deed registered are not available for the one year prior to the date of negotiations, they will be updated @ 7% p.a. compounding basis;

(c) For the purpose of negotiations, if the registered sale values are above 30% of the guideline values, then 130% of guideline value will be considered as the base registered sale price for the purpose of negotiations; and,

(d) The compensation amount will be made available to the land owners both under private negotiations and TN Highway Act prior to taking over of the affected properties;

Resettlement Implementation Plan 1.6 While the above Project Level Resettlement Action Plan (February 2007) contain the policy provisions, entitlement for different impact categories, institutional arrangements, grievance redressal mechanism, M&E process, etc. This Resettlement Implementation Plan presents the details of the proposed Resettlement and rehabilitation/ interventions for the specific sub-project ,viz., widening and strengthening of “Ariyalur Vilangadupakkam Road (Km 0/0- Km 6/4)” from the existing single lane to two lane carriageway including the environmental and social Impact assessment.

Description of the sub-Project 1.7 The project road falling under the Saidapet sub division of Highways Department, takes off at km 6/2 of Tiruvottiyur Ponneri Panchetti (TPP)road near Andarkuppam (km 0/0 of the project road) and ends at km 9/2 on Vadaperumbakkam – Chettimedu Nayiru (VCN) Road (km 6/4 of Project Road) near

8 Kanniampalayam cross road. Total length of the project road is 6.4 kms. The entire project road falls within Ambattur taluk. Key map of the Project road is given in Figure 1.1. The estimated total project cost is Rs.74.0 millions

1.8 The project road traverses through the plain terrain for the entire length and the soil characteristics along the project road is predominantly silty clay in nature. The predominant land use along the project road is residential for the initial 1km section and industrial for the remaining sections.

1.9 This RIP covers the sub-project specific impacts, baseline socio-economic characteristics, outcome of consultations and implementation arrangements including time table and budgets. The objective of this RIP is to ensure that affected persons received the compensation and assistance prior to their moving and such assistance will enable them to improve or retain their living standards.

9

Figure 1.1 Key Map of theofFigureRoad Map 1.1 Project Key

Figure 1.1. Key map of the project road 10

Minimising Resettlement 1.10 Considering the importance of the project, careful planning was made to various components of the road and associated utilities, which affect the safety and operation of the roads. The proposed improvements are aimed at easing traffic congestion; improving the road safety and reducing the accident, improving physical characteristics of the road, which includes road geometry, pavement strength, and drainage; and enhancing the aesthetic. Considering traffic, pavement type and soil characteristics, the entire 6.4 km long section was taken as a single homogeneous section for the design and preparation of the estimates. Traffic warrants the up-gradation of the existing single lane road into standard two lane road. Hence, it is proposed to widen the project road in to two lane carriageway. Accordingly, ROW of 13m, consisting 9m wide formation width which includes 7m wide carriageway and 1m wide gravel shoulders on either side is adopted at the non built-up location. In line with the policy to minimise resettlement at built up locations, where ROW is limited, 7.5m wide carriageway and 1.0m wide foot path cum covered drain on either side is provided.

Land Acquisition: 1.11 The project involves acquisition of 0.63 hectares of land from 25 private land owners for additional RoW including curve improvement and for junctions. The land acquisition schedule is given in Annexure 4

R&R impacts: 1.12 The project will cause impacts to 27 title holders and 20 squatters. The total number of Project Affected Family (PAF) is 47 with about 178 total number of PAPs. The project-affected households is 16 and affected commercial structures are 6 including 25 Private Land owners. The number of PAFs categorised by the severity of impact as identified during the baseline socio- economic survey is given in Table 1.1. There are only 53 PAPs with major impacts out of the total PAPs of 178 nos. This sub project falls under S2 category as per norms specified in Environmental and Social Framework (ESF) of World Bank. A summary of PAFs are provided as Annexure to this document for reference.

11

Table 1.1 Project-affected household by category Impact category Number Entitlements Remarks PAFs PAPs Major1 Social Impacts (a) Replacement cost • 2 PAFs who are title Title Holder 2 10 for land holders of only land (b) Replacement cost are entitled for (a), Non-title Holder 19 43 for structure (c), (d)and (e). (c) Rehabilitation grant (d) Shifting allowance - Of the 19 PAFs, all (e) Maintenance are squatters and are allowance for 6 eligible for (b), (d), (e) months and (f). (f) Right to salvage • Material Minor2 Social Impacts (g) Replacement cost • Of 25 PAFs, 23 PAFs for land who are title (h) Replacement cost holders of only land Title Holder 25 123 for affected portion are entitled for only of the structure (g). Non-title Holder 1 2 (i) Transitional • 2 PAF who are title allowance equivalent holders and own to two months structure entitled (j) Transitional for (g) (h) and (i) allowance equivalent • 1 PAF who is to two months squatter entitled for (j) only. Total PAHs 47 178

1.13 The structures used by the community will be relocated by the respective line department and it will be coordinated by the Divisional Engineer (Highways Department) concerned. The relocation of community structures will be reviewed by the Project Engineer during the regular review meetings of the PIU and it will be ensured that all community structures and utilities as shown in Table 1.2 are relocated prior to commencement of civil works.

1 Major Impact is based on the severity of the impact and loss of the following for the PAHs (a) Loss of place of dwelling requiring relocation, (b) Loss of place of business requiring relocation, (c) Loss of livelihood requiring alternate source of income, and (d) Loss of 20% or more of agriculturally productive land out of the affected land holding, or Loss of land due to severance or acquisition and the remaining land is not economically viable.

2 Minor Impact is one who is affected to a lesser degree than the major impacts defined above and does not get relocated. Compensation for minor impacts will be limited to one-time payment of cash or giving advance notice. 12

Table 1.2. Project-affected Community Structures Categorisation Overall(Nos) Well 0 Shifting of water supply line 9 kms Place of worship 0 Total 0

1.14 The project involves acquisition of 0.63 hectares from 25 private land owners and 0.77 hectares of Government land. Apart from these 0.0063 hectares of temple land is to be acquired and the details of the land acquisition is shown in Table 1.3.

Table 1.3. Land to be acquired Total Project Component (in hectares) Private Land 0.63 Govt Land 0.77 Temple Land 0.0063 Total 1.41

13 CHAPTER 2 Socio Economic Characteristics of PAPs

2.1 A baseline socio-economic survey was undertaken during 2nd and 3rd June 2005 which is the cut off date and the details are given in Annexure 1 and the key socio economic indicators are given in Table 2.1

Methodology Adopted 2.2 The baseline social survey was undertaken to survey the assets that are affected due to the proposed widening. Structures identified were photographed and a household record comprising the following information was prepared. : Identification of household (Name of the Head of Household, HD Chainage, Location of structure (left or right of the road), administrative jurisdiction). Details of private asset affected with plinth dimension - inside and outside Corridor of Impact (CoI) Household particulars (religion, social group) Details of household members (names of family members, sex, age, education, occupation) Income details Building / structure details (ownership, use, offset distance from existing centreline, roof and wall material) Other affected assets (boundary wall, well) Details of affected agricultural land (extent, type, irrigation) Business activity (nature, employee details) Distance from essential services

Key baseline characteristics Head of the Project-affected household by Sex 2.3 It is found that 69% of the project-affected households (PAHs) are headed by men and the remaining 31% are women-headed households as given in Table 1 under Annexure 1.

Age group of the Project Affected Persons 2.4 It is found that 41.5% of the project affected persons fall in the category of 25 to 40 years of age and only 7.6 % of the people are more than 60 years as given in Table 2 under Annexure 1.

14 Household Size 2.5 It is exactly 50 % of the affected families with less than 3 members and 45.5% of them have 4 family members. Only 4.5% of them have 5 family members as given in Table 3 under Annexure 1. Social strata of the PAPs 2.6 None of the forward class or backward class families are affected due to the proposed project. Majority, 77% of the affected family belong to Most Backward class and 23% of them are from the Scheduled Caste Category as given in Table 5 under Annexure 1.

Literacy level of the PAPs by Sex ( >6 age group) 2.7 Among the Project affected Persons nearly 70% are Literates and 19% are illiterates. Around 11 % of the PAPs are under 6 years age group category. Among the male, 85% of them are literate and only 15% of them are illiterate. When compared with male literates, the female literates are less (73%) and illiterates are more (27%) as given in Table 6 under Annexure 1.

Education level by Sex of PAPs 2.8 Among the PAPs, 20% of them have undergone primary education and 29% have undergone middle school education. Only 15% of them have undergone high school studies. When education level is compared between male and female, it is less among the female. It is inferred that 45% of the female have undergone middle school education whereas 54% of the male have undergone middle school education. It is also inferred that higher secondary education and college education is very minimum among the PAPs as given in Table 7 under Annexure 1.

Main activity of the PAPs 2.9 Nearly 39% of the PAPs are not in workforce that comprises of old women and children. 24% of the rest are working as agricultural labour. Only 27% of them are doing petty business like vegetable and green leaves selling and 6% of them are working as casual labour in small industries as given in Table 8 under Annexure 1.

Income of the PAHs 2.10 Since majority (49%)of the PAPs in workforce are working as a agricultural labour their earning is less than Rs.2000 per month. Nearly 27% of them earn around Rs.3000 per month and only 13% of them earn Rs.4000 per month as given in Table 9 under Annexure 1.

Type of Affected Structure 2.11 None of the Permanent structures are affected and due to this proposed road widening project. 2 Semi pucca structures and 17 Temporary structures are affected. Compound wall/fence are affected for 3 structures as given in Table 10 under Annexure 1. 15

Period of Occupancy 2.12 It was inferred from analysis that 95.5% of the PAPS are residing there for more than 5 years with three generations and only 4.5% of them are living for less than 5 years as given in Table 13 under Annexure 1.

Assets by offset distance from centreline 2.13 The offset distance from the existing road center line to the property edge of the PAPs varies and about 73% of the properties lie at the distance of 3 to 4m from the centre line. 18.0% of them lie at the distance of 5m and only 9% (1 no)of the PAPs property lie at the distance less than 3m as given in Table 14 under Annexure 1.

Perceived benefits of the project 2.14 The most important benefit cited by the PAPs was Better transport system. The next benefit cited was reduced travel cost and reduced travel time. Very few people (5.4%) have perceived about the appreciation of property value and increase in customers. Key socio-economic indicators Table:2.1 Key Socio-economic Indicators S.No Indicator Unit Value/Figur e a) Income (N= 22) 1 Monthly family income Average Rs.2714.00 2 No. of earners Average 1.5 b) Occupation (N = 22) 2 Business establishment % 43 3 Casual Labourers % 17 4 Agricultural labour % 34 5 Salaried % 6 6 Cultivators % 0 c) Housing (N = 22) 7 Permanent % 0 8 Semi-permanent % 9.1 9 Temporary Houses % 77.3 10 Compound wall/fence % 13.6 d) Demographic Details (N = 22) 11 Family size Average 3.54 12 Women headed household % 31 e) Standard of Living (N =22) 13 Having separate kitchen % 12.5

16 14 Having separate toilet % 12.5 15 Having separate bath % 12.5 16 Houses electrified % 100 17 Piped drinking water % 100 Material Assets 18 Proportion of households having mixer % 16 19 Proportion of households having grinder % 16 20 Proportion of households having BW/Colour % 40 Television % 20 21 Proportion of households having mobile phone % 20 22 Proportion of households having two wheelers

Stake holders Consultations and Disclosure to PAPs:

Consultation and participation process 2.15 Strengthening & widening of Ariyalur – Vilangadupakkam road provides both opportunities & threats for the people associated with the villages. In order to identify the opportunities and adverse effects, discussions and interviews were conducted with various stakeholders along the road. The stakeholders involved were

Resident villagers.

Project affected people

Head Mistress and Teachers of Government school.

Share auto drivers.

Lorry Drivers.

Industry 2.16 The participants conveyed their happiness and promised their co-operation for the project. The following opportunities were anticipated and enumerated by the resident villages during discussion.

Increased business opportunities.

Increased bus trips.

Increased Land prices

Easier connectivity to Redhills and Puzhal.

Improved roadscape and signage etc.

17 However, the villagers also anticipated the following threats.

Increased traffic posing accident hazards.

Increased noise pollution due to movement of heavy vehicles.

Discussion with Project Affected People (PAPs)

2.17 The views of project-affected people were noted during the questionnaire survey

Fear of Non Compensation

Losing livelihood and employment opportunity

Poor economy to relocate or construct a new house.

However, after explaining the compensation plan, the PAP‟s were satisfied and ready to relocate from the existing locations. The PAP‟s also realised the opportunities that the project would provide to them and were happy that their fellow villagers would be getting immensely benefited by the project.

2.18 The following problems were faced by the school children and teachers with the existing road and facilities.

Narrow road, posing accident hazards.

Minimal frequency of bus trips to Redhills and Thiruvottiyur from where most of the teachers come

Absence of speed breakers near the school

Prolonged waiting time for the bus

Unsafe situation for pedestrian students

The following opportunities were anticipated by the teachers and students.

Increased MTC bus facility and better mobility for the students and teachers.

Better signage‟s reducing accident hazards.

Safe pedestrian movement

Increased business opportunities for the villagers.

Probability of students taking up higher education due to enhanced mobility.

The participants raised concerns of increased noise pollution during construction and operation phase. However, the principal realised that it would be only a minor problem and could be solved with better traffic plans and noise pollution measures.

18 Discussion with Share Auto drivers, Lorry Drivers.

2.19 Regarding the problems the drivers were facing and the opportunities and threat the proposed project would pose were discussed.

Following are the problems they are facing with the existing road.

Uneven road surface

Longer travel time

Existing Single lane posing threats of accident

Poor geometrics & Non standard curves posing threats for accident.

The following opportunities were anticipated from the proposed widening and strengthening of the project road.

Faster travel time (anticipated that the travel time will reduce by half)

Easier and smoother flow of traffic

Improved business opportunity

Improved service delivery

However, the drivers were worried about the maintenance and sustenance of the road during rainy seasons and movement of heavy motor vehicles.

Discussion with Industry owners.

2.20 The following problems were faced by the industries due to the existing road.

Difficulty in mobility for Heavy vehicles and longer travel time

Inconvenience to public due to the movement of heavy vehicles

High risk of accident due to single lane

Minimal bus trips for employees.

The following opportunities were anticipated due to the proposed project

Better mobility for heavy vehicles

Easier access to connecting towns

Increased MTC bus trips for employees

Reduced risk of accidents

Better business prospects with improved linkages.

Interaction with the industry explicated that the proposed project will reduce accidents & present better mobility and better business prospect was anticipated.

19

Public Consultation

2.21 On completion of Socio-Economic Survey, focus group discussions along the project road and after identifying the number of families being affected, Public consultation was held on 29.08.2005 at 5.00 p.m. in the Panchayat Union Middle School, Andarkuppam. The PAPs, Village heads and the general public were informed by distributing necessary handouts with details on proposed project along with the day, time and venue of the public consultation two days in advance. Attendance sheet of the Public Consultation is enclosed as Annexure 5 of this document.

2.22 The public consultation was conducted by the ADE (H) Saidapet, HD. The participants included Project Affected Persons (PAPs) covered under the survey, village heads and interested general public. The ADE (H) briefed the audience about the proposed project and explained the purpose of conducting the public consultation. During the above meeting the details of the list of PAP‟s and extent of land to be acquired including their entitlements were disclosed. With this background, the following issues were taken up for discussion and public opinion on these issues were sought.

Issues raised

2.23 The Socio-Economic issues such as Land Acquisition and the benefits from the project were brought up for discussion. Residents from Andarkuppam village informed that the existing land owned by Highways Department on the left side of the project road from km 0/0 to 1/0 should be considered before acquiring private land for proposed road widening. PAPs of Andarkuppam village confirmed that they have encroached and staying on the government land and are willing to relocate. Provision should be made in the estimate for shifting the existing Panchayat water pipe line for the proposed road widening. President and members of the concerned Panchayats requested for the fund allotment in the TNUDP project to repair the panchayat assets, which would get damaged during road construction. Also they have requested that a complete copy of the land acquisition particulars of concerned villages shall be made available for reference PAPs were apprehensive about the compensation they would be given by the Government. They expressed their views that compensation should be fair and should be disbursed in time. Villagers expressed their happiness and welcomed the initiative of Highways department for having conducted the Stake holder meeting with complete

20 details of the proposed project for having given the opportunity to express their suggestions and opinion.

Mitigation Measures

2.24 Resettlement Action Plan adequately addresses the benefits to be extended to the Project Affected Persons and has an inbuilt clause that compensation disbursement and benefits are to be disbursed to the PAPs before commencement of civil works. PAP‟s were explained that care has been taken to use the available government land as far as possible and when it is unavoidable acquisition of patta land is envisaged for the proposed widening. PAP‟s were explained that the compensation for the affected structures are arrived at as per ESF policies of the World Bank PAP‟s were explained that the necessary provisions are already made in the project for shifting the utilities such as electrical lines, telephone lines and water pipelines. Also the Highways Department assured that maximum care will be taken to continue the water supply during shifting of utilities without any problem. The HD confirmed that Panchayat assets are not affected due to the proposed widening. The HD assured that the acquisition particulars are available at the Highways office at Saidapet and village Panchayat offices would be provided with the copy of necessary particulars. Assurance was given that all eligible PAPs will be suitably compensated.

Snap shots of the Public Consultation

Detailed Disclosure:

2.25 The detailed and specific disclosure of eligible PAPs after completion of joint verification will be made at least one month prior to commencement of RIP in the website of TNUDP-III, in addition to display in notice boards of Public Information Centres . A draft disclosure is already available in the website for this project which

21 will be continuously updated. The final entitlements will be disclosed through individual intimations and in a meeting to be convened by the PIU for the purpose.

22

CHAPTER 3 Implementation Mechanism

Project Level RAP 3.1 The Project Level RAP describes in detail about the institutional arrangement for the implementation of the sub-project level RIP. Project Implementation Unit 3.2 The Project Implementation Unit (PIU) will be headed by the Project Engineer ( Superintending Engineer cadre) who will also be in charge of the Resettlement and Rehabilitation. The R&R cell and the L.A. Cell, comprising of Special Deputy Collector, Deputy Tahsildar, Revenue Inspector and field staff, will work together in the implementation of the RIP. The R&R cell will comprise of the R&R Manager, the community development specialist and the data entry operator. They will be supported by an NGO appointed for facilitating the implementation of the RIPs in Thiruvallur District. The roles and responsibilities are described in detail in the Project Level RAP.

Implementation 3.3 The entire programme is planned to be implemented over a period of 4 to 6 months. The key implementation activities are shown in the „Gantt Chart‟ given in Annexure 7. However if there is any delay in implementation due to unforeseen circumstances, the period of PIU will be extended accordingly. The date of commencement of the RAP will be the date on which this component gets administrative sanction. However, the RIP implementation will commence upon approval and adoption of this report by the PIU. Each entitled unit (family/persons) will be issued an identity card that will list the various support mechanisms and amount of assistance to be given. Individual notice to all PAFs will be issued listing his/her entitlements under the project and will invite title holders for negotiation. Further, PIU will be responsible in ensuring that no civil work commences prior to satisfactory completion of the implementation of RIP and PIU will also ensure that the compensation and resettlement assistance is provided prior to taking over of the assets for project implementation. The linkages between resettlement implementation and civil works timetable are available in RAP (vide para 5.24)

Steps in Implementation 3.4 The main steps in implementation of the programme include: . Disclosure of the RIP,

23 . Issuing identity cards and information brochure, . Collection of additional information (information of expenditure and debt for impact assessment purpose) for impact evaluation purpose . Negotiations with PAPs for purchase of land and assets, . Valuation of assets . Payment of compensation, . Delivery of rehabilitation assistance, and . Replacement and up gradation of community assets

3.5 Cut-off Date is established to identify and enumerate the Entitled Persons. The date on which the census survey commenced will be the cut-off date for non- titleholders occupying the RoW. For legal owners, the cut-off date will be the notification by the PIU declaring the intention to acquire the property. For those legal owners who are not agreeable to compensation through negotiations, the date of serving the notice under Tamil Nadu Highways Act will be established as the cut-off date.

3.6 During construction, there could be changes in the alignment and such changes may impact some newer people and cause more impact to already identified PAPs. In such case, all those getting affected due to change in alignment depending on the category of impact will be included as PAP and will receive entitlement as per the ESF policy framework. For such PAHs and for PAHs who might have been left out during Base line Social Survey and identified later during implementation, the cut-off date will be the date on which they are enumerated. The PIU will be responsible to ensure that such people are not left out.

Costs and Budget 3.7 The Budget Estimate is given in Table 3.1. The compensation for the land and structures are given in Annexure 2 and 3. The land costs are based on the information collected from the official website of Tamil Nadu Registration Department for the year 2004 ( as the draft alone is ready for the year 2007). Since land costs are arrived with 2004 rates, a cumulative increase with 7% of the amount per year has been calculated for the period till 2006. And the unit rates for entitlements are based on the PWD schedule of rates for the various type of building (2006-2007) for Tiruvallur District. An increase of 10% of the unit rates is been calculated to meet the price escalation for the current year 2007-08. The cost of RIP including compound wall (refer BOQ.no.11-1g)construction for the school at Andarkuppam is Rs.29.23 lakhs and this cost is also incorporated in the Project cost.

24

Table 3.1 Budget Estimate

Unit Rate Amount Component Unit (in lakhs) Quantity (in lakhs)

Compensation

Private Land Sq.m. 0.002565 6300 16.16

Temple land Sq.m. 0.0044 63.63 0.28

Temporary Structures Sq.m 0.00957 260.75 2.5

Semi-permanent Structures Sq.m 0.025 35.65 0.89

Permanent Structures Sq.m 0 0 0 Compound wall (Stone Running masonry) meter 0.01 6 0.06 Running Compound wall for school meter 0.026 45 1.165

R&R Assistance

Rehabilitation grant for land One Time 0.000025 1126.45 0.028 Maintenance allowance & shifting allowance for land One Time 0.00021 1126.45 0.24

Building allowance One time 0.00285 296.4 0.845

Livelihood allowance One time 0.144 19 2.74

Shifting Allowance One time 0.01 19 0.19 Stamp duty & Registration cost One time 0.000233 6363.63 1.483

Community Assets

Well Unit 0 0 0

Water Supply tap* Unit 0 0 0

Hand Pumps* Unit 0 0 0

Bus Shelter* Unit 0 0 0

Water bodies (Ponds) Unit 0 0 0

Other Community Assets Unit 0 0 0

Sub Total 26.58

Contingency @ 10% 2.65

Total 29.23

* Budget Estimate for shifting of utilities is included in Project cost

25

Grievance Redressal Committee / Mechanism:

3.8 The PIU will make effort at project level through negotiations in minimum possible time. Unresolved Grievances will be handled by a Grievance Redress Committee (GRC) Any aggrieved PAP can approach GRC, controlled by the appropriate Commissioner of ULB, which is constituted by the PIU. It will consist of a panel of three Members, one of whom shall be the PIU representative from the sub- project (who will be the convener). The others will include representative of the residents of the area / local body who are publicly known to be persons of integrity, good judgment and command respect; and a representative of local NGO/CBO. If the PAPs grievance is not addressed, subsequently PIU will refer to District Collector, during the Collectors weekly grievance redress day. If the PAP is still unsatisfied with the decisions taken by the project and the Collector he would as a last recourse can appeal in the court of law. The details on the existence of this committee shall be published in the websites and Notice Boards of agencies associated with this project.

The role of GRC: 3.9 The Role of PIU representative of the GRC: Convene meetings of the committee as necessary at such place or places in the PIU as he considers appropriate; Record, categorize and prioritize the grievances of PAPs To inform the aggrieved parties about the status of their grievances and to communicate the decisions. Conduct the proceedings in an informal manner as considered appropriate with the object to bring an amicable settlement between the parties;

3.10 The decision of the committee, shall be recorded in writing and attested copies thereof shall be provided to the parties. All expenses incurred in arranging grievance negotiations and meetings of GRC as well as logistics required, shall be arranged by Project-Implementing Unit (PIU). The Proposed organization structure in PIU is given in Figure 3.1

Monitoring and Evaluation 3.11 The Project Level RAP describes in detail about the monitoring and evaluation arrangement for this component. The key socio-economic indicators given in Chapter-2 will be used to evaluate the RIP. The M & E indicator format is given in Annexure 6

26 Figure 3.1 Proposed Organisation Structure in PIU

Project Implementation Unit

Project Engineer (Superintending Engineer) Head PIU and R&R Committee

Road Safety Specialist Divisional Engineer for each district Asst. Divisional Engineers Asst. Engineers Environmental Specialist

Accounts unit R&R Cell: R&R Manager Community Development Specialist LA Cell: Data Entry Operator Spl. Dy Collector Dep. Tashildar , Revenue Inspector and field staffs

Members of LA Negotiation Committee NGO’s – for each (R&R Committee) District Spl. Deputy Collector - LA Cell Person of Repute DE Highways

Grievance Redressal PAP’s External Monitoring (R&R)

Committee – TNUIFSL

27 Annexure 1 : Baseline Socio Economic Survey

Table:1 Head of Household (HH) by Sex Head of Household All Members (PAPs) Sex Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage Male 11 69 32 52 Female 5 31 29 48

Table:2 Age group of PAPs Age classification Frequency Percentage Upto 5 6 11.3 6 – 14 7 13.2 15 – 24 7 13.2 25 – 40 22 41.5 41 – 60 7 13.2 > 60 4 7.6 Total 53 100

Table:3 Size of household Size of household Frequency Percentage 1 – 3 11 50 4 10 45.5 5 1 4.5 6 – 7 0 0 8+ and above 0 0 Total 16 100

Table:4 Project-affected household by Religion Religion Frequency Percentage Hindu 22 100 Muslim 0 0 Christian 0 0 Others 0 0

Table:5 Project-affected household by Social Group Community Frequency Percentage FC 0 0 BC 0 0 MBC 17 77 SC 5 23 ST 0 0

Table:6 Literacy by Sex of PAPs (> 6 age group) Male Female Literacy Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage Can read and write 24 85 19 73 Cannot read and write 4 15 7 27

Table:7 Education level by Sex of PAPs Male Female Education Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage Primary 5 16 7 26 Middle school 12 38 5 19 High school 5 16 4 15 Higher secondary 0 0 1 4 Graduate 1 3 0 0 Post graduate 0 0 0 0 Technical education 1 3 0 0 None 4 13 7 26 Children (<= 6 yrs) 4 13 3 11 32 100 27 100

29 Table:8 Main Activity by Sex of PAPs Male Female Main Activity Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage Cultivation 0 0 0 0 Agricultural labour 7 21 7 27 Casual labour 5 15 0 0 Private sector salaried 0 0 0 0 Public sector salaried 0 0 0 0 Household shop 0 0 0 0 Business 11 33 5 19 Other workforce 1 3 0 0 Unemployed 0 0 0 0 Not in workforce 9 27 14 54

Table:9 Income of PAHs Salary Range Frequency Percentage (per month in Rs.) upto 1000 2 9.0 1001 – 2000 9 40.0 2001 – 3000 6 27.0 3001 – 4000 1 4.5 4001 – 5000 3 13.6 Above 5000 0 0.0 Not disclosed 1 4.5

Table:10 Type of affected Structure Type of Structure Frequency Percentage Permanent 0 0 Semi-Permanent 2 9.1 Temporary 17 77.3 Compound wall, Shelter, well etc 3 13.6 Total 22 100

30 Table:11 Type of Structure by tenure Frequency Type of Structure Owner Encroacher Squatter Permanent - - 0 Semi-Permanent - - 2 Temporary - - 17 Compound wall, Shelter, well etc 2 - 1 Total 2 - 20

Table:12 Use of Structure by type

Frequency Percentage

Use

Semi Semi Semi

Temporary Temporary

Permanent Permanent

permanent permanent

Residence only 0 2 11 0 9 50.0 Residence and business 0 0 1 0 0 4.5 Business Only 0 0 5 0 0 22.7 Others (Compound wall, fence, 1 1 1 4.5 4.5 4.5 toilet)

Table:13 Period of occupancy by type of structure

Type of Structure Frequency Percentage

Period of Semi Semi

Occupancy Semi

Temporary Temporary

Permanent Permanent

permanent permanent

Under 1 year 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 - 5 year 0 0 1 0 0 4.5 Over 5 years 1 3 17 4.5 13.6 77.4

31

Table:14 Assets by offset distance from centreline Distance from Frequency Percentage Centreline Less than 3m 2 9 3m and upto 4m 6 73 5m 4 18 above 5m 0 0

Table:15 Impact to structure by type of structure Frequency Type of Structure Wholly Partly inside inside CoI CoI Permanent - - Semi permanent 2 - Temporary 17 - Compound wall, shelter, well, etc. - 3

32 Annexure 2 : Compensation for the land affected

If more than 20% of the land acquired Computed Max.com 9% guide line pensation stamp value for @ 150% Rate of duty & Rehabil Maintena Land year 2007 of Land registrati itation nce Shifting Total Land Sl. Survey Side (L Area Area @ 7% per guideline compensa on cost grant allowance allowance compensati No. Village Name No. / R) (Sq.m) (Sq.Ft) year value tion (Rs) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.) on cost(Rs) 1 Ariyalur 129/3 L 501.02 5392.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 Ariyalur 119 / 4 R 27.87 300.0 40.63 60.95 18285.01 1645.65 19930.66 3 Ariyalur 119 / 5 R 63.30 681.4 1.97 2.95 2009.52 180.86 2190.37 4 Ariyalur 119 / 6 R 35.79 385.2 4.39 6.59 2537.48 228.37 2765.86

Full Stretch Realign 5 Ariyalur 165/1 ment 969.69 10437.7 27.53 41.29 430971.59 38787.44 469759.03

Full Stretch Realign 6 Ariyalur 165/2 ment 22.53 242.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 Ariyalur 19/3 R 140.13 1508.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 Ariyalur 20 R 373.02 4015.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9 Ariyalur 167/1 L 69.11 743.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10 Ariyalur 167/3 L 764.70 8231.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11 Ariyalur 53/1B R 155.61 1675.0 17.04 25.56 42813.16 3853.18 46666.34 12 Ariyalur 53/4 R 207.58 2234.4 17.04 25.56 57111.73 5140.06 62251.78 Full Stretch Realign 13 Ariyalur 29/2 ment 1028.38 11069.4 0.66 0.98 10882.28 979.41 2536.09 12000 1000 27397.78

Full Stretch Realign 14 Ariyalur 29/4 ment 1986.30 21380.4 0.66 0.98 21018.96 1891.71 22910.67 15 Ariyalur 30/4A R 100.67 1083.6 2.03 3.05 3302.39 297.21 3599.60 16 Ariyalur 30/4B R 479.73 5163.8 2.03 3.05 15737.11 1416.34 17153.45 17 Ariyalur 51/4 R 14.96 161.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18 Ariyalur 103/6 R 466.42 5020.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19 Ariyalur 103/7a R 35.33 380.3 18.35 27.53 10468.11 942.13 11410.24 20 Ariyalur 103/7b R 53.35 574.3 18.35 27.53 15807.34 1422.66 17230.00 21 Ariyalur 62/5 R 207.15 2229.7 1.25 1.87 4164.90 374.84 4539.75 22 Ariyalur 62/9 R 98.07 1055.6 2.49 3.74 3943.54 354.92 241.85 12000 1000 17540.31 23 Kadapakkam 317/2 R 75.20 809.4 20.97 31.46 25464.45 2291.80 27756.25 24 Kadapakkam 317/1 R 4.57 49.2 20.97 31.46 1547.51 139.28 1686.78 25 Kadapakkam 318/1 R 64.62 695.6 9.04 13.57 9436.53 849.29 10285.82 26 Kadapakkam 318/2A R 32.16 346.2 9.04 13.57 4696.36 422.67 5119.03 27 Kadapakkam 318/2B R 54.85 590.4 9.04 13.57 8009.81 720.88 8730.69 28 Kadapakkam 318/3B R 89.01 958.1 9.04 13.57 12998.23 1169.84 14168.07 29 Kadapakkam 319 R 25.43 273.7 9.04 13.57 3713.57 334.22 4047.79 30 Kadapakkam 327 R 977.20 10518.5 26.22 39.32 413627.95 37226.52 450854.47 31 Manali 15 L 376.28 4050.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32 Manali 2 L 44.00 473.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33 Manali 3/1 L 339.69 3656.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34 Manali 3/2 L 236.39 2544.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35 Manali 70 L 83.77 901.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

34 36 Manali 69 L 633.07 6814.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37 Manali 92 L 162.03 1744.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 38 Manali 64/2 L 194.77 2096.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39 Manali 64/4 L 19.33 208.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40 Manali 8/1A L 272.33 2931.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 41 Manali 8/1B L 195.43 2103.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 42 Manali 10/1A L 253.82 2732.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43 Manali 10/1B L 479.25 5158.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 44 Manali 10/5 L 291.30 3135.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45 Vilankadupakkam 397 R 25.43 273.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46 Vilankadupakkam 396 R 193.80 2086.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47 Vilankadupakkam 422/1a L 573.60 6174.2 32.77 49.15 303490.83 27314.18 330805.01 48 Vilankadupakkam 422/5 L 5.35 57.6 32.77 49.15 2830.68 254.76 3085.44 49 Vilankadupakkam 422/6 L 19.39 208.7 32.77 49.15 10259.22 923.33 11182.55 50 Vilankadupakkam 422/16 L 54.02 581.5 32.77 49.15 28581.89 2572.37 31154.27 51 Vilankadupakkam 342/2 R 63.63 684.9 27.53 41.29 28279.89 2545.19 30825.08 52 Vilankadupakkam 359 L 142.31 1531.8 43.26 64.88 99390.71 8945.16 108335.87 53 Vilankadupakkam 358 L 31.15 335.3 28.84 43.26 14503.64 1305.33 15808.97 54 Vilankadupakkam 361/1 L 45.81 493.1 2.70 4.05 1997.21 179.75 2176.96 55 Vilankadupakkam 361/2 L 38.81 417.7 2.70 4.05 1692.03 152.28 1844.31 56 Vilankadupakkam 361/3 L 142.51 1534.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 361/D/ 57 Vilankadupakkam 3 L 42.18 454.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 58 Vilankadupakkam 386/2A L 56.44 607.5 38.01 57.02 34640.28 3117.63 37757.91 0.00 Total 14139.64 152197.81 541.91 812.86 1644213.91 147979.25 2777.94 24000.00 2000.00 1820971.10

35

Annexure 3 : Budget Estimate for R & R

Cash Building Side Total compensa allowance Livelihoo (Left Type of Total Area Cost / tion for (25% of Shifting d Total S.N Name of Head of or Structur L B area in in Sq.ft structure structure Allowan assistan Cost o Family Chainage Right) Tenure e Impact (m) (m) Sq. M Sq.Ft (Rs.) (Rs.) cost) ce (Rs.) ce (Rs.) (Rs.) Non Commercial Establishments NC1 Moongilan 0/0 – 0/6 Left Squatter Kutcha Major 4.5 3.7 16.65 179.22 83 14786 3696 1000 14400 33882 NC2 Mr. Ellappan 0/0 – 0/6 Left Squatter Kutcha Major 3.5 3.2 11.2 120.56 83 9946 2486 1000 14400 27832 NC3 V. Anandan 0/0 – 0/6 Left Squatter Kutcha Major 5.5 3 16.5 177.60 83 14652 3663 1000 14400 33715 NC4 Kadaliammal 0/0 – 0/6 Left Squatter Kutcha Major 2.5 3 7.5 80.73 83 6660 1665 1000 14400 23725 Semi NC5 R. Santhi 0/0 – 0/6 Left Squatter pucca Major 3.65 6 21.9 235.73 231 54454 13613 1000 14400 83467 Kutcha Major 2 3.65 7.3 78.58 55 4322 1080 5402 NC6 Ms. Kanthamma 0/0 – 0/6 Left Squatter Kutcha Major 3.35 6 20.1 216.35 83 17849 4462 1000 14400 37712 NC7 P. Ravi 0/0 – 0/6 Left Squatter Kutcha Major 3 6 18 193.75 83 15984 3996 1000 14400 35381 NC8 Ms. Gnanasoundari 0/0 – 0/6 Left Squatter Kutcha Major 2.4 2.4 5.76 62.00 83 5115 1279 1000 14400 21794 Kutcha Major 1.2 1.2 1.44 15.50 83 1279 320 1598 NC9 R. Ulaganathan 0/0 – 0/6 Left Squatter Kutcha Major 6 4.9 29.4 316.46 83 26108 6527 1000 14400 48035 NC1 0 Kuppusamy 0/0 – 0/6 Left Squatter Kutcha Major 6 4.5 27 290.63 83 23977 5994 1000 14400 45371 NC1 1 D. Venkatesan 0/0 – 0/6 Left Squatter Kutcha Major 3 3.65 10.95 117.86 55 6483 1621 1000 14400 23503 NC1 Semi 2 D. Murugan 0/0 – 0/6 Left Squatter pucca Major 5.5 2.5 13.75 148.00 231 34189 8547 1000 14400 58136 NC1 3 P. Krishnaveni 0/8 – 1/0 Left Squatter Kutcha Major 4.5 3 13.5 145.31 83 11988 2997 1000 14400 30385

Fence / Compound Wall NC1 4 P. Manokaran 3/4 – 3/6 Left Owner Pucca Minor 500 500 NC1 5 Jeyakumar 5/5 – 5/6 Right Squatter Kutcha Minor 500 500

36 NC Semi 875/r. 16 A. Nithiyananthan 5/6 – 5/7 Left Owner pucca Minor 5 m 4375 4375

Commercial Establishments C1 Mr. Panneer 0/6 – 0/8 Left Squatter Kutcha Major 3.65 3 10.95 117.86 83 9724 2431 1000 14400 25124 C2 Mrs. Rajammal 0/6 – 0/8 Left Squatter Kutcha Major 3 3 9 96.88 55 5328 1332 1000 14400 20728 C3 Mr. Velayudham 0/8 – 1/0 Left Squatter Kutcha Major 2.5 2.5 6.25 67.27 55 3700 925 1000 14400 19100 C4 Mr. A.G. Manickam 0/8 – 1/0 Left Squatter Kutcha Major 6 6 36 387.50 165 63938 15984 1000 14400 79338 C5 Mr. A.Renganathan 4/5 – 4/6 Left Squatter Kutcha Major 2.8 2.5 7 75.35 55 4144 1036 1000 14400 19544 C6 NA 4/6 – 4/7 Right Squatter Kutcha Major 2.5 2.5 6.25 67.27 55 3700 925 1000 14400 19100

296.4 343700 84581 19000 273600 699000

37

Annexure 4.1 : Land Acquisition Schedule

Name of : Kadapakkam Village Taluk : Ambattur District : Thiruvallur If more than 20% of the land Boundaries Computed acquired Acquir guide line 9% Total Sl. Survey ed value for Max.compen Rate of stamp Total Ownership of Land area No. No. Area year 2007- sation @ Maintena Land duty & Land North East South West (Sqm) (Sq.m) 08 @ 7% 150% of Rehabili nce Shifting compens registr compens per guideline tation allowanc allowan ation ation ation year value grant e ce (Rs) cost cost(Rs) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Squatters houses (Rathinam, Vaduvambal, Narayanasamy, Naavalavan, Raja 1 booshanam, Sarada ammal, Varadhan, Parthasarathy, Dinakaran & 2291.8 317/2 309 318 Lakshmanan)) 2350 75.20 20.97 31.46 25464.45 0 27756.25

2 317/1 309 318 Vacant 150 4.57 20.97 31.46 1547.51 139.28 1686.79 Padmavathy ammal 3 w/o. Pattabi naicker,Gopal s/o. 318/1 309 317 320 Samynathan 2550 64.62 9.04 13.57 9436.53 849.29 10285.82 Deenadayalan 4 318/2 s/o.Sammantha A 309 317 320 Naicker 1200 32.16 9.04 13.57 4696.36 422.67 5119.03

5 318/2 B 309 317 320 Mani 1050 54.85 9.04 13.57 8009.81 720.88 8730.69 Santhanam s/o. 6 318/3 Suriya narayana 1169.8 B 309 317 320 naicker 800 89.01 9.04 13.57 12998.23 4 14168.07

38 Kaliyan Ramanuja koodam vanniya kula 7 sathriya darma 319 320 318 sathira trust 600 25.43 9.04 13.57 3713.57 334.22 4047.79 Squatters houses and shops(Varadhan, Mangalakshmi, Nandagopal, 8 Arumugham, Balu, Kannan, Kamarajapuram Burial ground, Kanniyampettai Burial 413627.9 37226. 450854.4 327 147 326 329 ground and Shops) 977.20 26.22 39.32 5 52 7 522648.9 Total 1 Note: As per Tamilnadu Government guideline value for chennai zone, Kadapakkam Village(year

2004)

39 Annexure 4.2 : Land Acquisition Schedule

Name of Village : Manali Taluk : Ambattur District : Thiruvallur

If more than 20% of the land Boundaries Computed acquired guide line Total Acquired value for Max.compe Total Sl. Survey Ownership area Area year 2007- nsation @ 9% stamp Land No. No. of Land North East South West (Sqm) (Sq.m) 08 @ 7% 150% of Mainten Rate of duty & compe per guideline Rehabilita ance Shifting Land registrati nsation year value tion allowanc allowanc compens on cost (Rs./Sq.ft) (Rs./Sq.ft) grant(Rs.) e(Rs.) e(Rs.) ation (Rs) cost(Rs.) (Rs) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

1 71 73 69 1550 70 Channel 83.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 70 74 68 1900 69 Channel 633.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 92 162.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Industrial 4 7 65 63 8 4250 64/2 land 194.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Industrial 5 7 65 63 8 9100 64/4 land 19.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Industrial 6 7 64 11 9 4100 8/1A land 272.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Industrial 7 7 64 11 9 4600 8/1B land 195.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Industrial 8 5 9 12 3 3450 10/1A land 253.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Industrial 9 5 9 12 3 3800 10/1B land 479.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 Industrial 5 9 12 3 4850 0 10/5 land 291.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 Industrial 4 10 12 4400 1 3/1 land 339.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 Industrial 4 10 12 5850 2 3/2 land 236.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

40 1 Industrial

3 2 land 44.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1 Industrial

4 15 land 376.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0

Total 0.00 Note: As per Tamilnadu Government guideline value for chennai zone, Manali Village(year 2004)

41

Annexure 4.3 : Land Acquisition Schedule

Name of Village : Ariyalur Taluk : Ambattur District : Thiruvallur

Boundaries If more than 20% of the land acquired Computed Max.co Total Acquire Sl. Survey Ownership of guide line mpensat area d Area No. No. Land value for ion @ Nor (Sqm) (Sq.m) year 2007- 150% of 9% stamp Total East South West th 08 @ 7% guidelin Rehabilit Mainten Shiftin Rate of duty & Land per e value ation ance g Land registrati compen year (Rs./Sq.f grant allowanc allowan compens on sation (Rs./Sq.ft) t) (Rs.) e(Rs.) ce(Rs.) ation (Rs) cost(Rs.) cost(Rs) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Annammal 1 61 53 (Balaraman & 10200 62/5 others) 207.15 1.25 1.88 4164.90 374.84 4539.74 2 62/9 61 53 C. Balaraman 350 98.07 2.49 3.74 241.85 12000.00 1000.00 3943.54 354.92 17540.31 S.P.Soundarara 3 55 62 52 5300 53/1B j 155.61 17.04 25.56 42813.16 3853.18 46666.34 4 53/4 Sivalingham 1600 207.58 17.04 25.56 57111.73 5140.06 62251.79 5 51/4 50 52 30 Vandi pathai 550 14.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 30/4A 31 51 29 Sivalingham 3950 100.67 2.03 3.05 3302.39 297.22 3599.61 7 30/4B 31 51 29 Sivalingham 9300 479.73 2.03 3.05 15737.11 1416.34 17153.45 8 29/2 30 28 C. Elumalai 3500 1028.38 0.66 0.99 2536.09 12000.00 1000.00 10882.28 979.41 27397.77 9 29/4 30 28 V. Udhaya nath 12000 1986.30 0.66 0.99 21018.96 1891.71 22910.67 10 167/1 166 20 158 Grama natham 12500 69.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11 167/3 166 20 158 channel 20220 764.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12 20 19 21 167 channel 4450 373.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13 19/3 13 18 22 20 Lake 600 140.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

42 P.C.Chendraraj 469759.0 14 123 122 166 164 7050 165/1 an 969.69 27.53 41.29 430971.59 38787.44 3 15 165/2 123 122 166 164 Burial Ground 4000 22.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Chandrasekar, 16 118 120 126 105 Ramasubraman 2800 119/4 ian 27.87 40.63 60.95 18285.01 1645.65 19930.66 17 119/5 118 120 126 105 A.moorthy 2550 63.30 1.97 2.95 2009.52 180.86 2190.38 V. 18 118 120 126 105 2650 119/6 Thulukkanam 35.79 4.39 6.59 2537.48 228.37 2765.85

19 102 93 131 132 1000 103/6 channel 466.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ramesh 20 102 93 131 132 babu,T.Parvathi 5300 35.33 103/7a ammal 18.35 27.53 10468.11 942.13 11410.24 Ramesh 21 102 93 131 132 babu,T.Parvathi 53.35 103/7b ammal 18.35 27.53 15807.34 1422.66 17230.00 22 129/3 130 127 137 132 Govt.land 1800 501.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 725345.84 Note: As per Tamilnadu Government guideline value for chennai zone, Ariyalur Village(year 2004)

43

Annexure 4.4 : Land Acquisition Schedule

Name of Village : Vilangadupakkam Taluk : Ambattur District : Thiruvallur

If more than 20% of the land Boundaries acquired Max.com Acquir Computed pensatio Total Sl. Surve Ownership of ed guide line n @ area No. y No. Nor Land Area value for 150% of 9% stamp East South West (Sqm) th (Sq.m) year 2007-08 guideline Rehabilit Mainten Rate of duty & Total Land @ 7% per value ation ance Shifting Land registrati compensa year (Rs./Sq.ft grant(Rs. allowan allowanc compens on tion (Rs./Sq.ft) ) ) ce(Rs.) e(Rs.) ation (Rs) cost(Rs.) cost(Rs) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

1 419 421 425 423 422/5 Prema 150 5.35 32.77 49.15 2830.68 254.76 3085.44 2 419 421 425 423 422/16 Jagadeeswari 150 54.02 32.77 49.15 28581.89 2572.37 31154.26 3 419 421 425 423 422/1a Rathnavelu 5450 573.6 32.77 49.15 303490.83 27314.17 330805.00 4 419 421 425 423 422/6 19.39 32.77 49.15 10259.22 923.33 11182.55 5 412 418 394 395 396 Grama natham 14950 193.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 398 412 396 395 397 Vandhi pathi 2150 25.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 386/2 395 387 384 357 A Elumalai 900 56.44 38.01 57.02 34640.28 3117.63 37757.91 8 356 357 377 359 358 Annamalai 2050 31.15 28.84 43.26 14503.64 1305.33 15808.97

44 9 355 358 370 360 Chandrakantha 359 mmal 2000 142.31 43.26 64.88 99390.71 8945.16 108335.87 10 351 355 368 364 361/1 45.81 2.70 4.05 1997.21 179.75 2176.96 11 351 355 368 364 361/2 38.81 2.70 4.05 1692.03 152.28 1844.31 12 351 355 368 364 361/3 Vandi pathai 200 142.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13 361/D/ 351 355 368 364 3 42.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14 343 346 348 341 Srinivasa 342/2 Perumal koil 13250 63.63 27.53 41.29 28279.89 2545.19 30825.08

Total 572976.35 Note: As per Tamilnadu Government guideline value for chennai zone, Vilangadupakkam Village(year 2004)

45 Annexure 5 : Public Consultation

Venue : Andarkuppam Date : 29/08/05, 4.00 PM

On completion of Socio-Economic Survey and after identifying the number of families being affected, Public consultation was held on 29.08.2005 at 5.00 p.m. in the Panchayat Union Middle School, Andarkuppam.

The public consultation conducted on 29.08.2005 by the ADE (H) Saidapet, HD also served as a platform to disclose the details of LA and Structures affected to the PAPs. Large number of Project Affected Persons (PAPs) covered under the survey attended the meeting. Participants also included village heads and interested general public. The ADE (H) briefed the audience about the proposed project and explained the purpose of conducting the public consultation. The details of impact anticipated, the compensation likely to be made available and the options available to PAPs were explained. The following issues and public opinion as below surfaced in the meeting. Residents from Andarkuppam village informed that the existing land owned by Highways Department on the left side of the project road from km 0/0 to 1/0 should be considered before acquiring private land for proposed road widening. PAPs of Andarkuppam village confirmed that they have encroached and staying on the government land and are willing to relocate. Provision should be made in the estimate for shifting the existing Panchayat water pipe line for the proposed road widening. President and members of the concerned Panchayats requested for the fund allotment in the TNUDP project to repair the panchayat assets, which would get damaged during road construction. Also they have requested that a complete copy of the land acquisition particulars of concerned villages shall be made available for reference PAPs were apprehensive about the compensation they would be given by the Government. They expressed their views that compensation should be fair and should be disbursed in time. Villagers expressed their happiness and welcomed the initiative of Highways department for having conducted the Stake holder meeting with complete details of the proposed project for having given the opportunity to express their suggestions and opinion.

Public Consultation - Attendance sheet Venue : Andarkuppam Date : 29/08/05, 4.00 PM

47 Annexure 6 : Monitoring Indicator Format

A. Monitoring Indicators for Physical Progress (Sub-Project Wise) Sl. Monitoring Implementati Achieved till Progress Cumulative Remarks No. Indicators for on Target Last Month this Month Progress Physical Progress TH NTH TH NTH TH NTH TH NTH 1.0 Land Acquisition (Area in Ha) 1 Govt Land. 0.77 2 Other Land 0.0063 3 Private Land (No. of 0.63 PAHs) (25) 2.0 Structures 2.1 Area of structure - 297 aquired (sq.m) from private owners 2.2 No. of PAHs paid - 19 compensation for acquisition of Structures 2.3 Other assets (wells) - - acquired (no. ) from private owners 2.4 No. of PAHs paid 3 compensation for acquisition of Other assets Structures 3.0 R&R Assistance 3.1 No. of PAHs - 19 provided with shifting allowance 3.2 No. of PAHs - provided with rental allowance 3.3 No. of PAHs - 19 provided with subsistence allowance for 6 months 3.4 No. of PAHs - - provided with subsistence allowance (employees) for 3 months 3.5 No. of Vulnerable - - PAHs provided with alternate built house (if any) 3.6 No. of Vulnerable - - PAHs provided with alternate built shop (if any) 4.0 Community Assets Reestablished 4.1 community Properties 4.2 Utility Assets 5.0 Manpower Deployment

48 5.1 No. of staff in LA activities in position 5.2 No. of staff in R&R activities in position 5.3 No. of implementing NGO staff in position Note: TH denotes Title holder and NTH denotes Non title holder Other Land Includes Temple land, etc Community properties include place of worship, playground, graveyard, etc Utility assets include water taps, bus shelter, hand pumps, etc

49 Annexure - 6

B. Monitoring Indicators for Financial Progress (Sub-Project Wise) Sl. Monitoring Implementation Achieved till Progress Cumulative Remark No. Indicators for Target Last Month this Month Progress s Physical Progress TH NTH TH NTH TH NTH TH NTH 1.0 Land Acquisition (nos) 1 Govt Land. - Compensation paid 2 Other Land 1 Compensation paid 3 compensation for 25 Pvt land properties : No. of PAHs 2.0 Structures 2.1 No. of PAHs paid - 19 compensation for acquisition of Structures paid 2.2 Other assets (wells) - - aquired (no. ) from private owners paid 2.3 No. of PAHs paid 1 2 compensation for acquisition of Other assets Structures paid 3.0 R&R Assistance 3.1 No. of PAHs provide - 19 with shifting allowance paid 3.2 No. of PAHs - - provided with rental allowance paid 3.3 No. of PAHs - 19 provided with subsistence allowance for 6 months paid 3.4 No. of PAHs - - provided with subsistence allowance (employees) for 3 months paid 3.5 Expenditure on - - providing alternate built house Vulnerable PAHs provided (if any) 3.6 Expenditure on - - providing alternate shops (if any) 4.0 Community Assets Reestablishment cost (civil works cost) 4.1 community - Properties spent 4.2 Utility Assets spent - 5.0 Manpower Deployment

50 Expenditure on Staffing of PIU (salary) Expenditure on engaging implementing NGOs Expenditure on engaging Impact evaluation consultant Expenditure on Public consultation Expenditure on Unquantified impacts (10%of R&R cost) Note: TH denotes Title holder and NTH denotes Non title holder Other Land Includes Temple land, etc Community properties include place of worship, playground, graveyard, etc Utility assets include water taps, bus shelter, hand pumps, etc

51 Annexure - 6 C. Key baseline socio-economic indicators for Impact Evaluation Impact Evaluation Indicators Pre- Annual End of the Project Evaluation Project Value Evaluation (baseline value) 1. Income Proportion of PAHs below Poverty Lane 45% Proportion of PAHs above Poverty Lane 55% Average Annual Income Rs.29400 Average Monthly Per-capita Income Rs.746 Average Monthly Per-capita Expenditure - Average No. of Earners Per Household 2 2. Occupation Proportion of land based occupation 21% Proportion of non- land based occupation 11% Proportion of self employed 25% Proportion of salaried 0% 3. Land Holding Proportion of agri holding below 1 acre - Proportion of agriholding 1.1 to 2 acres - Proportion of agri holding 2.1 to 5 acres - More than 5 acres - Average Standard Land holding size - Average yield from different crops - 4. Access to Basic Amenities Proportion of house holds having water supply 0% connection 0% Proportion of house holds having telephone connection Proportion of house holds having close access to 100% community water resource Proportion of other amenities located within 1 km - (PHC/playground/ Park, etc) 5. House type Proportion of house holds having Pucca House 5 % Proportion of house holds having Semi-Pucca House 16 % Proportion of house holds having Kutcha House 79 % 6. Material Assets Average Number of Livestocks per Household (cow, - Buffalo, Goat, Sheep, Poultry Birds, etc) Proportion of households having radio - Proportion of households having mixer 16% Proportion of households having grinder 16% Proportion of households having BW/Colour Television 40% Proportion of households having mobile phone 20% Proportion of households having cattle - Proportion of households having two wheelers 20% Proportion of households having four wheeler 0% Proportion of households having water supply 0% connection 0% Proportion of households having telephone connection Note: The external Impact Evaluation consultant may add or delete suitable indicators. However, all pre- project baseline values will be provided to the consultant or will be collected during implementation on recall basis.

52 Annexure 7 : RIP Implementation Schedule - Gantt Chart

Ariyalur Vilangadupakkam Road - Km 0/0 - 6/4 Gantt Chart

Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 Activity No. Task Name W1 W2 W3 W4 W5 W6 W7 W8 W9 W10 W11 W12 W13 W14 W15 W16 W17 W18 W19 W20 RIP Implementation Schedule Administrative Sanction 1 PIU internal proceedings /Technical Sanction 2 Disclosure of RIP 3 Constitution of NGO,GRC, Data base 4 Peg Marking / defining Corridor of Impact 5 Validation of Project Affected Persons 6 Notification of Land Acquisition Relocation of Community Assets including 7 Reimbursement Issue of Identity Cards & Invitation Letter to 8 PAPs 9 Negotiations

12 Payment of LA Compensation

13 Disbursement of Entitlement

14 Processing of Relocation/Resettlement 15 Impact Assessment after implementation To commence after six monthsof completion of RIP

Activity No.1 will commence from the date of obtaining Administrative sanction Task Milestone Summary

Appendix I : Entitlement Matrix: This matrix is an extract from the ESF document (Oct 2006 ). This is for information only and the ESF as updated to be referred for prevailing / applicable parameters

Sl. Type of Loss Application Definition of Entitlement Framework No Entitled person 1.1 Land Less than 20% of Legal user with -Cash compensation at the Replacement Cost for the extent of land lost (agriculture land holding* valid title or (Ref Note 1) Land) lost and residual customary or land remains usufruct rights. economically Tenant/ -No compensation against land. viable Lease holder / -For loss of income a lump sum subsistence allowance of (marginal Share Cropper Rs.12,000. impact on Squatters/ -Squatters and encroachers will not be entitled to compensation for the loss livelihood) Encroachers of land More than 20% Legal user with -Land for land of on the basis of replacement land (1 ha of dry land or ½ ha of land holding valid title or of wetland for 1 ha of dry land lost), up to a maximum of 3.00 ha of dry land lost, or where less customary or and 1.5 ha of wetland. The purchase price will be negotiated between the than 20% lost but usufruct rights willing seller and willing PAP (Ref Note 2). The project will bear registration remaining land charges in addition to compensation for land. becomes Or economically Cash compensation at the Replacement cost for the entire land holding unviable (severe (Ref Note 1&2) impact on household -For loss of income PAFs will receive a rehabilitation grant (adjusted for income and inflation every year by the TNUDP) of Rs. 24,661/- per ha of dry land lost or Rs. living standards) 41,420/- per ha of wetland lost, up to a maximum of 3.00 ha of dry land and 1.5 ha of wetland. -Maintenance allowance for 12 months at Rs. 1000/month per PAF -One time shifting allowance of Rs.1,000/- -Compensation for any affected fixed structure on the land at replacement cost and right to salvage building material

54 *Land holding refers to the land plot directly impacted by the project and does not include any other land holdings that a PAP may own at other locations.

Tenant/ -No compensation for affected land Lease holder / -Maintenance allowance for 12 months at Rs. 1000/month per PAF Share Cropper -One time shifting allowance of Rs.1,000/- Squatters -No compensation for loss of land -For loss of incomes, a subsistence allowance for 3 months equivalent to monthly minimum wages as per prevailing rates of GoTN. -One time shifting allowance of Rs. 1000/- 1.2 Loss of part of PAPs with valid -Cash compensation for affected portion of land at replacement cost. Residential / land holding title or (Ref Note 1) Commercial with remaining customary and Land land more than usufruct right the minimum Tenants and -Reimbursement to leaseholders for un-expired lease period limited to 12 required under leaseholders months the zoning -Transition allowance equivalent to two months income. regulations Squatters/ -No compensation for loss of land Encroachers -Transition allowance equivalent to two month‟s income Entire loss of land PAPs with valid -An equivalent area of land with access to services and facilities at least of holding or title or same level as affected land and at location acceptable to PAP. The project where partial loss customary and will identify the land and the purchase price will be negotiated between the but the usufruct right willing seller and the willing PAP. The project will bear registration charges. remaining land (See Note 2) becomes Or unviable or too Cash compensation for entire land holding at replacement cost small (Ref Note 1) (PAP is required -One time shifting allowance of Rs. 1,000/- to relocate)

55 Tenants and Leaseholders will be entitled to: Leaseholders -An equivalent area of land with access to services and facilities at least of same level as affected land and at location acceptable to PAP Or Cash compensation as reimbursement for un-expired lease period limited to 12 months -One time shifting allowance of Rs. 1,000/- Tenants will be entitled to: -Allowance equivalent to six months rental value -One time shifting allowance of Rs. 1,000/- Squatters/ -No compensation for loss of land Encroachers -One time shifting allowance of Rs. 1,000/- 2. Structures/ 2.1 Partially Legal user with -Cash compensation at replacement cost for affected area of structure Buildings affected and valid title calculated based on PWD scheduled rates without depreciation (Residential, remaining -Repair cost for restoration of remaining structure Commercial, structures viable -Right to salvage material Industrial or for continued Owner of -Cash compensation at replacement cost for affected area of structure Institutional) use structure calculated based on PWD scheduled rates without depreciation without legal -Repair cost for restoration of remaining structure title -Right to salvage material (squatters)

Encroacher Right to salvage material

56 2.2 Fully affected Legal owner with -Cash compensation at replacement cost for the affected unit, calculated or where part valid title based on the PWD scheduled rates, without depreciation plus house/shop structure building allowance equivalent to 25% of compensation. affected but or remaining For PAFs losing upto 20 sq.m of house will get a built house of 20 sq.m. and structure PAFs losing house of more than 20 sq.m will get a built house of 40 sq.m, rendered where possible. unviable In case of Shops and business, an alternate built shop, where possible, in the resettlement site (resettlement site will be developed provided not less than 20 units opt to move into a particular resettlement site) of plinth area of 9 Sq.m. (The cost of unit to be charged to the PAF is limited to two-thirds to non- vulnerable and one-third to vulnerable subject to maximum of compensation amount received) -Subsistence Allowance for 6 months equivalent to monthly minimum wages for unskilled casual laborers -One time shifting allowance of Rs.1,000/- -Right to salvage material. Tenant/ -Subsistence allowance for 6 months at equivalent rental value Lease holder -One time shifting allowance of Rs.1,000/- -Right to salvage material if any additions done by the tenant

57 Squatter -Cash compensation at replacement cost for the affected unit, calculated based on the scheduled rates of the PWD without depreciation, plus house/shop building allowance equivalent to 25% of compensation. or PAFs losing upto 20 sq.m of house will get a built house of 20 sq.m. and PAFs losing a house of more than 20 sq.m will get a built house of 40 sq.m. where possible. In case of Shops and business an alternate built shop, in a resettlement site (resettlement site will be developed provided not less than 20 units opt to move into a particular resettlement site) of plinth area of 9 Sq.m. (The cost of unit to be charged is limited to two-thirds to non-vulnerable and one third to vulnerable subject to maximum of compensation amount received) -Subsistence Allowance for 6 months equivalent to monthly minimum wages -One time shifting allowance of Rs.1,000/- -Right to salvage material. Encroacher -Compensation at replacement cost for affected portion of structures -Right to salvage material 3 Loss of 3.1 Loss of PAPs -Subsistence Allowance for 3 months equivalent of monthly minimum income / employment of wages for unskilled casual laborer as per prevailing rates of GoTN Livelihood agricultural laborer 3.2 Loss of rental Owner of -If rental income derived from building is declared and records of Income income from affected Tax returns are available, then a cash grant equivalent to one year income building building calculated as an average of past three years income or -Subsistence allowance for 12 months at equivalent rental value

58 3.3 Loss of Owner of -If business income is declared and records of Income Tax returns are income from Business available, then a cash grant equivalent to one year income calculated as trade/busine an average of past three years income ss or If business income details are not available, then a cash grant equivalent to 365 days of minimum wages (minimum wages are fixed by the respective District Collector in accordance with Minimum wages fixed by Ministry of Labor under Minimum Wages Act, 1948. Rates will be revised by TNUDP every year) Employees -One time maintenance allowance / cash grant equivalent to 90 days of (Identified minimum wages (minimum wages are fixed by the respective District during Baseline Collector in accordance with Minimum wages fixed by Ministry of Labor Survey on cut under Minimum Wages Act, 1948. Rates will be revised by TNUDP every year) off date) Hawker -Compensation for temporary Loss by way of one time shifting allowance of (Identified Rs. 1000/- Lump Sum maximum. Shifting allowance to commensurate the during Baseline need. Survey on cut -Subsistence allowance for the number of days equivalent to the actual loss off date) of business income calculated as per applicable minimum wages 4 Loss of Standing Cultivator -Advance Notice of 3 months to harvest crop Crops (Title holder / or Tenant / -Cash compensation equivalent to market value of standing crop lost. Lease holder / Share Cropper / Squatter 5 Loss of access to The affected common resources will be provided / created afresh a) Common 1) Wherever possible, the property will be relocated in consultation with the resources community b)Social and Cultural property 2) When relocation of the property is not feasible, will be provided afresh 6 Loss of Amenities and -Affected host communities will be entitled to restoration of losses as a result Amenities / Services of additional consumption due to resettlement Services to host -Will be provided amenities/services equivalent to those provided to PAPs.

59 communities 7. Unidentified Unforeseen impacts will be documented and mitigated based on the Impacts provisions of the policy

Notes: 1. Procedure for acquisition / negotiation and quantum of compensation as per guidelines in the ESF document shall apply. 2. Land for land of equivalent extent as per guidelines in the ESF document shall apply. Where land-for-land of equivalent production capacity or other attributes is not available at locations acceptable to the PAPs, cash compensation may be provided at the informed request of the PAPs. 3. The compensation for homestead land including the built-up area will be governed as per provision under Sr.no:1 : „land‟ 4. Based on Consumer Price Index for agricultural laborers for Tamil Nadu – Sep 2003, Index 362

60