DOCSLIB.ORG

Auger Line Shapes in Solids

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Auger Line Shapes in Solids Auger Line Shapes in Solids Pierre Victor Auger (1899-1993) who discovered the law of the Auger effect in 1925 who discovered the Auger effect in 1923 1 Core-levels observed in photoemission are resonances and width is large for high binding energies Core-levels observed in photoemission are resonances and width is large for high binding energies Fe1s binding energy=7112 eV Width > 5 eV Decay mechanisms: X-ray emission, Auger electron emission. Auger electrons are seen by the ESCA apparatus along with photoelectrons. Their energies are independent of the photon energy. X ray notation level Ks1 1/2 Ls12 1/2 Lp22 1/2 Lp32 3/2 Ms13 1/2 Mp23 1/2 Mp33 3/2 Md43 3/2 Md53 5/2 Ns14 1/2 Np24 1/2 Np34 3/2 Nd44 1/2 Nd54 3/2 Nf64 5/2 Nf74 7/2 Meitner-Auger Effect and Spectroscopy An important spectroscopy is based on the Auger Effect. Actually, this effect was first reported in 1923 in Zeitschrift für Physik by the Austrian Physicist Lise Meitner (1878-1968). In 1925, the great French physicist Pierre Auger (1899- 1993) rediscovered the effect while investigating in a bubble chamber the emission of an electron from an atom that absorbs a X-ray photon, that is, photoemission. The photoelectrons have kinetic energy Ek = hν − EB, where EB is one of the binding energies of the atom inner levels. However the Auger electrons have ν-indepedent energies given approximately by the empirical Auger law. BBB EAuger ( )=E ( ) - E ( ) -E ( ) 7 Pierre Victor Auger (1899-1993) X-rays of adequate energy produce a primary hole in the state of binding energy of EB() and a photoelectron; since the ion with a core hole is unstable, the primary holes is filled up by an electron in a less bound level β, and the energy gained in the process is taken by an electron in level γ, than is emitted as the Auger electron. For particular transition to happen, it is necessary that the primary hole is deep enough (its binding energy must exceed the sum of those of and c). BBB EAuger ( )=E ( ) - E ( ) -E ( ) 8 The Auger transitions are denoted by the spectroscopic symbols of the shells (or, more precisely, sub-shells) involved: thus a KL1M2 transition is due to a primary hole in the K shell that decays leaving in the final state L1 and M2 holes and an Auger electron. M2 L1 K One speaks about Core-Core-Core, Core-Valence-Valence, etc.,transitions depending on the levels that are involved. The Auger effect is caused by the Coulomb interaction: two electrons of the system collide and while one fills up the primary hole, the other is shot out as the Auger electron. The energy of the primary-hole state is shared between the Auger electron and the ion left behind. 9 AES=Auger Electron Spectrum of Cd vapor (Z=48) X ray notation level Ks1 1/2 Ls12 1/2 M4 initial hole Lp22 1/2 Lp32 3/2 N4,5 final holes Ms13 1/2 Mp23 1/2 Mp33 3/2 Md43 3/2 Md53 5/2 Ns14 1/2 Np24 1/2 Np34 3/2 Nd44 1/2 Nd54 3/2 Nf64 5/2 Nf74 7/2 11 KL11 M Auger transition in the electron picture: L11 M K k the other electrons are (approximately) spectators 12 KL11 M Auger transition in the hole picture is simplest: K k L11 M hole k is in continuum 13 X decay is faster when the involved levels are distant in energy, because of the n3 factor in the transition probability due to the density of photon final states. The Auger decay prevails if the states , and are near in energy Auger is the dominant for inner shell holes of light atoms, while in heavy ones X decay is much more likely Wentzel (1927 ) theory: transition Primary holes final holes Primary holes: deep level α and free state k final holes : the spin-orbitals β and γ Two-step model: the photoemission process produces ion in its meta-stable ground state- Deep hole creation and Auger decay are disjoint processes . 15 Wentzel (1927 ) theory: transition Mechanism: the smoking gun The Auger transition is a Coulomb collision between two holes and is an energy conserving process. (in reality the other electrons are also involved in some way) In the hole picture, the initial state |Φi > and the final state |Φf > of the atom are represented by 2 × 2 Slater determinants; they have the same energy and are coupled by the Coulomb interaction. In a KLM transition, involving s states, |Φi >=Det|y1syk| --> |Φf >=Det|y2sy3s| 2 2 Rate by Fermi golden rule PHif| i C f | . 16 An alternative mechanism : internal photoemission M M2 2 hn L L1 1 K K One of electrons in the upper states β, γ could fill up the deep hole via a normal radiative process, emitting a X-ray photon; this photon could then cause the photoemission of the other electron. Would’nt the final state be the same? Indeed, this alternative process does exist, and has the name of internal photoemission; unlike the Auger effect, it obeys optical selection rules. The transition probability of the internal photoemission can be calculated by perturbation theory, but since it is a second-order process in A.P it turns out to be quite small compared to the Auger effect. 17 Atomic Auger Selection Rules 2 Conserved quantities in the transition: energy, J , Jz and parity . Actually parity conservation is violated but the effect is too small to be of any importance in Auger spectroscopy. 2 Selection rules arise in the two-step model from the conservation of J , Jz and parity between the initial, core-hole state and the final state including the Auger electron. 2 2 In the L-S approximation, L , Lz and S , Sz are also conserved, while in the jj scheme, the states are labeled by the j quantum numbers. 18 Atomic Auger Selection Rules KLL transitions If the spin-orbit interaction is more important than the Coulomb interaction, as in high Z elements, the jj scheme applies. If the Coulomb interaction dominates, the LSMLMS scheme is OK. The pure jj scheme one would predict 6 transitions, namely, KL1L1,KL1L2, KL1L3,KL2L2,KL2L3, and KL3L3. L3 L 3 L3 L L 3 L3 3 L2 L 2 L2 L L 2 L2 2 L1 L 1 L1 L L 1 L1 1 K K K K K K 19 In the pure LS scheme, the possible final states are 5: 2s22p4 3P is forbidden by 0 6 1 22s p S parity conservation; indeed, the primary hole has L=0 2 4 3 1 and is even, 2s 2p P is 15 P even and has L=1 ; by L 22sp 3 P allowed conservation the Auger electron must be in a p state, which is odd.Hence 1S the final state is odd. 2 4 3 22s p P The transition to the odd 1 D 2s12p5 3P atomic final state is allowed, and one predicts 5 lines. LS terms split by Coulomb interaction 20 Dependence of atomic levels on coupling scheme for 2 electrons of p type When the spin-orbit interaction is introduced, in intermediate coupling the forbidden final-state splits : 2 4 3 3 3 3 2s 2p P → P2, P1, P0; 3 then, states with the same j and different spin mix: P2 mixes with 1 3 1 2 4 D2 and P0 mixes with S0 from the same 2s 2p configuration. Now the decay can occur with d or s Auger electrons. 1 3 2 4 1 S j0 from P0 2s 2p S mixed parity 33 2 4 3 P j1 from P even and J=1 22s p P 1 3 2 4 1 1 j2 from P22 2s 2p D mixed parity D 3 P1 even and J=1 requires Auger electron in even state with J=1 forbidden 22 3 2 4 1 3 3 1 j0 from P 2s 2p S mixed parity P2 and P0 become S more and more allowed as Z0 grows. 33 2 4 3 P j1 from P even and J=1 22s p P 1 Instead, 3P remains purely P and forbidden (as3 long as 2 one 4 1can neglect 1 1 j2 from P22 2s 2p D mixed parity the mixing with higherD configurations). Thus, the number of lines grows to 9. 3 0 6 1 AllowedP1 evenAuger andtransitions J=1 requires Auger electron2s 2in p even S state, with J=1 forbidden in intermediate coupling 1 5 1 3 3 3 2s 2 p P2, P 0 , P 1, P 2 , 2s2 2 p 4 1 S, 3P , 3 P , 1 D 0 0 2 2 23 Core-Valence-Valence transitions in solids: Lander independent-particle theory Level scheme E k kinetic energy of Auger electron k vacuum level 1 =binding energyof level 1= electron jumps to free state energyof hole in level 1 NE()() k k BZ Auger law: 1 = ck12 2 core-hole 2 valence holes+Auger electrons electron jumps to core Auger spectrum: C ck(12 )= Auger energy 24 CVV transitions in solids: Lander theory (1953) Level scheme ck( 12 )= Auger electron energy E All hole pairs such that 12 k vacuum level contribute to spectrum at kc . electron jumps to free state Auger intensity 2 I( ) | M | d 1 N ( 1 ) N ( 1 ) NE()() k k BZ M Wentzel's matrix element 1 2 Density of final hole states electron jumps to core d N()() N 1 1 1 C self-convolution of N NB in Lander theory the holes are created in Bloch stetes 25 Powell, prl (1973) stressed that spectra can be atomic-like or band-like 26 Milano 4 Luglio 2006 S.P.Kowalczyk et al.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Direct Evidence for Low-Energy Electron Emission Following O LVV
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Direct evidence for low‑energy electron emission following O LVV Auger transitions at oxide surfaces Alexander J. Fairchild1*, Varghese A. Chirayath1*, Philip A. Sterne2, Randall W. Gladen1, Ali R. Koymen1 & Alex H. Weiss1 Oxygen, the third most abundant element in the universe, plays a key role in the chemistry of condensed matter and biological systems. Here, we report evidence for a hitherto unexplored Auger transition in oxides, where a valence band electron flls a vacancy in the 2s state of oxygen, transferring sufcient energy to allow electron emission. We used a beam of positrons with kinetic energies of ∼ 1 eV to create O 2s holes via matter‑antimatter annihilation. This made possible the elimination of the large secondary electron background that has precluded defnitive measurements of the low‑energy electrons emitted through this process. Our experiments indicate that low‑energy electron emission following the Auger decay of O 2s holes from adsorbed oxygen and oxide surfaces are very efcient. Specifcally, our results indicate that the low energy electron emission following the Auger decay of O 2s hole is nearly as efcient as electron emission following the relaxation of O 1s holes in TiO2 . This has important implications for the understanding of Auger‑stimulated ion desorption, Coulombic decay, photodynamic cancer therapies, and may yield important insights into the radiation‑induced reactive sites for corrosion and catalysis. Low-energy electrons are involved in nearly all of the chemical and biological phenomena underlying radiation chemistry playing a central role, for example, in the radiation-induced damage of DNA 1 and possibly the origins of life itself2.
    [Show full text]
  • Charge Transfer to Ground-State Ions Produces Free Electrons
    ARTICLE Received 14 Jun 2016 | Accepted 9 Dec 2016 | Published 30 Jan 2017 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14277 OPEN Charge transfer to ground-state ions produces free electrons D. You1,2, H. Fukuzawa1,2, Y. Sakakibara1,2, T. Takanashi1,2,Y.Ito1,2, G.G. Maliyar1,2, K. Motomura1,2, K. Nagaya2,3, T. Nishiyama2,3, K. Asa2,3, Y. Sato2,3, N. Saito2,4, M. Oura2, M. Scho¨ffler2,5, G. Kastirke5, U. Hergenhahn6,7, V. Stumpf8, K. Gokhberg8, A.I. Kuleff8, L.S. Cederbaum8 & K. Ueda1,2 Inner-shell ionization of an isolated atom typically leads to Auger decay. In an environment, for example, a liquid or a van der Waals bonded system, this process will be modified, and becomes part of a complex cascade of relaxation steps. Understanding these steps is important, as they determine the production of slow electrons and singly charged radicals, the most abundant products in radiation chemistry. In this communication, we present experi- mental evidence for a so-far unobserved, but potentially very important step in such relaxation cascades: Multiply charged ionic states after Auger decay may partially be neutralized by electron transfer, simultaneously evoking the creation of a low-energy free electron (electron transfer-mediated decay). This process is effective even after Auger decay into the dicationic ground state. In our experiment, we observe the decay of Ne2 þ produced after Ne 1s photoionization in Ne–Kr mixed clusters. 1 Institute of Multidisciplinary Research for Advanced Materials, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8577, Japan. 2 RIKEN SPring-8 Center, Kouto 1-1-1, Sayo, Hyogo 679-5148, Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • Valence-Valence and M5-Valence- Valence Auger Spectra Determined by Auger- Photoelectron Coincidence Spectroscopy M.T
    2-38 CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS SCIENCE HIGHLIGHTS 2-39 Palladium M4-Valence-Valence and M5-Valence- Valence Auger Spectra Determined by Auger- Photoelectron Coincidence Spectroscopy M.T. Butterfield1, R.A. Bartynski1, and S.L. Hulbert2 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University; 2National Synchrotron Light Source, Brookhaven National Laboratory One of the best ways to probe electron correlations in the valence band of solids is to compare spectra of Auger decay processes with the predictions of various theories. But Auger spectra associated with different core levels are often closely spaced in energy and cannot be resolved by conventional means. Scientists from the NSLS and Rutgers University have recently succeeded in isolating the overlapping M4-valence-valence and M5-valence-valence Auger spectra of palladium metal by using vacuum ultraviolet synchrotron radiation from NSLS beamline U16B and a novel end station with two electron energy analyzers. One common way to probe the electronic structure of transition metals is through a mechanism called the Auger effect, which works as follows: An electron from a core electronic shell inside a metal atom is ejected by incoming radiation, leaving a vacant site, or Authors (from left): Martin Butterfield, Robert hole, which is subsequently filled by another Bartynski, and Steven Hulbert electron coming from a valence electronic shell (of higher energy than the core shell). By jumping into the hole, this second electron loses energy, which is then used to eject a third electron from another valence shell, called an Auger electron (Figure 1). Scientists can count the Auger electrons ejected as a function of their kinetic energy, called the Auger electron spectrum, which provides information on the corre- lations between the two holes left in the valence shell by the second and third electrons.
    [Show full text]
  • Sterns Lebensdaten Und Chronologie Seines Wirkens
    Sterns Lebensdaten und Chronologie seines Wirkens Diese Chronologie von Otto Sterns Wirken basiert auf folgenden Quellen: 1. Otto Sterns selbst verfassten Lebensläufen, 2. Sterns Briefen und Sterns Publikationen, 3. Sterns Reisepässen 4. Sterns Züricher Interview 1961 5. Dokumenten der Hochschularchive (17.2.1888 bis 17.8.1969) 1888 Geb. 17.2.1888 als Otto Stern in Sohrau/Oberschlesien In allen Lebensläufen und Dokumenten findet man immer nur den VornamenOt- to. Im polizeilichen Führungszeugnis ausgestellt am 12.7.1912 vom königlichen Polizeipräsidium Abt. IV in Breslau wird bei Stern ebenfalls nur der Vorname Otto erwähnt. Nur im Emeritierungsdokument des Carnegie Institutes of Tech- nology wird ein zweiter Vorname Otto M. Stern erwähnt. Vater: Mühlenbesitzer Oskar Stern (*1850–1919) und Mutter Eugenie Stern geb. Rosenthal (*1863–1907) Nach Angabe von Diana Templeton-Killan, der Enkeltochter von Berta Kamm und somit Großnichte von Otto Stern (E-Mail vom 3.12.2015 an Horst Schmidt- Böcking) war Ottos Großvater Abraham Stern. Abraham hatte 5 Kinder mit seiner ersten Frau Nanni Freund. Nanni starb kurz nach der Geburt des fünften Kindes. Bald danach heiratete Abraham Berta Ben- der, mit der er 6 weitere Kinder hatte. Ottos Vater Oskar war das dritte Kind von Berta. Abraham und Nannis erstes Kind war Heinrich Stern (1833–1908). Heinrich hatte 4 Kinder. Das erste Kind war Richard Stern (1865–1911), der Toni Asch © Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland 2018 325 H. Schmidt-Böcking, A. Templeton, W. Trageser (Hrsg.), Otto Sterns gesammelte Briefe – Band 1, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55735-8 326 Sterns Lebensdaten und Chronologie seines Wirkens heiratete.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiative Auger Effect and Extended X-Ray Emission Fine Structure (EXEFS)
    ANALYTICAL SCIENCES JULY 2005, VOL. 21 733 2005 © The Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry Reviews Radiative Auger Effect and Extended X-Ray Emission Fine Structure (EXEFS) Jun KAWAI Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606–8501, Japan Radiative Auger spectra are weak X-ray emission spectra near the characteristic X-ray lines. Radiative Auger process is an intrinsic energy-loss process in an atom when a characteristic X-ray photon is emitted, due to an atomic many-body effect. The energy loss spectra correspond to the unoccupied conduction band structure of materials. Therefore the radiative Auger effect is an alternative tool to the X-ray absorption spectroscopy such as EXAFS (Extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure) and XANES (X-ray Absorption Near Edge Structure), and thus it is named EXEFS (Extended X-ray Emission Fine Structure). By the use of a commercially available X-ray fluorescence spectrometer or an electron probe microanalyzer (EPMA), which are frequently used in materials industries, we can obtain an EXEFS spectrum within 20 min. The radiative Auger effect, as an example, demonstrates that the study on atomic many-body effects has become a powerful tool for crystal and electronic structure characterizations. The EXEFS method has already been used in many industries in Japan. Reviews about the applications and basic study results on the radiative Auger effect are reported in this paper. (Received December 23, 2004; Accepted March 10, 2005) 1 Introduction 733 3 Progress of EXEFS Method 734 2 EXEFS 734 4 References 735 moment of 1s electron photoionization. 1 Introduction The potential energy function of an atom whose 1s electron is absent due to photoionization is different from that of the same The radiative Auger satellite spectra are observable at the low atom but one of the 2p electrons is absent.
    [Show full text]
  • Physiker-Entdeckungen Und Erdzeiten Hans Ulrich Stalder 31.1.2019
    Physiker-Entdeckungen und Erdzeiten Hans Ulrich Stalder 31.1.2019 Haftungsausschluss / Disclaimer / Hyperlinks Für fehlerhafte Angaben und deren Folgen kann weder eine juristische Verantwortung noch irgendeine Haftung übernommen werden. Änderungen vorbehalten. Ich distanziere mich hiermit ausdrücklich von allen Inhalten aller verlinkten Seiten und mache mir diese Inhalte nicht zu eigen. Erdzeiten Erdzeit beginnt vor x-Millionen Jahren Quartär 2,588 Neogen 23,03 (erste Menschen vor zirka 4 Millionen Jahren) Paläogen 66 Kreide 145 (Dinosaurier) Jura 201,3 Trias 252,2 Perm 298,9 Karbon 358,9 Devon 419,2 Silur 443,4 Ordovizium 485,4 Kambrium 541 Ediacarium 635 Cryogenium 850 Tonium 1000 Stenium 1200 Ectasium 1400 Calymmium 1600 Statherium 1800 Orosirium 2050 Rhyacium 2300 Siderium 2500 Physiker Entdeckungen Jahr 0800 v. Chr.: Den Babyloniern sind Sonnenfinsterniszyklen mit der Sarosperiode (rund 18 Jahre) bekannt. Jahr 0580 v. Chr.: Die Erde wird nach einer Theorie von Anaximander als Kugel beschrieben. Jahr 0550 v. Chr.: Die Entdeckung von ganzzahligen Frequenzverhältnissen bei konsonanten Klängen (Pythagoras in der Schmiede) führt zur ersten überlieferten und zutreffenden quantitativen Beschreibung eines physikalischen Sachverhalts. © Hans Ulrich Stalder, Switzerland Jahr 0500 v. Chr.: Demokrit postuliert, dass die Natur aus Atomen zusammengesetzt sei. Jahr 0450 v. Chr.: Vier-Elemente-Lehre von Empedokles. Jahr 0300 v. Chr.: Euklid begründet anhand der Reflexion die geometrische Optik. Jahr 0265 v. Chr.: Zum ersten Mal wird die Theorie des Heliozentrischen Weltbildes mit geometrischen Berechnungen von Aristarchos von Samos belegt. Jahr 0250 v. Chr.: Archimedes entdeckt das Hebelgesetz und die statische Auftriebskraft in Flüssigkeiten, Archimedisches Prinzip. Jahr 0240 v. Chr.: Eratosthenes bestimmt den Erdumfang mit einer Gradmessung zwischen Alexandria und Syene.
    [Show full text]
  • Ion-Induced Auger Emission from Solid Targets
    Scanning Electron Microscopy Volume 1986 Number 2 Article 3 7-16-1986 Ion-Induced Auger Emission from Solid Targets Josette Mischler Université Paul Sabatier et Institut National des Sciences Appliquées Nicole Benazeth Université Paul Sabatier et Institut National des Sciences Appliquées Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/electron Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Mischler, Josette and Benazeth, Nicole (1986) "Ion-Induced Auger Emission from Solid Targets," Scanning Electron Microscopy: Vol. 1986 : No. 2 , Article 3. Available at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/electron/vol1986/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western Dairy Center at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scanning Electron Microscopy by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY /1986/11 (Pages 351-368) 0586-5581/86$1.00+0S SEM Inc., AMF O'Hare (Chicago), IL 60666-0507 USA ION-INDUCED AUGER EMISSION FROM SOLID TARGETS Josette MISCHLERand Nicole BENAZETH Laboratoire de Physique des Solides, Associe au C.N.R.S. Universite Paul Sabatier et Institut National des Sciences Appliquees 118, Route de Narbonne - 31062 TOULOUSECedex (France) (Received for publication February 28, 1986: revised paper received July 16, 1986) Abstract Introduction We present a review of the Auger emission Impact of heavy ions on surfaces gives rise induced from light elements (Mg, Al, Si) bombarded to a variety of collision events leading to ejec­ by ions of intermediate energy (1 keV - 200 keV). tion of secondary or reflected ions, sputtered The different physical phenomena at the origin of atoms, electrons and photons.
    [Show full text]
  • UNESCO – Kalinga Prize Winner – 1971 Pierre Victor Auger a Life in the Service of Science
    Glossary on Kalinga Prize Laureates UNESCO – Kalinga Prize Winner – 1971 Pierre Victor Auger A Life in the Service of Science French Physicist, Discoverer of the Atomic Auger Electronic Effect. [Born : Paris 14th May, 1899 Died : Paris 25th December 1993] Professor Auger’s outstanding professional career covered Physics, Nuclear Power & Space Research, Organization and Administration of Research, Diplomatic Services & Pedagogics but also extended in to Modern Biology, Humanistic Sciences, Poetry & Arts. He was awarded with the most Prestigious Gaede – Langmuir Award “For establishing the Fundamental Principle of Auger Spectroscopy which has led to the most widely used surface analysis technique of importance to all aspects of Vacuum Science & Technology”. Energy with the Earth Atmosphere can be considered like discoverer of gigantic particle rains generated by the interaction of cosmic rays of Extreme Discharge ...Pierre Auger 1 Glossary on Kalinga Prize Laureates Pierre Victor Auger Pierre Victor Auger (May 14, 1899 – December 25, 1993) was a French Physicist, born in Paris. He worked in the fields of atomic physics, nuclear physics and cosmic ray physics. The Auger process where Auger electrons are emitted from atoms was named after him, despite the fact that Lise Meitner discovered the process a few years before in 1923. In his work with cosmic rays, he found that the cosmic radiation events were coincident in time meaning that they were associated with a single event, an air shower. He estimated that the energy of the incoming particle that creates large air showers must be at least 1015eV (electron-volts) = 106 particles of 108eV (critical energy in air) and a factor of ten for energy loss from traversing the atmosphere (Auger et al., 1939).
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Relaxation Processes in Atoms, Molecules and Clusters
    TOPICAL REVIEW Collective relaxation processes in atoms, molecules and clusters Pˇremysl Kolorenˇc1z, Vitali Averbukh2, Raimund Feifel3 and John Eland3;4 1Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Institute of Theoretical Physics, V Holeˇsoviˇck´ach 2, 18000 Prague, Czech Republic 2Department of Physics, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, SW7 2AZ London, UK 3Department of Physics, University of Gothenburg, Origov¨agen6, SE-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden 4Department of Chemistry, Physical & Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QZ, UK Abstract. Electron correlation is an essential driver of a variety of relaxation processes in excited atomic and molecular systems. These are phenomena which often lead to autoionization typically involving two-electron transitions, such as the well-known Auger effect. However, electron correlation can give rise also to higher- order processes characterized by multi-electron transitions. Basic examples include simultaneous two-electron emission upon recombination of an inner-shell vacancy (double Auger decay) or collective decay of two holes with emission of a single electron. First reports of this class of processes date back to the 1960's, but their investigation intensified only recently with the advent of free-electron lasers. High fluxes of high-energy photons induce multiple excitation or ionization of a system on the femtosecond timescale and under such conditions the importance of multi- electron processes increases significantly. We present an overview of experimental and theoretical works on selected multi-electron relaxation phenomena in systems of different complexity, going from double Auger decay in atoms and small molecules to collective interatomic autoionization processes in nanoscale samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurements of the Maximum Depth of Air Shower Profiles at LHC Energies with the High-Elevation Auger Telescopes
    Measurements of the maximum depth of air shower profiles at LHC energies with the High-Elevation Auger Telescopes Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften an der Fakultät für Physik des Karlsruher Instituts für Technologie (KIT) genehmigte Dissertation von Dipl.-Phys. Alaa Metwaly Kuotb Awad aus El Fayoum/Egypt Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 21.12.2018 Referent: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Johannes Blümer Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Ralph Engel Betreuer: Dr. Ralf Ulrich ii Abstract More than 100 years after their discovery, the nature of cosmic rays is still a mystery in many aspects. The subject of this thesis is to measure the mass composition of the cosmic rays at an energy range from 1015.8eV to 1017eV. This relies on the Cherenkov light emitted in the forward direction of the shower, directly pointing towards the telescopes. A new technique was proposed for the reconstruction named Profile Constrained Geometry Fit (PCGF). The benefit of this special technique is a high accuracy geometry reconstruction, which is pos- sible using only the telescope signals. A full PCGF dataset is produced for the Cherenkov dominated showers observed by the High Elevation Auger Telescopes (HEAT). The mass composition is deduced from the distribution of the maximum depth of those showers, Xmax. The first two moments of the distribution, hXmaxi, and s(Xmax), are compared to their counterparts of proton and iron simulations. The performance of the reconstruction and the analysis is studied using a complete time-dependent Monte Carlo simulation. It is a novel technique that is used for the first time in Pierre Auger, and by which the mass composition is measured in the energy region where there are signatures of cosmic ray transition from galactic to an extragalactic origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Monolayer Semiconductor Auger Detector Abstract Introduction
    Monolayer Semiconductor Auger Detector Authors: Colin M. Chow1, Hongyi Yu2,3, John R. Schaibley1,4, Pasqual Rivera1, Joseph Finney1, Jiaqiang Yan5, David G. Mandrus5,6, Takashi Taniguchi7, Kenji Watanabe7, Wang Yao3, David H. Cobden1*, Xiaodong Xu1,8* 1Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA. 2Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Quantum Metrology and Sensing & School of Physics and Astronomy, Sun Yat-Sen University (Zhuhai Campus), Zhuhai 519082, China. 3Department of Physics and Centre of Theoretical and Computational Physics, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. 4Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA. 5Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA. 6Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA. 7National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0044, Japan. 8Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA *email: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Auger recombination in semiconductors is a many-body phenomenon in which recombination of electrons and holes is accompanied by excitation of other charge carriers. Being nonradiative, it is detrimental to light emission. The excess energy of the excited carriers is normally rapidly converted to heat, making Auger processes difficult to probe directly. Here, we employ a technique in which the Auger-excited carriers are detected by their ability to tunnel out of the semiconductor through a thin barrier, generating a current. We employ vertical van der Waals (vdW) heterostructures with monolayer WSe2 as the semiconductor and the wide band gap hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) as the tunnel barrier to preferentially transmit high-energy Auger-excited carriers to a graphite electrode.
    [Show full text]
  • Real-Time Entanglement of Auger and XPS Electrons: a Preliminary Investigation
    LUND UNIVERSITY THESIS SUBMITTED FOR DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF SCIENCE PROJECT DURATION: 15 HP Real-time Entanglement of Auger and XPS Electrons: a preliminary investigation Supervisor: Claudio VERDOZZI Author: Co-Supervisors: Philip JOHANSSON Mathieu GISSELBRECHT Emil VINAS˜ BOSTROM¨ DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS DIVISION OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS Abstract In this work, we employ a semi-classical approach to light matter interaction to describe and char- acterize spin configurations resulting from quantum correlations between electrons created by a photoemission event and by the following Auger decay. The system studied consists of three atomic levels and two continua. Initially, an external classical light field, in the form of a narrow Gaussian packet, perturbs the system, and transfers the density of charge, corresponding to one electron (the photoelectron), from the core level to the continuum. The Auger decay then occurs, whereby an electron from either of the valence levels decay to the core while, at the same time, another electron (the Auger electron) is emitted to the continuum. The description of the system is performed in the time domain, by time-evolving the many-particle wave function. Tracking the density of charge in the atomic levels and the continuum levels allows for a description of the dynamics of photoe- mission and Auger decay. Calculating the concurrence, as measure of entanglement, between the photoelectron and the Auger electron, gives insight about the correlation between their spins. We consider two scenarios; altering the relative strengths of the matrix elements responsible for anti-parallel and parallel spin configuration while keeping the interaction between the photoelectron and the Auger electron fixed, and secondly varying the interaction while keeping all the matrix elements fixed.
    [Show full text]